
With photos of Sandy Hook Elementary School victims in the background, Senate Judiciary Committee member, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. speaks on on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2013. during the committee’s hearing on the Assault Weapons Ban of 2013. Credit: AP
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) made her case in favor of gun control during a packed hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday. The hearing was called to debate Feinstein’s proposed a ban on so-called “assault weapons.”
“Let me now describe the key features of our new legislation, the ‘Assault Weapons Ban of 2013,’” Feinstein said Wednesday. “The bill bans the sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing of 157 specifically named semi-automatic assault weapons.”
She continued: “It also bans any other assault weapon, which is defined as a semi-automatic weapon that can accept a detachable magazine and has one military characteristic, such as a pistol grip, barrel shroud, or folding stock…These features were developed for military weapons to make them more effective and efficient at killing people in close-combat situations.”
Feinstein, with photos of Sandy Hook victims behind her, argued that the U.S. has “witnessed an increased number of these mass killings” and called semi-automatic “assault weapons” the one “common thread running through these mass shootings.” She says the gun ban is needed in order to prevent future tragedies.
“Sadly, [Newtown] is not an anomaly,” Feinstein said. “We have witnessed an increased number of these mass killings. The one common thread running through these mass shootings — from Aurora, Colorado, to Tucson, Arizona, to Blacksburg, Virginia — is that the gunman used a military-style semi-automatic assault weapon or a large capacity magazine to inflict unspeakable terror.”
But do the facts support Feinstein’s argument?
Let’s start with the claim that mass killings are on the rise in the United States. According to the Associated Press, those who study mass shootings say they are not becoming more common.
“There is no pattern, there is no increase,” says criminologist James Allen Fox of Boston’s Northeastern University, who has been studying the subject since the 1980s, spurred by a rash of mass shootings in post offices.
Grant Duwe, a criminologist with the Minnesota Department of Corrections who has written a history of mass murders in America, said that while mass shootings rose between the 1960s and the 1990s, they actually dropped in the 2000s. And mass killings actually reached their peak in 1929, according to his data. He estimates that there were 32 in the 1980s, 42 in the 1990s and 26 in the first decade of the century.
Chances of being killed in a mass shooting, he says, are probably no greater than being struck by lightning.
“Without minimizing the pain and suffering of the hundreds…who have been victimized in senseless attacks, the facts say clearly that [there] has been no increase in mass killings,” Fox wrote. When clusters of incidents occur close together, he added, that likely reflects a mixture of copycatting and coincidence.
Many anti-gun advocates have noted that six of the 12 deadliest shootings in U.S. history have occurred since 2007, with the Newtown massacre ranking second on that list. However, mass killings, in fact, peaked in 1929.
Feinstein also argued that banning so-called “assault weapons” would help decrease mass shootings.
A study by the University of Pennsylvania concluded that the old assault weapons ban was undermined because it is difficult to define what an “assault weapon” actually is and there were already so many in circulation. The study also concluded that the law appeared to have little effect on gun violence overall, most likely because rifles are used in a small percentage of gun crimes.
Consider this, hands and feet, knifes, shotguns, and handguns all killed more people than rifles in 2010. According to FBI data, 358 people were killed by rifles that year, half that of people who were killed by “hands and feet.”
Finally, Feinstein argued that semi-automatic “assault weapons” were the “common thread” in mass shootings. While Newtown shooter Adam Lanza reportedly used a semi-automatic rifle during his rampage, Aurora shooter James Holmes’ AR-15 reportedly jammed. Holmes also had two Glock pistols and a shotgun, according to reports.
Tucson shooter Jared Loughner reportedly used a Glock 19 pistol with an extended 30-round magazine. All magazines with more than 10 rounds would be banned under Feinstein’s bill.
These are just a few examples, however, to insist that only so-called “assault weapons” are used in mass shootings would not be accurate.
In a previous Blaze report, Jordan Hunter, director of marketing for Daniel Defense, said a semi-automatic rifle is not the weapon most commonly used in mass shootings.
“We tracked 62 mass shootings wherein 5 or more people were either shot or killed from the early 1980’s to now; 41 times pistols were used, 12 times shotguns or some type of hunting-style rifle was used, and 9 times semi-automatic rifles were used (14 percent),” Hunter told TheBlaze.
Overall, Feinstein’s claims — the basis of her gun ban — don’t appear to hold up under scrutiny.
However, it may be important to note that Sen. Feinstein’s bill refers to certain types of handguns and shotguns as “assault weapons.”
Take a look at the full list of weapons that would be banned under the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2013.”
Rifles: All AK types, including the following: AK, AK47, AK47S, AK–74, AKM, AKS, ARM, MAK90, MISR, NHM90, NHM91, Rock River Arms LAR–47, SA85, SA93, Vector Arms AK–47, VEPR, WASR–10, and WUM, IZHMASH Saiga AK, MAADI AK47 and ARM, Norinco 56S, 56S2, 84S, and 86S, Poly Technologies AK47 and AKS; All AR types, including the following: AR–10, AR–15, Armalite M15 22LR Carbine, Armalite M15–T, Barrett REC7, Beretta AR–70, Bushmaster ACR, Bushmaster Carbon 15, Bushmaster MOE series, Bushmaster XM15, Colt Match Target Rifles, DoubleStar AR rifles, DPMS Tactical Rifles, Heckler & Koch MR556, Olympic Arms, Remington R–15 rifles, Rock River Arms LAR–15, Sig Sauer SIG516 rifles, Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles, Stag Arms AR rifles, Sturm, Ruger & Co. SR556 rifles; Barrett M107A1; Barrett M82A1; Beretta CX4 Storm; Calico Liberty Series; CETME Sporter; Daewoo K–1, K–2, Max 1, Max 2, AR 100, and AR 110C; Fabrique Nationale/FN Herstal FAL, LAR, 22 FNC, 308 Match, L1A1 Sporter, PS90, SCAR, and FS2000; Feather Industries AT–9; Galil Model AR and Model ARM; Hi-Point Carbine; HK–91, HK–93, HK–94, HK–PSG–1 and HK USC; Kel-Tec Sub–2000, SU–16, and RFB; SIG AMT, SIG PE–57, Sig Sauer SG 550, and Sig Sauer SG 551; Springfield Armory SAR–48; Steyr AUG; Sturm, Ruger Mini-14 Tactical Rife M–14/20CF; All Thompson rifles, including the following: Thompson M1SB, Thompson T1100D, Thompson T150D, Thompson T1B, Thompson T1B100D, Thompson T1B50D, Thompson T1BSB, Thompson T1–C, Thompson T1D, Thompson T1SB, Thompson T5, Thompson T5100D, Thompson TM1, Thompson TM1C; UMAREX UZI Rifle; UZI Mini Carbine, UZI Model A Carbine, and UZI Model B Carbine; Valmet M62S, M71S, and M78; Vector Arms UZI Type; Weaver Arms Nighthawk; Wilkinson Arms Linda Carbine.
Pistols: All AK–47 types, including the following: Centurion 39 AK pistol, Draco AK–47 pistol, HCR AK–47 pistol, IO Inc. Hellpup AK–47 pistol, Krinkov pistol, Mini Draco AK–47 pistol, Yugo Krebs Krink pistol; All AR–15 types, including the following: American Spirit AR–15 pistol, Bushmaster Carbon 15 pistol, DoubleStar Corporation AR pistol, DPMS AR–15 pistol, Olympic Arms AR–15 pistol, Rock River Arms LAR 15 pistol; Calico Liberty pistols; DSA SA58 PKP FAL pistol; Encom MP–9 and MP–45; Heckler & Koch model SP-89 pistol; Intratec AB–10, TEC–22 Scorpion, TEC–9, and TEC–DC9; Kel-Tec PLR 16 pistol; The following MAC types: MAC–10, MAC–11; Masterpiece Arms MPA A930 Mini Pistol, MPA460 Pistol, MPA Tactical Pistol, and MPA Mini Tactical Pistol; Military Armament Corp. Ingram M–11, Velocity Arms VMAC; Sig Sauer P556 pistol; Sites Spectre; All Thompson types, including the following: Thompson TA510D, Thompson TA5; All UZI types, including: Micro-UZI.
Shotguns: Franchi LAW–12 and SPAS 12; All IZHMASH Saiga 12 types, including the following: IZHMASH Saiga 12, IZHMASH Saiga 12S, IZHMASH Saiga 12S EXP–01, IZHMASH Saiga 12K, IZHMASH Saiga 12K–030, IZHMASH Saiga 12K–040 Taktika; Streetsweeper; Striker 12.
Belt-fed semiautomatic firearms: All belt-fed semiautomatic firearms including TNW M2HB.
The Associated Press contributed to this report
























































































































Comments (320)
SpeakSoftlyAndCarry
Feb. 28, 2013 at 1:35amJason you’re nearly (unintentionally I’m sure) as misleading as Dianne Feinstein. There is a very distinct difference between the “mass shootings” of the prohibition era that were motivated by criminal gain, and a “rampage shooting” by some nut thinking it’s cool to shoot strangers. The first rampage shooting in the U.S. was in Camden, NJ in 1949. Rampage Shootings remained very rare in the U.S. until the 1980s which coincidentally (or not) is about the time violent shooting arcade video games, and violent Gangsta rap came of age in pop culture. Jason you’d have done your readers a service by pointing out that these rampage shootings didn’t begin until nearly 65 years after full-auto and semi-auto weapons were made available to the U.S. public. 100 years ago anyone could walk into a hardware store and buy either with no I.D., no background check, no age limit, and no restrictions of any kind. So history proves that ease of accessibility has NOTHING to do with the motivations of rampage killers! And you would have done well to point out that the deadliest mass murders in the U.S. with the most casualties were committed with fire and/or explosives, NOT firearms, proving that anyone who’s serious about mass killing doesn’t even need a gun. And that Dianne’s “Common Thread” statement is an exaggeration at best considering the broad assortment of handguns, rifles and shotguns that have been used in these shootings, and that the only real “common thread” ha
Report this comment
SpeakSoftlyAndCarry
Feb. 28, 2013 at 1:37am…has been Evilness!
Report this comment
fmw1960
Feb. 28, 2013 at 1:27amKEATONC333, I’m not sure exactly when “20 or so” years ago was, but in the past 25 years, the UK has had 4 mass killings. (see below) This is not their murder rate, just mass killings. Keep in mind that the UK has about 63 million subjects and we have about 320 million free people. That statistic is relevant to all worldwide crime stat comparisons made to the USA. Also relevant is that besides having vastly smaller populations, most other countries have more stringent gun laws or outright bans in effect and there are still plenty of mass murders and violent crimes to go around. Adjusting for population and difference in gun laws, this clearly shows that over regulating or banning guns from law abiding people does not stop or reduce mass killings or crime. But all you have to really do is look at New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington D.C. etc. to find that out. And yes KEATONC333, you should move to the UK or Australia if you don’t like the way we do things here. I will buy your plane ticket if you promise not to come back. Really, I will.
August 19 1987 Michael Robert Ryan. Killed 15, injured 16. Weapon used – Firearm
March 16 1988 Michael Stone Killed 3, injured 68 Weapon used – Firearm/explosive
March 13 1996 Thomas Watt Hamilton Killed 17, injured 13-15 Weapon used – Firearm
June 2 2010 Derrick Bird. Killed 12, injured 11. Weapon used – Firearm
Report this comment
Rightturn
Feb. 28, 2013 at 1:08am“One common thread”? “ONE”? There is at least TWO common threads……1. Firearms were used 2. The assailants were mentally unstable! How about dealing with the mental health factor???? Stooooopid politician……
Report this comment
aogiss
Feb. 28, 2013 at 12:47amI cannot believe there is even a debate over these weapons. Of course, look at who the majority voted in for a second term.
The degree to which a mass murder is successful is based upon three factors: venue, timing, and weapon.
As an example, any decent marksman with a Remington 700 (bolt action rifle for those not aware) and a $100 scope could easily take out 50 people in a pre-Super Bowl Walmart parking lot. Heck, a person could probably take out twice that with a katana in a single pass through the self checkout lines.
There are a bunch of ways to kill a bunch of people, but these “law makers” just happened to land on these weapons, which happen to be the best home defenders on the market? (Not to mention their utility in hunting, ranching, pest control, etc.)
Here is what we need to do. Give Senator F(rak)einstein any “non-assault weapon”, put a pretty mask on her and put her in a ring with a coked up Mike Tyson. Get some popcorn before ringing the bell.
Just remember, when you embrace the fact their true goal is disarmament, all of their superhuman logic dodging abilities make sense. They will not debate the facts logically, or at all. They will just keep beating the drum until they win. If they do not win this round, they will come back again.
Report this comment
mygunsweetness
Feb. 28, 2013 at 12:33amKeatonC333 Yea ,BUT their violent crime has doubled (England,Australia)and if you would look on the net they want their guns back,but their socialist govt.won’t have it because they like total control over their people.They are feed up with being at the mercy of a gang of home invaders with guns.You need to fact check.I remember during the riots in London I saw a news report of a criminal shooting at the police,so once again only the bad guys will have guns,like Chicago,New york city,Detroit and LA murder capitals of the US.They all have gun bans.Now if you will look where we have concealed or open carry laws crime just drops like a ton of bricks,funny how you on the left always miss that FBI FACT.Violent crime is down 40% sense 1992 another fact that comes from the FBI.We will not give up our guns.
Report this comment
thebronze
Feb. 28, 2013 at 12:14amI hope she chokes and dies…
Report this comment
thebronze
Feb. 28, 2013 at 12:13amIn other words, Feinswine is a lying sack of ****.
Report this comment
uptickusa
Feb. 28, 2013 at 12:12amWhat if a rapist broke into this liberals bedroom-will she defend herself with her geriatric bedpan-idiot
Report this comment
Wannabee
Feb. 28, 2013 at 12:08amFeinstein needs a reminder about who she works for on the subject of degrading the second amendment.
1. Not for herself
2. Not for Newtown CT
3. Not for Obama
4. Not for California
5. Not for her party
On this issue, she works for ALL the people of the USA and for upholding her oath of office to defend and support the constitution of the United States whether she a Humanist Secular Progressive that she is likes it or not.
There is virtually not one American that lacks sympathy for the innocent helpless children killed by a person out of his mind after killinh his own mother in her sleep.
This unfortunate Senator is a disgrace to focus on weakening a right of every American and ignoring the containment of persons like Adam Lanza so persons like him are prevented from doing harm to others with any kinds of destructive devices. He could have entered with sticks of dynamite or molotov cocktails and done perhaps greater killing He could have wrapped himself with explosives and shrapnel. Laws do not stop the criminally insane from doing harm only confining them will.
The mantage of the beautiful children behind her is more disgusting because she is using their images as a tear-jerker rather than for the only righteous use; praying for their souls to rest in peace
Report this comment
666Sucks
Feb. 28, 2013 at 12:06amWhen will everyone wake up! This is not about gun crimes, this is about the communist overthrow of America and they need to get rid of rifles because we the f’n people Dan fight back with rifles! Wecan’t fight back with is tools against rifles so hey don’t care about hand guns! Helllooooooooooo, Mc Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!
Report this comment
666Sucks
Feb. 28, 2013 at 1:34amBeen a long day… Correction, With pistols against rifles
Report this comment
AmericaMustBeFree
Feb. 27, 2013 at 11:59pmI don’t know about you all, but I am ready to take our country back and put these creeps in Washington out to pasture.. Diane Feinstein at the top of the list. Do not comply when they want you to register your guns.. registeration ends up in confiscation!
Report this comment
MrKnowItAll
Feb. 27, 2013 at 11:58pmShe Looks Just like a Female Pinocchio. She Lies Like a 1000 of them. I HATE People that you can look at and tell just by looking at them that they think they are better then all of us. TERM LIMITS, TERM LIMITS, TERM LIMITS!!!!!!!
Report this comment
Chancellor
Feb. 27, 2013 at 11:45pmWhat else is new? She’s a star member of the Compulsive Liar’s Cast of Clowns…….Damn we need a deck of cards like they had in Iraq!
Report this comment
SoCtNights
Feb. 27, 2013 at 11:23pmMurders in the UK and Aus are counted differently than here in the US. There is one piece of data that can’t be disputed. Home invasions and burglaries in the UK “when the inhabitants are home” are common place. Why? Could it be the criminals there know they have nothing to fear…not even the bobbies.
Report this comment
SoCtNights
Feb. 27, 2013 at 11:10pmIn 2007 CT suffered another tragedy…the home invasion of the Petit family and the subsequent rape and murder of the Mother and her two daughters. This crime was committed by career criminals. Yes, they were captured outside the residence and have been found guilty of murder and other crimes. Once America is disarmed, how many families will be destroyed because criminals will know they have been given a green light to do as they please. Any politician that votes for this bill to disarm law abiding citizens will have blood on their hands when the crime spree begins. Maybe when a career criminal invades their home it will be taken more seriously. As for FEINSTEIN: I’m sure she has an armed security patrol, lives in a gated community, may have armed guards patroling, a panic button to bring armed guards running, an alarm system paid for by us…I’m guessing she doesn’t feel the need to lock her doors. All that’s left is to pay off her contributors and handlers with votes before she retires to put her name on a book she didn’t write but will receive a large paycheck legally.
Report this comment
BadDog-NoBiscuit
Feb. 27, 2013 at 11:05pmI just posted a link to this article on Dianne Feinstein’s Facebook page – it will be interesting to see how long it stays there… 8)
Report this comment
Nationalistic
Feb. 27, 2013 at 11:04pmSo! You want to have a “hearing”? Well, hear this idea! Gun control belongs to the CRIMINAL! If you are caught with a firearm that has been defaced (no serial number), You SHALL be responsible for a $10,000 fine or 3 years in jail (no early release) for the first offence. $25,000 fine or 5 years in jail (no early release) for the second offence. $50,000 fine AND 10 years in jail (no early release) for third and subsequent offences. That should suffice any common-sense-oriented-citizens out there who actually take responsibility for their own actions. Have a nice day!
Report this comment
AmericaMustBeFree
Feb. 28, 2013 at 12:03amIsn’t it funny they will arm Syria with the very same weapons they want to take from American’s.. plus give them extra weapons of mass destuction!
Report this comment
gunslinger
Feb. 27, 2013 at 10:44pmLooking for some Diane Fienstien paper targets. Cant find any, perhaps I need to make some..is there a Kinkos open at 9pm?
Report this comment
Nabuquduriuzhur
Feb. 27, 2013 at 10:23pmI’ve lost two cousins in two states to felons who couldn’t legally have firearms. They get them over the border, or the steal them, or they make them.
In what way does Feinstein’s bill help anyone by disarming those who are not by their nature, criminals?
Indeed, her bill would make for more victims.
I rebuke her in Jesus’ Name for her dishonestly, duplicity, and her complete lack of compassion toward others.
Report this comment
Nabuquduriuzhur
Feb. 27, 2013 at 10:21pmEver notice that when “it’s for the children” is used as an excuse, it’s NEVER for the children?
Report this comment
chips1
Feb. 27, 2013 at 9:43pmI noticed scalpals wern’t on the chart. Millions are killed in the Doctors office.
Report this comment
CommonSense41
Feb. 27, 2013 at 9:37pmI tried to not say bad words about a woman but I cannot stand Dianne Feinstein and others politicians like her. What make me angry that she a Jew tried second time to impose on US citizen ban on so called assault weapons. I do not think that she did not know what happened with Jewish people in Nazi Germany. If they had what citizen of Switzerland had it could be less Jewish people killed. It is beyond comprehension what she is doing . I am a Jew from former USSR and I despise Dianne Feinstein.
Report this comment
CaliMom
Feb. 27, 2013 at 9:27pmDianne Feinstein and other people pushing for guns to be off the streets I say…
Start first by going to all the gangs, rapist, thieves, thugs, killers and if I missed any I apologize.
When you go don’t forget take your clip board with all your rules, regulations, fees and laws and you ask for their guns that are not on the “approved list”
Do not forget to get their names also and come back and tell us all how that went:)
Report this comment
Ter_solo
Feb. 27, 2013 at 9:19pmCan you imagine living in Arizona and having 500 Illegals dumped on the street and NOT having and Ar15 with a 30 round clip?
Report this comment
vanman4446
Feb. 27, 2013 at 8:51pmDoesn’t this stupid jew remember what happened during world war II to the jews. The first thing hitler did was to take away the guns. But I’ll bet she gets to keep her gun.
Report this comment