‘You Will Regret…’:The Full ‘Threat’ Email a Top White House Official Sent Bob Woodward

Getty Images
Veteran Washington journalist Bob Woodward rocked the political and media world Wednesday after he claimed that a senior White House official threatened him over his reporting that President Barack Obama was actually behind the imminent forced federal budget cuts known as sequestration.
Woodward told Politico the exchange occurred in an email after the aide, later reported to be economic adviser Gene Sperling, “yelled at [him] for a half-hour.” The line in question: “You’re focusing on a few specific trees that give a very wrong impression of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here. … I think you will regret staking out that claim.”
Woodward “repeated the last sentence, making clear he saw it as a veiled threat. “ ‘You’ll regret.’ Come on,” he said. “I think if Obama himself saw the way they’re dealing with some of this, he would say, ‘Whoa, we don’t tell any reporter ‘you’re going to regret challenging us.’”
Politico published the email exchange between Sperling and Woodward in full Thursday morning:
From Gene Sperling to Bob Woodward on Feb. 22, 2013
Bob:
I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today. My bad. I do understand your problems with a couple of our statements in the fall — but feel on the other hand that you focus on a few specific trees that gives a very wrong perception of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here.
But I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post. I know you may not believe this, but as a friend, I think you will regret staking out that claim. The idea that the sequester was to force both sides to go back to try at a big or grand barain with a mix of entitlements and revenues (even if there were serious disagreements on composition) was part of the DNA of the thing from the start. It was an accepted part of the understanding — from the start. Really. It was assumed by the Rs on the Supercommittee that came right after: it was assumed in the November-December 2012 negotiations. There may have been big disagreements over rates and ratios — but that it was supposed to be replaced by entitlements and revenues of some form is not controversial. (Indeed, the discretionary savings amount from the Boehner-Obama negotiations were locked in in BCA: the sequester was just designed to force all back to table on entitlements and revenues.)
I agree there are more than one side to our first disagreement, but again think this latter issue is diffferent. Not out to argue and argue on this latter point. Just my sincere advice. Your call obviously.
My apologies again for raising my voice on the call with you. Feel bad about that and truly apologize.
Gene
Read Woodward’s response to Sperling here.
The White House has denied threatening Woodward, telling Politico, “Of course no threat was intended. As Mr. Woodward noted, the email from the aide was sent to apologize for voices being raised in their previous conversation. The note suggested that Mr. Woodward would regret the observation.”
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.















































































































Comments (173)
Attila
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:35amGene Sperling is but a Cockaroach in the white house bundle of miscreants and lunatics.
Get some bug spray ???
Report this comment
83plus
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:41amI can just imagine the firestorm the MSM would make if someone said that to a known liberal in the news media world.
But here, don’t expect much of anything from the MSM, those ‘journalists’ don’t care.
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:08am@83, Woodward IS a liberal. He’s just not liberal enough. The question is: Can you imagine the firestorm if a Republican Administration had made such a threat?
Report this comment
JacquesChirac
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:19amYawn…
So what?
Woodward is obviously an angry old racist white male who – as Cavallo notes above – is not liberal enough.
Attacks on character will be next, followed by some obscure fact that notes that Woodward is battling Alzheimer’s.
Nothing to see here, folks – just business as usual.
Do you REALLY thing the LSM is stupid enough to prolong this?? Not a chance…unless it has a death wish.
Rahm Emanuel…gone, but not forgotten…
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:44amSperling’s email is very awkwardly worded and clearly it’s contrived. He seems to be trying to do some damage control for the bad meeting he had with Woodward. But Sperling couldn’t help throwing in the veiled threat anyway.
Woodward has some friends in the media (while others in the media are openly and gleefully supplicating themselves to Obama) so if the white house shuts him out or escalates the retaliatory actions against him…Obama may find a few media minions not so cooperative..and perhaps even willing to get into some investigations on his administration. The worm may have indeed turned.
But Obama seems to be made of teflon, nothing so far has been able to stick to him..primarily because the media won’t do it’s job. He’s got a cocoon of protectors around him that are obsessive about controlling the message but a good journalist that’s cheesed off about how Woodward is being treated could tear open that cocoon. All it takes is one.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:53amGene Sperling yet one more culture changing, tradition destroying, I want to rule your life, Jewish progressive. No surprise he’s also an economic adviser. How many examples does one require in order to see the light?
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 12:05pmGet the ovens ready JERK…don’t forget to spit polish your jackboots…or your white-laced doc martens.
Report this comment
83plus
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 12:12pm@Cavallo Oh for sure, especially if the official were a tea party member former or currently active.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 12:20pmAvengerK, just another piece of the truth that you fear so much. Shine light on the truth. Come out of the shadows. You can not make informed decisions if you are not informed.
Report this comment
rosegrower
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 12:30pm@83Plus
Woodward is the person who, with Bernstein, was credited with bringing down the “evil conservative” president, Richard Nixon. Now, the people he has championed all of his adult life have turned on him for telling the truth. Sounds a lot like the Soviet Union’s way of dealing with recalcitrant journalists who failed to toe the party line.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 12:44pmRosegrower, you’re catching on. That is exactly where they are taking us.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zionism_versus_Bolshevism
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 1:17pmJihad Jerk, the problem is, the 5% of what you are spot on about is over shadowed by the 95% nazi you maintain, barely. You would still have issues if it was a female, latino, or kracker with blonder **** and bluer eyes than you. If it was a muslim you would be quiet. Oh, lalalalalalalalanazi.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 1:22pmFubared, do you ever make any sense?
Report this comment
cbrown
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 1:28pmWoodward has fallen far from his days of glory. Now he has to manufacture controversy in order to seem to be still credible.
Report this comment
SREGN
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 1:49pmJust get into the cattle car, Bob. we’ve really appreciated all your past support but it’s time to move on. So climb into the cattle car, and when you get to the camp remember: Arbeit Macht Frei.
Report this comment
goldmind
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 1:53pmI can almost see the crest of the Obama Tsunami, just over the horizon. A little voice, keeps nagging my brain and telling me more than just a progressive agenda is responsible for the quake that gave rise to Obama’s Tsunami. A collective effort, from all political factions and media institutions, are becoming more clarified. The few of US, to be trusted seem to be dwindling in numbers. Lots of talk, and so little action. The high ground, has been leveled. There is no coordination, no million men and women marches on the enemy. Everyone appears to be cowered, by the Nation’s imminent destruction. The gates have been breached, and we treat it like a fireside chat. I can do nothing to quell the fear in the hearts of my children. We are ALL alone. Divided, by an unknown political parasite. If true, the Obama Tsunami, is certainly a just dessert. Too bad, it has come to this. We The People, duped and doped down by political clowns and scam lords. Goodbye America. Maybe, it was all just a bad dream.
Report this comment
Polwatcher
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 2:06pmThreatening people is what Democrat aides do for a living. That is how they keep everyone in line. It is done all the time. “You will live to regret it.” is only a slap on the cheek. How about “I’ll track you down and get you”. People in Chicago often turn up dead after being threatened by Dems. Where was Obama from? Woodward is scared they will hurt his reputation.
Report this comment
USNVET66-70
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 2:11pmTypical CHICAGO.
Report this comment
NevadaGypsyMom
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 2:46pmAfraid we will have to wait for 20 January 2015 and then have the whole White House
fumigated like we did after the Clintons were finally gone, with the silver.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 3:04pmSregn, “Arbetn shall set`du bkhinem”
Report this comment
cbrown
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 3:11pm@NevadaGypsyMom
Yes, the Clintons will again move in on 20th Jan 2017.
Report this comment
SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 3:40pmMaybe, just maybe, the threat was made over the phone and the email followed up to show how “benign” the threat was.
Nothing like a good electronic trail to cover your intimidation tactics.
Report this comment
YOURSENSEI
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 3:53pmThis is what you must know:
That’s it? Seriously? Wow, you conservatives gotta butch up. How do you expect to win a civil war if you cry and snivel about such patty cake things? Geez, Louise, looks like somebody gave the sleeping giant a gonadectomy.
Molon labe? More like moaning baby.
It is so.
Report this comment
Quester55
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 9:09pmNo news here, This is simple, ” S.O.P. “, for Obama’s Press Control Goon Squad.. Nothing is too low for these Goons, not even their version of, A.D & D!
Report this comment
zapparules
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 10:47amWhy Woodward? Do you need a little publicity to sell your book?
You should be embarrassed to have even insinuated that what Sperling wrote was some sort of threat. (I know. You never actually called it a threat. But you also said nothing to dispel the frenzy you were helping to create around what was written.
And OF COURSE the conservative mouthpieces will run with anything like this that might make the Obama administration look bad.
Report this comment
DoctorRon
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:34amI hope Woodward does not get “Fostered.”
Report this comment
Tom K
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:27am@ DOCTORRON : Or Breitbarted (Sp.) There would be hell to pay.
Report this comment
MAX0O1
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 1:00pmOH BOY that statement rings a bell!
Report this comment
toto
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 1:50pmYup, Sudden heart attack, one car or even multi car fatal accident, suicide, drug induced mental incapacity, other freak accident…… Watch your back, and all your other sides, Woodward and that of every member of your family (think Brit Hume’s son), these people consider themselves above the law, decency, honor, and integrity at all times.
Report this comment
DIR
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:03pmOr dieing from a self induced overdose of stool softener; or from trying to commit suicide by attempting to flushing one’s self down a toilet, regularly used by Hillary (in that case the tell tell sign of murder would be the a greasy skid mark to the forehead).
Report this comment
P4cooler
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:32amThe Whites House is occupied by thugs. Our country has been DEAD IN THE WATER for over 4 years. Why is the media still living inside Obama’s underwear? I have a message for our Fraud President. Get the hell out of our White House you punk. Better yet…. get the hell out of our country. We don’t need you to inflict pain on the American people any more! You have impeded all growth and killed our chances at prosperity. We Americans do not want to live in the Obama stone age. You have showed us the depths that you hate America. Get the hell out of America you punk!!!
Report this comment
Johngun
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:54amGreat comment! You nail it perfectly!
Report this comment
atechgeek
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:56am“Why is the media still living inside Obama’s underwear? ”
Because he will have them killed if they betray him. Clinton had a bunch of people killed. Do you not think Obama would drop a Nuke on NY if the NY Times published bad thoughts about him ?
We are headed for very dark days unless we can get honorable people to lead this country.
Report this comment
bitterclinger
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:03amI believe George Soros is responsible for MSM paychecks these days, actually, since 1992 or so. George is calling the tune for the country and our greedy traitorous “countrymen” in positions of power are more than happy to dance. George has mentioned that he’s managing the decline of the U.S. dollar. There isn’t much you can’t do when you’re a billionaire and minion of the Underworld.
Report this comment
RNM
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:23amNot an Obama fan, but this comment is ridiculous.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:54amP4COOLER…I’ll say it because others here are afraid to say it. But I really don’t give a tinker’s cuss about what a liberal troll thinks of me. You see liberals rely on conservatives being just that..”conservative” and I don’t give them what they want.
Becasue the media is dominated by blind, stupid liberals manufactured by the liberal colleges and were taught by aging-hippie, marxist professors. Obama is the epitome of liberal pet causes. His color is the kicker..that’s why Hillary got the shaft in 2008. Obama is a liberal wet-dream of protected class fantasies and Alinsky tactics. He’s openly socialist, he’s black, he plays dirty against the republicans and any dissenting liberals (this is important as control of everyone is vital to statist aspirations) and he doesn’t care about governance, he only cares about creating a democrat political monopoly powered by rules, regulations and laws geared to further liberal causes.
Report this comment
DZ-015
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:29amI visited the Texas State Museum in Austin shortly after it opened. It was interesting to see the inscription at the entrance to the effect of “It isn’t bragging if it’s true.” The same might be said of the statement to Carl Woodward that he would regret staking out his claim. It isn’t a threat if it’s true?
Report this comment
Exidor
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:28amThat’s the Chicago way.
And 99% of the sheeple don’t see it.
Report this comment
rzraick
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 4:54pm100% of the sheeple don’t see it, because once they see it, they are no longer sheeple.
Report this comment
Budrow
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:25amLet’s not get too crazy here. I don’t see those comments as a threat at all. I think someone is trying to make it seem that way but it doesn’t read-to-me like it was intended to be threatening.
Report this comment
UNALIEN
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:34amIn politics that is a threat,, Lanny Davis has just admitted that the WH also threatened him and it was even more serious..
Report this comment
Lloyd Drako
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:37amNo, it’s obvious it was meant to be apologetic. If you live in Washington, you don’t want to get on the wrong side of Bob Woodward!
Report this comment
UNALIEN
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:50amLLOYD DRAKO
it was a followup to a conversation, it was a threat and intimidation..
If a republican WH official had done this to member of the media, you would be calling it a threat… YOU KNOW IT
Report this comment
Lloyd Drako
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:02amUnAlien: You are delusional. Woodward himself doesn’t seem to regard it as a threat, does he? He knows how the game is played. His punishment will likely consist of encountering a few more closed doors when he goes to do his next tell-all book. Unless there’s some sex stuff he’d rather keep quiet, which I doubt. Far from the Gulag or a sidwalk hit.
Report this comment
nonofmybiznez
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:05amIf Bob Woodward thought it was a threat, it was a threat. I’m sure he would recognize it if he heard it because we have all heard Obama bully reporters in the past and it went over your heads. You did not recognize it, but the reporters he bullied did. Why do you think they all bow to him? They all know that if they ruffle his feathers, they will be rewarded by being kicked off the plane or out of the press room. Wake up people, Obama is a bully
Report this comment
Gonzo
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:22amYou’re going to regret that statement Budrow. Like it?
Report this comment
RNM
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:22amImplying a threat was made is good for dramatic effect I guess… typical Beck style.
Report this comment
cbrown
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 5:04pm@Gonzo
Are you threatening us by using the word “regret” :).
Report this comment
linb
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:13pmYou are in fantasy land if you don’t think the threat is true! We’re not dealing with normal politicians here – we’re dealing with a new breed that think rules are for everyone except them – and they’re getting away with it because nobody in the government right now has the b***s yet to stand up and do something. I can’t help wondering what the heck we need the FBI for anymore – wasn’t this supposed to be their job? Vetting the prez and politicians? I guess they have them busy with taking innocent citizen’s guns away.
Report this comment
zombiestopper
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:25amPraise Bob Woodward for speaking the truth…….. I hope he does not pay dearly for it
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:25amHe has blasphemed against the Messiah. The One’s acolytes, servants, and sycophants at ABC, CBS, NBC, and the Times will come for Woodward. He has offended powers he cannot possibly comprehend. Welcome to Oceania, Mr Woodward. Big Brother is watching.
Report this comment
WillG
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:06amThis is merely the beginning. The threats are being spread around and soon they will act out make good on them.
Report this comment
OVMAMA
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:24amDang, I had my money on the treat coming from Valerie Jarrett…. who the heck is Gene Sperling? Gosh, dang, darn, dang… I gotta do more home work now!
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:31amOVA: They all share the same ” ethics” and culture…
Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:24am“…saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post.”
If this is an accurate reproduction of the e-mail it shows how little respect “Gene” has for the office of POTUS. It should always be in “caps” regardless of who the POTUS is. Especially the P and the US.
Report this comment
SquidVetOhio
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:55amI see what you did there. lol
Report this comment
S-O-B-E-R
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:24amHis argument is “it was assumed.” You know what they say about assumptions, right, Mr. Sperling? (The same guy who threatened Lanny Davis’ editor, too, I believe). And then the WH’s “explanation” is a lie, of course. They said it was an apology for voices (plural) being raised. It was not. There was an apology for this guy’s voice being raised only.
Report this comment
nonofmybiznez
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:11amGood point. You really have to disect this administration because they will take twist words. They do it all the time. They are lawyers after all is said and done. They will distort the meaning of sex (Clinton). Lawyers do it all the time.
Report this comment
nonofmybiznez
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:15amYou’re not a lawyer are you? LOL
Report this comment
S-O-B-E-R
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 1:05pm:) – No, but have learned to, like you say, dissect everything coming out of this administration. By the way, I do know some lawyers with great integrity and sense of service.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:24amProbably a good thing Woodward released that email…might give him some protection from the Obama Chicago radicals ! Emphasis on “might. ” ( get ready for another “scandal!” Remember what they did to Petraeus . We know how the Chicago crowd operates . oh , and what media event is Michelle staging today ?! Grooming her for Obama III ?! )
Report this comment
nonofmybiznez
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:16amThe only way to stop it is to expose it to the light.
Report this comment
Xanderson
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 1:53pmBarber2– you say things like Michelle and Obama lll and then my nightmares haunt me day AND night! Please say you were just joking :O
Report this comment
justangry
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:24amCareful Woodward, Obama’s drones aren’t going to be cut by sequestration.
Report this comment
AbrahamsSheepdog
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:03amBoys toys for a emperor and a must have. We all love RC stuff, well welcome to the future of ufos that watch. Solar power is a big key
Report this comment
nonofmybiznez
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:14amThat is exactly what they are hoping for. They cannot bully all of us…we will not sit down and shut up. This is American and you cannot treat her people this way.
Report this comment
Not_Fooled
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:23amSo this is what Obama meant when he said we were beginning a “new era of civility”.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:28amNOT: Yeah. Just like that ” transparency” business – while he hides his college records ! Lies !
Report this comment
S-O-B-E-R
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:52amBARBER2, Yeah. Did you hear him say just recently, “We log in all of the names of people who visit the WH”? He didn’t mention the building down the street where those visitors are not logged in. I would like to see some serious stakeout around that place by a true investigative journalist.
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:22amAnd so the threats, smears, slander, innuendo and character assassination accelerate yet again; now that Obama has nothing to lose, we will see more and more threats made, and in the course of time as his madness and narcissism continue to grow, the blatant murder of those he deems ‘enemies of the state’.
Bob Woodward had best watch his back before Obama orders him to be ‘disappeared’ for good.
Report this comment
Lloyd Drako
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:16am“Threats, smears, slander, innuendo and character assassination. ” Of course, Obama and his people have been subjected to none of those.
Don’t expect Woodward to disappear. If this escalates, expect him to get a gig on Fox.
Report this comment
UNALIEN
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:21amGene B. Sperling
Director of the National Economic Council and Assistant to the President for Economic Policy
Gene B. Sperling is Director of the National Economic Council and Assistant to the President for Economic Policy. Upon his appointment on January 7, 2011, Mr. Sperling became the first person to serve as NEC Director and principal economic policy advisor for two presidents: first under President Clinton from 1997 to 2001, and now under President Obama.
Mr. Sperling was also Senior Fellow for Economic Policy at the Center for American Progress, where he authored The Pro-Growth Progressive: An Economic Strategy for Shared Prosperity.
————————
So, Gene Sperling is a Centre for American Progress guy,,, SOROS
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:27amUN: The entire Obama Circus is also part of the Soros empire…funded and created by the Wizard himself.
Report this comment
OVMAMA
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:29am“Aaaah, hhhh I knew it!” Thanks, I did not have to grab the shovel and start digging down the rabbits hole with this one.
Report this comment
S-O-B-E-R
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:47amThanks UNALIEN. “An Economic Strategy for Shared Prosperity.” Wow.
Report this comment
Lloyd Drako
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:21amIt’s very clear from tone and context that Sperling means that Woodward’s reputation as a journalist will suffer. Of course, if Woodward dies from a slip and fall in his home when he is 99 years old, you all will say he was killed by Obama’s minions anyway.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:26amLLOYD: No we won’t. You lie . Typical of an Obama dude.
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:27amDon’t be so obtuse Lloyd,BHO has left a trail of dead bodies from his gay lovers in Chicago which paved the way for the POS fraud to become POTUS.
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:27amIf space aliens arrive and shower us with gold and riches tomorrow, you’ll just claim that Obama caused the prosperity.
See how easy it is to set up a straw man?
Report this comment
00100111
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:28amIf you’d stopped at the first sentence, you’d have more credibility. Seeing as you proceeded to derp around, you showed us all that you’re incapable of having an adult conversation. This is why we mock you, you have not earned being addressed as an adult.
Now, go put your shoes on, we’re taking you to day care.
Report this comment
13th Imam
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:34amIf he slip’s and falls and dies tomorrow, Lloyd will just say, Uh, Eh, What a strange coinkydink.
Report this comment
UNALIEN
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:41amaudio,, ex Clinton aid Lanny Davis was also threatened..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dR-uoBT4uJ8
The White House aide allegedly told Times editor John Solomon, “that if he continued to run my [Davis'] columns, he would lose, or his reporters would lose their White House credentials.”
Report this comment
Lloyd Drako
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:53amOuch! It seems I touched a nerve. Glad to have been of service.
Report this comment
dblaess
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 1:19pmI have read a number of your posts here. I am not sure if you get paid by the word or by the post, however, the bottom line is that your employeer (Obama) creates a problem, then says it was someone else. Then Obama campaigns against that problem with the intent to create a larger government / media loyal to him. Obama’s problem with Woodward is that Woodward has street cred to talk truth to power and in this case showed the Obama who voted for it before he voted against it(sequestration). This is not to be tolerated since others might now start to look at all the past problems that Obama created and said had to be fixed today because tommorrow will be too late.
Report this comment
JacquesChirac
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 2:51pmSorry. I’m not buying any of this. It wouldn’t surprise me at all to find out that Woodward and Sperling cooked this up to deflect our attention away from the fact that the emperor is now downplaying how long it will take for the world to fall apart as laid out in his speech last week.
Woodward is just the foil VJ and Axelrod needed. Credible with the “old crowd”, but absolutely harmless to the “young-uns”.
Who would you rather smear – Rachel Madcow or Bob Woodward??
Watch the right hand, folks. NEVER MIND WHAT I’M DOING WITH THE LEFT HAND!!!
And based on the fact that so many of us are commenting on it, I’d say the strategy worked pretty well, no??
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:18amTypical Obama tactic: the aide yelled at Woodward for half-hour ( no witnesses / no proof ) but then sends a long, involved email which contains a veiled threat but which is convoluted and open to various interpretations. The Chicago radicals are skilled at intimidation. We have been watching their Media Character Assassination Squad ever since Obama appeared on the political scene – that is part of their ” culture.” The Chicago radicals are a political combination of Bernie Madoff phony economic deals , the Race Card, and Al Capone Media enforcers. A very bad combination for America.
Report this comment
13th Imam
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:18amWoodward better not walk in A Breitbart’s footsteps. You expose the Obama murder machine at your peril.
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:18amChicago thug politics at work here and the passive aggressive attitude Gene takes with Bob is really grating. Come on Woodward do to Barry what you did to Nixon,I know you’re a lib but do something good for your country and remove a POS tyrant from power.
Report this comment
gyro
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:30amfun watching thee liberals get what they deserve some times
Report this comment
AUsername
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:16amif he is a killed we know why and by who.
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 1:19pmBut will you get off on charges due to drug induced temporary insanity? Go on Maury Povich and speak.
Report this comment
starman70
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:16amHEY, welcome to Chicago gangster politics Mr. Woodward. You now can see exactly how “HIS IMPERIAL MAJESTY” and his band of merry men operate. Next you will be geting a knock on the door from the IRS.
Your courage in exposing the pack of lies eminating from the “Regiem” about the sequester and its effects is extraordinary. You are doing the job that the American press should have been doing all along.
CONGRATULATIONS TO YOU FOR YOUR COURAGE!!!
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:23amIt will be from the IRS, DEA, and so many other agencies that this mans career is finished; no matter what Obama will never let this matter rest so long as one person remains in opposition to Obama.
Report this comment
Lloyd Drako
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:36amRidiculous. I’m tempted to ask, a la Hillary, “At this point, what does it matter whose idea the sequester was?” If it was a Republican idea, they proposed it because they thought that by 2013 Obama would no longer be president. If it was Obama’s idea, it was a desperate effort to avoid debt default with some measure, any measure, that the obstreperous House Republicans would agree to. Whether Woodward is right or wrong won’t even be a story any more in a few weeks. You will have moved on to something else, so enjoy this while you can.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:39amLLOYD: Say ” hi” to everyone at Obama Central !
Report this comment
UNALIEN
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:47amLLOYD DRAKO
because it isn’t about the Sequester. it is about the fact that the President is a crook and a liar
you drones continue to support a gang of criminals that are using you to extort wealth and power from everyone
Report this comment
Lloyd Drako
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 11:14amUnAlien: You’re right about one thing. It isn’t about the sequester. It’s about who to blame for the sequester, on the assumption that it will happen and that the consequences will be bad. In other words, politics, which, as a wise man once reminded us, “ain’t beanbag.”
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:14am“as a friend” was used by Chicago thugs for a long time before the ice pick or .22 behind the ear action ensued. Sure. Woodward needs to check his car often and travel in a group. Base, common, Chicago thugs running the show.
Report this comment
newsman76
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:13amDHS To Buy All Ammo: In The Market For 50 Billion .223 Shell Casings
http://govtslaves.info/dhs-to-buy-all-ammo-in-the-market-for-50-billion-223-shell-casings/
Report this comment
DougHuffman
Posted on February 28, 2013 at 10:13amThink – believe – feel – you will regret. We have the FedGov Federal Executive and the administration that we deserve. MOLON LABE Lord of Flies
Report this comment