Science

First Look at the Bottom of the Lake Under a Glacier in Antarctica

Earlier this year, NASA successfully bored a 2,600-foot hole through an Antarctic glacier’s ice in their quest to reach its sub-glacial lake — a feat that took three days in and of itself. Next, they sent a camera down and have recently released the first footage of what the lake below the glacier looks like.

NASA Team Releases First Video of Antarctica Sub glacial Lake

(Image: YouTube screenshot)

What you’re looking at, as NASA Jet Propulsion Lab researcher Alberto Behar explained in the video, is a very fine sediment that only comes with the movement of a glacier over rocks. Behar said when the camera went down, they were surprised because the lake was much shallower than they expected — 1.6 meters instead of 10 meters.

The device used to explore the hole and the opening into Lake Whillans below is unique in and of itself. Micro-Submersible Lake Exploration Device. NASA describes the device, developed by the U.S. team of the international Whillans Ice Stream Sub-glacial Access Research Drilling (WISSARD) project, as “instrument was a small robotic sub about the size and shape of a baseball bat.”

NASA Team Releases First Video of Antarctica Sub glacial Lake

Here you’re seeing the inside of the borehole. (Photo: NASA/JPL-Caltech)

“This is the first instrument ever to explore a sub-glacial lake outside of a borehole,” Behar said in a statement. “It’s able to take us places that are inaccessible by any other instruments in existence.”

Watch this video about the expedition – what it took get get there, to drill and to capture the footage:

From water samples collected by the team, they identified microbial life in the lake water. NASA stated that such a discovery could “important implications for the search for life elsewhere in the universe.”

Similar: 

(H/T: GeekOSystem)

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Comments (64)

  • RamonPreston
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 3:07pm

    Do you really think that NASA would have reported anything that goes against “standard science”? They show you these blurry pictures from Mars and want you to think they are they cutting edge of our technology.They could show you the pimple on a frog’s behind.

    Report this comment

    RamonPreston  
    • Tifn8r
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 4:53pm

      Uh uh Ramon,

      It’s a WART on the frog, on a bump, on a log, in the hole in the bottom of the sea.

      And a nerd running the expensive robot we paid for, filming it to try and prove his liberal education matters.

      Report this comment

      Tifn8r  
    • LetUsReason
      Posted on March 4, 2013 at 12:25pm

      I like how he says, “This is one of the most remote locations in Antarctica.” Hahaha. Of course, you can only reach this location after maneuvering through a series of backroads, way outside the city center and far from Antarctic suburbia.

      Report this comment

      LetUsReason  
  • Maximus_Delta
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 2:57pm

    well, that was 2:08 wasted of my life….

    Report this comment

    Maximus_Delta  
  • wilbstal
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 2:30pm

    Ohhh Look for Jimmy Hoffa and Obama, oh thats right Obama is still around

    Report this comment

    wilbstal  
  • AlaskaBob
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 1:02pm

    There have been recent notable successes in going through ice in Antarctica. The finest was retrieving a bottle of aged Scotch from the Shackleton camp site which had been buried in ice for a century and sampled to create a replica batch of the hard stuff. Now there is science and exploration coming together in perfect harmony.

    Report this comment

    AlaskaBob  
  • shorelineliz
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 1:00pm

    NASA: Wasting tax payer money one hole at a time.

    Report this comment

    shorelineliz  
  • lostinatl
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 10:40am

    How can we depend on them to know if there is any type of climate change when they think there is 10 meters of water at the bottom and there is only 1.7 meters. If you can’t tell what is at the bottom then you can not determine thickness. Which means you can not determine if we are gaining or losing ice. Global warming myths again.

    Report this comment

    lostinatl  
  • DZ-015
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 9:38am

    I wonder if the Russians are doing something similar at the much larger Lake Vostok on the other side of Antarctica. The ice is much thicker, but they supposedly drilled through it last year or so.

    Report this comment

    DZ-015  
  • mrja
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 9:26am

    Who cares about silt at the bottom of this lake, keep drilling and see if theres any oil

    Report this comment

    mrja  
  • KangarooJack
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 7:02am

    Bottle it-sell it-and pay for a trip to Mars!

    Report this comment

    KangarooJack  
  • woody4_rom828
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 5:10am

    Again, science particularly NASA seems consumed with trying to make the case for possibility of life elsewhere, and for what actual goal? To advance science and knowledge or to finally say ahah! see the scriptures were wrong? Just sayin..

    Report this comment

    woody4_rom828  
    • Eastinfection
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 5:58am

      This may be beyond the realm of my theological knowledge- so correct me if i’m wrong- but i don’t believe the scriptures specifically discount the possibility of Extra Terrestrial life.

      Report this comment

      Eastinfection  
    • J144
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 6:57am

      Its another straw-man by the anti-God folks. Find life on another planet and it somehow “proves” evolution can occur. Why is there a frozen lake under ice that takes 3 days to drill through? See Walt Brown’s on-line book at creationscience.com. It also explains why we should find traces of water on Mars. Both stem from what was reported in the Bible (which is why liberal scientists say “we don’t know” we some of us do know.)

      Report this comment

      J144  
    • HOOT_OWL
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 8:20am

      If we had the money ,I would say let them look.
      My belief in God is so strong , that I know the only thing they would find is more proof of his existence . Not the little green men kind . God didn’t stop the Tower of Babble because they were in doubt of his existence. God put a stop to it ,because they wanted to be ‘like God’ . Satan tried this too and it doesn’t end well for him either.

      BUT, since we are flat flipping broke ,if someone wants to search the heavens, let them do it on their own dime. Not ours.

      Report this comment

      HOOT_OWL  
    • Bullitt2008
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 8:26am

      The “lake” was only 1.6 instead of 10 meters as they expected. More evidence of global warming (it was global cooling in the early 70′s)! The inside scoop is that NASA is actually looking for organisms to develop something they are calling Soylent Green.

      Report this comment

      Bullitt2008  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 9:07am

      Ah, Cold Water

      Report this comment

      13th Imam  
    • WakeUp
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 10:08am

      True, but it is also true that the bible simply does not mention life or non existance of life elsewhere. But God haters spend all their time on wild goose chases because they mistakenly think that science and God are mutually exclusive. Actually, science has has been driven throughout the centuries by religious people, and as we learn more, science does more to “prove” God and has never found anything to disprove it.

      Atheists see science and God as opposing views. People that believe in God see science as a search for understanding of Gods methods.

      Report this comment

      WakeUp  
    • capitalismrocks
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 10:10am

      Why would the scriptures be wrong? God created the universe, are we to think that he made a vaste universe that is billions of light years wide and put only 1 planet within it with life? That God didn’t seed the entire universe with various planets with life, and that one day we would reach out and find our other brothers and connect with them? I mean really, to think so narrowly that Earth would be the one and only place God would place man is a very closed way of thought.

      Report this comment

      capitalismrocks  
    • Soulfire1975
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 12:18pm

      Wouldn’t make scriptor wrong, just proves even more about God creating the universe and he is everywhere.

      Report this comment

      Soulfire1975  
    • HOOT_OWL
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 12:31pm

      capitalismrocks
      Your idea of another planet with brothers and sisters ,doesn’t stand up to biblical teachings .
      Jesus had to die only once for the sins of the world. Now if your referring to heavenly bodies,
      angels and such .whole different story.

      Report this comment

      HOOT_OWL  
    • Witness1974
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 1:34pm

      HootOwl: I agree with all you said in this section. The space program, whatever it started out to be, is now a prove evolution project. I don’t appreciate the billions of dollars spent on it when our existing terrestrial infrastructure is crumbling under our feet. As far as God making the universe with other life forms. I seriously doubt it. God didn’t need to make anything, and He certainly was under no obligation to use space to suit our idea of how it should be used. Anyone who is looking to reach out and pet ET better hurry. We’ve got a little over a thousand years left before He creates a new heaven and a new earth. A thousand of those years He will be ruling here on earth and I doubt finding water on Mars is going to be one of His priorities. There is enough to discover in the soul and its relationship to God to keep a person busy for many life times. As for me, it’s nice that God allowed us to have the Hubble telescope; there are some quite beautiful things to see out there that reflect His glory, but I already felt that way by looking at the array of stars visible from earth with the naked eye. For those who are looking to make an important discovery, discover God. That is what we are meant to do.
      “Question 1: What is the chief and higest end of man?
      Ans. Man’s chief and highest end is to glorify God, and fully to enjoy him for ever” (Westminster Confession of Faith).

      Report this comment

      Witness1974  
    • HOOT_OWL
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 4:27pm

      Witness1974 Well said.

      Report this comment

      HOOT_OWL  
  • ssortors
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 3:29am

    is it me or is there a statue of a naked chick with boobs on the bottom of the pic… or is it just me that sees shapes on mars and think there all alien in origin :P

    Report this comment

    ssortors  
  • rochrealtor
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 12:36am

    He likes talking about himself too…must have gone to Lib school with the great one!

    Report this comment

    rochrealtor  
  • rochrealtor
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 12:34am

    I love science…I don’t understand how they went so far with so much equipment to see 10″ of water!! “Where’s the Lake”

    Report this comment

    rochrealtor  
    • drs1969
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 2:12pm

      It was a ‘lake’ so they would get the funds from DC. Just like ‘The Sky’s Falling!, Global Warming’, so they can get everyone used to $10+ for a gallon of gas. Then they can take more of our money. Just another scam from DC.

      Report this comment

      drs1969  
  • Fenrirsulfr
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 12:32am

    Beware the Old Ones!

    Report this comment

    Fenrirsulfr  
    • DZ-015
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 9:03am

      The Old Ones are at the Antarctic Mountains of Madness, not the Lake of Lunacy.

      Report this comment

      DZ-015  
  • Jetlander
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 12:18am

    I must ask about the cost of this little exploration under the ice. I can’t imagine for a minute the cost would justify the potential scientific knowledge gained. Boy o’ boy are our priorities screwed up!

    Report this comment

    Jetlander  
    • KickinBack
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 12:54am

      Because knowledge is priceless. I for one, would rather have the funds go to actual scientific exploration like in this article, rather than into welfare programs where it will be wasted.

      Report this comment

      KickinBack  
    • Witness1974
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 1:39pm

      Kickinback: The average government “scientist” can’t pour water out of a boot with the instructions written on the heal. Even if they manage to sometimes stumble onto something they generally misinterpret it. I would rather the money stay in the hands of the people who earned than to go to either welfare or government backed science.

      Report this comment

      Witness1974  
  • Akridgerunner
    Posted on March 2, 2013 at 12:00am

    There’s a lot more to this than what they’ve put here. I put in and ran the first camp that started this program off in 1983 and worked in the area a number of times after that. We drilled to the bottom of an ice stream and found ‘mud’, which was a first. Ian Whillans was an excellent glaciologist involved in this program and who passed away from cancer some years back. He was an excellent and dedicated professional and a good friend. This little blurb is not doing the program justice at all. Stay tuned I’d hope for more substantial information or do some homework on google scholar or the USAP website if you are genuinely interested.

    Report this comment

    Akridgerunner  
    • Goldmember
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 5:14am

      Like what? Finer, cooler mud? Mud you can use to tale a wrinkles out of your behind? As my mudda in law says, get a grip!

      Report this comment

      Goldmember  
    • Witness1974
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 6:40pm

      I would expect them to find remnats of tropical plants at the very least.

      Report this comment

      Witness1974  
  • whitealaskan
    Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:55pm

    The National Aeronautics and Space Administration drilling under glaciers that’s funny.

    Report this comment

    whitealaskan  
    • Akridgerunner
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 12:03am

      Not unusual at all. NASA has been heavily involved for decades in drilling of ice streams and ice shelves in Antarctica. They also send rovers under the shelves to explore the bottom of the ice. Look at their website.

      Report this comment

      Akridgerunner  
    • drs1969
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 2:16pm

      Remember the Muslim Outreach? Muslims are Space creatures,too!

      Report this comment

      drs1969  
  • brigott
    Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:46pm

    Finding microbial life in a lake on earth (where we know that there is virtually no place without microbial life) is going to tell them where to look for life elsewhere in the universe?

    Typical evolutionist thinking, fo sho.

    Report this comment

    brigott  
    • drs1969
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 2:21pm

      Back when they started this venture, they didn’t even know about volcanic ‘smokers’ at the bottom of the Atlantic. I don’t know who discovered those, but that is far more important than this. This whole thing is suspect. If you set up a project, all the way down there, you can skim a lot of money and no one will be the wiser.

      Report this comment

      drs1969  
  • The_Almighty_Creestof
    Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:30pm

    Dat’s where dat super H2O came from dat healed da Waterboy!

    Report this comment

    The_Almighty_Creestof  
  • Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
    Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:29pm

    You know there is a bunch of rednecks out there saying “I bet there are fish there, and I am going to get em.”

    Report this comment

    Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra  
  • woodyee
    Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:24pm

    Someones gonna say it…before me…

    must resist…temptation…strong…fighting…

    ,,,fighting…overwhelming…must …ask…

    Did they find Jimmy Hoffa?

    Report this comment

    woodyee  
    • Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
      Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:30pm

      They didn’t find Jimmy, but they did find Waldo.

      Report this comment

      Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra  
    • KickinBack
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 12:56am

      C’mon woodyee. Did they find Jimmy Hoffa??? That’s not news!!…Oh no, you just made me say it!!! D’OH!

      Report this comment

      KickinBack  
    • Zipit
      Posted on March 2, 2013 at 8:24am

      No Hoffa, but they did find a thriving, bottom feeding culture, resembling the appearance of Obama, Reid, and Pelosi!

      Report this comment

      Zipit  
  • Salamander
    Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:18pm

    Send Joe Biden in there with his shotgun to stir things up a bit!

    Report this comment

    Salamander  
  • Stoic one
    Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:13pm

    Cool.. preparation for Io.

    Report this comment

    Stoic one  
  • Recceman90
    Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:11pm

    Looks like everything is dead down there….maybe global warming can correct that!

    Report this comment

    Recceman90  
  • banjarmon
    Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:11pm

    Who would have thunk…Water makes glaciers!!!

    Report this comment

    banjarmon  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In