The Curious Picture of an Apparent Unannounced Meeting John Kerry Had with a Controversial Turkish Dad

As Heard on Beck Radio: Wait Until You Read that Poem By One of Those Punished for Benghazi Lapses

Government

Sheriff Debunks Gun Magazine ‘Fallacies’ in This Viral Vid (Plus: His Response to Biden’s Shotgun Advice)

Mar. 1, 2013 10:50am Billy Hallowell

A video featuring Sheriff Ken Campbell of Boone County, Ind., is capturing the attention of gun enthusiasts who have consistently argued that capping magazine sizes will do very little to save American lives. In a 14-minute instructional and debunk clip, Campbell narrates why a ban on high-capacity magazine sizes is ineffective, showcasing — through examples — the idea’s purported deficiencies. In an interview with TheBlaze, he explained the video’s purpose and detailed his views on the current gun control debate.

When asked whether capping magazine sizes would saves lives, Campbell was forthright in sharing his views with TheBlaze.

“I think it’s a great fallacy to believe that it would,” he said candidly. “You’ve got a standard capacity versus a 10 round. From a citizen standpoint…all we’re doing is making it more difficult for [people] to defend themselves against bad guys.”

The sheriff also took aim at recent comments uttered by Vice President Joe Biden. While Campbell said he respects the politician, Biden’s statements about shotguns were simply silly, he argued.

“You don’t fire rounds of a shotgun in the air — and you don’t shoot them through a door. Where I come from that’s called crime,” he said of the vice-president’s controversial recommendations.

Sheriff Ken Campbell Tells TheBlaze About Magazine Capacity, Guns and Responds to Joe Biden on Shotgun Claims

Photo Credit: YouTube

Campbell also noted that bullets “aren’t magic” and that it could take more than 10 to stop a bad guy, particularly one who is fervent and dedicated to committing his or her crime. He said that those who break the law aren’t concerned with abiding by regulations, so creating magazine capacity restrictions simply doesn’t make sense. The law abiding will follow, but criminals, naturally, won’t.

“By limiting the access to standard magazines…I think you are restricting a good American’s opportunity to protect himself and his family,” the sheriff continued.

Additionally, Campbell defended the U.S. Constitution and said that the Framers were smart men who had the ability to profoundly look into the future. He dismissed arguments centered around the idea that Americans were never intended to have AR-15s and other such weapons.

The law enforcement professional compared improved gun technologies to advancement in free-speech tools like Twitter and Facebook. While the Founders couldn’t have imagined such progressed social media tools, the First Amendment surely still covers them just as he believes the Second protects so-called assault rifles.

“Our constitution has stood its test for more than 200 years and I think it can go for 200 more if we leave it alone and follow it,” he said.

Photo Credit: YouTube

If you can’t yet tell, Campbell, who also instructs firearms courses at Gunsite Academy in Paulden, Ariz., is a passionate proponent of the Second Amendment. So, when he was asked to narrate the aforementioned video project (produced by the Defense Small Arms Advisory Council) he was happy to oblige.

The goal of the video, which is divided into two sections — one focuses on magazine sizes and the other on so-called assault weapons — is to dispel gun fallacies and misconceptions. The second portion of the project has not yet been released.

It attempts to address apparent magazine capacity myths, while also providing practical examples surrounding why these initiatives aren’t as beneficial as some politicians claim. The clip opens by introducing the issue with some text slides, then it moves into video evidence, showing what happens when different guns and magazine sizes are used.

Of particular note, it seems to debunk — or at least challenge — the notion that a reload of magazines (pending a cap on the number of bullets one can hold) opens a window of opportunity for someone to tackle an assailant. Experienced shooters are shown to be too quick to allow for enough time for a tackle. However, some would argue that an inexperienced gunman might struggle more with this, providing a wider opening for action.

The clip concludes by noting that proposed magazine size changes don’t truly pass “the common sense test.” Watch it for yourself, below:

Funded by Mark Westrom, owner of ArmaLite, a gun manufacturer, the video was filmed in Feb. Campbell, a police officer since 1979, made it a point to note that he wasn’t paid for the project and that he narrated the video out of love for the Second Amendment. He hopes that viewers will watch it and, based on the information, make an educated decision for themselves regarding the magazine capacity issue.

–

More Stories You Won’t Want to Miss:

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (136)

Beachmastermax
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:18pm
That is only a crime if you are found to be sane. Joe Bitme has been preparing an insanity defense right before our eyes for years.
Log in to ReplyReply
- michaelmoron
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:37pm
  Please People. Wake up to who these “Representatives” are.
  
  They do not represent the People. They work for the International Banksters.
  
  People warned us.
  
  “Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of today.”
  – Theodore Roosevelt
  
  “This [Federal Reserve Act] establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President Wilson signs this bill, the invisible government of the monetary power will be legalized….the worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill. From now on, depressions will be scientifically created.”
  – Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr., 1913
  
  “When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure. Every effort has been made by the Fed (Reserve) to conceal its powers but the truth is — the Fed has usurped the government!”
  – Congressman Louis McFadden
  
  “The real truth of the matter is that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
  – FDR
  
  Report this comment
- banjarmon
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 1:15pm
  Is NOT the Constitution the Supreme Law of the land??
  Does the Constitution supersede All state laws??
  If It dose, Is NOT every gun law written, that INFRINGES ON OUR RIGHTS TO OWN AND BEAR ARMS after the Constitution was written, UNCONSTITUTIONAL??
  
  Report this comment
- tonypro
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 2:07pm
  Well put together, and unbiased test platform.
  
  I just hope it doesn’t turn into, “we didn’t realize lower capacity magazines were as dangerous, so we want them all now”
  
  Remember this is the mentality of these criminals. Let us not forget D. Freinkenstein comment, “if it were up to me I’d tell Mr. and Mrs. America, turn in your guns.”
  
  Report this comment
- michaelmoron
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 2:20pm
  I am so sure that these criminals in D.C. have no standing, that I am going to purchase a
  S & W 9mm tomorrow, with a 15 round capacity.
  
  Of course, I will buy an extra mag or two. lol.
  
  iii
  
  Report this comment
- Cemoto78
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 3:41pm
  Sheriff Ken, your a good man and a very effective public servant. I’d vote for you to be sheriff without hesitation.
  
  Report this comment
- dirigo
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 4:18pm
  In order for Agenda 21 to take control they need to disarm us first!
  
  Report this comment
- Trigus
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 4:48pm
  We have Joe “Shoot the Door” Biden: fire warning shots from your porch or just shoot thru the front door.
  
  Home Land Security – use a pair of scissors
  
  Nancy “I’m not smarter then a Lima Bean” Pelosi trying to ban “Assault Weapons” and High Capacity Magazine without a fact to support her case.
  
  Louis Farrakhan – Saviors Day speech: “The Second Amendment has no relevance to the black community in this sense,” he said. “All your weapons are illegal, and you’re using them like a savage people.”
  
  I blame us all for electing and re-electing these people over and over into office.
  
  The distinctions between Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, and Independents are no more. I Am Not A Republican, But An American!
  
  Report this comment
- thorenshammer
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 6:31pm
  Remember,Obama and the liberal democrats are NOT INTERESTED in protecting any citizens constitutional rights and wants a TOTAL BAN on all legal firearms as well as the gutting of said Constitution. How else can he retain control over the American people and extend his leadership (sig.) after his second term is up…
  
  Report this comment
- muffythetuffy
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 6:47pm
  IT IS QUITE CLEAR THAT THE POLICE WILL BE ON THE SIDE OF THE RENEGADE REGIME IN WASHINGTON AND THE ILLEGAL ALIENS.
  
  This is why your local police are obtaining armored vehicles, hollow point ammo, and drowns. You are the enemy not the illegal aliens or renegade illegal government. They do not intend taking prisoners. They have increase their purchased of weapons and armor not more ambulances and first aid.
  
  Report this comment
- RabidPatriot
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 6:49pm
  I agree with the argument that the magazine restrictions are pointless, but Jim (the 1st shooter) was sandbagging the first line of fire. They are also doing something that takes practice and few people that are in a shootout actually do, counting rounds and doing tactical reloads with a round in the chamber. Most people just pull the trigger until they run out of bullets and then reload.
  
  Report this comment
- muffythetuffy
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 7:06pm
  ANTI GUN LIBERALS AND GOVERNMENT COMMUNIST DO NOT CARE, ITS ABOUT CONTROL NOT GUN CONGROL
  
  Not on Senator or Congressmen who is already against guns would care about facts.
  
  Report this comment
- DeOppressoLiber
  Posted on March 2, 2013 at 12:53am
  12 shots in under 3 seconds with a six shot revolver. Watch the reload.
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLk1v5bSFPw
  
  Report this comment
Seagal45
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:15pm
They have no right to tell us how many bullets our magazines hold, it takes as many as it takes. Common sense has gone right out the window.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- TyrannyNoMore
  Posted on March 2, 2013 at 10:45am
  Agreed ! Would you let some politician tell you you can not keep a large capacity fire extinguisher in your home ? I think not !
  
  Report this comment
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:11pm
I think this video will hurt gun owners. It clearly demonstrates that firearms with any capacity magazine can move a lot of rounds down range in a very short period of time. The anti-gun folks can use it to say: “See. See. This video proves that any firearm that permits multiple shots without having to reload is just too dangerous. We need to protect the children.”

I just have a bad feeling about this. People who are emotionally driven about gun control will view it as making their case.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Silvertruth
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:34pm
  I don’t agree. It’s a semi-valid video and needed to be demonstrated to stop the current style bans. What you’re saying though is it forces gun control debates to the ‘end game’ and yes, I agree and wholeheartedly support it doing so.
  
  The current gun debate isn’t about mass killings, it’s about fear of guns and government power vs. freedom and responsible gun ownership. That is the crux of the entire debate and all of these ‘thin edge of the wedge’ gun control laws don’t do anything but weaken the resolve of fence sitters who tire of hearing the debates. That’s why these laws are proposed and the fearful or power hungry crowd knows it, they want all guns to magically disappear. It’s not reality, but it is what they want.
  
  Where the video fails (making it semi-valid) is they intentionally fire slower on the larger capacity magazines and fire faster on the smaller ones. This brings methodology into question and makes the video open to criticism. This is a mistake on the Sheriff’s part. They should’ve fired the same speed in all instances because it’s hard to explain bullet counting delays to the public (which is the only reason why someone might fire more slowly with a high capacity magazine).
  
  The debate we should be having is what we are going to do about epidemic violence in our country, not about guns, knifes or other weapons. If the violence is dealt with, the tools that are used for it aren’t used for it any more.
  
  Report this comment
- Chukums
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 2:58pm
  I noticed this too. I also noticed that on some of the multiple mag runs, the bullet count was off in each mag, while they still totaled 30. However, the point is still valid and made in the video that having to change mags doesnt slow you down as far as total rate of fire. Also it proves that the reload window isnt enough for an unarmed takedown of an assailant.
  
  Report this comment
- sfcgkw
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 4:31pm
  Chuckums: When they were shooting, they shot one less than the magazine held so they would not have to re-**** the weapon. By using this technique they were able to save considerable time during reload. If they would have shot until they ran out (like they did on their last magazine of each run) they would have had to reload and re-**** the weapon.
  
  Report this comment
- HI_Don
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 4:47pm
  @Chukums,
  No, the bullet count was not off on any of the magazines. Take a look at the receiver action on each round of fire. The shooters intentionally did not fire the last round of each magazine until after the magazine swap. This prevents the weapon from locking back the slide when the magazine is empty. By leaving the last round in chamber and swapping the empty magazine before expending the next round they are able to do two things – not loose time to cycling the slide and two keeping the gun ready to fire during the magazine swap – which is another reason a trained shooter cannot be taken out during a magazine swap.
  The Sheriff did do some disservice by having the large magazines fired at a slow rate, that did call into question a bias in the video “test”.
  My issue is with this part of the article:
  “Of particular note, it seems to debunk — or at least challenge — the notion that a reload of magazines (pending a cap on the number of bullets one can hold) opens a window of opportunity for someone to tackle an assailant. Experienced shooters are shown to be too quick to allow for enough time for a tackle. However, some would argue that an inexperienced gunman might struggle more with this, providing a wider opening for action.”
  What all this magazine size debate has done is tell our future nut jobs what they have to practice or overcome in their planned shootings. Like wise, I hope us self-defense focused folks learned a great lesson on magazine management.
  
  Report this comment
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:56am
The anti-gun mob will pee their pants if they see how many rounds can go down range in 25 seconds.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Fubared
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:59am
  Faint teats up sucking wind when they noted how many well placed rounds in that 25 seconds.
  
  Report this comment
- Silvertruth
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:16pm
  No, they are already peeing their pants over their fear of firearms which is why we have gun control proposals to begin with.
  
  This is all about fear of something someone else uses and taking it away from them. That is the simplest form of it.
  
  The louder someone cries out about gun control, the more afraid they are of firearms.
  
  Report this comment
- Dismayed Veteran
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 1:31pm
  SilverTruth
  
  I guess I have a hard time understanding why a person is afraid of a gun instead of the bullet or shot that kills or wounds.
  
  Report this comment
- Silvertruth
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 1:49pm
  Dismayed-
  
  Well, I’m not sure I’d even fear the bullet or the wound. Those are consequences of action. Someone pointed a firearm in my direction and pulled the trigger. So it’s all about the action.
  
  We don’t demonize (in fact we sometimes praise) valid, lethal, action if it’s to defend someone or something precious. When criminals are shot and either wounded or killed they “get their just reward” but when an innocent gets shot and either wounded or killed it’s “tragic”. The weapon has not changed in either instance but our perception of worth of the life impacted is radically different. That’s based on choice. A person chooses to become a criminal, no matter how much ‘justification’ pyscho-babble garbage their is out there, it is a choice. Innocent people didn’t get a choice, they just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. So choice is everything.
  
  This choice logic is what makes the US different from almost every other country in the world, even Australia. Here we celebrate freedom of choice. Everywhere else, choice is a ‘granted’ perk, not a right. This is why gun bans, and all the politically correct garbage does so well everywhere else but gets opposition here in the US.
  
  We can’t necessarily choose what makes us afraid, but we can choose what we do about it. Do we change ourselves to overcome our fears or do we try to force our change on others to reduce/take care of our fears? It’s a choice.
  
  Report this comment
Thighmaster
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:44am
Makes Me proud to be a Hoosier….

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- GuruMeditation
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:16pm
  Big Kudos to Mr. Campbell! He is my local sheriff. He also teaches classes to the civilians at the local jail facility. Proud of BCPD! No nonsense. :-)
  
  Loud applause!
  
  Report this comment
- A Hoosier Says
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:28pm
  He is my sheriff too, Guru. The classes they give at the jail are actually quite popular. People come from surrounding counties to participate.
  
  Report this comment
- grimmster
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 3:13pm
  Cant say im proud of my sheriff,hes a democrap,has had his picture taken with odummbass, and is black, not good odds if you expect him to uphold the constitution oe the second amendment, here in Travis county Texas…….
  
  Report this comment
- 338lapua
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 7:30pm
  Grimmster………the local sheriff here is a black “democrat” Named David Clarke. He is a great law and order sheriff, You may have seen the PSA’s he is doing :). I think it is really appropriate that County level Sheriffs are pushing back like this. It just seems like this is what a sheriff SHOULD DO. I learned to shoot tactically with several of the local deputies here, never been so challenged and had so much fun.
  
  Report this comment
BlasberryStrat
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:43am
There are already “hometown” machinists designing and building easily accessible mags. for anything you want, and they have been doing it for years. Hell, we have a couple that are even anodizing their mags., barrels, and other equipment to what ever color you want. Feinstein cannot get around the home builds being sold “underground”. Just like the many who make and sell homemade M80′s. There will always be the “local good ol’ boy” who can build a tractor out of some tin foil, bubble gum, and a Q tip.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Alabaster
  Posted on March 4, 2013 at 12:25pm
  Agreed! I know of a guy that can, and has, fabricated some amazing “things” in his garage based machine shop. Kind of reminds me what happened during prohibition…. People are resourceful, if there’s a will, there’s a way.
  
  Hey MORON libs: a ban wouldn’t just make the said weapons and mags dissapear. Last I checked theres almost 300 million 30 rd AR mags in the US currently. Not to mention you can get just about any illegal substance on a street corner, no matter how illegal it is…
  
  Report this comment
ginger100
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:35am
I think fienstien and democrats are really counting on law abiding citizens to be honest and not be criminals and turn our weapons over to them while they don’t have to be honest and carry on with their criminal behavior.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- toto
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 3:17pm
  Someone needs to ask Feinstein if, at such time a total gun ban became law, if she would, on the spot, give up her concealed carry weapon AND her armed protection and never be protected by guns again AND if she would apply those principles immediately to her children and grandchildren in all situations as long as she, they are on US soil. Oh, and I would also require that a signing party be held immediately afterwards in Chicago’s South Side, with her entire family present. She is a monumental hypocrite, as are 99% of the leftists.
  
  Report this comment
Rocky_biskit
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:32am
How can anyone after watching this claim, that the “end game” is not, total gun confiscation?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- SageInWaiting
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:16pm
  The goal is to confiscate ALL firearms from law abiding citizens. This proves their plan as flawed… are these demonstrations just moving them to their next logical step?
  
  Report this comment
- GuruMeditation
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:30pm
  It pretty much cuts to the chase doesn’t it?
  
  Report this comment
- Rocky_biskit
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 2:56pm
  My point is that, those on the Left very well know, that the amount of ammo or whether it is semi-auto or not has no bearing on the end result of a mass shooting. The “New York reload” will be the method in the final end and that will be their “logical” proof that all guns need to be banned.
  
  Report this comment
- carbonyes
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 3:49pm
  SAGEINWAITING
  Their plan is not flawed. It is what it is. These no good SOB’s like Diane Finklestein, and the rest of the rabid dogs who have been bit by liberalism, which is a head disease, where they believe that they know what is best for us because we do not know what is best for ourselves, and this is in every realm and facet of life.
  These hooligans have sold us out and are already in the process of implementing the control and power grab of Agenda 21 under the auspices of the UN, dear George Bush the elder authorized the United States to buy into in the early 90′s as part of the New World Order. The plan of the elitist Progessives began way back when, but achieved its major initial thrust under President Wilson, a d it’s founding power machine was the establishment of the Federal Reserve.
  We are to be their ponds as long as we are useful to them. We have been building their war chest since that time through both the income and social security taxes.
  The elitists know their time is running out because they have overloaded the system, which dear Obammy has accelerated since they brought him on board. The bottom is about to fall out and can not be stopped. As a result, pandemonium will be rampant. Therefore gun confiscation is imperative for them to save their asses.
  Wake up Americans for the time has come to where “we all hang together, of we all hang separately. Do not give up your guns, and do not permit them to be registered.
  
  Report this comment
Skeeterhawk
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:25am
Just too much logic here for the gun haters and gun owner haters. Check this proposed senate bill from the haters in the Colorado senate.
http://www.leg.state.co.us/clics/clics2013a/csl.nsf/fsbillcont/28EB8FECB7D3F79387257B03007B8F72?Open&file=196_01.pdf

http://www.leg.state.co.us/clics/clics2013a/csl.nsf/fsbillcont2/28EB8FECB7D3F79387257B03007B8F72?Open

Would ban virtually every gun in Colorado. Its called the “ASSAULT WEAPON RESPONSIBILITY ACT”.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
davidwjohnson
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:25am
Most of you probably haven’t read Sen Feinstein’s bill.

In her bill it will be mandatory for everyone to wear track shoes at all times and practice 5 sets of wind sprints 3 times a week.

So you see, we don’t need high capacity magazines.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
AlansTigg
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:20am
my only issue is the guy is firing quicker when he goes to small mags, doesn’t change the stupidity of limiting capacity, but is a bit disingenuous for the demonstration

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Polarized America
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:38am
  .
  ya i agree, and as a pro-gun guy, i can pick this demonstration apart on many points…..
  ….so i’m sure the anti-gun comments are going to come in 3…2…1…..
  
  Report this comment
- davidwjohnson
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:46am
  In a live shooting, your observation would most likely be statistically irrelevant.
  
  The assailant would have the element of surprise and thus catch everyone else off guard. The time it would take someone in the crowd to calmly and logically ascertain the situation, the shooting would be over (provided the assailant shot this quickly).
  
  The point of the exercise is to demonstrate the negligible time it takes to replace magazines.
  
  There are too many permutations to arrive at a safe solution. Because of this, this demonstration reasonably postulates you can not quantify a favorable outcome for less victims banning high capacity magazines.
  
  Take away high capacity from the assailant, and it takes him 1-2 seconds to reload.
  
  Take away high capacity from the conceal carry, and it takes them 1-2 seconds to reload, or MAYBE they don’t bring multiple magazines or can’t get the job done in one standard magazine.
  
  Report this comment
- HOOT_OWL
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:53am
  I agree ,also they didn’t empty the gun . They always had one in the chamber ,so they could pick up where they left of instead of having to chamber a round every time. I know I’m splitting hairs ,but this is a test on ‘time’ difference.
  
  I know they do it for ALL magazines.
  
  But the more you have to change out magazines ‘the more time saved‘. If the difference to chamber a round( for sake of argument)
  (is .5 sec to chamber a round) we would have to ADD .5 seconds
  for every magazine change. Knowing first the gun has 1 magazine in and ready.
  
  ( 1 ) 15rd mag change = .5 x 1 = .5 added
  ( 2 ) 10rd mag changes = .5 x 2= 1sec added
  ( 4 ) 6rd mag changes + .5 x 4 = 2sec added
  
  Report this comment
Tom K
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:17am
(1) The Constitutional Sheriffs of America are doing a fine job by adhering to their Oath of Office. It is past time for all branches of Our Federal Government to take their Oath to God, Country and the Constitution seriously Or be FIRED.
(2) A young man in Texas had to fend off Three home invaders and did so, killing one. If he had Joe Biden’s Two shot double barrel shotgun, he would have had to reload, possibly getting shot in the process. Do Not Take Your Home Security Advice From Puddin’ Head Joe Biden. ( One heartbeat away from the Presidency )

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- woodyee
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:30pm
  See 14th Amendment, US Constitution, Section 3.
  
  If only we had leaders with the spines to enforce the Constitution.
  
  Report this comment
- AbrahamsSheepdog
  Posted on March 2, 2013 at 9:59am
  Time us good guys get together somehow, do something, we got skills, brains, & heart.
  
  Report this comment
HOOT_OWL
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:17am
Anyone else notice they always had one in the pipe ,every time they changed out the magazine so they didn’t have to chamber a round .

I’m just pointing out what the anti-gun touting commies will.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
ginger100
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:16am
That was a good read, why can’t all our elected representative be just as smart. Why are unpatriotic nutcases that I wouldn’t trust with my wallet like pelosi, reid, waters, biden even allowed to be in office?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
WeStateMedia
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:15am
The more we keep debunking the uninformed leftist of their fallacies, the stronger the hordes become. Soon they’ll be pushing for single round firearms only if we keep showing them why their laws are ineffective.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
AbrahamsSheepdog
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:13am
where’s the Rand Adds at? Anyway crazy clown mafia sure are out to hurt us. 19-20 on 2 different guys on PCP I think. Granted I also believe they were 9mm but 1 took 19 and 1 took 20 rounds… come on you sheep Wake the F up.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
SpankDaMonkey
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:12am
.
I have a .357 revolver I can reload in under 2 seconds, and it only holds 6 rounds…..

It is not hard to Debunk BS…….

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Fubared
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 1:04pm
  Dat be a fast monkey-
  
  Report this comment
Oath-keeper
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:11am
Nice, now show a domonstration with a capable concealed carry individual drawing from concealment and eliminating the threat. 911 is at least 15 minutes away one could re-lad all day long.

Oath keepers,org

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Ben__Franklin
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:10am
Notice no one in the Media is asking Jay Carney about Plugs-Biden’s gun advice. Were I live, shooting your shotgun off the back porch in the air gets you arrested. Where I live, if I were to shoot a shotgun through a door because I am nervous about who is ringing my door bell – it will get me arrested and charged with Manslaughter and a probably 20 other different charges.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
woodyee
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:08am
What I find most surprising, is that Billy is on a Mike Opelka story, because aside from the Church, Billy is usually doing stories on the perverts of the homosexual mob, and their desires. BTW, you earned your cap ‘B’, Billy! Lol!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
civilwarcometh
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:04am
The latest edition of the al Qaeda English-language magazine Inspire is out today. A digital copy of the magazine, provided by MEMRI (the Washington D.C. based Middle East Media Research Institute), shows a “Wanted: Dead or Alive” feature on page 10 of the new issue.

“Wanted: Dead or Alive for Crimes Against Islam,” the page reads. The list includes: Molly Norris, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Flemming Rose, Morris Swadiq, Salman Rushdie, Girt Wilders [sic], Lars Vilks, Stephane Charbonnie, Carsten Luste, Terry Jones, and Kurt Westergaard.

No further reason is provided to explain why these folks were singled out for the hit list, though many are notable critics of radical Islam.

“Yes We Can,” the image reads. “A Bullet A Day Keeps the Infidel Away.”

- See more at: http://weaselzippers.us/#sthash.EemgQRvV.dpuf YES WE CAN! http://weaselzippers.us/2013/03/01/al-qaeda-magazine-publishes-wanted-dead-or-alive-list-a-bullet-a-day-keeps-the-infidel-away/

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- woodyee
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:10am
  Now I know why Eaton The Cretin33 curry’s their favor…FEAR.
  
  Report this comment
13th Imam
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 10:58am
This will always be known by the ambulance chasing trial lawyers as the “Bite Me Defense”.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Fubared
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 10:57am
Here is a VA dude that was arrested for doing exactly what our VP advised. Exactly. The Biden defense should fill the courts.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/02/28/biden-advises-shooting-shotgun-through-door

Biden makes Dan Quail seem Mensa smart.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Gonzo
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 10:55am
Duct tape one magazine on top of another so all you have to do is is flip it over. Takes 2 seconds, tops.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Your_Senile
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:00am
  What you must know
  
  As I sit at my computer in my moms basement, contemplating out her only window, I dream of a day where she will let me move upstairs…..
  
  it is so
  
  Your Senile
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:10am
  100 mph tape Gonzo, it is a lovely OD green color too-
  
  Senile, carry on.
  
  Report this comment
- Gonzo
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:12am
  Thanks for your input.
  
  Report this comment
- 13th Imam
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:19am
  That’s funny
  
  You Are is contracted into You’re
  
  While the word ” Your” is a second person possesive adjective. It is sometimes used in the context of Your Majesty as a title of respect.
  
  You’re Senile Your Senile
  
  Report this comment
- GuruMeditation
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:22pm
  @Your_Senile: Hahahaha.
  
  Report this comment
- Anonymous T. Irrelevant
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:27pm
  Yeah, but he is senile, so he doesn’t know any better.
  
  Report this comment
- beeboop
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:46pm
  Trouble with that is, you can’t do that to a Glock style mag as the whole thing goes into the gun.
  
  Report this comment
lovenfl3
Posted on March 1, 2013 at 10:54am
How about that? Some sanity about the incedibly stupid reamrk from our Vice President. Thank you Sheriff!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- civilwarcometh
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:00am
  Look what happens when you take the VP’s advice.. http://weaselzippers.us/2013/03/01/virginia-man-takes-bidens-shotgun-advice-promptly-arrested/
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 11:12am
  Civil, we need to get together and quit posting over top of each other….
  
  Report this comment
- GuruMeditation
  Posted on March 1, 2013 at 12:31pm
  2nd that!
  
  Report this comment
- Bonnieblue2A
  Posted on March 5, 2013 at 9:00pm
  Ken Campbell is one of the good guys. I’ve been in more than one class on his range and shared a dinner table with him. He is a good Christian family man and and possibly the best example of what a County Sheriff ought to be in demeanor and commitment to Constitution as well as the safety of the people in his county.
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.