Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested
Doc Thompson’s 24-hour radio marathon, ‘#24forok,’ continues until 9 am ET — Listen Live!
New York Times Gives Its ‘Green’ Blog the Axe

AP
The New York Times has shuttered its “Green” blog, posting a message late Friday afternoon that its online space about “energy and the environment” was closing up.
A goodbye message went up at 5 p.m.:
The Times is discontinuing the Green blog, which was created to track environmental and energy news and to foster lively discussion of developments in both areas. This change will allow us to direct production resources to other online projects. But we will forge ahead with our aggressive reporting on environmental and energy topics, including climate change, land use, threatened ecosystems, government policy, the fossil fuel industries, the growing renewables sector and consumer choices.
In an email to colleagues obtained by the Columbia Journalism Review, former Green blog editor Nancy Kenney apologized for the “abruptness” of the cancellation and said the decision was handed down from management.
“Masthead editors at The Times informed me around noon today that they plan to discontinue the Green blog and devote resources elsewhere,” Kenney wrote.
The blog’s cancellation comes less than two months after the Times dismantled its environmental desk, reassigning editors and reporters to other areas.
The Columbia Journalism Review slammed the decision to do away with the blog, calling it a “horrible decision that ensures the deterioration of the Times’s environmental coverage at a time when debates about climate change, energy, natural resources, and sustainability have never been more important to public welfare.”
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.


















































































































Comments (59)
ShowMeState314
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 12:36pmGood! Kinda makes me wonder, though….. beside the money running out, maybe they just finished actually reading the whole Obamacare package and realized they couldn’t afford to employ the people needed to keep the blog running.
Report this comment
sam1064
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 5:49pmor maybe the got a conscience? Nah, I think they realize the public is wising up that so called man made climate change is a huge scam that has made despicable people like Al Gore rich.
Report this comment
starman70
Posted on March 4, 2013 at 7:58amI think it would be a lot better if the whold New York Times shut down. Just think of the trees that would be saved, the ink no longer wasted and the lesser load for the landfills as people would no longer have to discard that rag.
Report this comment
poster
Posted on March 4, 2013 at 9:07amNY Times a conscience? No way. It’s an “ObamaCare is coming” cost cutting move. Just wait until the low-info Progressive voters get the ObamaCare wake-up call in 2014…. I can’t wait. You’re going to hear, “What? I thought this was free!!”… Could end up doing serious damage to the Dems.
Report this comment
Warphead
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 11:58amThe idiot “green” people still don’t get it. All these “sympathetic” organizations and media outlets couldn’t care less about anything “green.” They jumped all over it when smelled “green” but the green they were smelling had nothing to do with the environment. Well, I have to correct that. Yes the environment they wanted green was the bottom line. And when their beloved leader Al (with a carbon footprint as big as some countries) Bore was realized as the cheating, hypocrite swindling, shiester that he has always been, was discovered, all these “sympathetic” organizations and the media started backing away from the green movement because it wasn’t bringing any more green-backs. And all the idiot, and I sincerely mean idiot, environmentally green people start walking around all upset because the big companies abandoned their one great cause. If they are so stupid to believe these companies cared for anything other than the bottom line then they would probably believe that man is causing the earth to warm and polar bears to drown. Oh wait, they are that stupid. And their leader Al Bore, guess what he did. He lied to them. He played on their fear, all the way to the bank. Wait & see what happens soon in regards to liberal, agenda driven, news slanting media reporters. I think they, their bosses and their way of doing things are about to be thrown out on their collective a$$e$. Liberalism at every turn is being discovered for what it is. A loosing proposition.
Report this comment
old construction worker
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 6:59pm“Wait & see what happens soon….”
CO2 and Trade may be dead, but I can tell you there will be a big push for a CO2 tax in Washington. It will not be push by the MSM so a lot of voters won’t know about. I look for it to be in big “Grand tax reform bill” or in some “grand budget deal”.
Report this comment
napari
Posted on March 4, 2013 at 2:49pmI completely agree with you except maybe you didnt go far enough. obama himself used the green energy vote to move forward and funnel bonuses to his campaign contributors and 100% betrayed those who were true believers! All obama voters slap your selfs with a sucker stamp!
Report this comment
RodT82721
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 11:21amSince the 2010 election, that free flow of money from the tax payers to the greenies has really been slowed down.
Those evil Republicans in the House, are demanding evidence of value received for money spent. It’s just ruining the entire green scheme.
When even the NY Times can’t pilfer from the US Treasury to fund the “climate change” propaganda, they have to shut it down.
They say using the resources elsewhere. That’s almost as funny as Barry paying for his own family vacations in Paradise.
Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 11:10amSometimes I like to search for key-words….
Green….. (b)log….. axe….. (news)paper…. LOL
Report this comment
shorelineliz
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 11:37amShould say: ……green……..blog…….global…….warming…….farse……..more…….polar……bears…….than……we……can……handle…….Al…….Gore……..sucks…….big………time………….lies……..ruined……..no…..money………EPA……sucks……scam
Report this comment
oneshiner
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 12:14pmRegardless of anything “they” say against our planet, I still trust and believe GOD is in charge of our Earth. Too many people in the greenie thingie are in it for the massive amount of money they’re making….fooling us.(Algore). GOD IS in charge of this planet, NOT man.. Sure, we need to be always vigil about protecting our home earth, but what “they’re” doing is money makin’ not earth shakin’.
Report this comment
ellietoo
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:35amWhy have an open forum on “green” environmental issues when you can control all input yourself? The NYT does not want open discussion on the issue. They want to completely control the conversation.
The “green” people have flooded NYS with activists trying to scare people into keeping all natural gas drilling out of the state. Not only have they stopped the state from gaining thousands of good paying jobs they have let down the failing businesses. These green job killers care nothing about the people of the state. They will put out any kind of unfounded information in order to obtain their objective. There is big money behind this green agenda.
Report this comment
neillevine3
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 12:42pmHard to gt word in edgewise in The Times. This just makes it harder.
Report this comment
DZ-015
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:28amThey may be making space for a new feature, the Soylent Green Blog.
Report this comment
Xanderson
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 2:08pmHahahahahahaha!!
Report this comment
Stoic one
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:14am“The Columbia Journalism Review slammed ”
The reason NYT closed the segment is NOBODY CARES except except the extremist loons.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:27amScience magazine use to be my respite from politics. I could read something that was mentally stimulating and technically informative & look forward to a better world.
Then the Green agenda invaded. The left finally found these magazine that before had been beneath their notice. Understandably I am pi$$ed. You cannot get away from these m0r0ns if you try.
The magazines will clean themselves up. But they came late to the party & will probably move on late also. It will be something they will not want to discuss or to be reminded of past positions.
Report this comment
Stoic one
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:58amI had subscribed to Scientific American for decades; and dumped it about ten years ago, because of it’s obvious slant. This became intolerable when they announced a ‘format’ change.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 11:33amI remember that Scientific American ran a feature story on Human Trafficking. It was so “noble” of them. Considering that Soldier of Fortune (SOF) magazine ran a similar story a few before SCIAM, you have to ask what SCIAM is worth? So they are biased and when they get to an important issue they are late and will advocate the wrong solutions. Like Samantha Powers’ R2P using ROE that ensure a heavy toll on the U.S. military that they would not deign to have “their” kids join. Shermer and his atheist antics is a real joy too.
My disgust with SCIAM led me to look for alternatives and I have found half a dozen science magazines other than Discover, Popular Mechanics, & Popular Science. The internet makes it easy.
$CREW the liberal doxy!
Report this comment
Stoic one
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 11:52amYou and I are like minded on this.
Report this comment
gyro
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:12amcry — cry — now were will I get the truth — cry — cry
Report this comment
lincolnhenry1860
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:03amWhen I was kid, they taught me the Earth was mostly a tropical environment thus allowing for the dinosaurs to live. Then they taught me about how the world cooled down and went in to an ice age. Then they taught me how the world warmed up again and cooled down again and so on and so forth. The answer is easy – God created a planet that slowly recycles itself and changes. God created a living planet in order to sustain life. It was the best idea ever!
Report this comment
Wakeup Maggie
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:12amYes, too bad Obama and his legion of dimwits think they can control Gods perfect plan
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:13amBINGO….And the sooner Libs go extinct, the better…….
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:02amTruth is people like some of those here followed wind power, solar power & other techs since the late 70s or early 80s to get off the grid & be independent of big corporations & the government
These same people will be following this stuff in a quiet manner 10 or 20 years from now.
The Sheeple will have moved on en masse herd by the like of Samantha Powers & Cass Sunsteen to new programs like R2P, Food Security etc.
Report this comment
Wakeup Maggie
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:01amAwww–NOOOOOOO–say it isn’t so!
Report this comment
ohiograndma
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 9:47amOh this is TOO interesting! The NYT jettisons the Green blog about Environment & energy, the one that scolds Americans for being selfish, destructive and wasteful. Meanwhile, many conservatives across the country are prepping and studying how to live off the grid, be more self-sufficient, employ permaculture techniques – all green & environmental in their own right, but not part of our all- controlling, parental government’s philosophy. As usual, liberals’ hearts are in the right place, but their heads are squarely up their — oh dear. Grandma doesn’t talk that way. But Grandpa does! ;)
Report this comment
shorelineliz
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 11:40amright on. Grandpa just tellin it like it is. This Seattle Grandma and Marine Corps Mom got no trouble with saying ‘put it where the sun don’t shine.” Raised by a rough talking WWII Combat Veteran who fought Hitler and Hirohito. Dad was a truck driver and Teamsters. Jimmy Hoffa’s daughter. Proud to say. Semper Fi OHio Grandma and Grandpa!
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 9:44am“But we will forge ahead with our aggressive reporting on environmental and energy topics, including climate change, land use, threatened ecosystems, government policy, the fossil fuel industries, the growing renewables sector and consumer choices.”
They’re not divesting – they’re diverting.
Report this comment
wilbstal
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 9:41amuse this blog for Obama impeachment news
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 9:33amPeople that believe in global warming are the same idiots that vote for a fraud like Obama…
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:05amThey do indeed and I call them warmer cultists,bunch of brain dead a holes.
Report this comment
geeman
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:09amagree. anyone who thinks u can controll the climate by signing some law is an idgit.what year was it when the climate stopped changing?
Report this comment
OneTermPresident
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 9:32amJust another “green” thing gone bust.. sooner or later they all do.
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:24amLove your avatar…
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 9:29amWhile you’re at it just close the times down all together,it’s nothing but a propaganda rag for the regime.
Report this comment
thibx
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 9:29amthey would not know the truth if it bit them in the ass.
Report this comment
Maximus_Delta
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 9:10amI heard that they will be changing the name of the paper to “The Obama Times”… all the news a liberal can shove down its throat…
Report this comment
Ironmaan
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 9:09amCould it be that they have decided to move away from writing fiction? I hope that idea spreads to the rest of the paper.
Report this comment
RIGS
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 9:08amWHO gives a $#i+ about THE TOILET PAPER TIMES.
Report this comment
Stoic one
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 10:19amI find it to be just a WEE BIT course…..if ya get my drift.
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 9:05amNo need for it, since a lot of their crappy nonsense is now being legislated.
Report this comment
mrmarkjohnson
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 9:05amThe blog only covered one side of the environment. It downplayed or ignored the mountain evidence against man made global warming that came to light in the past four or five years.
Report this comment
MisterSarcastic
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 9:00amSo the NYT is still a for profit business.
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 8:55amAre they getting rid of the entire “fiction” section, or just “green fiction”?
Report this comment
paulhawk
Posted on March 3, 2013 at 9:30amIf they did away with all the fiction Easty, there would be nothing left
Report this comment