Republican Gov. Rick Snyder in December 2012 accomplished the seemingly impossible task of turning Michigan, a longtime stronghold for unionized labor, into a right-to-work state.
However, in anticipation of the new law, which goes into effect on March 28, 2013, one union has approved of a deal that locks its members into paying dues well after they have a choice in the matter.
“Three Taylor Public School teachers … sued the union that represents them, the school board and the school administration over an agreement that forces them to pay dues or fees to the union for 10 years or be fired for not doing so,” Michigan Capitol Confidential reports.
Angela Steffke, Rebecca Metz, and Nancy Rhatigan allege that they were misled when the Taylor Federation of Teachers Local 1085 passed and the school district approved of a deal ahead of the right-to-work law that forces them to pay dues for another decade.
But with the help of the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation, the three are fighting get out of the 10-year “union security agreement” that expires in 2023.
“The decade-long extended payment requirement is outside the five-year contract the school board and union reached, which is a violation of the Michigan Public Employment Relations Act,” said Derk Wilcox, senior attorney for the Legal Foundation.
He notes that it’s illegal to have two separate contracts with separate expiration dates running at the same time.
“This is really a union insecurity clause because rather than proving its worth to members, the union is forcing all teachers to continue paying dues or agency fees through 2023,” said Wilcox. “This is a desperate attempt by the union to circumvent Michigan’s right-to-work law and preserve its own power at the expense of teachers.”
The Mackinac Center Legal Foundation offers a little background:
The district and union had been working without a contract since 2010, and the district was forced to file a deficit elimination plan with the state in light of a self-created $14 million overspending crisis. A new four-year contract was ratified in early February, along with a separate 10-year dues clause. Such clauses are generally part of an overall collective bargaining agreement, rather than a stand-alone agreement.
“The union is throwing teachers under the proverbial school bus with a contract that includes a 10 percent pay cut just to continue padding its coffers,” Wilcox said.
“This is the same union that thought it was a good use of its members’ dues money to spend $125,000 on the failed Proposal 2 ballot measure. The president of AFT Michigan got a 20 percent bump in total compensation. Our clients simply don’t want what the union is selling,” he adds.
Steffke says the union and the district “colluded and conspired to circumvent” the state’s right-to-work law.
“The so-called ‘security clause’ guarantees nothing for the teachers except that dues will continue to increase,” Steffke said. “Their money will continue to flow into union coffers, to pay inflated salaries of state and national union cronies.”
“This is about our civil rights,” she said. “This is about fighting for our freedom of association and fighting against coercion in the work place.”
Metz clarifies that she’s not “anti-union” — she simply disagrees with the idea of being forced into one.
“People should have the right to make their own decision about joining a union,” she said. “I understand our district is facing financial difficulties and the four-year contract can help solve that, but I don’t see any benefit to a 10-year union clause. I respect the TFT’s executive board, our negotiating team and my fellow union members, but I resent having my money used to prop up political positions and candidates I do not support.”

LANSING, MI – DECEMBER 11: Michigan State Police in riot gear push back protestors who are blocking a street during a rally at the Michigan State Capitol to protest a vote on Right-to-Work legislation December 11, 2012 in Lansing, Michigan. (Photo by Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)
The Mackinac Center Legal Foundation is urging the court to rule the insecurity clause as void, or “in the alternative that the clause only be found valid if it lasts for the same length of time as the four-year collective bargaining agreement,” the group’s press release explains.
“It’s as if the union has put teachers in a dues purgatory,” Wilcox said. “They’ve been sentenced to pay the union for an extended period of time or be fired. If the union truly cared about teachers, it would let them decide for themselves as per Michigan law, rather than treating them like children.”
–
Follow Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) on Twitter
Featured image courtesy Getty Images.




























































































































dmerwin
Mar. 7, 2013 at 2:19amThis is one of my basic disagreements with unions. What gives you the right to hire/fire? What gives you the right to FORCIBLY take money from people as a condition of employment? What gives you the right to confiscate wages of people who do not work for you and which you have NO legal lien against to spend on political candidates or causes for which they may not support? Would not their wages be higher if the unions not steal their wages? And finally why do union organizers get special preference in the Whitehouse? Who is working to support the scam? Sorry union workers you are dupes.
Report this comment
Moliminous
Mar. 6, 2013 at 3:08pmGolly gosh! I voted for them/him, and this is what I got! When you vote for tyranny, you get it. When you vote for zero-tolerance, you get it. When you for for stupidity, you get it. This is the moral content of the argument about the right-to-work.
Report this comment
Mess23
Mar. 5, 2013 at 8:57pmUnions are ONLY concerned about UNIONS!!! And Obummer, who funds unions.
Report this comment
zgomer
Mar. 5, 2013 at 4:06pmThat is what all unions want to do…
Report this comment
Micmac
Mar. 5, 2013 at 1:03pmAnd where do the children come into the debate? Teachers have lost their values. I have very little respect for teacher anymore, and I use to be one.
Report this comment
searcher619
Mar. 5, 2013 at 2:03pmGetting the unions out of the way is an important first step towards fixing our education system. Unions have been one of the biggest blocks education reform has been facing.
Report this comment
bartjoebob
Mar. 5, 2013 at 4:16pmPerhaps the great awakening is underway. Teachers and other govt workers will soon understand they exist solely to obey and support the union, an extension of Obama’s thug machine. These ladies did the right thing. Chicago style tactics don’t work in the Wolverine state.
Report this comment
Bulldog Kisses
Mar. 5, 2013 at 12:10pmThe union is showing their true colors; they are about making money/gaining power and control for themselves not looking out for workers. Experience has taught me this repeatedly. A pro-union fellow employee once told me not to work so hard because it “makes the rest of us look bad.” She loudly declared herself my “adversary” and followed up on the threat when I didn’t comply. IMO unions have made a large contribution to the erosion of the American work ethic. Kinda feel sorry for these teachers, however, when you lay down with dogs you get up with fleas.
Report this comment
iamnotu
Mar. 5, 2013 at 11:34amSimple work around for this union extorsion/cohersion, simply don’t pay the dues, get fired, and get rehired without the union. It would seem that the school administrators would do this if the teachers are good and they wanted to keep them.
Die unions DIE! Just a little more time and a couple more states to go right to work and these parasitic organizations will be no more. This will also eliminate the perpetual democratic control of several major (dying) cities in this country.
Report this comment
mrunner
Mar. 5, 2013 at 1:12pmI wish it were that easy. If they are rehired during the current contract, they will be bound by the terms of that contract. Don’t know if after the current collective bargaining agreement expires that would still hold true- but I don’t think the 10 year dues thing will hold up in court. In order for there to be a contract- there has to be consideration on both sides- in the case of the union teachers, when the labor agreement expires thy are no longer receiving any consideration so I think that added 10 year agreement will be tossed.
Report this comment
searcher619
Mar. 5, 2013 at 2:04pmIf you are no longer a member of that union nor are you employed through the union how is that binding in any way? I would expect the contract to be null and void after that.
Report this comment
MrKnowItAll
Mar. 5, 2013 at 10:59amUnion: Legal Criminal Enterprise.
Report this comment
cassandra
Mar. 5, 2013 at 10:23amwhen the teachers unions needed more money they raise your taxes while crying it’s for the kids BS it’s for their pensions and administrators that get paid while doing work for the UNION, tenure is nothing more than a ruse to get teachers to want the union job, WOW keep your job even if your lousey at it not to mention kids graduating that can’t even read or speak proper english public school is a discrace and the UNIONS have to be BROKEN and lets get back to education our children in Math,English,History,Reading and Writing and get rid of all those social studies classes that teach our children Marxism
Report this comment
LakeHartwellSailor
Mar. 5, 2013 at 2:53pmcassandra -
That is one LONG run-on sentence. Public school education?
Report this comment
curmudgeon60
Mar. 5, 2013 at 5:52pmCass….you are absolutely right, teachers can at retire at 52 and have wonderful lifetime benefits with out having to pay nothing or very little into health benefits.
To…LAKEHARTWELL…Must you make yourself superior in answering. We’re you perhaps educated in a Lutheran school. I’ve known a lot of your type there. Please try not to be snarky. ;-)
Report this comment
Army_of_One
Mar. 5, 2013 at 9:35amUnion members around the country need to fight for their rights. Quit these pathetic unions! DO NOT give into the thugs that are now running these unions. They no longer have your best interests in mind, it’s all about how much money they can make to contribute to idiots like the one we currently have running this country. Fight for your own rights. You are Americans, not sheep! Stand up for yourselves. You have the right to work, and you shouldn’t have to pay for that right. It’s legalized extortion. Don’t stand for it!
Report this comment
G-WHIZ
Mar. 5, 2013 at 10:07amCOMMIE-PROG-UNIONS have been ruining our economy for over 50years by keeping salaries so expensive that jobs left to go overseas. “THE UNION LABEL” WAS ALWAYS THE MOST EXPENSIVE IN THE WHOLE U.S.A.!!
Report this comment
MDECKER
Mar. 5, 2013 at 10:13amThe last and only time the union played a significant role was, in “Norma Rae”. Unions are nothing more than the legs the democrat party stands on. It has never, been about the kids either!
Report this comment
THX-1138
Mar. 5, 2013 at 9:14amGet a real job.
Report this comment
GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
Mar. 5, 2013 at 9:35amAnyone who reads SUPERMOB, a non-fiction on Sydney Korshak, knows what the unions are about.
Report this comment
Sargeking
Mar. 5, 2013 at 9:10amHere’s your wake-up call teachers. The teacher’s union exists for one sole reason, to protect the high paying jobs of the union thug leaders. Supposedly, most of you folks have a college education and you couldn’t see this coming? You make a private education look very inviting, indeed!
Report this comment
thegodfather
Mar. 5, 2013 at 9:00amYou vill pay your union dues…and you vill LIKE it!
Report this comment
Sargeking
Mar. 5, 2013 at 9:14amI like the Soviet inflection. Good post!
Report this comment
GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
Mar. 5, 2013 at 9:34amGerman is a sister language to English, W is pronounced like V. Est ist wonderbar
Report this comment
13th Imam
Mar. 5, 2013 at 8:58amSlavery? There you go Sheila Jackson Lee. Real modern day slaves. That haven’t been freed.
Report this comment
jackact
Mar. 5, 2013 at 7:58amTo think that this very state was the liberal bastion of organized labor no more than twenty years ago it quite encouraging to the free market and the future financial prosperity of our nation.
Keep up the good fight.
End union domination and finally get your seat at the table America.
Report this comment
Watcher1952
Mar. 5, 2013 at 7:58amThe Unions know they are losing the battle for members…..they bring their crony lawyers in…challenge or make new rules…then await the law suits which take’s money from the teachers….if not for these three brave women this would have gone thru…thus screwing a bunch of teachers. When Michigan went Right to Work I was happy….a good number of my fellow educators are happy also…..this isn’t over by a long shot…….it’s people like these women to stand up to the bullies……may take a LOCK & LOAD mind set…..beware America we are changing but not for the good of AMERICA
Report this comment
dont-care-anymore
Mar. 5, 2013 at 7:52amsimple ….. decertify
Report this comment
Sargeking
Mar. 5, 2013 at 9:15amPoint taken Good post!
Report this comment
DZ-015
Mar. 5, 2013 at 7:41amIf Michigan has passed a genuine Right to Work law, how can this issue arise? If the law specifically excluded existing contracts, then the teachers could be locked into paying dues for the four years the current contract of representation remains in effect (They should be able to get out of paying the percentage of their dues used for political purposes, though). Requiring the payment of dues for six years beyond the period of the actual contract certainly looks like “taxation without representation” so as to be void under any law that could truly be called Right to Work.
Report this comment
sta
Mar. 5, 2013 at 7:32amThere are some really good teachers. I suspect these ladies are three of them.
Union officials are sharks.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Mar. 5, 2013 at 7:31amWhere is KEATONC333 to support the union’s decision? Looking forward to seeing his comment here.
Report this comment
OldSurfRat
Mar. 5, 2013 at 7:42amMorning RJJ
But I thought that the unions were there to protect the workers?
Organized crime will shake down the weak until there are no more to shake down.
They are just like the left. Eat others until there are none and then eat each other.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Mar. 5, 2013 at 7:56amOLDSURFRAT, Morning. That is so true. The unions just fool some into thinking that. That is why I was thinking about Keaton. He really seems to express a “unions can do no wrong” attitude. I’ve had to join three unions at different times to even take the job. They did nothing but take money from each paycheck and if questioned we were told to shut up and take it.
Report this comment
Fubared
Mar. 5, 2013 at 8:03amLil Keatie is furiously flipping through its lil red book now.
Report this comment
OldSurfRat
Mar. 5, 2013 at 8:10amRJJ
The old saying “if it sounds to good to be true than it is”
Since I was 18 I have been saying that unions will destroy this country.
I took a lot of slack from union buddies but it looks like I was right.
Sad to think that an 18 year old stoner could see this comming yet others could not.
Report this comment
Ben__Franklin
Mar. 5, 2013 at 7:26amOnce again the Teachers Unions show its all about the Money and nothing about the Children they parade around their protests.
The Union Bosses do not want to loose their posh lifestyle off the backs of the Teachers.
Report this comment
jcldwl
Mar. 5, 2013 at 7:20amGood for those teachers. The unions are worthless crooks just like politicians.
Report this comment
ALL4FREEDOM
Mar. 5, 2013 at 7:18amThe sleepers are waking up!
Report this comment
KangarooJack
Mar. 5, 2013 at 10:07am:) take this as a sign of waking also.
Report this comment