Technology

Growing Trend of Marriages Over Skype Causing Concern About ‘Willy Nilly’ Unions and Marriage Fraud

A story in Tuesday’s New York Times sets the familiar scene of a bride and groom tying the knot as guests looked upon them. The very unfamiliar part though is that it was all being done over Skype while the bride, an American citizen, was in Queens, New York, and the groom in Bangladesh.

Proxy Marriages A Growing Among Immigrants

(Photo: Shutterstock.com)

According to the Times’ report, this “proxy marriage,” one where the bride and/or groom is physically absent, is part of a growing trend among immigrants, and it’s causing concern among some as it raises the potential of marriage fraud.

One company established seven years ago conducts 400 to 500 proxy weddings each year, according to the Times. Operations manager for the North Carolina-based company Proxy Marriage Now, George Andrews, told the Times it has seen a 12 to 15 percent increase in business each year. Some of these proxy marriages are for members of the military, but the Times reported the company saying non-military proxy marriages being up 40 percent.

With the potential for such a system to be abused, some are concerned about fraud from those seeking citizenship through marriage. The Times reported officials from the Department of Homeland Security saying a marriage over the Internet would most likely be flagged as suspicious in a citizenship review.

Still, Michigan State University College of Law professor Adam Candeub told the Times not having people physically present might negate the purpose of making sure both parties are entering into the union freely.

“There are some problems with willy-nilly allowing anyone around the world to marry,” he said.

Only a few states in America allow proxy marriages — California, Colorado, Texas and Montana. The marriage described by the Times is technically registered in Bangladesh because it is not legal in New York

Read more about the trend of proxy marriages taking place, especially in the Islamic culture, through Skype or Google hangouts in the New York Times’ article here.

(H/T: Daily Mail)

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Comments (12)

  • sizzlinsexybeckster
    Posted on March 7, 2013 at 10:52pm

    This is ridiculous and shallow. I’m sure the next window on their computer they will open will be on how to get a quicky divorce.

    Report this comment

    sizzlinsexybeckster  
  • Cavallo
    Posted on March 7, 2013 at 3:30pm

    Any man that gets married in this day in age is looking for trouble.

    Report this comment

    Cavallo  
  • battles
    Posted on March 7, 2013 at 8:54am

    Is there any way to kiss the bride over skype?

    Report this comment

    battles  
  • satman40
    Posted on March 7, 2013 at 1:04am

    With gay marriage that numeber can double..

    Report this comment

    satman40  
  • S.O.S
    Posted on March 6, 2013 at 10:52pm

    especially in the Islamic culture,
    ====================================================
    Don’t you think that statement alone should send up a few red flags

    Report this comment

    S.O.S  
    • bigdaddyt46
      Posted on March 7, 2013 at 3:37am

      yesw it does. this is going to be a huge boost to the child sicko peds to be able to “marry” a 6 year old in gualalampore. sick sick sick

      Report this comment

      bigdaddyt46  
  • Tomorrows_Thought
    Posted on March 6, 2013 at 10:08pm

    If a United Nations marriage treaty exist (probably will if not already)…Thank a progressive idiot for this insanity…They need to understand what they are doing to our society…

    Report this comment

    Tomorrows_Thought  
  • media-bias-steals-elections
    Posted on March 6, 2013 at 10:01pm

    In my view they should not be legal, neither should there be any reason why the law should be bent because people are not patient. Keep your pants zipped up and don’t mess with the locals and knock them up with babies? It also means the IRS will have unlimited powers in foreign countries to go after the assets of any previous marriages conducted this way?

    Why do we complicate our lives like this, do you think people won’t figure this out eventually?

    Stop this please?

    Report this comment

    media-bias-steals-elections  
  • gauge
    Posted on March 6, 2013 at 10:01pm

    The Times reported officials from the Department of Homeland Security saying a marriage over the Internet would most likely be flagged as suspicious in a citizenship review.

    Yah, but encourage and let them cross over the border illegally, and that is fine with DHS.

    This from the same people I predict in 5 yeas will make marriage between you and your pet legal

    Report this comment

    gauge  
  • M13
    Posted on March 6, 2013 at 9:49pm

    Does this mean Encinom’s marriage to his pet ewe is illegal?

    Report this comment

    M13  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In