
Organizers say this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference will be the most diverse yet, but women will still hold less than a third of the speaking slots. Former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, who delivered the keynote address last year, will speak again. (AP)
Thousands of conservative activists will assemble near Washington, D.C. next week to collectively heal from the disappointment of the November election and to find a path forward, away from a year that included accusations of a Republican “war on women” and saw the largest election gender gap in recorded history.
And yet after female voters broke for President Barack Obama by double digits in the fall, the number of women taking the stage at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference will be far outstripped by the number of men.
Of the approximately 250 speakers on the CPAC roster, only about 71 are women, American Conservative Union spokeswoman Laura Rigas told TheBlaze Thursday. Though she emphasized that the final number could shift, it’s a figure indicative of a movement that has sometimes been at odds with female voters.
Author and commentator Kate Obenshain, who will address the conference, said it’s a shame there aren’t more women being featured at one of the most high-profile conservative events of the year.
“I’m surprised they’re still including me because everywhere I go, I talk about the fact that there need to be more women prominently focused on this event,” Obenshain said on TheBlaze TV’s “Wilkow!” “We have so many great conservative women within the conservative movement, it would completely eviscerate the left’s argument of this fake war on women.”
Rigas noted that the number of female speakers scheduled for CPAC is up from 53 last year, as is the number of black and Latino speakers. In 2012, there were nine black speakers and 10 Latinos, compared to at least 15 black and 18 Latino speakers slated for this year, she said. In addition, half of the event’s emcees are women under age 40.

AP
Al Cardenas, the head of the American Conservative Union, which puts on CPAC, is no stranger to calls for the Republican Party to diversify. The day after the election, he himself said the GOP was “too old, too white and too male.”
In a statement to TheBlaze, Cardenas called this year’s CPAC “by far the most youthful and demographically represented” but said organizers didn’t use a “quota system” to determine who got an invite.
“ACU is well on its way toward the promotion of diversity in the conservative movement by highlighting men and women of color, Latinos, African Americans, Asians and our youth — through a true merit system,” Cardenas said. “By that we mean that their invitation stems from their actual contributions to the conservative movement and not based on some quota system.”
Some of the bigger women’s names scheduled to speak are former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte, Utah mayor and former congressional candidate Mia Love and Minnesota congresswoman and former GOP presidential candidate Michele Bachmann. South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley was on a list of invited speakers but, as of Friday, her attendance had not been confirmed.
To be sure, one of the biggest factors in the lack of female speakers is the paucity of nationally elected women. This year saw a record number of women take their seats in Congress with a total of 98 — 78 women in the House of Representatives and 20 in the Senate. In both chambers, female Democrats outnumber female Republicans.

Getty Images
Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), a confirmed CPAC speaker, told TheBlaze it’s an issue that needs to be addressed and that it goes beyond the conference.
“All of us have to say we recognize it is a problem that we don’t have as many women in the forefront as we would like,” Blackburn said. “While we have just dozens and hundreds of women at the local elected level and state elected level, we have fewer at the national level.”
Blackburn noted conservative women in general “come to the [political] process a little later in life.”
“They travel the circuitous route in their careers,” she said. “They have their families and they work in the private sector and they take time off to care for families and children and older parents, and then they circle back around to their jobs and careers and then they get to a point and generally choose to run for elected office.”
Crystal Wright, who runs the website conservativeblackchick.com and is also a confirmed CPAC speaker, said she’s not bothered by the overall lack of female speakers on the schedule because it simply reflects the reality of elected women in politics.
“One of the issues facing the party that we’ve all talked about, that everybody was up in arms about after Romney’s loss, is diversity,” said Wright, who will participate in a panel about the major issues facing conservatives. “Diversity includes women. However, we know women disproportionately aren’t running for office at the rate of men. They don’t. OK? So I think what we see reflected in CPAC isn’t unusual.”
The issue also is not simply a Republican one—the Obama White House faced scrutiny earlier this year after the president made a series of white male cabinet picks in Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, Secretary of State John Kerry and Treasury Secretary Jack Lew.
“They [CPAC] have a lot of women on that stage of all colors and ethnicity meanwhile Barack Obama’s struggling…none of these women he’s appointed have been appointed to really significant key cabinet positions,” Wright said.
She added, “People mocked Mitt Romney for asking when he was governor about binders full of women, but Mitt did the right thing because he wanted to see beyond his own personal experience and that’s really what this is all about.”
–
Related:
























































































































Comments (99)
sparkyrules
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:21amSometimes I think it’s a shame
When I get feelin’ better when I’m feelin’ no pain
Sometimes I think it’s a shame
When I get feelin’ better when I’m feelin’ no pain
Sometimes I think it’s a shame
When I get feelin’ better when I’m feelin’ no pain
Sometimes I think it’s a shame
When I get feelin’ better when I’m feelin’ no pain
Sundown ya better take care
If I find you been creepin’ ’round my back stairs-Gordon Lightfoot
Report this comment
EVANROOD
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:16amNot you Woody!
Report this comment
woodyee
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:44amI know! hehe!Thanks!
I like Sensei – I don’t think he’s Encinom, because they’ve different personalities. But Sensei (Wango) is consistent…
Report this comment
Zipit
Mar. 8, 2013 at 1:44pmWhere did WANG’S post go? I hate it when posts dissapear! It makes the replies look like they’re just hangin in the wind!
Report this comment
YOURSENSEI
Mar. 9, 2013 at 10:15amMr or Ms ZIPIT,
This is what you must know:
Yes . . . where indeed? It was the Reagan beat down that sent you off into hall monitor mode, wasn’t it. “Teacher teacher! Sensei hit me in the face with a dodge ball!” I don’t blame you. It was brutal.
It is so.
Report this comment
stumpygrim
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:09am@Ghost.
So true!
Report this comment
SendTheMeteors
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:07amYou may be on to something Sensei. I thought about it for awhile, and it occurred to me that maybe the fact that women and minorities vote overwhelmingly for Democrats may not be the result of the few women and minorities speaking at CPAC or the Republican Convention or anywhere else.
As I cogitated on the question, I wondered if the real reason women and minorities vote against Republicans actually has more to do with Republican policies. In other words, could it be that those groups vote for Democrats because they agree with them on policy issues?
My question though is not how many women and minorities speak at CPAC. That’s not what I’m interested in. My question is the proportion of women and minorities who attend. I think that’s the more important metric.
Report this comment
Zipit
Mar. 8, 2013 at 2:17pmMEAT!!! I believe a form of the word “vegetate” would be the more appropriate word for you to use! As in ; (or you should have said), “When pondering your sage and timely post, oh Great and masterful WANG, I found my thought process to be mired in an almost perpetual state of vegetation”! Yeah that works better for ya, and “I always wondered if the real reason liberal women and minorities vote against Republicans has to do with their continued vagitative state”!
Face it Meat, the majority of your liberal women and minorities couldn’t spell CPAC, let alone cogitate on their existence!
Report this comment
COFemale
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:05amDon’t confuse Conservatives with Republicans, we are not the same. I don’t know why CPAC is going anal this year. The fact that Romney lost by his own accord and Karl Rove was so wrong in his analysis apparently gave them a bad taste in their mouth and they apparently blame the wrong people for that loss. I don’t think it is so much of not choosing women, I think it is more of not choosing women who don’t fit their agenda. Democrats are no different. They bring in more women just to appear more in touch, they are tokens and very rarely listened too. And too ignorant to see they are being used. Democrats have their “good ole boys network” and Harry Reid is at the top of that chain. Don’t be ignorant Sensei.
And for the record, stop with the “This is what you must know:” crap. It makes you look like a know-it all arrogant B. You don’t get trophies on this site, so cut the bull crap and know it all attitude. In my experience those who BOAST to know things actually don’t know diddly squat. Continue at your own peril.
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:03amStumpy
Yeah, he just screams for attention, even if it’s bad. Nothing we can do about it, except shake our heads.
Report this comment
Tigress1
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:03amYeah, CPAC needs to start pandering just like the Democrats! Organize everyone into little groups, men, women, whites, blacks, Latinos, etc. Don’t pay any attention to the MESSAGE, just look at the category that they are placed in. That’s all that matters. Gotta have a certain number of each stereotype or you will be accused of racism, misogyny, etc. Hey, kill 2 birds with one stone! Just have a “girly man” speak and he can count as both a man and a woman. Better yet, have him be a half Hispanic/half black girly man and you can count him as belonging to each stereotype!
Report this comment
neverending
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:18amyeah – no kidding
Report this comment
Cavallo
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:58amMia Love, Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann, Michelle Malkin, Anne Coulter, Condi Rice, Vicki Hartzman, Rebecca Wales, Darla Dawald, Jenny Beth Martin, etc etc
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:02amStop playing the progressive game of looking at everything through the lenses of gender, race, ethnicity, or any other dividing characteristics.
Report this comment
Cavallo
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:25amWilco.
But I will likely quote you later on.
One more thing though, the Tea Party was started and pushed by mostly women.
“Face of the tea party is female”
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/35094.html
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:38amCavallo, mine was a general statement not directed at you personally. Sorry, you were on top and I just hit the ‘Reply’ button.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:39amBut, I do welcome all quotes.
Report this comment
13th Imam
Mar. 8, 2013 at 12:03pm“One thing our Founding Fathers could not foresee….. they were farmers professional men, business men giving of their time and effort to their dream and an idea that became a country………………… was a nation governed by professional politicians who had a vested interest in getting reelected. They probably envisioned a fellow (now a female also) serving a couple of hitches and then looking eagerly forward to getting back to the farm”
Ronald Reagan 1973
Report this comment
stumpygrim
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:55am@yoursinsei aka encinom.
You do know kid, you are truelly despised here, and no one gives a rats ass about your cheetos eating wow playing self.F-n moron………
Report this comment
COFemale
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:54amTo some degree it seems, they still have the “the good ole boy” mentality. They need to be more inclusive and if they ignore or discount the Tea Party candidates because it doesn’t meet with their agenda, they will see the RNC dwindle in donations. They forget we might support Tea Party candidates, but we also support some RNC candidates and we do vote Republican tickets. So if they want to alienate a great many people, they do so at their peril. I will not donate to the RNC until they start listening to me and get out of their “comfort” zone and good old boy attitude. Karl Rove is at the forefront and he will kill the RNC.
Wake-up CPAC.
Report this comment
termyt
Mar. 8, 2013 at 12:48pmSo what’s the number, then? What number proves they are not racist or misogynistic?
Do we get to check their credentials as conservatives before we rush to included them based only on gender or race? Wait, isn’t that what racism actually is?
Hey that girl just said something remotely conservative – quick sign her up for CPAC. That’ll prove we aren’t misogynists!” Actually, it would prove we are, just like the liberals who demean and attack any woman who is a Conservative.
Report this comment
EVANROOD
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:49amDude, pull the thong out of your *********, wooja!
Report this comment
woodyee
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:49am@Sensei
This is what you must know –
How to set a mainsail or operate a rudder –
Thereby, instead of uselessly contemplating ‘this is what you must know’s
you’d be useful helping The Capt. of The Ship of Fools and Hero of The Stupid.
It is so.
Report this comment
SpankDaMonkey
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:33am.
Sarah Palin is the RINO version of Joy Behar!!!!!………
Report this comment
stumpygrim
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:56amUh, wth do you mean spank?…….
Report this comment
GilbertAcct
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:26amI wouldn’t be worrying as much about too few women speakers as I would about Romney speaking. Why is this redistributionist buffoon being given a podium again?
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:41amBecause most “conservatives” are so compromised in their beliefs that at this point they really don’t know what a conservative is and isn’t. The left has done a real mind **** on them, that’s for certain. And God help a libertarian who mentions “Hey, you know, maybe you should start standing for something again”. Lordy. :)
Report this comment
JohnofOregon
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:41amI agree in part.
The two real problems are not mentioned in the story. White male voters broke for Obama.
Next is no mention of the fact that black an Hispanics consistently poll high in social conservative issues and actually vote that way. Example: consistency in votes for traditional marriage. Republican leaders still do not understand that fact. Instead they keep looking for ways to kick the base out of the party.
That’s the real problem.
Now combine it with all the rino’s that refuse to limit government. If you aren’t a social conservative like such as beck/cupp or a fiscal conservative like the speaker, then why aren’t you a democrat?
Report this comment
justangry
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:23amI don’t know any ‘conservative’ women. Perhaps Laura Ingram and a few posters on here. I mean you’d probably have plenty if you changed the name to neocpac. I guess Bachman is close, but there isn’t anyone in the ME she doesn’t want to bomb and not one right she isn’t willing to sacrifice for security. I don’t really consider that conservative… More like fascist. Palin is a neocon too. All the woman that believe in DOMA are progressives that have abandoned the enumerated powers of the Constitution. Who do you have left?
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:29amWell, my wife is libertarian, so there is that. But no, she cannot speak, I don’t want all the guys leering at her and being all icky.
Other than that…um…no idea. When I think “conservative” I usually don’t think “libertarian” when it comes to women, and the constant plea to pathos/emotion gets on my nerves after a while. While I certainly don’t want a stale dry droning voice delivering speeches (“Buhler….Buhler…”) I’m really sick and tired of hearing faint references to liberty surrounded by a speech that is 90% stories about feelings and fluff. If they do have to go on about emotions, give me the ones that matter most to me – triumph, pride, exuberance, confidence. Enough weepy time.
Report this comment
13th Imam
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:46amSeems NO woman, or few men, can approach Always Cranky’s view of perfection.
Report this comment
stumpygrim
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:06am@justangry aka encinom.
Try laying off the crack, and make a little sense once in awhile.And by the way, your use of the word neocon,takes any and all legitimacy out of anything you spew on here moron…….
Report this comment
Zipit
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:40amSTUMPY! Don’t make ANGRY, angry! He gets way too “ANGRY”!
Report this comment
mikem1969
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:15amWomen have been far to brainwashed by the left. Hopefully with all of the idiot dems showing their butts and telling women about rape and that they don’t need to defend themselves, more of them are waking up. Time will tell.
Report this comment
walnutportconservative
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:37amhey mikem,
You don’t have much faith in our women in America. I think the word “conservative” needs to be removed from this PAC. I think the problem is… wisdom tells all people to be careful about whom we are to make allegiance with.
Report this comment
PIGSWILLNEVERFLY
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:14amMost true conservative women are strongly next to and supporting their staunch conservative husbands and do not seek the “limelight”. My opinion, we need more males that will NOT wavier and women that raise their children in a SOLID, Loving, Nurturing home. Somehow, Sarah Palin was thrust into the limelight and is the standard of a woman who has, can and will do it all gracefully and full of fortitude and spunk. She is outstanding among women of today as is Michele Bachmann. Modern conveniences have freed women to do much more and still maintain a home as long as there is undying family support and encouragement built on moral foundations. G-d has blessed these women and I’m sure it’s not as easy as they make it look.
Report this comment
Palter
Mar. 8, 2013 at 3:21pmDude, Sarah Palin maintains home …. Moral foundations?! Are you taking the crack? Her daughter was pregnant out of wedlock! Her son got divorced in less than 2 years marriage, another daughter had a spat in internet using gay slur…. That’s what you call moral foundations at home?!
Report this comment
neverending
Mar. 8, 2013 at 5:06pm@PALTER – my sentiments exactly. Her son got the woman pregnant and finally married her and now yes divorcing her.
Report this comment
justiceday
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:13amWomen like to talk but most don’t take action, especially in America. Most women’s groups don’t do anything just collect paychecks on the government dime. Rape in the military is epic and it was in the media for two weeks then gone. Today is Women’s Day and most women don’t even know. And they don’t care. I agree that as long as your fighting for the right thing who cares how many women were there. If we aren’t going to support ourselves we should be thankful we have any support at all.
http://www.theusmarinesrape.com/HideTheTruth.html
Report this comment
Tri-ox
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:13amHuh? There is no “LACK of female speakers”. And, as we know, not every person (male or female) that is invited to speak at CPAC, accepts the invitation.
Report this comment
stumpygrim
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:08amOr,wants to be associated with progressive rinos either Tri.
Report this comment
woodyee
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:07amAmerican Conservative Union spokeswoman Laura Rigas should GTFO and get a job with the DemonicRats – THEY are the Quota Party.
Instead of blowing her azgas out of her neck-high poop-chute, perhaps she could have better spent her time showing a powerpoint presentation, wherein she could present CPAC with numbers indicating the appropriate percentage of race, ethnic, sexual orientation, gender and religion based speakers and why.
I’m sure it would have been interesting…azwipe…
Report this comment
Listen_then_think
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:06amSo? Who is making a big deal about it, liberals and feminazis. They are not conservative anyway so who gives a flying rat. And as gonzo said you don’t just throw any women in there to satisfy the minority, pick people who are literate, smart, qualified and conservative.
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:17amExactly.
The GOP is lost. They just INSIST on playing the progressives stupid games, always deluded despite reams of evidence to the contrary, that they’ll somehow gain favor with that bunch of snarky, sneering little toadies.
Report this comment
woodyee
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:31amIt could be that the Blue-Blood RINO’S want to compete with Obammy for the ‘stupid’ vote…
Report this comment
catty
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:04amWhat literate smart woman would want to take part in an event with Palin and Bachman?
Report this comment
gyro
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:27amcatty — gerrrrrrrrrrrrr ******
Report this comment
SpankDaMonkey
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:03am.
Sarah Palin needs to go Shoot a Moose, or work a Stripper Pole……
This Quitter Rinoette needs to go pimp herself & her family somewhere else…..
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:14amWell, I wouldn’t put it quite that way, but I’m not impressed by her quitting whatsoever, no matter what rationale she gave for doing it. You pull harder when things get harder, you don’t throw up your hands, offer tears and weepy sad faces and then give up.
I’m also less and less impressed with Bachman, though there’s still some hope from her corner I guess. And leave the Neocon worshipping Ann Coulter at home as well with her “scared of germs” breathing mask.
Michele Malkin would be a great speaker to add, she’s got fiery aggression in spades and she’s as hot as the day is long.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:15amDamn, somebody got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.
Report this comment
Buddynoel
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:15amAnd you need to get off your parent’s computer and stop surfing porn sites.
Report this comment
stumpygrim
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:03amOk, maybe ive been out of the loop too long, so what has Palin “quit”,the repub party, which is sinking anyway, or her job as gov. of Alaska,i dont understand?!……How about you enlighten me spank,this sounds a lot like your “Texas sucks” comment……..
Report this comment
SpankDaMonkey
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:28am.
Well Stumpy she is a RINO that is a Republican In Name Only, she is also a Quitter…..
Don’t think that is that hard to understand…….
And as far as my Texas Sucks comments when my 13 month old grandson was beaten over a Mickey D’s french fry and not one Texan stood up to help my daughter fight off his attacker. Well Texas Sucks…..
Report this comment
stumpygrim
Mar. 8, 2013 at 3:54pm@spank.
I’m still trying to see how Palin is a rino, and what did she quit, neither question you answered.And who is it the supposedly beat your 13 month old grandson,you havent elaborated on that one either,am i to assume it was just a passerby that did it? Something about your “story” doesnt hold water,maybe more info?……..
Report this comment
neverending
Mar. 8, 2013 at 5:08pmyep!
Report this comment
MCON29
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:03amWhen you break it down by Gender and Race you completely disenfranchise the rest of us who dont care. I will not be guilt ridden because I am a hardwoking, tax paying, White Male who does everything he is suppose to. Either you are American or you are not. You are either Conservative or you are not. Thats all that should matter.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:29amExactly. If we start thinking like the left, in 5 years we’ll be searching for a conservative, left handed, Asian, midget to speak at CPAC.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:02amWhy would they even want to? Anybody remember what the media and 0bama’s campaign shills did to the women who spoke in Tampa for Romney. They were pounced upon and dragged through the mud. It was absolute proof positive that the real war on women is from the left. So, why would any conservative woman want to be put through that. Fluked again!
Report this comment
Gonzo
Mar. 8, 2013 at 9:57amShould conservatives be worried about quotas? I don’t think so, get the best conservative speakers available.
Report this comment
gyro
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:01ammany are women
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:04amHear,Hear.Who gives a rip what sex or race they are as long as they believe in the Constitution and Liberty…
Report this comment
kaydeebeau
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:07amExactly Gonzo – and besides – I wish everyone would stop (hint Madeleine Morgenstein) CPAC is not a gathering of Republicans – it is a gathering of Conservatives who also happen to be mostly Republicans – Conservative and Republican are not the same thing. Mitch McConnell is a Republican – Rand Paul; Jon Cronyn is a Republican – Ted Cruz is a conservative. Note the difference?
Report this comment
Gonzo
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:08amSo, you think this is discriminatory then Gyro?
Report this comment
woodyee
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:21amWell-said Gonzo!
Great color-commentary, Kadee!
Report this comment
13th Imam
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:25amMy problem is with the shabby treatment of some women by our side. I expect it from the DEMOCRATS and their MSM Media wing. From the politically perfect Libertarians to the snobbish GOPers many women(Sarah, Michelle and others) get insulted for not fitting into their bubble perfectly.
Report this comment
gyro
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:30amStrong women will push to the front like the men
discrimination no
Gonzo there may be a good thing to this in that is you deserve to be there you are there is you dont you watch from the stands and that may be better than sticking some one on the podium just because they are white a women thats pregnents and gay and have green eyes
AND
Lots of women deserve to be heard
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:33amThat’s not quite right 13th. There’s expectations of “perfect” which are clearly unjustified, but then there is a point where principle has to matter for more than window dressing. I’m starting to get the very strong impression from a lot of nominal conservatives that any criticism of their positions will be met always and forevermore with “nobody’s perfect!”.
That’s a cop out.
Sure, if somebody gets on your arse about not caring about the U.N. Moon Treaty, then they are being a twit. But if the notice that, oh say, a particular conservative is all about gun control, that’s not expecting perfection, that’s stating “Look, you’re violating a core principle that YOUR SIDE claims to hold”. Perfection? Nah, how about instead “At least try to honor some of your principles and not sell out the moment polls tell you that you’re not quite as popular as you used to be for holding those principles”?
Report this comment
Gonzo
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:43amThey have had women in the past at CPAC, if one year they don’t, I don’t see it as that big of a deal.
Report this comment
13th Imam
Mar. 8, 2013 at 10:58amIt’s easy to be a DEMOCRAT.All you have to do is turn a blind eye or agree with any bad behavior.
It’s harder to be a R, because each different group that makes up the R side is fervent in their particular cause. We will be perpetual LOSERS if we can’t find a way to communicate and band together to beat these jokers. Without the insults.
It should be easy. We make it hard.
Report this comment
gyro
Mar. 8, 2013 at 11:26am13th — thats a great argument
Report this comment