
Richard Nixon (Credit: AFP/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON (AP) — Few presidents in modern times have been as interested in gun control as Richard Nixon, of all people. He proposed ridding the market of Saturday night specials, contemplated banning handguns altogether and refused to pander to gun owners by feigning interest in their weapons.
Several previously unreported Oval Office recordings and White House memos from the Nixon years show a conservative president who at times appeared willing to take on the National Rifle Association, a powerful gun lobby then as now, even as his aides worried about the political ramifications.
“I don’t know why any individual should have a right to have a revolver in his house,” Nixon said in a taped conversation with aides. “The kids usually kill themselves with it and so forth.” He asked why “can’t we go after handguns, period?”
Nixon went on: “I know the rifle association will be against it, the gun makers will be against it.” But “people should not have handguns.” He laced his comments with obscenities, as was typical.
Nixon made his remarks in the Oval Office on May 16, 1972, the day after a would-be assassin shot and paralyzed segregationist presidential candidate George Wallace. As president, Nixon never publicly called for a ban on all handguns. Instead, he urged Congress to pass more modest legislation banning Saturday night specials, which were cheaply made, easily concealed and often used by criminals.
Not all of the president’s men appeared to share his passion on the issue. The recordings and memos show that Nixon administration officials saw gun control as a political loser.
Nixon, a Republican, did say publicly that if Congress passed a ban on Saturday night specials, he would sign it. But in a sign of how potent the NRA was even 40 years ago, this narrow piece of legislation never made it to his desk, and there is no sign that he ever sent a draft bill to Capitol Hill.
Today, President Barack Obama faces similar hurdles in trying to ban assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition magazines. Gun control advocates say no one needs such powerful weapons to kill an intruder or take down an animal. In Nixon’s time, the argument of such advocates was that Saturday night specials were too poorly made to be relied on for self-defense or hunting.
“Let me ask you,” Nixon said to Attorney General John Mitchell in June 1971, “there is only one thing you are checking on, that’s the manufacture of those $20 guns? We should probably stop that.” Saturday night specials sold for $10 to $30 at the time. Mitchell responded that banning those guns would be “pretty difficult, actually,” because of the gun lobby.
“No hunters are going to use $20 guns,” Nixon countered.
“No, but the gun lobby’s against any incursion into the elimination of firearms,” said Mitchell.
The term Saturday night special originated in Detroit, where police observed the frequency with which the guns were used to commit weekend mayhem. Lynyrd Skynyrd memorialized the weapon in its 1975 song, “Saturday Night Special,” in which the Southern rock band sang: “Ain’t good for nothin’/But put a man six feet in a hole.”
Nixon’s private comments were not always supportive of gun control, particularly measures that would go beyond handguns. For example, in a taped conversation just a few days after saying that people shouldn’t have handguns, the president asked rhetorically, “What do they want to do, just disarm the populace? Disarm the good folks and leave the arms in the hands of criminals?”
But most of his comments on the tapes, available at the websites of the National Archives and of the University of Virginia’s Miller Center, were in favor of stronger gun control.
At a June 29, 1972, news conference, about six weeks after Wallace’s shooting, Nixon said he’d sign legislation banning Saturday night specials. Later that year, the Senate did pass such a bill, but the House never acted on the legislation.
The bill’s sponsor, Indiana Democrat Birch Bayh, said in a recent interview that the NRA helped prevent his bill from getting through Congress. The Nixon administration supported an unsuccessful Republican alternative Senate bill on Saturday night specials that had a definition the NRA preferred.
The shooting of another politician put gun control back on the radar the following year. On Jan. 30, 1973, two robbers shot Sen. John Stennis, D-Miss., and surgeons initially thought he would die. Stennis survived and lived until 1995.
The day of the shooting, Nixon told White House special counsel Charles Colson, “At least I hope that Saturday night special legislation, at least we’re supporting that, you know. We’re not for gun control generally, but we are for that. God damn it that ought to be passed. Or was it passed?”
When Colson told him it hadn’t, Nixon instructed his counsel, “We better damn well be for it now, huh?”
At a news conference the next day, the president repeated his call to ban Saturday night specials. He also volunteered a comment that few national politicians would make today: “Let me say, personally, I have never hunted in my life. I have no interest in guns and so forth.”
By March 1973, aide John Ehrlichman was telling Nixon that gun control was a “loser issue for us.”
“You’ve got a highly mobilized lobby,” he told the president. “I think what we have to do is carve out a little piece of it, and Saturday night specials, of course, has been our tactic.”
Other White House officials also argued against doing much, including Tom C. Korologos, a White House deputy assistant for legislative affairs and later an outside lobbyist for the NRA and ambassador to Belgium under President George W. Bush.

Indian Prime minister Indira Gandhi (L) stands next to American president Richard Nixon during an official ceremony during her visit to United States in November 1971. Credit: AFP/Getty Images
“The thing that worries me is that the president’s hard-core support comes from the gun-folk and obviously we need support these days,” Korologos wrote in an Aug. 31, 1973 memo, referring to the Watergate scandal that would undo Nixon’s presidency.
“Lurking in the background is the president’s personal statement: `I’m a liberal on gun control,’” Korologos said. Nixon might have made this statement privately; there is no record of him saying it publicly.
Korologos’ conclusion: “I vote for a `talk’ meeting and then `tough it out’ by doing nothing and hope nobody gets shot in the next three years.”
The effort to ban Saturday night specials receded in recent decades as the focus of gun control advocates shifted to rein in more powerful weapons.
Nixon’s focus soon shifted, too.
In June 1972, a little over a month after his chat about banning handguns, Nixon had a recorded conversation that showed him trying to get the FBI to stop investigating the break-in at Democratic offices at the Watergate office building by burglars tied to his re-election committee.
Few remember the tapes about handguns. History forever remembers the tape that gave Nixon’s Watergate pursuers their “smoking gun.”






















































































































Comments (98)
jungle J
Mar. 11, 2013 at 8:05pmNow I know enough to make a life long judgement on Nixon. He truly was bad!
Report this comment
Silvertruth
Mar. 11, 2013 at 8:13pmHe was a Fascist. He wanted total government control of everything. This is no secret to anyone that studied him. He was no different than our current President other than the ‘elite’ he represented did not pander to groups. He was a firm believer in the Military Industrial groups and high powered companies. Think “MAD Men” but with guns, vehicles and fortune 500 companies instead of Ad companies.
He did not have a good vision for this nation.
Report this comment
CowboyExpat
Mar. 11, 2013 at 8:21pmThe same guy who, in 1972, tried to corner all the toilet paper in the market to falsely increase economic outlooks in order to get re-elected…google it. I remember…couldn’t buy a roll of TP, for love nor money.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Mar. 11, 2013 at 8:42pmRhino.
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Mar. 11, 2013 at 9:14pmWow! Nixon for total handgun ban.. Reagan supported gun control and an assault weapons ban. W. Bush supported a ban on high capacity clips and instant background checks at gun shows and said in 2000 that Supported the assault weapons ban. Whens the last time republicans elected some one who was better than Obama on gun control? HAHA it’s hilarious actually! Obama is the “communist” who “hates the constitution” when his views are almost identical, if not less extreme, than every republican president Since Nixon!
Report this comment
StandingOnMyHead
Mar. 11, 2013 at 9:46pmWhy is it so difficult for the populace to understand, this nation has been ruled under one party with two faux sides for a century or more?!? Nixon was groomed by Prescott Bush. Once everyone is willing to accept this, maybe then we can stop the troll nonsense of people like keaton and get to the heart of the matter finding real solutions to our real problems.
Report this comment
THX-1138
Mar. 11, 2013 at 10:15pm@Keatonc333
This has been going on since the 1930′s. But then you probably still believe the fairytale that there are two different national political parties. (Clue: study up on the “Good Cop / Bad Cop” scam. Then for bonus points see if you can figure out what significant political movements had their origins in the late 1920′s and early 1930′s.)
ROFL *MAO*
Report this comment
Miami
Mar. 11, 2013 at 11:25pmHe also pushed for government takeover of the medical system and when that failed he started the HMO system which has ruined the Medical system.
What can be said? PROGRESSIVE
Report this comment
WakingSheep
Mar. 11, 2013 at 11:38pmDidn’t a recent republican Presidential candidate from MA sign a gun ban in that state?…
Who was that again?….
Report this comment
Obama_In_PeePee_By_Zee_Arteeest_Beck
Mar. 12, 2013 at 12:38am“Find Out Which Former Republican President Wanted a Total Handgun Ban”
(it’s Nixon … sorry to spoil the story)
THE PROBLEM with the destruction of America, Life, Liberty, and Property is that it has been planned and has been in operation FOR 100 YEARS by “communists” (at first so called), then “progressives” (when communism became a dirty word), then “liberals” (when progressive might give away the game). Today, they are back to “progressives” or just plain “socialists”, or RINOs, or Democrats. Now that they are chomping at the bit finish their plan (almost there!), they openly boast about it:
“DEMOCRATS OPENLY BOAST! Socialized Medicine IS KEY To The 100 YEARS Marxist U.S.-Overthrow Strategy!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Loi_Vqu7Z28
” ‘This is a wonderful, exciting day for us [the U.S. Senate] and the culmination of nearly 100 years of work.’
With those chilling words, by the appropriately named New York Democrat ‘Rules Committee Chairman’ Louise Slaughter, the Democrat majority of the U.S. House Of Representatives, in lock-step, pushed through an un-Constitutional, socialist takeover of America under the umbrella phrase of ‘health care’.”
“So this is how liberty dies, with thunderous applause.”
-Star Wars: Revenge Of The Sith [2005]
“DICTATORSHIP For America IMPLEMENTED!! :: Glenn Beck Named THE TRAITORS & Exposed THEIR CONSPIRACY!!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAu_-UmERuo
Report this comment
LakeHartwellSailor
Mar. 12, 2013 at 12:49amKEATONC333 (or is it 666?)
As OLDSURFRAT said,
“its not about party, its about the Constitution”
So get off it.
I am still waiting for your reply on several other stories regarding guns. You are usually very vocal in defending gun-control, I suspect you are feeling a little pressure, and it is obvious from your comments that you are struggling to defend those views.
It is a little uncomfortable when you are staring down the wrong side of the barrell, isn’t it, you little commie?
Report this comment
milez5
Mar. 12, 2013 at 3:31amI don’t know why we insist on calling this man a conservative. He once made the late newsman, Howard K smith bolt up right when he said that when it came to economics he was a Keynesian. He certainly proved it with his Economic Stabilization act of 1970 which covered rents, wages, you name it.
It was also Nixon who opened up China, whom we are now in debt to for more than one trillion dollars. Of course most of our factories as well. No, say what you will about Nixon, but he was no conservative.
Report this comment
old white guy
Mar. 12, 2013 at 5:24amole nixon did not exactly fit the conservative mold.
Report this comment
TrueSoundsOfLiberty
Mar. 12, 2013 at 5:32amKeaton, how dare you speak such truths here?!?!
The made-up god will destroy you!!
Report this comment
stumpygrim
Mar. 12, 2013 at 6:28am@keatonic aka encinom.
Using the word “clips” instead of magazine just nullifies any attempt by your dumbasss at credibility.F-n idiot.
Report this comment
poorrichard09
Mar. 12, 2013 at 7:52amAnother similarity to 0blama: gun banner, liar, enemies list, etc.
As Mark Levin calls him “Barack MILHOUSE 0blama” cuz we weren’t supposed to say “Hussein.”
Report this comment
maNDan1979
Mar. 12, 2013 at 9:02amtotal control through tough talk and choking regulations, socialism awaits, and it scares me enough to look at living elsewhere. This isnt the America I was raised in, this isnt the America I served for, btw would never do again. good luck people, save your money and pray
Report this comment
Clownzilla
Mar. 11, 2013 at 7:37pmPicture Caption:
“See these people in North Vietnam? They don’t allow their citizens to own guns and they treat their people with the utmost respect.”
Report this comment
darkknight91
Mar. 11, 2013 at 8:02pmAnd to think Elvis gave him a revolver. Enemies of our God given rights are on both sides of the aisle.
Report this comment
Exrepublisheep
Mar. 11, 2013 at 8:28pmDARKKNIGHT91. Correct. How do you get the masses to remain ignorant of this fact? To portray the other side as being evil. Make it up, rile the base, and smile when people are furious about the size of “Mooochelles’” ****.
Report this comment
termyt
Mar. 11, 2013 at 7:26pmWhy does the Blaze of all places equate “Republican” with “Conservative?”
Nixon was about as Conservative as Jimmy Carter was when he was President. He gives Teddy Roosevelt a run for “Most Progressive Republican.”
Very mainstream media of you. I suppose we all get our talking points from Bill Krystal and go to Pat Robertson for religious advice, too.
Report this comment
kaydeebeau
Mar. 11, 2013 at 7:51pmI so agree – There is a HUGE difference between a Republican and a Conservative – differences become more apparent every year as Republicans become more and more progressive and little different than the Demonrats
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Mar. 11, 2013 at 8:00pmbut the problem is that conservatives have historically voted strictly for republican party, so in essence they are married to each other
Report this comment
JediKnight
Mar. 11, 2013 at 8:15pm@SoyBomb: I believe as Glenn does that that ended with Rand Paul’s filibuster. Republicans that blindly vote for the Republican are going to become much fewer. I personally left the party after this last election. I fully support Republicans like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul but will continually condemn ones like McCain and Graham.
I am constantly reminding people that just because someone is a Republican, that does not make them a conservative. We have to stop listening to what they’re saying during election season and look at how they are in office. If they’ve been busy trampling your rights, they aren’t conservative and we shouldn’t be voting for them.
Report this comment
Mad Engineer
Mar. 11, 2013 at 9:40pmIn my lifetime, Republican has never equaled Conservative. I have never had the opportunity to vote for a conservative Republican for President (i.e. Dole, W, McStupid, Mittens). The only reason I maintain a Republican voter registration is because Oklahoma is a closed primary state.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Mar. 11, 2013 at 10:06pm@Jedi
well i guess if glenn said it – it must be true
Report this comment
Apple Bite
Mar. 12, 2013 at 12:30amNo SoyBomb, it’s true if there’s plenty of evidence to back it up. You been on this site long enough to know that if there’s one thing Beck has said time and again, it’s ” Don’t take my word for it, Do your homework.”
Too many Progressives depend on the dubious masses not to do their homework. Could you be one of them?
Report this comment
termyt
Mar. 12, 2013 at 8:44amSoy,
The Tea Party started because of dissatisfaction with both of the political parties. There is no Conservative Party. The Republican Party has traditionally followed Conservative principles but for the last several decades, those principles have only been part of the Republican Platform, not part of actual Republican governance.
Many Conservatives are Independent, but those who remain Republicans hope to elect Republicans who govern like they say they will instead of how they do.
Some of us do vote Democrat hoping they don’t do what the platform says they will (so called Blue Dogs in the last elections).
Some of us vote Libertarian, but that’s not a great fit, either, as Conservatives tend to believe the life of the unborn is inalienable (not a State Right) and we don’t want drugs legalized if we have to pay for the addicts medical needs after they wreck their bodies.
Report this comment
thibx
Mar. 11, 2013 at 7:10pmnixon was still better than oboma.
Report this comment
wilbstal
Mar. 11, 2013 at 8:09pmyes yes yes
Report this comment
LostInTheSpin
Mar. 11, 2013 at 8:29pmBeing beaten within an inch of your life is better than being beaten to death….does that make being beaten within an inch of your life an attractive option?
Report this comment
BlackCrow
Mar. 11, 2013 at 7:04pmSeeing as this was the original RINO who came up with the EPA and OSHA it doesn’t surprise me a bit. The NRA would have stood for the Second Amendment then just as it is now.
Report this comment
VaARNG_Guardsman
Mar. 11, 2013 at 7:12pmNixon that dog.
Report this comment
Witness1974
Mar. 11, 2013 at 7:33pmBlackcrow: My sentiments exactly. Leaving out Watergate, Nixon’s administration was a disaster. In the article he is quoted as saying, “I’m liberal on gun control.” He was liberal on a lot more than that. Perhaps that is why he was able to come back as the elder statesman; the liberals secretly loved him.
Report this comment
SpeakSoftlyAndCarry
Mar. 11, 2013 at 7:03pmMore half-arce “much to do about nothing” reporting by the apparent liberal mole Jason Howerton. Jason always leaves the real meat out of his finger sandwiches. Nixon’s interest in banning Saturday Night Specials was nothing more than left-over Jim Crow-ism. In the 1960s and early 70s racial tensions were still very high and most African Americans were still struggling financially. An inexpensive “saturday night special” was all that most African Americans could afford for self protection. And while it’s true that many of these inexpensive guns ended up in the hands of criminals, that really had little to do with the progressive Richard Nixon’s motives for wanting to make handguns unaffordable for African Americans, and the rest of the nation’s poor. And Jason tagging Nixon as a “Conservative” is a laugh. That would be like calling George McGovern a “Moderate”. So what were you thinking Jason?…that we are all to young to remember how things really were back then? And that we can so easily be manipulated by half-truths propagated into a lame attempt to re-write history by holding up the biggest POS progressive GOPer to ever hold a national office as a Conservative champion? Shhheeesshs…how the heck did you ever get a job working for Glenn Beck and why do you still have it?
Report this comment
justangry
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:59pmDon’t forget Reagan was publicly supportive of the Brady Bill after he left office.
Report this comment
jcldwl
Mar. 11, 2013 at 7:06pmThey have all been progressives for a very long time. This is not news. Nixon was the first president to visit communist China. Doesn’t that tell you something. They all want the same ends they just go about it differently.
Report this comment
SpeakSoftlyAndCarry
Mar. 11, 2013 at 7:14pmAnd by that time Reagan was suffering from dementia with Alsheimers’ as you liberals are fond of pointing out when discussing his earlier Presidency. Even’ Reagan’s own son has acknowledged that to be the case.
http://www.sj-r.com/breaking/x930798456/Alzheimers-explains-Reagan-support-for-gun-ban-son-says-in-Springfield
Report this comment
Beachmastermax
Mar. 11, 2013 at 7:23pmHis wife was supportive of it. RR was not considered self reliant for most his retirement because of Alzhiemers.
What did he support when he was president? That is the proof in the pudding.
Report this comment
justangry
Mar. 11, 2013 at 8:56pm@SpeakSoftlyAndCarry, Well, I’m not a liberal, and that doesn’t really get him off the hook considering the tough gun restrictions he signed while governor of California. My point is, while better than the dems for the most part, we can’t rely on republicans to protect our second amendment rights.
Report this comment
The_Fifth_Column
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:51pmReporting that Richard Nixon was a conservative president is a pretty big stretch. He was ‘NOT’. Just because you call yourself a Republican, doesn’t mean your a Conservative. Look at John McCain, Lindsey Graham, etc,etc. They are no more conservative than any other Liberal in the Congress. Long past time for them to go too.
Report this comment
CathyvanDyke
Mar. 11, 2013 at 7:25pmConservative?
Think about the implications of Nixon’s 1972 visit to Communist China. The message was that America would enter into diplomatic relations with regimes where dictators rule the people providing a democratic influence.
Forty-one years later democracy is still illusive for the Chinese people but diplomatic relations imply that China now owns much of American real estate and jobs.
The politicians do not get it. The communists and Islamics do not compromise ideology. However … the ideology flourishes and takes over under the rights that an appeasing democratic America affords..
Report this comment
SimpleTruths
Mar. 11, 2013 at 10:32pmYou can stand on the rooftops and shout out all you want that Republican’s are not Conservatives. The fact is you’re right but another fact is that what you define as Conservative represents a small minority of American voters. Most people don’t share your views and won’t vote for somebody that passes your litmus tests. Deal with it.
Report this comment
Nicholson William R
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:38pmAs anyone above the age of 5 years old will honestly tell you , ” If you use profanity on a regular basis , everyone then knows , You are, an Idiot ! ” Nixon shows that even 50 – 60 years ago brain-dead types could still fool the publicly indoctrinated masses ! Eisenhower knew , we we’re in trouble and as a wise General , he advised us with his warning given with his last public television address to the nation. He warned us and now we shall pay the price for not waging an adequate offensive posture with accompanying action. The night of the sword is long past due. watch the movie based on Ike’s last speech ” Why We Fight ” released several years ago.
Report this comment
teebubba
Mar. 11, 2013 at 7:06pmAs anyone over 30 might tell you there is difference between a person who uses profanity because he hasn’t a deep reserve of adjectives and adverbs at his disposal and one who uses profanity for a point of emphasis. Nixon was one of the brightest minds to ever occupy the White House and a good lifetime friend of JFK. He was stalked himself by the fellow who shot and paralyzed George Wallace with a handgun.
Report this comment
tonypro
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:38pmIs it just me, or does the Prime Minister of India look more like his sister.
Definitely related though, I mean just look at that nose profile on the two of them.
Report this comment
spirited
Mar. 11, 2013 at 7:08pmIt’s TONY’s eyes ;*)
His is more like Bob Hope’s slope and she has an outy.
Report this comment
700P
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:35pmAll the above. Nixon is typical the checker pants country club Repubs responsible for Dem victories in the last two presidential elections Liberty Loving Americans no longer trust these bozos…that love affaireended during GW’s neocon misadventures and expansion of government that the current administration simply opened the throttle on.
Report this comment
phrogdriver
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:35pmRIchard Nixon was many things.
“Conservative” as NOT one of them. Wage price controls? OSHA? EPA?
How could “The Blaze” possibly call this guy “conservative”?
Report this comment
spirited
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:34pmAs soon as the prince sets himself up above law,
he loses the king in the tyrant.
He does, to all intents and purposes,
unking himself
by acting out of and beyond that sphere which the constitution allows him to move in;
and in such cases
he has no more right to be obeyed
than any inferior officer who acts beyond his commission.
–Jonathan Mayhew
A Discourse Concerning Unlimited Submission and Non-Resistance to the Higher Powers (1750)
Report this comment
PA_Iraq_Vet
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:33pmHe knew better than to try it.
Report this comment
Briancito
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:29pmThe liberals who hate the Bill of Rights really are desperate when they want to say that Tricky Dick was on their side. Personally my favorite moment in the political history of my lifetime was Nixon walking stiff legged and nervous down the carpet to that helicopter that flew him away in disgrace out of our lives. He did not like freedom, including freedom from being burglarized by government goons. Ha ha ha!
Report this comment
dissentnow
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:29pmNixon was just another establishment progressive who supported gun bans and universial healthcare…….hmmmm sound familiar?
Report this comment
Budrow
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:21pmNixon was an idiot in his own right. He is also the guy that made Elvis Presley an FBI agent. Contrary to Nixon’s own beliefs – he was a crook afterall. ” “
Report this comment
Patriot72
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:21pmHe was a big government, progressive. That he would curtail 2nd Amendment freedoms is no real shock.
Report this comment
CatB
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:31pmLittle wonder Bob Woodward said that he had seen this before.
Report this comment
Diane TX
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:21pmI knew it was Nixon even before I clicked on this. Nixon and Obama are the two sides of the same coin.
It was Nixon who started the EPA. Both men were/are control freaks. Both men were/are secretive and underhanded. Both men were/are psychopaths.
Report this comment
The-Monk
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:20pmNo liberal is liberal.
Nixon; “I’m a liberal on gun control”
Definition of liberal (adj)
bing.com · Bing Dictionary
lib·er·al
[ líbbərəl ]
1-broad-minded: tolerant of different views and standards of behavior in others
2-progressive politically or socially: favoring gradual reform, especially political reforms that extend democracy, distribute wealth more evenly, and protect the personal freedom of the individual
3-generous: freely giving money, time, or some other asset
Synonyms: open-minded, broad-minded, moderate, noninterventionist, freethinking, tolerant, laissez-faire
Report this comment
Carrie3570
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:38pm“Lurking in the background is the president’s personal statement: `I’m a liberal on gun control,’” Korologos said. Nixon might have made this statement privately; there is no record of him saying it publicly.
~ Glad you are able to trust someone’s word that President Nixon said such a thing. I don’t. Seems to me President Nixon had a problem with a particular gun, the Saturday Night Special, because it was often used by criminals.
I don’t agree with any weapon being banned, I think we should be able to own tanks, machine guns, and anything else our military uses. If you have the money to buy it, you should be able to own it. I wanted to make it clear I do not agree with Nixon on any gun control, but I’m not into trusting he said – she said garbage.
Report this comment
frogg
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:19pmJust because you are a Republican doesn’t mean that you aren’t stupid.
Report this comment
CatB
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:27pmHe was my guess before I clicked on the article … enemies lists .. criminal behavior … unaccountability .. Bob Woodward …. deja vu
Report this comment
Welcome Black Carter
Mar. 11, 2013 at 10:44pmStanding on the same side of the line with todays democrats…
That gives meaning to the word “stupid”
Report this comment
OldSurfRat
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:17pmNot an issue of party but a Constitutional issue.
I don’t care what damn party your with power corrupts and we the people are all that stands between corrupt power and our freedoms.
Report this comment
LakeHartwellSailor
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:24pmDing Ding Ding Ding
We have a WINNER!!!!!!
You sir, are absolutely CORRECT!
Report this comment
Triple7
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:17pmJust more affirmation as to what a heaping pile of fecal matter Nixon was.
Report this comment
Inkmage
Mar. 11, 2013 at 8:11pmJust more affirmation that there are progressives, within the Republican party as well… They just go about it in a different way. Nixon is the one who created the whole social conservative movement, as well as moving the party in bed with the Christian Coalition, all out of fear and wanting to control the things that were happening socially in America. He’s the one who also created the EPA, allowing gov to get bigger and all, and now look at what they are doing.
Both the left and the right, are nothing more than collectivist really.
Report this comment
Zcat
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:10pmGo figure!
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Mar. 11, 2013 at 6:08pmNixon was a gun grabber and had to resign because Liddy and company broke into a shrinks office,that’s what brought him down. In comparison to Nixon BHO’s done more than enough to ensure a lengthy prison term for himself.
Report this comment