Judge Overturns NYC’s Soda Ban
A state judge has overturned New York City’s proposed ban all sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces, ruling the new regulations illegal.
New York City is “enjoined and permanently restrained from implementing or enforcing the new regulations,” New York Supreme Court Judge Milton Tingling decided Monday, adding that Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s attempts at “portion control” were both “arbitrary” and “capricious.”
“The simple reading of the rule leads to the earlier acknowledged uneven enforcement even within a particular city block, much less the city as a whole … the loopholes in this rule effectively defeat the state purpose of the rule,” the decision reads.
Judge Tingling in his ruling explains that the Board of Health’s duty is to protect city residents by “providing regulations that prevent and protect against diseases,” as the Wall Street Journal notes.
It does not, he argues, have the authority to “limit or ban a legal item under the guise of ‘controlling chronic disease.’”
“The board may supervise and regulate the city’s food supply when it affects public health, but the City Charter clearly outlines when such steps may be taken,” the WSJ adds.
In order for city officials to impose something along the lines of Mayor Bloomberg’s sugary drinks ban, the city must face “imminent danger due to disease,” according to Tingling’s decision.
“That has not been demonstrated,” he notes.
The judge also said Mayor Bloomberg stepped outside the boundaries of his authority when he presented the Board of Health — “which is solely appointed by him” – with the ban.
The City Council, the decision explains, is the legislative body “and it alone has the authority to legislate as the board seeks to do here.”
Unsurprisingly, Mayor Bloomberg has vowed to fight Monday’s ruling:
We plan to appeal the sugary drinks decision as soon as possible, and we are confident the measure will ultimately be upheld.
— NYC Mayor’s Office (@NYCMayorsOffice) March 11, 2013
Here’s Judge Tingling’s decision:
Scheduled to take effect March 12, the new law would have affected theaters, cart vendors, coffee shops, restaurants, and sports venues, TheBlaze noted earlier today.
The regulations would not have affected grocery or convenience stores that don’t serve prepared food, CBS New York points out. The ban also wouldn’t have applied to non-sugary drinks, diet soda, “or anything that has at least 50 percent milk or milk substitute.”
UPDATE: Mayor Bloomberg called together an emergency presser to address Monday’s ruling. He said he is confident that they will be able to reverse the court’s decision and that he believes the judge got it “completely wrong.”
“We believe the judge is totally in error in how he interpreted the law, and we are confident we will win on appeal,” Bloomberg said. He added: “One of the cases we will make is that people are dying every day. This is not a joke. Five thousand people die of obesity every day in America.”
Meanwhile, here’s TheBlaze’s Doc Thompson celebrating Judge Tingling’s ruling:
–
Follow Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) on Twitter
Featured image Getty Images. This post has been updated.
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.















































































































Comments (200)
maggiepie
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:34pmPoor Nanny Bloomberg. That judge should rule all his ideas unconstitutional. People have the right
to make their own decisions.
Report this comment
whatthecrazy
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:20pmI like Crissy Mathews have found my Tingling,it’s just not going up my leg and it can rule over idiots like Bloomberg. SAAAweet
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 5:13pmbut…but you don’t understand…Bloomberg’s taking stuff away from you for your own good. He knows better than you…it’s for the people man….
Report this comment
OldSkoolDJ
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 5:37pmHey doomberg – the court says you’re an idiot!!!! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha!!!!!
Report this comment
michaelmoron
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 8:14pmBloomberg = Loser
Laughing in your face !!!!
Report this comment
YOURSENSEI
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 8:51pmThis is what you must know:
Big gulps. Quite a win. Of course, Colorado passed several gun control laws today, so we got that going for us. But hey, nice Tub o Coke in the W column for y’all. LOL
It is so.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 8:52pmMilton Tingling must not be a cultural changer.
Report this comment
RANGER1965
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 9:25pmIt’s interesting to watch a system that the liberal progressive depends on bite them in the **** from time to time. The regulations utterly reek of unconstitutional malarkey.
The court’s can’t rule on a law that’s not passed, but you can bet the moronic show and tell Colorado Legislature will also be overturned. It was all show and tell anyway. The Progressive Socialists can stick a feather in their liberal hat and say “look what we tried to do! It’s not our fault that the courts overturned it.”
Much ado about nothing really. Bloomberg is truly stupid, so perhaps he didn’t know, but the Colorado legislature knows all of this hot air will be overturned.
It’s like all this Gun Control nonsense in the Senate, it won’t get out of the Senate because too many Dems are from Gun friendly states, much less the house where it would die a truly ugly death.
Just alot of nonsense, and posturing.
Report this comment
susanm621
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 9:38pmits getting pretty bad when you need a judge to answer on what size drink you have to drink.
Report this comment
michaelmoron
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 9:56pm@YOURSENSELESS
This is what you must know:
Any Public Trustee that violates their oath to uphold the Constitution is guilty of Breach of Trust,
Perjury and Treason. The Lawsuits will begin and the charges will be filed.
Heads will roll. Your friends will regret their actions.
It is so.
Report this comment
RabidPatriot
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 10:46pmProgressives are or are attempting to steal away your freedoms and liberties everyday. Serious rights. The new America only cares if it is their right to soda. How sad.
Report this comment
TH777
Posted on March 12, 2013 at 12:24amDon’t we have bigger problems in this Country other than what size drink we have??? I don’t need another Mommy and Daddy! Since when does the government have a right to choose what size drink I have?? Kiss my keesta!! Good for you judge!! I only hope you stick with your decision!
Report this comment
YOURSENSEI
Posted on March 12, 2013 at 12:55amMr or Ms MICHAELMORON,
This is what you must know:
Check your adhesion.
It is so.
Report this comment
naughtycal
Posted on March 12, 2013 at 7:19amExactly, This is beyond a step to far. Whats next stop people from selling any foods that the state deams unhealthy, Ribs,French fries,fried chicken,process meats,any steak bigger than 4 ounces.
This law is a clear violation of our Constitution buts its a big effing poster child for how fascist the the left truely is. And which party really wants to steal all rights and create absolute powerful central government. Bloomberg is a prime example of what the democrats represent.
Report this comment
michaelmoron
Posted on March 13, 2013 at 9:09pm@youresenseless
This is what you must know.
Anything you consider adhesion, is in fact, unconscionable.
12 people will say it is so.
Report this comment
aproudinfidel
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:33pmMaybe that judge will overturn Bloomberg. What a moron he is.
Report this comment
RANGER1965
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 9:27pmHe truly is. Unlike the Colorado Legislature which knows all of their posturing will be overturned shortly after it’s ratified, in fact they are depending on it.
But Bloomberg is truly in a category all by himself. Arrogance blinds him.
Report this comment
MisterSarcastic
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:33pmIt’s great that the law was over turned. It’s sad that we’ve devolved to a point that a judge has to decide how much we can drink.
Report this comment
Silvertruth
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 8:03pmActually, the judge is saying that the mayor doesn’t have the right to tell you how much you can drink. He’s not limiting or affecting what you can or cannot drink. The judge also said that the law would be in the hands of the city council, not the mayor’s pet health department. (lower case is intentional)
Report this comment
SamIamTwo
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:32pmBuwahhahahahahaha…poor Dumbberg.
I can’t wait to hear what he has to say…arrogant little man…rich one at that.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 5:14pmYou won’t believe what he said….
“we’re not banning anything..it’s called portion control”. If a statement like that doesn’t scare the hell out of you when it’s uttered by a politician…then you’re beyond help.
Report this comment
Neno
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 6:26pmI think the USSR did the same thing with portion control. So get ready to wait 3hrs in line for bread
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:32pmA New York judge with some since????? That doesn’t happen often.
Report this comment
KevINtampa
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:40pmSense when?
Report this comment
PATTY HENRY
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:07pm:))) (Kevin)
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:21pmsense>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>not since…
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:23pmKEVIN….it was a typo. Now…you can bet I will be watching your posts very closely….you POS.
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:24pmAwe! Patty thinks Kevin is sooo funny.
Report this comment
Joesdomicial
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:45pmI think Kevin got THEGREATCARNAC a little **** hurt! I have to admit, that was pretty funny! Oh, by the way THEGREATCARNAC, your mistake was in fact a misuse of a word, not a typo….Just wanted to clarify since you seem to be getting so upset with Kevin for pointing it out!
Report this comment
wilbstal
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:51pmget lost Bloomberg is a jerk
Report this comment
shorelineliz
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:57pmcool.
Report this comment
AlansTigg
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 5:31pmwow… a little sensitive? It was funny. You might want to stop taking everything so seriously, it won’t help you survive the trials ahead. Don’t cha know laughter is good for the soul? Also happens to be good for the body.
Report this comment
snooop1e
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 5:38pm@KEVIN and THE GREATCANAC – Thanks for a great laugh, I needed that, you guys have a great since of humor ; )
Report this comment
gauge
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 5:39pmHaHa If it was a typo, then it might have been spelled swnse,sdnce, or maybe srnce
But you had to go clear across that keyboard to press the “i” key. LOL
Report this comment
whatahka
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 6:08pmCan I chime in with my two since, sense nobody here is making cents?
Report this comment
whatthecrazy
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 6:12pmThis is freakin funny… lol…. for a minute i thought i was on the playground.:):):)
Report this comment
spirited
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 8:01pmDoes it make sence?
Report this comment
The Giver
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 9:02pmSince, scents, sense or cents… Everyone here knows what you meant. I agree with you 100%. I was shocked that Bloomberg would have been reduced to begging for ration control by any NY judge. Some sanity with Rand Paul last week and now more sanity… One day at a time. Rations of sanity is all I ask for now.
Report this comment
Chaoleo
Posted on March 12, 2013 at 10:52pmDown south we call it “seance.”
Report this comment
RougeFastFingers
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:32pmMore bad news for Nanny Benito.
Rhat’s a shame.
Report this comment
dosdelgados
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:32pmI feel so bad for all the business owners who’ve spent the last few months sacrificing precious capital and time to abide by the stupid regulation, just so they could stay in business.
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:03pmI agree .. they threw out cups and product already .. they should sue the city in small claims court for the losses.. Or .. Nanny Bloomberg PERSONALLY ;-)
Report this comment
OlefromMN
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 6:49pmIf I owned a business in NYC I would not have opened up any new boxes of cups/glassware until the regulation was fully implemented (actually I would have found a loophole and ignored the regulation) . Hopefully the businesses will be able to return the unused “compliant” drinkware and recoup some of their expenses.
Report this comment
team1blazer
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 10:24pmI don’t feel sorry for them at all. They are idiots for putting up with the unconstitutional rules in the first place. If you are not willing to fight for liberty, you don’t deserve it.
Report this comment
wilbstal
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:30pmPlease Mr Judge keep your eyes toward the sky for one of Obams Drones and IRS audit from Bloomberg. NYC needs to get armed and shoot their way to freedoms this is what it will take I see it now. Hang the guilty Tranical offenders as it says in the Constitution ahnd Bill of rights.. get it done
Report this comment
Budrow
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:29pmThat “ban” is only one of the more asinine things to come down the pike in recent years. The ban on guns is equally as rediculous.
Report this comment
Al J Zira
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:13pmI agree. I’m really hoping this judge gets to hear arguments against Cuomo’s ridiculous gun controls.
Report this comment
Dethklok91
Posted on March 13, 2013 at 1:14amI know. It’s funny how they were willing to repeal the soda ban, but still refuse to repeal the gun ban.
Report this comment
Seagal45
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:29pmOh my did an outbreak of common sense just occur??
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:39pmYeah, but it’s probably temporary…
Report this comment
TGS
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:29pmI’m going to 7/11 shortly to buy the biggest ridiculous Gulp they have.
Report this comment
OldSurfRat
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:27pmMan it must feel like the end of prohibition for yousss guys in NY.
I think I’m going to go have coke no pepsi no coke. Hell I think I’ll have both.
Report this comment
Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:39pmCheeburga, cheeburga….pepsi pepsi…..chip, chip………..No Coke, pepsi.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guQzlA86BJA&playnext=1&list=PL562F0E28F95FD42E&feature=results_video
Report this comment
OldSurfRat
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:51pmDarmock
Belushi was so damn talented. This is my favorite. It shows how good he was.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHaA4RePosY
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:27pmUh, oh… time for Bloomberg’s Plan B….. a ban on straws.
Report this comment
OldSurfRat
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:37pmMaybe
Or maybe he will ban Judges.
A Little man with a big problem.
Report this comment
Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:55pmA ban on straws will not keep New Yorkers from sucking.
Report this comment
OldSurfRat
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:00pmDarmock
Oh snap!!
Report this comment
ltb
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:02pmGood observation, but it will probably be a $5.00 tax on 32 oz cups.
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:11pmDARMOK…..
lol.
Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:15pmHi Guys,
I hope that Judge has a good security team…
Report this comment
OldSurfRat
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:25pmMonk
3 big gulps and a slurpee
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 5:17pmbut…but..no one’s banning anything…it’s called portion control. Yeah…Bloomberg said that. If you’re not scared as all hell hearing a statement like that from a politician I feel very sorry for you.
Report this comment
Looking_Up
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 6:57pmHe will ban cups.
Report this comment
resme
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:27pmWOW. The courts invalidated another law… My heart can bear no more.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:31pmis this ruling based on local, state, or constitutional grounds?
Report this comment
termyt
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:26pmSo we do have an inherent right to large, sugary drinks.
Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Speech, Self Defense, and Due Process, not so much.
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:32pmNice!
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:26pmBut will Bloomberg ignore it like he does the Constitution and still send out the brown shirts to enforce it?? Come Tuesday city inspectors will be armed with 17-ounce cups to police New York City Mayor Bloomberg’s controversial new law banning large sodas and other sugary drinks.
The Health Department will begin implementing routine inspections to make sure eateries, including sit down restaurants and fast food chains, are not selling sugary beverages in servings larger than 16 ounces.
Those inspectors will have specially ordered measuring cups to help them enforce the new rule, Deputy Health Commissioner Daniel Kass said in an affidavit recently filed as part of the legal challenge to Bloomberg’s anti-big-soda policy.
‘The measuring cups that we will be issuing … will be able to contain 17 fluid ounces,’ Kass said. Inspectors will issue violations when a cup is found to ‘clearly exceed’ 16 ounces ‘when measured in the inspector’s measuring cup,’ he added.
Bloomberg proposed his oversized surgery beverage ban last May,as squelch unhealthy eating habits in New York.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:33pmyoutube >> Kim Mitchell Go For A Soda. Has a new meaning now huh??
Report this comment
MotoMofo
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:25pmTake that Momberg!
Report this comment
GardenoftheGods
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:25pmI’m glad the judge stepped in and used some common sense along with the Constitution! Nanny Bloomberg thinks he has the right to dictate what you can & cannot do with your body. Freedom lovers have to stand up to these Progressive power grabbers & tell them NO! Kudos to this judge!
Report this comment
paulwbrown
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:22pmCommon sense prevails in the judiciary if not in the Bloomberg administration.
Report this comment
3monkeysmomma
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:34pma glimmer of hope for the rest of the country.
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:22pmGood smack down the candy@ss statist.
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:00pmIndeed, and now the wrath of the Democrats will come down in full measure. Still the judge made the right choice.
Report this comment
brigott
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:22pmMeanwhile, the ban on Constitutional governance in America remains in full effect. This point of minutae is simply a distraction to make people believe that freedom does still exist, contrary to reality.
Report this comment
nesmond
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:20pmI guess that judge can kiss his/her career goodbye. Nice try though.
Report this comment
Sharon Rose
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:19pmOh my, Here is a judge with some sense.
Report this comment
happ77
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 4:05pmMaybe he should replace John Roberts.
Report this comment
Sargeking
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:19pmBWAHAHAHAHAHA….Mayor Doomberg!
Report this comment
NanAnn
Posted on March 11, 2013 at 3:19pmAbout time! Hope we are keeping the judge in office awhile.
Report this comment