CNN anchor Erin Burnett during an interview with former first lady Laura Bush that aired Monday posed a bit of a head-scratcher: Should we “accept” anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism “when we want to make change” in the Middle East?
See for yourself [courtesy NewsBusters]:
“An Egyptian woman, her name’s Samir Ibrahim, and she’s done a lot of things, courageous things. She’s also been criticized for sending tweets that are anti-Semitic, anti-American,” Burnnett said during a segment on the George W. Bush Institute’s Women’s Initiative Fellowship Program.
“Does the U.S. need to accept that when we want to make change? You have to support people that do those things — financially in term of awards, in terms of all these things — because it pays off in the end? Is that a trade-off we have to make?” she asked.
Mrs. Bush responded with a laughing, “No.”
“No, I don’t think so, not necessarily. But I do think it’s really important that we do support women in any way we can in the U.S. And I know American women want to do that,” she answered.
“It’s easy for us to recruit the mentors, the American women mentors for our class of Egyptian fellows because American women are interested in women around the world. And they want to see women succeed,” she answered.
You may recall that the the U.S. State Department recently rescinded its “Women of Courage Award” to Ibrahim because she has in the past tweeted some pretty unbelievably offensive comments.
TheBlaze’s Tiffany Gabbay provides the details:
Ibrahim’s past tweets included celebratory comments relating to the death of five Israeli tourists in a 2012 suicide bombing in Bulgaria.
“An explosion on a bus carrying Israelis in Burgas airport in Bulgaria on the Black Sea,” she tweeted directly following the attack. “Today is a very sweet day with a lot of very sweet news.”
Ibrahim’s vitriol is not reserved strictly for Jews, however. The Egyptian activist even holds the very country that was slated to honor her with an award in equal contempt. Following the riots that set siege to the United States embassy in Cairo on the eleventh anniversary of 9/11, Ibrahim said that every year should mark America’s destruction.
“Today is the anniversary of 9/11. May every year come with America burning.”
Doubling down on her racist diatribes, in August 2012, Ibrahim referred to Saudi Arabia’s ruling Al Saud family as “dirtier than the Jews” and not long after, admiringly quoted Hitler.
“I have discovered with the passage of days, that no act contrary to morality, no crime against society, takes place, except with the Jews having a hand in it. Hitler,” Ibrahim tweeted.
Yikes.
So, just to recap, Burnett wants to know whether we should accept this type of anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism in order to effect change in the Middle East.
Follow Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) on Twitter
Featured image Getty Images. This post has been updated.





















































































































Comments (261)
woodyee
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:26amWell, It’s good to see the former First Lady come up for some fresh air for a change. It might be good to see her husband come out for a little sunshine, too, unless he’s decided to get his shine from a bottle…
Report this comment
AmericanStrega
Mar. 12, 2013 at 12:28pmGeez WOODEYE, that was uncalled for.
Report this comment
xfiler93
Mar. 12, 2013 at 4:58pmShe is a FIRST LADY, not like the one we have now. They are not in the limelight like Slick WIllie, who craves it. Her and the former President have handled the time ouf of office with grace, much better then the other libturds.
Report this comment
tzion
Mar. 12, 2013 at 5:03pm@Jerk
The original Christians:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Christian
Report this comment
oldsoldier10
Mar. 12, 2013 at 5:49pmyou are a P0S Troll
Report this comment
ONLYHASHEM
Mar. 12, 2013 at 6:44pmDear Jerk,
Jesus was a Jew! He learned Talmud daily! His LAST SUPPER WAS THE PESACH SEDER! That Jews still celebrate yearly in the month of the Jewish Calendar called Nissan. What don’t you understand? The only correlation we have to Islam is that Hagar was Abraham’s concubine and she bore him a son named Yishmael. Yishmael was sent away because Sara didn’t think he was being a good influence on Isaac.Don’t ever compare the two religions! Ever! Judaism gave us the 10 COMMANDMENTS! What did Islam give us? In addition, Christianity is 100% an offspring of Christianity! It was established many years after the death of Christ based on the writings of Prophets. I am often shocked when Christians want to know why we don’t believe in Jesus as the messiah? We are like Jesus the Jew and we learn and practice everything he did. He believed in G-d and he also waited for the coming of the messiah just like we do.
Report this comment
Anamah
Mar. 12, 2013 at 7:39pmCNN must be a source of an infectious, a very contagious disease. This poor woman (the anchor) seems to suffer the same idiotic syndrome all the rest on the corrupted media. But is nice to met a classy lady as Laura Bush talking in front of the cameras…she is really a great First Lady.
Report this comment
FOREIGNANDDOMESTIC
Mar. 12, 2013 at 7:54pmONLYHASHEM
Jesus never said He was Messiah — at least not in the sense the Jews of his time understood the term. He said He was the Son of God. God had a much better plan than sending a human deliverer: “As high as the sky is above the earth are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.” (Isaiah 55:9).
You may not believe the words of Jesus quoted in the New Covenant, but you must admit He was crucified for a reason. He came to fulfill the law and He did. The pharisees and scribes hated to see their corrupt power being taken away from them by the truly Anointed One (uppercase).
There are many problems with denying that Jesus is the Sent One. For starters, animal sacrifice ended. How do you atone for your sins, friend? It’s not like you can just bypass the Abrahamic Covenant and expect God to join “modern civilization.” God is eternal, and you can’t contest His Truth.
Report this comment
db321
Mar. 12, 2013 at 8:12pmWood is also confuses with Ms. Bush answer that Women in America want to see Women in other Country succeed – Woody’s Media teach him that Conservative Republicans have declared War on Women. Woody believed that too.
The Reason why women don’t succeed in other countries is because they too voted for a Marxist Communist like Obama and were also lied too.
Report this comment
SendTheMeteors
Mar. 12, 2013 at 9:26pmShe simply looks disgusting. What did she use on her hair, superglue? It doesn’t move for goodness sake! And those wrinkles? Huge, canyon like wrinkles, has she never heard of makeup? That fake smile? When I see it it makes me want to vomit. Yeah right, like she cares if kids read or whatever stupid, disgusting cause she was in favor of. Is she anorexic or does she have cancer or something? She looks pathetic. And she was a teacher, and indoctrinator. She’s sick.
Ha. Just kidding. I always liked Laura Bush. And the causes she supported, including marriage equality like Dick Cheney is. I just thought I’d have a little fun imagining what it would be like for you guys to insult Michelle Obama. Seems silly to me, I didn’t get anything out of it, but I’m not a hate kind of person. But hey, to each his own!
Every noticed how fat Michelle is? Gross.
bclinger
Mar. 12, 2013 at 9:33pmWoodyee, Your mom just called its time to put you pants back on and come up for supper.
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Mar. 12, 2013 at 9:38pmOnlyHashem,
If you are so Christ-like then why do most American Jews side with, vote for, and support monetarily the evil, vile, disgusting, intolerant, criminal , communist Democrats? Answer that for me please. Other than that, if is at least refreshing to read a post by someone that knows what they are talking about. So, why do you guys support the progs? Could it be that you despise Christians? I want to know.
Report this comment
dmerwin
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:09pmSooo, her answer would be to appease a group of the most intolerant people in the world in the name of what and to what end? Would she want to raise a daughter in Saudi Arabia? Egypt? Afghanistan? We are THE MOST tolerant society in the world and we expect that our views be respected. You do not fund (foreign aid) the demise of your own society in exchange for a society that mutilates their women, does not allow them to vote, does not allow them to drive and thinks that beating women is an acceptable social practice. Do these people read??? CNN, I mean as I know that education is NOT a priority for women in many muslim dominated countries.
Report this comment
ThePirateRagnar
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:18pm@Woodie
Yeah, read his book. He hasn’t drank in 40 years there Genius. Not to mention, he could probably our run, out bike, out push-up, out read, out paint and out shoot your idiot ass.
-The Pirate Ragnar
Report this comment
USALOVER2011
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:01pmYes, the one in the white house right now has too much SUN her brain is fried!!!!!
Report this comment
Blaze_Comment
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:38pmYou wrote this after you finished a bottle?
Report this comment
LogCabinRepublican
Mar. 13, 2013 at 4:57amWTH does this CNN reporter think? My gawd, do they truly think that an anti American should receive a medal from us? And for the White House to even consider it. That Guy really is Anti-American – what a puke.
Report this comment
myway
Mar. 13, 2013 at 7:38amYou can go back to bed now.
Report this comment
Info warrior
Mar. 13, 2013 at 9:27amIslamophobia is the new antisemitism.
You’d be hard pressed to find an islamophobe who’s not supportive of Obama’s war on terror.
After all, the people he is killing are all Muslims.
Report this comment
wheresmysandybeach
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:26amI saw this interview and almost fell off the chair when she asked Mrs. Bush that question. I LOVED the way she said ‘No!”, just the way I would have, the way anyone with a lick of sense would have! The libs are mad we didn’t give her the award, they were confident the lo-fo’s would never notice and hoping we wouldn’t pick up on what an atrociously evil person this Ibriham woman is!
Report this comment
Secret Squirrel
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:35amThese a$$clowns think change is good for any reason.
Suicide is change, so suicide is good, I guess.
“So to effect change, we have to accept communism.”
It’s time to openly mock these clowns.
Report this comment
kenboo1
Mar. 12, 2013 at 12:08pmSocialistSlayer I wouldn’t wish that on anyone… the middle east is know for their human rights and especially how they treat women… Erin is not stupid (i hope), she was just following her producers’ agenda… Don’t forget, this is the Communist News Network… You really have to now go to current TV to get the absolute truth on the middle east…
Report this comment
Miami
Mar. 12, 2013 at 12:10pmShe spent to much time on NBC & MSNbc, she caught the Marxist bug on Morning Joe
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Mar. 12, 2013 at 12:14pmThe problem is with the overuse of the words, “antisemitism and anti-Americanism.” We have a hardy tendency to call any who disagree with our world view, anti-American, and any who criticize Jews, Israel, and Zionists, antisemitic.
Report this comment
RANGER1965
Mar. 12, 2013 at 12:16pmI am in a continual state of befuddlement on how Islam, “The Religion of Peace” could become the poster child for liberal affections. It make zero sense to me.
I completely understand their hatred of Christianity. Christianity is completely opposed to many of their positions on morality. Homosexuality being just one. The Christian faith teaches that they will be judged by a righteous God one day as well.
But…for them to embrace a religion whose moral precept’s are even more strict, and gives not only the authority but also the duty to hunt down any who are opposed to their belief and hurt them, tax them, and even kill them is beyond all comprehension to me.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Mar. 12, 2013 at 12:33pmRANGER1965, what’s worse? Overt fundamentalists hiding behind Islam, or covert fundamentalists hiding behind the Talmud. Both are cultural changing, tradition destroying, I want to rule your life, movements. The latter has been far more successful at completing its task in America. To me, it poses the greatest threat because it operates in full view of a deliberately ignorant public.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Mar. 12, 2013 at 12:36pmRANGER…let me put it in these terms.
For liberals..if it’s against Christians or an alternative to Christianity (and by proxy: conservatism) then they are subliminally open to being sympathetic to it. They’re not as guarded about it.
Look at the CNN reporter that was sexually assaulted in Tahrir Square as a great example…this product of the liberal education system (read: deluded and uninformed) actually believed she was seeing another Ghandi-esque revolution taking place and therefore it was romanticized and made something it was not. Now had it been a christian tinged uprising she’d have been automatically suspicious and guarded, but because it was muslims, in the middle east and they’re portrayed as “targets of US oppression” (as her professors taught her) she completely ignored the reaility of Islam in the Arab world. For these muslim males, western women are seen as cheap, easy and beneath contempt..fit solely for sexual gratification, and nothing more. She had no idea in her romanticized liberal haze that in a heated mob of arab/muslim males, she had a target on her panties as it were. Today she’s a lot more aware and no thanks to the liberal professors who taught her that anyone against the U.S. should be viewed sympathetically.
I hope this helps to illustrate why liberals are sympathetic to Islam regardless of the facts.
Report this comment
pooka_yc
Mar. 12, 2013 at 1:15pm@Ranger
The reason the left aligns itself with radical Islam? “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”. They each want to destroy Christianity and Judaism and are using each other to achieve that goal. They both hate America because America was founded on Judeo Christian principles. If they were ever to achieve their goal, they would turn on each other.
Report this comment
Dan_o
Mar. 12, 2013 at 1:19pmIsn’t this vitriol a little disingenuous? We, as a country, have supported the supposed lesser of two evils for decades in the middle-east. I recognize that is not the same as championing one woman or man and making them a hero, but I don’t think you can leave our support of Iraq, Iran, Egypt, the Saudis, Afghanistan, Kuwait, etc.
Having said that, the reporters question is ridiculous.
Report this comment
ShamanWorld
Mar. 12, 2013 at 1:33pm@pooky. “America was founded on Judeo-Christian principles”….How can Judaism and Christianity go together, when the Jooz don’t accept Jesus Christ as the son of God? That would be a contradiction….Actually, Islam and Judaism are more closely related. Abrahams 2 sons: Isaac is equivelant to Judaism and the son from Haggar, named Ishmail is the basis for Islam. Neither sides accept Jesus as the saviour, and both religions(Judaism/Islam) are still waiting for the Lords return under similar(to each other’s)scriptural prophecies.
Report this comment
bartjoebob
Mar. 12, 2013 at 2:01pmAnd CNN’s ratings are where? Dead last and falling?
Report this comment
The_Cabrito_Goat
Mar. 12, 2013 at 2:16pmMy reaction: WHAT?!
Report this comment
tzion
Mar. 12, 2013 at 2:37pm@Jerk
Perhaps you should actually research the origin of the term antisemitism. The term itself only came into existence in the 19th century and, much like the more recent anti-Zionism, was originally used by those attacking Jews as a way of describing themselves. Then, much like how communists and socialists became progressives and liberals, antisemites were forced to become anti-Zionists or other such labels to avoid the stigma associated with their original title. Moreover, the person who first used the term “semitism”, Wilhelm Marr, defined it as the threat of Jews making inroads into non-Jewish society and subverting it .
I also find it interesting that you chose to attack the Talmud. I sincerely doubt that even one of the “Jewish progressives” you are so fond of pointing out is even capable of reading Talmud nor have any of them likely ever tried to. In fact, it is veritably true that Orthodox Jews, the ones who study Talmud more than any other denomination, are far less likely to be progressives than one who doesn’t study Talmud. And yet, because you insist on viewing anything inherently Jewish as threatening and anything threatening as inherently Jewish, you attack a text you know absolutely nothing about by making false claims about it.
I know you have your list of “quotes” from the Talmud but before you start trying to use them you might want to ensure they’re actually real:
http://halakhah.com/
Report this comment
Xiccarph
Mar. 12, 2013 at 2:46pmAh,…. RANGER…..its very easy to understand. Always reduce complicated actions by looking at the most fundamental, underlying foundation of what is being done. Liberals/progressives hate the way America is in a fundamental way, radical Muslims hate America in a fundamental way. The whys and whats are irrelevant. This reduces to the age old adage of…the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Libs will use the Muslims to knowingly/unknowingly (again, the details don’t matter) change America for as long as they are useful, then they too, will become the enemy.
Report this comment
tzion
Mar. 12, 2013 at 2:48pm@Shaman
How ignorant. First of all, only the Shiite branch of Islam has a messiah-like figure. Second, don’t Christians hold that the true messianic era hasn’t come yet? Don’t they believe that even thought the messiah came, none of the great changes that were supposed to accompany it will happen until the 2nd coming? Christianity wasn’t the only messianic branch to form within Judaism nor was it the only one to hold that their “messiah” would return one day. The only thing that separates Christianity from, for example, the Shabbatai Tzvi movement of the 17th century is that Christianity broke off and formed a separate faith with a separate canon.
Report this comment
BehindBlueEyes
Mar. 12, 2013 at 2:55pm@WHERESMYSANDYBEACH
i think you hit on one of the fundamental differences between liberals/progressives and conservatives. You said “a lick of sense”. That could also be called common sense, an attribute liberals seem to be devoid of. When you hit them with the obvious truth they go off into a weird state of denial I can’t comprehend.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Mar. 12, 2013 at 3:29pmPooka_yc, why do you marry Christianity to Judaism. Couldn’t be more foolish, or farther from the truth and reality.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Mar. 12, 2013 at 3:36pmShamanWorld, there is no such entity called Judeo-Christian principles in reality. That concept was invented in the late 19th century and used in the 20th century to wash down our Christian tradition with the minority Judaic traditions. Judeo-Christian is as moronic as Christo-Muslim or Judeo-Muslim.
Report this comment
stablepar
Mar. 12, 2013 at 3:43pmprogressives just simply got caught with their hands in the cookie jar. more to follow i’m sure as the conservatives start fighting back. just the facts ma,am, just the facts…sooner or later hopefully people will start to recognize why islam and freedom can’t find enough room for each other. they are diametrically opposed to each other
Report this comment
paperpushermj
Mar. 12, 2013 at 3:44pmI’m sure you didn’t miss the short laugh that proceeded Mrs Bush’s answer.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Mar. 12, 2013 at 3:48pmTzion, my reference to the Talmud is used to show how irrationally protected it is through the use, and abuse, of labels like antisemitism. It caught your eye because it wasn’t the usual, acceptable, demonization of the Bible and Qur’an that goes on day after day on this site. Funny, I never remember you making such a righteous stand in protection of them.
That’s the anti-Christian and anti-Islam hypocrisy that I see. Jews and Zionists are not special. About time for them to face the same scrutiny as everybody else. None of the others hide behind concepts like antisemitism or victim-hood.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Mar. 12, 2013 at 3:59pmTzion: “Christianity wasn’t the only messianic branch to form within Judaism… .”
Christianity was formed well before Judaism. Christianity did not grow out of Judaism. As a matter of fact, Christ despised the Pharisees, those whose teachings eventually evolved into the religion called Judaism between 300-500 AD.
Don’t confuse the religion Judaism with the practices of the Sadducee, Essene (John the Baptist and Christ)… or the whole host of other religious beliefs found in the Middle East 2000 years ago.
Judaism is a late comer.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/sadducees_pharisees_essenes.html
Report this comment
AvengerK
Mar. 12, 2013 at 4:04pmJERK…my family suffered at the hands of nazi offal like you during WWII.
I don’t see Israelis flying planes into the WTC. I didn’t see Jews dancing in the streets as the planes hit the WTC. I don’t see Jews strapping bombs to their chests and walking into market places. I don’t see Jews yelling “Baruch atta Adenoi” as they behead a christian or a muslim on camera to share on Jihadi websites. I don’t see Jews issuing fatwahs on Danish cartoonists. I don’t see Jews routinely calling for your demise. I don’t see a Jew in the name Major Hassan. I don’t see Jews leading the drug and human trafficking crime wave in Europe today.
All you’ve got champ is the conspiratorial blather of anti-jewish elements on the internet finding conspiracies and malcontent where none are. Now do up your red laces on your doc martens like a good little skin head.
Report this comment
tzion
Mar. 12, 2013 at 4:11pm@Jerk
Who’s hiding? You’re the one always trying to hide yourself from scrutiny. Rather than explain how even one of your views makes sense outside of your own twisted perceptions you always accuse your opponents of going after you because your arguments are “outside the norm”. Every single time I’ve called you antisemitic (which you clearly are) I’ve demonstrated exactly how this is the case. You attack secular Jews for being progressives and communists while spending far less time calling out non-Jewish people of the same persuasions. All this in spite of the fact that there are far more “culture changers” who are non-Jewish than that are. But as if that wasn’t enough, you attack Jewish religious texts studied by the religiously observant Jews, who oppose the choices of the aforementioned secular Jews. The only thing these two groups have in common is that they are Jewish so the fact you would attack both is proof that you are antisemitic. Why else attack those who forsake their culture for communism and progressivism along with those who cling to their culture with both hands while opposing communism?
Report this comment
tzion
Mar. 12, 2013 at 4:27pm@Jerk
You accuse me of not defending the Bible and the Koran? You never defend the Koran either you hypocrite and you frequently describe the Jewish Bible as “imperfect”, “not the word of God”, and other similar statements. Exactly what do you want me to do? I have never attacked the Christian Bible or the Koran. The worst I’ve done is dispute the validity of using Biblical passages as irrefutable history so if that’s somehow criminal you might as well charge me because, being Jewish, I obviously don’t hold that the NT accounts are accurate, valid, or entirely truthful. If I did, I’d be Christian then, right?
As for why I don’t defend the Bible from attacks, for one, I’m not in any way well-versed in the majority of Christian texts and have never even touched a Koran so it’s not as though I could be of any use. I’ve always said that if you don’t know what you’re talking about then you shouldn’t be talking at all and I take that seriously. Why should I be required or expected to defend something which I’m not only unfamiliar with but which I might not even agree with all the time? Seriously Jerk you are sounding more and more Liberal everyday. Quite fitting for a collectivist like yourself.
Report this comment
TH30PH1LUS
Mar. 12, 2013 at 4:31pmErin Burnett’s question betrays the ENTIRE liberal mindset:
“Well, my kids are going to drink anyway, so I might as well get a keg and host the beer party in my house so I can keep an eye out.”
“Well, kids are going to experiment with sex anyway, so we may as well buy condoms and pills and lube and let their boyfriends/girlfriends sleep over. At least their doing it under my roof and it’s “safe”.
“Well, Muslims are going to spew anti-Semitic hatred anyway, so we might as well just reward them with our dollars and fighter planes, and invite them to the highest levels of our government. In the end it will all turn out for the best.”
Idiots on parade!
Report this comment
boomboom
Mar. 12, 2013 at 4:35pmI think this Ibrihim creep is a perfect example of evil on the loose.
Let’s isolate the ‘evil’ gene and make a genetic bomb.
No more ibrimih-ish creeps.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Mar. 12, 2013 at 4:42pmTZION…in asking a jew to defend the new testament, JERK is setting up a false argument.
Just like most Christians can’t answer the militant atheist when it asks them why they’re eating pork, or shellfish or wearing mixed fibres when it asserts the Old Testament.
Rabbinic law does not apply to Christians just as a Jew shouldn’t be expected to adhere to Christian doctrine. But JERK conflates the two in the hope of demeaning Jewish beliefs. Heck..he just tried to state that Christianity predates Judaism. He doesn’t understand the evolution of either faith.
Jew for instance in antiquity used ossuaries as a regular part of their funeral rites. When the loved one’s remains decomposed, the bones were washed and placed in ossuaries in family crypts.
Jews today do not adhere to this practice, nor do they baptise themselves as they did in antiquity. Baptismal pools were common in Jerusalem in antiquity. In fact, Christians kept the practice alive in reverence to John’s baptising of Jesus in the river Jordan.
Jesus’ removal from the cross is a confirmation of Jewish rites for the dead at that time. The head scarf to hide the face, the shroud, the annointing of the body with precious herbs and oils The immediate placement in the tomb and returning to the tomb 3 days later to clean and prepare the body.
Religious practices evolve but JERK doesn’t want to acknowledge that.
Report this comment
tzion
Mar. 12, 2013 at 5:03pm@Jerk
Perhaps you should reread your history. Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes were all opposing sects of the same religious group, which can be treated with the general umbrella term, Judaism. Your argument that Essenes didn’t practice Judaism is akin to saying that Shiite Muslims are a separate religion from Sunnis. Perhaps next you’ll tell me that the Karaites weren’t practicing Judaism either.
Second, who are you to suggest that Judaism is a “late comer”? The Mishnah, the basis for the Talmud and, by extension, all Jewish law, was written down in the 3rd century. By comparison, Christianity was little more than a disorganized idea prior to the Council of Nicaea 325 CE. The earliest Christians actually kept kosher, observed the Jewish holidays and prior the the aforementioned Council Easter was celebrated based on the Jewish lunar calendar. They were still debating in the 4th century what their religion even was. By comparison, everything that was written down in the Mishnah and later texts was taken from the oral traditions that had been passed down for generations.
The Pharisees observed the laws of Judaism and unlike today they actually had a court to enforce them. The Mishnah is essentially the very legacy of the Pharisees written down for preservation. Many of the Rabbis cited in it were Pharisees from as early as the 1st century.
Report this comment
tzion
Mar. 12, 2013 at 5:13pm@avergerk
One minor correction: Jews today, at least in the more observant circles, do practice a form of baptism. Every religious Jewish community has a mikveh for purification and there are many such mikvehs in Israel that are popular tourist destinations. Today it is primarily used by women after their period and after giving birth, both of which create a state of ritual impurity. While impure, women are forbidden to engage in sexual relations, which is why unmarried women often go for the first time before their wedding.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Mar. 12, 2013 at 5:47pmAppreciate the correction TZION. To clarify though..”baptisms” in Jewish life today are not what they were in antiquity. They’re taken on a different aspect.
It also goes to demostrate my earlier point…a christian it not expected to be immersed (no pun intended) in Jewish practices and canon just as a Jew shouldn’t be expected to be the same with Christian practices and canon.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Mar. 12, 2013 at 6:03pmOne more point JERK…
The plaque placed above Jesus’ head on the cross as confirmed by the texts….
I”ll give you the Greek (phonetic) as my Latin is abysmal.
It was written in three languages, Latin, Greek and Aramaic.
INBI….”Iesous Nazareos Basilaion ton Iudaion”.- “Jesus of Nazareth King of the Jews”.
I”ll try the latin from memory just the same..INRI…”Iesus Nazaraeus Rex Iudaeum”- “Jesus of Nazareth King of the Jews”.
If Christianity predates Judaism as you foolishly offered, why isn’t it saying “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Christians”?
Pharisees, Sadduccees, Essenes etc were all sects of Judaism at the time of Jesus. The great temple still stood. Jesus’ passion, death and resurrection occured at the time of Pasach..Passover.
In fact, the older Christian cultures..Greek, Italian, French etc all use a variation on the word Pascha as their name for Easter. Pascha is a variation on the word Pasach for Passover and it’s used because of the proximity of the passion to passover. Furthermore, Jesus was celebrating Passover at the last supper.
Report this comment
FOREIGNANDDOMESTIC
Mar. 12, 2013 at 8:33pm@RANGER
Keep in mind that Islam is not a religion. It is a totalitarian system of governance. So there’s the political element, i.e., “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” But it goes much deeper than that. The Left is not anti-religion, per se. They are anti-God. Give liberals any belief system or ideology that opposes Jesus, his people and his land, and they will make an unholy alliance with it.
Report this comment
rosegrower
Mar. 13, 2013 at 12:35pmThe_Jerk
So, how many rabidly orthodox Jews have tried to convert YOU????? If you knew anything about the Jews and Judaism, then you would know that evangelism is totally forbidden in Judaism. The “culture changers” you claim to abhor are nothing more than dyed-in-the-wool leftists, Marxists and statists, like your hero, Adolph Hitler. And the first thing each of these types do is to try and annihilate religion and religious people, beginning with the one that has had the most profound effect on western culture, Judaism. So Jerk, I would say that YOU are a member of the cult that you claim to abhor, based on your “thinking” and what you espouse. Just sayin’……..
Report this comment
braddock66
Mar. 14, 2013 at 9:12pmBurnett is dumb as a rock but I sure would like to give her my pipe to smoke on!
Report this comment
momrules
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:24amAvengerk……….I understand the mechanics of the liberal mindset but thank God I do not understand the liberal mind. For someone like me that grew up in Old America, that loves America and is patriotic, the liberal mind is like a foreign language that I neither speak nor understand.
Report this comment
PATTY HENRY
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:45amIn order to be a liberal, you have to be an “idealist without a clue about reality”. It also helps to believe in nothing. Liberals (for the most part) do not believe in GOD, have no idea what the word FAITH or GRACE means and basically they feel that they are here (alive) and it’s up to them (Not GOD) to “make everything perfect”. They cannot believe that we can’t make everything wonderful. They are on a direct collision course with the GOD who created everything. They don’t want Punishment, lessons, or ‘trouble’ of any type. They can’t see why ALL people can’t just behave..but behave in the way THEY think they should: Everyone think alike, look alike, do what they are told. THEY want a world of ROBOTS who are born (some of us who manage to avoid being aborted), live and die (early so as not to cost any one money) and never make waves, never question authority, never get out of their little rut. YOU know this is true. TO be anything special; to create anything different than has already been created; to QUESTION….all of these things upset the LIBERAL APPLE CART.
They pretend to be doing “good for mankind” and yet the more they try to control people, the worse things get for all of us and then they get angry and fight to control MORE. These are mental 3 year olds. They cannot connect the dots – ever. You can tell them one thing and they accept it, but they cannot think what the NEXT thought should be. They are dead inside.
Report this comment
PATTY HENRY
Mar. 12, 2013 at 12:00pmIn order to rule the world, Communists from RUSSIA, TOLD USA in the early 50′s that they would take us over like an apple rotting from the inside. In order to achieve this the Communists sent over Teachers they had been training to “be Americans” (in real American villages in Russia-complete with products Russians had not seen in their stores…washing machines, TVS, large refrigerators and all those things that Americans took for granted) ; They infiltrated our COLLEGES and UNIVERSITIES with their very LIBERAL, Communistic believing Professors; The infiltrated our entertainment industry and began that ” If it feels good – do it” demoralization of America. WE (Americans) were totally unready for this type of “take over”. A Senator (Joe McCarthy R-Wisconsin) tried to warn us, but Wisconsin was and still is a hot bed for this liberal “make it good for everyone at the expense of freedom” philosophy. He was snuffed out. For a while, Communists were touted as the bad guys (duck under our desks to avoid THE BOMB) etc. But in general, they never went away…they just dug in. IN a sentence: THIS LIFE is for one purpose only: DECIDING whether or not to FOLLOW GOD. WE have a choice to follow GOD or go to hell. IT has nothing to do with ‘living a great,comfortable life (but that is possible to those who can follow GOD’s 10 Commandments) THIS IS NOT ‘the LIFE’ that God created us for. This is the Training Ground to separate the Sheep from the Goats.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Mar. 12, 2013 at 12:34pmThink any reporter ever asked Eleanor Roosevelt if we should accept some Nazi rhetoric?
Report this comment
50211bs
Mar. 12, 2013 at 1:44pmYou’re not alone mom.
Report this comment
elosogrande
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:22amBurnett is a dolt. If the woman in question wants an award for anti-semitism or anti-Americanism, she should be able to get her award, but not from America. she’s free to get her award in egypt, Saudi Arabia, or from any other pest hole, where she might want to spew her crap.
The thing that surpises me most is that people like her refer to the people of Israel as “filthy”. What irony to hear such a foul pig call another human being filthy.
Report this comment
50211bs
Mar. 12, 2013 at 1:49pmWanna bet that BhusseinO will be giving her an award!
Report this comment
RivahMitch
Mar. 12, 2013 at 1:59pmI think that what most people are willfully overlooking is that the White House and Billary knew that she was anti-American and wanted to quickly slip her the award (before the US citizens could react) to send another confirming message of their support of the emerging caliphate.
Report this comment
azitdad
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:20amHuh. Leave it to a Liberal to be comfortable with anti-semitism.
Report this comment
Oiam21
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:29amHow about we accept anti-newsanchorism? That’s where we don’t listen to them because they are obviously so stupid.
Report this comment
overthecliff
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:19amCome on Erin! Even Obama backed away from this. What are you thinking? A question like that coming out of your mouth is really scary.
Report this comment
Deborah
Mar. 12, 2013 at 4:47pmBecause with liberals the ends justify the means. And that means any means.
Report this comment
icarenough
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:18amErin Burnette’s last job was with CNBC, and I’ll never forget the stupid question she asked as they had the debt clock on the screen turning it’s numbers and her question was. “Is that for real, or animation?” I damned near choked on my coffee that morning. Pea brained.
Report this comment
mikem1969
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:32amWell, pea brained pretty much describes 99.9% of liberals and progressives out there.
Report this comment
happ77
Mar. 12, 2013 at 4:57pmA pretty little Airhead.
Report this comment
TXGal
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:18amWho, I say, Who in their right mind watches CNN? It is just a bunch of garbage!
Report this comment
jakartaman
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:27amI have not watched CNN since 1995.
Good for Laura Bush to laugh and say NO to such a stupid liberal question.
Report this comment
mtnmancurt
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:39amNobody in the right mind watches CNN or MSNBC
Report this comment
IMCHRISTIAN
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:15amIf the government wants you to change and have only 2 children are you willing to get rid of the no 3 child that comes? If you have morals and ethics you would not, Why would we change to what is morally and ethically wrong just for change. God help us if we make change for the worst or even ask such stupid questions.
Report this comment
RodT82721
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:14amEriin is another fine example of a completely brain washed robot for the left. The product of our public education system, that is controlled by socialist unions. And every years thousands more are turned loose to go forth and harm.
Report this comment
Jobeycool
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:12amJournalism is going down the drain badly in this country.
Report this comment
AmericanStrega
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:23amGoing, going, GONE!
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:07amOnce again we see the truth of the media coming out – the final push for Communism is on in full.
Report this comment
Exidor
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:15amI think you’re exactly right. The acceleration of this ideal, particularly with this second term, is staggering. It’s deeply entrenched in our MSM, where even the low information voter isn’t even watching. It’s brainwashing.
Report this comment
LetThereBeLight
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:34amI see it as more than communism they are pushing…. it’s all out Anti-Christ! Anything based on truth, freedom or Christianity, is exactly what they seek to destroy! But Jesus has other plans, and I happen to be with Him!!! :)
Report this comment
fmadsen
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:58amSo Erin please ask the following: To Michelle Obama, 1. “should we accept the racism of the KKK if we want to be inclusive in the USA.”, 2. “should we accept the burning of hundreds of Christian Churches and murder of thousands of Christians in Muslim countries to work toward peace in the region.”
Erin is a absolute idiot for asking this question and should apologize to her listening audience of 10 people. She is one of CNNs more moderate commentators and why I will not turn on CNN. They are crazy Progressive Democrats who don’t even realize how nutty and dangerous they are.
Report this comment
eat-more-bacon-USA
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:51amErin Burnett is a raging liberal – this argument of accepting anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism “when we want to make change” is exactly the SAME ARGUMENT that liberals make in regard to the United States. This is how obama’s radical liberals think.
Report this comment
momrules
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:51amIt is a sad and telling statement on today’s America that this question was even asked.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:07amMOMRULES…you have to understand the liberal mind. How do you think a domestic terrorist like Bill Ayers can be a political king maker in Chicago and a college professor rather than waiting on death row for his lethal injection? Liberal moral relativism.
How do you think a communist like Van Jones can have a regular voice on a panel on CNN? Liberal moral relativism.
How do you think a 31 year old Georgetown university law student can demand the tax payer pay for her contraceptives and rather than be laughed out of town, she’s paraded around the DNC convention like Joan of Arc? Liberal moral relativism.
To the glassy eyed Erin we did something wrong by refusing to salute Ibrahim and her regular verbal attacks on Jews and the U.S. I assure you, in little Erin’s eyes…it’s made even worse because we slighted Moochelle Obama by questioning the decision to recognize Ibrahim. In Erin’s liberal world view…you simply don’t question an Obama. And look at who she threw the question at? Laura Bush..a woman who didn’t affect policy during her husband’s tenure as president..she merely represented the Red Cross..an organization she was active in before her husband became president. The question was tailored as a “gotcha” believing Mrs Bush was a dumb rube (“Palin-esque” in Erin’s eyes) but clearly she’s never heard or seen Laura Bush speak and present herself. Laura Bush woman is a picture of poise and class. Laura Bush 1- Erin Burnett 0.
Report this comment
Zipit
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:31amWell Stated! AVENGERK…..
Report this comment
momrules
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:47amAvengerk……..I replied to you but it was posted alone. By the way……….I agree with Zipit, yours was a well-stated post.
Report this comment
TheEDGE
Mar. 12, 2013 at 6:04pmAvenjerk has pretty much been on fire today.
Report this comment
TheEDGE
Mar. 12, 2013 at 6:07pmOops. Avengerk.
Report this comment
Mainer forever
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:48amDear GOD….what a sick world we live in. Why are there NO Journalists? So sick of the liberal media.
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:56amThere are no journalists today due to the Public Education System…It has been hijacked by the Communists for at least 40 years and they have brainwashed all the students…We are now seeing the fruits of the Communists labor……Anyone who Cares about America should remove their children from Public School…
Report this comment
jcldwl
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:56amWhy did Laura Bush grace this woman of hatred with an interview? That’s my question. If the liberal media could not interview anyone but whom they agree with they would disappear.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:16amBINGO INDYGUY….that’s exactly the problem. The left has done such a good job in the colleges that we get dullards like Burnett infesting our homes and calling themselves “journalists”.
They’re so marinated in leftism and an innate hatred towards conservatives that today this kind of question is absolutely fine to them.
The discussion has gone so far to the left that a shill like Burnett can be considered “moderate” and no one stops to ask “moderate as compared to what”? Chairman Mao?
You have to remember…CNN is the network that gave us the corpulent Candy Crowley and her lie during the debate to save Obama. She was so sure of Obama’s statement in the Rose Garden to Mitt Romney and the whole nation saw it….then mere hours later…she recanted it..before a much smaller CNN audience..the damage had already been done.
Report this comment
tajloc
Mar. 12, 2013 at 4:08pmI agree with JD… Why did Laura even go on TV here. They did this with Nancy Reagan also. It was simply a trap.
The lib/pro believes in the perfectibility of man. We are evolving…with jsut the right Gov or leader we can be wonderful…the poor just need a chance. Christ said of the poor “they will always be with us.”
this just means that hidden in the heart of man (you and me) is a desire to turn away from God.
Try the reformed approach. It is in the Bible.
AND try Rom 8:28
Report this comment
Puckrock
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:47amErin you little twerp.
Report this comment
effenmontero
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:53ama twerp with man hands – take a closer look . . .
Report this comment
Cavallo
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:46amOh.. I thought they were going to talk about OWS.
Report this comment
SpankDaMonkey
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:46am.
I wonder if we sent Erin to Egypt to be finger diddled about half to death like that Laura Logan if she would still ask stupid questions?……
Report this comment
AvengerK
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:45amI neglected to add to my previous post….it’s so refreshing to see a first lady again with genuine class and poise. Laura Bush has always been a very classy woman. Her answer to Erin deer-in-the-headlights Burnett’s liberal moral relativism was perfect and such a pleasing contrast to the sneering, confrontational, attention-seeking Moochelle and her latest wig.
Report this comment
dmforman
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:54amAgreed. Made me wish that we had her back, as she is truly a roll model for our young women.
Report this comment
AmericanStrega
Mar. 12, 2013 at 11:28amSadly, I believe Laura Bush was our last First Lady. What we have now, in my opinion, cannot even be classified as a “lady”.
Report this comment
AUsername
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:43amIdiots, if you invade their country and attack their people there not going to like you. Also some people are going to hate one day and than change the other and that is the way it is, you can’t stop everyone from hating some of the time.
AvengerK
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:47amumm…AUSER? Not sure if you noticed champ but they took down the WTC before we went to Afghanistan and Iraq. Was it pre-emptive dislike perhaps?
Report this comment
No_More_War_Please
Mar. 12, 2013 at 12:01pmAvengerk,
One of Bin Laden’s stated reasons for the attack on 9/11 was the bombing of Sudan, Afghanistan, and Iraq during the 80′s and 90′s which resulted in the slaughter of thousands of innocent women and children. This is acknowledged in the CIA’s 9/11 commission report. I’m not saying that he or the ones that carried out those horrific acts were justified in their actions, but we have been hurting these people far longer than they have been hurting us.
In fact, in 1998 Ron Paul even predicted that America was inviting a 9/11-like event to occur because of our undeclared bombing of these countries.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzbEWYi_CI8
Something to think about.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Mar. 12, 2013 at 12:44pmLOL…we’ve been hurting them far longer than they’ve been hurting us huh NO MORE?
So I’m going to take the word of a sociopathic jihadi am I? I’m going to ignore the countless hijackings, kidnappings, bombings etc that Islamists have been committing for decades and just focus on incidents in the Sudan, Afghanistan and Iraq am I? I’m going to ignore the fact that we intervened on the side of Muslims in Kosovo. I’m going to ignore the BILLIONS of dollars in aid and infrastructure to muslim lands in Africa, Asia and the middle east. I”m just going to concern myself with the delusions of whacked out jihadis and their propaganda campaigns.
You’re an idiot.
Report this comment
No_More_War_Please
Mar. 12, 2013 at 1:17pmAvengerk,
No one is taking anyone’s word. The CIA even admits and defines Bin Laden’s motivation in the its own 9/11 commission report. Are the higher ups who wrote that a bunch of idiots as well?
Your name-calling does not justify the illegitimate killing of innocents. Your ignorance has blinded you to the harvest of hatred that America’s actions has reaped world wide. Does their religion play some role? Perhaps. But the last thing you want to do is give a radical sociopath a reason to come after you. They whole issue is that Bin Laden’s words, unfortunately, do have some truth to them. And to ignore this is to blindly concede that you are ignorant of how the world works.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Mar. 12, 2013 at 2:29pmLOL….oh yes of course NO MORE….”the moral high ground”. And I loved that little lefty rote you got in there…”harvest of hatred” and an allusion to that “evil” Christianity. It didn’t take much to make your mask fall off.
I call you an idiot because you are an idiot. I know the roots of Bin Laden and his kind’s animus towards the US. He was a wahaabist. He saw any kind of cooperation between the Saudis and the US as an afront to Islam’s holiest site..Mecca..in Saudi Arabia. He and his kind want all western influence erased from Islamic lands..and of course..the Caliphate has to grow so that territory will grow too. But Muslim Bro Morsi is happy to take hundreds of millions of dollars in aid from the US nonetheless. African Islamist kleptocrats are happy to have American soldiers die over there and millions of dollars in their accounts while we’re trying to save their populations. Bosnian Muslims are happy to have Americans kill Serbs for them while they and their Albanian muslim cousins are the biggest kidnappers, drug lords and human traffickers in Europe today.
And then there’s all those radical muslims in the UK..born in the UK, never affected by “Harvests of hate”…that want to kill westerners just the same. Then there’s fatwahs issued on Danish Cartoonists. What about those Basque seperatists and their bombings in Spain? Muslims right?
But of course..it’s because of some stuff in the 80′s according to you and Osama.
Report this comment
tzion
Mar. 12, 2013 at 2:53pm@auser
This coming from the person who doesn’t believe in morality? Here’s my question to you: what would logically be wrong with launching overwhelming, decisive attacks to prevent these people who hate us from causing anymore harm? The very fact you will never endorse such a strategy is proof that you do have your own moral code, as arbitrary and subjective as it may be.
Report this comment
AUsername
Mar. 12, 2013 at 4:57pmwhen Americans are do not have a house, car and other luxuries i don’t think any money should be going to people who are not a threat to us but simply don’t like us for something we did in the past. Killing people creates more avengers who simply want revenge for someones death. the more you do it the more haters you create and the more trouble for yourself you create. Its costs money that should go to Americans who need help and it creates more people who want revenge for the unjust death the troops caused.
Report this comment
No_More_War_Please
Mar. 12, 2013 at 7:10pmAvengerk,
Your callousness and apathy towards human suffering is truly astounding. You have a clueless ignorance and a Walmart-parking-lot arrogance that’s off the charts so it’s no wonder as to why all of what I say seems like such a mystery to you. You draw from the 3×5 card of establishment opinion and say, “well they must hate us because we’re free! or because we’re Christian!” You use your arrogance to make ad hominem attacks and claim that I’m attacking Christianity somehow. When did I ever mention any religion once, let alone Christians? Never.
That fact is, that no one who has any common sense buys your propaganda. No one buys your song about spreading freedom and human rights. America has supported countless sordid dictators ruling by army and torture chamber (the Saudis you seem to be a fan of being a current example). We have put many dictators on their thrones, such as Pinochet in Chile, Saddam Hussein in Iraq, and the Shah of Iran just to name a few. Others notice that the only country that openly and proudly tortures prisoners is…us.
Report this comment
No_More_War_Please
Mar. 12, 2013 at 7:11pmAlways, the underlying problem is meddling. Bin Laden’s guys didn’t attack New York because it was a slow morning and they couldn’t think of anything else to do. They were furious at US meddling in Muslem lands. You may think, and I may think, that Islam is a primitive faith not well adapted to the modern world. Fine. I may think that hornets do not have an ideal social organization. But I know better than to poke their nest.
This is why they hate us – meddling, bombing, invading, droning, telling them how to run their countries. No, Avengerk, it is not because of our freedoms.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Mar. 13, 2013 at 12:25pmLOL….yes NO MORE…we brought it on ourselves. Had we listened to their demands and stayed away we’d be fine now. They’d never have attacked us.
You make a fundamental error in your citing that CIA 9/11 report. It’s merely offering how OBL propagandized, the pretexts he chose to cite, not how it really is.
You’re so immersed in your “its’ our fault” mentality that you can’t understand how a wahaabist like OBL thinks. We have an accord with the Saudis. We were allowed to use Saudi Arabia as a staging ground for Desert Storm in the nineties. We did so because Saddam had just attacked Kuwait and was in the process of taking over their oil infrastructure and killing swaths of their population. But the fact that the Saudis allowed an “infidel” army on the soil that houses Mecca is an abomination to fundamentalists like OBL. In fact OBL recommended to the Saudis to use al Qaeda as security forces rather than allow Americans on “holy” ground. The Saudis of course refused.
You seem to believe I’m naive to OBL’s manipulation of incidents. I’m not. I (unlike you) however understand the bigger picture. Extremists like OBL will utilize any situation and exploit it to further their agenda. As I offered, we have recorded incidents of UK born muslims, never exposed to “harvests of hatred” (LOL) that have been radicalized. Take Spain..the muslims bombed trains, Spain pulled out of the coalition..the bombings continued just the same.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Mar. 13, 2013 at 12:36pmNo NO MORE..the problem is not meddling. The problem is Islamic fundamentalism is incompatible with modern life. We have accords with Saudi Arabia, with Yemen, with the UAE, with Jordan, with Dubai etc. Whether fundamenaltists like it or not, these countries want to do business with and interact with the rest of the world. That means a western presence is felt in those countries. Saudi Arabia is the biggest thorn in fundamentalist Islam’s side. Mecca is there and they see any non muslim presence there as an afront to their religion. You like to cite CIA reports yet exclude OBL’s ultimate goal…the removal of western influence in Saudi Arabia. The next goal of course is the eradication of Israel so as to make the entire region exclusively muslim.
While you were asleep in your “it’s our fault” daze, guess what Egypt just did? They closed the only Jewish temple in Cairo down. You are also aware of the campaign against coptic christians in that country? Do you understand how Hezbollah treats Maronite christians in Lebanon? How about what the Taliban did to Buddhist relics in Afghanistan? Are you getting it now? It doesnt’ matter if OBL says it’s a bombing in the Sudan or a statue of Buddha in Afganistan, they will find an excuse to exploit because they know how fundamentalist Islam thinks. What you’re suggesting is that we obey their demands just the same and all will be well. You’re an idiot. Spain tried it your way..then suffered for it.
Report this comment
No_More_War_Please
Mar. 13, 2013 at 5:24pmhttps://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol48no2/article10.html
“Kinzer would have been better off making a less sweeping judgment: that TPAJAX got the CIA into the regime-change business for good—similar efforts would soon follow in Guatemala, Indonesia, and Cuba—but that the Agency has had little success at that enterprise, while bringing itself and the United States more political ill will, and breeding more untoward results, than any other of its activities. Most of the CIA’s acknowledged efforts of this sort have shown that Washington has been more interested in strongman rule in the Middle East and elsewhere than in encouraging democracy. The result is a credibility problem that accompanied American troops into Iraq and continues to plague them as the United States prepares to hand over sovereignty to local authorities. All the Shah’s Men helps clarify why, when many Iraqis heard President George Bush concede that “[s]ixty years of Western nations excusing and accommodating the lack of freedom in the Middle East did nothing to make us safe, they may have reacted with more than a little skepticism.”
There ya go Avengerk, even the CIA itself admist that intevention = LONG TERM FAIL.
Report this comment
No_More_War_Please
Mar. 13, 2013 at 5:33pmYou are such an ignoramus, it’s beyond comprehension. Yes, Saddam invaded Kuwait, but WHY DID HE INVADE KUWAIT???? Because of a decade long war with Iran that left his country broken and penniless. A war that occurred because our government pushed him into it! Yes, Avengerk, the U.S. supported, funded, and gave Saddam intel that allowed him to begin his reign of terror. Then, after the war with Iran left Iraq broke (after all, we weren’t about to help them foot the bill), Saddam decided that the only way to recoup his losses was to invade the oil rich lands of Kuwait. This alarmed our govenment because of our oil interests in Saudi Arabia- hence Operation Desert Strom. I know, you’ve never heard that side before. I mean, after all, Sean Hannity will never openly criticize the mistakes that have occured because of our insane, bumbling, foreign policy. But you really should try to research these things outside of what Sean, Rush, Levin, and the rest of the mainstream establishment neocons tell you.
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:38amSo should we just accept that there are people that want to kill us and get in bed with them anyway to affect change??? Obama: Yes
Report this comment
Kinnison
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:38amNo, Ms. Burnett, Americans should not accept some anti-Semitism, anti-Americanism, child rape, the murdering of homosexuals, the holding of slaves, female genital mutilation, the stoning of women for being raped, throwing acid into little girls’ eyes because they want to learn to read or any other ridiculous 9th century Safali sort-of-religious crap so we can get along with the Arab Islamist world and “affect change” in the Middle East. Any other really stupid questions you would like to ask?
Report this comment
AvengerK
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:38amFirst of all…Erin’s not the brightest anyway. But the question is typical liberal moral relativism.
The only thing missing from the interview is a shot of Erin frozen on a road as a truck with it’s headlights on races towards her.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:35amIf you watch CNN, it’s certainly no stretch for you to accept some anti-Americanism when there is a Republican in the White House…that’s for damned sure.
Report this comment
Displacedsoutherner
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:40amSir, you are confused. When a Republican is in the White House it’s every American’s patriotic duty to challenge, insult and demean the office holder. When a Democrat is in office it’s an act of treason to challenge the president on anything.
No anti-Americanism to accept at all when the vitriol comes from the Left.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:42amI stand corrected?
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:46amGONZO, Honestly, I thought they were at their nastiest during the Clinton Administrations. They actually lightened up some almost taking a Fox Fair and Balanced attitude…..almost, shortly after GW took office. But, through all of that time until now they are steadily losing viewers. At the pace they have been going, they should about the same viewership as BSNBC.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Mar. 12, 2013 at 10:49amoh and GONZO? Also when a democrat in is office it is our patriotic duty to wipe our feet on the constitution that’s used as a doormat in front of the whitehouse.
Report this comment
YOURSENSEI
Mar. 13, 2013 at 12:30amMr or Ms AVENGECAKE,
This is what you must know:
So, got a thing for Jews do ya?
It is so.
Report this comment