Watch Live: Congressional Hearing on IRS Scandal

Live Now on TheBlaze Radio: ‘The Buck Sexton Show’

Business

Dianne Feinstein Battles Ted Cruz in Heated Senate Showdown Over Guns: ‘I’m Not a 6th Grader’

Mar. 14, 2013 12:23pm Becket Adams

UPDATE:

Someone was caught on a hot mic criticizing Cruz during his closing remarks on the constitution. Watch those clips and see who it might have been here.

–

Sens. Dianne Feinstein & Ted Cruz Testy Senate Judicial Hearing Exchange

California Sen. Dianne Feinstein. (Getty Images).

Senators Ted Cruz and Dianne Feinstein during a Senate Judiciary Hearing on Thursday got into heated exchange while discussing the California congresswoman’s proposed ban on so-called “assault” weapons.

“The question that I would pose to the senior senator from California is,” Cruz said, referring to Feinstein, “Would she deem it consistent with the Bill of Rights for Congress to engage in the same endeavor that we are contemplating doing with the Second Amendment in the context of the First or Fourth Amendment, namely, would she consider it constitutional for Congress to specify that the First Amendment shall apply only to the following books and shall not apply to the books that Congress has deemed outside the protection of the Bill of Rights?”

“Likewise, would she think that the Fourth Amendment’s protection against searches and seizures could properly apply only to the following specified individuals and not to the individuals that Congress has deemed outside the protection of the Bill of Rights?” he added.

Apparently, Sen. Feinstein was not amused with the Texas senator’s line of questioning.

“I’m not a sixth grader,” said responded. “Senator, I’ve been on this committee for 20 years. I was a mayor for nine years. I walked in, I saw people shot. I’ve looked at bodies that have been shot with these weapons. I’ve seen the bullets that implode. In Sandy Hook, youngsters were dismembered. Look, there are other weapons.”

“I’ve been up — I’m not a lawyer, but after 20 years I’ve been up close and personal to the Constitution. I have great respect for it. This doesn’t mean that weapons of war and the Heller decision clearly points out three exceptions, two of which are pertinent here.”

“And so I — you know, it’s fine you want to lecture me on the Constitution. I appreciate it. Just know I’ve been here for a long time. I’ve passed on a number of bills. I’ve studied the Constitution myself. I am reasonably well educated, and I thank you for the lecture,” she added.

The California senator eventually got around to answering Sen. Cruz’ question on how she reconciles her proposed “assault weapons” ban with the Second Amendment.

Her eventual answer? “Assault weapons” are kind of like child pornography. She argued that although we have a First Amendment right to free speech, that doesn’t mean child pornography is protected by the Constitution. Likewise, she continued, so-called “assault weapons” can be legally banned.

Sen. Feinstein later apologized to Sen. Cruz, explaining that he “got her dander up.”

–

Follow Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) on Twitter

(H/T: The Weekly Standard). Featured images Getty Images.

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (908)

showmerancher
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:43pm
When government punishes law-abiding citizens for the crimes of criminals by usurping the people’s Constitutionally guaranteed rights and freedoms, the rule of law is lost as is the credibility of that government.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- michaelmoron
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:12pm
  This is what you must know:
  
  This defacto representative should be in a prison cell right now, facing fines and a 5-year prison sentence, for Breach of trust and sedition.
  
  It is so.
  
  Report this comment
- Mil-Dot
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:15pm
  This old bat will not disarm this country. Not her, her goons or any combination of alphabet soup govt cretins.
  
  Report this comment
- michaelmoron
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:18pm
  This is also what you must know:
  
  This is NOT a REPRESENTATIVE of the PEOPLE.
  
  Senator Dianne Feinstein in Washington, DC is a private company categorized under Government Offices-Us. Our records show it was established in and incorporated in District of Columbia.
  
  http://www.manta.com/c/mm8ht18/senator-dianne-feinstein
  
  Report this comment
- TH30PH1LUS
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:22pm
  By equating guns to child-pornography, Dianne Feinstein’s answer to all of Ted Cruz’s questions is a resounding YES. She states clearly that she “comes from a different place”. She clearly sees her role as a re-definier of what Liberty is, what Rights are, and also – I will add – she is clearly confused about what the words “military weapons” means (in spite of her claims of being reasonably well-educated).
  
  She represents governance from emotionalism, rather than from rational thought. When trying to discuss the Constitution, she diverts to “dead bodies” and gore – refusing to engage in logic, and rushing into panic-mode.
  
  She sees herself as on a holy & righteous crusade to “save the children” by destroying Liberty. She represents a danger to the Republic.
  
  “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” ~ Benjamin Franklin
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:24pm
  Dianne Feinstein will take your freedoms. She is a cultural changing, tradition destroying, I want to rule your life, Jewish progressive. This is the predominant philosophy of their culture.
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:27pm
  I hate when my bullets implode. It’s even worse when they cross a trans-dimensional warp hole and vector into an alternate quantum reality.
  
  Feinstein’s answer? She didn’t. She snarked, she belittled, she sneered, she put on arrogance like it was a mink coat. But she didn’t answer. Saying “you can’t yell fire in a theater” is not the same as saying “the 1st Amendment only applies to these books, but not those books”. She knows that. Well, I assume she does, she may be so full of herself that reality cannot penetrate her thick head. Even if it goes through a trans-dimensional warp hole.
  
  Report this comment
- RabidPatriot
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:31pm
  This radical progressives argument is logically disabled. At no time is child pornography legal. In her mind, soldiers, Marines, and most police officers possess the equivalent of child porn. It is an absurd argument made by an absurd politician. She speaks of all of her time in office as if it makes her an expert in anything besides convincing stupid people to vote for her over and over again.
  
  Report this comment
- seahawk1a
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:33pm
  My response to Senator Feinstein would be to ask where there are people using child pornography legally. What a ridiculous argument. There are millions of gun owners that lawfully possess and use firearms of all kinds, yet we want to regulate it so that we punish the people that follow the law. That makes total sense.
  
  Report this comment
- Cavallo
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:34pm
  The reason child porn is illegal is that it is evidence and continuation of a crime against a child, namely the sexual exploitation of a child. None of her arguments hold water. She is, first and foremost, a fascist. She will go after the 1st amendment and they already have. They consider the constitution an annoyance. They have already severely limited the first amendment already. You must have approval if you are to reach any number of given people, you must have approval if you hold a certain profession or location to speak about politics (FEC FCC IRS). The 4th amendment is already removed. They only really allow it to be referenced in cases of drugs, or local crimes. It doesn’t apply to those who might be deemed suspicious of committing political crimes.
  
  Report this comment
- brother_ed
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:34pm
  @TH3OPLOS1S
  
  I was thinking that when she compared guns to child pornography she upset some of her constituents.
  
  To lump them with gun owners was insulting to them.
  
  I’m pretty sure NAMBLA isn’t a conservative organization.
  
  Report this comment
- RIDEMODELS
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:35pm
  These people are in office to uphold the constitution…..it is their JOB…!!
  
  She needs to climb under a rock with all the Hollywood royalty who believes they are better than “We the People”……
  
  Do your JOB you un educated liberal idiot, do your JOB..!!!
  
  Report this comment
- Cavallo
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:39pm
  @Ghost, Also you should note that you can yell fire in a theater.. if there is a fire. If there is not a fire you are committing fraud. Fraud (as well as Slander and Libel) is not protected under the constitution, just like firing a weapon indiscriminately at people is not protected by the second amendment.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:45pm
  Ridemodels: “She needs to climb under a rock with all the Hollywood royalty who believes they are better than “We the People”……”
  
  Who is Hollywood? They come from the same cultural background. They are cultural changing, tradition destroying, I want to rule your life, Jewish progressives. It’s no hidden secret. They prove it. It is undeniable.
  
  http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column
- FrankieBaby
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:49pm
  Exactly. I WILL NOT COMPLY.
  
  Report this comment
- michaelmoron
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:51pm
  This is what you must Know:
  
  You thought your Tax dollars just financed the Senator Dianne Feinstein PRIVATE COMPANY.
  
  But in actuality, you also pay for her 50-99 Employees. ( 40 employees at the 331 Hart Building
  Office )
  
  It is so.
  
  Report this comment
- TEXASGRANNY73
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:51pm
  @Th30ph1lus She definitely comes from a different place. Consider this. For all the posturing to “save the children” every time we appoint a new justice to the Supreme Court she has no equal practically tearing out her hair to be absolutely sure such candidate would not turn over the abortion law. Seems to me there is a lot of blood and guts spilled and no guns involved killing babies who even have a less chance of survival, zilch to be sure. Seems Patrick Leahy was more than a little upset as well. Ted Cruz is too smart for them and no shrinking violet.
  
  Report this comment
- OKLAPatriot
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:54pm
  Th3…..That was an extremely intelligent post and observation.
  
  Report this comment
- RabbiDRJerkins
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:55pm
  Shalom,
  Good point. I would, however, suggest replacing the word “credibility” with the word “legitimacy” as a more accurate stance.
  
  Report this comment
- Trigus
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:56pm
  “First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out–
  Because I was not a Socialist.
  
  Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out–
  Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
  
  Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out–
  Because I was not a Jew.
  
  Then they came for me–and there was no one left to speak for me.” – Martin Niemoller
  
  18 USC § 1621 – Perjury generally
  Whoever—
  (1)having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or
  (2)in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;
  is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.
  
  Only you can make this Once Great Nation, Great Again!
  
  2013 American Patriot Spring, What will you do?
  
  Report this comment
- Bluebonnet
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:59pm
  So, Ms. Feinstein, “You’re not a 6th grader?” Prove it by acting like an adult for a change. So, you’ve been there a long time? perhaps too long. Time for new conservative thinking! Out with the old.
  
  I’m not a Texan, but love Texas, so Ms. Feinstein, “DON’T MESS WITH TEXAS’
  and stop acting like a know it all just because you’re from that kind of place around SF.
  
  Report this comment
- RabbiDRJerkins
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:04pm
  @the jerk
  Shalom,
  I know it moght be a lot to ask, but could you tone down the anti-semitism a bit? Not all people of Jewish heritage are progressives, and not all progressives are Jewish. In point of fact, as is the case with Christianity, absolutely zero percent of Jewish people who practice the faith they claim are progressives.
  I do not appreciate being equated with the destroyers of this land.
  You are free to speak as you see fit; I am not one who will cry “hate crime” every time someone says something I do not approve of. I merely want to let you know that your statements, because of their linking of Jewish people in general to progressive politics, are wholly inaccurate.
  
  Report this comment
- michaelmoron
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:09pm
  Here is what you must know:
  
  The GOVERNMENT is TRUST !!!!
  
  WE the PEOPLE are the GRANTORS and BENEFICIARIES !!!!
  
  ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS are FIDUCIARY TRUSTEES !!!!
  
  The CONSTITUTION is the RULES of the TRUST that the TRUSTEES MUST FOLLOW !!!!
  
  Under TRUST LAW, a TRUSTEE has NO AUTHORITY over a GRANTOR or BENEFICIARY !!!!
  
  WE the PEOPLE can fire the TRUSTEES, and re-write the RULES of the TRUST (Constitution) !!!!
  
  The ONLY time a TRUSTEE has ANY AUTHORITY over a BENEFICIARY, is when ANOTHER BENEFICIARY has a CLAIM of DAMAGES against the accused !!!!
  
  It is so.
  
  Report this comment
- cosette
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:12pm
  All this pathetic hand wringing from a POS who lives in a gated community, surrounded by armed guards and STILL, by her own admission mind you, carries a gun herself. Unbelievable
  
  Report this comment
- richauthor
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:15pm
  These liberal nags in Congress and the Senate love to pontificate about their power and knowledge, but they can’t take it when the shoe is on the other foot. Remember when the junior senator from California (Boxer) dressed down a respected Army General for addressing her as “Ma’am?”
  
  Stick it to her, Senator Cruz.
  
  Report this comment
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:15pm
  I just wrote to this mouth breathing, liberty hating senator through her email-me web page. I published what I wrote to her on my site as well.
  
  http://www.patriotsdonotcomply.com/index.php/articles/open-letter-diane-feinstein/
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:20pm
  RabbiDRJerkins, you confabulate information and facts with antisemitism. Look, not all communists were/are Jewish, but communism did come from the Jewish culture, Moses Hess and Karl Marx. There were Latvian, Norwegian, Ukrainian… Nazis, but the Nazi movement came from Germany, Germans. Germans created, promoted, and disseminated that movement. Likewise with Jews and communism, now called progressivism.
  
  Many have recognized these facts and information. Sadly, these facts and information hide behind the label of antisemitism; which you have learned so well. Pavlov was able to train his dogs in a very similar manner… a reflex response.
  
  http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zionism_versus_Bolshevism
  
  Report this comment
- searcher619
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:24pm
  It’s amazing to me that she actually admitted to being there for 20 years. That alone shows us she needs to be put to pasture. No one should be in there for anywhere near that long. She is part of the cancer that has been eating away at our personal liberty and constitutionally protected rights.
  
  Report this comment
- normster
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:44pm
  Perhaps her credentials are as impressive as she states. Perhaps is it, in fact, senility that is preventing her from seeing the negative impact of her stance. The fact is, the Constitution provide the “RIGHT” for the American people to bear arms. It does not include child pornography in the Free Speech clause. There is no Constitutional right for people to view pornography of any type. That implication is just as stupid as finding a right to kill your unborn child in the privacy clause.
  
  Report this comment
- BobBrandt
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:44pm
  An “imploding bullet”. Would you consider this a misfire? Lately it seems almost everything Sen. Feinstein says is a misfire. ‘All veterans are mentally ill”, “PTSD is a new problem, a result of the Iraq War”. She is right, she isn’t a sixth grader. However some of the things she says makes one wonder about her mental capacity. To dismember means to remove or sever a part of the body from the body. Did anybody ever say that any of the people killed were dismembered?
  What is her idea of an assault weapon? I have a High Point Carbine. What makes it an assault weapon? when it has its forward grip and tactical stock on it. Remove the grip and change the stock and it isn’t on the list. The mag is 10 rounds but it is an assault weapon. I bet she supports the school district that suspended the kindergarten student for making a finger gun in the playground. Because it would be an assault weapon on the school grounds.
  
  Report this comment
- The Giver
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:49pm
  She talks about Dead bodies and gore… How about all the 3,000 dismembered aborted children every day who never get a chance at life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Nobody is banning the weapon of choice there…. The suction catheter! God forgive us. Nothing ends more lives than the suction catheter. Not even a soda larger than 16 ounces.
  
  Report this comment
- rambosharley
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:50pm
  She’s just ticked-off some little ‘newbee” is slaming her azz!….. LOVE IT! GO SENATOR CRUZ! YEAH BABY!
  
  Report this comment
- JRook
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 3:07pm
  Actually the example of child pornography and yelling fire in a crowded theater are exactly the same issue relative to reasonable limitations regarding the rights provided in the constitution. As the limitations are usually based on placing a higher priority on public safety and protection of group at the expense of the individuals exercise of rights, even if symbolic.
  
  Report this comment
- RabbiDRJerkins
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 3:09pm
  @the jerk
  Shalom,
  Interesting “facts”. A half truth, is still, however, a lie. While the people you cite did indeed have Jewish heritage, the horrors that came forth from them had no origin in that Jewish heritage. Were the Jewish faith or culture a component of Communism, surely someone in over 5000 years of Jewish history would have come up with it before these men. Surely it is the few progressives, the communists who are the abberration, and not the millions if not billions who have lived their lives according to Jewish faith and culture and never come to so deranged a paradigm.
  Progressive and Communist ideals are the antithesis to Jewish belief, and have never been promoted by any of the Jewish faith.
  
  Saying such is the equivalent of making a statement that pedophilia derives from the Catholic faith simply because many who claim that faith, but do in no wise practice it, have been proven to be pedophiles. Just as pedophilia did not arise from the Catholic faith and culture, but rather shows up in those who have completely rejected that faith and culture, so it is with progressivism and the Jewish faith and culture.
  
  It is not through the actions of the slackers and apostates that you uncover the truth of a faith or culture, but through the texts and those who abide by them.
  
  You are free to believe what you will, I simply suggest that believing in the truth might serve you better.
  
  Report this comment
- michaelmoron
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 3:09pm
  “Government is a trust, and the officers of the government are trustees. And both the trust and the trustees are created for the benefit of the people.”
  
  – Henry Clay
  
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  
  Henry Clay, Sr. (April 12, 1777 – June 29, 1852) was a lawyer, politician and skilled orator who represented Kentucky in both the Senate and in the House of Representatives. He served three different terms as Speaker of the United States House of Representatives and was also Secretary of State from 1825 to 1829. He lost his campaigns for president in 1824, 1832 and 1844.
  
  Clay was a dominant figure in both the First and Second Party systems. As a leading war hawk in 1812, he favored war with Britain and played a significant role in leading the nation to war in the War of 1812.
  
  Abraham Lincoln, the Whig leader in Illinois, was a great admirer of Clay, saying he was “my ideal of a great man.”
  
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  
  CONSTITUTION OF MARYLAND
  
  DECLARATION OF RIGHTS.
  
  Art. 6. That all persons invested with the Legislative or Executive powers of Government are the TRUSTEES of the Public, and, as such, accountable for their conduct: Wherefore, whenever the ends of Government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the People may, and of right ought, to reform the old, or establish a new Government.
  
  Report this comment
- Maji
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 3:18pm
  So her argument comes down to her time as a politician….
  Meaning;
  A. “It’s hard to get rid of a crook”.
  B. “I was a liar when you were still in school”
  C. “how dare you tell the true about me I’m seasoned socialists”
  D. All the aboved!
  
  Report this comment
- carbonyes
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 3:27pm
  Dear Ghost of Jefferson:
  Read your letter to Mrs. Feinstein(she should be defrocked from her title as Senator) and agree 100% with your stance against the b!tch. She is an old bag and certainly not fit to serve as a US Senator. Like most liberal senators, she has no common sense nor horse sense either. She has a disease – liberalism. The disease of liberalism has been researched and defined by Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr. M.D., a forensic psychiatrist with over 35 years of clinical experience.
  His book is titled “The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness” and can be purchased on Amazon or the doctor’s website, http://www.libertymind.com
  You will find Mrs. Feinstein and Mrs. Asterbuilt’s pet horse(Barbara Boxer) along with Nancy Pelosi, and don’t forget the Schumer’s and Durbin’s of life, explained in explicit detail. There are all kinds of names and tabs you can place on them, but the most accurate one would be mental. That should disqualify them as not fit to serve, but we are still behind the times. Therefore we might have to arrange to drag them kicking and screaming out of Congress and place them in the looney farm that was used for “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest”. They could then pal around with Jack Nicholson. Lovely group of people. They might want to add a couple wings for a number of the others who would fit well there. We probably could take up a collection to fund their permanent stay. We would save on taxes as well.
  
  Report this comment
- angeleyes63
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 3:37pm
  Not only that but it will cause many law abiding citizens to become criminals by virtue of government mandates infringing upon the second amendment.
  
  Report this comment
- Bowlz
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 3:54pm
  She talks like she’s been in the nitty gritty and I simply don’t believe that. She’s been there 20 yrs???? Time to go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why can’t people just use the guns she allows????? Who does she think she is to tell anyone anything? Cruz nailed her and hit her in a place that frazzled this ‘seasoned warrior’ of politics. He used simple truth and logic to knock this elitist off her game. Cruz is awesome.
  
  Report this comment
- Fremont
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 4:12pm
  The 2nd Amendment is the ONLY legal law concerning our RIGHTS as individuals to keep (own) and bear (carry) arms in these United States. NO government federal, state, country, city, and NO treaty with any other government, etc. has any right to make any law concerning arms – the US Constitution trumps a federal treaty. (This means getting rid of the Firearms in The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE). All citizens have the NATURAL right to protect themselves, family and property from all transgressors. The Bill of Rights covers every citizen in the United States of America, no matter what US State or US Territory he or she may reside. In other words they are INDIVIDUAL Rights.
  
  The 2ND Amendment reads: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
  
  Really, how hard is it to understand: Shall Not Be Infringed?
  
  Report this comment
- RabbiDRJerkins
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 4:15pm
  @Angeleyes63
  Shalom,
  None of their actions can cause law abiding citizens to become criminals. They may indeed call them criminals, but name calling does not make something so.
  No law that they have passed in this country that is contrary to the constitution is valid. They have the power to arrest, but that should never be confused with the right to arrest.
  In passing these laws, it is the senators and representatives who make themselves criminals by violating the Constitution, the real law of the land.
  The only citizens who make themselves criminals are those who comply with the unconstitutional laws, and who, when they have the opportunity, do not act to remove the real criminals from their invalid positions of power through any means that are at hand.
  
  The opinion of another does not determine my nature or alter my being.
  
  Remember, any who act to restore the Constitution, any who act in accordance with the Constitution, are defined as criminals and terrorists by this government. Those who now stand against treason are now called traitors. I am in good company when standing with any who are so branded by the government, for I would rather be called a criminal and a traitor, than be a criminal and traitor.
  
  Report this comment
- johnconnolly
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 4:31pm
  I was under the impression that our elected official took an oath and swore to protect and defend the Constitution not limit the peoples rights. and did i hear correctly,that durbin said our rights are temporary. where does this guy get off saying such a thing. he should go back to chicarge with the rest of the corrupt politicans. Even mayor Daaly could not stand this administration. He left.
  
  Report this comment
- happ77
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 4:33pm
  Carbonyes….. That was an excellent book.
  
  Report this comment
- SavvyCowboy
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 4:33pm
  BULLY for Senator Cruz!!!!! Franken-fein and the “GOP Establishment” are all the same – leftist elitist morons!
  
  Report this comment
- techengineer11
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 4:48pm
  I’d be willing to go out on a limb and say that whoever was criticizing Cruz was likely Jewish..
  
  Anyone take the bet? Come on.. You win you get to tell me how hateful and racist I am and how I’m just a dumb anti Semite, etc..
  
  Take the bet. I don’t know who he was and it hasn’t been confirmed but I know how much those people hate my Constitution and hate my country.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Cabrito_Goat
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 4:56pm
  I must say, this woman deserves all the animosity directed at her.
  
  ‘ John Locke reasoned that God gave the earth and everything in it to the whole human family as a gift. Therefore the land, the sea, the acorns in the forest, the deer feeding in the meadow belong to everyone “in common.” However, the moment someone takes the trouble to change something from its original state of nature, that person has added his ingenuity or labor to make that change. Herein lies the secret to the origin of “property rights.” ‘ -The 5000 Year Leap
  
  Property rights are sacred, because infused inside every man’s property is his essence, the sweat and trial he had to endure to obtain something the honest way.
  
  I’d like to think this applies to money as well, which is why even taxes are seen as an affront to natural law. Not my idea, the idea of the enlightenment thinkers who helped forge America.
  
  Report this comment
- Dougsopinion
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:01pm
  Did she just mention imploding bullets? Isn’t that what hollowpoints do? Why is it legal for homeland security, social security, noaa, and any other government agency to have them? Such hypocracy. I think she did alot of 6th graders a disservice with her stupid statement.
  
  Report this comment
- turkey13
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:08pm
  She will never let anyone touch the 4Th ammendment because another Senator can show up and search her and find all those envelopes filled with cash.
  
  Report this comment
- michaelmoron
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:10pm
  @Fremont
  
  Great post.
  
  They created the Indefinite detention bill for people that know their rights, the CONSTITUTION and the LAW.
  
  They have given themselves the authority to execute any American, without due process or evidence.
  
  They have done this, because they know that the educated people could easily win their case with 12 of their peers, and expose the system’s fraud.
  
  Instead, they classify the informed Patriots as “Right-wing, Anti-American, Anti-Government, Domestic Terrorists” that can be assassinated without a trial.
  
  These “representatives” are clearly the true Criminals and Terrorists.
  
  Any lawyer knows the difference between ‘MAY’ and ‘SHALL’.
  
  75% of these POS politicians are lawyers. They know that it did not say’ MAY not be infringed’.
  
  ‘MAY’ would give them the ambiguity to achieve this act of regulation, because ‘MAY’ allows for OPTIONS.
  
  ‘SHALL’ means that There are NO OPTIONS !!!!
  
  Report this comment
- NHwinter
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:13pm
  http://www.youtube.com/embed/9RABZq5IoaQ?feature=player_embedded
  
  This is a powerful 3 min. video by Black Americans in support of the NRA. A must watch!!
  
  Report this comment
- notsurewhatshappeninghere
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:14pm
  @GHOSTOFJEFFERSON –
  
  “I hate when my bullets implode. It’s even worse when they cross a trans-dimensional warp hole and vector into an alternate quantum reality.”
  
  I almost fell over laughing. Thanks for that!!
  
  Report this comment
- techengineer11
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:19pm
  The_Jerk
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:20pm
  RabbiDRJerkins, you confabulate information and facts with antisemitism.
  
  That was a very informative post. (I appreciate the comment to Gonzo the other day as well.. that attitude more than any other needs to be called out)
  
  RabbiDRJerkins: While I appreciate your concern I wholly side with the jerk on this matter. I believe that the correlation between Jews and Communism is about as high as any correlation you find in a real world environment probably rivaling the correlation with being black and voting for a Democrat.
  You ask a lot of us RabbiDRJerkins. I realize that there are some really good Jews who actually appreciate my founding fathers and the Constitution which my forefathers left for me to guard & protect but they are such a minority and the ones who continually rail against my most treasured possessions are so loud, rich, and powerful.
  
  I personally don’t want any violence but we are going to eventually have to have a parting.
  
  Report this comment
- shoulda coulda woulda
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:21pm
  Shes not a 6th grader, i dont know. She certainly doesn’t act like a US Senator. She acts like a little kid lashing out at someone who knows more than you.
  
  Report this comment
- techengineer11
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:23pm
  NHwinter
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:13pm
  http://www.youtube.com/embed/9RABZq5IoaQ?feature=player_embedded
  
  This is a powerful 3 min. video by Black Americans in support of the NRA. A must watch!!
  
  Many say they support 2nd amendment.. marriage, and family values; however, 95% vote for the Democrat so we have a rather large disconnect here woudn’t ya say?
  
  Something just does not add up.
  
  Report this comment
- jowettusmc
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:26pm
  Amen !!!
  
  Report this comment
- Bum thrower
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:27pm
  She identified the problem when she said she’d been in the Senate for over TWENTY years; she is the poster girl for TERM LIMITS. The rest of her statement is excuses and 90 Octane BS!!
  
  Report this comment
- Lucy Larue
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:50pm
  SHOWMERANCHER
  Amen sir! AfreakingMEN!
  
  Senator(Bachelor’s degree in NOTHING) Feinstein told it all when she said that she had sat on that committee for 20 years. That is twenty years too long!
  She with her 60′s pageboy fluff has stayed too long at the proverbial fair. She epitomizes what is wrong with D.C.! She is odious!
  
  She behaves as though she is a member of the “Royal Court of Barry Dunham”. There is not supposed to be a Royal Court in The United States.
  Guess what? We have one now.
  Guess what some more. We created this mess. We did. We paid no attention.
  “As ye sow,so shall ye reap”.
  Every citizen of this nation should be marching to Washington armed with tar, feathers, and rails for EVERY Congressman and Senator with few exceptions. We’re not.
  We are letting this happen.
  
  All who post here should be calling their Senators ,their Congressman, and their President every day to register their disgust.
  
  White House comment line (202)456-1111…,Capitol Switchboard (202)224-3121. If you have the time to post…,you have the time to call.
  
  We are watching the loss of our nation.
  
  WATCHING!
  
  I post from Wonderland. Down is up. Up is down. We’re painting the roses red. And as the Cheshire Cat said,to sweet Alice, “We’re ALL mad here”.
  
  Report this comment
- RedHarley
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:52pm
  What she knows about guns…..AND the Constitution would not fill a thimble.
  
  Report this comment
- NHwinter
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 6:04pm
  techengineer11 – Maybe, just maybe, things are not adding up for Black Americans, finally!!!!!
  
  Report this comment
- 19freedom53
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 6:14pm
  When our forefathers wrote the 2nd amendment giving citizens the right to bear arms, they did not specify what kind of arms. They did not write that citizens can only use bow and arrows, shovels and axes, but not muskets or cannons.It is the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS,
  
  Report this comment
- Wolfgang the Gray
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 6:20pm
  She is the face of the enemy. You cannot debate the Constitution with you because she feels that you are stupid, she knows better than you (because you are stupid), and you should shut up & let her decide what is right & what is wrong. Your job in this country is to go and work so you can pay the taxes to provide her with a good living. Your freedom & liberty is not an issue. If she were to ban all guns in the country, murders would still happen because the guns are tools, not the source of the evil. Her logic is invalid, but she doesn’t care because in her mind, we are all stupid & nothing we can say will change her mind. It will eventually come down to whether those in this country that still value freedom & liberty are willing to fight to keep it. That is what DHS is preparing for (1.6 Billion rounds of ammo, 7000 fully automatic “Personal Defense Weapons”, 2717 Light Armored Tanks, Range targets with pictures of pregnant women/children/elderly laides in their kitchen, and Obama surveying which military leaders will follow his orders to shoot US civilians that refuse to give up their firearms).
  
  Report this comment
- AvengerK
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 6:33pm
  RABBIDRJERKINS…for clarity’s sake…JERK also believes that Christianity predates teh Jewish faith..so..don’t take his formulations too seriously.
  
  Report this comment
- Bert in NY
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 6:45pm
  She said her job was to make laws the Supreme Court is to interpret them by that logic she could pass a law reinstateting slavery and if the Supreme Court denied it then so be it if they upheld it then oh well. Oh wait that is what they did with Obamacare.
  
  Report this comment
- henryKnox
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 6:51pm
  We are in a lot of trouble because I think these politicians believe their propaganda. What should be asked is why do they think it is prudent for the federal gov’t to disarm citizens that have not committed any crime?
  
  Report this comment
- russianrick
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 7:37pm
  I think I finally found something said by this senator that I can actually agree with. Her comparison of “assault weapons” to child pornography, I think, is somewhat profound.
  
  You see, people have been taking pictures of their kids since the invention of the camera. I believe my mother has a picture of me running around my grandparents house in nothing but a bright blue motorcycle helmet. Is that child pornography?! It actually depends on how the picture is used. If the picture is distributed to perverts or displayed for sexual pleasure, then yes, I would say that it is child pornography. If it is kept by my mother to be used for my own embarrassment and her reminiscing of days long gone, then it is not, and it should be protected by the first amendment.
  
  Similarly we can look at “assault weapons.” If it is kept by a law abiding citizen for protection or enjoyment, there is nothing wrong with it and it should fall under the protection of the second amendment. If it is used by a criminal to hurt people, then it should be taken away from THAT PERSON, just like pictures of naked children are taken away from the people who abuse them. A gun isn’t an assault weapon until it is used to kill people, no matter what the mechanics, and even then, there are times when that is rightfully justifiable under the law.
  
  Report this comment
- Rickfromillinois
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 7:49pm
  Nearly 20 years ago she stated on the show “60 Minutes” that her ultimate goal was to ban ALL firearms. This is just the first step in her plan. All of her talk about how long she has been in public office and on that committee just tells me that she has been in office way too long.
  
  Report this comment
- KliphyR
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 7:49pm
  When she said she wasn’t a sixth grader I would have told her work at it a little harder!
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 7:55pm
  @Jerk
  “communism did come from the Jewish culture, Moses Hess and Karl Marx”
  
  So Karl Marx, who was born into a family that practiced Christianity, is the paradigm of what Jewish culture is? Moreover, why do you never bring up Frederich Engels, Marx’s partner in just about everything? Is it because he’s not Jewish? But wait, how could a non-Jew from a non-Jewish cultural upbringing have helped to author the Communist Manifesto?
  
  Here’s what I notice Jerk. Every major communist in history has either been an atheist or has rejected any traditional religion for a secularized one that better fits them. Every Jew you mention has either been secular, atheist, or, as in your star case of Marx himself, wasn’t even raised Jewish.
  
  Besides, you claim German culture gave birth to Nazism but German culture also has influenced US culture. Through Engels I can argue that German culture created Communism (did I mention that Marx too is a product of German culture). But even though the English language you speak is more closely related to German than to any other language, you never attack American culture for its connection to Germany. You don’t even attack Germany itself. Why is it that Germany can produce something clearly evil (unless your Techengineer) and be forgiven while the Jews are all guilty for all eternity for the actions of a few HUNDRED of their members that you have specifically named?
  
  Report this comment
- bonesiii
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 7:56pm
  “Assault weapons are like child pornography.” So, if a woman is being approached by a rapist, she should whip out child pornography to defend herself instead of an AR-15? Along with pooping her pants?
  
  Great.
  
  Keep saying this stuff, democs. You’re showing the world who you REALLY are.
  
  Report this comment
- Sparky101
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 7:57pm
  She told the truth when she said “I’m Not a 6th Grader.” That’s because she never made it out of the 5th grade. So no, she never was a 6th grader. But then she lied about how long she’s been in the Senate. No one that looks as ancient as her has only been there for 20 years.
  
  Report this comment
- iamheretoparty
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 7:58pm
  Ted Cruz, as a graduate of Harvard Law School and former Law Clerk for CJ Rehnquist, should have known better than to ask a silly question like this. Of course, the government can ban certain books (child pornography), or allow searches of certain areas (cars), or ban certain guns. Society would not function if all the rights in the Constitution were absolute. It was a specious argument made to win political points. Fortunately it blew up in his face. Unfortunately, Ted Cruz isn’t the only politician, Republican or Democrat, who twists the law to fit his or her agenda.
  
  Report this comment
- DIR
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 7:59pm
  @CAVALLO
  
  On the basis of your insightfull responses, It is safe to say Dianne is without a doubt acting unconstitutionally (not in her openions, but in her actions as a representative to ban guns) Stupidity and/or insanity aren’t a defense to her actions, they would only be excuses. They don’t change the illegality of her actions. Dianne needs to be recalled. It’s about time the lawless actions of our representatives are challenged.
  
  Report this comment
- old construction worker
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 8:02pm
  Sen. Feinstein -“Assault weapons” are kind of like child pornography. She argued that although we have a First Amendment right to free speech, that doesn’t mean child pornography is protected by the Constitution.
  
  My Answer- Sen. Feistein you are absolutely right child pornography is illegal but saying child pornography is not. That’s the different Senator Feistein.
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 8:03pm
  @Tech
  It seems you have lost that bet. It would appear that the lead suspect is Leahy, an Irish Catholic. Just goes to show you that despite all your “facts” you still can’t accurately predict who’s a communist.
  
  I’ll also have to call you out on your correlation comment. There simply is nothing to suggest that 90% of Jews are communists like you suggested. In fact, the majority of Jews I’ve met and spoken to associate Communism with Stalin, who persecuted Jews by the thousands. Russian Jews in particular, many having experienced Communism first hand, are often some of the strongest critics of Communism there are.
  
  Personally, I find it contradictory that you can justify 51% of Americans voting Democrat as being a symptom of widespread ignorance but simultaneously refusing to admit that any non-white ethnic group could be voting Democrat due to ignorance.
  
  Report this comment
- piper60
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 8:30pm
  Apparently dome Dems think the Bill of Rights can be swept away if only they sneer hard enough. No wonder they want a gun grab. Tyrants can
  t be comfortable trying to rulea people who can shoot back.
  
  Report this comment
- michaelmoron
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 8:53pm
  I am coming to the defense of TECHENGINEER11
  
  I am not saying 90% of Jews are International Bankster POSs.
  
  Some Jews are innocuous. My grandfather was Jewish and was a Freemason.
  He knew very famous people and became a millionaire 50 years ago.
  
  What I will say, is that 90% of the International Bankster Cartel are Jewish POSs.
  
  They want to rule the World.
  
  I don’t care what ethnicity my “owners” are.
  
  Live free or die !!!
  
  Report this comment
- techengineer11
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 9:02pm
  tzionPosted on March 14, 2013 at 8:03pm
  
  Stop your nonsense.. Whether or not Stalin was Jewish makes no difference.. Most say he was not some say he was.. Regardless him killing and persecuting Jews has nothing to do with his ethnicity.. that is absurd.
  
  Even Winston Churchill freely admitted that the Bolshevik movement was almost entirely ahteistic Jews.. Why do you continue to try and deceive the people over this matter tzion? I think they should all know and understand the Jewish proclivity to communism.
  
  Your 3rd para made little sense.. I think if 30% of the white population America votes D then that’s just stupidity but when 75-95% of a population starts voting for one party then it’s some cultural.
  
  tzion if Leahy not already one of the klan I’m going to let your boys have him. y’all deserve one another.
  
  Out of curiosity tzion would you support any country for the caucasian race? or do we have to all be mixed?
  I think Israel has a right to be Jewish you know and China chinese, korea koreans, etc but I see no place for caucasians? Do you tzion?
  
  Report this comment
- 1947
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 9:10pm
  She’s been there to LONG….OLD mind Gray hair
  
  Report this comment
- fastgen1
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 9:35pm
  Here is the deal, they are all afraid that they have mucked things up so bad, that they are now targets and she might get shot. If she gets rid of all the guns, she can do anything she wants…..
  
  Report this comment
- SendTheMeteors
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 9:38pm
  Hey Ghost, that’s your website? Pretty snarky email to Feinstein. I’m with you, I want no restrictions on my God and Constitutional right to keep and bear arms, including chemicals and biological arms, like anthrax and Sarim (sp on purpose) gas. Where your anarchist ideas go astray is that the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution, not you. You claim to love the Constitution, just not the functional part about the judicial branch. You know, those legislators who can under the Constitution limit gun sales. Here’s Scalia’s comments on Heller:
  
  “Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. [United States v.] Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.”
  
  Hey, why can’t I own a sawed off shotgun or ricin? I will not comply!
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 9:48pm
  @Ghost, Nice letter. I’m sure Patriot Do Not Comply will be included in the Southern Poverty Law Center’s list next time around, but you forgot “Bolshevik douche bag”… Ha!
  
  Report this comment
- techengineer11
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 10:19pm
  SendTheMeteors: You may use all of the silly arguments you like to support your point but the intent of the 2nd amendment was to protect the citizens from abuses and tyranny from their gov’t because the Founders knew it would come.. You realize that the desire of many was to crown Washington as King right?
  
  America is an experiment in freedom and liberty you fool! Quit with all of your silly arguments and use some of that common sense to help us maintain the freedoms and liberties we’ve been granted instead of rallying to one silly liberal position after another.
  
  Throw the words Democrat republican marxist socialist progressive anarcharist all out the window.. In the end it’s a scale between little or no gov’t to much and centralized gov’t.
  
  I’m of the mind to keep it as small and local as possible. Why not join.
  
  Report this comment
- michaelmoron
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 10:45pm
  @Send in the mediocre.
  
  Why would I care if you had serin gas, ricin or a sawed off shot gun ?
  
  I don’t give a crap what you own. I only care if you violate my rights with them,
  
  If you are a suicidal psychotic (Thats debatable), you could find a hundred ways to kill off a large number of people or an individual.
  
  1) Poison in a cafeteria
  2) a Bomb
  3) A 80 mph vehicle on a sidewalk during a large event
  4) A private plane full of gas into a sporting event.
  5) Sinking a ship with a lot of people on board.
  6) illegally (or legally) obtained guns.
  7) A machete in crowded place.
  8) Poison into a water supply
  
  I could go on….
  
  My point is, if you have a proclivity to murder, you will find a way.
  
  What is the differece between getting shot with a shot gun as opposed to a sawed-off shotgun ?
  Both are lethal.
  
  What is the difference between getting poisoned by ricin or stricnine?
  Both are lethal.
  
  Those points, like most of your points, are moot.
  
  The largest school massacre was the result of a Bomb.
  
  I know…. you don’t like the facts.
  
  Report this comment
- AMERICA4EVER
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 11:03pm
  May I add she is a feminist cow.
  
  Report this comment
- AMERICA4EVER
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 11:06pm
  Her argument using porn doesn’t hold water. Porn is photos not a written word. She is the perfect reason for term limits.
  
  Report this comment
- chickenhead2
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 11:09pm
  This one statement from Thomas Jefferson says it all.
  ‘”The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is— as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government”
  Thomas Jefferson also wrote “The tree of Liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants—Resistants to tyrants is obedience to God.”
  
  Report this comment
- SendTheMeteors
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 11:25pm
  techengineer11, excuse me for supporting the Constitution of the United States of America and our form of government. Why do you hate the Constitution? Why do you believe the Supreme Court has no right to interpret the Constitution, despite their Constitutional obligation to do so? Why do you think you are a law unto yourself, and have no obligation to live by the principals of our Founding Fathers?
  
  techengineer11, evidently you don’t believe in our form of government, nor the rule of law. And you mock me for believing in our Constitutional government? Try living in another country for awhile. You may gain some appreciation of the United States. Where in your education did you miss the concept that a group of people must abide by principals for the common good as set forth in our country by the framers of the Constitution or our country, or devolve into anarchy?
  
  Are you a communist or an anarchist? If you hate this country, the Constitution and hate the idea that American supports the common good, why don’t you go live in North Korea? Or Canada?
  
  Report this comment
- SendTheMeteors
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 11:39pm
  Moron, if I understand your logic, you’re saying that there is no point in having laws. Any law can be violated by a person if he so chooses. So what is the point in having laws? Any laws.
  
  Is that what you’re saying?
  
  Report this comment
- Ramerz
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 11:40pm
  Unfortunately we in California are faces with a Democrat super majority. They will strip the citizens with whatever rights they feel need stripping. Please say prayers for those of us in California as we will all soon be slaves, and the state will be bankrupt. Businesses are leaving the state at record numbers as are the Jobs. We still have over 10% unemployment and it is a direct result of how the Public Employee’s Unions have such a hold on the State Legislators.
  
  Report this comment
- termyt
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 12:09am
  Meteor,
  The Court’s responsibility to interpret law is not infallible. If the Court chooses to side with a Tyrant, we do not have to agree. Luckily, the Constitution is written in English, a language we all presumably understand.
  
  That restrictions on the 2nd Amendment are popular or accepted or ruled “Constitutional” by the Court still does not erase the fact that they are illegal. You can not simply reason away and refine “shall not be infringed” to mean “it’s OK to infringe.”
  
  It was mentioned that no right is absolute, and that is true. We understand that our rights are only ensured if we ensure those rights for everyone. So my rights are infringed only so that I can not infringe the rights of another.
  
  For the Child Porn example, child porn victimizes the child forced into sexual acts, infringing on that child’s rights. Therefore, child porn can be infringed. My guns have not killed anyone, nor are they likely to do so. My having an AR-15 infringes no one’s rights. Therefore, my right to own it cannot be infringed.
  
  This is the most basic of our theory and principles of governance. If there are reasonable restrictions on owning firearms, so be it. To make those restrictions legal, all you need to do is convince the President, 2/3 of Congress, and 3/4 of the States to amend the Constitution. Any other method of subverting the Constitution is illegal regardless of how popular or reasonable it is.
  
  Report this comment
- michaelmoron
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 12:15am
  @Sendinthemeteors
  
  I am not an anarchist.
  
  I believe in common sense laws.
  
  Our Country was founded on english common law. Basically, you could do anything you want as long as you didn’t infringe on the rights of another person.
  
  Speeding wrecklessly is infringing on the safety of others, therefore I believe in laws such as a speed limit, stopping at a red light, etc.
  
  Theft, Assault, Murder, Rape, Trespass, Breach of Contract and such, are are crimes.
  
  Those are things that involve violating another person’s rights, and require laws.
  
  I don’t Believe in laws mandating a purchase of something, unapportioned taxes, how much soda I can drink, jaywalking, riding a bike without a light at night, etc.
  
  Those are victimless “crimes” and Infractions.
  
  Report this comment
- carlschulz
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 12:17am
  @ GhostOfJefferson
  “I hate when my bullets implode. It’s even worse when they cross a trans-dimensional warp hole and vector into an alternate quantum reality.”
  I know what you mean. Red matter didn’t destroy Vulcan, it was an assault weapon with imploding bullets.
  
  Report this comment
- michaelmoron
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 12:26am
  @TERMYT
  
  Excellent post.
  
  Report this comment
- jeffersonian1776
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 12:40am
  Hey SendtheMeteors, you said this in reply to GhostofJefferson: “Where your anarchist ideas go astray is that the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution, not you.” I don’t know where you got such a major misconception from. The Supreme Court DOES NOT INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION. They interpret the law as to whether said law is constitutional or not. Trust me, it was not the Founder’s intent to create a branch of the federal government that decides its own legitimacy, let alone what rights are to be handed down to us “people.” There is no grosser misconception in the history of public education. The Constitution says what it says, it can be changed legislatively; such power is not in the hands of the executive or the judicial branch–if it were, we would have no need whatsoever for the entire Congress. Does any of this make sense to you, or does it go beyond your ability to comprehend? If I’m wrong, show me where I have thunk incorrect please.
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 1:13am
  @Tech
  “Whether or not Stalin was Jewish makes no difference.. Most say he was not some say he was.. Regardless him killing and persecuting Jews has nothing to do with his ethnicity.. that is absurd. ”
  
  I didn’t bring up his ethnicity. What I said was is that the oppressive nature of Stalin’s regime towards Jews in particular hasn’t been forgotten, particularly among Russian Jewish immigrants.
  
  As for your whole “Caucasian state” non-issue, I really don’t see what your complaining about. For one, Caucasian is a very general term that refers to a large number of groups. Technically speaking, even I fit the very loose definition of Caucasian. Secondly, not one country that you named is even close to being 100% purely of any one race, ethnicity, or even culture. In China alone there are multiple NATIVE languages. Same goes for India. Moreover, there would seem to be quite a number of countries where whites are predominant so why do you need another? Lastly, on what grounds do you think a Caucasian state is even necessary? When the Zionist Jews asked for a state it was because they had been a persecuted minority for centuries and they believed that there culture would die out if nothing changed. The Caucasian group isn’t even a single race let alone a single culture so that argument cannot apply.
  
  Report this comment
- tonykeywest55
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:22am
  she certainly reasons like a 6th grader. to make child porn a crime is committed. and a child is harmed. there is no crime or harm done by lawful citizens purchacing and owning different kinds of weapons.
  
  Report this comment
- Trigus
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:47am
  I see before me 90 million plus legal Firearms Owners, the Largest Standing Army in the World. I do not see color when I look out upon the masses. I see Americans!!! I see my Brothers and Sisters United to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
  
  Far to long the Giant has been Asleep. Far to long the Rights of Americans have been trampled upon. Far to long the Sacrifices of our Forefathers, and our Family have been Trampled upon. I ask thee, Who will Stand and take the Oath? Who will stand and defend the Freedoms we enjoy today?
  
  These American traitors must understand that they must not trifle with the Rights of the American People. Yes, these American Traitors know we are not like Bill Ayers, or any of the other liberal Leftist. So, they believe they can walk all over us.
  
  No more will we sit on the side lines, no more will we not get out to vote, no more will we support Anti American States, or Business in these States with our hard earned money, and No More will we Roll over and Cave in.
  
  Wy do you think this administration pushes hate so hard? A Divided Country is Easier to Control then a United Country. United We Stand and Divided We Fail!!
  
  IOnly you can make this Once Great Nation, Great Again. People came to America to escape oppression, to have Freedom of Speech, to have Freedom of Religion, and the Right to Bear Arms to Defend Themselves, their Family, their Property, and the Constitution.
  
  Report this comment
- NatalieL
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 4:30am
  My Response: — Maybe you, “Senator Feinstein” should be focusing more on “child pornography” and the molestation of innocent children first, before attempting to work your ideology further into our free society. As far more children’s lives have been destroyed by this, than any lunatic with a gun! As your logic goes, all the pornography should be scooped up by the federal government too, not just the”Kiddie Porn” Guns don’t kill, people do! But any kind of porn can and does stimulate the appetite of these perverts, encouraging them to commit their vile acts! Taking away our Constitutional Right’s, as law abiding citizens, to arm ourselves against all of the the above very real dangers, such as “pedophiles, lunatics and intruders,” isn’t going to solve a thing. IN fact, you’re sure to make it worse! And you don’t have to be a scholar to see that, Senator Feinstein. I ardently couldn’t disagree with you more.
  
  Report this comment
- spikebu
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 4:43am
  Hey, Jerk. Enough with the antisemitism! Put away your cone head and torch. Let’s start some crap about Germans. They are petty. They don’t learn from experience. They are very hairy and they have a lot of moles. They are easily swayed. They have a “group think” mentality. They’re okay with watching while innocent people get slaughtered. They are good at watching other people die, as long as it’s not them or their people. Happy now, Jerk? Israeli’s offended you how?
  
  Report this comment
- rambosharley
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 6:25am
  FrankenFeinstein’s face was dripping with contempt, and wrinkles. You can tell by the snide remarks they, the far-left, have for Ted Cruz……… You know they want to scream “how dare you talk to me, you’re new, you just got here, how dare you ask me a question”! Keep up the good work Senator Cruz…you keep those gun grabbing marxist on the run!
  
  Report this comment
- naughtycal
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 7:25am
  Actually Feinstien is wrong even in her child porngraphy example. If an artist paint a picture that would be considered child porn it is protected. Actual pictures of child be abused is not because a child was abused to make them. If shooting people was part of the process to make a capcity carbine weapon then her example would make at lease some sense.
  
  Report this comment
- ambrosia
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 8:38am
  “I’m not a sixth grader,” Frankenfienstein responded.
  
  You’re NOT Betty Crocker either
  but you SURE do look like her
  with that outdated hairdo-
  for cryin’ out loud,
  even the original Betty Crocker was updated now & then !
  
  The ever so condescending
  Frankenfienstein, BowWow Boxer & Bela Pelosi
  are ALWAYS chewing their cud & whining like mountain goats
  when their judgement is in question,
  as if it’s because they are females….not as if they are crazy, power matrons.
  
  Time for all of them to GO-
  they are as stubborn & inept as the old fuddy-duddies in office.
  Bring on
  the more reasonable, patriotic, easier on-the-eyes, ears & constitutional heart-
  it’s TIME for Sarah to take center stage again
  & send these old girly-goats out to graze !
  
  Report this comment
- Proverbs17-12NLT
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 9:45am
  Your right Diane, your dumber than a 5th grader.
  
  Report this comment
- bafdjack
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 10:38am
  The kindergarten rule; when one misbehaves, punish all by taking away given rights of All. 6th grade? She was a slow learner.
  
  Report this comment
- SendTheMeteors
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 11:11am
  jeffersonian1776, your post is, I guess beyond my ability to comprehend. Either that or it’s simply nonsense.
  
  “EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW”-These words, written above the main entrance to the Supreme Court Building, express the ultimate responsibility of the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court is the highest tribunal in the Nation for all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States. As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution.”
  
  http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/constitutional.aspx
  
  When somebody argues that “the Supreme Court doesn’t interpret the Constitution” you have to assume they either don’t understand the English language or they don’t understand our form of government.
  
  Report this comment
- Swalker
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 11:21am
  truth is beginning to flow We need more of it.
  
  http://justrightofleft.blogspot.de/2013/03/the-jewish-agenda-churchill-was-right.html
  
  Report this comment
- Yeah_Buddy
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 12:07pm
  What kind of idiot votes for people like Fienstain? Libers and mexicans? Thank you so much! I’d rather vote for a 6th grader. Only hope is she retires or skis into a tree asap
  
  Report this comment
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 2:58pm
  @JZS
  
  Yes, that is my website, and yes, that is a snarky letter to her, as she’s earned it. You have no concept of individual rights and liberty, so I don’t expect you to understand. Do know however that if the government comes for actual individual rights that you might still subscribe to, that I will defend you with equal vigor. I don’t pick and choose what rights others get to exercise, even if you and people like you think you can do so on my behalf.
  
  The rest of your post is nonsense and I’ve already instructed you that there will be no debate nor discussion on this topic with you. If you wish to accord yourself as a reasonable human being and engage that mind of yours for something other than ridicule, we can talk. Otherwise, I don’t have time for your devolution in the support of a philosophy of slavery.
  
  Report this comment
- epepep
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 4:10pm
  By Feinstein’s logic, if you have been a bigotted racist for 20 years, that makes racism OK.
  
  The fact is that Feinstein has been WRONG for 20 years. I luv Ted Cruz and Rand Paul. They are the new blood “young guns” the Republican party has been sorely lacking for years. Time to get rid of old worn out McCain and weakling Lindsey Graham.
  
  Report this comment
- techengineer11
  Posted on March 16, 2013 at 9:36am
  tzion
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 1:13am
  @Tech
  
  You make some very good pts. I really don’t have the time to get into the minutia with you.
  
  I’ll just add so what if Stalin killed Jews? He killed exponentially more Christians.
  
  My point about the races and I’m sure you already know what I meant was that Caucasian people had already divided the nations into their own spheres of influence. They set up borders in which their cultures thrived. It was when they brought in the Jews that the borders came down and the calls for multiculturalism and diversity begin to ring out.
  
  My people are already persecuted. And as we lose our majority it will get much worse. Look toward SA for an example. We do not want to become a minority among hordes of brown people.
  I’m not even going to try to get into racial theory with you.. I’m sure you understand because you could just look at your Israel example and see that it applies to other races as well but you don’t care about us.. You overlook our plight because we are unimportant. When 10s of thousands of my people are slaughtered every year that’s ok with you.. No big deal.
  
  Why don’t you open your eyes and show some compassion towards my people?? Or are we just animals in your eyes? Cattle? Is that what you’ve been taught?
  
  Report this comment
- techengineer11
  Posted on March 16, 2013 at 9:42am
  SendTheMeteors
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 11:25pm
  techengineer11, excuse me for supporting the Constitution of the United States of America and our form of government
  
  I do revere the Constitution and I understand the role of the Supreme Court. It is 1 of 3 supposedly equal branches. It’s entitled to interpret the Constitution but it is not etitled to its own facts. In the beginning the SC was by far the weakest of the 3 branches.. The Constitution needed no interpreations because it was well understood.
  
  Again the 2nd amendment is not up for debate. And as we all know the SC today is completely a political tool.
  
  In reality the debate is useless. this enitre gov’t has failed.. There’s nothing that will put it back togehter again.
  
  We are headed towards a Reign of Terror.. No question.
  
  Report this comment
Master.Debater
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:42pm
Don’t lecture me on the Constitution. I’ve had a lot of experience trampling on it for the last 20 years.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- SLAPTHELEFT
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:49pm
  I didnt hear a lecture. I heard simple questions being asked. Why couldnt she answer?
  
  Typical liberal/progressive.
  
  Report this comment
- SendTheMeteors
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:55pm
  Cruz is being cute. Actually there are lots of “reasonable” limitations on the First Amendment (yelling “fire” in a theater etc.). And there are already plenty of reasonable limits on the Second Amendment as well.
- AlansTigg
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:02pm
  pretty much sums it up
  
  Report this comment
- The-Monk
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:03pm
  Howdy Send The JZS,
  
  Exactly… that’s why we don’t need any more restrictions.
  
  Glad to see we agree on something. : )
  
  Report this comment
- TSUNAMI_22
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:07pm
  @ SendTheMeteors
  
  Cruz made his point, and millions will see it and understand the dire implications it holds. That’s what’s important.
  
  She lost that debate in two ways: She lost it when she defended herself by trying to evoke the emotional response of being treated like a 6th grader and failed, and then she nailed her coffin shut completely when she finally answered the obvious “NO” to Cruz’s question and proved to the world that her “ban” doesn’t hold water.
  
  Report this comment
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:08pm
  Hey there MEAT/JZS, Frankly, I can see some up and coming entrepreneur coming up with the new Dianne Feinstein urinal target. Worked well for Jane Fonda. Used to see those all over a number of military installations back in the day.
  
  Report this comment
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:09pm
  Hi MONK, picked up on what you wanted me to read. Will get to it once I settle down to eat lunch. Many thanks.
  
  Report this comment
- mikem1969
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:13pm
  I loved her statement “I am not a 6th grader”. Most 6th graders have more sense then she does anyway.
  
  My guns will only leave my cold dead hands.
  
  Resist tyranny loudly.
  
  Report this comment
- Displacedsoutherner
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:14pm
  Meteors, I think we already have more than sufficient “reasonable” limitations on the 2nd Amendment; many of the more useful ones aren’t enforced and felons and those deemed mentally deficient continue to have guns.
  
  Will re-criminalizing criminal behavior make it so super-criminal that criminals will give up their felonious ways and obey the law? That seems to be one intent of the Left’s plan while all it really does is penalize law-abiding citizens for the acts of others.
  
  “Sorry, Mr Meteor, your new car is governed to 45 MPH because some scoff-laws refuse to obey the 70 MPH speed limit and we aren’t taking any chances on you. And, no, I don’t give a crap about your perfect driving record.”
  
  Report this comment
- RIDEMODELS
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:15pm
  So let me get this straight. Miss Finklestein says it is ok for a woman to fight for the Constitution in a foreign war with a gun in her hand and on the front lines, but when that same woman comes back here to the good ole USA, she cannot own a gun to protect herself or her family….interesting….interesting.
  
  So now in the great state of Caliponia where porn is produced more than anywhere else in the country and women are paid for Rape type situations, then those women cannot own a gun in case they might be raped because men think that is what they want. And lets not forget that children are fed semen in some Calipornia schools.
  
  The Liberal movie stars who are ruling the middle and lower class there are the ones who will have fully Armed Protection when they would like to be in public because they made a movie that glorify guns. If I were the typical black living in Calipornia then I would be terrified of what my screwed up state is doing to me and if it feels like you are being oppressed, you are being oppressed and you can blame the president as well. Hopefully we can get a bunch of conservatives in the Whitehouse, who believe in the Bill of Rights and the 2nd amendment. Until then it looks like they are steadfast on taking away more more of the rights of “We the People”……
  
  We need more Bill of Rights loving people in the White-house, not liberal idiots who love Hollywood more than the people of America…!!
  
  Thank you BLAZE….!!!
  
  Report this comment
- Skeeterhawk
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:15pm
  meteor
  Perhaps your fire in a theater analogy says it best. It came from one of the broadest censorship decisions (later overturned) ever brought down by the Supreme Court. The case, U.S. v. Schenck, was about espionage and wrongfully jailed peaceful, anti war activists and protesters. So you were close but in this case it would be peaceful, law abiding citizens sent to jail for possessing these vile, scary “assault weapons.”
  So I guess you would err on the side of restriction of liberty? Is that what you mean to say?
  
  Report this comment
- TX_Ag_Engineer
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:16pm
  It’s so much fun to watch these folks implode when they are met with logic. This is such a typical response; she should have called him a “poopy head” while she was at it.
  
  Report this comment
- AvengerK
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:18pm
  Really JZS/MEETEEYORES?
  Can you explain the cuteness of Feinstein and her “imploding” bullets?
  
  Report this comment
- STREBOR
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:19pm
  Meteors: When I yell “fire” I am exercising my second amendment right. AND I don’t do it in theatres!
  
  Report this comment
- brother_ed
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:20pm
  @SENDTHEMETEORS
  
  Telling ‘fire’ does not take away my freedom of speech…it only punishes me for using that freedom improperly or innappeopiately.
  
  We have laws against using our ‘arms’ improperly or inappropiately – what she is talking about is completely taking our right away.
  
  Senator Cruz asked a valid question.
  
  Report this comment
- Minarchian
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:21pm
  @ SendTheMeteors
  
  Show me a law that says you can’t yell fire! in a crowded movie theater
  
  Report this comment
- Witness1974
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:29pm
  Ed: excellent response
  
  Report this comment
- SUNTZU
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:31pm
  Frankenstine should be on that TV show
  Are you Dumber than 6th grader.
  
  Report this comment
- TEIN
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:32pm
  @Send/Libby/Progressive Troll…you mean reasonable, like discharging firearm in city limits, only gun ranges, and not shooting bows into the air around crowds people..would that be close to “reasonable” limitations??? Unlike The Feinstein and yourself where the equivalent proposed legislation would be like cutting the tongue out of person who yelled “fire” or whom was deemed “mentally unstable” so that people would not be able to put others in danger…right?? Because you care so much about the security of other that if you could save just 1 person from harm when someone yelled “b-omb” and caused a stampede that people loosing their tongue would be such a small cost to society…
  
  Report this comment
- civilwarcometh
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:32pm
  SENDTHEMETEORS <<<<< Little Alinsky changing the conversation again. To free speech.. Why do people play their game??? Don't play the rules for radicals game. Ignore them….
  
  Report this comment
- spirited
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:32pm
  Use 1st graders’ assainations
  for bragging-rights of 20 years
  while insulting 6th graders
  and Senator Cruise.
  
  >What a pro!
  
  Report this comment
- OldVet
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:32pm
  Senator Cruz was talking like an officer of the law, a lawyer. Senator Feinstein was responding like a sixth grader. Defensive and illiterate.
  
  Report this comment
- The-Monk
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:33pm
  “I’m not a 6th grader”
  
  Monk translation;
  
  Correct….if she had the CAEROGAP of a 6th grader she wouldn’t be doing this cr@p.
  
  Report this comment
- brother_ed
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:37pm
  @WINTNESS1974
  
  Thanks for overlooking the typos…silly smart phones :-/
  
  I’ve read many if your comments on other articles, and I must say you do excellent work!
  
  Report this comment
- RIDEMODELS
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:52pm
  The Constitution gives Hollywood the right to make movies and video games with guns in them……It is Congresses job to uphold the Constitution, they are under oath.
  
  Report this comment
- MDECKER
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:53pm
  The word, “hysteria”, comes to mind when observing the senator from California. She has twenty plus years of never having to answer to anyone, and when confronted on the issue of personal rights, she becomes unhinged. Clearly a case of someone who is ineligible to carry concealed herself or even be around a gun.
  
  Report this comment
- FrankieBaby
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:56pm
  Exactly.
  
  Report this comment
- richauthor
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:16pm
  Outstanding post!
  
  Report this comment
- Zipit
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:25pm
  Meat! How’s this for reasonable?
  
  “Today I swung my front door wide open and placed my Stevens 320 right in the doorway. I gave it 6 shells, and noticing that it had no legs, even placed it in my wheelchair to help it get around. I then left it alone and went about my business. While I was gone, the mailman delivered my mail, the neighbor boy across the street mowed the yard, a girl walked her dog down the street, and quite a few cars stopped at the stop sign right in front of our house. After about an hour, I checked on the gun. It was still sitting there in the wheelchair, right where I had left it. It hadn’t rolled itself outside. It certainly hadn’t killed anyone, even with the numerous opportunities it had been presented to do so. In fact, it hadn’t even loaded itself. Well you can imagine my surprise, what with all the media hype about how dangerous guns are and how they kill people.
  Either the media is wrong, and it’s the misuse of guns by PEOPLE that kills people, or I’m in possession of the laziest gun in the world. Alright, well I’m off to check on my spoons. I hear they’re making people fat.” That was recently e-mailed to me. Not sure where it came from!
  
  Report this comment
- tsx39
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:50pm
  She’s a career politician. Her little foray into her experience is one of the big things that’s wrong with Washington.
  
  As far as restrictions go on the 2nd Amendment, there already are more than enough of them in place. But Feinstein has shown in the past that she doesn’t like the 2nd Amendment, period. She has said she wants to take away all guns (if only she had the votes).
  
  Report this comment
- The Giver
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 3:34pm
  SENDTEMETEORS- you don’t understand that what you call reasonable limitations, many reasonable folks don’t. Just because the two parties have succeeded at limiting our freedoms, doesn’t make it legal. But some folks will “lean forward” for more. One day you might wind up leaving this country because it becomes unbearable even for you. Good luck.
  
  Report this comment
- crofootski
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 3:37pm
  Good one, Master.Debater.
  
  Report this comment
- FEMALL
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 6:07pm
  @ The_Monk I think she was denying having 20K in her backpack or something like that…talk about workplace ‘bullying’ and aggressive behavior. I think Ted needs to file a hostile workplace complaint!
  
  Report this comment
- David-FL
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 7:37pm
  Sendthe-Traitors,
  
  That is BS. Yes, you can not yell fire in a theatre. However, they don’t tape your mouth shut (before) you enter. Man should not be punished for what he (might) do. That is irrational. That is insane.
  
  Of course you and Biden would get along just fine….. (btw, that’s NOT a compliment)
  
  Irrational Collectivists really are the problem!
  
  Report this comment
- old construction worker
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 8:26pm
  Sendthemeteors- Sometime you amaze me. Anybody can go into a theater and yell FIRE. I could, you could or a group of people could. But because of laws we would have to pay a price for our ACTION. IT IS THE ACTION THAT IS ILLEGAL NOT THE WORD “FIRE”. If the use of word FIRE was band that would be a violation of our First Amendment. Just like our Second Amendment right. The action of murder by any type of “arm” (rifle or a baseball bat”) is illegal, not the tool.
  
  Report this comment
- yiska8
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 9:16pm
  “I have great respect for it.”
  So do commies, and fascists, but they don’t live their lives or careers by it. Nor do they find it precious or necessary. She must have studied it in order to pick it apart and allow it to move with the times and wipe her fat ass with it the rest of the time.
  What an old arrogant elitist *itch.
  The only thing liberal progressives love is the sound of their own voice.
  Truth is bitter poison and I do like to think that the new conservatives will keep dishing it out by the ton. It’s high time Feinstein and Friends GRIND their teeth down to their gums out of FEAR AND WORRY in their sleep instead of the average law abiding, Bible believing, gun owing AMERICAN citizen.
  Here, here Ted,Rand,and Marco!!!
  
  Report this comment
- moreoilplease
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 8:51am
  Sendthemetoers
  
  Very good, I see you’re making an argument. Albeit an invalid one. Comparing limitations on speech like yelling fire in a theater to limitations on the second amendment is invalid.
  
  Limiting the type of fire arm, as defined, I can buy because of a crime I may commit or someone else may commit is the same as forbidding me or anyone to use the word “fire” because I might yell it in a crowded theater. Or someone has already yelled fire in a theater. It’s absurd.
  
  My right to own a fire arm does not injure you. No matter the fire arm. You cannot limit my rights under the constitution because of a crime that I may commit much less a crime someone else has already committed. No ambiguity whatsoever.
  
  And don’t waste your time typing extreme, invalid exceptions like you did above with ricin etc. I am not guaranteed the right under the constitution to keep deadly poisons, bombs etc.
  
  I appreciate the effort to make an argument but unfortunately the invalid arguments you made are a s good as it gets for gun control. Emotional and invalid arguments is all there is.
  
  The courts have ruled that felons can be denied at least some rights under the constitution. The right to vote, the right to own a fire arm. I would assume you would not limit a felon’s 2cnd amendment right before he committed the felony? Guilty until proven innocent? Pre-Crime!
  
  Report this comment
- YOURSENSEI
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 9:38am
  Mr or Ms MOILPLEASE.
  
  This is what you must know:
  
  “OK, everybody go through the poison and bomb detector? Good. Everybody bring their bazooka? Good. Fire!”
  
  It is so.
  
  (Albeit? Really? Really?)
  
  Report this comment
- termyt
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 9:47am
  It’s not the word “Fire” that is illegal. Remember, the only valid restriction on rights is if the use of the right infringes on the rights of others. Also, having a right to do this or that does not excuse you from the consequences of exercising it.
  
  Yelling “Fire!” in a crowded theater to cause a panic infringes the rights of those whom you are trying to incite to riot, therefore the right to shout it can be infringed. If someone carries a gun into town, waves it about and threatens to shoot people, then the gunman is infringing rights and can thus be infringed upon.
  
  It takes a little it of discernment to reason through this, but it does not take a Constitutional law degree.
  
  Report this comment
- rp454
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 2:31pm
  @meteors “you cannot yell FIRE in a crowded theater” Incorrect. If there actually is a fire, it is not only my right, but my responsibility to yell FIRE. In this situation I am not causing a false panic in which people would get injured, I am attempting to save lives. Your argument fails the common sense test.
  
  Report this comment
TSUNAMI_22
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:42pm
The purpose of the congress is NOT to “make laws”, Miss Feinstein. The purpose of congress is to uphold the Constitution and to PROTECT the rights that are “self-evident” and guaranteed under it.

By the way, you can’t have my weapons — ever!

Molon Labe, biatch.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- JoeE71
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:04pm
  Well said! Feinstein is no Einstein!
  
  Report this comment
- KevINtampa
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:09pm
  She, and anyone else who wants to, can ban anything they want. Freedom is a choice, always has been, always will be. It 1000 BC, freedom was a choice. In 1000 AD, freedom was a choice. In 2013, freedom is still a choice. Regardless of who triumphs and who loses in these political meanderings, in 2050 freedom will be a choice.
  
  Some choose to be free. Others choose to subject themselves.
  
  So you can ban my guns, but I swear on my own soul that I will die a free man. Hopefully I die a free man at 85 years old, but I will not sacrifice my freedom for longevity. Freedom isn’t the capacity to be able to live to be old, freedom is pursuing your own happiness. So she can go ahead and ban our guns, it’s just too bad she won’t be the one who comes to try and them because it would be good for her to witness how a free man dies.
  
  Report this comment
- Mil-Dot
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:17pm
  KevinTampa,
  Oh no sir. Make no mistake about it. If they come and try and take them ALL politicians will then become legitimate targets of war. And all of those that surround them. They will not sit up on the hill eating caviar looking down upon the carnage. They will be among it.
  
  Report this comment
- Trigus
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:20pm
  I will do it: Here is the question that should be asked in this hearing:
  
  Would Congress vote to ban Automobiles and Alcohol?
  
  If 25,000 parents who lost their children to drunk drivers where paraded in front of Congress and the media with Pictures and those Parents told Stories about their children.
  
  Would Congress not want to ban Automobiles and Alcohol?
  
  Only you can Make this Once Great Nation, Great Again!!!
  
  2013 American Patriot Spring, What will you do?
  
  The distinctions between Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, and Independents are no more. I Am Not A Republican, But An American! – Sons of Liberty
  
  Report this comment
- RIDEMODELS
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:23pm
  If I were a black man living anywhere right now, I would be worried as to what my country is doing to me and my freedoms.
  
  Its not fare that Hollywood liberals have fully Armed Security guards to protect themselves from a society they create, because making a movie filled with guns and violence is so important to them.
  
  This is a typical way that Dimocrats in Washington will want to control the middle or lower class, and this is also how a King is born. The people of Calipornia’s only hope is to try and get someone in office who will trust “We the People” and not the Natzi Regime in Washington.
  
  Here comes the SS……..Those stupid liberal gun movies will never be the same….The bad guys are here and our Bill of Rights are the target..!!
  
  thankyou blaze
  
  Report this comment
- darkknight91
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 4:17pm
  What’s and imploding bullet?
  
  Report this comment
- Wisdom7
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 4:57pm
  “The purpose of the congress is NOT to “make laws”, Miss Feinstein.”
  
  Actually it is…
  
  The Legislative branch, which is Congress, makes law. The Judicial branch determines the constitutionality of said laws. The Executive branch enforces them.
  
  Report this comment
showmerancher
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:41pm
There was a time when the nation was about “We the People…”. Now we are only “the wee people…”

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- michaelmoron
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:48pm
  “Behind the ostensible (Visible) government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of today.”
  
  ― Theodore Roosevelt
  
  Report this comment
- RIDEMODELS
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 9:33pm
  These sniveling cowards like her would never come to take guns…..But she will be the FIRST one to send a woman into a war zone with a gun to shoot her way back out….
  
  Let me repeat…..This sniveling little coward would never come to take guns…..She sends a SUCKER to do her DIRTY work……….Do your job and live by your OATH…….Quit playing games with the Americans who have fought for your right to RUN YOUR FAT MOUTH…!!!
  
  You are an over paid under educated IDIOT and you need to be expelled from Congress..!!
  
  Report this comment
- RIDEMODELS
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 9:37pm
  Democrats like her ran on the fact that Life meant nothing……Abortion was the coolest.
  
  Dems ran on the ability to Abort life and anything they say now is just lies lies lies…..
  
  Impeach……Impeach…….Impeach….!!
  
  Report this comment
Idaho2aa
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:41pm
Where does she come up with this stuff? Assault weapons are like child pornography? That’s almost as bad as her saying that “these weapons were designed to shoot at the hip, if possible.” This is what living in California will do to you.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- maggiepie
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:55pm
  Been out in the sun too long.
  
  Report this comment
- Bullitt2008
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:56pm
  What do expect? Last week she said it’s “legal to hunt humans with 15-round, 30-round, even 150-round magazines.”
  
  Please don’t blame this native Californian. I didn’t vote for her (ever) or her ilk. Can’t wait to move out of this madness when my wife retires. California is GONE.
  
  Report this comment
- westtitus
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:07pm
  She is a perfect example of why we need term limits for Congress and the Senate. They get rich and all of a sudden they are smarter than everyone and think they can do whatever they want to We the People.
  They all need to go if they have over 8 yrs….12 maximum. NO pension, just SSI and no free medical but Obamacare only for these idiots.
  
  Report this comment
- Bullitt2008
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:12pm
  I meant “What do you expect?” Sorry, I was a classmate of Dianne’s in the 6th grade.
  
  Report this comment
- 338lapua
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:58pm
  I loved the “imploding bullets”. You just cannot make this up. THANKS CALIFORNIA!!! I am going to hunt humans with my so called assault weapon and my 400 round magazine full of imploding bullets!!! WAH! Your time has come DIFI, resign quietly.
  
  Report this comment
- Mil-Dot
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 4:50pm
  West,
  Respectfully, there will NEVER be term limits in office. They will NNNNEEEEVVVVEEEERRRR vote affirmatively for a law that keeps them from raping us and enriching themselves. You might as well forget it my friend. It will not happen. There is only one way to get back our country. And you know what it is. There will be no easy road to travel patriot. You might as well acquiesce to that fact and move on.
  
  Report this comment
CapitalismCzar
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:40pm
Funny, Congress is there to make laws huh? Thats all Dems think they are there to do. Ted Cruz is such a breath of fresh air.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RIDEMODELS
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:31pm
  More laws on “We the People”……Who would have guessed the same liberals who make movies about guns guns guns would be out in full force to take guns away from us…..well I guess the black population of calipornia will find out what we have known for years, Gov is not always your best friend when it comes to protecting yourself, oh they will put a gun in your hand to fight in a country that hates us, and they will give you a bronze star for that…..
  
  Just boycott the liberal royalty that is Hollywood…!!
  
  Thank you Blaze…..
  
  Report this comment
- Gonzo
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:39pm
  I like this line from her “Just know I’ve been here for a long time”. Yea Dianne, we know. That’s half the problem with this country. You may not like the Constitution, but it will take a lot more than an angry old cow like you to change it!
  
  Report this comment
SquidVetOhio
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:40pm
Sen. Feinstein, If you don’t want to be treated like a 6th grader…

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- WakingSheep
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:51pm
  I’m betting she wouldn’t make it far on “are you smarter than a 5th grader”.
  
  Report this comment
STREBOR
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:39pm
Stay on her keester Senator Ted. God Bless Texas!
Senator Swinestein is a pig with lipstick! Do what you will with California but leave the rest of this Country be!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Stoic one
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:49pm
  Please do not insult pigs…..they taste SOOoooooo good!
  
  Report this comment
- STREBOR
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:08pm
  For Stoic……Yes indeed hog are tasty; however, we don’t eat the old breeder sows here in Texas. They become fertilizer………
  
  Report this comment
- rp454
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:49pm
  Since Senator Cruz and the old sow are on the same committee, we can only hope he keeps after until she has a stroke or her head explodes.
  
  Report this comment
Rayblue
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:39pm
She was a sixth grader once but it didn’t take.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- SLAPTHELEFT
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:43pm
  The debate is over. the second amendment stands as written. No progressive can change that. Sorry.
  
  The debate is over. the guns won.
  
  Report this comment
- SLAPTHELEFT
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:44pm
  In breaking news- exploding bullets were used at sandy hook and children were dismembered.
  
  Why didnt we hear about this sooner?
  
  Report this comment
- SLAPTHELEFT
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:45pm
  What is an imploding bullet? Please educate me.
  
  Report this comment
- michael48
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:46pm
  in Kali-fornica…6th grade is Phd in stupidology and a professors job at Bezerkley…beyond 6th grade…you’re going backwards…indoctrination thingy…
  
  Report this comment
- HAWKWIND
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:57pm
  SLAP – “imploding” What the ??? I was wondering about that myself. Must be some kind of “assault” bullet…
  
  I gotta get me some!
  
  Report this comment
- mercenary4freedom
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:05pm
  AR prices are slowly coming back down. I saw a few yesterday for under 1K.
  
  Report this comment
- RIDEMODELS
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:48pm
  An imploding bullet is a child pornography bullet…..They are one in the same…..Its all in the same time line as a child porn producer that makes imploding bullets, something a conservative cannot understand.
  
  On another note Feinstien Einstein has had a total recall meltdown…
  
  Just for the record, a pistol can be carried by any teacher who wants to protect school kids……From rapists or killers….
  
  Report this comment
- Attention2Detail
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:02pm
  If she said that she’s seen imploding bullets, then I’m sure she’s seen imploding bullets, but since they don’t exist, that would make her delusional and thus unfit to serve in the Senate.
  
  Report this comment
- SandW
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:05pm
  Rayblue – I read she was actually a six grader three times………
  
  Report this comment
- rp454
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:55pm
  I have the shot all lined up. Beautiful 10 point buck at about 80 yards. I control my breathing… The scope settles on the kill zone… I slowly squeeze the trigger… BOOM!! My 30-06 comes to life in my hands… The shot was perfect! Suddenly I hear an eerie whistling sound followed by a slight pop and then silence. The buck looks calmly at me and wanders off. Damn imploding bullet again!!!! I REALLY hate it when my bullets implode!!!!
  
  Report this comment
Al J Zira
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:38pm
Translation: I could care less what the Constitution says, this is what we progressives want and we’re going to get it come hell or high water. We won’t let the people or the law get in the way neither will facts or reason. If we’re going to take apart the Constitution this is a big step.

We the people need to get off our duffs and start moving on these people. Get them out of office, grass root campaign efforts to get these politicians that seem to have tenure in their seats. Force term limits on them despite the laws they pass benefiting themselves. The list is endless and we are unorganized.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:45pm
  Spot on AL J ZIRA, spot on!
  
  Report this comment
- The-Monk
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:56pm
  Hi RJJ,
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SwNXQMoNps
  
  Report this comment
- republic2011
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:01pm
  In her own words (email she sent me after I asked her to back off the 2nd Amendment): “I recognize that the Second Amendment provides an individual right to bear arms, but I do not believe that right is unlimited or that it precludes taking action to prevent mass shootings.”
  
  Any questions about where she stands?
  
  Report this comment
- civilwarcometh
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:02pm
  Voting does not work anymore….. I bet you think Chitcongo Moohamhead won the election fairly.. It’s not who votes BUT those who count the votes. She admitted voting twice in the presidential election last November, and now, Obama supporter Melowese Richardson has been indicted for allegedly voting at least six times. She also is charged with illegal voting in 2008 and 2011.
  
  The 58-year-old veteran Cincinnati poll worker, indicted Monday, faces eight counts of voter fraud. Two others, one of whom is a nun, have been charged separately.
  
  Report this comment
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:13pm
  Hi MONK, Got it, and will finally sit down long enough to read it all when I take time for lunch.
  
  Report this comment
- Mil-Dot
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:20pm
  Gentleman,
  If you think voting is going to solve the problem, you are delusional. I say this respectfully with many years of political observation under my belt. They will never quit until we make them stop. They are being driven and manipulated by forces outside of the USA. So, do not ever expect term limits or other such nonsense. It will NEVER happen. Get your stuff ready and be prepared. Any small spark will get it going. Especially national insolvency, which is the most probable catalyst.
  
  Report this comment
huey6367
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:38pm
No, you are not a sixth grader. Sixth graders are much smarter than that.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RIDEMODELS
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:40pm
  Feinstein is no Einstein……Some great man said that.
  
  She was hired to uphold the Constitution…..Its her JOB.
  
  Making stupid MOVIES is Hollywoods JOB..!!
  
  Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:38pm
Diane you aren’t smarter than a fifth grader and you know nothing of our constitutional rights,you’re in the business,twenty years too long I might add,of destroying our constitutional rights you progressive POS. Retire already haven’t you done enough damage?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:45pm
  PROGRESSIVESLAYER, LOL, Bud, that is what was going through my mind the moment I heard her say that.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:56pm
  I still want the ***** to answer why, if she thinks all vets have PTSD, isn’t she doing anything about all the claims being denied. Crack hos with 15 kids get free food, housing, and college… Veterans get their rights taken away and now their tuition assistance.
  
  Report this comment
- progressiveslayer
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:07pm
  Just Yeah the prog POS can’t resign fast enough for me but she’ll resign when hell freezes over.
  Government needs to stay out of our business and stop trying to destroy all our rights,I’m sick of those vermin. Diane doesn’t care about vets she only cares about how much money she can extract from working people to pay for worthless slugs to sit on their fat @sses all day and get drunk and high.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:12pm
  @progslayer, On the flip side, I’m REALLY starting to like Cruz. We don’t have a lot of votes to make sure he’s really one of us, but man he’s letting the establishment have it. Fingers crossed he’s not another poser.
  
  Report this comment
- booger71
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:14pm
  She has studied the Constitution for twenty years, and still does not know what it says.
  
  Report this comment
- progressiveslayer
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:17pm
  Just I hear ya we need more votes from him to see where he stands but from what I’ve seen he looks promising,time will tell.
  
  Report this comment
- momrules
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:35pm
  Progressiveslayer……….They have been working on gun control/ban for years and just like Obamacare/socialized medicine finally happened after decades of effort so will a gun ban. A gun ban WILL happen and with Obama in office now seems to be their time.
  
  My question is how do you or any of you guys think they can accomplish this? Confiscation will not work as there are too many willing to fight back against such a tactic. Laws requiring us to turn in our guns will not work because people would ignore the law.
  
  They might imprison or kill many but the rest are willing and ready to fight back.
  
  How will they control millions of gun owning, freedom loving Americans? I keep turning that question over in my mind and have a few ideas but am curious what others might think.
  
  Report this comment
- mercenary4freedom
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:02pm
  JUSTANGRY, because veterans swore an oath to the constitution and take it very seriously. Veterans know how to fight, organize, use common sense & love their country. If the balloon ever went up and the fight ensued against tyrannical govt she knows in the end her and her ilk would be overrun. So label them all crazy and disallow them to have firearms. make them all look bad so it makes it harder for them become leaders in the community & future govt.
  
  The crack ho’s will go along with anything just to get their money.
  
  Report this comment
- progressiveslayer
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:15pm
  Momrules They won’t go the confiscation route but they’ll force banks to not do business with firearms manufacturers and they’ll continue to buy ammo by the ton. I can see the progs inflicting heavy taxes on guns and ammo and they’ll work every angle they can think of to infringe on our right to bear arms. For now all we can do is try to make sure elected officials adhere to the constitution and when they don’t vote them out of office. The war on our constitution has been waged by these filthy progs for over a century and we must stay vigilant and never surrender any of our rights to these anti-American anti-freedom vermin.
  
  Report this comment
BetsyRoss1513
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:37pm
At least a 6th grader can understand the 2nd amendment.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:37pm
No, madam; you’re not a 6th grader. But someday, with God’s help you will attain that education apex.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- justangry
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:52pm
  How’s going out in CO, Tron? Thought about you the other day being in the thick of it. Are you still thinking “from my cold dead hands”? Any resistance, we’re not hearing nationally?
  
  Report this comment
- Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 2:55pm
  Hey Tron:
  Even Jethro in the Beverly Hillbillies gradiated the 6th grade.
  
  Report this comment
ltb
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:36pm
Senator Cruz used an excellent analogy, which went right over Feinstein’s head. Of course, in true liberal fascist pig form, Feinstein reacted with indignation, instead of responding to Senator Cruz’s very valid point.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- TEXASGRANNY73
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:24pm
  Definitely he got her. No doubt about it. Article says she apologized to him later so she knows we know. Reminded me of when Barbara Boxer said “I worked hard to get here” to a General who called her ma’am. I’m a thinking Senator Ted Cruz is going to be upsetting a lot of the “privileged I’ve been here 20,30,40 years apple carts” She also seemed to mimic Hillary as well with the it doesn’t matter anyway frame of mind.
  
  Report this comment
Zipit
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:35pm
“I’m not a sixth grader,” said responded. While she didn’t directly answer his question, she did address the problem with out even knowing it when she said,”I’ve been on this committee for 20 years”!!!!! Yup that’s the problem!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
RAGEAGAINSTTHEMACHINE
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:35pm
Thank you, Senator Cruz, for having the audacity to question this Marxist Fossil (I AM being nice)! As she readily admits, she’s been around FAR too long and is incapable of rational thought or upholding her Oath of Office. Do you hear her CALIFORNIA?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- pantokrator
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 6:26pm
  She attempted to belittle Ted, by reminding him how long she’s been in Congress, hoping that fact would automatically presume she is above him in all ways, but she only proves how ignorant and childish she really is on these issues. Ted was taking her argument apart, and she knew she had to silence him somehow. What better way then to tout about your career in politics?
  
  I felt sorry for Cruz as much as I gained more respect for his fearlessness. He is surrounded by politicians who do not represent the people, but represent a specific set of ideas that gain them political and financial advantages. I literally felt like Ted was the ONLY one in that room who was thinking about the safety, the liberties and freedoms of we, the people.
  
  Report this comment
AlansTigg
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:34pm
wonder where she saw the imploding bullets….wish her arrogance would implode

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- -hh
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 4:51pm
  ‘Imploding’ bullets are a fiction, just like much of her alleged argument. It is made even more of a farce by the fact that the authorities were eventually compelled to report that none of those kids were killed with any sort of ‘Assault Rifle’ at all (it was left behind in the car).
  
  Now if our representatives really want to argue that the Bill of Rights is fixed in 18th century technologies, then her Congressional Franking privleges are limited to mail that’s delivered by horse…and no use of email or laser printers either: it must be quill and ink, or a Gutenberg press…oh, and she also loses her right to vote, being a female too.
  
  Now this doesn’t mean that there aren’t some legitimate issues to discuss, but to propose additional burdens on the law-abiding citizens in our Society is diametrically in the wrong direction.
  
  Report this comment
- CPT_GCF
  Posted on March 15, 2013 at 9:33am
  I was thinking the same thing. I’ve never seen imploding bullets. I’ve seen expanding bullets, but not imploding. She clearly is ignorant.
  
  Report this comment
rickroland
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:34pm
Yeah, Diane is not a sixth grader, but that’s not the issue.

The issue is that *any* sixth grader within a 20 block area of Diane, could run intellectual circles around her.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
chips1
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:33pm
He might have got her dander up, but unfortunately, it was on the tops of her shoes.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Ash_Kiker
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 3:06pm
  Dander? I thought they said Dandruff… thought she was shedding her skin all over the floor, crusty old crow
  
  Report this comment
dustbunnieskill
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:33pm
Good answer, I know better cause i have been here 20yrs? that explains why she should not be were she is at. Stagnate, blinders on, narrow minded, Fool Speed Ahead!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- In the O.C.
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:45pm
  Yes, she’s been a Senator in California for 20 years and that’s the problem. We have a lot of those here in California. We’re run by the Left – all of them. And look where we are today. Disgusting. She’s entrenched, she knows it, and that’s why she refused to debate Elisabeth Emken in the last campaign/election in California. All those illegals, voting surreptiously, waiting for the California hand-out. Hey, folks, IT’S ALL FREEEEEEEEEEEE in California. Not.
  
  Report this comment
banjarmon
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:33pm
Feinstein…YOU are Not an OATH KEEPER!! I hereby call for you to RESIGN from the office you disgrace!!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
huey6367
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:32pm
What is an assault weapon Sen. Feinstein?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
midnightsun
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:29pm
She is one ugly, old, unhappy hag!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Witness1974
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:09pm
  I loved the way he kept calling her the “senior senator from California.”
  
  Report this comment
- dshevlin
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 5:42pm
  Name me one demorat commie that isn’t as ugly as sin. LOL.. great point! Evil is ugly on surface & beneath. Can’t hide it. Her eyes are so blood shot – did anyone get a pee test on her lately?
  
  Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:28pm
They HATE the Constitution. They are traitors to this country. Notice DICK D. said our rights are NOT ABSOLUTE… What is the penalty for TREASON???

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- civilwarcometh
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:36pm
  The Senate Judiciary Committee has approved a hugely controversial ban on assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition clips, but the measure faces nearly certain defeat on the Senate floor.
  
  The proposal, authored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), bans 157 different models of assault weapons, as well as magazines containing more than 10 bullets.
  
  The vote was 10 to 8, with all Democrats supporting it and all Republicans opposed.
  
  “There are plenty of weapons out there,” Feinstein said during Thursday’s hearing. “The whole point of this bill is to reduce over time the supply, purchase and transfer of military type weapons.”
  
  Report this comment
- ...sam
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:42pm
  The Senate wont go for it…..cuz they are a pile of freedom grabbin libs….Obamma ought to be thankfull of them…Starts in the House but without the Senate you are up a rope.
  
  Report this comment
- scuba13
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 12:43pm
  Being elected to Congress?
  
  Report this comment
- TSUNAMI_22
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:00pm
  @ civilwarcometh
  
  I wonder what she would say if the AR manufacturers stopped providing weapons to the military all together and forced them to use only the weapons that she proposes be “exempted” from the proposed ban?
  
  Answer: She’d want to ban those too under the same BS guise.
  
  The only way to keep our rights is to exercise them frequently so they aren’t forgotten or diluted. This “ban” is nothing more than an overt power-grab by the elitists who are in search of some r’tarded utopian ideology.
  
  As a California resident (or inmate as it were), I am already writing my last testament to explain to our posterity why I may have to do what the government is forcing the free patriots still remaining to possibly do…..to resist on moral grounds the tyranny they propose and inflict.
  
  In the beginning of the next conflict, patriots will all be initially martyred as terrorists in the media and in the classrooms. In the end, the truth will become apparent and the patriots will be CORRECTLY recognized as the runners of the tyrannical gauntlet just as the founders intended.
  
  This is why the Second Amendment SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
  
  Report this comment
- glckgrl
  Posted on March 14, 2013 at 7:28pm
  Maybe little dick durbin had too much absolute vodka and needs a pee test along with the senior senator who flunked sixth grade.
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.