
(Photo: Shutterstock.com)
Earlier this month, a baby born with HIV was reportedly cured of the disease. Now, a similar treatment is being said to have cured 14 adults.
New Scientist reported that researchers with the Pasteur Institute in Paris evaluated HIV positive patients treated with antiretrovial drugs at a time earlier than when most patients would begin taking the medication.
The study published in the journal PLOS Pathogens states that the researchers studied 70 patients who began antiretroviral drug treatment within 10 weeks of infection. All of the patients reviewed had continued with their treatment regime for the duration of three years, on average, but had treatment interrupted and stopped for a variety of reasons. It was at this point that the researchers became interested in what happened afterward.
Although the majority relapsed and had to start treatment again, 14 patients were able to remain off the drugs. They have not relapsed in several years since and one patient has even gone a full decade without having to take the medication again so far.
These 14, like the baby who was reportedly cured earlier this month, were only “functionally cured,” meaning they still had traces of the virus inside them, but it was at a level where the body could stave it off naturally without outside treatment. Therefore, although the patients might be considered “cured,” the disease is not entirely eradicated from their bodies.
The scientists stated they are unsure exactly how or why these patients specifically were able to achieve a functional cure while others relapsed and needed treatment again. But New Scientist reported lead author Asier Sáez-Cirión with the Pasteur Institute saying that they did confirm none of the 14 patients were people naturally resistant to HIV, which is about 1 percent of the population.
“These individuals hold important clues in the search for a functional HIV cure,” the paper stated.
“Given the difficulty of eradicating HIV-1, a functional cure for HIV-infected patients appears to be a more reachable short-term goal.”
The scientists also believe this study further supports the importance of early detection as it may limit viral diversity and could protect against chronic immune activation.

An OraQuick oral HIV test, that will give results in about 20 minutes, is held inside the Whitman-Walker Health mobile testing vehicle during a program giving free tests on National Black HIV/AIDS Awareness Day near the Anacostia Metro station February 7, 2013 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
“There are three benefits to early treatment,” Sáez-Cirión said, according to New Scientist. “It limits the reservoir of HIV that can persist, limits the diversity of the virus and preserves the immune response to the virus that keeps it in check.”
Dr. Andrew Freedman with Cardiff University School of Medicine told BBC that while the study poses “interesting” conclusions, how long exactly these patients will continue to keep the infection in check — whether they can go without medical treatment forever — will take much longer for health researchers to determine.
Read more specifics in the full study here.
In other HIV related news, other scientists are researching the how bee venom could actually prevent the virus. Watch this report for more on this research:
–
Related:
- Doctors: Mississippi Baby ‘Functionally Cured’ of HIV
- Farrakhan Accuses U.S. Gov’t of Plot to Kill Billions Using Eugenics, Planned Parenthood and the AIDS Virus: ‘It Was Concentrated in the Black Community’
- First Human Trial for HIV Vaccine Starting in January
Featured image via Shutterstock.com.





















































































































krish4
Mar. 28, 2013 at 4:27pmAyurvedic medications have been shown to offset symptoms of HIV/AIDS individuals by causing more weight gain than a placebo and have also been shown to have antiviral properties. Although there is opposition to these techniques by ART advocates, many fail to see that the majority of individuals who do use Ayurveda tend to use it in conjunction with ART, leading to a more integrative and holistic approach to treating HIV. Using ART to combat the niche replication cycle of retroviruses and using Ayurveda to kill the viruses released into the bloodstream provides two lines of defense. The marriage of East and West in this situation seems to be a match made in heaven, as it works to rid the body entirely of any HIV residues. Since the virus is constantly at war with their bodies, the adults shown to be “functionally cured” are still at risk of contracting it. I would assert that taking an integrative approach can provide an actual long-term cure for the retrovirus. Would you agree that the world should be working harder to research such therapies?
Report this comment
tharpdevenport
Mar. 17, 2013 at 6:35pmHow long does this semi cure work, though? HIV does reproduce and infect other blood cells. It’s like a tribble, only deadly.
And what good is being functionally cured if you still can’t have sexual relations with your partner without fear of infecting them? That’s like somebody breaking their leg, then setting it and fixing it up with a split and saying they are functionally cured. So? They can barely walk, if at all, and still have injuries.
It seems every three to five years we get another one of these AIDS/HIV news stories that go nowhere, and offer no hope, since years of testing and research need to be done to prove the results and then devise methods to use, and even then there’s no gurantee.
Oh, by the way, if it’s ever cured by a white guy, what will Louis Farahcoco say then?
Report this comment
jeanr
Mar. 15, 2013 at 3:43pmI am trying to have a conversation with you. I honestly do not understand your point. If you rephrase your statement, I would be more than happy to engage you.
Report this comment
jeanr
Mar. 15, 2013 at 4:00pmSorry. That was a reply to walkabout
Report this comment
Nabuquduriuzhur
Mar. 15, 2013 at 3:00pmOne of the more insidious things of HIV is that it can be in the body, but not show up on the tests because of recent infection. From empirical evidence, it appears to not be very contagious, but we don’t actually know that. The irony is that the porn industry with it’s testing programs has given us a better idea of when a person is contagious.
It’s extremely troubling that no one has come up with a vaccine that is more than about 60% effective. Last year, Thailand tested a vaccine on sex workers and their infection rates dropped about 60%, which is a good thing— particularly to that 60% and their “clients”— but what about the 40%? And why only 60% vs. nearly 100% with other vaccines?
It’s symptomatic of the idea of prevention vs. treatment. In the 1990s, it really does appear that the medical industry made a decision (or group of them) that it made them more money to treat illness than to prevent it with vaccines. From the 1940s to about 1990, vaccine after vaccine was developed. Then it all but quit. Even flu vaccinations have deliberately have had shortages almost every year in the last 25 or so.
A major push needs to be done for new vaccines. It’d be nice if people were smart, but most women of my age group went alley cat on out-of marriage sex despite growing up in the church, and by 2000 the average was 5 STIs for each. (Most men this age have never had one.) What about their kids— birth defects and premature birth from STIs? Vaccines could pre
Report this comment
The-Monk
Mar. 15, 2013 at 1:18pmAIDS and HIV has been curable since 1982. A cure was found by Dr. Kaali that needed no drugs. The drug companies purchased those 4 patents and sat on them.
http://www.rexresearch.com/kaali/kaali.htm
http://educate-yourself.org/be/
Anyone can make a device at home and do the same thing.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 5:55pmBlood Electrification. I am going to look at it. I hope I am not wasting my time nor one of my kids comes back from medical school & says “You read what?”
After reading about gram negative (-) & gram positive (+) bacteria I know just enough to be dangerous. :/
Definitely reached beyond my knowledge here.
Report this comment
tothepoint
Mar. 15, 2013 at 12:38pmI pray that this is true and those who suffer from this horrible disease will be healed.
Thank you, God, for this.
Report this comment
Sargeking
Mar. 15, 2013 at 10:49amI might just be spiff balling here but bad choices often equate into bad karma. For example, I no longer fly so the propensity to crash and burn is greatly reduced. I quit riding a motorcycle because I grew weary of the vulnerability factor in a sudden stop and pinch point. I interview my sexual partners before sex and double bag the adventure, regardless. On the other end-scale of life, I’ve stocked-up on survival supplies and I sure am happy! In effect, I followed the advice of Fleetwood Mac, “Go your own way”!
Report this comment
Torchwood-VI
Mar. 15, 2013 at 10:43amAnd this, dear Blaze readers is how/why Obama got in and why stupid liberals continue to get elected and wreck havoc on this country and why republicans/conservatives will continue to lose big.
Are you people listening to yourselves? Substitute HIV for breast cancer or Alzheimers in that story and then reread your comments. No wonder when people hear “conservatives” they think “Intolerant Jesus Freaks”
Report this comment
Locked
Mar. 15, 2013 at 11:17amAmen, Torchwood. Many posters here have been conditioned like Pavlov’s dogs to hear “HIV” and think “God’s judgment against gays.” As someone who lost a (straight) friend in the 1980s due to a tainted blood transfusion, their ignorance irks me to no end.
I wonder how many hear “breast cancer” and think “God’s judgment against women” or “Prostate cancer” and think “God’s judgment against men”?
Report this comment
RaydocX
Mar. 15, 2013 at 11:35amTorchwood, I work with folks with HIV each week, treat them no differently than any other patient.
Breast cancer isn’t communicable.
And my words would not be different regarding my faith in this ‘cure’ for breast cancer, were the reports from the same outlet…
Until it’s peer reviewed and reproduced independently, you risk not just a non-cure, but worse… with communicable disease you risk disease spread… possibly a more resistant disease at that.
Report this comment
Ailius
Mar. 15, 2013 at 12:37pmThe brutal facts of the matter is that your chances of getting this greatly go up if you are homosexual, have a lot of sexual partners, or use drugs. Now, there are exceptions, but even in the case of the gay orgy-going heroin user who caught this disease on four separate occasions, did not Jesus eat with sinners an tax collectors?
They might *deserve* the disease, but even then we should forgive them of their sins as Jesus has forgiven us for ours. God will come. God will dispense appropriate judgement based upon *all* factors, not just the ones visible from our limited human experience. When you judge them, you do so because you lack faith in the coming of God’s kingdom.
Now…as for the liberals. The particular sin of the otherwise holy to lose compassion because of someone’s sin is a tough one. That’s the exact sin which caused Lucifer to became Satan. From a practical standpoint, if as a human being you don’t make that mistake at least once in your life, you aren’t trying. For a liberal to shy away from conservatives because we ‘pass judgement’ is kinda like criticizing us for ‘breathing oxygen’. It’s human nature. Libs do it too. We *all* do it. Get over it.
The particular ones who cite that case are beyond reach. They have already decided what their answer is going to be. There may be hope for them, but it won’t come through rational debate.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 1:06pmSome cancers are communicable or at least their pathogen triggers are. The whole promiscuity thing does not begin & end with homosexuals.
Report this comment
Sargeking
Mar. 15, 2013 at 10:36amViral diversity is predicated on two basic factors. 1) Method of infection and 2) Degree of infection. In other words, if the “method of infection” was via sexual transmission; there is no cure. If the “degree of infection” was via needle injection, the HIV virus was weakened; not unlike Herpes Simplex III deposited on a toilet seat. Yes, you can get V.D. from a toilet seat, if you get down and dirty (and quickly) with a bad one. I’m glad that I’m a man. I can hold “Number Two” until I get home.
Report this comment
RaydocX
Mar. 15, 2013 at 10:11amUhm… any volunteers to see just how cured these folks are?
It wouldn’t matter if it was Miss Universe, I wouldn’t go… swimming in that water hole.
Haven’t heard word one about this in peer reviewed literature… just the lay press. Remember ‘cold fusion?’ I keep getting flashes of ‘I am Legend’ here…
what better way to protect the planet and trap most citizens in a circle of poverty than to infect all but the elite with a virus that will require expensive lifelong treatments, and will impact… reproductive activities.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:40amThis is bad news. No worse, it is exceedingly horrible.
You go to a gay blog & they will drop words like lateral studies, sero-convert and more. But when the study on PreP came out too many of them were talking about tossing their condoms in a garbage can & going barebacking. So word out on the street will be there is a cure and caution will be thrown to the wind.
Report this comment
Locked
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:54am“This is bad news. No worse, it is exceedingly horrible.”
Curing a deadly disease is bad, no, “exceedingly horribly” news?
You realize that HIV and AIDS are NOT “homosexual-only” diseases, right? Your view is like saying insulin is exceedingly horrible because it lets fat people keep eating stuff that’s bad for them and not worry about diabetes, or that chemo is exceedingly horrible because it encourages people to keep smoking and not worry about lung cancer.
If anyone sees “14 people only have trace amounts of HIV and no longer need daily retroviral drugs” and thinks “Sweet, time to have gay orgies!” they’re moronic. This is not a cure (hence the “cure” tag), but it’s a step in the right direction. And that is nothing bad.
Report this comment
comforteagle
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:57amThats like saying people stop putting on insect repellent in africa after they found the cure for malaria.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 10:11amLocked
I stand by my statement. I read a blog on PreP. The only thing I might think is a bright spot is that they “white”gays seem to have AIDS under control. So education may work. Yet AIDS is exploding in the cities.
Another thing is that people think that you can have a vaccine against everything, we but say “Make it so” like the fictional character Jean Luc Picard on Star Trek. Politicians like A Gore believe we can merely throw some funding at some scientist & we will get a scientific advancement as per schedule. such a belief is a conceit.
It has been posited that the “library” of the immune system is like a system cache of a computer. You can only put so many things in before you have to dump other stuff out. If that is true which immunities will you toss?
Then you have to look at cures like Draco. I have to wonder about a cure like Draco. I read the description of how it works. I actually believe that it will work. But might it be like the turn of the 20th century cure for syphilis, which was mercury? By about the 3rd or 4th time you use Draco, you might be free of whatever virus, but your body might be ravaged similarly to how the body was ravaged by the syphilis cure, mercury?
Can advance tech really cure us from all the dangers of licentiousness, hetero or ****?
Report this comment
DimmuBorgir
Mar. 15, 2013 at 10:17am@ COMFORT
Africans don’t even use bug spray!!! American charities have to send mosquito nets or the poor little Africans will all die.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 10:39amDimmuBorgir
I’d rather they just drop all research and let the bastards die.
***
I disagree. Some people in the gay community have spoken up and have said that AIDS research does get too much money. I do not have a link but I have seen the stories.
If we would take a proportional approach as to how many people die and whether they were engage in risky activities, then a solid case that some of the money going to fight AIDS should go to other diseases.
I do not feel bad saying so. After all the venom I have seen on gays blogs about heart disease or diabetes, I feel perfectly justified.
HIV would spread pretty good among heteros if they have multiple partners and especially if they have other STDs that assist HIV by breaking the skin barrier for them.
According to research Americans & Africans have the same number of lifetime partners on average, 7. The difference is that Americans tend to have them serially & Africans tend to have them more at the same time. They think that is a really big difference. There are other aspects as well. Such men in South Africa like having dry sex because it provides more sensation then waiting for the body to provide natural lubrication via foreplay or whatever. Check Discover magazine. I am not making this up.
Report this comment
Locked
Mar. 15, 2013 at 10:57am@Dim
“AIDS is sooo a GAY and Black issue.”
Thanks for strawmanning what I said. Nice try, troll.
“I have never once feared being infected with AIDS or HIV. sooooooo”
Why should your personal feelings about it matter? As someone who worked for a hospital for years, awareness and testing for HIV were certainly a concern. And I’m a white, male, heterosexual, soooo… our anecdotes cancel each other out?
“I’d rather they just drop all research and let the bastards die.:
As I said to another poster here, I certainly hope you someday look in the mirror and realize what a monster you appear to the rest of us. May God have mercy on your twisted soul. Doubly so for you, as “the bastards” you’re referring to are not only gays, but blacks.
@Walkabout
“I stand by my statement.”
That potential cures for deadly diseases are exceedingly horrible? All righty. Feel free to step away from all medicine; give up your vaccinations, medications, and treatments.
Meanwhile the rest of us will applaud the scientific progress being made and our fellow human beings who can be helped.
Report this comment
DimmuBorgir
Mar. 15, 2013 at 11:05am@ LOCKED
So I’m a monster because someone else had unprotected sex with a virus ridden man-slut and I don’t shed a tear for them??
I’m sure you’re just as sympathetic to life-long smokers with lung disease.
We each have to deal with the consequences of our actions. So take your bleeding heart somewhere else.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 11:08amLocked
So you believe that if there are a 1,000 disease that afflict mankind that it is possible to inoculate against all 1,000 of them at the same time?
You totally ignored the “system cache” analogy, because you have no counter argument & you DARE NOT countenance it. There are trade offs. I can see your lack of training in certain curriculum plain as day.
I did not say I was anti-medicine. I said that tech cannot cure any & all ills. That is a difference and is a valid distinction.
Report this comment
DimmuBorgir
Mar. 15, 2013 at 11:09am@WALKABOUT
FYI, An African saying he doesn’t want to wait for the body… That’s called rape. It’s kinda rampant, especially as a cure for aids, gotta love those brainy Africans
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 11:17amDimmuBorgir
The women is consenting to sex, so it might not be considered rape. However the women does feel pressured to go along with it and is probably not enjoying it as much if at all.
So you are getting more tearing of the lining of the lining then you would normally have.
I am going to look up the stupid articles now as proof. There are good ways to have sex & their are bad ways. We as a society are being told than anything goes, which is why there is so much wrong with the sexual revolution and the LGBT rights movement. As a society we are going to have to relearn what we already know.
Report this comment
Locked
Mar. 15, 2013 at 11:26am@Dim
You’re a monster for wishing that gays and blacks (and all those with HIV) would just die, yes.
“I’m sure you’re just as sympathetic to life-long smokers with lung disease. ”
I’m certainly not the one going around saying that all smokers are bastards who should die, or wishing the same fate to those who suffer lung cancer from second-hand smoke. You, however, did just that in regards to HIV.
@Walkabout
“You totally ignored the “system cache” analogy”
I simply found it a poor excuse. Your reasoning is that if we keep curing diseases, we might not be able to cure others in the future.
I’d love to see a cite of this. Even if it’s so, I’m not sure how sympathetic I’d be to the argument. Why not focus treatments on a specific population then? For example, I’m never going to get sickle-cell anemia; does that mean that we should stop treatments for those who are at risk or who currently have it, just because I’d never use it as a white man? Of course not! I’ll never get breast cancer either, but I don’t think we should stop searching for ways to cure it for those who might or do!
Your argument makes sense only if we’re going to vaccinate EVERYONE against so many diseases that our body won’t be able to keep up. I don’t think anyone has made that argument… and it seems to mix up vaccinations and retro-viral cocktails.
Report this comment
DimmuBorgir
Mar. 15, 2013 at 11:56am@LOCKED
YES THEY SHOULD DIE!!!
Look man this isn’t 1985 anymore. The only real way to get AIDS is to have sex with someone with AIDS…
SO by all means locked, go have some **** sex with your 20 partners and go get yourself cured after.
I am so against the “cure” for AIDS that I will go out of my way to purchase a rival product if the one I wanted is one that donates to AIDS research.
We just simply disagree, I think gays and blacks have lower moral standards and will have sex with just about anything, even if it’s coughing up blood and looks like a walking corpse.
So yes, those bastards can die.
Report this comment
DimmuBorgir
Mar. 15, 2013 at 11:58am@LOCKED
Hope you don’t catch any second hand AIDS
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 1:11pmLocked
I simply found it a poor excuse. Your reasoning is that if we keep curing diseases, we might not be able to cure others in the future
***
You are either ignorant or you are purposefully misrepresenting the argument.
I did not argue that there are disease that cannot be cured. I argued that the human immune system can only be primed against so many threats at one time. This argument/hypothesis has been made outside of the of the whole controversy regarding AIDS.
Would you be more comfortable if we only discussed this using the Bible as a reference?
Report this comment
Locked
Mar. 15, 2013 at 1:27pm@Dim
“Look man this isn’t 1985 anymore. The only real way to get AIDS is to have sex with someone with AIDS…”
Good Lord, you’re ignorant. This isn’t 1985 any more; no one realistically makes the argument that HIV is a “gays-only disease.” And I don’t know anyone who honestly thinks all gays and blacks should die.
Well, perhaps you do. I’m pretty sure you’re a Poe though.
@Walkabout
I argued that the human immune system can only be primed against so many threats at one time.”
And my response was that that’s a terrible excuse to call any progress on HIV or AIDS “excessively horrible,” and explained exactly why I think so. To put it a different way, I think it’s incredibly callous to tell someone dying of AIDS that any possibility of hope for them is “excessively horrible.” Granted, not as terrible as Dim calling them bastards and wishing they would die, but still incredibly callous.
“This argument/hypothesis has been made outside of the of the whole controversy regarding AIDS.”
Though the topic at hand is AIDS. But if you do have medical journals talking about why AIDS should not be cured due to cache systems of immunity, sure, I’d be glad to peruse them, and I’d thank you for the information.
“Would you be more comfortable if we only discussed this using the Bible as a reference?”
Unlikely, as the Bible doesn’t mention AIDS and isn’t relevant to the discussion at hand?
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 2:32pmDimmuBorgir
I must have missed this or forgot it. It is estimated that only 35% of HIV is transmitted by sex. The gay lobby keeps telling us look AIDS in Africa is a hetero disease.
The online Discover article is short. a very fast but very informative read.
“A study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, for instance, found that 39 percent of HIV-positive, vaccinated infants had uninfected mothers”
http://discovermagazine.com/2003/jun/breakaids#.UUNn-5YQP3g
“dry sex” reference, but not the one I wanted to link. I’ll keep looking.
“Feuer confirms, African women have higher exposure to risk because of a male liking for “dry sex,” which can easily cause lesions because of the lack of lubrication.”
http://www.monitor.net/monitor/0306a/copyright/ac-africanaids.html
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 2:37pmDimmuBorgir
Not the Discover link I was looking for, but it is reputable.
non-condom use and preference for “dry sex,”
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2443629/
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 2:53pmLocked,
You are as bad on LGBT/AIDS as The_Jerk is on JEWS/Israel.
I did not say that we should not look for a vaccine. I said & I meant that a vaccine would not be the panacea that many people thin kit would be. I also believe that with a vaccine the death rate could possibly go up. Which I know you will “totally” not understand or misrepresent. While searching for a citation I did find where B cells could
“B cells can produce as many as” 10 to the 14th” conformationally different forms.”
Whether this proves you right or myself I do not know. I don’t know how fast a immune system can produce these combination. It matters.
Remember there are 4 or more strains of HIV. We are dealing with strains I & II I believe. Will a vaccine work against 3 & 4?
Seeing as how there or Multiple drug resistant syphilis, gonorrhea and other STDs, we should be doing more than just trying to find a medical silver bullet. That smacks of a leftist orthodox mystic dogma. In addition to medical research we should use self control. With enough self control we could wipe out AIDS in 100 years regardless if there is a medical cure or not. But it appears using medical science & self control is a path not taken.
Report this comment
Locked
Mar. 15, 2013 at 3:30pm@Walkabout
“You are as bad on LGBT/AIDS as The_Jerk is on JEWS/Israel.”
Whaaaa? How does this even remotely compare? Am I somehow blaming AIDS cases on heterosexuals or something?
“I did not say that we should not look for a vaccine.”
And I never accused you of that – I said that it’s callous of you to call any progress or potential cure against HIV “excessively horrible.” Because it is! Also note that again you are confusing (or deliberately exchanging) a vaccine – which is not being discussed here – with anti-retroviral cocktails – which are the basis of this “cure.”
“I also believe that with a vaccine the death rate could possibly go up.”
This is incredibly unlikely, though if you have some sort of data to suggest this… as said… all ears. Even with a vaccine or treatment for other STDs, did death rates go up? You mentioned drug-resistant STDs, and those are definitely a problem… but a few hundred years ago about 25% of Europe had syphilis. I don’t see how one can argue that it’s worse that we could treat/prevent/cure those cases than let their brains become swiss-cheese in stage three.
“Seeing as how there or Multiple drug resistant syphilis, gonorrhea and other STDs, we should be doing more than just trying to find a medical silver bullet.”
I never said otherwise; I think both education AND medicine should be utilized. But -you- were the one who said this progress was “exceedingly horrible.” I disagree!
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 4:27pm” but a few hundred years ago about 25% of Europe had syphilis. I don’t see how one can argue that it’s worse that we could treat/prevent/cure those cases than let their brains become swiss-cheese in stage three.”
I knew it was bad. Just not how bad. One author recently published a book that Puritanism was in response to the Syphilis epidemic. Well it does not seem that syphilis was at 25% in the 19th century. Until penicillin the treatment was mercury. I don’t think syphilis was controlled by mercury. There simple were not the doctors nor the money.
After the recent rise of AIDS in the inner city 2.3% of 8,500 people surveyed I can see the disease getting worse with or without a vaccine. Like I said there are more HIV types around.
Maybe we have seen the extent of what “nature” can throw at us. Don’t know.
I can remember reading 5 or 10 years ago that there were 4 strains of viral hepatitis & we had vaccine for 2 of them. Now I see we have a vaccine in the works for C & there is one approved in China for E. I know that E has been seen in New Orleans. I wonder what the CDC is doing about it vaccine-wise. There is a limit to what “nature” can throw at us because there are only so many permutations or combination of viruses possible. But the list might be larger than what our immune system can be primed for at any one time. After the emergence of hepatitis E, I have not heard of a subsequent strain of hepatitis, so maybe there is not one. We
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 4:37pmAs of 2011 there does not appear to be a vaccine against hepatitis C.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 4:39pm“Among those chronically infected, the risk of cirrhosis after 20 years varies between studies but has been estimated at ~10%-15% for men and ~1-5% for women. The reason for this difference is not known. Once cirrhosis is established, the rate of developing hepatocellular carcinoma is ~1%-4% per year”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hepatitis_c
Kind of takes the bloom of the whole 1960s Sexual Revolution Manifesto.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 4:45pmThis is a reason why so many people are against promiscuous lifestlyes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_with_hepatitis_C
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 5:03pmWell, 2 or 3 years ago the homosexually community said they were not the majority of cases anymore. It was a lie. They were still above 50%.
As of 2011 they still are 62% to 65% of all new cases.
They do try hard.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/basic.htm#hivaidsexposure
Report this comment
Libertyluvnmomma
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:34amWith this kind of hope maybe these 14 will be hitting the clubs again and contributing to the gene pool.
Report this comment
Grey Eagle
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:45amIt did not mention if the patients with traces of HIV could still pass it on to others. There have been patients over the years whose HIV levels would fall to undetectable limits, then roar back. The virus hides in various places in the body.
Report this comment
Cavallo
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:45amIt doesn’t say if they can or cannot still transmit the virus. It says they still have it, but it just doesn’t cause any symptoms or side effects. I don’t see in the article if they are still contagious.
Report this comment
MN NICE
Mar. 15, 2013 at 12:40pmDefinately good news for Magic Johnson and his back door virus…
M y
A ss
G ots
I nfection
C oach
My bet is it will still be communicable
Report this comment
WTFurnuts
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:26amhiv will now explode. no need for safe sex.
Report this comment
DimmuBorgir
Mar. 15, 2013 at 10:22amLuckily it will explode in all the immoral groups of people
Report this comment
RightUnite
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:24amProbably be cheaper to give them the little blue pill, given to them by the cute little death panel.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:43amI expect death panels to do this a generation or two into Obama Care. There will be gays on the panels but they will be part of the ruling class. They will look down on everyone else like the rest of the ruling class and after looking at the financial books, they will make that decision.
Report this comment
demsrtraitors
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:23amwill there ever be a cure for liberalism?
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 5:08pmDoing things the right way or death of the host. Those are the only cures.
“Although MSM represent about 4% of the male population in the United States,4 in 2010, MSM accounted for 78% of new HIV infections among males and 63% of all new infections.2 MSM accounted for 52% of all people living with HIV infection in 2009, the most recent year these data are available”
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/us.htm
Report this comment
eaglescout1998
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:17amI highly doubt a cure will come to market. It is much more profitable to treat diseases than it is to cure them.
Report this comment
term limits for congress
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:06amI’m sure the treatment will not be covered thanks to obamacare.
Report this comment
ShamanWorld
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:03amThe govt has had cures for many diseases long ago. The question has only been “who gets the cure, and who doesn’t. The greenies and population control freaks are letting diseases like AIDS and cancer cull the population. Patents and inventions and discoveries and breakthroughs that could change and revolutionize America and the world are made in colleges and labs DAILY across our nation, only to be bought by corporation and put under lock and key. The big oil money lobby is the reason why renewable, and maximizing fuels have not been allowed to emerge is because the oil industry buys up the inventions fuel efficient motors, fuels and batteries. Just as the Pharmacuetical, Tobacco, and Alcohol, lobby pay money to politicians to block marijuana legalization. Even though, the people dying and overdosing are from alcohol, Painkillers, and lung cancer from the poisonous cigarettes. Lastly, as”civilians” we are kept at least 20 years behind the technology curve, and we have some pretty wild stuff at our disposal already. Here’s a few things to consider naturally. Olive leaf the tree of life supplemants(olivus.com) for many different preventative and curative and well being properties, and blue green algae for a super duper boost of minerals and life boosting energy from numerous natural vitamins etc that BGA provides.
Report this comment
hannah
Mar. 15, 2013 at 8:53amThat’s amazing and I only pray aids will be totally eradicated someday. It’s a horrible disease and I think what the scientific world is doing to help get rid of it is wonderful.
Report this comment
Vision Harry
Mar. 15, 2013 at 8:52amAwesome, now queers can have all the deviant intercourse their tiny twisted hearts desire.
Just what we need, losing a bit more accountability.
Report this comment
Kupo
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:23amPretty twisted that you would apparently not want a cure for such a horrible malady just so that we can keep the gays in check.
Report this comment
Locked
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:35amAs someone who lost a (straight) friend who contracted HIV due to a blood transfusion in the 1980s, I certainly hope you someday look in the mirror and realize what a monster you appear to the rest of us. May God have mercy on your twisted soul.
Report this comment
Proverbs17-12NLT
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:43amMagic Johnson?
Report this comment
jeanr
Mar. 15, 2013 at 9:52amI thought that AIDS was a plague send from God for perverted behavior? How the hell did humans thwart that? Weird.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 10:18amKupo
Gays will out gays in check. The truth is going to come at them sideways & they will be madder than HeII once their mass psychosis wears off. Think about it.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 10:45amjeanr
Going along with your perverted world view was it sent to end perverted activity or to curb it to some extent?
Syphilis was quite a scourge. It sure encourage some people to be monogamous. If everyone else was 1/2 as promiscuous as the worst, civilization could very well had a dark age beginning in the 1500s or 1600s.
I take it that you are not very good at mathematical modeling.
Report this comment
jeanr
Mar. 15, 2013 at 3:02pmGranted, math is not my strong point. I would retort, however, that your sentence structuring is as bad as my math. I have no idea what you are trying to say.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Mar. 15, 2013 at 3:25pmThere is nothing wrong with my sentence structuring. I did see where the word encouraged is missing a “d”. I probably did not strike the “d” key hard enough.
Avoid the argument all you want. :)
Report this comment