U.S. Increasing Missiles on the West Coast in Beefed-Up Defense Effort Against N. Korea

This June 2010 photo provided by the U.S. Missile Defense Agency, agency personnel and soldiers from the 6th Air Defense Artillery Brigade from Fort Bliss, Texas fire an interceptor missile from the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Hawaii. (Photo: AP/U.S. Missile Defense Agency)
WASHINGTON (TheBlaze/AP) — In light of North Korea’s recent threats to send a missile toward the United States, the Obama administration announced it would add more interceptors to the West Coast-based missile defense system.
The move reflects concern about North Korea’s focus on developing nuclear weapons and its advances in long-range missile technology, even though tests that could lead to such a missile last year proved unsuccessful.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel planned to announce the decision later Friday. It was first reported by Fox News.
#SecDef #Hagel to make missile defense announcement this afternoon at the Pentagon.
— George Little (@PentagonPresSec) March 15, 2013
In advance of Hagel’s announcement, defense officials confirmed the decision on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly.
The Pentagon intends to add the 14 interceptors to 30 already in place in California and Alaska. That will expand the system’s ability to shoot down long-range missiles in flight before they could reach U.S. territory.
James Miller, defense undersecretary for policy, said in a speech Tuesday that the Pentagon has the ability to deploy up to 14 additional missile interceptors, “if needed.” He did not say in the speech that a decision had been made to do so.
“As we think about our homeland missile-defense posture, we do not have a ‘just-in-time’ policy,’” Miller said. “Our policy is to stay ahead of the threat – and to continue to ensure that we are ahead of any potential future Iranian or North Korean ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile) capability.”
Miller noted that last December, North Korea launched a satellite into space, demonstrating its mastery of some of the same technologies required for development of an intercontinental ballistic missile.
“Our concern about Pyongyang’s potential ICBM capability is compounded by the regime’s focus on developing nuclear weapons. North Korea’s third nuclear test last month is obviously a serious concern for all nations,” he said.
North Korea recently threatened to reduce Seoul to a “sea of fire” and stage pre-emptive nuclear attacks on Washington.
“North Korea’s shrill public pronouncements underscore the need for the U.S. to continue to take prudent steps to defeat any future North Korean ICBM,” Miller said in his speech on Tuesday.
Watch this report about the addition of the missile interceptors:
This news also comes at the same time as reports from South Korean news agencies say North Korea test fired two short-range missiles into the Sea of Japan Friday. More on that story in this report:
–
Related:
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

















































































































Comments (45)
sinner-saint
Posted on March 16, 2013 at 3:55amObama is going to CA…..if the twatling in N. Korea is gonna strike the West coast, he had better hurry while getting is good. Don’t ya just love it when the communists want to kill each other.
Report this comment
Trigus
Posted on March 16, 2013 at 5:41pmWhy they even talking of putting missiles in the Anti-American State of California that willfully Infringes on the Rights of Americans.
I thought we where in the Sequester Period – we do not have funds to put Missiles in California.
Only you can make this Once Great Nation, Great Again.
2013 American Patriot Spring, What will you do?
The distinctions between Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, and Independents are no more. I Am Not A Republican, But An American! – Sons of Liberty
Report this comment
wejromriellromriell
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 10:16amthat just causes pooblems for the rest of us
Report this comment
LimaBean
Posted on March 16, 2013 at 1:08amNot the first time drones were tested in Oxnard….Korean War.
Report this comment
LimaBean
Posted on March 16, 2013 at 1:05amhttp://www.kclu.org/2013/02/25/navy-outlines-proposal-to-make-ventura-county-home-for-drone-operations-on-west-coast/
Report this comment
LimaBean
Posted on March 16, 2013 at 1:02amhttp://www.scpr.org/news/2013/02/23/36085/drones-in-mugu-military-proposes-a-new-drone-base/
Report this comment
media-bias-steals-elections
Posted on March 16, 2013 at 12:47amThe United States used to have bombers in the air 24/7 when there was real threats? It was expensive, but it worked?
Report this comment
lessoneleg
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 8:11pmThe North Koreans have only one true asset to use. Human abundance to overwhelm the border line. Think of it, the NK can’t use a Nuke on a battle field because they too have to trample across it to get to the other side. No good loosing all your troops to radiation poisoning within a couple of weeks. And air power isn’t their strong suit. Missiles whilst interesting, are expensive and are strategic not land taking.
So it comes down to overwhelming numbers of highly agitated crazed North Koreans with discarded Chinese AK-47 knockoffs. And old vintage trucks.
If North Korea invades, it has to be done hard and fast. Question is? Will the Obama WH permit a “scorched earth” permission of South Korean based units to wipe out maybe 300,000 to 500,000 NK?
Report this comment
muffythetuffy
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 8:55pmTHOSE MISSALS WERE DEVELOPED BY THE BUSH-RUMSFIELD PENTAGON
Obama promised to the World and to our enemies that he would not weaponize Space and would eliminate our nuclear weapons. Senator Boxer, Fingold and Nancy Pelosi better stay away from California.
Report this comment
YankeeDelta68
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 9:53pmno he wont without asking moochell!!
Report this comment
lel2007
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 8:06pmThat little twit running North Korea isn’t going to attack any country. He’s looking for attention and most of all money. It a brand of extortion perfected by his old-man.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 5:25pmWe could absorb a hit on the West coast…or the Northeast. Hehe.
Report this comment
Restored One
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 7:07pmObama is scheduled to come here to Cali next week I think. Crap, I better pack a bag and head to Reno. I dont want to be hit in the cross fire.
Report this comment
kindling
Posted on March 16, 2013 at 1:19amAs long as it stays in a Democrat held city like SF or LA….then we could take CA back! Personally I am waiting for an earthquake so no one can blame anyone else.
Report this comment
eagledown
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 4:48pmIf North Korea launches one at the west coast (sadly, where I live), you can rest-assured that you’ll get a yawn, a good night’s sleep, followed by a trip to Vegas in the aftermath from your Mao in the White House.
Also, you f*ing idiots who voted for this POS.. TWICE!. YOU. YES YOU. Voting has consequences, and YOU will have blood on your hands. I will also blame the moron Repub’s who DIDN’T vote; your idiots to.
That 3:00am call, will be from frantic Sub Commanders waiting for return fire orders for the Key Codes.
Ring…
Ring…
Ring..
Yawn. *** O dreaming… “I wonder if I should invite Tiger out to Hawaii next week?”.. zzzzzzzzzz
Report this comment
Restored One
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 7:10pmObama is coming to CA to trump up cash and support for the 2014 elections. If Obama cancels his visit to CA, then we will know that he approves of an attack. But then where will he get his mega bucks from.
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 4:25pmWow, our foreign policy has been such a wonderful success.. not nearly as successful as our domestic policies.. that is.. if the goal all around was to destroy the United States.
1st Ambassador assassinated in 30 years, Iran less than a year away from getting a nuke (Obama’s claim), Anti-Western extremists in power in Egypt, World opinion of the US plummeting (http://www.gallup.com/poll/161201/leadership-earning-lower-marks-worldwide.aspx?ref=image).. Now North Korea is threatening war..
So how about all those successes in make the US a safer more prosperous nation in which to live?
Report this comment
MDECKER
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 5:22pmThumb-up to you!
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 6:23pmCAVALLO: Just caught Hagel ‘s press conference : the guy read his talking points word for word..slowly..constantly looking down at the script. Guess Hagel is just another Obama robot / parrot. Picked because he will just push the agenda . No questions asked. No original thinking. Just another Far Left Center For America Agenda parrot.
Report this comment
Sargeking
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 4:01pmThe Liberals hate to be reminded of it but it was their patron saint Bill Clinton that gave North Korea the means to build a nuclear device. Thanks Libs. We owe it all to you. Alaska and California especially “thank you”!
Report this comment
YesLiberalsAreThatDumb
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:55pmWait, isn’t N. Korea a “tiny country” like Iran, Venezuela, and Cuba? I thought that tiny countries were not a threat….
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 4:05pmThat’s what Barry said …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ew5qP2oPdtQ
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 4:54pmNazi Germany (1941)
* Land Area (268,829 sq mi)
* Population 1941 90,030,775
World Pop. 1940 2.3 billion
Iran
* Population (2012 census) 75,149,669 (17th)
* Land area 636,372 sq mi
World Pop. 12013 ~7 billion
Obviously, Obama is a very good demagogue (spinner), but not a very good statesman. Smaller countries have messed with the larger countries before and a lot of people died.
Report this comment
YesLiberalsAreThatDumb
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:54pmHold on, North Korea has nukes??
I thought Clinton stopped that in the 90s with the free oil and food program?
No? YOU MEAN THAT THE COMMUNISTS LIED? SAY IT ISN’T SO!!
One thing that is ashame. Too bad Bush implemented the missile defense program, and it is up and running in Alaska. A few nukes on the west coast would eliminate a lot of lib-tards who were against the missle defense system in the first place! Apparently, it is “bad” for US to be able to defend against NUCLEAR ATTACK… YES LIBERALS ARE THAT DUMB!
Report this comment
Sargeking
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:47pmAfter we intercept and shoot down one of their missiles, we should fire back with ten of our own. Let/s see who wins that battle.
Report this comment
Rayblue
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:42pmWould you like mushrooms on that California Style ?
Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:55pmBlooming Mushrooms…… it’s what’s for lunch.
Report this comment
kaydeebeau
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:36pmWait – wasn’t N. Korea in that list of tiny countries he named a few years ago that don’t pose a threat like the USSR did? I thought Dennis Rodman took care of relations with N. Korea?
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 6:33pmDon’t forget that 2 or 3 years ago that Obama nixed a missile defence based in Eastern Europe.
Did anti-ballistic missile tech all the sudden get better? If it did not work then, why does it work now?
Have not heard of any recent tests.
Report this comment
AUsername
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:33pmgood work now do that on the east coast and stop invading Africa and the Middle East.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 4:36pmLike your new icon.
A ballistic missile defense does no good against cruise missiles or maybe even short or medium range surface to surface missiles launched from a ship.
Not sure how effective the DHS/Coast Guard is at checking merchant shipping. You might be able to literally sail into an American harbor and detonate one.
You cannot win on defense.
Report this comment
huey6367
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:30pmMaybe they should put defense up around Washington. That’s the weakest portion of the country.
Report this comment
Outlaw_Josey_Wales
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:29pmNancy Pelosi lives in California, maybe its because of her, that interceptor missiles are being deployed to the west coast.
Report this comment
IMCHRISTIAN
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 4:00pmThat and his movie star friends and pretty close to the Hawaiian Islands
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:27pmWait.. isn’t the missile defense system that George Bush wanted to create the system they all poo pooed and mocked him about? Hey, if they blow up Nancy Pelosi, can it be our turn to take to the streets and declare “not in our name!” in reference to any retaliation?
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 6:34pmCAVALLO: Yes. Remember how the Left mocked Bush about his labeling North Korea, Iran and Iraq as the Axis of Evil ? We had an early taste of the Democrat’s Alinsky ridicule tactic back during the Bush years. We have been tsunamied by it during the Obama years.
Report this comment
crusaderx9
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:26pmobama will not be able to protect us as all our enemies (and allies) have watched him dismantle our institutions of security while over relying on drones and small missiles to carry out his infantile narrow-spectrum foreign policy.
Now we are back in a missile crisis on one front from a rogue state while China and Russia lay ready to pounce on our interests, all while obama abandons his lie and finally admits that Iran’s nuke program is not about domestic energy production.
Al Queda and associated movements continue to proliferate and grow bolder while obama is on his way to losing his second war.
It won’t be long now.
Report this comment
Daddy Hawg
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:23pmBeefing up our defenses on the west coast and Alaska while also trying to take our 2nd Amendment rights away. Kind of ironic isn’t it?
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:20pmIt doesn’t matter how great your weapons are; you have to have a president that is not too cowardly to use them.
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:14pmSo Obama has decided to actually deploy our interceptor system? Or is this with an ‘don’t fire until after the warheads hit our cities’ caveat in the orders?
Report this comment
huey6367
Posted on March 15, 2013 at 3:10pmLet’s all sit back and watch Obie ‘f’ this up.
Report this comment