
This vessel was spotted in the Florida Keys. (Photo: Imgur)
Spotting this out in the middle of the ocean in the Florida Keys while on a boating excursion might raise some eyebrows.
A member of the social news site Reddit going by Tackorjibe posted this image on Imgur and began a thread to try and identify it. Tackorjibe claims he found it recently and noted that the orange, floating vessel had U.S. Air Force decals on it. Some have speculated that it was a pod filled with drugs. Another joked “good try North Korea.” But the majority sided with it being a target drone.
Looking into target drones used by the military, TheBlaze too thinks this could be the case.
More specifically, the vessel appears to be a BQM-167 Air Force Subscale Aerial Target, which was used in air-to-air tests and evaluation programs, according to the military’s fact sheet about the device.
These are more photos of a similar drone being recovered:

The crew from Florida Offshore steadies and lowers the BQM-167 sub-scale drone to the cradle after a recovery demonstration July 22, 2009, in the waters off Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla. The ship used for recovery is one of only three 120-foot boats owned by the Air Force. The Florida Offshore crew is contracted through the 82nd Aerial Targets Squadron to help recover sub-scale drones after they are shot down during live-fire exercises. (Photo: U.S. Air Force photo/Samuel King Jr.)

Byron Howle helps diver Ray Gallien to secure the BQM-167 sub-scale drone during a recovery demonstration recently in the waters off Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla. (Photo: U.S. Air Force photo/Samuel King Jr.)
Here’s more about the BQM-167 from the fact sheet:
The drone is land-launched using a rocket assisted takeoff and launched from a rail system. The drone can be recovered by a parachute recovery system either from land or water. Recovered targets are repaired, tested and reused. The BQM-167A can carry a full range of current Air Force subscale target payloads which include a scoring system, infrared and radar enhancements, electronic attack pods and a chaff/flare dispenser set.
A Redditor claiming to work at Tyndall AFB control tower wrote they can confirm it is in fact a BQM-167 and it came from them.
Talk on the Reddit thread quickly changed from what the object could be to how much it could raise if it were picked up and sold — and whether that would even be legal. The fact sheet states that the device costs $570,000. According to a 2005 story posted by a Redditor, 60 of these drones made by Northrup Grumman were purchased for $24 million.
What would the reward be for picking up and returning such a device to the military — if any? A Redditor mentioned laws in the U.S. seeking to protect sensitive information and technologies might apply in this instance. The Redditor mein_liebchen called up this story regarding salvage rights:
You will recall the case of the Spanish fisherman in 1966 who saw where the US lost a hydrogen bomb at sea. He asserted salvage rights and was paid millions…
Once the bomb was located, Simó Orts appeared at the First District Federal Court in New York City with his lawyer, Herbert Brownell, formerly Attorney General of the United States under President Dwight D. Eisenhower, claiming salvage rights on the recovered hydrogen bomb. According to Craven:
It is customary maritime law that the person who identifies the location of a ship to be salved has the right to a salvage award if that identification leads to a successful recovery. The amount is nominal, usually 1 or 2 percent, sometimes a bit more, of the intrinsic value to the owner of the thing salved. But the thing salved off Palomares was a hydrogen bomb, the same bomb valued by no less an authority than the Secretary of Defense at $2 billion—each percent of which is, of course, $20 million.
All in all though, the Redditor who posted the image said he decided to leave it where it floated.
“Left it. Didn’t want to be the idoit (sic) on the news who died when it blew up,” Tackorjibe wrote.
Another fisherman finding a similar target a couple years ago towed it back to shore with him and turned it in to the local air force base. The account of the 2010 recovery doesn’t mention if the fisherman receiving a reward or not.





















































































































Comments (139)
Phreqguru
Mar. 18, 2013 at 12:00pmThe Navy has been using aerial targets like these for 40 years off the coast California, this is just a newer version and moves faster than a BQM-34
Report this comment
TH30PH1LUS
Mar. 18, 2013 at 1:27pm“You want a reward? Sorry, sequestration. Thanks for bringin’ it back, brah.”
Report this comment
KickinBack
Mar. 18, 2013 at 4:01pmLooks relatively intact. Hope whoever was using it for target practice will be better against the real thing.
Report this comment
Caniac Steve
Mar. 18, 2013 at 4:07pmWorks for me !!!
Report this comment
TexasCommonSense
Mar. 18, 2013 at 4:37pmI’ve never seen one of those up close in one piece before.
Former US Navy, FC2(SW)
Report this comment
yougottabekidding
Mar. 18, 2013 at 5:02pmKickinBack
Some of the ones we fired on were electronic measures of proximity missiles, so they were not actually supposed to be damaged just send data. Unfortunately our missiles would track so well we destroyed the target drones
In other words they didn’t look like that!
Report this comment
83plus
Mar. 18, 2013 at 6:34pmSeeing that makes me think of the Bell X-1.
Report this comment
pschlentz
Mar. 18, 2013 at 7:51pm@KickinBack:
Hopefully not, the nex drone might be heading at ‘We the People’s’ way….
Report this comment
TROONORTH
Mar. 18, 2013 at 7:53pmSeeing that makes me think of ‘Uncle Martin’.
Report this comment
Wolfgang the Gray
Mar. 18, 2013 at 8:16pmYes, these are common items for target practice for missiles (much cheaper than a plane). As for finding it & salvage rights, I guess it would depend on it if was within the 20-mi area off the US coast. If it was in International waters, I would say “Yippie, look what I get to keep”. As for asking for a reward to give it back to the government, they might reward you with a pair of concrete galoshes or maybe a tax audit & getting your name added to the terrorist list. That does seem to be how “The most transparent administration in US history” rolls.
Report this comment
inblack
Mar. 18, 2013 at 8:27pmThe anti-missile shield was tested on this – they thought it was a hit.
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Mar. 18, 2013 at 9:42pmMy God, who fricking cares if a military practice target is found floating. Geez……………How about some real news. Like what kind of raping criminal activity is the US govt doing to us today?
Report this comment
TugboatPhil
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:40pmThe Navy used to have a Det from VC-6 in Roosevelt Roads, PR that launched those. Not sure where they’d be now. I was on an Oiler in the early 80s and we fished one out while in the vicinity of Roosey Roads.
Report this comment
BobM
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:53pmJust an updated version of the “Firebee” drone.
Report this comment
commies.in.the.wire
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:49pmPlenty heading our way. Do not discount any of this. Keep prepping, guns, ammo, water, food & a plan. The commies are inside the wire!
http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2013/01/attention-the-6-stages-of-the-nwo-to-start-the-civil-war-in-the-united-states-videos-2447936.html
Report this comment
scarydave
Mar. 19, 2013 at 12:42amI hope it ends up on Ebay.
Report this comment
KickinBack
Mar. 19, 2013 at 1:24am~yougottabekidding
Thanks for the info. I wasn’t aware they used laser technology for training purposes. Yet I myself am looking to joining the Navy this year, so forgive me for my ignorance. Hopefully won’t happen again. ;)
Report this comment
yougottabekidding
Mar. 19, 2013 at 5:46amKickinBack
The Navy I come from thought that Flash Gordon was the only place Lasers existed.
A man once told me- “If you don’t learn something new each day, even if it’s how not to do something, it’s a wasted day”.
Good luck with the Navy.
Report this comment
Wilma
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:56amIn the Keys we call that a good fishing spot for dolphin.
Report this comment
RIDEMODELS
Mar. 19, 2013 at 12:47amRappers ride around in big billboards on 26″ rims announcing to the world that they have made it in the drug world and they also ship coke in bright orange subs……go figure.
Report this comment
cloudsofwar
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:45amlaunched from a rail system? sounds like a WW2 german v2.
Report this comment
Max jones
Mar. 18, 2013 at 12:05pmThe system used to launch is not on “train tracks”. The rail is an inclined launching system. The drone itself is on the rails.
Report this comment
beeboop
Mar. 18, 2013 at 12:20pmYou mean a V1.
Report this comment
Fenrirsulfr
Mar. 18, 2013 at 2:03pmExactly right, it’s a souped up really awesome 21st century V1 without a warhead.
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Mar. 18, 2013 at 3:07pmDer Chermans wehre wery clever.
Report this comment
cloudsofwar
Mar. 18, 2013 at 4:38pm@ beeboop….. your right v1 or buzz bomb. this is another drone? just what we need more drones.
Report this comment
bubbamoosecat
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:35pmYou mean V-1.
Report this comment
searching for the Truth
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:31amMade in China.
Report this comment
RIDEMODELS
Mar. 19, 2013 at 12:50amJust like my underwear…..dannnggiitt..!!!
Report this comment
Frodo RinosBane
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:29amMan, I want to be there with my 12 gauge and shout “PULL!”
Report this comment
Maji
Mar. 18, 2013 at 1:53pmAhh haaha!!
Me too!!
Report this comment
Mil Mom
Mar. 18, 2013 at 3:29pm@Frodo RinosBane
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:29am
Man, I want to be there with my 12 gauge and shout “PULL!”
***
Please Video and post to Youtube, then see that it’s covered by the Blaze.
Report this comment
Navyguy62
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:26amI remember these from when I was in the Navy. We would launch these from our deck and let other ships shoot at them. Then we would go out and recover them.
I remember when they were just deploying the phalanx systems and we launched a pair of these for qualification purposes. The ship with the phalanx system had the wrong settings and when they shot at the targets the system registered a ‘MISS’ on the first sequence so it recycled and blew the drones out of the sky. We were on station for two days trying to recover the debris with very little of it larger than a sheet of paper.
Saying someone messed up is an understatement but it was cool as heck to watch!!!
Report this comment
PlowMan
Mar. 18, 2013 at 1:13pmInteresting story, thanks for posting.
Report this comment
Fenrirsulfr
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:30pmWould have paid a lot for a ticket to see that show!
Report this comment
searching for the Truth
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:13amDidn’t Slim Pickens ride one of these out of Air Force One?
Report this comment
J-M-S
Mar. 18, 2013 at 2:36pmIt was a H-Bomb out of a B-52 over Russia. Movie- Dr. Strangelove.
Report this comment
J-M-S
Mar. 18, 2013 at 2:40pmThe movie was
Dr. Strangelove. He rode a H-Bomb from the bomb bay of a B-52 over it’s target in Russia.
Report this comment
cloudsofwar
Mar. 18, 2013 at 4:40pm@ jms……… cool movie, heil.
Report this comment
integrican
Mar. 18, 2013 at 8:27pm@JMS I vaaazzzz zzinkink ze samme ting……
Report this comment
vlad_lenin
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:12amThat is indeed a BQM-167A from Composite Engineering, Inc (not Northrop). It floated down there from the waters off of Panama City. The Navy doesn’t operate 167As.
Contact Tyndall AFB if you find one and there’s no reward, don’t even ask. Do watch out if you find one! They typically chaff and/or flares onboard that may go off as well as several small explosive devices around the plane.
The target is worth anywhere from about $600k to $1M+ depending on its configuration.
Report this comment
woodyee
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:34amSounds like it’d be more fun blowing it up than turning it in,
Report this comment
eawick
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:58amIt’s a target drone. They are meant to be blown out of the sky. Even old F-4 Phantoms are painted orange and modified to be flown as a drone, just to be shot down. The whole point of this is to destroy items paid with tax dollars. What the really scary thing is, whatever was meant to shoot this drone down, missed…
Report this comment
naughtycal
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:04am250,000 dollar skeet
Report this comment
eawick
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:17am$250,000 is small change in regards to how much the American taxpayer is getting raped… At least this target drone served a beneficial purpose, albeit it an expensive one. Still much better than shrimps on treadmills…
Report this comment
Navyguy62
Mar. 18, 2013 at 3:13pmFYI – They did NOT miss.
The drone has sensors onboard that detect when it has been ‘HIT’. Usually a shot must be within 50 feet to score. At that time the drone falls out of the sky to be recovered by an aicraft or ship. They are designed to simulate enemy aircraft flying between 500kts and MACH 2.
This allows our forces to practice with a target which costs less than an aircraft that would cost millions of dollars to replace… not to mention the pilot flying it.
Of course if all the Liberals would just jump on their brooms we would not even need these…!
Report this comment
proliance
Mar. 18, 2013 at 5:51pmThese drones are reusable.
Report this comment
RIDEMODELS
Mar. 19, 2013 at 12:54amI would love love love to see Nancy Pelosi on her broom aside Finkelstein while an F-18 is in hot pursuit…..now that is Pay Per View…!!!
Report this comment
SocialistSlayer
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:40amWhen I was in the Navy we would go out and practice shooting at these. They are Target Drones that are pulled by other aircraft.
Report this comment
naughtycal
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:06amNot this one this a self propelled drone, notice the jet engine under the hull.
Report this comment
JediKnight
Mar. 18, 2013 at 12:23pmI don’t know if I’d call it self propelled. It has a jet assisted takeoff from rails on a ship. In other words, the jet fires, it flies into the sky, and then they shoot it down. If they miss, it falls when the jet engine stops.
Report this comment
Ghenkis_Khan
Mar. 18, 2013 at 5:31pmActually a rocket to get it off the pad, then the jet will take over after that thus it is self propelled. Very similiar to this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eGcSW8C8SE
Report this comment
Silvertruth
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:33amIf anyone in a boat ever sees this again and can take it in tow and bring it back to shore safely, DO IT. This means the tracking crew lost it and they usually do give a reward for finding it.
That’s a very expensive fish and they will pay to get it back. Besides, when you hoist it up on the dock and have your picture taken next to it, you can have a really great fish story with proof to back it up!
Report this comment
Gargent_Furball
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:35amHa now that is a good Idea. I’d take it home with me. The darn engine can go in a mini jet.
Report this comment
Ollie123
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:00amJust one of thousands of high tech weapons the govt has in their possession, you really don’t believe those are UFO’s flying and spotted around our country lately? US is gone very high tech, and we the people are struggling just to hold on to our .22 hand guns that wouldn’t put a dent in their armor.
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Mar. 18, 2013 at 1:51pmUm, Ollie, target drones ain’t that high tech. You could, for a few hundred bucks, put one together yourself. In the civilian world, we call them jet propelled remote controlled aircraft, and you’ll find them at RC meets across the nation. Scale one up a little and bing, drone.
The government is neither omnipotent, omniscient nor particularly competent. You fear a boogeyman you’ve been told to build up in your own head.
Why you would use a .22 to defend yourself against a drone is beyond me.
Report this comment
Silvertruth
Mar. 18, 2013 at 3:20pmGhost is correct. RC aerial camera units can be had pre-built for under $500, ready to fly.
However, an RC jet turbine is hard to get into under $2,000 unless you find someone getting rid of theirs for cheap. The RC jets usually require some kind of Fire Department notification or permission to fly in heavily regulated areas, if they are allowed to fly at all. They just flat out move… I’ve seen POV jet units but none for photography only, there isn’t much but a blur at the speeds they fly at.
Trying to hit a small RC plane with a .22 would be one heckuva shot.
This craft is just a target drone and not a surveillance one. Yes, they do miss them, but also a single hit in the right spot could bring it down mostly intact. If it was really missed, then the pilot or program is supposed to fly it around for another pass. They can land these things near a ship or shore for refurbishment if they are truly missed altogether.
Report this comment
Leveraction3030
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:10pmBetter yet tow it back and haul it to your local Militia site. It may come in handy when the SHTF. I am sure some good ole boys could at least make these capable of launching while carrying something unpleasant loaded on board. We have a lot of guns and ammo stored and ready across the land. Having some surface to air devices would sure be a nice to have.
Report this comment
Gargent_Furball
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:33amA One time shot for this aircraft. NO wheels to land and engine on the bottom.
Now this little Drone was not cheap.
This is your Tax Dollars at work. 5-10 million got this ?
But what the hell, we have plenty of people to tax.
Report this comment
Stoic one
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:38amPlease go back and READ the story! not just the pictures.
Report this comment
pggarrett
Mar. 18, 2013 at 11:08amIt is captured and re-used over and over. U.S. Fighter Pilots use them so they will have real world experience for air-to-air combat. You can’t just send up two U.S. pilots and let them kill each other…can you? They have been using these types of targets for 40 years.
Report this comment
RIDEMODELS
Mar. 19, 2013 at 1:05amI heard from a kid up near Tyndell that the F22 went up against 8 F-15s and when the F22 went lights out the F-15s were sent back to base very very fast….I hear the F22 is a wicked machine.
They still dog fight off the coast out in the DIAZ zone and MOA’s…..
Report this comment
DougHarvey
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:26amThese are not surveillance drones, they are target drones and the Navy uses them for Anti-Aircraft missile defense training. There used to be a large testing area just north of Puerto Rico; not sure if we are still using that range since we shut down the Base at Roosevelt Roads. They cannot land on a runway; after the individual test, the operator “lands” the drone in the water and a recovery boat comes out to pick it up. They do lose them every once in a while.
Report this comment
jabolen1
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:25amI live in SW Fla and a couple weeks ago we were hearing sonic booms out over the gulf and the military said they were training. Probably from that.
Report this comment
POET
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:13amObama’s testing “Get Away Pods” for Dr. Evil
Report this comment
spirited
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:13amWhatever it is….
the color suggests that it is not supposed to go unnoticed.
Report this comment
Ghenkis_Khan
Mar. 18, 2013 at 5:35pmTo make it easier to find during the recovery operation.
Report this comment
Outlaw_Josey_Wales
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:12amThe Outlaw is buying slighty used drones in good condition, Top Dollar Paid.
Report this comment
jcldwl
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:08amI don’t know why it wouldn’t be legal to keep. It was salvaged at sea. Salvage goes to he who salvages.
Report this comment
truckinwife
Mar. 18, 2013 at 10:02amI see that they are playing with drones again in DC. I think drone hunting season will begin soon.
Report this comment
mapgirl10
Mar. 18, 2013 at 9:58amWow thanks for the heads up! Maybe Rand Paul was giving us the heads up!
Report this comment
trolltrainer
Mar. 18, 2013 at 9:56am“Looking into target drones used by the military, TheBlaze too thinks this could be the case.”
—————————————————————————-
And here I thought you guys at The Blaze weren’t too bright…
Thanks for that superb reporting, I can now rest easy that y’all are on the job…
Report this comment
USAFRetired
Mar. 18, 2013 at 9:56amA Drone Yes, but not the kind I would worry about.
Unless it just ran out of gas before a pilot could hit the target. Then the pilot needs more practice.
Report this comment
starman70
Mar. 18, 2013 at 9:56amThat’s a USAF drone. I bet the desk jockey flying it won’t get a medal for losing it.
Report this comment
OLDBIKEFIXER
Mar. 18, 2013 at 9:55amI would have taken it home and made it into a soap-box-derby racer. Or perhaps mounted it on the roof of my house… it would look great as a weather vane!
Report this comment
RIDEMODELS
Mar. 19, 2013 at 1:00amSweet……or you could make a West Coast County chopper out of it.
Or it would make a great vibrating sex toy for Hillary when Bill is not around, which happens much too often…… :)
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Mar. 18, 2013 at 9:51amLooks like about a half-million of our tax dollars sitting in a puddle to me.
Report this comment
USAFRetired
Mar. 18, 2013 at 9:58amReuseable just like the boosters on the space shuttle. Now they are museum pieces
Report this comment