Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested

Listen to the Buck Sexton Show Live on TheBlaze Radio

Faith

Hillary Clinton Endorses Gay Marriage: ‘Personally and as a Matter of Policy and Law’

Mar. 18, 2013 11:13am Billy Hallowell

Reversing course on her previous stance against same-sex marriage, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has come out in support of gay matrimony. She announced her decision on Monday in a nearly six-minute video that was released by the Human Rights Campaign.

“For America to continue leading in the world, there is work we must do at home,” Clinton said in the clip, citing the need to invest in national security and other domestic needs — and also to live up to ideals associated with the rights of gays and lesbians.

“LGBT Americans are our colleagues, our teachers, our soldiers, our friends, our loved ones — and they are full and equal citizens and deserve the rights of citizenship,” Clinton continued. “That includes marriage.”

Photo Credit: YouTube

Political observers will likely cite the Democratic Party’s shift toward advocating gay marriage for her reversal, with President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and others joining in on affirming their belief that same-sex unions should be legal. Clinton is the latest to join this chorus.

It should also be noted that her embrace of gay marriage would likely be needed before launching interest in a 2016 presidential bid, seeing as her party has so fervently advocated for the cause. Like Obama, who endorsed same-sex marriage leading into the 2012 race, Clinton alluded to an “evolution” of sorts.

“Like so many others my personal views have been shaped over time by people I have known and loved, by my experience representing our nation on the world stage, my devotion to law and human rights and the guiding principles of my faith,” she said. “Marriage, after all, is a fundamental building block of our society. A great joy, and yes, a great responsibility.”

Watch Clinton’s announcement, below:

While questions continue to surround a potential 2016 run, no definitive announcements have been made. This endorsement, though, is sure to continue sparking curiosities about Clinton’s intentions. As Politico notes, her husband, Bill, and daughter, Chelsea, had previously embraced gay marriage.

This is a breaking news story. Stay tuned for updates.

(H/T: Politico)

–

Other Must-Read Stories:

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (249)

eat-more-bacon-USA
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:34am
Well, considering that Hillary has been trapped for decades in an unhappy, loveless marriage to a raging philanderer and known rapist, and taking into account her long history of lesbianism, I can’t say that I’m surprised.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- turkey13
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:56am
  I always knew that Bill Clinton didn’t care if Monica was a guy named Mousie. Just as long as her or he was under his desk! If they were quite and didn’t talk – Bill wouldn’t have known if they were male or female.
  
  Report this comment
- LFreeman
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:07pm
  I wish there was a like button for this comment.
  
  Report this comment
- rickc34
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:23pm
  God says no, but evil people say yes. As for me and my house we will serve the Lord.
  
  Report this comment
- SquidVetOhio
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:30pm
  Hillary was against gay-marriage? I was a little surprised an obvious lesbian Democrat was ever against it. Oh, that must have been back when it was politically expedient.
  
  Report this comment
- MIBUGNU2
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:38pm
  ” It Just Doesn’t Matter” ….Just another POS “Evolving”
  to get a couple of votes…Career Politicians are disgusting.
- HarryPotter
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:46pm
  I’m pretty sure she was already for gay marriage, but I’m glad to see that she is continuing her support for equality.
  
  Report this comment
- TEXASGRANNY73
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:47pm
  Can you prove what you wrote? Disgusting. I do not like Hillary Clinton, a liberal progressive, not one bit, but writing lies is as despicable as the progressives are. Prove it. You just make the right look stupid with your thinking.
  
  Report this comment
- bannedfromCNN
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 1:07pm
  Got to hand it to Ms. Clinton for a good bit of ‘out of the box’ thinking.
  
  Report this comment
- rangerskippy
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 1:18pm
  Notice that Hillary failed to mention that gays are 2.5% of the population, but they have 64% of the nation’s syphilis, they made up 57% of new HIV cases last year, and they did 1/3 of the nation’s child molestations.
  
  Hillary did not talk about their highest sucide rates, or their above average drug and alcohol abuse rates.
  
  Hillary did not bring up the fact that in the past, when super power nations accept homosexuality as normal, they soon after fall.
  
  Homosexuality, just like rape, child molestation, bestiality, swinging…. is a sexual deviance.
  
  God says homosexuality is evil (Lev 18 22, Romans chapter one), science shows it to be unhealthy, crime statistics shows them to be predators.
  
  Hillary and Obama have a moral compass that is aligned with Madonna and lady Ga Ga, by is contrary to the founding fathers.
  
  Report this comment
- MIBUGNU2
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 1:23pm
  @LFreeman
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:07pm
  I wish there was a like button for this comment.
  
  There’s one on the HUF-PO site !!
  
  Report this comment
- Duke One
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 1:29pm
  Romans 1:16-32
  
  Report this comment
- TEXASGRANNY73
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 1:37pm
  @RangerSkippy Where did you find these figures? Publish and I will come back and check them later.
  
  Report this comment
- rangerskippy
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 1:46pm
  Texas granny
  
  Uniform Crime Reports, Center for Disease Control, World History Book, and the Bible.
  
  Read, and enlighten yourself
- formidable_foe
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 2:14pm
  Great…. I’ll add it to my list of things associated with Hillary Clinton that are nauseating.
  
  Report this comment
- nrse2go
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 2:26pm
  Add your comments
  
  Report this comment
- nrse2go
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 2:29pm
  Maybe so, but it looks like she is rested and starting her campaign for 2016 as well! Game on!!
  
  Report this comment
- HarryPotter
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 2:54pm
  TexasGranny:
  
  Rangerskippy has the same post that he copies over and over again. While he has a couple relatively accurate, if exaggerated figures, he is also spouting logical fallacies and lies no matter how many times and places he is refuted. The part about world history shows his remarkable ignorance on the subject. Sexuality has not even been a factor in any nation’s downfall. One could just as easily claim that every nation that has embraced “traditional” marriage or Christianity has fallen. The STD statistics are exaggerated and misleading. Sure, gay men have higher rates of HIV, but straight men have higher rates of Chlamydia and other diseases. This argument is pointless. Straight men also rape and abuse children most, and there is a big difference between homosexual and pedophile, which he does not seem to understand. Besides, you don’t need to be a gay man to molest a boy. He also fails to realize that it is people like him that cause the high rates of depression and suicide among LGBT youth and young adults. When you try to change someone, and tell them that they are evil degenerates, and that a basic part of them is against nature and God, this will happen. It is sad. And God does not hate homosexuals, at least no more than he hates people who eat shellfish, which is mentioned mere verses from the passage he cited. The truth is that there is nothing wrong with being gay, and equality is coming despite his efforts and ignorance.
  
  Report this comment
- ComradeJ
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 3:30pm
  Thanks for the stats Ranger
  
  Report this comment
- jakartaman
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 3:39pm
  Hilary reeks of lesbian – no surprise – all these kooks are coming out now that Socialism and the war on God is in full bloom.
  
  Report this comment
- formidable_foe
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 3:40pm
  Potter,
  
  Since you’re seemingly a homosexual activist, it is no surprise that you say there’s nothing wrong with it. Step out of the Seinfeld episode and understand that even people who accept and tolerate homosexuality realize that there are things wrong with it.
  
  However, the worst and foolish of your comments is blaming Rangerskippy “and people like him” for causing LGBT youth suicide. This is absurd. Someone who is suicidal has a mental illness, and the lack of acceptance and criticism from a few don’t cause this. I might add though that it is interesting how a group of people who have chosen an immoral lifestyle would end up having a higher rate of what is considered an even greater morally depraved behavior like suicide.
  
  How about holding the LGBT youth who kill themselves personally responsible like every other person who commits suicide? Remember the quote from one of your famous liberal icons Eleanor Roosevelt: “No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.”
  
  Report this comment
- Centurian
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 4:05pm
  @harrypotter,
  
  Just like you to argue against numbers. Just say a few generalities and state that the numbers are the same ol’ numbers that keep getting reported.
  
  Fact is fact.
  
  If you don’t want to argue on that level, then you simply attack the person who posted. What a “liberal” thing to do…
  
  As for the rest of your comment, nations build up strong, go through a period of stability, then begin a slide into decay. Please check your history. A good example of where moral decay destroyed a nation would be Rome. By its downfall, people were more concerned with free government food and entertainment (thus the adage, “bread and circuses”.)
  
  But please, don’t let me get in the way of your postings. The last thing I am sure that you want is fact or reality…
  
  Report this comment
- HarryPotter
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 4:11pm
  Formidable:
  
  First, I would not call myself an activist. I am just a gay man, trying to she’d some light on the issue here, where it is desperately needed. Second, there is nothing wrong with being gay. You may not like it, you may find it icky. That’s fine! No one is telling you to be gay! But if someone has a physical attraction to their own gender that they neither chose not control, why should they not be with someone they love? Just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean there is anything wrong with it.
  
  And you are somewhat correct, yet horribly cruel and offensive. Yes, people do control their own lives, and are not “forced” into suicide. But try to see it from their view. A teen, trying to come to terms with their sexuality, which they have no control over, comes out to his family. His family, the people who raised him and are closer to him than anyone else, tell him he is an abomination, or try to change him, when he knows he cannot change. He is made fun of incessantly at school and via technology like text messages and Facebook. He cannot get away from it. How would you feel? Now remember that this is a teenager, that point in life when emotions and problems are greatly magnified. A flunked test feels like the end of the world. Your family, friends and classmates shun you or treat you like a degenerate. This is why gay people have suicide and depression problems. And by ignoring this, you are being remarkably cold to people in great need of support.
  
  Report this comment
- HarryPotter
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 4:20pm
  Centurian:
  
  I never denied the statistics, I just showed why they were illogical and irrevalent. Fact is fact. Gays are every bit as normal as straight people, and there is no logical argument to deny them equal rights. I have ignored nothing, but you and others on here keep ignoring the facts that I post. I may not always cite specific numbers, but frankly the numbers rangerskippy posts are exaggerated, irrevalent, or outright false anyway.
  
  As for history, I actually have a masters degree in ancient history, so I believe I know more on the subject than anyone else here. In Rome, bread and circuses were a way of controlling the masses; a way of winning easy popularity. Absolutely nothing to do with homosexuality. And from Rome’s founding there were male sex slaves, male prostitutes, and other forms of male-male sex. This was rather constant throughout its history. Completely unrelated to the concept of morality at the time. Not that any concept of morality had any relation to the fall of Rome anyway…. Perhaps you need to reexamine your history.
  
  Report this comment
- ComradeJ
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 5:04pm
  Ranger, is this the study you referenced?
  
  http://www.familyresearchinst.org/2008/12/homosexual-child-molestations-by-foster-parents-illinois-1997-2002/
  
  In this one homosexuals accounted for 53% of all sexual abuses on CHILDREN. Over half of all sexual predator attacks in foster families were committed by a minority that is not even 3% of the general population. But for liberals, this is apparently “normal”.
  
  And they are claiming it’s for equality? Wow!
  
  Report this comment
- BOKCHOY
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 5:52pm
  As our new Pope Francis remarked: “”At stake is the identity and survival of the family: father, mother and children. At stake are the lives of many children who will be discriminated against in advance, and deprived of their human development given by a father and a mother and willed by God. At stake is the total rejection of God’s law engraved in our hearts.”
  
  “Let’s not be naive, we’re not talking about a simple political battle; it is a destructive pretension against the plan of God. We are not talking about a mere bill, but rather a machination of the Father of Lies that seeks to confuse and deceive the children of God.”
  
  People like the Clintons, Obama, Biden et. al. are nothing but demagogues who have decided their transitioning to accepting redefinition of marriage by using their usurped power to even have the guts to shove this down the throats of everyone else is outrageous and truly disgusting. These traitors set on establishing a Socialistic Dictatorship shows who and what they are “TRASH AND NOTHING MORE OR LESS” Their pious and fake way of deceiving everyone deserves removal from office.
  
  Report this comment
- formidable_foe
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 5:55pm
  Potter,
  
  Since you have a Master’s Degree in Ancient Hx, perhaps you can tell us what successful and sustaining culture(s) existed where homosexuality was considered by the majority of the population to be a normal, non-perverted, morally acceptable behavior on equal par in every respect with heterosexuality, e.g., equal number practicing it, homosexuals enjoyed equal social status to heterosexuals, etc.
  
  With your orientation being what it is, I’m sure you had an interest in looking for such a culture/society.
  
  Report this comment
- rangerskippy
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 6:10pm
  harrypotter
  
  take a statistics class, or research methods, and discover the meaning of statistical signifance.
  
  When less than 5% of the population has over 50% of a disease, we call that significant.
  
  the only STDs that gay men do not lead in, are the ones that are generally not passed on by gay sex.
  
  Once again, they are 2.5% of the population (Supreme Court agrees), and they have 64% of the nations syphilis, over 50% of the HIV, and they did over 1/3 of the child molestations.
  
  Two years ago (prior to ending of DADT), the number one way that commanders found out a soldier was gay, was not by them coming out of the closet. The way they were found out, is because they have a propensity to get younger soldiers drunk, then rape them.
  
  Report this comment
- A_CALL_TO_CONSCIENCE
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 7:12pm
  “I believe marriage should be between a single man and a single woman, but the survival of my faith’s sacrament doesn’t depend upon the coercive power of the state. Reform efforts in DC should be directed to make the tax code and other federal laws neutral, so they don’t mention marriage at all.”
  
  Stop trying to use the state to enforce a form of marriage.
  
  Report this comment
- YankeeDelta68
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 7:25pm
  good to see harry pohead is out of the closet today. must be a ****-sexual can only comment on this type of subject, its to bad that spreading a bad diease(aids) is social good.
  
  Report this comment
- YankeeDelta68
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 7:26pm
  rangerskippy is right!!!
  
  Report this comment
- YankeeDelta68
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 7:28pm
  Is it a right of citizenship I dont think so!! HarryPopper
  
  Report this comment
- HarryPotter
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 7:45pm
  comeradej:
  Any study done by the family research inst has about the same amount of facts and trustworthiness as the old tobacco research inst which was run by the big tobacco companies. That is what happened when you start with a biased answer and try to find the means to it.
  
  bokchoy:
  How will man-woman marriages be harmed by gay marriage? How will children be harmed? You won’t be made to divorce, your children won’t be thrown into a gay household, but those in loving relationships wanting to marry will be able to, and children needing adopting from loving parents will find a home.
  
  Formiddable:
  Well you have to understand that ancient societies did not have the concept of gay or straight like we do today. That only came about in the Middle Ages. There was only sex. And in Rome, Greece, Babylon, Egypt, Persia, and others, men almost universally married women, but still had sex with other men, other women, and even children. Women of status were the only ones where extra sex was taboo, because they might conceive, and men wanted to keep their lineage pure, but many noble women still slept around. So, in ALL of these societies, male-male sex was perfectly permissible, and not really viewed as different from male-female sex. However, none of this has any real relevance to today. We should not base our modern laws on ancient protocols. Look at slavery or women’s rights. I was just showing that no nation has ever fallen due to homosexuality.
  
  Report this comment
- HarryPotter
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 7:57pm
  Rangerskipy:
  
  Again, you call gays 2.5%, and 5% in your post. You cannot measure this statistic! I have been over this several times now! But yes, it is notable that homosexuals have such a high rate of HIV. This is due to the lining of the anus being thinner than the vagin* and more readily absorbing the virus. But so what? This does not mean anything as to the morality or safety of homosexuality. Men as compared with women make up around 98% of rapists. This is also a huge over representation. What should we infer from this, that all men are evil degenerates?
  
  I am not sure where you heard that gem about the military, but I have seen many of the these case files, and that is outright false. Most were found out through emails that were spied upon, or someone catching them in the bedroom. Again, here they were keeping it quiet, to themselves, and someone else forcibly outed them and they were kicked out.
  
  I’m not sure what you have personally against gay people, but I can assure you that we are every bit as normal and moral as our straight counterparts. It wouldn’t matter if we had 100% of all HIV cases, that would make no difference, and be no reason why a loving gay couple should not be together. If you find what we do icky, fine! Don’t sleep with a man! Frankly, we find what you do in the bedroom rater icky, too. Just don’t deny us equality.
  
  Report this comment
- dmerwin
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 8:35pm
  And now the campaign begins….
  
  Report this comment
- rangerskippy
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 9:23pm
  harry
  
  You live an evil and sick lifestyle. There is nothing “gay” about it.
  
  Biologically it is not natural, nor is it healthy. Not only is there the rampant disease, there is also the gay bowel syndrome, hemorrhoid issues, and the rate in which homosexuals change partners, and the rate lesbians assault each other is a testament to the wickedness.
  
  the God of the Bible does not mince words in the book of Romans, were we are told that partake in your evil lifestyle are subject to becoming reprobates, where you mind is so seared with evil, that you no longer know right from wrong.
  
  Fear not though, DOMA will get repealed, and gays will get to wed in every state. Following that, the gays will push to shut down “hate speech”, and prevent pastors from preaching Lev 18:22, Romans Chapter 1….. They will get the government to shut down private schools and home schooling, and begin to arrest anyone who speaks Bible truth. Next will come lowering the age of consent, so the 30 year old men can start having sex with the 12 year old boys.
  
  America is in a rapid downhill spiral. Homosexuality is now being accepted as normal, the economy is falling apart, and wickedness is flourishing, and good is getting called bad. America is turning her back on Israel
  
  In a very short while, America (just like Rome) will cease to exist.
  
  Report this comment
- formidable_foe
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 10:47pm
  Potter,
  
  I agree that we shouldn’t model our current society on what was permitted in ancient cultures, and I also agree that no nation has fallen EXCLUSIVELY due to homosexuality.
  
  However, I cannot agree with you that in “ALL of these (ancient) societies, male-male sex was perfectly permissible, and not really viewed as different from male-female sex.” I also cannot agree that the concepts of gay & straight didn’t exist before the Middle Ages. You are ignoring other pre-Middle Age texts which clearly refer to and speak out against homosexuality, namely the Bible.
  
  Report this comment
- HarryPotter
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:11pm
  Rangerskippy:
  
  Your comments are always good for a laugh. I hope you realize that all the arguments you made could also be made against heterosexuals as well, but for the moment, I will stick to showing you why what you said was so nonsensical.
  
  Biologically anal sex (I assume that is what you are referring to, despite the fact tat straight couples enjoy this as well, while not all gay men do) is perfectly natural and healthy. Hundreds of different species exhibit this behavior, and it has been around wit humanity since humanity has existed. And sure, diseases can be passed through anal sex, but also through straight sex, blood transfusions, giving birth, etc. Again, this argument is irrelevant. And for the record, I am in a monogamous relationship and have never been on either side of abuse, so why am I living in wickedness? Straight couples do that too, and have much higher rates of rape and child abuse.
  
  God did not write the Bible, it was written by man. Even if God was whispering in the writers’ ears, man held the pen, so the words are not infallible, and not the words of God. Besides, the Bible speaks of male-male sex in the same language as eating shellfish. I hope you don’t do that.
  
  And your slippery slope arguments about what will come next are by definition fallacious arguments. Look up the term. Homosexuality IS natural, it IS normal, and it IS here to stay. No matter how much you post misleading and irrelevant statistics.
  
  Report this comment
- HarryPotter
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:20pm
  Formidable:
  
  Sigh….
  
  You can believe whatever you want, but I promise you, I have studied this period extensively. Every word I wrote was historically accurate. The Bible speaks of men laying with men, and men abandoning their use of women, but it says nothing about homosexuality. If your version specifically says “homosexuality” then it is not properly translating something. Even words like “sodomy” are not adequately translated, that term has meant many things to many different societies. This is why I am not overly fond of Biblical quoting, something is always mistranslated or misunderstood. There have been so many different translations by so many people wit so many different agendas, it is impossible to uncover the original meaning. Besides, the Bible was written by man, and is not the infallible word of God.
  
  Bottom line, everything I posted above is accurate, whether you believe it or not. Feel free to do some research.
  
  Report this comment
- Right2Representation
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:29pm
  Harry Potter
  I thought you killed trolls, but turns out you are one. You are so funny, “you don’t have to be a gay man to molest a boy”! Man, that is hilarious. How many times has it happened that a man molests a BOY and it is not a homosexual act? HaHaHa! Just hilarious. A veteran troll.
  
  Troll List:
  VerseofReason
  HarryPotter
  
  Report this comment
- HarryPotter
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:55pm
  Right:
  
  Clearly you are uninformed. As a young wizard attending Hogwarts School, I never actually killed a troll, but I did assist in knocking one unconscious on Halloween my first year.
  
  But to your point: If a man molests a child, it is not a homosexual or heterosexual act, it is a pedophile act. Being heterosexual means you are attracted to someone of the opposite gender, being homosexual means you are attracted to someone of your own gender, and being a pedophile means you are attracted to children. You can argue that gay pedophiles are attracted to boys and straight pedophiles are attracted to girls, but most pedophiles will seek out both genders at some point. So this is clearly a different category. And there is also a big difference between acts and attraction. I could physically have sex with a woman, but that wouldn’t make me straight, and it wouldn’t change the fact that I am attracted to men. These are important differences you need to understand.
  
  Report this comment
- flysail
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 1:58am
  That’s how she met Bill….they were both dating the same woman.
  
  Report this comment
- rangerskippy
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 8:07am
  men that molest boys, are homosexual. the Baron Von Stuben was gay, Jerry Sandusky was gay. Sex between one male, to another, is homosexual.
  
  The food restrictions of eathing sell fish were for the children of Israel, and they were lifeted int he NT. Homosexuality was declared an abomination in the OT, and in the NT, it as called unnatural, and leads to being a reprobate (Romans Chapter 1)
  
  Go watch a gay parade, then come back and tell me what you see is natural. Homosexuals recruit children. The National Man Boy Love Association is a groupd of gay men that want to have sex with boys.
  
  Report this comment
- HarryPotter
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 9:00am
  Rangerskippy:
  
  See my above comments to Right about the concept of homosexuality and pedophilia. There are a few key points here that you are missing. As for the Bible, if you want to pick and choose which verses to follow, while trying to justify why you ignore some, feel free. There are plenty of other verses which discuss owning slaves, repressing or owning wives, and other arbitrary rules and restrictions which are ignored today. But all of this is irrelevant because the Bible is not the word of God. Man held the pen, and even if God was whispering in their ears, the words still came from men, and so are fallible and unreliable. The message of the Bible is love, but people like you will ignore that over a few obscure passages that you twist to support discrimination and your own bigotry. And I’m gay, I know what goes on at gay pride parades, and yes, it is all natural. There is plenty of lewd behavior and skimpy clothing, but if you don’t want to see that, don’t go to the parade! Turn off your tv! No one is forcing you to watch. And finally, gays do not recruit children. That is actually impossible since no one can choose their sexual orientation. Gay people and straight people have been trying to keep children informed and tell them the truth, however. They have been telling kids that there is nothing wrong with being gay, some boys just love other boys, and some girls love other girls. That’s the truth.
  
  Report this comment
- A_CALL_TO_CONSCIENCE
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 11:12am
  @HARRYPOTTER
  
  While I stand by gay marriage in the legal aspect, I don’t morally. To say that anal sex is natural and healthy is a bit silly. Now, if you mean its “natural” in the sense some people have a ‘natural’ desire to do it then sure, it is. However, if you mean that its ‘natural’ in that it’s perfectly fine…I would disagree.
  
  Simply because something is “natural” (assuming anal sex is) doesn’t mean it is right. Biologically it is not natural because naturally the rectum is not meant to be used for sex. As RANGERSKIPPY pointed out, there are many medical issues that can occur, and most likely will due to AS.
  
  Oh, and pointing to animals to somehow justify homosexuality or anal sex as “natural” does not hold any weight because 1. We are not animals and have a sense of morality. 2. There are other things animals do that we wouldn’t do such as licking ourselves to clean, eating each other.
  
  Report this comment
- HarryPotter
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 11:26am
  Call:
  
  I am glad you recognize that all people deserve equal rights. But I am not sure why you think anal sex is wrong. What is really different about it than vagin*l sex? Sure, you could say that the anus is an output, and not meant for sex. I could say the same thing about the vagin*. It was meant as an output for babies, and not meant for sex. And sure, you can catch diseases through anal sex and rarely it can lead to other problems, but this is all also true with vagin*l sex.
  
  I do however agree with what you said about animals. My argument with homosexuality in animals was to show that it is also found in nature, which is the primary definition of natural. But I could also have said that glasses and toothpaste are unnatural too. We are more than just animals, we have higher abilities for rational thought. And I have yet to find a rational thought against homosexuality in any form.
  
  Report this comment
- A_CALL_TO_CONSCIENCE
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 11:54am
  @HARRYPOTTER
  
  I think it is up to each person to decide what they want to do behind closed doors. The morality of anal sex is something you could debate I guess. I was mainly referring to homosexuality and that anal sex is something I would not recommend anyone do (gay or straight), because of health reasons.
  
  The Vagin a was biologically meant to have a peni s inside it, which naturally leads to pregnancy. So, I don’t’ think you could really say the Vagin a wasn’t meant for sex since that’s how babies are made.
  
  “My argument with homosexuality in animals was to show that it is also found in nature, which is the primary definition of natural.”
  
  That’s what I figured you meant by natural. By that yes, you could say toothpaste and glasses are unnatural, that’s why I mentioned something being natural isn’t automatically right or wrong.
  
  Report this comment
- HarryPotter
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 12:31pm
  Call:
  
  I think we are mostly on the same page, but again, sure there are health risks with anal sex, as there are with vagin*l sex. This is why one should not have sex until they are truly ready, are prepared for the possible consequences, and practice safe sex. To encourage people not to have anal sex would be like saying to never drink soda, or never use a hammer. Or to never have sex at all. As long as you are ready, and smart about it, there is nothing wrong with it.
  
  Report this comment
- A_CALL_TO_CONSCIENCE
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 1:21pm
  @HARRYPOTTER
  
  I think so to.
  
  The reason I wouldn’t encourage anyone to is that the health risks are higher with AS; in the same way I wouldn’t encourage anyone to have multiple parents because that has higher health risks. No matter what kind of sex, it is up to each person to decide if they want to take that risk.
  
  Report this comment
Sargeking
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:33am
Somehow with another new outrage each and everyday from the Left the low information people still admire the leaders of the Dem party. No political party in our history has done more to hurt Black Americans. The Ku Klux Klan was an invention of the Democratic Party. “Sheets” Byrd was a former Grand Dragon of the Klan. The so-called “War on Poverty” has done more to enslave and destroy the Black family than any other demonic policy from the Left and yet the “low information people” live and breathe every lie from the Dems. When will this ignorance and madness end?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- techengineer11
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:42am
  Sargeking: Don’t even go there.
  
  Republicans are jumping onto the bandwagon as well..
  
  Who would hav ever thought that in 2013 sodomy and sexual perversion would be the norm in the good ole USA. I wonder what our Puritan forefathers would have thought? I wonder if they’d even be able to exist in America today?
  
  Gotta love it. I see a very bright future America?
  
  Get involved at the local level, know your neigbors mayor and police force and hold on tight. things are moving fast.
  
  There’s a reason the DHS just bought almost 3k personnel carriers and approximatly 2billion rounds of ammo and you just maybe that reason. ;)
  
  Goodluck. But this is what happens when you turn your country over to an alien race because you’re too busy to get involved..
  
  I’m sure your time is very valuable.. Someone else will take care of the politics and make the decisions for us. :)
  
  Report this comment
- Blacktooth
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:44am
  What she is really saying;
  
  Our Creator God does not know what he is talking about and she, sitting there all self righteously, is so perfect and she knows better.
  
  Report this comment
- catty
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:50am
  try to stay on topic
  
  Report this comment
- repairsea
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:51am
  Very true. There are US state where age of consent of for males and female under the age of 18. Idaho and Hawaii it is 14. DC is 15. This means that pedophiles can legally rape and marry their young grooms and brides and divorce them when they are no longer youthful. The pedophile heterosexuals have done this for years and now the gay and lesbian pedophiles will have their equal rights, too, under the guise of gay marriage. Again, notice the age of consent in Washington, DC is 15.
  
  Report this comment
- Sargeking
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:58am
  TECH: Good points, especially on the abject Reps. I’m leaning away from the Republican Party per se and “leaning” toward a Constitutional Party, consisting of Conservative/Libertarians; rejecting the RINOS (and we know full well who they are). I also concur that we have lost nearly total control of our borders and I would add that the giant influx from Islam is accompanied by the dictates of Sharia Law. That is all wrong for a Representative Republic. I truly wish that I could slam the door on all of them!
  
  Report this comment
- TEXASGRANNY73
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:37pm
  @SargeKing I like what you wrote.
  
  Report this comment
- MIBUGNU2
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:43pm
  @Sargeking
  
  When they take away all those Bama-Fo’s !!!
  
  Report this comment
- Sgt_Rock
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 1:09pm
  SARGEKING – You might be interested in knowing that the Southern Poverty Law Center has the Constitutional Party on their far right watch list…so they must be doing something right.
  
  REPAIRSEA – Washington State’s age of consent is 16 and has one of the highest populations of sexual predators in the nation. They have also done away with the statutory rape laws, opting instead for laws that use an age difference as a guide. It’s a crock. It just makes it easier for pedophiles to operate with in their target age group.
  
  Report this comment
- techengineer11
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 3:42pm
  Sargeking: I would just say there’s no reason to give up on the Republican Party.
  
  The way things are set up it would take decades to get a 3rd party going on and by the time they pass Ammensty there will be no point in a 3rd party anyway.
  
  The Repbulcian party has a base of about 75% of very conservative folks.. It is up to each of us to take this party back and throw the RINOs out.. we must run the party. The establishment got away with a cram down in the last election.. It was sickening but we must turn it around. We took back our local Republican Party this year and it was a blast.
  
  Anyway we can’t afford to give up the Republican party… Why should we allow a small minority of non social conservatives take the party away from us? We have the #s they just have the microphones.
  
  Report this comment
- TheGrtDcptn
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 6:55pm
  ‘I wonder what our Puritan forefathers would have thought?’
  
  Our Puritan forefathers would have put an end to it long ago…No ifs, ands, or buts (ahem) about it…
  
  Report this comment
Locked
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:33am
Ladies and gents, Hillary Clinton: expert on successful marriages.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- naughtycal
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:36am
  Exactly
  
  Report this comment
- rickc34
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:21pm
  Locked: now that’s funny :-D
  
  Report this comment
- TEXASGRANNY73
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:31pm
  You forgot she is an expert on child care, abortion, human rights in our country, human rights in all countries, an expert in economics in all countries, an expert on women’s rights, an expert on birth control, an expert on health care pre Obamacare, an expert on damn near anything involved in politics, an expert at diplomacy, an expert in race relations, an expert in religion (yes, she is. She stayed in many black churches preaching to her choir, whoops, their choirs, hatred of those she deemed responsible for their problems (she had nothing to do with it, of course, not liberal progressive Hillary. I do not agree with her on any of her expert-tation nor gay marriage. But, I am sick and tired of the hate preached on the Blaze every time gay anything is mentioned. The hate of fellow Americans is no different than the hate that Hillary stirs. This is all about Hillary and nothing to do with gay anything. More stirring the pot of radicalism.
  
  Report this comment
- bannedfromCNN
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 1:08pm
  She’s all over this, lickety-split.
  
  Report this comment
- iampraying4u
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 2:01pm
  just to get a few votes she goes on the nasty side
  
  Report this comment
JSherrillj
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:32am
It is so brave of democrats to take such a strong support of gay marriage while not one of them has the B**ls to introduce a bill repealing DOMA.. Just talk and no action. Not hard to take a strong stand when no one is counting how you vote. No one cares what Hillary Clinton thinks anyhow. Like she said in regards to four dead Americans in Bengazi, “what does it really matter”

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
spirited
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:31am
Should anything Hillary Clinton says really matter “at this point”?

>Pray Benghazi is to Obama and his “folks” (including Hillary) what tax evasion was to Al Capone.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- SimpleTruths
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:05pm
  Or Iran/Contra was to Reagan/Ollie North? Like that?
  
  Report this comment
- spirited
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:35pm
  No.
  
  >Just like Tax Evasion was to Al Capone. –clink
  
  Report this comment
- iampraying4u
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 2:08pm
  Do you notice the demorats get on the nasty side
  
  Report this comment
searching for the Truth
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:29am
Does this mean they want us to must get ” behind ” them?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- searching for the Truth
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:34am
  Does this mean they we must get ” behind” them?
  
  Report this comment
- oneshiner
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 1:18pm
  Old news, but seems to be surfacing again. Eye opening and jaw dropping info.
  
  http://www.handpen.com/Bio/clintonbodycount.htm
  
  Report this comment
- spirited
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 1:29pm
  Lead from behind
  
  Report this comment
willingtoupe
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:28am
I see it coming, 2016! Can’t wait! We’re taking Texas ( or making it purple ) and sending former first ladies back to the White House again!

Clinton/Obama 2016!

YAY!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- TEXASGRANNY73
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:55pm
  Nope.
  
  Report this comment
- trigger
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 1:29pm
  its a shame that she cared so little about the homosexual ambassador in Benghazi.
  
  Report this comment
- slr4528
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 1:49pm
  So Hillary’s major issue is gay marriage…..she is not exactly an expert on marriage. So all women are suppose to vote for Hillary because she is a girl who slept her way to the top…ha ha ha….Hillary is a joke and a woman would have to be a fool to vote for the woman who is responsible for the expansion of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Middle East. Who knows, maybe Hillary is getting tired of her hideous pant suits and would like to sport a flowing Burqa. I can’t believe that the so called women’s rights groups aren’t up in arms over the expansion of the Muslim Brotherhood.
  
  Report this comment
- ComradeJ
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 3:24pm
  As in Bill/Obama or Hillary/Michelle?
  
  Why stop there, why not go after the next progressive train stop – bestiality vote. Then we could really have a real donkey in the WH.
  
  Report this comment
welovetheUSA
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:28am
This fool thinks she is going to be our next president….no way. Obama will destroy the democrats…besides you democrats need a republican to blame for this mess you have created.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
michael48
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:28am
of value…to no one…next

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Conservative New Yorker
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:28am
And so, the expected re- invention of Hillary, right on cuein time for 2016.

“Benghazi? Who is Ben Ghazi??”…

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- PilgrimStuckInBizarroWorld
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:35am
  Truth! What difference does it make?
  
  Report this comment
Sharon Rose
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:27am
Making her platform for 2016

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Dushman Kush
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:27am
This viperous harridan actually thinks she may be President one day…..That will never happen. All of the Comrades know she is a “pro-democracy” goofball, not unlike the “pro-democracy” goofballs Mother Russia is expelling. Long Live the Communist International !!!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- firearm
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:28pm
  DUSH, was that some kind of Russian humor?
  
  Report this comment
stopprintn
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:25am
And yet another Prog is evolving, ok!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
IMCHRISTIAN
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:25am
I am more afraid to disobey Gods laws and his gift of life. I would not abandon my moral and ethics. Why did she reverse her opinion if for the wrong reason she is not going to be an honest person and does not deserve a future in more politics as we have had enough of lies and don’t need to have another politician that just changes mind for benefit of more votes.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
biohazard23
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:25am
Hillary supports gay marriage? What difference, at this point, does it make? :)

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
RightUnite
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:22am
Of course she would, being the closet carpet muncher that she is….

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- DoseofReality
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:31am
  There is the maturity Ive come to expect from this site – i swear you guys are like a bunch of adolescent boys
  
  Report this comment
- IndyGuy
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:36am
  Hey dose….If you expect it then why do you return??? Are you an adolescent boy???
  
  Report this comment
- TEXASGRANNY73
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 1:41pm
  @DoseofReality Sorry-it was you I was defending. Made a mistake. So read what I wrote to RightUnite. Or whoever. Laughing.
  
  Report this comment
- IndyGuy
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 3:58pm
  @TEXASGRANNY73…I’m sorry…did you have something intelligent to say??? Because you missed the mark by a mile…
  
  Report this comment
- MistyMountainGranny
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 12:00am
  @texasgranny -And here you are…. admitting u it makes you better to belittle others… There is no place on this site for such behavior. Granny? U r acting like your 12. This site is a place for all to safely share our views. Not to be belittled by anyone….
  
  Report this comment
Chromo200
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:22am
so when 73% of the country did not want Obamacare we were ignored and told we don’t know anything, but now that 54% support gay marriage it is OK.

I wonder when Hillary will come out of the closet and parade her partner.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
GONE_SOVEREIGN
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:21am
AND…..wait for it….it’s all Bush’s fault!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- MN NICE
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:13pm
  Not anymore… Sounds to me, Hillary likes bush…
  
  Report this comment
searching for the Truth
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:21am
It’s a great thunking sound.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Sargeking
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:19am
She can also fly backwards on a witches broom, so of course she “reversed” her position. For her next trick….

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
woodyee
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:18am
No surprise coming from that butch…

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
AlansTigg
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:17am
OMG I can’t believe she just did that!!! I’m in such shock I believe I need to go home now and try to cope with this…who would ever think she’d change opinions for political gain….oh I’m so disillusioned now

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Bonnieblue2A
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:16am
How long before the Hildabeast breaks down the closet door to come out?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- crackerone
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:57am
  I know who will wear the “pantsuit” in that relationship.
  
  Report this comment
IndyGuy
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:16am
“Hillary Clinton Endorses Gay Marriage”……..Of course she does…She’s a lesbian and she’s married…

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- oneshiner
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:40am
  Most of ‘em hide behind something. No wonder billy-boy had flings with anything that wore lipstick. People who choose to be gay, it’s their business (don’t flaunt it on the rest of us) but making this Nation accept them in a legal marriage is a total sham and unacceptable. Why do you expect us to accept you as a married couple? Get a life and live your shame privately, not publicly.
  
  Report this comment
Micmac
Posted on March 18, 2013 at 11:16am
As Rome burns…

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- normalmom
  Posted on March 18, 2013 at 12:48pm
  Exactly the direction we are going sits right there in history. Rome a democracy people started to accept anything and voting in the person who gave them what they want not need then it falls and turns into a dictatorship.
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.