Which conservative did Piers Morgan ban from his show?

Politics

Fein-Stymied: Assault Weapons Ban Won’t Even Make It Into Final Gun Control Bill

Mar. 19, 2013 2:48pm Jonathon M. Seidl

Assault Weapons Ban Wont be in Final Gun Control Bill

Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. speaks with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, March 5, 2013. Credit: AP

WASHINGTON (TheBlaze/AP) — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has decided that a proposed assault weapons ban won’t be part of a gun control bill the Senate plans to debate next month, the sponsor of the ban said Tuesday, a decision that means the ban stands little chance of survival.

Instead, Sen. Dianne Feinstein said she will be able to offer her ban on the military-style firearms as an amendment. Feinstein is all but certain to need 60 votes from the 100-member Senate to prevail, but she faces solid Republican opposition and likely defections from some moderate Democrats.

As The Atlantic puts it, “offering the assault weapons ban as an amendment means it would require its own vote — which would almost certainly fail.”

“I very much regret it,” Feinstein, D-Calif., told reporters of Reid’s decision. “I tried my best.”

Feinstein, an author of the 1994 assault weapons ban that expired after a decade, said that Reid, D-Nev., told her of the decision on Monday.

There are 53 Democrats in the Senate, plus two independents who usually vote with them. And as The Atlantic points out via Gallup, support for a measure such as Feinstein’s has waned:

Support for a ban on so-called “assault weapons” has waned. (Gallup via The Atlantic)

An assault-type weapon was used in the December massacre at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn., that revived gun control as a top issue in Washington. Banning those firearms was among the proposals President Barack Obama made in January in response to those slayings.

The assault weapons ban was the most controversial of the major proposals to restrict guns that have been advanced by Obama and Senate Democrats. Because of that, it had been expected that the assault weapons measure would be left out of the initial package the Senate considers, with Democrats hoping the Senate could therefore amass the strongest possible vote for the overall legislation.

Having a separate vote on assault weapons might free moderate Democratic senators facing re-election next year in Republican-leaning states to vote against the assault weapons measure, but then support the remaining overall package of gun curbs.

Gun control supporters consider a strong Senate vote important because the Republican-run House has shown little enthusiasm for most of Obama’s proposals.

Feinstein said Reid told her there will be two votes.

One would be on her assault weapons ban, which also includes a ban on ammunition magazines that carry more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The second would just be on prohibiting the high-capacity magazine clips.

Many Democrats think the ban on large-capacity magazines has a better chance of getting 60 votes than the assault weapons ban.

The Senate Judiciary Committee has approved four gun control measures this month, including Feinstein’s barring so-called assault weapons and high capacity magazines. The others would expand required federal background checks for firearms buyers, increase federal penalties for illegal gun trafficking and boost school safety money.

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (144)

FaithfulFriend
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:20pm
“Assault Weapons Ban Won’t Even Make It Into Final Gun Control Bill”

I guess gun control is what it isn’t?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- GuruMeditation
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:35pm
  It’s not about guns. It’s about CONTROL!
  
  Report this comment
- RetiredUSMC
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:43pm
  How the hell this old lame-brained bat made it this far in politics is baffling. She’s about as loony as they get.
  
  Report this comment
- WarMunger_Al
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:48pm
  no gun control bill should be past. Not one tiny piece. there are thousands of laws on the books, we don’t need new ones. In fact, we need to get rid of quite a few of them.
  
  Report this comment
- banjarmon
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:58pm
  NOW is NOT the time to give UP…Keep calling you senator and congressman and remind him/her often that they work for us in each state!! WE the PEOPLE will be watching what they do and WILL fire them if they don’t follow our wishes!
  
  Report this comment
- encinom
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 4:15pm
  The good thing is that where Reid is a coward, States like Colorado are pushing forward and doing the right thing.
  
  Report this comment
- JRook
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 4:38pm
  @WarMunger_Al You are correct we should get rid of all the BS laws that really do nothing to provide even reasonable control of guns. What we need is very simple. 100% background checks, 100% registration of guns and criminal and civil liability for owners of guns if their gun is involved in a criminal act, unless they report the gun stolen within 24 hours. For example, Ms. Lanza, if she had not died, should have been held both criminally and civilly liable for her sons use of her guns. As there is no way that 4 guns should be that accessible to anyone but the owner. When she was at work her guns should have been under lock and key.
  
  Report this comment
- ihasa
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 5:53pm
  JROOK – spot on!
  
  Report this comment
- Maji
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 6:07pm
  Call your senator tell him “to vote against” the UN resolution against the 2nd
  Amendment!
  Tell him/her that you expect them to introduce an “article of impeachment”
  if the president does!!
  HCON23 & SCON7
  
  Report this comment
- Rob in Katy
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 6:19pm
  Why do we need a new gun-control bill again?
  
  Report this comment
- Proverbs17-12NLT
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 6:43pm
  nice try you washed old democrat hag that hates America. Looks like the constitution won this one.
  
  Report this comment
- GunSlingerTexas
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 7:02pm
  Anyone who thinks this is a victory for the right to bear arms is a fools.These commies pushed this big agenda knowing they were not going to get all that they wanted, but they got what they expected, to walk away with another piece of the 2nd Amendment. They are working to disarm the American people the same way they have for the past 50 years, piece by piece. If they walk away with a national background check, registry or even a ban on magazine sizes it is their victory. And in just a matter of time the last bits of freedom will be under the thumb of these communist. And just remember, the communists are taking the 2nd Amend away state by state right now too. And just remember your NRA is helping these fools craft these laws by making agreements. There should be no agreements. The 2nd Amendment states SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, and that is the principal that we all should stand on. The US Supreme Court, The US Congress and the states and cities have NO AUTHORITY what so ever anywhere in the US Constitution to Amend the 2nd Amendment except as prescribed by the US Constitution. And to date, the 2nd Amendment has not been amended.
  
  Report this comment
- Secret Squirrel
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 7:06pm
  Don’t get too excited.
  Harry Reid is up for re-election in 2014.
  The Feinstein bill can be tacked on to another bill such as “children’s healthcare”,
  and then they’ll dare the republicans to vote against it.
  The anti’s are not going away. They know they have the republicans on the ropes
  and they’ll keep coming back.
  
  Report this comment
- MLeo
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 7:08pm
  “White House chief of staff on assault weapons ban: “We’re going to find the votes,”
  3/19/2013
  
  http://www.bluegrasspundit.com/2013/03/white-house-chief-of-staff-on-assault.html?utm_source=co2hog
  
  I take it old Diane Feinstein is going to take one for the team and accost senators in the shower room –full monte. Feinstein Emmanuel: not just for turning tricks anymore.
  
  Report this comment
- cosette
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 7:11pm
  @ Encinomoron…. Yeah… That’s rich. Disarming law abiding gun owners is, in your estimation, the “right thing”. My wish for you is this. One day you will be in harms way due to a criminal intent on committing a crime with a gun. You, like the panty waist you are, will be unarmed. There will be nobody nearby to assist. You will suffer the ramifications of your stupidity. Stupidity really should be painful.
  
  Report this comment
- cosette
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 7:21pm
  @ JROOK…The fact of the matter re: Ms Lanza, is there has been no determination made as to the manner in which her weapons were stored. You assume too much. Too bad she died. You would have her brought up on charges for having had the gall to exercise her constitutional rights. A constitutional right is just that. It is God given not ordained by the government.. One need not pass a test in order to exercise it. This is not Cuba or Venezuela, it’s America. ObaMao hasn’t totally destroyed it. Not yet.
  
  Report this comment
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 8:20pm
  Don’t get too excited about this. It is a tactic with a longer range plan. Reid is intelligent enough to realize how the Democrats had their ass handed to them in the ’94 election shortly after both Brady Bills went into effect. The results did not take out Clinton, but gave the Republicans both the House and Senate after more than forty years of Democrat domination. A possible plan is if this should pass under what they may make to appear reasonable the expected regaining of the House by the Dems will in their hopes lead to a the so called assault weapons to be added as an amendment. Its not a win for our side, but a tactic by their side.
  
  Report this comment
- CloudNine
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 10:56pm
  Amen…and oh, Encinom, please go home. You breathe and waste the very air that most logically thinking humans appreciate on a daily basis.
  
  Report this comment
- ICUHAJI2
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 11:09pm
  Slow down ya’ll; The big buck always comes out after the does and little bucks.. This is not what it appears to be… In watching the Democrates play chest for a few years now, it is high likely this is a pawn that was suppose to get your attention away from what is in the up-coming bill and has made its way without a fight. All the while they drew your attention to their bait.
  Remember, they baited Rush Limbaugh by Obama telling people they shouldn’t listen to him. Knowing full well, Rush would go on the offensive. Then they threw him the bait and hook, a Sandra Fluke.. 2nd term strategy, exercised 24 months in advance! Checkmate..
  SO, GET READY FOR THE “REAL DEAL”. Our 2nd Amendment fight has just begun…HillbillyProphet
  
  Report this comment
- dmerwin
  Posted on March 20, 2013 at 1:47am
  So that leaves what? Enhanced background checks? The Feds don’t prosecute illegal attempts to buy now. Nor do they rigorously prosecute felons in possession…. This really is about disarming law abiding citizens. Fast and Furious?…. Long forgotten and Holder gets a pass. Do you think the trial lawyers, the ACLU and the American Psychiatric Association will ever agree to include whack jobs in the data base?
  All BS
  
  Report this comment
- jettson
  Posted on March 20, 2013 at 11:35am
  Feinstein go to hell Your a jerk Harry shut you up HA HA
  
  Report this comment
- muffythetuffy
  Posted on March 20, 2013 at 10:59pm
  WHAT GOOD DOES DEFEATING GUN BAN ACCOMPLISH?
  
  Cheaper than Dirt, Cabela, and gun stores no longer sell semi-auto rifles. Cheaper than Dirt sold many different models but in October marked all of their inventory as OUT OF STOCK. Now with news the Gun Ban will be defeated, stores that claimed they were out of stock no longer list them. How can we have a 2nd Amendment if we cannot buy guns, buy ammo, buy powder, or even buy reloading tools. Somehow the Government was able to take guns off of the market. If the Government can do this to guns, it can do this to food, generators, cars, and anything.
  
  Report this comment
Mike76
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:19pm
To Feinstein: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

To the rest of you: That capacity ban IS going to pass – unless we put the fear of God into the rats in Congress. So far, they have not even begun to fear the People, and it is our fault.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- TEXASGRANNY73
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:38pm
  No, it isn’t. If he thought they could win, he would have called a vote. To Diane: na na na na na. Yes, Ted Cruz, way to go. We the people won one.
  
  Report this comment
- Proverbs17-12NLT
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 6:44pm
  Go douche diane you stink
  
  Report this comment
- TurboCat
  Posted on March 20, 2013 at 4:53am
  I’m happy about it but I’m too much of a realist to trust these lousy traitors. I say let’s organize a huge accusation straight from We the People. It should be as many of the people as possible and The Accusation should be, with all of our signs saying “Fast and Furious”. Imagine millions of those to scare the crap out of the administration.
  
  Report this comment
- dnewton
  Posted on March 20, 2013 at 6:36am
  I still say that poor woman suffers from PTSD as a result of the Moscone-Milk killings and should not be allowed to legislate or even discuss guns and especially gun banning until her mind heals. Her trauma makes her incapable of reasoned thought.
  
  Report this comment
- jettson
  Posted on March 20, 2013 at 11:48am
  This is the only law we will except
  A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED Feinstein go to hell They will not take our guns away
  
  Report this comment
- JacquesChirac
  Posted on March 20, 2013 at 5:13pm
  @Granny,
  
  I agree with you, and know that Harry didn’t even want this coming up for debate right now.
  
  However….
  
  What flabbergasts me the most is that the “democratic” process can be so controlled by one man, that debate can be so easily squelched…I know, I know, it’s been happening for centuries, but what a sad, sad state of affairs this country has fallen into when one person can determine what can/cannot be debated amongst duly (?) elected officials who supposedly represent us…
  
  Just like our FFs had in mind when they cooked up the whole thing, right?
  
  My father is a WWII vet who luckily missed the fighting in Okinawa, but still had mop up duties. He still has his faculties, and tells me almost every time we talk about what has happened to this country, “and I was ready to give my life so crumbums like the ones in the nation’s capital can do and say everything they do now?”
  
  He also says, “Well, at least I won’t have to be around much longer to watch it go even further down the tubes.”
  
  There are times I actually envy him for that…
  
  Oops! Now I’ve done it – here comes Cass Sunsteen….
  
  Report this comment
JerseyGuy
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:17pm
You’re right Ben. She’ll propose to take a “quick vote” on on a very broad ammendment just before end of session and hope to sneak it through (probably on a Friday) when all these folks are caring about is a “cold one”.
I think John McCain welcomed Woodrow Wilson into office (ha) right?. We can add Boehner, Shumer, Graham, Durbin, Reid — oh hell -all the moss covered politicians.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
PIGSWILLNEVERFLY
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:14pm
Her husband is a board member of Current TV.

All they really want is the data base. Register so they can locate and later take. They are sly. They always have more than one issue going so the right hand does not watch the left hand. They will link the data base and slowly take it all through regulations in 0bamacare, insurance and taxation. They will not stop. Their agenda is power and control…not just of guns but everything.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Obama Snake Oil Co
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:19pm
  As always, what guns? Oh, I gave those away right after I bought them. Naah, the guy moved away, not sure where he lives now…..The new necessary lie….
  
  Report this comment
Sargeking
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:11pm
This is only the beginning of beating back the Long March (Mao). One small battle won and an entire war yet to fight. We can win in the court of public opinion. We can win at the ballot box. We must take a long hard look at both sides of the aisle. We know full well the Dem enemy but the RINOS are just as bad. You know who they are in your state. Please 2014, get here soon!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:19pm
  Exactly. We keep the fire under their collective arses and let them know that we’re not backing down and that there will be NO magazine capacity limits. If they pass it, we let them know that we can easily make magazines in our basement at any capacity we wish. Keep up the pressure, let these fools come crashing into a burning heap onto the ground.
  
  It appears that the stealth registration aka “universal background check” went down in flames as well.
  
  Keep fighting y’all, and don’t let this pacify you. Until all of this is history and no more “votes” are taking place, we back off not one inch. Not one inch.
  
  Give’em hell!
  
  Report this comment
- WarMunger_Al
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:51pm
  wont win anything until these commie bass turds are pushing daisies. They will keep coming until they realize people will actually do something to stop their shenanigans.
  
  Report this comment
- shift
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 11:47pm
  Problem is there are more commie turds coming into the system all the time. With these marxist political science professors popping out a fresh batch of commie turds every year the fight will never go away. That is until repubs get smart and start making kids understand that the bullcrap pie the left is feeding them is nothing more than that. The leftist pinkos do a very good job of getting the attention of our kids. I remember when MTV was just that, now its a social engineering tool to rid all kids of any moral compass and teach them how to be good little peacenik tools. Then you have the massive influx of illegals that now have anchor babies who have grown up and are part of the pinko electorate. I suggest all freedom lovers and those that give a crap about what this country stands and stood for migrate to states that still understand what it is to be an American.
  
  Report this comment
Krav Maglock
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:10pm
Molon labe!!!!!!!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
momrules
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:06pm
This is theater folks. The real plans for gun control/confiscation are already decided. What they are and how they will implement them, when they will implement them is anyone’s guess but I think soon.

Right now they are entertaining the masses and giving them, us, something to focus on. They even give us a * win * to make us feel like things are shaping up our way. Don’t fall for it.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- searching for the Truth
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:11pm
  I agree. They are trying for much worst.
  
  Report this comment
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:22pm
  Agreed on keeping our focus. Force them to go the Executive Order route. If they do that, they’re over. But they may be damned arrogant enough to try it. Until then, we keep pressure on every damned lilly livered Congressman letting them know they better vote for the BOR, or they’re toast politically. Force the EO, or the surrender.
  
  Report this comment
- DeavonReye
  Posted on March 20, 2013 at 10:48am
  They may hope that people become less vocal with the AWB removed . . . and will slip it in with an ammending of the law. Definitely stay on top of them about this. The liberal elite want your firearms, . . . . not just “assault weapons” either. Just like Colorado, they will make every attempt to get people limited to a single shot firearm, if even that. It is much harder to control people, with impunity, when the people are armed.
  
  Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:06pm
Does this mean that when the next crazy person shoots someplace up we can blame Harry Reid?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- momrules
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:16pm
  Hello there The-Monk………..Blame Harry Reid? Why not? Yes, yes I think I will……….
  
  Report this comment
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 8:21pm
  Hi MONK, LOL, yes I blame Dingy Harry for a lot of things.
  
  Report this comment
Nabuquduriuzhur
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:05pm
“I very much regret it,” Feinstein, D-Calif., told reporters of Reid’s decision. “I tried my best.”

How does “tried my best” work with an act that is moral evil, that of creating more crime victims?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Nabuquduriuzhur
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:07pm
  The idea of trying to pass laws that make us unarmed and thus more likely to be victims is not exactly something to be proud of.
  
  I’ve lost not one, but two cousins to felons in two states. The only thing that might have saved them is if they’d been armed at the time.
  
  Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:04pm
Oh? Why not Harry? I would love to use the Dem votes to run them out of office on this issue. Too bad.. I guess their seats are more important than their principles, as always. Not that it would have survived in the house, but it would have let us know where you stand, fascist sycophants.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
beardedjesse
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:03pm
I really wish we could completely clean out the House & Senate right now. About 2% of those in either actually represent what the people really want…isn’t that what they were elected & swore an oath to do along with upholding the Constitution?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- turkey13
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:08pm
  What a politician will do to get on tv and go on & on about what they know will nevetr fly. But while there they get all that exposier. Feinstein forgot to look in the mirror befor getting before the cameras ! She looks like an 80 Year Old H_ooker.
  
  Report this comment
Sargeking
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:01pm
If the media and Dem polling was so very far off on the slam dunk of the “Assault Weapons Ban” then what about Gay Marriage and rest of the far Left agenda? Looks to me like the lamebrain, mainstream media was trying to play the American people and just got “hoist by their own petard”. For those of you living in Rio Lindo, you’ll need to look up the reference. Thanks.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
PA_Iraq_Vet
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:01pm
Hope she rots in he!!.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- BlackCrow
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:46pm
  And take Boxer and Peloci with her.
  
  Report this comment
booger71
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 2:59pm
Why exactly do we need to pass any kind of new gun legislation?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Cavallo
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:04pm
  To distract from the economy and massive unemployment.
  
  Report this comment
- dnewton
  Posted on March 20, 2013 at 6:43am
  It is what Democrats do. It is the natural and logical consequence of electing a Democrat.
  
  Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 2:57pm
Diane you progressive pustule don’t you see we don’t want you sticking your nose in our business,namely our right to own firearms,ANY firearms we want to purchase. I know you’ll continue your quest to eventually strip us of our right to bear arms but you can write all the unconstitutional ‘gun laws’ you want and it won’t matter we’ll still buy the firearms of our choice you vile idiot. People of Commiefornia fire that statist POS and put her out of our misery,while we’re at it fire McCain and Graham as well,two more prog pukes we can do without.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- DadRocked
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:09pm
  As they stated that ALL POLLS were in favor and they couldn’t even get it out of committee.
  Starting early covering their backsides for the 2014 elections?
  Hmmm…
  
  Report this comment
- progressiveslayer
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:20pm
  Yeah they’ll say or do anything to keep their jobs then change their tune after reelection.
  
  Report this comment
- DadRocked
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:57pm
  Slayer – Leaves Feinstein out to dry and weakened dems by keeping it on the front burner for so so long. If they have anything in the bill then it will be so watered down.
  
  Report this comment
crystalsky
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 2:57pm
If she was the woman or 1 of the white house family members were being attacked and some1 with consealed weapons protected there family member on the street at 2 am in the morning. And a man like Charles who stopped and helped the woman being beaten by some huge guy. I think they would think twice about wanting to ban any law abiding legal U.S. citizens from owning weapons.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Saving_the_Republic.com
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 2:56pm
Watch the other hand progressives do not give up without a fight.

Reid at the least is trying to prevent a vote on a bill that will not pass ONLY to protect those who will vote for it from the repercussions they will suffer in 2014 election. Its a game of chess right now.

Feinstein has been waiting for years to get this bill in she will not allow it to just die and mark my words there will be another mass killing (NOT SHOOTING, stop calling them shootings) to re-ignite things. One was just averted in FL, the loons feed legislators with all they need to push their agenda.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- mikem1969
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:07pm
  You are correct, have to watch the other hand. They will try a registry or a universal background check leading to a registry first, and then they will backdoor this in and come for the guns.
  
  Report this comment
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 4:02pm
  Keep in mind that we’ve just demonstrated that Save The Children is now powerless. That’s pretty significant if you think about it. With rows of dead beautiful children they were still unable to ghoul themselves out enough to convince people to give up their rights.
  
  Report this comment
wopalope
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 2:55pm
That woman is an A$$ of the first otder.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
gbfreak
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 2:55pm
now…KILLthe REST of the BILL!!!!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Sargeking
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 2:55pm
This is good news for American human rights but we must not give the Libs anything on chipping away our gun rights in the Bill of Rights. NOTHING! Looks like Reid wants to get re-elected. It will be interesting to see if the rest of the Dems get the message. Next month will cover a lot of ground, including the continued investigation into the cover-up at “Sandy Hook Line and Sinker”. The Libs are scared. They are very scared. That Sandy Hook coroner has a lot to answer for. Just like Benghazi, the debate is not over! Freedom rocks!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
stumpygrim
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 2:55pm
Well, lets see if odumbass comes up with an executive order, to ban ALL guns,otherwise he can unleaseh his little DHS army,without getting them slaughtered……

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:25pm
  If he tries either, then we win. We outnumber them 100:1. That’s the suicide route. Not that they’re smart enough to realize that of course.
  
  Report this comment
loveliberty83
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 2:54pm
we first have to get the guns from the bad guys that is the biggest joke ever–like they will register

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
tradexpertbuysell
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 2:54pm
Good! Up your nose with a rubber hose!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- SaturdaysWarrior76
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:32pm
  I haven’t heard that one in years.. thanks for the laugh! :)
  
  Report this comment
mikem1969
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 2:52pm
Watch out for the backdoor, they will be pushing harder for a universal gun registry and universal background checks as a compromise to not even voting on the ban. Keep your eyes open people.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Ben__Franklin
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 2:57pm
  Don’t buy it. Obamacare was not suppose to pass either. It will end up hidden on page 2315 for a bill not related to guns.
  
  Report this comment
- SaturdaysWarrior76
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:15pm
  @MIKEM and BEN: Or they’ll regulate the hell out of ammunition, making it nearly impossible to purchase. You’re both correct… watch the other hand. She’s giving up too “easily” here…
  
  Report this comment
- Ben__Franklin
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 4:03pm
  True, watch them tax bullets out of existence like the are trying with Cigarettes. Only the rich will be able to afford to protect themselves.
  
  Report this comment
Uechi
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 2:51pm
I don’t care what they do. I will not comply with violations of the 2nd Amendment.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Ben__Franklin
  Posted on March 19, 2013 at 3:03pm
  Watch the other hand. Progressive Progress Forwards 101 ~ write an extreme bill that includes what you really want, then cave to the demands of the extreme bill. Cut out everything except what you really wanted now – a foot into the door to build on. People will wipe there foreheads that the first version of the bill did not pass – then accept the revised bill because it now does not seem so bad.
  
  We need to fight any proposed bill over gun rights and the 2nd Amendment. Take names and help defeat these Elitists in Congress. Starting with John McCain. How many Popes have the world seen since McCain took his first term?
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.