Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested

Listen to the Buck Sexton Show Live on TheBlaze Radio

World

Israeli President Believes Obama Would Order Attack on Iran if Necessary

Mar. 21, 2013 2:05pm Tiffany Gabbay

Israeli President Shimon Peres Believes Obama Would Order Attack on Iran if Necessary

US President Barack Obama speaks during a press conference in the West Bank city of Ramallah, Thursday, March. 21, 2013. Credit: AP

While stressing that “shooting is the last option,” Israeli President Shimon Peres said Thursday that “America is not a chicken” and, as such, President Obama would be willing to launch a U.S. strike on Iran to thwart its nuclear weapons program.

Speaking to Fox News reporter Ed Henry, Peres said he believes that the White House is ready to take military action if necessary. The Israeli president said he is basing his assessment on private talks he had on Wednesday with Obama as well as public statements the American president made during his joint news conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“America is really looking for peace, but if somebody threatens peace, America is not a chicken,” Peres said before adding that in his experience, U.S. presidents carefully consider their words before making commitments like the one Obama made on Wednesday. Peres was referring to Obama’s vow on Wednesday to do “what is necessary” to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
The nearly 90-year-old Israeli statesman believes that Obama’s remarks had gravitas.

“From my experience, I know that an American president does not announce something by accident,” Peres told Fox.

“So I would say about all presidents: They are very careful with their words because they have to keep the American credibility.”

“Only if all of this (diplomacy) will not fly, then there must be another option,” he stressed. “If there won’t be another option, all the others don’t exist.”

When asked if he believes America is ready to “shoot if necessary,” Peres replied: “Yes.”

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (80)

hades3
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 6:17pm
I’m afraid Bibi is in for a huge surprise. I thought he was an intelligent man. However, trusting any thing Obama says , changes my opinion of him. Boehner is making the same mistake, when he says he trusts Obama.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Southernsoul
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 4:27pm
Of course Obama would attack Iran… if it was full of Jews, or Conservatives.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- KidCharlemagne
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 5:57pm
  Southernsoul
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 4:27pm
  Of course Obama would attack Iran… if it was full of Jews,
  ===========================
  
  Iran IS full of Jews though:
  
  “Today, Iran’s Jewish population is the second largest in the Middle East, after Israel.”
  Jewish Virtual Library: Jews Of Iran
  
  Report this comment
Sargeking
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 4:03pm
We need to look at the big picture beyond the cursory good tidings today between the two countries. For now everything is rosy between Israel and the U.S. The real deal is that Mr. Obama doesn’t support the best interests of Israel and they know it. Get ready for $40.00 a gallon for gasoline because Mr. Obama stopped the Keystone Pipeline, so that when Israel bombs Tehran, we won’t have the energy independence we needed. Thanks Libs and low information people, we owe it all to you!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- KidCharlemagne
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 5:55pm
  Sargeking
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 4:03pm
  so that when Israel bombs Tehran, we won’t have the energy independence we needed. Thanks Libs and low information people, we owe it all to you!
  ================================
  
  Speaking of “low information people”…….the U.S. is in possession of near-record high inventories of crude oil right now:
  
  —————————-
  “U.S. crude stockpiles at Cushing, Oklahoma, the delivery point for WTI and the country’s biggest oil-storage hub, rose 257,000 barrels to 50.8 million, the highest level in a month, data from the Energy Information Administration, the Energy Department’s statistical unit, showed yesterday. Supplies nationwide climbed to 381.4 million, the most since June.”
  http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-06/wti-oil-trades-near-two-day-low-as-u-s-crude-stockpiles-climb.html
  
  We’ve got so much oil right now that we are running out of places to store it.
  
  Report this comment
JoeSix-Pack
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:22pm
Where I believe the President of Israel misunderstands President Obama is that in order for him to order an attack upon Iran, it will have to be in his political interest. Benghazi should have demonstrated that as well as anything else.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:41pm
  Attacking Iran is not in America’s interest.
  
  Report this comment
- Ghandi was a Republican
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:57pm
  And allowing Iran to turn Israel into a parking lot is?
  
  Report this comment
- Ghandi was a Republican
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:58pm
  PS: How is beating the crap out of your aggressor an make YOU the attacker? Seriously.
  
  Report this comment
- Bronco II
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 5:49pm
  Agree.I think Israel knows who he really is but is being polite at least I think that’s what is going on.
  
  Report this comment
FISH_BONE
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:19pm
““From my experience, I know that an American president does not announce something by accident,” Peres told Fox.”

The problem is, the Kenyan maggot is NOT an American president. He is a fraud and a cancer inflicted on the American people. He is the absolute antithesis of American and everything America stands for. He is pure anti-American and anti-colonialist. Peres needs to open his eyes and see what there is to be seen.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- patriotpals
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 9:02pm
  I agree. President Peres is aged and obviously engaging in wishful thinking. I believe Bibi is less optimistic and is certainly more realistic, having been to the White House…and had to visit with the planters in the reception hall, instead of the perpetually-on-vacation Fraud in Chief. Mr. Soetoro aka Obama, is the classic consummate liar and nothing more. He will say whatever is expedient to his purposes, or whatever he is told to say, by his Puppet Masters, Soros and Kissinger.
  
  This morning, Glenn was mocking the video about that ridiculous ‘shape-shifter” nonsense, but in more seriousness, Barry was the real “shape shifter” in that video…vile creature that he is….
  
  Report this comment
michael48
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:12pm
he drinketh from the lemming-aid cupeth…happens here all the time…

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
AboveMyPayGrade
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:07pm
To read the comments that Shimon Peres has made, then either Peres is in an advanced stage of senility such that he has obviously been oblivious to what’s been going on the world since Obama became president – or else before leaving Israel, Obama and Peres had their own private “choom” session together and Peres is STILL heavily under the influence of the stuff.

Peres believes that Obama’s remarks have gravitas, huh? Well, then, he and John Boehner, of “I totally trust Obama” fame, make two in that club – but I don’t think they’d find any OTHER major world statesmen who will be joining them in that club.

And Peres believes that Obama cares about American credibility, huh? You mean, the way Obama has demonstrated that concern in the wake of Benghazi?

Words to Obama are like toilet paper, to be used for the moment and then discarded immediately afterward because they have served their purpose. And besides, Obama doesn’t even speak his OWN words ANYWAY in public: he just reads what someone ELSE has written FOR him off a teleprompter (he probably only sees those words for the very first time at that time). I’ll bet you that 5 minutes after Obama has finished a public address, he can’t even remember ANYTHING of what he just said. Why SHOULD he: when you’re reading just someone else’s words, why should those words mean anything to you?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
LeadNotFollow
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:53pm
In that photo above, looks like Obama is doing the Nazi salute.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:58pm
  The Nazi’s had more in common with Zionism.
  
  Report this comment
- 13th Imam
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:22pm
  Except for the point that Adolph played in the sandbox with the Mufti. Did some Jew park in your space , again?
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:36pm
  13th Imam, and Jewish Zionists played in the sandbox with Eichmann. And, no. My parking spot is open.
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:41pm
  @Jerk
  Eichmann, at best, pretended to play nice with the rich Jews so that he could acquire their wealth personally. He simply wanted to milk them for all they had.
  
  Report this comment
- Lothmar
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:43pm
  Who has a dedicated parking space and doesnt use it? Wasteful… *sarc*
  
  Report this comment
LeadNotFollow
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:50pm
Bibi’s being a bit naive, to believe that Barry will ever bomb his fellow Muslims.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:55pm
  We shouldn’t be bombing Muslims.
  
  Report this comment
- DORA_GASBAG
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:38pm
  I’m not a Muslim but I usually get bombed before I post any comments here. Can you tell?
  
  Report this comment
hauschild
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:50pm
“Necessary”

Hmmm…ponder and then think outside the box to define what “necessary” means to the Marxist and that would be whether it suits his political agenda. Then you have to remain outside the box and analyze the Marxist’s “agenda”, which certainly would not include the protection of Israel.

So, what you end up with is a potential indirect protection of Israel IF it would be politically advantageous for the Marxist to do so; which at the present time and taking his statements into account, it is not. Israel is once again, on its own. I hope they truly understand this.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:57pm
  Israel should have been on its own from the beginning. We would be a wealthier and more respected nation had we not stuck our noses into other people’s business. Israel is a problem. Israel is, by definition, a belligerent.
  
  Report this comment
- upeopleneedtogetalife
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:02pm
  Necessary means what ever the Jewish Apartheid reinging in America says and when.
  
  Not very difficult to see who is calling the shots.
  
  Sure is hell is not the US President but that’s been obvious for a long time.
  
  Report this comment
- 13th Imam
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:05pm
  THE JEWS took some jerks parking space again.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:10pm
  13th Imam, no. They’re taking my country. And, I’m mad as hell.
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:10pm
  Israel is, by definition, a belligerent? Didn’t know Israel was in the dictionary Jerk.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:20pm
  Tzion, that’s why I’m here. To teach you. Israel can be found under “belligerent,” ’cause it is. It can also be found under, “Greatest threat to world peace.”
  
  Here, let these guys help you out in your quest to find the truth. They’re a bunch of good people who care less about our secular world, but they do have an opinion, nonetheless.
  
  http://jewsagainstzionism.com/about/index.cfm
  http://jewsagainstzionism.com/about/index.cfm
  
  Report this comment
- 13th Imam
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:23pm
  Mad or insane? Same diff
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:39pm
  @Jerk
  Why not just link to Hamas’ website, or PFLP, or Islamic Jihad, or how about the Aryan Nation? Seriously Jerk that’s essentially what you did. You linked to the website of the most radical, bigoted Jewish group you could find that just happened to be religious. Allow me to define those who you cited: they have a specific interpretation of the Talmud that tells them Zionism is evil when equally learned men have dismissed their interpretation. Despite this these people argue that their view is the only right one and any Jew who opposes them is pure evil and sinful. Sounds like you found some fellow bigots to hang out with.
  
  The simple truth is Jerk, there are far more Israel supporters among the religious Jewish communities then there are those who oppose Israel. By the same token, religious Jews are generally more supportive than secular Jews. This fact is plain as day for anyone willing to see it.
  
  Report this comment
POET
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:47pm
And what els would thay say ” Oy! were on our own “?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:47pm
If you read between the line, Bebe made it clear that Israel will do what is necessary and actually said that obama has nothing to say about it. We all know that obama told Bebe that he was on his own. Bebe said “heard you loud and clear”. Watch obama’s face as Bebe was saying this. Checkmate.
Obama looks bad to his mulim brotherhood buddies AND obama has been forced into taking a position he otherwise will have to deny IN PUBLIC. That’s how you deal with an alinsky radical. Now what obama? No more games. No more word play.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
The-Monk
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:43pm
Another reason Monks do not believe in belief….

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
johnpaulkuchtajr
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:40pm
Sorry, BiBi knows in his heart that the Ayatollah Obama would more likely order an attack on Israel than Iran.

And, to tell you the truth, given the complicity of our military in the treason at Benghazi the night of 9/11/12, those orders MAY just be followed. There are no more General Hams out there.

Sorry, but I trust no one getting a “gubbamint” check. I’ll rely on my buddies Messrs. Smith, Wesson, Colt and Herr Ruger!

“Remember Benghazi and ALL the Traitors!”

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
AUsername
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:31pm
Iraq was bad enough and almost impossible to forgive but if they get us in Iran, we better boycott and support any effort legally to get rid of them. I hope the president doesn’t attack Iran and acknowledges their right to defend themselves to.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- KidCharlemagne
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:48pm
  Bilderberg seems anxious to get the ball rolling though:
  
  ————————
  “During a March 4 reception in Washington, D.C., Bilderberg attendee Richard Perle was overheard by an AMERICAN FREE PRESS source pressing for war with the Persian country. Perle callously claimed that a war with Iran would only take “two or three days” and the U.S. military “would have low casualties.”
  
  Perle is best known as one of the leading architects behind President George W. Bush’s war on Iraq, arguing that the U.S. military needed only 40K soldiers to take over the country. Ten years later, Perle has been proven wrong on Iraq. He is also wrong on Iran. A war against the Iranian people would be a disaster for America.”
  http://americanfreepress.net/?p=9239
  
  Report this comment
- Ghandi was a Republican
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:49pm
  ??? Iran has no right to defend themselves. Iran is a rogue regime. Since when do you tolerate your enemy vowing to destroy you? Attempting to kill your women and children? What Planet are you from?
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:01pm
  Here’s the Perle plan, and we’ve been following it ever since 1996:
  
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clean_Break:_A_New_Strategy_for_Securing_the_Realm
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:04pm
  Ghandi, when was the last time Iran attacked its neighbors? Never in your lifetime is the answer. Propaganda makes the non-belligerent look like the belligerent. But, facts tell a different story.
  
  And, Israel has attacked all of its neighbors, and some more than once, in your lifetime.
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:13pm
  @Jerk
  From your source:
  “Israel can make a clean break from the past and establish a new vision for the U.S.-Israeli partnership based on self-reliance, maturity and mutuality — not one focused narrowly on territorial disputes. Israel’s new strategy — based on a shared philosophy of peace through strength — reflects continuity with Western values by stressing that Israel is self-reliant, does not need U.S. troops in any capacity to defend it, including on the Golan Heights, and can manage its own affairs.
  
  To reinforce this point, the Prime Minister can use his forthcoming visit to announce that Israel is now mature enough to cut itself free immediately from at least U.S. economic aid and loan guarantees at least, which prevent economic reform.”
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:22pm
  @Jerk
  “Ghandi, when was the last time Iran attacked its neighbors? Never in your lifetime is the answer.”
  
  LIAR. Iran has attacked Jews and Israelis by way of terrorism on several occasions. Where do you think Hamas got Iranian rockets from? Rhode Island? Mars? Where did Hezbollah get it’s hands on Iranian built drones? Atlantis? Iran has made it it’s mission to see Israel destroyed and have taken active steps to achieve that goal, even if it means launching attacks in Bulgaria against Israeli tourists. Iran=Hezbollah=Hamas.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:35pm
  Tzion, glad you pointed that out. That text has been edited to a more favorable presentation for Israel. Not an uncommon finding. It doesn’t even mention Israel’s desire to influence American policy, as the complete study does. Here’s a better version. I have an old hard copy, and will check it later.
  
  http://classes7.com/A-Clean-Break-A-New-Strategy-for-Securing-the-Realm-download-w28899.pdf
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:40pm
  Tzion, my brother knows your uncle so your uncle must be my brother who knows me… . How convoluted do you want to get. Fact, Iran has not attacked its neighbors. You can play your obfuscation game as a home game, not an away game.
  
  Report this comment
oxycontinxx
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:22pm
“While stressing that “shooting is the last option,” Israeli President Shimon Peres said Thursday that “America is not a chicken”

sir………..you are right………..america is not chicken. but burrak obammy is a yellow bellied, dithering, cant-make-a-decision, sorrry MF president………..he ll let israel burn in hell before he would unleash our military on iran or any other invading force.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:35pm
  There is no reason that our American military should be launched to do anything for Israel. We’ve spent enough American lives and enough American wealth on that belligerent little nothing nation. Israel is the problem.
  
  Report this comment
- Ghandi was a Republican
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:56pm
  Hey Jerk! True or false: Iran is a threat to World peace and has vowed Nuclear war?
  It would be best to Nuke Iran first. Only a liberal would think that evil is good and has rights. Obama is complicit. Obama threw an internal resistance in Iran under the bus, favoring evil. Why did he support the Muslim Brotherhood elsewhere? Obama INSTALLED hateful regimes that mirror Iran’s. Why?
  He supported Iran’s hateful regime when it was threatened: WHY?
  That is something only a hateful person would do. What is obama really? Obama is a narcissistic despot in his own right. He NEVER, EVER told the American people he was supporting all this evil. He denied it. Yet he does it under false pretense, lying about it all the way, as in benghazi. Obama is the greatest threat to World peace since Hitler. WHY does he do this? Because obama oozes evil from his every pore. He stinks of progressivism and alinsky radicalism. EVIL!
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:08pm
  Ghandi, provably false. Iran hasn’t attacked another nation in over 100 years. Israel is the greatest threat to world peace, and the rest of the world knows it. America’s been kept in the dark. Here’s my proof. Give me yours, and when you can’t, it will speak volumes.
  
  http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/nov/02/israel.eu
  
  Report this comment
- KidCharlemagne
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:16pm
  Ghandi was a Republican
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:56pm
  It would be best to Nuke Iran first.
  ============================
  
  Wouldn’t you be killing a lot of Jews though if you did that?:
  
  Jewish Virtual Library: Jews Of Iran
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:25pm
  @Jerk
  I can prove you wrong with one word: Fajr. It’s the name of an Iranian rocket that was used against Israel last year by terrorists after being provided to them by Iran.
  
  Report this comment
Caballosinnombre
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:22pm
I’m not sure why he went over there in the first place, unless he wants a legacy like Carter’s.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- subic
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:53pm
  Barry is there to stir up trouble just like he did when he went to Egypt.
  
  Report this comment
Sargeking
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:18pm
Israel is certainly hoping that America would launch a preemptive nuclear strike on Iran before they send the “Big One” over to Tel Aviv but they are sure to do it first and sooner than you might think.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:25pm
  There’s no other nation in the Middle East that Israel hasn’t attacked. It needs to attack Iran in order to complete its belligerency course.
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:36pm
  @Jerk
  An easily proven lie. After all, when did Israel attack Yemen, Kuwait, or Qatar? Those are all Middle Eastern. How about the big one, Saudi Arabia? Israel practically borders them. Besides Iran struck first, as did every other country Israel ever attacked.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:15pm
  Tzion, you are correct. I should have said its neighbors, and I should have added its attack on the U.S.. Here, someone else has thought about this question, and sourced it out.
  
  http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070429203017AAc2yr9
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 4:13pm
  @Jerk
  Here’s what your source said:”IF you don’t think the media is controlled then ask yourself why the American public was never told about
  ISRAEL’S ATTACK on the USS LIBERTY as they attempted to make it look like Egypt was the attacker, hoping that the U.S. would roll in big on Egypt. Many americans lives were lost but they kept the story low key.”
  
  Now for facts. At the time the Liberty was attacked, the situation on the ground was as follows:
  1. Israel controlled all of Gaza, Sinai, and the entire Judea-Samaria region including east Jerusalem.
  2. Egypt had lost its entire air force and was calling for a ceasefire on the precondition Israel withdraw from the Sinai, which Israel refused to do.
  3. Israel began withdrawing ground forces from Sinai for an invasion of the Golan.
  
  So answer me these few simple questions:
  1. Why would Israel attack the Liberty?
  2. Why would Israel claim responsibility for the attack if their intention was to blame Egypt?
  3. Who would be stupid enough to think they could pass off a French-built Mirage-III for a Soviet Built Mig?
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 4:42pm
  @Jerk
  “The alleged “hospitality and friendliness” of its people can be very well represented by the fact that israel is the only nation to participate (mainly provoking side) in 5 wars (that’s only what i can count and these were in 1948, 1956, 1967, 1973, 2006) in 5 decades that’s a new war every 10 years.” -your source.
  
  1948-Israel attacked by 5 armies, including the Iraqi army. Israel itself barely had an army.
  1956-If anyone was behind this war, it was Britain and France, who pressured Israel into helping the reclaim the Suez Canal
  1967-This war began with a blockade of an Israeli port by Egypt, an act of war. Israel did attack first but this was justifiable.
  1973-Arabs launch a surprise attack on Yom Kippur.
  2006-Hezbollah launches rockets into Israel, prompting an invasion of Lebanon.
  
  You said this source is reliable because………..HE LIES ABOUT EVERYTHING.
  
  Report this comment
media-bias-steals-elections
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:17pm
When are you going to close the embassies in the Middle East, that support the religion of Islam, with public tax dollars? Does that “chop and screw’ the meaning of the US Constitution? Put that in your pot pipes and smoke it?

Or is that a musical experience where you chop and up and screw your liver, never to wake up again? Bown down to that Bxxx? Let’s give a shout out to Whitney Houston? Oh, our bad, never mind, she’s dead, Bxxx?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Shasta.Red.Banks
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:14pm
Only after Iran attacked Israel with nuclear weapons.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The_Jerk
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:17pm
  Israel is not our problem. Israel does not deserve our wealth or lives. It is the most belligerent nation in the Middle East, by far. No one gets along with that two-bit place.
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:38pm
  Jerk
  Under Saddam Hussein, Iraq launched unprovoked attacks against Iran, Kuwait, Israel, and even its own people. How is Israel belligerent compared to that?
  
  Report this comment
- KidCharlemagne
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 3:11pm
  tzion
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:38pm
  Under Saddam Hussein, Iraq launched unprovoked attacks against Iran, Kuwait, Israel,
  ==========================
  
  Of course, at the time though Israel was helping the Ayatollah Khomeini fight Saddam Hussein:
  
  Israeli support for Iran during the Iran–Iraq war
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 4:46pm
  @Kid
  True, but they only accepted it out of need. Your own source says that Khomeini emphatically denied receiving any aid from Israel and even went as far as to accuse Saddam of working with Israel and forcing Israel to bomb his own nuclear facility.
  
  Report this comment
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:13pm
Remember Benghazi you fool. He lies all the time.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- CatB
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:23pm
  See below .. I believe Obama is being played .. all the glowing praise of Obama .. is putting him in a position where he must defend Israel .. or look bad to the entire world.
  
  Never forget Benghazi and keep demanding the TRUTH.
  
  Report this comment
jakartaman
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:13pm
Bibi,
I thought you were a smart realist.
Obama cannot be trusted – what is he waiting for – does he or for that matter anyone really believe these kooky zealots will stop their goal of nuclear weapons. Obama is playing for time to let Iran HAVE nukes and Israel cannot get to them.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
CatB
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:13pm
I believe that Israel is putting Obama in a place where he MUST defend Israel … or else look like the loser he is. I believe they are playing Obama and I like it. About time someone made Obama do what is right .. not nothing or bad decisions.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
The_Jerk
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:12pm
Sure, America is a puppet to the Jewish state. Shows how they can bring down this country.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- pragmaticpatriot
  Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:22pm
  I disagree, we are The 1WOs’ puppet allied with The Muslim Brotherhood via Valarie Jarrett
  
  Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on March 21, 2013 at 2:11pm
Yeah, well, President Peres, I strongly suggest you trust BUT verify.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.