FCC Approves Net Neutrality in Straight Party-Line Vote

In what one Republican called a “monumental shift toward government control of the Internet,” the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday approved a proposal granting the federal government the authority to regulate Internet broadband providers under the same law as public utilities.

The five commissioners voted 3-2 along party lines in favor of the proposal known as net neutrality. The 317-page plan, which has not yet been publicly released, bans broadband providers from blocking, throttling or prioritizing certain Internet pages over others. The FCC has said the proposal will not seek to impose any new taxes or fees.

Federal Communication Commission (FCC) ChairmanTom Wheeler, center, joins hands with FCC Commissioners Mignon Clyburn, left, and Jessica Rosenworcel, before the start of their open hearing in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 26, 2015. Internet service providers like Comcast, Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile would have to act in the "public interest" when providing a mobile connection to your home or phone, under new rules being considered by the Federal Communications Commission. The rules would put the Internet in the same regulatory camp as the telephone, banning providers from "unjust or unreasonable" business practices. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
Federal Communication Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler joins hands with FCC Commissioners Mignon Clyburn, left, and Jessica Rosenworcel, before the start of their open hearing in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 26, 2015. Internet service providers like Comcast, Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile will have to act in the “public interest” when providing a mobile connection to your home or phone, under new rules approved by the FCC. The rules put the Internet in the same regulatory camp now as the telephone, banning providers from “unjust or unreasonable” business practices. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

The three Democrats voiced their support of the measure while the two Republicans dissented. Democrats say they have the authority to impose the new regulations under under Title II of the Federal Communications Act of 1934.

In his remarks, Republican Commissioner Ajit Pai called the plan a “monumental shift toward government control of the Internet” and a “rapid departure” from market-oriented approaches.

Wheeler said the new regulations will make America “more competitive,” not hinder its ability to compete when asked by a reporter after the meeting to respond to such claims.

Pai further critiqued, saying “it is sad to to witness the FCC’s unprecedented attempt to replace that freedom with government control.” Wheeler, however, championed the transparency of the process after the vote on Thursday, calling it “the most open proceeding in FCC history.”

Wheeler announced the plan in a Feb. 4 op-ed, in which he called it the “strongest open Internet protections ever proposed, saying it “assures the rights of Internet users to go where they want, when they want, and the rights of innovators to introduce new products without asking anyone’s permission.”

Republicans made numerous efforts to stop the issue from coming to this. They have argued – and are still arguing – that the FCC shouldn’t get to decide how to regulate the Internet. That power, they say, is one that should be granted by Congress.

In fact, Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) drafted legislation that would address many of the same issues as the ones the new FCC rules address. Reps. Greg Walden (R-Ore.) and Fred Upton (R-MI) joined with Thune in the House in trying to find a legislative solution ahead of the meeting, but were unable to push through a bill in time.

With Thursday’s vote now on the books, the issue might still be far from over. Some have said the fate of these new rules is destined for the Supreme Court.

Republican Commissioner Mike O’Rielly hinted at future challenges Thursday, saying the plan is “not likely to survive judicial scrutiny.”

This post has been updated to reflect the plan approved by the FCC Thursday is 317 pages, not 332 pages. Last minute revisions were made at the request of some companies, including Google, affecting its length, Politico reported.

Follow Jon Street (@JonStreet) on Twitter

702 Comments