3 Minutes of Hardcore Gay Porn Interrupt Canadian Newscast
- Posted on April 21, 2012 at 9:49am by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »
An Ontario TV station apologized to viewers Friday after they were treated to an eye-opening three minutes of hardcore gay pornography during a newscast.
“At about 9:30 our broadcast signal was overrun briefly by inappropriate video – pornography to be specific,” a message posted on CHCH Television’s website said.
“[W]e would like to apologize to our viewers. This was a problem that originated, not at CHCH, but at a cable company. Apparently some cable lines had been cut, and in the splicing back together some inappropriate content went to air,” the message said.
The master control desk was forced to make “frantic efforts” to pull the explicit content off, according to the Hollywood Reporter.
News director Mike Katrycz said they’re still waiting for a formal answer from the cable company about how the mistake happened.
KRDO-TV in Colorado had a similar situation last week when hardcore pornography aired during “Good Morning America.”
Watch the station’s apology below:




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (101)
The Goo
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 1:23pmComcast did this in Colorado Springs, Colorado during Good Morning America… It can’t be a coincidence.
Report Post »Leopold
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 2:07pmWhat I find hard to blieve that it took 3 1/2 minutes to do something about it.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 2:23pmMaybe someone found Obama’s college records
Report Post »yougottabekidding
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 4:06pmThey finally got to play MSNBC is Canada
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 4:10pmUh-oh, gerbil talk on TV?!
Report Post »moreoilplease
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 5:01pmIf some cable line got cut and spliced back together what are the odds that gay porn would somehow get on air? And similar situation in the US with porn somehow accidentally patched through? Sure, it was just an accident. Horse hockey!
Report Post »GBTVFan_Non_American_Overseas
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:16pmPushing the envelope again and again….conducting social experiments to check viewer’s reactions to their perversions….
Report Post »miketype1each
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:14pmHasn’t happened where I live, but have all confidence that it will. Soon enough, refusals by straights of the sexual advances of gays will be viewed as RACIST, and eventually become HATE CRIMES.
Report Post »grannyrecipe
Posted on April 22, 2012 at 7:16amOne minute and I’m watching CNN and the next, I’m watching CNN 2? I guess…same thing, I suppose.
Report Post »sillyfreshness
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 1:10pmI notice this crap of playing gay porn on public airwaves is becoming more and more “normal”. Soon, if you are offended by your local station playing hardcore gay porn, then you will be declared a “homophobe” and sent off to the local gulag for reeducation. I find it hard to believe that some cable line is streaming gay porn 24/7 and it got spliced into a children’s cartoon cable line. Yeah right.
Report Post »justinj5869
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 1:52pmAbsolutely agree.. God forbid you disagree with their sexual preferences.. Then its YOU that are the sick one.. Our society has become so corrupt and shameless.
Report Post »WeekendAtBernankes
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 1:53pmlol yep that’s the big government conspiracy: play gay porn on local news channels and then arrest you for being offended.
omg step away from the computer, take a walk around the neighborhood, you’re cheese is sliding off your *******.
Report Post »Cosmos102
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:40pmHow many still think Gay sex is morally acceptable? After witnessing the anal stretch marks, many people may decide otherwise. That ain’t no colonoscopy.
Report Post »reportanddeport
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:56pmIt’s homosexual activism, trying to shove their sick garbage down people’s throats. And they won’t be prosecuted for it, because that would be “homophobic”.
Report Post »PIL
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:46pmNo it’s not, it’s was a technological glitch. Besides, there’s plenty of Christian Activism on TBN, EWTN, and other Christian networks. Oh, and there’s also the Playboy Channel which shows the most graphic sex on Friday and Saturday night.
Report Post »symphonic
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:36pmWhat a LIE. If the cable was cut and needed to be spliced, then the original programming would have been cut too. When a cable gets cut (think tractor digging one up), the cables in the cable all go down. I can accept it if the original programming went down, but it has to be explained how the original programming stays on and yet instantaneously switches to porn. No, that’s a switch that took place. Makes no sense at all.
Report Post »woebegone
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 1:25pmHave to agree, this story doesn’t make sense to me either. How do you have the appropriate feed coming through apparently without problem then suddenly to gay porn then 3 minutes later the appropriate feed again? It is just really hard for me to believe this was a “wire splicing” problem, in fact impossible to believe. They had to track down the gay porn feed to shut it down? then suddenly the news again?, without loss of signal? Either the story is incomplete or an outright lie. I am so tired of this sort of stuff. Did some miscreant experiment with their ability to play with the airwaves and succeed? This seems so much more likely than a splicing problem perpetrated by some hapless lineman somewhere. This is the sort of stupidity that just wears you down.
Report Post »The Gooch
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:24pmIt’s all good. In today’s politically correct environment, that should just be considered mandatory educational material. Enjoy your edification, hosers.
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:51pmHa. Funny. Hosers! I get it! Like Bob and Doug McKenzie, take off, eh!
Report Post »LeadNotFollow
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:12pm…
Report Post »This happens way too often. Has to be on purpose.
symphonic
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:34pmIt IS on purpose. Gays are trying to corrupt minds, same way pornographers do. They hope to spark the weakness in people, increase their numbers, try and become legitimate.
Report Post »burnteye86
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:37pmI agree on that
Report Post »Skeebee
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 2:34pm@Symphonic
Report Post »You’re an idiot.
hatchetjob
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 5:48pmSYMPHONIC is right, satan is trying to take as many souls with him to hell as he can. It’s the end times.
Report Post »KrebsCyclist
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:01pmBlaze, your front-page headline is unfortunate:
[WATCH] 3 Minutes of Hardcore Gay Porn…
Thanks but, uh, no.
Report Post »db321
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:10pmBarney Frank will investigate, but first he must watch the whole video!
Report Post »floridacockleburr
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:35amHere’s the message you should get from this story. If you like gay porn and socialized medicine, MOVE TO CANADA.
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:31amAll the hetero libs who love homosexuals probably never think about how disgusting their sexual habits are. Well, now they know! Do what you want in private, who cares? But the exposure to sunlight of the obscenity known as gay sex ought to turn some heads I’d think.
Report Post »symphonic
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:40pmGays did this to YOUTUBE several years back, uploading their porn like rabid animals trying to breed new customers (namely, kids). Viewers could not report it fast enough, it was going up every few seconds, its like there was some PLAN to do this. Video recognition technology now allows Youtubes computers to recognize and delete it before anyone ever has to have the unfortunate and DISTURBING experience of watching these very sick people.
Report Post »PoliticallyRightUs.Com
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 2:05pmYou are not making any sense…
Report Post »Well figures, you must be a liberal as you made a screen name looks just like mine. No surprise here!
robert
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 2:06pmsymphonic
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:40pm
“Gays did this to YOUTUBE several years back, uploading their porn like rabid animals trying to breed new customers (namely, kids).”
You’ve got that exactly right.
There’s also a hardcore group of activist homosexuals inundating the web forums who think their injection of comments will influence conservative sites toward a more homosexual friendly attitude by most. They labor under the delusion that prolonged subjection of gay images will inure the mainstream into regarding homosexuality as just another lifestyle.
What homosexuals don’t understand is that normal revulsion to their mental disorder is perfectly natural for all people, and it is nature’s way of assuring the perpetuation of the species by instiling in the human psyche a revulsion and disgust of same sex mental disorders.
On this site here, JZS….Votebush2012….Jaycen…..publiuspencilman…encicom…and others all are part of that activist cabal. They want a leftist utopian society, not because they are for love and tolerance, but because they perceive such a society will include homosexuality as just another lifestyle.
If you have ever wondered why they come across as such left wing crazies, that’s the reason. They call it “fighting the good fight.”
Report Post »chazmo
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 3:52pm@Robert. I agree those folks come here and pop off with nonsense hater speech. If they were really trying to change hearts and minds they would have, well thought out, intelligent rebuttals to the conservative way of thinking. I smell either a paid commenter hired by Media Matters or TheBlaze staff are doing this to drive comments and traffic. When I post on a Lib site I never use flaming to get my point across. That just alienates the lefties and doesn’t serve to change minds. Your only hope when rebutting an argument is to use rational facts without the name calling. When that doesn’t work I will go away. I will not subject my time to trolling Leftist sites. Why would these guys. I mean the argument is “we want to know what the other team is doing”. Well that’s fine but, to spend hours commenting with jibberish hater speech isn‘t going to change anyone’s mind here. I just don’t understand why a person would spend so much time on a Blog they hate. Makes no sense.
Report Post »robert
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 6:42pmCHAZMO
” Well that’s fine but, to spend hours commenting with jibberish hater speech isn‘t going to change anyone’s mind here. I just don’t understand why a person would spend so much time on a Blog they hate. Makes no sense.”
What you say is pefectly logical, but these people aren’t logical types, plus they’re arrogant to boot. I think it is that arrogance that blinds them to their own shortcomings, in addition to the fact that, being homosexuals, they’re laboring under a mental disorder as well.
They are channeled into liberal thought and dogma and have been all their adult lives. They have unproven beliefs and entertain certain ideas that have no basis in fact in the real world, but are accepted tenets which they discuss freely in their own small circle of strange people.
They can refer to something as being “disproven” like Murray and Hernsteinn’s Bell Curve. But the only thing “disproven” about it is that they and their circle of strange people didn’t like what the study reveals so they set about deconstructing various items and holding them among themselves as absolute truths, when they are no more than lame attempts to discredit, but they believe the distortions whole heartedly and think people are foolish who do not share their nonsensical conclusions.
I understand your reluctance to believe their clumsiness does anything but sway people to their point of view, but give what I wrote further consideration and note their arrogance.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:23amThe branches of Joseph go over many walls, and down into many wells. Those who are in Joseph can fall into as many gutters as they dig, and they will still be in God. The gutters they dig for those in the lord, are irrelevant.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:24amBut it’s entertaining watching the labor of the wicked.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:33amIt’s because Jesus had long before crucified the dust of the soul, and had no reason to crucify the flesh.
Report Post »Captain Crunch
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:46amWhat are you reading or listening to? Or maybe a more appropriate question would be, who is making your meth?
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:46amWhen Jesus returns, he will be traveling in an intergalactic space-ship.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:50amAnd I say that because the Garden of Eden is inside each and every individual person, and it comes to four heads to feed it: the sun, the earth, the moon, and that other head that goes east of Assyria, a planet that has been getting created since the beginning of the world.
Report Post »Captain Crunch
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:50amYep…definitely meth.
Report Post »abbygirl1994
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:22amAndthey really expect us to believe that someone spliced the wrong wires?? Satan is working overtime people! 3 full minutes of filth seen by innocent eyes will be forever branded in their minds.. and this is what evil people want! God help us and our children!
Report Post »right-wing-waco
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:36amAbby,
Report Post »I agree, 3 minutes is plenty of time to change which feed to display. I’m beginning to wonder if Obama or OWS had anything to do with these “mistakes”.
symphonic
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:43pmIf a wire needs to be spliced, because it was cut, there would have been NO signal of the original programming. It would have just been down for a few hours while the “cable” company fixed it. Ever had internet service go down? Its down for an hour or more.
The mixed signal crossed wires story is just nonsense. The reporters don’t even look like they believe it. They look embarrassed.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:20amHa. What, do they think they can pollute those who are in God? Won’t happen no matter how hard they try. In fact I could fall into all the gutters they dig, and it won’t matter.
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:50am@ITSJUSTTIM: You’re sounding a little weird buddy!
Report Post »PoliticallyRightUs.Com
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 2:07pmDon’t Confuse me with this person who has stolen my ID
Report Post »mrsmileyface
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:15amWhat!!! Canadians dont like to watch greased up guys wrestling? What if it was on ice?
Report Post »Legal Immigrant
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:00amSensational free advertising blitz…
Report Post »Speak without Fear
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:51amThere has been a lot of “ACCIDENTAL” porn coming across the television networks lately!!!!!
Report Post »James12703
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:40amWTF is wrong with these cable companies. At least show Sasha Grey according to several people who interviewed her she’s the dirtiest person alive.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:38amAnd for 2 minutes Libertarians cheered… then got quiet for 1 minute… then “shots” heard ’round the world followed for 3 seconds… followed by a cigarette.
Report Post »Kerstile
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:55amIt’s all about you, bud. Love your OCD. Hahahaha! Thanks for the entertainment.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:06amYou’re lucky KERS. If the topic was about crap… I could tie Ron Paul or “Libertarians” like you into it one way or another. I DO try to hold back though. Ha! Smoke a dube and relax lib.. you’re getting tense.
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:33amLeave “Time_” alone. He is a very lonely troll who seeks negative attention because he is incapable of receiving postitive attention because of his pathetic and reprehensible demeanor. He should be pitied; not mocked.
Report Post »Grow up, kid.
Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:48amAs a libertarian and Paul supporter, I can say you don’t understand the concept.
And I speak for myself here but I’m sure most libertarians agree. I believe it is fine if people want to have a gay porn station, even though i think it is vile and disgusting. I would never tune into it, and i would most likely not hang around people like that did.
This incident however seems to be more likely sabotage by activists, which I totally disagree with. Freedom, and liberty applies to all, not just those I agree with. In this act, the freedom and liberty of the news cast was infringed upon, making it wrong.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:51amDISS. Just for you….. “LOL.” Ron Paul, Libertarians (Murray Rothbard worshippers), and Ron Paul worshippers are on the same level as Obama and his worshippers IMO. My YOB (yes, a lonely YOB at that)… is to remind anyone who cares to read of just that fact.
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:57amYob?
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:13pmBALLOT. I understand the concept just fine, ty.
Libertarians and Ron Paul supporters (especially on The Blaze) think that porn, drugs, prositution or whatever you want to do to yourself or for yourself, or with yourself is just fine. But of course 99.9% of those same posters here may think it’s vile, disgusting or whatever …and would never, ever do it themselves. It’s all about freedom right? Sooo, if most Libertarians/Ron Paul supporters are not doing any of that… you must be pushing for all those “other” liberals to screw themselves up and possibility innocent bystanders “Conservatives” along the way right?
Well, I believe as a Conservative it is also our right to protect ourselves from the vile and disgusting useless behavior of the vile, disgusting and useless among us
Talking about activists… you do know the Ron Paul crowd were the first “Guy Fawkes” mask wearers before the OWS nimrods right? Just want to remind people of who all the “activists” are.
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:31pm@Time
Report Post »Cirgarettes are bad for your health and bad for the health of those around someone who smokes. We should ban cigarettes, right? The same can be said for alcohol. Lets ban beer, right?
Also, dogs have sharp teeth that can harm or even kill someone. Lets ban all dogs, right?
The same can be said about guns. In the wrong hands, a gun can injure or even kill. Let’s ban guns, right?
If we ban everything we will be safe, right?
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 12:57pmDISS. For Obama leftists, drug use is a personal lifestyle choice, the condemnation of which would be the unpardonable sin of judgmentalism, while legalizers on the Ron Paul fringe right frame the issue around personal responsibility, suggesting it’s paternalistic for government to keep people from putting harmful things in their systems right?
Well, yes, that would be paternalistic DISS…if that were society’s only beef with narcotics as an example. But drugs aren’t like Big Macs or cigarettes. It’s one thing to clog your arteries or ravage your lungs… it’s quite another to consume substances that warp your mind or dull your senses to the point where you become a threat to the rights of others. And despite what the legalizers say, drugs use certainly isn’t victimless—not even when it comes to marijuana, allegedly the safest of the bunch.
And don’t get me started on all the bad that comes with the abusers of alcohol , or anything else used for the sole purpose of intoxication.
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 1:20pmWhat is your definition of mind altering substance? Chocolate releases endorphins that alter the mind of those who eat it. Eating too much chocolate can lead to diabetes. Should we ban chocolate? You nailed it correctly when you said “abuse”. The abuse of any substance can be dangerous, even water.
Report Post »How about cigarettes? They cause second-hand smoke, which has been shown to cause cancer to those who don’t smoke. Should we ban cigarettes?
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 1:52pmDISS. I’m not a smoker, so I have no problem with attempting to keep it away from those who do not smoke and btw, it IS legal like alcohol. The rest of your argument is hogwash asd pot head rationalization not to be taken seriously. Seems we are stuck with alcohol and it’s abusers, so based on that we should rationalize other bad behavior and make things 10x’s worse? I don’t think so.
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 3:55pmI’m not a smoker either ( cigarette or any other substance for that matter ) but i don’t support laws that ban cigarette smoking in public places. That’s the difference between you and i. There are plenty of places that offer smoke free environments. In general, i tend to go to places like that. If i choose to go to a place that allows smoking instead of a place that doesn’t, i’m not going to cry about being offended by all of the second-hand smoke and i’m certainly not going to try to pass laws banning public smoking when there are places that offer a smoke-free alternative. Its called the free market for a reason.
Report Post »wdittgasn
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 5:01pmHey TIME are you at all related to TIMMY??
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on April 22, 2012 at 8:55am@Time
Report Post »What other government regulations do you support?
lukerw
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:31amWHAT Canada is Discriminating… against Gays?
Report Post »SweetDoug
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:52amI wanna know who interrupted my hour of porn with 57 minutes of news!
Not that I would watch gay porn…
But there’s nothing wrong with that…
Not in Canada, at least.
Am I off-base saying it‘s been rather discriminatory that they didn’t balance out the 3 minutes of gay porn, with hetero porn?
Yeah, and the the lesbian porn will need to be in there and of course, dwarf porn as we can’t discriminate against them, either…
I’m smelling a constipational challenge coming! Equality for everyone!
•∆•
Report Post »V-V
biffo
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:15amParents have seen who’s running their schools now…
Report Post »scuba13
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:14amThat wasn’t porn, it was just a California Department of Education teaching video.
Report Post »hi
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:27amso true
Report Post »JACKTHETOAD
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:13amRelax, everybody. It‘s just the ’horned ****-bird’, who is much less of a problem than we think. It‘s his ’meat-puppets’ that are doing the damage. (the hbs is going to have his horns taken out with a pipe wrench very shortly, and the puppets will be lost.)
Report Post »barber2
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:09amCheck out the guys at Adbusters or their buddies at Anonymous ….
Report Post »SweetDoug
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:48amSpeaking of Anonymous, why can’t those guys take down the spammers that send me all that crap in my email. There’s only supposed to be about a dozen firms that are doing all this spam.
Might win them a few fans.
•∆•
Report Post »V-V
rckirby
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 9:59amDemons having fun again!
Report Post »TXPilot
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 10:04amSomeone was pirating cable…….um….b.u.t.t pirating cable, that is…..
Report Post »HorseCrazy
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 9:53amwhy is this happening over and over again? its not an accident folks and who ever made these “errors” needs to be facing charges of showing pornography to minors.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 9:53amThey must have spliced into Bawney Fwank’s private stash.
Report Post »