Media
Adam Carolla Goes Off on Media Coverage of Rutgers Spying Case: ‘Completely F**king Strung This Guy Up’
- Posted on March 30, 2012 at 5:40pm by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »
Comedian Adam Carolla — whose epic rants about the Occupy Wall Street movement and government intrusion have previously been featured on The Blaze — this week gave his take on Dharun Ravi, the former Rutgers University student found guilty earlier this month in a webcam spying case after his gay roommate committed suicide.
Speaking on his podcast, “The Adam Carolla Show,” Carolla went off on the media’s coverage of the case, accusing them of promoting the idea that “we’re a homophobe society.”
Listen to the clip from “The Adam Carolla Show” below, via the Media Research Council (Content warning – very strong language):
(h/t breitbart.com)
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 680 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 639 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 523 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 360 Comments
Have You Seen the Giant ‘Sand Obama’ Sculpture in Charlotte? 312 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 146 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 187 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 146 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Scathing New Ad Capitalizes on Rep. Ryan‘s ’Fading Obama Posters’ Remark 124 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 146 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (78)
Daveed
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 6:37amIt is a militant gay liberal political agenda. Homosexuality is being used like the Sharpton, Jackson, Liberal government, Liberal people of wealth Hollywood use the Blacks, Mexicans and are Service men and women when it is expedient. (every 4 years, then forget about them the rest of time.
Christian and non Christian heretosexuals, I can assure you do not spend time thinking about what goes on behind closed doors of either heretosexuals or homosexuals. The only ones concerned with that appear to be the homosexuals with an agenda. People we need to stop being tools of the Radical Liberal Saul Alinksky Communist loving open society desiring big government greedy global Emperor wanna-b’s. Politically every thing is an agenda expect Freedoms, Free Market Capitalism, Values, Traditions, Western Civilization, ability for the American people to protect themselves from danger, Respect and have been in the cross hairs for a long time.
Report Post »SoupSammich
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 9:00amWell said. I used to have a few really good gay friends, we lost a lot of common ground with the whole special agenda, special, special, hey, we are special, didn’t you know we are special? We should spend billions and retrofit subs and ships to be more female and LGBLT friendly. We are special. The army waste school slots for females to get promotion points, and never use the school- like airborne for example- 5 jump chump lesbians to never jump into combat? Real smart, but they got their wings. Total bs pc poo and it is hilarious to know they are under the same umbrella politically with the other hate and race mongers. Where is the LGBLT faction of CAIR? NBPP?
Report Post »quasar1070
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 12:40pmI second that. Right on mark.
Report Post »WARRIORSCROWN
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 5:58amWhat about Christian-phobia? Why does a homosexual get to tell me I have to accept his morals? Sorry Archon, you don’t make any sense. Be gay if you want (not that you are) but nature points to male and female. If someone is attracted to the same sex then that’s a difficult road to walk, but it’s their road not mine I have my own road to walk. Just because someone like me doesn‘t support same sex marriage doesn’t make me a homophobe or a hate filled, it means I believe in a different set of moral principles. I’m not telling you how to live, that‘s God’s job not mine so do what you want, but don’t expect society to accept your values, we can accept you and that’s all that is required of us.
Report Post »waspanglosaxon
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 4:36amThe East Indian kid was obviously guilty of invading his roomie’s privacy – but a ‘hate crime’? All of this country‘s constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech are being abrogated in the name of ’hate crimes’. Hate is an emotion. And when the government starts outlawing emotions, we’re all in trouble.
Report Post »toto
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 3:17pmTrue. Many of us out in the land of normal know all these things. Thank God for Glen Beck giving us a voice. I hope he gets richer than Rockefeller (ew, he’d that comparison :) ) and that his internet presence continues to grow.
Report Post »Xplorer
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 3:01amok seriously there cannot be that many blaze supporters that are this ignorant that would believe Corolla is correct here….if this is the case, I seriously will re-think my views on everything I believe. If people think there is a case to defend to tape and post on the internet and its okay, I don’t belong to YOUR club anymore. wow, I am in a twilight zone. God Help Us!
Report Post »Dstarr55
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 5:28amCarolla is correct on several of the issues. Also NOTHING was posted to the internet – that was misinformation by the media. The MSM was hyping this story because it fit their narrative of wide spread bullying against gays. I also believe the prosecution was charging Ravi because of the outcry by the gay/lesbian community. I also contend the prosecutor purposely mislead the grand jury by not revealing the prior depression of Clementi and the fact he had taken photos of the GW Bridge before he went to Rutgers. Both of these factors may have lead to the dismissal of the intimidation charges.
The fact is Clementi didn’t jump off the bridge because of Ravi – his suicide note was not released because it did not relate to the charges against Ravi but I contend if the jury was aware that Ravi was not the cause of the suicide he may have been found not guilty on the intimidation charges.
This story reminds me of the Trayvon case – you have a mob screaming for justice which will more than likely force the prosecutor to put forward charges regardless of what the evidence shows. You have the MSM only reporting facts the back their narrative that Zimmerman knowingly shot an unarmed 17 year old because he is a racist. This is not how justice is served in this country – it should not be by mob rule – it should not be by media driven narratives that only report (or distort) facts to fit their agenda. Journalism has died in the MSM but activism is alive and kicking.
Report Post »booboo915
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 8:42amYou must be in the Twilight zone! NOTHING was put on the internet. There were NO vidoes, there were NO pics, NO party, ding dong.
Report Post »blazingaway
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 2:01amCarolla rocks … He is so dialed into the truth and what the f Is going on with the media brainwashing and thier damn agenda to manipulate the naive and stupid into a mob of irrational thought and action … You can’t change evil but evil will change you. …. Just stay away from it…homosexuality is evil. This man was used and sacrificed to the alter of **** worship
Report Post »2Smart2BaLib
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 9:02amawesome post I agree 100%
Report Post »BonnieBlueFlag
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 11:55amHey, Gonzo, Carolla is talking to you!
Report Post »blazingaway
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 1:43amThe school is who should have been put on trail here … Carol RULES … Rock on !
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 12:44am“That‘s about as idiotic a statement as I’ve ever heard.”
Report Post »Oh? Well you obviously haven’t been commenting on here very long then.
“A phobia…irrational fear.”
That’s A definition. To be “phobic” of something CAN mean to fear it, yes, but it can ALSO mean mere dislike or distaste, because, surprise surprise if no one’s told you this, words can have multiple meanings.
Thinking a particular thing shouldn‘t be glorified and promoted isn’t the same as being afraid of it.
“Trying to say…moronic.”
Really? Huh–I didn’t know that the definitions of language were settled, unambiguous, and common to all people.
“The specific purpose of language…”
Again, that’s A purpose, but that purpose is as much fulfilled by ambiguity in language, as it is by a lack of ambiguity. No two people have a perfectly identical conception of any word–each is informed by their own experience of the concept the word represents. The work of communication gets done BOTH in what is INCLUDED and the term, AND what is EXCLUDED. And many words are PURPOSEFULLY more abstract and vague, because the concepts they represent are.
“Using terms like homophobic is just a pathetic attempt at disregarding anything anyone that doesn’t agree with you says by trying to paint them as backwards thinking irrational whackos.”
When you argue one OUGHT avoid homosexual behavior, that is BY DEFINITION (at least mine and others’) homophobic. That might not be a BAD thing inherently,
Jaycen
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 1:27amOh good. “…A defintion…”
Because words often have SO MANY definitions. Phobia means “irrational fear”. It’s Latin, you moron. It means what it means. You probably often miss-use the word, but that doesn‘t change it’s definition, it simply displays your ignorance.
Report Post »Tretka
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 1:44amDid you miss the message or did you just want to ramble in English about the English language. -Geez your post is awful.
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 2:13amHow would you define a word OTHER than how people use it?
Report Post »luxomni
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 7:03amIf I had to pick the one thing that I most object to in Progressives, it would be the quicksilver like way they try to alter standards to support their positions.I am not referring to sexual standards here. I am referring to meanings of words. .A dictionary is a standard book of words. It exists so when someone, even Archon, says a word everyone else knows what the word he said meant. Even the most fluid slang dictionary exists for that purpose. You can say a word to mean anything you wish, Archon. But we will hear it as the definition in the book.
Report Post »But it is other standards that Progressives eschew too. Moral standards, of course. But even beyond that, they wish to amend our entire social contract. The Constitution was the common rules that we groups of citizens called states agreed to become a nation. The contract was rather specific. There was no interaction of the United States Government with the people. It was not the people’s republic it was United States. The people interacted with their state. Under that system, their would be no Obamacare. It wouldn’t be dreamed of, the Federal Government making the citizens of the states do anything. But the Progressives with flexible definitions and flexible standards controlling the Federal Government constantly unilaterally violate and abridge that contract. No good can come of that.
RJJinGadsden
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 8:54amTHE THIRD ARCHON, Ahhh, the classic school of “What the definition of ‘is’ is.” You’ve boogered up the definition of the word by trying to make it mean what you want, and now you want to cry that everybody else uses it that way. Words do mean things, and they have specific definitions. Try not using the word incorrectly then.
Report Post »Thevoice
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 11:34pmBeck would have been wise to give Carolla his own daily show…If he after the youth…
Report Post »MR_ANDERSON
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 12:26amHe already has a show, and he is doing a great job. Glenn would only hamper Carolla because so many people would not want to support Glenn Beck to listen to Carolla. The young people would accuse him of selling out for money.
GBTV can’t be the only outlet, there needs to be outlets of our ideology all across America.
Report Post »wdittgasn
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 11:04pmI think homophobia is a legit thing. Imagine if Abraham’s nephew Lot would have hung around in Sodom and Gomorrah, he would have been toast like the rest. The destruction of these two cities was done as an example to us. what part of homosexuality is an ABOMINATION do the people not get.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 10:18pmIf being Gay is acceptable… why would a Gay commit suicide over Gay Sex, unless he considered it to be a Perversion?
Report Post »mils
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 11:47pmit’s not what the student thought about his sexuality..it’s what others think and judge…esp his parents, loved o nes that did not know that he was gay.
Report Post »sillyfreshness
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 10:08pmHad the victim not been gay, the max charge would have been some “violation of privacy” tort, but since he was a meat eater, then we throw on dozens of felony charges. This just goes to prove that PC Bolshevik “hate crime” laws are unconstitutional since they aren’t applied equally. Hence, a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
BTW, has anyone looked at this article about how the US has become communistic? This lays is all out in how it happened and compares it to the Red Revolution in Russia in 1917.
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/15-03-2012/120788-demise_russia_usa-0/
Report Post »godhatesacoward
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 9:28pmAh……The lack of common sense is un-believable these days.
Report Post »thespank
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 9:07pmThis guy is really cool. I began to recall a book of history I had read in the past when he was interpreting the media agenda.Something about a false prophet or something. Watch as history inevetibley repeats. Fasten your seatbelts.
Report Post »PimpleJuice
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 8:41pmHis computer. His remote access. His stuff he was protecting. Dorm rooms are small. Not like he hooked cams up in a 2 bedroom 900 sq ft apartment. He had honest intentions on protecting his stuff. I bet it was his girlfriend he ran her mouth to others that brought light on him. What an outrage. I’m actually sticking up for this **********. Everybody thinks you hate all towel heads because you joke and ask if their a push start or a pull start. I say all of this in a loving way. I’m sure the make fun of my pollack ass when I try to pull open a push open a 7/11 store door.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 8:27pmI found it scary that they punished this guy for an anti-homosexual crime. They should have just punished him for invasion of privacy. It doesn’t matter what his beliefs are. He also got way too harsh of a sentence.
Rapists and child molesters get less time in jail than Davi got.
Report Post »Naram-Sin
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 12:28amIt was his room! It’s not even evasion of privacy. I’ve lived in a dorm, and anyone who thinks that you have any kind of expectation of privacy not only an idiot, but they’re insane.
Some advice here. We all think that the jury system is a wonderful sacred thing. It’s not. It was developed so you didn’t have to hold a red hot iron in your hand to see if you were innocent. And it is a great improvement over that. But here is the problem. We try to get a jury of people who don’t know anything about the case (not a jury of your peers, they might now what was going on), and when try to do that there is a good chance that you’re going to get some idiots on the jury. If you‘re innocent don’t ever trust your life to twelve idiots!Never go with a jury, go with a judge (if he’s biased you can have him disqualified, it also easier to look at his reasoning on appeal).
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 8:09pm“Speaking on his podcast, “The Adam Carolla Show,” Carolla went off on the media’s coverage of the case, accusing them of promoting the idea that “we’re a homophobe society.””
Report Post »1) We ARE a homophobic society, both by majority and in terms of our institutions of law. In the overwhelming majority of states, institutionalized legal discrimination against petitioners for marital licenses on the basis of sexual orientation is the rule not the exception.
2) ~70-80% of the population, depending upon who is counting, self-identifies as “Christian.” Even if only half take a more conservative theological stance on homosexuality (and I would BET it is way more than half that do) that’s still ~35-40% of the TOTAL population that believes homosexuality is CATEGORICALLY immoral and believes in legal discrimination against the same.
3) What Dharun Ravi did was by DEFINITION homophobic in act, even if he personally has no investment in homophobia (other than for kicks, or because it’s, and even conservatives ADMIT this, considered “non-normative” as defined by the current social norms).
Git-R-Done
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 8:30pmSo what? Excuse me if I don’t want to live in a society where I go to jail just b/c I don’t have politically correct beliefs.
It’s pathetic how you support giving Davi a harsher sentence than a rapist or child molester would get.
Report Post »ChiefGeorge
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 8:39pmWhat he did was crass and a invasion of ones personal privacy….if he had been making out with a girl no one would care which would still be an invasion of privacy. I do not support the gay lifestyle but I do not interfer with their choice to do what they do. My choice is to be hetero and I should not be forced to accept a lifestyle of any kind in which I disagree with and believe is immoral and unhealthy. Just like I do not support drug use and robbing banks but of which are immoral and unhealthy.
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 8:46pm“So what? Excuse me if I don’t want to live in a society where I go to jail just b/c I don’t have politically correct beliefs.”
Huh, I must have missed the memo about the United States outlawing certain beliefs…oh wait, they NEVER did that. (and it would have to be a constitutional amendment besides). Moreover, MOST Leftists, myself included, AREN’T advocating that it should be illegal to express ANY belief, we just disagree about which beliefs should form the basis of LAWS to which we are ALL beholden. If you want to have your own private club where you hate gays, racial minorities, other religions, and Leftists–by all means, be my guest. If your ACTIONS, however, pursuant to these beliefs break laws (such as if you pursue violence against these groups) such that a rights trade-off is invoked, THEN in that (different case from mere belief) case, yes, you can’t PRESUME immunity for your actions JUST because they were motivated by personal beliefs (otherwise NOTHING would be prohibited).
“It’s pathetic how you support giving Davi a harsher sentence than a rapist or child molester would get.”
Report Post »Uh…where did I ever defend a particular sentence for Davi? I just think he should be held criminally liable for his harassment which led to the suicide of his roommate–the judge, jury, and the law are more competent to set the sentence than me. Obviously, rapists (of children or otherwise) should be held accountable under the law–that really has nothing to do w
Crush_Liberalism
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 9:01pmPhobic is a liberal bully word meaning irrational fear.Those who object to homosexuality are not “phobic”. They don’t fear anything. They HAVE a reason for their objection, you just happen to DISAGREE with it. It is the likes of you and others who believe that they are entitled to their own terminology and that the rest of society is obligated to submit to those engineered terms.
Report Post »Ex; It is illegal is many states for close family members, consenting adults, to engage in sexual behavior. For instance, Massachusetts issues a penalty of up to 20 years’ imprisonment for those engaging in sexual activities with relatives closer than first cousins and Hawaii up to 5 years in jail for “sexual penetration” with certain blood relatives and in-laws. Are these “phobic”? Nope. These laws reflect a moral objection to sex between consenting adults (and marriage between those adults). No fierce outrage there – why? Cuz many who are morality-phobic support gay marriage but personally agree with regulation against incestuous marriage – but the fact is, there is no claim that there is an irrational fear (phobia) against prohibiting an adult from marrying his adult sister. Why? .Convenient oversight, no? Let me guess: That’s “different”.
Sure, the claim to be concerned for potential offspring is often falsely used, but what if no child is conceived? It‘s gross anyway isn’t it? Opposing gay marriage is NOT phobic, and YOU wield NOT the power to “proclaim” it as “phobic”. Y
The Third Archon
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 9:17pm“Those who object to homosexuality are not “phobic”. They don’t fear anything. They HAVE a reason for their objection, you just happen to DISAGREE with it. It is the likes of you and others who believe that they are entitled to their own terminology and that the rest of society is obligated to submit to those engineered terms.”
Report Post »Well, 1) “Phobic” as I use it, and most people use it, simply means a general hatred, fear, or aversion to something. Thus, those that think homosexuality is wrong and should be avoided are, by definition, homophobic. I don’t doubt that they have reasons, poor ones in my opinion, why they think that there’s nothing WRONG or IMMORAL with being homophobic.
2) Everyone defines their own terms for themselves–it’s called language. The majority of political arguments are about competing definitions. And you are the only person, by definition, who can define what language means for you. I COULDN’T do what you claim, nor could anyone else, even if I want to, since the power of assent to belief cannot be alienated by any means we yet know of, nor would it be a good idea to do so (and nor are most people advocating) even IF we COULD.
The Third Archon
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 9:23pm“Ex; It is illegal is many states for close family members, consenting adults, to engage in sexual behavior. For instance, Massachusetts issues a penalty of up to 20 years’ imprisonment for those engaging in sexual activities with relatives closer than first cousins and Hawaii up to 5 years in jail for “sexual penetration” with certain blood relatives and in-laws. Are these “phobic”? Nope. These laws reflect a moral objection to sex between consenting adults (and marriage between those adults).”
Well, actually, they are by definition “incest-phobic,” though as you point out, yes, it’s not as popular a phenomena to identify it as such because of the different place it holds in the public conception (and I don‘t think that’s an accident–I am quite ready to admit the reasoning for such prohibitions on incest are BETTER, at least more objectively based, than those against homosexuality). That doesn’t mean that we are RIGHT to have such sensibilities however. There are better, more objective reasons, why incest (especially when it results in reproduction) is less popular than homosexuality, but the fact of the matter is that if it‘s between two consenting adults and doesn’t effect others, it SHOULDN’T be illegal–what compelling interest DOES the state of Massachusetts serve exactly, with laws against consensual interest among adults?
I believe in TRUE individualism, not just the conservative rhetoric, but ACTUALLY empowering people to make THEIR OWN ch
Report Post »wo12b1
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 9:45pmThe Third Archon
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 9:17pm I don’t doubt that they have reasons, poor ones in my opinion, why they think that there’s nothing WRONG or IMMORAL with being homophobic.
I don’t doubt that you have reasons, poor ones in my opinion, why you think that there’s nothing WRONG or IMMORAL with being homosexual.
Report Post »Lord_Frostwind
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 9:58pm“Homophobic” is a misnomer, there isn’t really anything about homosexuals that I fear. I just don’t like a lot of them.
Report Post »They act like they don’t need peoples approval, but go out of their way all the time seeking approval from people like me.
They can’t stop blaming people like me for the depression issues that seem to run rampant in the LGBTQ community.
And the coup de grace, they preach tolerance and love and all that fluffy wonderful gobalty ****, then when you disagree with them they turn around and label you something, say horrible things about what you believe, and then demand you treat them better, lest they taunt you a second time.
To reiterate, homophobia is not what I experience. I experience being “sick of your ridiculous excuses” syndrome. So don’t act like I have some mental problem or that I need to be coddled by a psychiatrist, I’m making a personal choice in who I associate with and what I think of people in clear conscious.
Rowgue
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 11:19pmThat‘s about as idiotic a statement as I’ve ever heard. A phobia by definition is an irrational fear. Thinking a particular thing shouldn‘t be glorified and promoted isn’t the same as being afraid of it. Trying to say that every person defines their own terms their own way and saying it’s language is moronic. The specific purpose of language is to have a CONSISTENT method for people to communicate with one another. Using terms like homophobic is just a pathetic attempt at disregarding anything anyone that doesn’t agree with you says by trying to paint them as backwards thinking irrational whackos.
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 12:24am“Homophobic”…I just don’t like a lot of them.”
Report Post »Yes, and again I will repeat, “homophobic” does not JUST mean “afraid of gays” but more broadly having a negative opinion of homosexuality–i.e. viewing as undesirable, in other words, in an ideal world, nonexistent.
“They act like…LGBTQ community.”
Well, no, it’s not that they need your APPROVAL, simply that they need you to not codify your OPINION on their behavior into law, that’s all they are asking.
“And the coup…a second time.”
Well yeah–all they want is to be treated the same under the law, rather than different, as is the case in the status quo.
“To reiterate…I think of people in clear conscious.”
And again, I reiterate, if that includes treating homosexuals differently, because of a dislike for them, then BY DEFINITION you are a homophobe as I have defined it. Now, you may think that’s perfectly acceptable, and indeed you may be right (there may be legitimate reasons to be a homophobe), but that doesn’t change the objective fact that your are LITERALLY doing the exact things (treating differently on the basis of dislike) by which I (and many many others) define “phobic” behavior.
Git-R-Done
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 2:50amObviously the judge and jury aren‘t all that competent or else they wouldn’t give him a harsher sentence than a rapist or a child molester.
And he was punished for anti-homosexual bigotry, which is thought policing.
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 3:07am“And he was punished for anti-homosexual bigotry, which is thought policing.”
Report Post »Harassing your roommate until he commits suicide goes A LITTLE past “thought.”
LowIQGenius
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 3:52amArchon, let me use your format:
“Well, 1) ‘Phobic’ as I use it, and most people use it, simply means a general hatred, fear, or aversion to something. Thus, those that think homosexuality is wrong and should be avoided are, by definition, homophobic.”
Allow me to be the first to inform you that, by my own definition and those of a majority which I just made up, you are the a classic representation of both a pedophile and an arsonist, and I believe you should be treated as such.
Remember, all leftist arguments come in one of the following forms: Sexist, Intolerant, Xenophobic, Homophobic, Islamophobic, Racist, Bigoted
Report Post »Skee
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 12:10pmRavi’s actions were not homophobic.
Report Post »His intentions during his actions would or would not make them homophobic.
If I turn on the video on my computer during a hetrosexual encounter
does that make me hetrophobic? It’s called intend to do harm. Ravi was a victim
of a modern day witch hunt because homosexuals are a protected voting
block.
Git-R-Done
Posted on April 1, 2012 at 4:37pmArchon – Ravi didn’t make him commit suicide nor does he bear any responsibility for Clementi committing suicide.
Report Post »Lord_Frostwind
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 7:29pmI do hate it how different groups blame me when their members take their lives. “Oh you Mormons are so bad, you make people kill themselves because you weren’t nice to them.” Go cry me a frakkin river, He chose to jump of the bridge himself, He took the cowards way out.
Report Post »Lord_Frostwind
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 9:50pm*off
Report Post »So
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 7:23pmI am sick of hearing about gays! Live and let live. Don’t push it in our faces.
It’s not homophobia. It’s ****-overdoneia.
Give it a rest already. Geesh.
Report Post »Rainbow Dash
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 7:18pmI love me a good ol’ Adam Carolla rant
Report Post »Workforit
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 8:39pmYep, me too!
I just love it when Adam hits the nail on the head and pounds it all the way through the board!
The MSM’s (corporate/elite) media’s…( There is nothing “Main Stream” about it) agenda could not be more clearly exposed, well done Adam!
What cracks me up is how many people really think this story is about some gay dude…
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on March 31, 2012 at 9:16amWORKFORIT, LOL, yeah like THE THIRD (LORD) ARCHON. He’s been pushing his gay agenda so much here that I think that he has actually stepped out of his closet now.
Report Post »frust@ted
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 6:54pmI think Davi is a pile of dung for what he did to his roomate. I would have thought this way if the video would have been his roomate with a woman or a man, I really don’t care, you shouldn’t treat anyone that way. The suicide is tragic as well, Davi may have contributed to this mans depresion that lead to the suicide, but he did not kill him.
Report Post »Salamander
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 7:29pmWhat did he DO to his roommate? He didn‘t ’out’ him. He didn’t film him. He HAD to room with him. He HAD to deal with his depression. He HAD to deal with his roommate‘s ’friend’. And, now, he gets to go to jail for his roommate’s suicide!
Report Post »thop1960
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 7:34pmI’m curious, are you a guy or girl? If a guy, were you ever 18? If so, did you ever act like a douche? If no, congratulations, you just did.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 6:29pmWhy can’t Ravi sue the media?
Report Post »vinnymac46
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 6:14pmCome on Adam…the missing link is Davi is not B-L-A-C-K…
Report Post »DesertDave54
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 6:42pmVinny- you hit that one outta the park…
Report Post »But- as Davi IS a “person of color”, you‘d think they’d have given him a pass.
But not.
disenlightened
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 5:53pm100% correct. The mainstream media once again leads a KKK-clone lynch mob designed to firmly entrench gay lifestyles in this country and spread fear among anyone who even remotely disagrees. P*ss on them. What the young man did was mean-spirited, but criminal? No. I’ll never accept homosexuality as an equal to heterosexuality.
Report Post »Sirfoldallot
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 5:50pmIt’s called “ WackadoodalDummocraticphbia ” thats what my Doc say’s I have.
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 5:49pmIf his roommate wasn’t gay, but still committed suicide, there would be no story and no charges ever filed. The homosexual agenda wins again. Yet another person convicted via the media. Cancel your flippin cable! Stop subsidizing CNN and MSNBC. Go streaming. Pay for only the channels you want.
Have you cancelled you’re cable yet? What the bloody dickens are you waiting for?
Have you cancelled yet?
Waiting…
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 5:59pmI cant…I am addicted to American Idol and Jersey Shore. I was to learn to sing and be a Guido….from Texas….
Report Post »aragona
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 6:02pmAmerican Idol is available for free over the airways. Jersey Shore is, at a minimum, available on Hulu+ I don‘t watch it so that’s just a quick google.
I cancelled my TV about 2 years ago and bought a $10 digital antenna from Walmart. I share a subscription to Netflix with my daughter. That is the extent of my TV viewing. You know what? I don’t miss cable TV one little bit.
Report Post »FlowerBell
Posted on March 30, 2012 at 9:51pmExcellent. I will be doing the same once my cable contract is up. Yes, I honor my obligations.
Report Post »