Crime

Alleged Anonymous Member Hacks Abortion Clinic 26,000 Times in Six Hours to Expose ‘Murder’

James Jeffery was adamant about exposing a British pregnancy center that performs services such as abortions and the women who have contacted it. So much so that he tried to hack into the center’s database 26,000 times — within six hours.

PC World reports Jeffery, who appears to be a member of the hacker collective Anonymous, was successful at obtaining the names of women who contacted the British Pregnancy Advisory System for information about abortion, sterilization and contraceptives. Although, he did not access not their medical records, he did threaten to expose the names of these women.

Jeffery was arrested last week and plead guilty in court to this infiltration of center’s system. According to a statement by the center, Jeffery had also defaced the center’s website on March 8, which has since been restored. Here’s what the BPAS said in a statement about the hack:

This incident appears to be the most extreme example of what is now a very concerning escalation of anti-abortion activity aimed at providers and women who need their services.

Around 26,000 attempts to break into our website were made over a six hour period, but the hacker was unable to access any medical or personal information relating to women who had received treatment at bpas. The website does store details (names, addresses and phone numbers) of people who have requested information from bpas via the website, including those making personal inquiries as well as health and education professionals, the media and students. These may have been inquiries relating to contraception, pregnancy, abortion, STI testing and sterilisation. Relevant authorities were informed and appropriate legal action taken to prevent the dissemination of any information obtained from the website.

While the confidentiality of women receiving treatment was never in danger, this episode was taken very seriously indeed. A court injunction was obtained to prevent the publication of the data and, in the early hours of this morning an arrest was made.

PC World reports that Jeffery admitted on Twitter that his intent was to release the names he obtained because “they kill unborn children that have no rights. It’s murder.”

British Pregnancy Center Hacker Arrested for 26,000 Attempts to Obtain Information

According to News 24, the 27-year-old had obtained 10,000 records of women’s names and inquiries.

Comments (97)

1 2
  • ssbstspd
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:58pm

    I dont trust this. Something is up. This annoynomous club has been going around stealing alot of information from alot of different corporations then all of a sudden they hit an abortion clinic and they get caught the next day ? YEA RIGHT.

    Report Post » ssbstspd  
    • Onowicit
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:38pm

      I’m with you. Don’t believe it. profile does not fit.

      Report Post » Onowicit  
    • GoliathOnline
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:25pm

      *Alleged Anonymous Member.. but Anonymous, is just a name to hide behind for any hacker it seems. so some, i would presume, would be better and trickier than others, each of them fighting for a different cause and such.. i dont see any organization when it comes to this group, more like a bunch of internet vigilantes

      Report Post » GoliathOnline  
    • KevINtampa
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:44pm

      Sigh.

      There is no such thing as a group of people called Anonymous. It’s an idea. That’ it. That’s all. The hackers that hacked Sony are not the hackers that hacked the FBI call in London; in any way, shape, or form. Sure they both did it under the veil of Anonymous, but so could you, and that’s the point.

      The idea of Anonymous is that anyone can hack under the same anonymity as someone else. It’s the idea of safety in numbers. It makes the hack harder to trace. A better way of saying is: It makes the hack harder to profile.

      Also, this guy’s hack is the simplest of hall “hacks” because it really isn’t a hack. All he did was run a dictionary against the root password on the server 26,000 times. That’s not that hard. Most 13 year olds with a PS3 could figure out how to code that. He wasn’t looking for a flaw to expose, he was just brute forcing his way in.

      It’s like a burglar that just knocks your door down instead of picking the lock. It’s also why you should never pick a password that can be found in a dictionary. And liberty1 is just as easy to crack as liberty, or liberty123. Don’t be a moron, use a strong password.

      And remember, anyone is anonymous and can use it as cover, including your favorite intelligence agency.

      Report Post »  
    • Onowicit
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 9:04pm

      @ Kevintampa….don’t be so defensive. They are the ones making the stink about being a group. A Hacker is just that, a Hacker. They claim to be Anonymous. They claim to be Legion. They encourage the group think. Yes anyone can call themselves Anonymous but THEY are THEY a WE. Don’t romanticize THESE, THOSE,or THEM. I ONOWICIT think THEY SUCK whoever THEY are. My password is ANONYMOUSUCKS. is that in the dictionary?

      Report Post » Onowicit  
    • CaptainSpaulding
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 9:24pm

      Yeah – it’s hard to believe a bunch of liberal radicals would go after one of their own.

      Report Post »  
    • timworx
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 9:30pm

      @ONOWICIT I don’t see @KEVINTAMPA as being defensive. He was really filling a few holes in the story. It’s always nice to see someone commenting with more to add to the story, instead of just their opinion/reaction.

      Just a note on that Twitter picture: That isn’t an “Anonymous” twitter account – it was that guys personal twitter, with Anonymous’ logo as the profile pic.

      Report Post »  
    • JoshthetalkLashley77
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:56pm

      There not a real organization they have no real agenda research it a little all they do is make fake profiles to social networking sights try to find each other then the really smart ones have the ability to hack and do it well to me its not a surprise this guy got caught, he was doing it by himself making him easier to track plus he also left a trail each time he hacked that sight 26000 times a blind man could follow that he goofed basically

      Report Post »  
    • EndTheFedNOW
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:03pm

      Dude anonymous is just the Feds posing as radicals to create false flag operations.

      Report Post » EndTheFedNOW  
    • ishka4me
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:05pm

      anaonymous is for abortion. If a hacking ocured it wasn’t annonymous. My thoughts is it is another stephanopolis moment

      Report Post »  
    • Onowicit
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:07pm

      @timworx Yes, he is defending the idea that THEY want you to think about them. Certainly you don’t think that this is just an Electronic Evolution. Anonymous is a creation not just an idea. There is a hierarchy to the ORGAN-ISM. It started with the IDEA of fighting Scientology, but in the the past two years it has become a tool of manipulation, SOCIAL manipulation. Just as in all SECRET society‘s they prey on the opportunity afforded them by the WANT TO BE’s. Don’t Kid yourself they are organized. True hackers have respect and code,NO PUN INTENDED. Don’t be fooled by the cool V mask. the people running the show love this IDEA that THEY are No ONE. THEY are LEGION. Remember there is no such thing as bad advertising. This story is a stinker….yea they are anonymous.

      Report Post » Onowicit  
    • Pucci
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:08am

      This is false flag!

      Report Post » Pucci  
    • dudironimis
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:23am

      You have to understand something about anonymous, they are exactly what their name suggests. Most members don’t even know each other. And anyone can claim to be part of the organization, because there are no records of who are and are not. There can be some top notch hackers and some people that can’t even build a website, but try to hack with some online tutorials.This guy tried 26,000 times. He was obviously not the best hacker they had.

      Report Post »  
    • closetotheedge
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 9:44am

      It’s murder.And now with a few who claim post-abortion up to 2yrs old is a right,can we remain silent to this genicide of the most innocent,in the name of choice? Never! The evil in the World is rampit and out of control.We give over $44omil in tax $s to PPH in the states and they claim it’s for breast exams, when the main goal is in abortions.Mr Obama sined the FOCA,the Freedom of Choice Act that says a female can get an abortion at anytime,anywhere,for any reason and by any way.And they say it’s a right? What do you think? Mass Murder as a right.

      Report Post »  
    • Shelle9999
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 10:22am

      I don’t trust this either… reminds me of how our gov tricked us into signing the Patriot Act so that whenever they decide someone is a terrorist they can take action against them… in my opinion this is their attempt at being able to hide arresting people and calling them terrorist when really they may not have even done anything at all except p1ss off the gov.

      Report Post » Shelle9999  
    • PaxInVeritate
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:07pm

      @KEVINTAMPA
      I agree with you to a point. However, there is a core group of elite black hats (from the 1980′s) who do know each other and formed the initial “Anonymous” under subgroups like the Peoples Liberation Front. The ideology behind these subgroups are for the most part anarchists. As time progressed these initial subgroups allowed other younger hackers and wannabes to glom on through the ever growing message boards and burgeoning social medias. But they are not the inner core group. Think about it. Who benefits from youthful idealism that has hedonistic, antisocial tendencies and are easily manipulate? What a great buffer zone from those you wish to attack. Anonymous maybe an amoebic online entity, but there is a discernible undercurrent associated with it. Consider Julian Assange’s objectives for “open” world governments, and the connection between Wikileaks and Anonymous. Standalone my fanny.

      Report Post » PaxInVeritate  
  • teddrunk
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:28pm

    Why use the term “women who have had abortions”. Call them what they really are………murderers.

    Report Post »  
    • kim
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 8:39am

      ii agree with you they are all murderers. if you can lay down and have sex you should take care of what happens

      Report Post »  
  • Copo
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:00pm

    Did Anonymous just do something in the name of life, in the name of goodness… did they just defend the life of the unborn. Never thought I’d see the day, I’m not going to commend their previous actions nor will I stand with them, but they did something good for once and regardless of who it is, it is none the less good.

    Report Post » Copo  
  • skippy6
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:55pm

    Do not buy into this!!!! Anonymous hacker is most likely not telling the whole truth, I believe he does not care about what abortion clinics do, they are just trying to get you to believe they are on your side!!!

    Report Post » skippy6  
  • thegreatcarnac
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:36pm

    Moral…don‘t have an abortion or ’anonymous will expose you.

    Report Post »  
  • bornagaincowgirl
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:16pm

    Nothing this guy did is comendable and I’m pro-life. You don’t fight evil with evil. You fight evil with good. What this guy did was destructive.

    Report Post »  
    • christos
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:33pm

      After 38 years of abortion you have failed…exactly what is your definition of “fighting evil with good” suggest rearranging your thoughts or throw in the towel…

      Report Post » christos  
    • Right_on_the_Left_Coast
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:06pm

      As a fellow christian, I partially disagree with you. When Paul preached the gospel, what he was doing was against the law… or at least the law as dictated by the government of that day. He argued that he had a greater responsibility to God than to men.

      In keeping with that sentiment, I do not think we should ever do anything that violates God’s law in any respect… but sometimes following God’s law means breaking human law.

      So I would oppose any effort to harm or attack someone who does abortions… but if there was a way to non-violently stop them from murdering anymore babies, I would pursue that with a clean conscience… even if it were illegal. There is nothing that I know of that would accomplish this. But if you really believe that babies are being slaughtered by the thousands, how could you stand by and not do whatever you could to save them?

      I respect what this hacker tried to do. He broke the law, but he did it while trying to uphold a higher law. He saw something that he could do to save lives, and went for it. That is admirable.

      Report Post » Right_on_the_Left_Coast  
    • hidden_lion
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:19pm

      Exposing the names of woman who kill their children is not evil. Killing the babies for their own convenience is evil.

      Report Post » hidden_lion  
    • bornagaincowgirl
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:25pm

      How about the battle belongs to the Lord and we are to obey Him, this is not how God would work, this is, however, the exact method of satan. To love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, soul and strength and to do unto others as you would have them do unto you, also, thou shalt not steal. This man broke into someone’s “house”, stole information to use against other people in shaming them publicly. Christ never shamed anyone publicly. If its okay for this guy to publicly humiliate these women, then it would also be his right to break into your house, someplace you felt safe, and shame you or someone in your family with public humiliation concerning a sin of your past.

      Report Post »  
    • inblack
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:30pm

      @BORNAGAINCOWGIRL

      I tried to make sense of your position…
      I tried a few analogies:
      1) Ministers who raped children are going in to have their identity covered up
      2) German informants who are providing the names of jews in hiding
      3) Men who are gaining religious permission to honor kill their wives or daughters

      Would you expose them? Would you do anything to try to stop them?

      While I will never support anonymous as a group, (and I am very suspicious of this news), I cannot see how impeding abortions is a bad thing.

      If the world ever regains it’s soul, the people of the future will look back on us with the same incredulous disdain that most people have for the WWII German people.

      “They must not have known. They were too scared to act.”
      No, they probably listened to your argument while Millions of children were slaughtered.

      Report Post »  
    • ShyMan
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:37pm

      Bornagaincowgirl

      The Hebrew women disobeyed pharaoh and lied about it too when he wanted the babies killed. And God blessed them for it.

      Amen

      Report Post » ShyMan  
    • TheCurator
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:53pm

      A famous clergyman once said, in effect, “sometimes one must do evil to defeat evil”, like killing Hitler in 1938 and saving 50 million lives. That said, I agree that this is suspect. Perhaps A was hoping to snag some notable conservative or Catholic attempting to secure a termination of pregnancy.

      Report Post »  
    • bornagaincowgirl
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:09pm

      If one is led by God then one must do what one must do. But you better know Him and His Ways and His Voice. There is a very fine line between the flesh and the spirit and you better be able to discern it. Submitted to God and His Will. Not what I believe, not what I think, however right I may think I am. What is Your Will, oh God?

      Report Post »  
    • weremoose
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 4:10pm

      Protecting the weak is doing unto others as you would have them do to you. Turning a blind eye to the plight of the weak due to some sense of religiosity, apathy or cowardliness is exactly what Jesus was condemning in parable of the Samaritan.

      My wife was almost aborted. Shame saved her life. If shame can be a weapon in our fight for the lives of other children, then we are remiss in our responsibility to God if we fail to use it.

      Report Post » weremoose  
    • christos
      Posted on March 15, 2012 at 7:09pm

      @BORNAGAINCOWGIRL—Mans laws are not +JESUS+GODS+ laws,you said “there is a fine line between the flesh and the spirit” where in the Bible did you read this,,,when your born again your flesh becomes spirit,,,you have conquered the flesh through +JESUS CHRIST+ what if this principle of Fine Line was used when the Jewish and Polish and others were being executed,,,

      Report Post » christos  
  • LouC57
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:12pm

    I don‘t buy that this guy’s one of the Anonymous, but anything about them could be true…it just seems like a disconnect.

    Report Post »  
    • FL_Catholic
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:05pm

      I agree – especially since Anonymous hacked the Vatican website to protest their stances on contraception and gay marriage.

      It’s either 1) someone using the name “Anonymous” as a cover for their illegal hacking, or 2) an Anonymous member trying to smear pro-lifers as people willing to hack databases and reveal private medical data.

      My money is on option 2.

      Report Post »  
    • ZomBrad
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 6:34pm

      Get outta my mind FL! lol

      Who knows, maybe he IS a member of anonymous….but has his own opinion…..thus he failed because of not conforming to the herd……

      Sadly…I’m still inclined to agree with FL_Catholic…

      Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:00pm

      I can totally see them protesting to support gay rights and contraception while at the same time discouraging abortion. They understand liberty the way Ron Paul does in many cases. They to me appear to be quite common sense harboring people unlike people who identify themselves with ideologies on Left and the Right. To the left, they will seem like they are crazy conservatives attacking big government, to the right they will seem like progressive anarchists out to create a socialist world. Don’t worry, they’re likely smarter than you and are not in between right and left but above it.

      Report Post »  
  • NewLife56
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:08pm

    I can’t wait till he releases it, fantastic work

    Report Post » NewLife56  
  • DisarmoniaMundi
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:04pm

    Anon isn‘t like what you’d think it is. The only cohesion that exists to the entire collective is that each individual ranges from fair proficiency to extreme proficiency with computers.

    Obviously Anon can easily be exploited by leftists; they have better organization on the internet at the moment.

    Report Post »  
  • jackact
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:03pm

    There was a time in American history where these actions would have been considered a ‘commendable effort’.
    We must bring back that time again..
    Abortion is murder.
    Centrally planned government is the executioner.

    Report Post »  
  • bullcrapbuster
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:01pm

    The law is quick to protect the baby killers.

    Report Post » bullcrapbuster  
  • 45
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:55pm

    I am shocked that so many comments are in favor of anyone hacking abortion clinic information. We all have the right for our medical decisions NOT to be made public. What about gun ownership information? Shouldn’t everyone know who has what guns? And before the liberal lover comments start just understand that I am a conservative that looks at the whole picture. Also I am a father of 4 and am against abortion. Remember the Bible tells us that we should Love the person and hate the sin!

    Report Post »  
    • Doctor MD
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:58pm

      Very nice, good response

      Report Post »  
    • weremoose
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:15pm

      Actually, it’s a very poor response. Let’s start with the cliché that we should love the sinner and hate the sin. This maxim is never intended to imply that we as a christian society allow lawlessness without consequences. If abortion is murder, and it is, then it is murder. It is against the law as murder whether the government chooses to enforce the law or not. If the government will not protect the rights of its citizens, then it falls to the citizens to do so themselves. We are a nation of laws, not of men.
      The comparison to gun ownership is weak as well. If every time a gun was purchased, a child died, then yes, we would have a responsibility to bring out the names of the people responsible. That’s the difference. Every abortion means a dead child. A dead child! This is not a “medical decision”. This is a decision to sacrifice the life of another human being because that life is inconvenient for you. Your right to privacy does not trump the child’s right to life.

      Report Post » weremoose  
    • hidden_lion
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:22pm

      Recreational Abortion isn’t a medical decision. It is murder.

      Report Post » hidden_lion  
    • inblack
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:41pm

      @45

      We make sexual offenders list themselves in a public database.
      How is someone who kills their child in more need of compassion?

      We not only love the sinner, the media make heroes out of them.
      Until we hold women responsible for this act of murder, the practice will never stop.

      I think if you care so much for privacy over life, you need to review that claim about not being a liberal.

      Report Post »  
    • weremoose
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:34pm

      @inblack

      Nailed it.

      Report Post » weremoose  
    • objectivetruth
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 9:29am

      Good response.To the rest of the posters.How about we try this.It is now legal to publish all your medical information.Yes all of it.That includes your problems with your prostate.Impotence exc.How about we hold women accountable?How about you get a vascetomy so you don’t ever have to worry about her getting pregnant.That way she need not ever have to make the decision.Better yet grow up and realize that the world is made of shades of gray ,not the pretty little black and white picture you think it is.Then again you would hae to face the fact that not every thing goes as planned.Something you neurotic types can’t handle.

      Report Post »  
    • weremoose
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:39am

      @objective
      Again. None of those things involve the murder of children. Case closed. Expose the murderers, this is not a medical privacy issue.

      Report Post » weremoose  
    • weremoose
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:49am

      Oh and Objective,
      I’d gladly stand naked in Times Square with all of my medical information and all my sins and anything else anyone wanted to know written in sharpie all over my body if it meant I could save just one of the millions of murdered children. So would most individuals who value the life of the innocent. Your efforts to turn this into a privacy issue is ineffective in addition to being flawed logic.

      Report Post » weremoose  
    • objectivetruth
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:56pm

      @weremoose
      Appropriate handle for you.Big bulky running into things missing a few brain cells.Medical privacy includes all forms of medical treatment.Not just what you pick and choose.Abortion isn’t a crime in this country.Whether you think it is, is irrelevant,I defend the rights of church not to be ruled by the state in its doctrines.I also defend the government not to be run by religions.You are entitled to your own moral and religious doctrines.You aren’t allowed to impose them on others against their will.This includes a deluded belief that women are murderers for getting an abortion.You nor anyone else has the right to expose them shun them exc on a large scale.If you wish to do that to someone in your own camp thats on you and them.You don’t have the right to do so to anyone else.

      Report Post »  
    • weremoose
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:29pm

      @objective
      By your logic, I could claim that my god demands my 14 year old child‘s life or even your child’s life and the state has no right to interfere because of “separation of church and state”.

      Because that is exactly what is happening. Selfishness has become a religion and mothers and doctors who have violated their oaths are sacrificing their children to it every day. Those children are protected under the Constitution, which is the highest law in the land, but their rights are routinely ignored. And you want to talk to me about matters of law. Our government does not practice the rule of law anymore.

      Report Post » weremoose  
    • weremoose
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:42pm

      A fetus has a unique gene signature and is a separate life apart from the mother. It is murder and can’t be defined by any other definition in a rational argument. Separate, unique human genes. Fetuses have even been proven to react in attempt to escape abortion devices and chemicals.

      Again. This is not a medical issue. When you kill an innocent, unique human life unless you are doing so to save another life it is murder. When you consent to such an act, when you have the power to resist it, you are also committing murder. There is no genetic distinction between a fetus and a baby.

      Oh, and to further prove your general ignorance, a Moose is actually quite graceful for its size and very intelligent. The Swedish cavalry attempted to train moose as war mounts, but this proved ineffective because moose refused to charge a pike line the way horses will.

      Report Post » weremoose  
    • inblack
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:59pm

      @WEREMOOSE

      I would proudly stand beside you to save a life.

      Report Post »  
    • weremoose
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 4:13pm

      @inblack
      Thanks brother (sister)

      We’ll turn this ship around.

      Report Post » weremoose  
    • objectivetruth
      Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:58pm

      @moose
      I’m not talking about a fetus.I’m talking about a zygote and a little beyond.At this stage the cells can’t survive even with assisted help.I’m glad to discover the real reason you are so pro life.Your wife was almost aborted.Most people who are so adamantly prolife have a personal reason.First trimester abortion isn’t legally murder.No matter what you may think.The law doesn‘t prosecute as there isn’t any crime.
      Put it to you another way.Women using birth control is married to very abusive man.Her birth control method fails.She knows that her other kids and herself are going to be put in serious jeopardy possibly killed if she has the child she is carrying.Should she have it and risk death and leave her other children without a mother?Whats your answer Mr Moral Absolutes?Btw adoption isn’t a qualified answer.I expect your answer.

      Report Post »  
  • ravendoe
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:46pm

    Although his actions were wrong his thinking is right, abortion is murder.

    Love says, ‘I sacrifice myself for the good of the other person.’ Abortion says, ‘I sacrifice the other person for the good of myself.’ 180Movie

    Report Post » ravendoe  
  • Captain Crunch
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:39pm

    “This incident appears to be the most extreme example of what is now a very concerning escalation of anti-abortion activity aimed at providers and women who need their services”

    Extreme? No what’s extreme is murdering babies. Finally the hackers are doing something right!

    Report Post »  
  • JBIII
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:37pm

    “This incident appears to be the most extreme example of what is now a very concerning escalation of anti-abortion activity aimed at providers and women who need their services.”

    What woman ever “NEEDS” to have an abortion? One could argue that if there are health risks to the woman it should be acceptable (which is rare in comparisons to other reasons women get them), but barring that the general “NEED” that they speak of involve an “inconvenience” to the women and their lives. And that justifies the killing of a being who is being hosted by another?

    A fetus isn’t just some random mass of cells, it is a growing human being that is being contained within the mother! It doesn’t mature into a tree or a fish, it grows into being a human being! Just because it can’t support itself at the time does not give the woman the right to murder it. By the same logic I suppose we should be allowed to kill newborns or the elderly or disabled who can’t support themselves?! This kind of logic is mind boggling and it’s incredible that it can even be rationalized.

    As far as Anonymous though, they‘re vigilante’s of the internet. The problem is that they‘re not super hero’s who have some superior moral understanding; they‘re just people and they don’t have the right to say who is more wrong or right than anyone else and punish those that they deem to be in the wrong.

    Report Post »  
    • MyzPhoenyx
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 6:38pm

      I do know a woman that had to have an abortion. She had three children, two of them young, already and had had a stroke. She got her second and third opinions, dying inside. She had to choose between her children, or die. If she chose the elder children, she would live. It still haunts hurts her, haunts her. But she chose to live for her children that had come along before. After that, she had her tubes cut and burned, so that there would never be a chance of having to make that choice again. So I do know that there are women out there that suffer the way that she does.
      But other than that situation, I can’t see ending the life of my child. It would tear my soul out. So I don’t know how others can do it as a form of birth control.
      I do not agree with this kind of privacy intrusive activity though. What was he hoping, that these women would be shamed in their communities, some just for seeking information? Do we really want to go down the lines of defending someone that has decided the he is the issuer of rights? But do we all want any kind of intrusion on our medical dealings? It‘s a slippery slope to say that it’s alright to invade the privacy of those that we don’t agree with. Because, wouldn‘t we then have to say that it’s alright for them to do the same thing to us?

      Report Post » MyzPhoenyx  
    • deeberj
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:23pm

      MyzPhoeniz – Your post is a bit unclear. Are you saying she got pregnant and had a stroke and would die if she had her baby?

      I did a lot of searching on the internet and could find nothing that says if a woman has a stroke while pregnant it’s good to have an abortion.

      Report Post » deeberj  
    • objectivetruth
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:23pm

      Well by your logic the mother is just hosting.Then the cancer patient is just hosting to.The sufferer of parasites are also just hosting,Lets with hold treatment.Afterall cancer is just a bunch of cells too.The parasites just need a warm colon.Its the same logic and you know it.Early tem abortion is about the same.Those blobs of cells can’t be saved even in nicu or a petree dish.However you now know why those who are proabortion in the first three months and may be prolife in the later trimesters will never support you.Your ridiculous assumption of how life is, how it should be and your absolute moral values, that forgot to take the human condition in to play ,render it impossible to support you in any way.The proabortionists and the prolifers are part of the same coin, just the flip side of it.Its called the nazi coin.They both end in genocide,mass suicide and untold human misery.
      The proabortionists way is quicker and much more honest.Y’alls way is deceitful and slow and wallows in misery.Disbelieve it look up Nicolae Ceaușescu http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolae_Ceau%C5%9Fescu
      1966 agreement and what happened in the aftermath.

      Report Post »  
  • Obama Nation
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:37pm

    Sheriff Joe on Obama Investigation: Worse Than Watergate; Biggest Media Blackout in History

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/03/sheriff-joe-on-obama-investigation.html

    Report Post »  
  • 13th Imam
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:36pm

    Anonymous is suing Anonymous for the use of the name Anonymous. Meanwhile Babies are slaughtered.

    Report Post » 13th Imam  
  • lukerw
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:34pm

    An interesting Diversion Tactic… to confuse the beholder… upon which side they are!

    Report Post » lukerw  
  • Eric_The_Red_State
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:30pm

    I don’t get it.

    Isn’t ANONYMOUS supposed to be a LIBERAL …….wanting LIBERAL things?
    Isn’t one of the LIBERAL wishes…………….. to be able to have ABORTIONS??

    So a Liberal is exposing Liberals for being Liberal?

    I am so confused.

    Report Post » Eric_The_Red_State  
    • Biddle
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:55pm

      and Republicans think they have Jesus in a box. but we know that His kingdom is NOT of this world so we need to stop acting like we dont know what that means!

      Report Post »  
    • DisarmoniaMundi
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:00pm

      Anon is completely decentralized; they have no platform. When something is done under the name of ‘Anon’, it’s generally a percentage of those who use that guise…the misconception is that they always act together as a collective.

      In other words, whenever someone is going to do something that relates to hacking, they’ll use the umbrella of Anon to make themselves seem larger than they actually are. They can attain a few like-minded individuals to go along, but it’s almost never the ENTIRE group..I have no idea how you’d ascertain the majority ideology of Anon, so we can‘t really say for sure they’re ‘liberal’ OR ‘conservative’.

      ANYONE can make use of ‘Anon’. Progressives OR Individualists.

      Report Post »  
    • Eric_The_Red_State
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:05pm

      WOLVERINES!!!

      z

      Report Post » Eric_The_Red_State  
  • MONICNE
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:26pm

    Hackers are criminals and public protesters are unwashed, unthinkable persons who resemble snorting pigs in the street with their signs and pumped up outrage.

    Report Post » MONICNE  
  • Locked
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:26pm

    Using an Anonymous picture doesn’t mean using their hashtag or backing. Odds are he‘s a hacker who did it on his own using Anonymous’s Name as protection/bragging rights.

    Either way, he obviously wasn’t smart enough to avoid being arrested. Have fun in jail!

    Report Post »  
  • Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:24pm

    Maybe they are just helping to abort their data?

    Report Post » Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra  
  • RJJinGadsden
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:24pm

    To me it’s suspicious that finally one of the “ANONYMOUS” hackers can only be exposed for attacking something on the left?! This is creepy and exposing.

    Report Post » RJJinGadsden  
  • Mark0331
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:22pm

    “Threatend to expose the names of these women…”…. what purpose does that serve? Sounds a little like the way a blackmail/extortion ring works…going after the spiritually weak and vulnerable….stay classy ‘anonymous’.

    Report Post » Mark0331  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:09pm

    While I am pro life across the board the fact remains that the Anonymous group is a band of thieves, anarchists and cyber terrorists who do need to be stopped.

    Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • deeberj
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:11pm

      I don’t care if a hacker brings down the info system of an abortion clinic.

      Report Post » deeberj  
    • boxy
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:16pm

      agreed. It’s kinda weird that they would get behind a cause that is not on the progressive agenda. But he is an “alleged” member so meh.

      Report Post »  
1 2

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love