Government

American Bar Association: Significant Number of Obama Judicial Nominees ‘Not Qualified’

ABA Declares Significant Number of Obama Judicial Nominees Not Qualified,

The American Bar Association, the largest law and voluntary professional association in the world, has declared a number of President Obama’s potential judicial nominees “not qualified.” The New York Times reports that the rejection rate for Obama’s judicial suggestions “is more than three and a half times as high as it was under either of the previous two presidencies,“ and called the number ”significant:”

“The association’s judicial vetting committee has opposed 14 of the roughly 185 potential nominees the administration asked it to evaluate, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The number of Obama prospects deemed ‘not qualified’ already exceeds the total number opposed by the group during the eight-year administrations of Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush; the rejection rate is more than three and a half times as high as it was under either of the previous two presidencies, documents and interviews show.”

The ABA provides law school accreditation, continuing legal education, information about the law, programs to assist lawyers and judges in their work, and initiatives to improve the legal system for the public. The 15-person judicial vetting committee is appointed by the bar association’s president, who serves for one year, to fill staggered three-year terms. The Committee Chairman Allan Joseph told the Times that the panel is fair-minded, and puts in long hours reading candidates’ writings and conducting confidential interviews about them with dozens of judges and lawyers.

“Our role is to provide the only peer review in the whole process, and we think that is valuable — particularly with a lifetime appointment under consideration,” he said. The committee does not disclose identities or its ratings of judicial prospects unless the president goes on to nominate them

The unfavorable vetting of Obama’s suggestions throws a wrench into the politics of judicial nominations, as the Times notes that in recent Republican administrations conservatives have accused the ABA of liberal bias. In 2001, President Bush stopped sending the ABA names of prospects prior to their nomination, a practice that President Obama may regret restoring. The White House indicated that it will not nominate any person that the ABA deemed unqualified.

The Times notes that the administration is still perplexed with their low batting average by comparison when it comes to finding judges the ABA likes, and the Times reports that the administration has criticized the organization for placing too much value on courtroom experience when rating possible nominees. Many of the failed Obama suggestions are government lawyers and law professors.

But are qualified candidates being sacrificed for diversity? The New York Times includes these two curious paragraphs in its piece:

Mr. Obama has made it a policy goal to diversify the bench in terms of race, gender and life experiences. Many of his other female and minority prospects received favorable bar group ratings and went on to be nominated and confirmed; the judges he has appointed have been more likely to be women or minorities than those of any previous president.

[...]

Still, the demographic composition of the 14 prospects opposed by the panel has proved to be awkward. A person familiar with the ratings said nine are women — five of whom are white, two black, and two Hispanic. Of the five men, one is white, two are black, and two are Hispanic.

“Although we may not agree with all of their ratings,” Obama’s White House counsel, Kathryn Ruemmler, said in a statement regarding the Times story, “we respect and value their historical role in evaluating judicial candidates. The president remains committed to addressing the judicial vacancy crisis with urgency and with qualified candidates who bring a diverse range of experience to the bench.”

Comments (141)

  • Secessionista
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:23pm

    One of the dirty little secrets of federal government workers is that they actively enforce racism in their daily work. Judges rule against whites and for blacks. A white man at the welfare office barely stands a chance, even in a wheelchair. But any black can walk in and get all the free stuff with a wink and a nod.

    I have a black friend and she explicitly says this is what’s happening and she knows lots of black friends in the government doing the very same thing.

    It’s funny, they of all people should know that racism is evil, but the moment they get even the tiniest bit of power, they go nuts, and become more rabid than any KKK member.

    Obama doesn’t care about the qualifications of these black, latino, and women judges, all he cares about is that their track records already show that they will rule for the minorities and women predominantly.

    Report Post » Secessionista  
    • PASSIONFORCHRIST
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 4:05pm

      You are so right!!!!!!!!!!

      Report Post »  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 4:08pm

      The progressives ( Socialist/Communist minions of the Global Banking cartel ) got the stronghold on America in 1933, when the receivers of the 1933 bankruptcy took over America. Under the doctrine of Parens Patriae, “Government As Parent”, as a result of the manipulated bankruptcy of the United States of America in 1930, ALL the assets of the American people, their person, and of our country itself are held by the Depository Trust Corporation at 55 Water Street, NY, NY, secured by UCC Commercial Liens, which are then monetized as “debt money” by the Federal Reserve. It may interest you to know that under the umbrella of the Depository Trust Corporation lies the CEDE Corporation, the Federal Reserve Corporation, the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, the legal arm of the banking interests, and the Internal Revenue Service, the system’s collection agency.

      The Independent Treasury Act of 1920 suspended the de jure Treasury Department of the United States government. Our Congress turned the treasury department over to a private corporation, which when seen in its true light, is a fascist monopolistic cartel, the Federal Reserve and their agents. The bulk of the ownership of the Federal Reserve System, a very well kept secret from the American Citizen, is held by these banking interests, and NONE is held by the United States Treasury:

      The only way to be free again, is to print American currency based on a silver standand.

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • robert
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 4:12pm

      A caller on Rush Limbaugh yesterday said Obama’s entire career has been occupied with pro-black advancement to the exclusion of everything else. He added that Obama wanted to be president in order to continue that policy and that is why he seems detached from everything that comes up, as Tom Brokaw observed, “He seems to have a detached indifference about him.”

      Rush said he thought he was right, but that such a policy favoring blacks and non-whites has been going on for quite a long time now, and it has resulted in a less than prosperous black community, as indicated by stats revealing AA for blacks has caused the population to become less powerful and prosperous as a group.

      While, as a group, liberal, pro-black, non-white policies might well be undermining non-white (especially black) populations, much harm is being done by this community organizer.

      First of all, he is putting in place a LOT of people who are anti-white and they are Obama’s arms to his anti-white policy, not just Obama himself. Mark Lloyd, for example, is changing the scene of many local news stations by threatening the networks with heavy government action if they do not hire unqualified blacks for their news teams. The FCC has much power to pressure small stations. “FCC’s Diversity Czar: ‘White People’ Need to be Forced to ‘Step Down’ ‘So Someone Else Can Have Power’

      I have no doubt every one of Obama‘s appt’s will be pro-black, anti-white. Post racial? Hardly.

      Report Post »  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 4:13pm

      It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has
      been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1,
      Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and
      insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 – Joint
      Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause
      dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official
      capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and
      Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal
      Government exists today in name only.

      The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International
      Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International
      Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now
      operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers.
      With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the
      receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the
      United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an
      established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This
      act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office
      of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International
      Monetary Fund.

      This is the Crime of the century. A huge ponzi-Scheme to enslave the American people.

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • certified ethical hacker
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:49pm

      :”he president remains committed to addressing the judicial vacancy crisis with urgency and with qualified candidates who bring a diverse range of experience to the bench.” Does this mean he needs more gang bangers and thugs? I have said many times almost any black person will take care of other blacks at any cost, and this means giving them entitlements weather they deserve it or not. I have witnessed blacks come in to the veterans clinic and many of them will not talk to a white person esp if they know they do not qualify. and some of the blacks here bend over backward to help their own kind but treat white people like they are a burden. the blacks have no patents with whites but are very tolerant with with their own . Like I have said many times, this is not a good country to be white in. Everything is geared to ensure minorities have the advantage.

      Report Post »  
    • Hobbs57
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 7:02pm

      Your right problemsolver, we have been r.a.p.e.d as a nation. Now they just fleece our only remaining wealth when it become valued enough, our land. This is the same thing they did back in the late 1870′s and again during the great depression, and now, once again with the housing crisis. It was homesteads and the established frontier lands the banks had stole off the people back in the past. It is only a housing crisis this round because the land is occupied by houses. Our worth as a Nation is only determined by the value of the land they own, the resources there in, and also the level of security one can feel while occupying their land. In other words, they won’t have it taken back off of them by unfair practices.
      Did the Kennedy not enact that silver could be used to back money ?? This is a true standing order, is it not ? Don’t you believe this is why he was killed ? I do , I feel it was the bone he threw to the people. He knew it would be his end.

      Report Post » Hobbs57  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 1:50am

      @Hobbs
      I Absolutely believe JFK was bumped for signing Executive order #11110, Authorizing the U.S.Treasury to print silver certificates again in 5 dollar denominations.
      This would devalue the federal reserve note, which is based only on speculators, manipulating it how they saw fit.
      We must reinstate #11110 and quit the UN, Print American currency based on Silver.
      The elite love their gold. Using silver and considering gold worthless would free us from them, or manipulate them into trading their gold in for silver.
      Then we could find another innovative substitute to absolutely destroy them.

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • robert
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 9:48am

      “It’s funny, they of all people should know that racism is evil, but the moment they get even the tiniest bit of power, they go nuts, and become more rabid than any KKK member. ”

      I’ve witnessed what you write of so many times it has turned me highly critical of blacks in general. Of course, black high crime rates, and an inability to learn and succeed, blaming whites and their ancestors for it, has added to my resentment. But it is these constant lies told by blacks and white liberals, blaming whites, that probably was the last straw, because I know full well, as most people do, that black failure today is the direct result of black inability, and positively, absolutely nothing else. Period.

      That’s why I began speaking out against black charges. And I noticed from other sites that literally thousands of other people are doing the same, including non-black minorities who have had enough as well. It looks like the tide is beginning to change, and I‘m pretty sure it’s due to internet news and videos starkly revealing black crimes we’ve never been privvy to before. Up till a few short years ago, all our news was from the MSM that edited out racial news they felt we shouldn’t see.

      Too I have to give the community organizer credit and the racist blacks associated with him for lifting the edge of another curtain that was unknown to most, revealing abject anti-white hate from the likes of Jeremiah Wright and others.

      Report Post »  
    • whodunit
      Posted on November 26, 2011 at 12:05am

      I think the USPS has that problem. The carriers work hard, no matter what color they are. Look around the offices for the problem. If you do not handle mail everyday, you may not be needed.

      Report Post »  
  • bringiton
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:20pm

    High ratings from the ABA. LMAO! And the Nobel prize committee was really, really impressed with the turd in a punch bowl too. That’s like Michael Savage liking the way I think. Bernbart, you are…..Na. Forget it. Not worth my time.

    Report Post »  
    • AJAYW
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:47pm

      @ bringiton
      Did they get those ratings by meeting the qualification criteria of laying on their backs, left wing radical activists or because they they are Marxists? Just a question ! We all know that obama is a Marxists. He may even try to get that fat wife of his appointed, heck they might be working on her papers right now. We all know how that can be done.

      rule

      Report Post »  
    • Detroit paperboy
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 4:41pm

      The fact that Obamas not qualified to be president is the real point here….

      Report Post »  
    • Lamarr01
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 12:56am

      The ABA evaluates the ethics and moral character of each lawyer. Any lawyer that has any ethics or morals is automatically rejected.

      Report Post » Lamarr01  
  • bernbart
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:16pm

    drattastic: Wrong Actually the ABA is full of conservative lawyers.

    Report Post »  
    • old white guy
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:19pm

      how about all b hussiens nominees are less than qualified much like his emmenicence.

      Report Post »  
    • Lamarr01
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 12:58am

      When you mention “conservative lawyers”, there should be a punchline.

      Report Post » Lamarr01  
  • bernbart
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:13pm

    So the right think activism is okay when they want to appoint right wing judges to overthrow Roe, but consider it wrong to have are balanced views and to appoint judges who will protect our basic liberties.
    It used to be presidents, up until Bush Jr. did not use a political measure for picking judges. Obama dose not use political measures for picking judges either. However it but it is a good idea to attempt to bring more diversity to the courts that represents the United States population today, as old white men are the minority.

    Report Post »  
    • DSTSS2010
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:30pm

      NOTHING Obama does is NOT politically motivated.

      Report Post » DSTSS2010  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:41pm

      Really BERNBART? So when the supreme court has gone against Sonia Sotomayor’s decisions 65% of the time in the past, yet she still makes into the supreme court we‘re to think it’s on merit or because it was a political appointment by Obama? Please don‘t insult anyone by suggesting its’ the former.

      Report Post »  
    • 762x51
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:52pm

      BurnedFart – The objective in appointing judges is NOT to bring diversity to the court. It is to appoint judges who will follow the law and apply it equally amoung the population. Diversity has NO place in courts. By definition, your diversity BS in court establishes different standards for different groups which is unconstitutional. It is however, consistent with liberal racism and your tendencies to segregate groups in order to create victimhood and misery you can exploit for political gain to satisify your evil lust for power.

      Report Post »  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:55pm

      I am afraid that I will not trust a President who thinks the Constitution is full of negative liberties.

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • AJAYW
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 4:01pm

      @ bernbart

      Yes, white men might be the minority. They are also the only men that take responsiaibility for and support the kids they make. The other races breed like rabbits and lets the taxpayers support their off springs.

      Report Post »  
    • robert
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 9:59am

      “American Bar Association: Significant Number of Obama Judicial Nominees ‘Not Qualified’

      They’re not only unqualified most every single one of them holds an anti-white bias, with some so full of hate they are totally unable to render any kind of decision that is even close to objective. I haven’t found that to be true of MOST conservative judges.

      Anybody who thinks that Ginsberg, Sotomayor, and Kagen are qualified to be on the SCOTUS should take a closer look at what they have done and said and their backgrounds which reveal a pampered sect of people who are divorced from the realities of life. Also, their addition to the court gives it the appearance of a ghastly side show.

      However, the dominos are now beginning to fall, and it won’t be much longer before the only thing that is important throughout the West is who has the most firepower and manpower, because the entire scene is set to ignite into hostilities that will make the Arab Spring seem like an Arab picnic.

      Report Post »  
  • bernbart
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:55pm

    Kagan got a VERY high rating from the ABA, Thomas got a C-

    Report Post »  
    • djt1948
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 10:04pm

      @Bern bart: these morons don’t want facts.

      Report Post » djt1948  
    • Lucy Larue
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:59pm

      BERNBART,
      That is because we are a nation in Wonderland.
      Of course a good,good,man like Justice Thomas would get a lower rating than Kegan and Sotomayor! Of course he would!
      Clarence Thomas is a man of true intellect. Clarence Thomas reveres his nation.
      In Wonderland these are negatives!
      Elena Kegan and Sonia Sotomayor really only have a sense of themselves. They are PROGRESSIVES.
      In Wonderland these are attributes of the first order!
      Happy Thanksgiving Bernbart. Enjoy your HALAL Butterball. Are you having HALAL goat as part of your feast too?
      Get your learn on Bernbart. Read Justice Thomas’s memoir, “My Grandfather’s Son”.
      You won’t. You should.

      A THANKSGIVING post from Wonderland. Down is up. Up is down. We’re painting the roses red.
      As the Cheshire Cat says,”We’re ALL mad here”.

      Report Post »  
  • NHwinter
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:54pm

    This is not a surprise. Obama isn’t qualified either. Weren’t Obama and Michelle prohibited from practicing law in Chicago?

    Report Post » NHwinter  
    • Mojoron
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:06pm

      I think they did not renew their licenses–for what ever reason!!! Those sort of details are missing, of course–like everything else in the past history of those two.

      Report Post » Mojoron  
    • RichNGadsden
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:28pm

      MOJORON, 0bama surrendered his law license to avoid a criminal investigation, and the FLOTUS was forced to surrender her license. They are literally two peas in a pod.

      Report Post » RichNGadsden  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:38pm

      Obama doesn‘t care if they’re not qualified…just look at that bumbling idiot Eric Holder. His entire career has been a litany of failure. Obama only cares about what political gains he can make by his legal appointments. This is why Sotomayor and Kagan are in place now. Sotomayor has seen the Supreme court go 65% against her decisions. A terrible number..yet Obama appointed her. Then you’ve got Kagan actively involved in and cheering on Obamacare…while now in the position of determining it’s constitutionality.

      Report Post »  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:43pm

      RICHNGADSDEN…don’t forget…Michelle Antoinette is the one who got that patient dumping scheme in Chicago going.

      Report Post »  
    • h20sue
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:35pm

      You are soooooo right!
      The problem with Washington is: TOO MANY ATTORNEY’S.

      They (and I mean Michelle and Barrack) know just how far they can go because they know the law…
      This also applies to others who have law degrees and serve in our Senate and Congress.

      I also think we have too many “back scratchers”. They seem to pass laws they have no business passing, because they are scratching each others back, or what most call “wheeling and dealing”.
      Pork spending has got to stop…. Too much money being spent on Welfare.

      I live in Virginia and I hear women bragging about not working because they get free baby sitting, free food, free this, and free that. They have two or three children in tow, and they are receiving approximately $1500.00 per child thanks to taxpayers like you and myself. One woman was bragging about just having her manicure, pedicure, and hair extensions, completed at the Walmart across the street, while paying for three carts of junk food with her WIC card. There was no milk, flour, sugar, bread, greens, veggies, fruits, etc., just premade meals, cola’s, chips, dips, etc. in those carts. I’m sorry, but I find this extremely wrong.
      As she left the store I followed behind with my cart and witnessed her getting into a brand new Escalade with 30 days tags,driving away. I just looked up at the heavens and asked why? Could it be because ‘our government’ isn’t doing their job? I reckon!
      It’s totally disgusting and our law makers are a

      Report Post »  
    • Dicker
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 3:09am

      Obumma & Mooochele surrendered their law licences before they could be disbarred. How come the great news media never followed up on the reasons and facts behind this? Just another example of how Obumma conned America . The press and the media were complicit in preventing the people from finding out anything about Obumma’s past. They were co-conspirators in the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.

      Report Post »  
  • mrmikejohnson
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:52pm

    Liberals prefer to judge people by the color of their skin. Conservatives prefer to judge people by the content of their character. Liberals don’t think the person who is best qualified for a job should get that job (unless it’s the NFL or the NBA).

    It’s bad when presidents do this stuff on lower levels. It’s even worse that Obama nominated Kagan and Sotormayor for the Supreme Court. It’s a pretty sad day in America when someone is excluded from a job search because of the color of their skin and their sex; like white men being excluded from the Supreme Court nomination process. One bookmaker gave 90-1 odds that Obama would select a white male as his first Supreme Court nominee. That’s just sad.

    Report Post »  
    • bernbart
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:59pm

      Of course both Kagan and Sotomayor got very high ratings.

       
    • biohazard23
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:26pm

      Kagan? Is that who’s in the picture? I thought it was Fred Flintstone.

      Report Post » biohazard23  
    • Therightsofbilly
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 7:55pm

      I thought it was Lou Costello

      Report Post » Therightsofbilly  
    • djt1948
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 10:02pm

      You idiot! You apparently are unaware of the fact that women and minorities have been “overlooked” for most of the history of this country when it comes to top-level appointments such as the courts. Women are half of our population and there are more college-educated women than men in America. Why on earth wouldn’t a President try to reflect half of the population when making appointments?

      Report Post » djt1948  
  • 1casawizard
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:52pm

    this does not surprise me. Tell me something I don’t know, Blaze.

    Report Post » 1casawizard  
  • PATRIOTGRUNT
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:51pm

    Slumming for stories are we. Now go and find something we didn’t already know.

    Report Post » PATRIOTGRUNT  
  • 1casawizard
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:42pm

    Same ****, Different day.

    Report Post » 1casawizard  
  • Alucard
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:40pm

    We already knew this. Who needs qualifications when you are an activist?

    Report Post »  
    • bernbart
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:54pm

      Bush quit using the ABA for his appointees to get his unqualified people in. Not sure why Blaze is showing Kagen at the too of this story as Kagan got a VERY HIGH rating from the ABA, while Thomas got a C- rating.

       
    • bernbart
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:57pm

      YOu comment would of course apply to Clarence Thomas more than any justice, and he got a
      C- rating. Kagan however got a very high rating A+ from the ABA.

      Report Post »  
    • Welcome Black Carter
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:35pm

      ” he got a
      C- rating. Kagan however got a very high rating A+ from the ABA”

      Isaiah 5:20 (NIV84)
      20 Woe to those who call evil good
      and good evil,
      who put darkness for light
      and light for darkness,
      who put bitter for sweet
      and sweet for bitter.

      Report Post » Welcome Black Carter  
    • RichNGadsden
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:42pm

      BERNBART, bit of a broken record today, aren’t you? BTW, did you ever make a “C” grade on anything? Pretty well happened to all of us here. Nobody is perfect all of the time. I still believe Kagen and Sotomayor will simply follow the liberal slant in their decisions for the most part. They are there to serve a master just the same when FDR loaded the court. Yep, I know. The same thing would happen if the conservatives could do load the court too.

      Report Post » RichNGadsden  
    • Mimi24
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 11:48pm

      Damn Bernbart. Are you a parrot? How many times are you going to repeat that? We may not agree with you but we can read.

      Report Post »  
  • Anonymous T. Irrelevant
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:38pm

    “The White House indicated that it will not nominate any person that the ABA deemed unqualified.”
    ——————————————————————————
    Another promise unlikely to be kept.

    Report Post » Anonymous T. Irrelevant  
  • Hickory
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:38pm

    Obama’s requirements boil down to one: Marxists.

    Report Post » Hickory  
  • Anonymous T. Irrelevant
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:37pm

    Obama, included.
    Why now? Why didn’t they come out with that before Sotomayer? We could have saved ourselves a couple of socialist SCOTUS’s.

    Report Post » Anonymous T. Irrelevant  
    • bernbart
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:01pm

      Both Kagan and Sotomoyor got a very high rating from the ABA.

      Report Post »  
    • drattastic
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:12pm

      I’m going to go out on a limb here and assume that the ABA is full of ACLU and trial lawyer ambulance chasers . So after making that assumption who cares how highly they rank one of their own kind. Bottom line is a bunch of lawyers is as about impressive to me as den of snakes, dangerous but utterly revolting.

      Report Post » drattastic  
    • drattastic
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:14pm

      That comment was directed @bernbart

      Report Post » drattastic  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:23pm

      Bernbart Both Kagan and Sotomayor are left wing radical activists,and shouldn‘t even be on the court and they’ll contort the constitution to fit their progressive agenda.

      Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • EchoHawk
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 4:03pm

      And that differs how from the nominations/appointments of Alito and Roberts?

      Report Post »  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:15pm

      Echohawk Alito and Roberts are strict constructionists,they’ll adhere to the constitution and not add their personal beliefs to their rulings.

      Report Post » progressiveslayer  
  • AmericanStrega
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:32pm

    One thing that really slays me about Obama’s two justices is this: Mr. Obama’s wife, along with Bloomberg, et;al are trying to tell us what we can and cannot eat, because “America is obese.” Well, these two women are not on the svelt side. These politicians, politicians wives, and judges all want to dictate to us, the tax paying American People, what is good for us. Well, I say to them; PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH! Socialism is for the people NOT the socialist!
    Thank You and PIG OUT FOR THANKSGIVING AMERICA! Also, please give to whatever non-governmental charity you can afford too. Like your local church so they can feed the poorer of us unwashed masses. Happy Thanksgiving all. May God Bless us all and have mercy on our souls.

    Report Post »  
    • Mimi24
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 11:44pm

      Happy Thanksgiving to you as well. God bless .

      Report Post »  
  • MrMagoo
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:32pm

    “The White House indicated that it will not nominate any person that the ABA deemed unqualified.”

    Yeah,right.

    Report Post » MrMagoo  
    • smithclar3nc3
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:41pm

      Judges should be voted in by the people and not an ideological President.

      Report Post »  
  • moreteaplease
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:29pm

    Boy are these folks late to the party or what? I‘m sure if they look close enough they will see that their qualification criteria and Obama’s are probably a wee bit different.

    Report Post » moreteaplease  
  • Stoic one
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:27pm

    He appears to believe that any of his buddies can do as he has done, disable the country.

    Report Post » Stoic one  
  • LeadNotFollow
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:19pm

    This is not news. We knew this all along. Obama’s whole administration is unqualified, including the POTUS. Obama has a very evil grin. It’s as if Satan and the Grinch had a child together. Creepy.

    Report Post »  
  • jakartaman
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:18pm

    OH – thats OK – as long as they are pro criminal – welfare -illegal immigrants – socialist and do not like America especially the capitalist economy and those nasty military people

    Report Post »  
  • progressiveslayer
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:16pm

    So they fit right in with Barry.

    Report Post » progressiveslayer  
  • SpartanPride
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:15pm

    You mean the DeVry Law Shool degrees don’t make good judges? Not surprising, but very troubling. Just more anecdotal evidence that BO is a major buffoon himself.

    Report Post » SpartanPride  
    • RichNGadsden
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:12pm

      Are you kidding, those would probably be more sensible, down to earth than any of the crap coming out of the Harvard Law School, Yale, Rice or any of the other more uppity universities.

      Report Post » RichNGadsden  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:14pm

    Understand to Mr Obama there is only one qualification needed — slavish and radical adherance to the overthrow of the nation.

    Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • bernbart
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:05pm

      It was the right who is using political activism as a measure for appointment to the on the courts.

      Report Post »  
    • RichNGadsden
      Posted on November 23, 2011 at 3:46pm

      BERNBART, After learning FDR’s trick, it’s now both sides doing this. You are definitely the kettle calling the pot black.

      Report Post » RichNGadsden  
  • JLGunner
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:11pm

    No kidding, haven’t we been saying this all along?!?!?!?!

    Report Post » JLGunner  
  • lukerw
    Posted on November 23, 2011 at 2:10pm

    Christ… OBAMA is NOT QUALIFIED!

    Report Post » lukerw  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In