Faith

‘An Agenda For All Humanity’: Labour Candidate for London Mayor Sees Islam as Blueprint

If a politician said he wanted to “cement our city as a beacon that demonstrates the meaning of the words of the Prophet,” one might assume that politician came from Syria, Iran or maybe even one of Egypt’s more radical Muslim factions. But they’d be wrong. That person is, in fact, the Labour Party’s candidate for London Mayor, Ken Livingstone.

The Daily Telegraph found the above video of Livingstone’s speech, and wrote this about it:

Mr Livingstone, Labour’s candidate for mayor of London, pledged to “educate the mass of Londoners” in Islam, saying:  “That will help to cement our city as a beacon that demonstrates the meaning of the words of the Prophet.” Mr Livingstone described Mohammed’s words in his last sermon as “an agenda for all humanity.”

He praised the Prophet’s last sermon, telling his audience: “I want to spend the next four years making sure that every non-Muslim in London knows and understands [its] words and message.” He also promised to “make your life a bit easier financially.”

Mr Livingstone was speaking at last Friday’s Jummah prayer at the North London Central Mosque, also known as Finsbury Park Mosque, formerly controlled by the terrorist recruiter Abu Hamza.

The Mosque in question:

Labour Candidate for London Mayor Speaks in Favor of Islamic Theocracy at Mosque Linked to Zacarias Moussaoui

The mosque has a number of other “celebrity” attendees – such as Zacarias Moussaoui.

Comments (96)

1 2
  • getourcountryback
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:56pm

    Hey buddy, you go right ahead and read the words and pray to the sand camel god if you want but leave me the heck out of it. How dare you or anybody else try to dictate my religion. Oh, wait a minute, your in England. That is what the British have done for centuries. Never mind………

    Report Post »  
    • TomFerrari
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 9:31pm

      Wow. Some blueprint. Funny, though, it is the exact same blueprint Adolph Hitler used:
      Kill all the Jews, kill the gays, and kill all who dare speak in opposition. Though islam goes even further, chopping hands off thieves, and demeaning women / misogyny even more obviously than did Hitler. At least nazi Germany accepted women as human, unless they were Jews or lesbians or rebels.

      Report Post » TomFerrari  
    • dmerwin
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 9:35pm

      Committing suicide both literally and politically.

      Report Post » dmerwin  
    • db321
      Posted on March 20, 2012 at 2:42am

      Londoners – Sharia it’s coming – Enjoy – don’t ask America to bail you out – welcome to the next stage of Liberalize – your County will exist but your people will be know as the living dead – Don’t walk – Run to the Polls and vote in your destruction and do it with a happy face.

      America is going through the same right now – the Marxist running our Country have not come out of the Closet, as of yet, as yours has – the only difference is that Americans are armed and many like me or willing to die to keep America free.

      I wonder how the Muslim Extremest will handle your Royalty – my guess is they are going to do away with them and tell you they are going to spread the Royal wealth.

      Report Post » db321  
    • jcldwl
      Posted on March 20, 2012 at 6:06am

      It’s all biblical. There is no stopping it. England is the lion and America is the eagles wings that are currently being clipped. Read the book of Daniel.

      Report Post » jcldwl  
    • nzkiwi
      Posted on March 20, 2012 at 7:18am

      He is not known as “Red Ken” for nothing.

      Report Post »  
    • stormcrow53
      Posted on March 20, 2012 at 7:52am

      @dmerwin: (1) He’s pandering to the crowd where he is preaching (a mosque) for votes. (2) If I am not mistaken I believe in London moHAMmed is the most popular boys name for newborn males. (3) I believe he is an avowed communist. Darn, that conspiracy freak Beck is right again. Europe is about done.
      I am telling you that people who believe we can coexist with Islam are fools, useful idiots or the enemy. For our children‘s and grandchildren’s sake:
      Islam must be destroyed.

      Report Post » stormcrow53  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on March 20, 2012 at 10:53am

      Seriously…how much of this stuff can the English take?

      Report Post »  
  • 003Cyrus
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:50pm

    Those in power are just using Islam to fulfill their needs, which is to bring about chaos. Once they dont need chaos any more, they will get rid of Islam…On a more meaningful note, even if none of you understand it, Islam is doing exactly what it was meant to do. You see the whole reason why the Creator spared Ishmael was because He knew Israel would try to restore the Great Kingdom before the rightful heir to the throne arrived. So He chose Ishmael‘s descendants to be a thorn in Israel’s side, so that they could not succeed. But listen; Once the rightful heir to the throne arrives Ishmael’s purpose will be fulfilled and Islam shall die….And the one that Israel is waiting on and the one that is about to come on the scene is not Jesus or the Antichrist. But the one who is named the Branch. The one who is going to prepare the way. Remember that name.

    Report Post »  
    • db321
      Posted on March 20, 2012 at 2:31am

      003 – You are so right! Once Power is achieved the Islamic Useful Idiots will be exterminated. it is simply an ends to a mean. It will be nice to see the Liberals, Gays, and Feminist destroy each other in the process.

      Report Post » db321  
  • abbygirl1994
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:46pm

    Britians seem to have just gave into whatever comes forth.. we can’t let that happen to us.. Wake up America, we are not to far behind the UK… Insanity.. Vote for anyone but Obama! Lord help us all

    Report Post » abbygirl1994  
    • SacredHonor1776
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 9:12pm

      If it saves your neck? Do what the Arabs do…

      Pantywaist…

      Report Post »  
    • UnreconstructedLibertarian
      Posted on March 20, 2012 at 1:25am

      You do know that it was Britain who harbored the exiled Karl Marx after his failed socialist revolution of 1848-49 in Germany. He lived out the rest of his life in London, where the first Communist party was allowed to exist (International Working Men’s Association) after the many failed socialist revolts all over Europe between 1848-51. By the way, these were actual militaristic revolutions, bloodshed and all.

      Nobody is going to say alot about these Marxist revolutions, because most of the exiles involved came here to escape and became the nucleus of Lincoln’s Republican party. Men like Carl Shurz, Franz Sigel, and August Willich.

      Report Post » UnreconstructedLibertarian  
    • academica2020
      Posted on March 20, 2012 at 6:31pm

      @UNRENCONSTRUCTED:
      Became part of “Lincoln’s Republican Party?”
      You are out of your mind.
      Interesting. There is a concerted effort to deconstruct Lincoln.
      You are one of many who have posted here on The Blaze in the past few months who have pilloried Lincoln and the formation of the Republican Party in the 1850s. You are all wrong and you get your information from dubious sources.
      Keep on going though. You will all become a caricature of all the folks who want to rewrite American history.

      Report Post » academica2020  
    • academica2020
      Posted on March 20, 2012 at 6:57pm

      @UNRECONSTRUCTED:
      BTW: You are full of crap, so name your sources. None of the historical information about the formation of the Republican Party notes your Marxist links. You bank on folks here being useless idiots. Try again…

      Report Post » academica2020  
    • UnreconstructedLibertarian
      Posted on March 21, 2012 at 1:17pm

      academica2020

      You are the one who has been duped. Name your sources in support of your stance. Are you going to side with the opinions of Stampp, Foner, or McPherson? Have you actually had a look at their political backrounds? Please cite me one of your own sources of viewpoint and lets see if it passes the 1960-something sniff test of where real revision began.

      My sources are the writings and associations of Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels themselves. Readily reviewable at marxists . org . I’m so moderated by “The Blaze” on this subject that primary source online links to actual conversations between Marx and the early Republican leaders are not allowed. You cannot post anything from marxists . org and it show up on the Blaze – instantly moderated.

      So, if you are brave enough – take the few names I’ve used in this thread and march on over to marxist . org and run them through the search engines. Moreover, keep doing that with early 1850′s Republicans. It doesn’t get more primary than the warm conversations of Marx and Engels with their US cohorts of the time.

      If you’d like – I’ll give you a whole list of early Communist Republicans – so you can do your own research on the matter and pick through the merit of the sources you find. My guess is the only early Republican name you know is Lincoln. Not Fremont, Shurz, Sigel, Willich or the myriad of both imported Socialist revolutionaries and home-grown socialist utopians.

      Report Post » UnreconstructedLibertarian  
    • academica2020
      Posted on March 21, 2012 at 3:26pm

      Nice try.
      As a Conservative and a Republican, a “Foundation Republican,” I find your information dubious, as do you mine. So, you are calling out historians (who are not Progressives) and saying that they have hidden the truth?
      Let’s review the foundations of the Republican Party, born of the Whigs, Know-Nothings, Northern Democrats, and Free Soil Party.
      Regardless, the driving forces were Seward (an abolitionist), and Chase (an abolitionist). Lincoln came later. Fremont was a war hero and the poster boy necessary to gain popularity.
      Just because the gentlemen you name came here and joined the party does not mean what you infer. There was a huge Nativist contingent as well, and they were and are nothing to be proud of. They were all the “joiners” who saw opportunity in a new party.
      Maybe you should read William Gienapp?
      I am a historian, so if you want to challenge me on this stuff, I can go 20 deep and provide primary source information, not just books written. I am tired of the anti-Lincoln spin. I was taken to task last week by some folks who think the Civil War was about Northern aggression. Nice! Keep swinging away. You all contribute to the denigration of our Nation.

      Report Post » academica2020  
    • academica2020
      Posted on March 21, 2012 at 3:36pm

      BTW: If you are going to quote websites as sources, don’t waste my time. Get in you car and drive to libraries and historical societies. Do primary research for authors who write about what you claim to know so much about.
      I have done both, and continue to do so. I have no agenda beyond stating historical fact.
      You are among a growing group of individuals who want to tear down the historical narrative of our nation. It started in the 1930s and continues to this day. You may be coming at this from a different angle than what is being spoon fed in schools and the media, but your agenda is just as flawed and misleading.

      Report Post » academica2020  
    • academica2020
      Posted on March 21, 2012 at 4:07pm

      Name your sources and I will name mine. Fair is fair.

      Report Post » academica2020  
    • UnreconstructedLibertarian
      Posted on March 28, 2012 at 4:38pm

      Acedemica2020,

      Any source that doesn’t agree with your own spin, you are going to dub as “dubious”.

      I stated my source, The Marx/Engels Collected Works. All primary works by the author’s own hands. I then looked up the biographies of every alleged “American” Marx and/or Engels was corresponding with. Bingo, Radical Republican founders – the most incriminating are the ones I’ve mentioned earlier. Others would include Charles A. Dana and Horace Greely.

      It just so happens its verifiable by online sources, so readers here can also see the same material quickly and judge the validity themselves. Who knows Marxists better than actual Marxists? You danced around the names I gave as blatant examples. Any cursory research on Fremont is going to reveal him as a flaming socialist. Seward and Stanton themselves are verifiably adherents and supporters of “Brook Farm” by about any period source out there to find.

      So, you are an academic historian? Well then, we know your real motivations, don’t we? I’m actually a lowly chicken farmer who once believed the same crap you are spouting because gov dependent idiots like you spoon fed it to me in college. You are the problem, and your whole machine of self-serving disinformation. You intimidate by status, but yet won’t divulge you own sources “20 deep”?

      If your information is that concrete – why not give me your sources for my own “edification”.

      Are you honestly going to defend Whigs and FreeSoilers

      Report Post » UnreconstructedLibertarian  
    • UnreconstructedLibertarian
      Posted on March 28, 2012 at 5:44pm

      Acedemica 2020,

      You have to be kidding me? You spout of primary sources then advise Gianappe? He has no literary basis beyond 1989, and its in alignment with the idealogies of Eric Foner?

      Who in the hell do you think you are? You are another alleged acedemic lightweight who is placing yourself in the merits of a Phony Lincoln narrative purely because it pushes your own agenda of government largesse! I’m sick of idiots like you, you have no stake in the facts – only the perpetuation of continual government growth. You may feign yourself conservative, but you are not.

      You explain to me how the hell Gianappe has more crediblity than DiLorenzo?

      You and your kind are creating associations between Abraham Lincoln and the modern Republicans that NEVER existed prior to the 1980′s. Dwight Eisenhower himself kept a portrait of Robert E. Lee in his office and made mention of that in the 1960 Republican Convention. In an open letter to a detractor (such as yourself) explained exactly why he admired him and his priciples.

      What in the hell is your actual motive? It certainly isn’t the truth, and you actually know it isn’t the truth. You call it the “national narrative”, as if you realize its a contrived creation meant to somehow ameliorate the current political parties with history. To actually attempt to reconcile Lincoln’s own policies and legislative actions with anything conservative is futile at best.

      Report Post » UnreconstructedLibertarian  
  • So
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:42pm

    He’s gone mad.

    To the looney bin with him.

    Report Post »  
  • bioya1
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:41pm

    The British Labor party is only slighly ahead of our own Dimocrat party. Both parties have turned their backs on what made their countries great and are selling them out for votes.

    Report Post » bioya1  
  • Endstatism
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:40pm

    Livingstone was well known in the UK as having communistic leanings. His nickname while mayor of London was Red Ken.

    Report Post » Endstatism  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on March 20, 2012 at 10:54am

      No really…how much of a threshhold for this stuff do Londoners have?

      Report Post »  
  • qzak491
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:31pm

    .
    Pure evil takes many forms. The anti-Christ looks like one of the good guys. “The serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field”, beware of serpents in common clothes.

    Report Post »  
    • db321
      Posted on March 20, 2012 at 2:47am

      I’m covered by the Blood of Jesus – I’m filled with the Holy Ghost – I have the power of discernment – the Anti-Christ will not look like a good guy to me – I will have the Word of God guiding me not to be deceived – like so many will even the wisest among us.

      Report Post » db321  
  • AJAYW
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:30pm

    Obama the salma will be bring it to us sooner than you think

    Report Post »  
  • BrerRabbit
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:26pm

    Just finished reading ‘ The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam’ by Spencer. Evidently this fellow has not read it.

    Report Post »  
    • acovenantinblood
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:40pm

      Try The Islamic Antichrist by Richardson and Ishmael: A Natural History of Islamism and it’s Relation to Christianity by Arnold. Both great books that speak volumes as well.

      Report Post » acovenantinblood  
  • disenlightened
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:22pm

    I’ve believed and told everyone I know that Islam was slowly being pushed by the Left. A loosening of immigration from Muslim countries has been intentional since the early Clinton years – and to a lesser extent during the Carter years. Liberals have learned that communism lacks a “higher power” component people seem to need that communism’s “the collective” just doesn’t provide. They realized they needed some type of religious component. Christianity was not an option for them because it’s associated too much with freedom and individualism. For two thousands years, Christian nations have been the home of creativity, ingenuity and free-thinking, qualities in a people not desired by statists.

    Islam is perfect for the statist’s needs. It requires strict discipline and rigid adherence to a daily routine. The arts and science are diminished or even banned, and individualism is shunned. It provides that missing “high power” that communism has lacked. It’s perfect training to create a submissive society that easily dominated by a strong central power. It even allegedly has the same God as Christians and Jews, which should make the transition easier.

    Report Post » disenlightened  
    • The Gooch
      Posted on March 20, 2012 at 11:40am

      But Islam won‘t tolerate most of the left’s sacred cows. That’s were this suicide pact falls apart. Sure, leftists can and will devolve to the “by any means necessary” mode of thinking. Islam doesn’t burden itself with moral dilemmas; it exists in a perpetual state that there is one truth: Whatever the hell the Koran and its interpreters assert. This is not the left using Islam. This is Islam using the left. And the left, in its irrepressible drive to produce useful idiots marches right into the lair of the spider.
      There are more Muslims than leftists. Much of what you see in Europe is an anxiety to please (or at least attmept to subdue) the most volatile Muslims. “If I can show them I’m on their side, surely they’ll leave me alone.” Yeah, sure.
      Leftist/nihilists/progressives… there is no place for them in a fundamentalist Islamic world. And as Islam encroaches into politics, it never recognizes a seperation between church and state. A moderate Islamic state… there’s an oxymoron you can have fun with trying to define. Only full-blown fear can account for voices on the left who knowingly embrace this merger. I’m sure there is a small voice crying inside, “We can use this! We can change them with our tolerance! This can work!” That is the unspoken cry of desperation that will be laughed at in the end.
      Never again, right? Yeah, we’ll see about that. Straight up fear… it makes for history’s sad, little collaborators.

      Report Post »  
  • TRONINTHEMORNING
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:20pm

    I posted a similar statement on another thread about a book by Carol Falsani called GOD FACTOR which came out in ‘04. Obama was interviewed and declared, about his ‘Christianity’…”All paths lead to the same place.” The definition of Christianity is quite dogmatic and our prez is off the reservation with his. Of course he’s off on most things as well.

    Report Post »  
    • SacredHonor1776
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 9:16pm

      The new definition of “Christianity” = “Christ was a human prophet of Allah that came before Muhammed. He didn’t die on the cross, but Allah tricked those in attendance, while he escaped”..

      Report Post »  
  • MammalOne
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:12pm

    We should have invaded England when we had the chance.

    Report Post » MammalOne  
  • Smokey_Bojangles
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:10pm

    England swings like a pendulum do
    Infidels hangin’ in two by twos
    Crescent moons hanging on the Tower of Big Ben,
    Having sex with the little children

    Report Post » Smokey_Bojangles  
  • The Gooch
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:06pm

    Leftism and Islam both depend on subjugation. These might appear to be kindred spirits… both using the other to meet an end. But Islam will not tolerate many of the left’s sacred cows. Leftists are just too dumb/crazy/ignorant/naive… something… to admit it. To assume they will be spared and allowed to cling to their secular and prurient ways is laughable. As always, much of the left devolves to being useful idiots for totalitarians. Party on, dudes.

    Report Post »  
  • WeekendAtBernankes
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:06pm

    Search his name over at Daily Mail, his laundry list reads like some kind of chimera of Specter, Teddy, and Blago.

    Report Post » WeekendAtBernankes  
  • WeekendAtBernankes
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:04pm

    This guy was mayor of London from 2000-2008 if that tells you anything about the state of Once-Great Britain.

    Report Post » WeekendAtBernankes  
  • spirited
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:04pm

    The last part of the farewell sermon:

    “…All those who listen to me shall pass on my words to others and those to others again; and it may be that the last ones understand my words better than those who listen to me directly. Be my witness, O God, that I have conveyed your message to your people.”

    >It’s 2012…It’s not getting better.

    Report Post » spirited  
  • danboy53
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:00pm

    Happy to see that this sickness is not confined to the US.

    These people need to be marginalized from society.

    Liberalism is proving to be a mental illness the more they open their mouths.

    I look forward to the day when they are purged from society.

    Report Post »  
  • lodgerat
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 7:57pm

    This guy is out of his mind. What a jerk! His Moooslim friends would cut his head off as fast as they would any infidel.

    Report Post » lodgerat  
  • TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 7:55pm

    Ron Paul would ABSOLUTELY LOVE THIS GUY… to run with HIM… as Ron Paul has said that radical Islam is no threat to the United states, and the threat of Islamic terrorists have been greatly exaggerated.

    Report Post » TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12  
    • oldguy49
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:01pm

      yep, the relegion of peace………we will use your poitical correctness to take you over peacefully and then subjugate or kill you……….islam

      Report Post »  
    • TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:05pm

      OLDGUY. Or, as in Ron Paul’s case… his ignorance.

      Report Post » TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12  
    • justangry
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:15pm

      Oh yeah, Ron Paul wants to implement Sharia in the United States. I’m thowing the BS flag on that one Time2.

      Report Post » justangry  
    • Smokey_Bojangles
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:15pm

      Yeah,Guess buy searching all those old people and toddlers The TSA has caught them all.I guess all those Sons of Camels are running around America blowing stuff up as we speak.

      Report Post » Smokey_Bojangles  
    • TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:31pm

      JUST. How is it that Ron Paul, for all his apparent wisdom concerning the meaning of the Constitution, is apparently oblivious to its underpinnings? The Constitution and Declaration find their foundations on spiritual verities from which they cannot be removed and still stand. But that seems to be lost on Paul. Our freedom is found in the one true God and our Savior Jesus Christ. All of our laws are based on (well originally, at any rate) the Ten Commandments and sundry biblical principles, all antithetical to Shariah. And yet it appears that Paul does not get this.

      Shariah demands the eradication of all but Islam. Therefore it demands the eradication of the very foundation of our government. But Paul does not appear to perceive a conflict of interests with accommodating the very group of “believers” that seeks our destruction. It is as though he is unable to comprehend ideologically driven purpose.

      Report Post » TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12  
    • TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:53pm

      “I don’t see Islam as our enemy.” ~~ Ron Paul ~~

      Report Post » TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12  
    • justangry
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 9:46pm

      Paul’s an evangelical Christian. He doesn‘t talk about it on the campaign trail because he believes it’s pandering. I don‘t really get what you’re asking. Sharia and the founders ideas are incompatible. He wants the country to be ran the way it was setup by those founders. Moving away from those founding principles is what has made us susceptible to Sharia, not Paul’s vision of how the country should be ran. While Sharia may demand that all but Islam be destroy, we do have the ocean as a buffer. I mean how would they get here? Our southern border is the most logical way they’d come, but Paul wants to secure it with troops. They don’t have a fleet capable of transporting an invasion force nor could they get past our navy. I just don’t see them as a threat to our security. I mean, I wouldn’t let a bunch of people from Jihadist countries come over here. RP tried to pass a bill that would cut off issuing Visas to those countries. I probably didn’t give you a good enough answer, but that’s all I got.

      Report Post » justangry  
    • justangry
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 10:06pm

      I don’t believe every muslim supports Sharia Law. They’ve kind of been fighting among themselves over that. Due to our intervention, the pro Sharia muslims are gaining control.

      Report Post » justangry  
    • ianmc002
      Posted on March 20, 2012 at 6:03pm

      TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12

      lol Time…more ignorant statements. Yeah, all Islamist’s want to destroy us lol.

      Here you go Time…you gotta turn off Beck for a moment and LISTEN. I do respect Dylan for actually telling the WHOLE truth.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKNumvnwAO8&feature=my_favorites&list=FLa2bjraOM-M_Pv1AqTgOQmQ

      Report Post » ianmc002  
  • TRONINTHEMORNING
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 7:53pm

    Cool; closer and closer to Christ returning. It’s totally amazing! Could be tomorrow, could be next year; could be in a hundred years. Just seems like rapture is around the corner.

    Report Post »  
    • momrules
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:00pm

      Yes Tron, it does. I feel it too. I tell everyone I know that I look at what is happenig in the world through Biblical eyes. I can’t wait to go Home.

      Report Post »  
    • justangry
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:13pm

      I’m hoping we can be the meek that inherit the earth. Wouldn’t that be cool? Pearly gates and golden streets aren’t my coup of tea. I’d prefer a nice quiet stream with small mouth bass and a fly rod.

      Report Post » justangry  
    • MammalOne
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:16pm

      People have been saying that for a looooooooong time. Could be another 3,000 years. Or another. Or another. Or another… One day my lost doggy will come home.

      Report Post » MammalOne  
    • kentuckypatriot
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:17pm

      @ MOM;
      I feel it also, however, I can’t convince my family and friends, they all think I’m nuts. I am forced ( unfortunately ) to realize my ship has left without them.

      Report Post » kentuckypatriot  
    • TRONINTHEMORNING
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:24pm

      @JUST

      You got the right idea! But some mean, nasty times are gonna play out first. According to my belief system, I ain’t gonna be here for the fireworks; but when the smoke clears, it’s gonna be groovy!

      Report Post »  
    • kentuckypatriot
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:29pm

      You know what else I’ve noticed? I’m Catholic, and when I go to church on Sundays, hearing the Gospel and sometimes the readings of the things written long, long ago, about how Jesus talks about evil. warning His disciples of things, so much of those words ( to me ) apply right now. Very eye opening to say the least.

      Report Post » kentuckypatriot  
    • momrules
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:39pm

      Kentucky…….I have family and friends who don’t believe me either. It used to drive me crazy with worry but I had to let it go. I still pray daily for them to “hear” and I will keep telling them what I believe. Be Happy Kentucky.

      Just……..See, we do agree on some things. A river or a lake with a cabin and a wood stove. Oh, and dogs.

      Report Post »  
    • Zeus In A Speedo
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 11:04pm

      @ Mom and Kentucky – I feel the exact same thing. My wife doesn’t believe this; thinks I am nuts for the food storage ,too. But my best friend said earlier today, “Time to get your affairs straight with God. The World is wacky right now. And the air feels strange – heavy.”

      I was amazed when he said this about the air. To me the air feels, “clammy” the past two months.

      Something is brewing involving the forces of good and evil. Too many strange coincidences – and I do not believe in coincidences.

      Report Post » Zeus In A Speedo  
  • lukerw
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 7:49pm

    After we fight the Liberals, here… we will have to move against the Old British Empire!

    Report Post » lukerw  
    • Chuck Stein
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 8:23pm

      There is no “Old British Empire” anymore. This article is further proof of that.

      Report Post »  
  • Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 7:48pm

    Hey, what other religion can you Honor Kill someone, have sex slaves, multiple wives, and have sex with children, all in the name of a religion. Sure, that will unite the whole world, except women may have a small problem with that, and gays. Nothing a few stones won’t cure, though.

    Report Post » Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 7:47pm

    Great, another radical nutcase in a position of authority.

    Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
  • spirited
    Posted on March 19, 2012 at 7:45pm

    Is this for real ?

    Report Post » spirited  
    • CatB
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 7:57pm

      Sadly I would say yes … look at our own White House .. who does he “honor” …

      Report Post »  
1 2

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love