Ancient Men Stayed in Caves While Nomadic Women Roamed About
- Posted on June 7, 2011 at 2:49pm by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
Traditionally, men have been looked at as the travelers, roamers and hunter-gatherers. But, who ever said that commonly held tradition always translates into universal reality? New research indicates that pre-human females were the nomads, while males chose to stay close to home (in their man caves, naturally).
So, with very little to go on, you’re probably wondering how scientists made this determination. In an effort to better understand our ancestors, researchers studied African “fossil teeth.” According to TIME’s NewsFeed:
Researchers examined 19 chompers that belonged to our extinct antecedents, Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus. The teeth, unearthed in two South African caves, suggest that half of the female inhabitants hailed from afar, while 90% of the males were homegrown.
The researchers discovered this by testing the enamel on the teeth for strontium, which varies by region and is absorbed from the soil by plants and animals. While the homebody men shared similar levels of the naturally-occurring element, the ladies’ strontium isotope levels varied, indicating that they came from far and wide.
The USA Today quips that these male hominids “lik[ed] their man caves.” Now that scientists have begun to unlock some interesting tidbits about our ancestors, there are new questions emerging. Why did males stay close to home and women roam? What fueled these gender roles? Jeffrey Laitman, director of the Center for Anatomy and Functional Morphology at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, says that determining the reasons for these behaviors will likely be tough. He said:
“I think they’re going to have to extrapolate a bit, but at least we have the beginnings of the story. I don’t think this is by chance — I think their data is real, and they’re cracking open the behaviors of our ancestors.”
Sandi Copeland, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Colorado, believes that these revelations could be the start of the pre-human sense of community. This would have intriguing revelations for the social sciences, as the AP notes that community continues to be an important element in communities across the globe. Tracking its beginnings would potentially be immensely beneficial to the field. Watch Copeland explain this important research below:
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 682 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 646 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 523 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 360 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 314 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 166 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 203 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 146 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Scathing New Ad Capitalizes on Rep. Ryan‘s ’Fading Obama Posters’ Remark 124 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 166 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (181)
Butterbean74
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:00pmOk, lets get this straight.
On the 6th day God created man. Denotes mankind in general.
7th day he rested.
Sometime after that he formed “The Man Adam” eth ha adahm from the ground. Approx. 6,000 years ago.
Cain went east to the land of Nod and took a wife. This wife undoubtedly from the 6th day creation.
We have plenty evidence of many creatures that God created in the first earth age.
That’s right, first earth age. There are 3 earth ages and 3 simultaneous heavenly ages.
We are currently in the 2nd earth age and close to the end of that.
Read 2nd peter chap 3.
Also, a day with the Lord is as a Thousand years and a Thousand years is as a day.
The Earth is millions if not billions of years old. 4.6 Billion by most accounts.
I approximate that this earth age started between 12 and 14 thousand years ago by major destruction and subsequent extinctions that occured then.
The Bible is the true word of God and needs to be understood.
Hope this helps.
Report Post »Butterbean74
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:19pmhttp://www.therain.org/appendixes/app146.html
Some good info. on learning about the destruction of the first earth age.
Report Post »Uechi
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:55pmSome more pseudo science. If Humanoids where anything like living apes today then their behavious was probably similar. I don’t knowabout of Chimps, Orangs or Baboons kidnapping females but another mamal species Purpoises do. It makes a lot more sense to believe that female DNA would be more varied if this was the case it would also insure against too much inbreeding. For all the anti-evolutionists God created everything, Humans as well as monkeys and apes unless there was someone else doing creations.
Report Post »Voice-O-Reason
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:40pmUmm, there are so many other ways to interpret this same data.
Report Post »teddrunk
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:39pmGod created Humans, not Pre-Humans…nice try with monkey teeth.
Report Post »capecodsully
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:32pmMen went outside their villages for a fresh gene pool, women were the ones to give up their peeps and go join the man’s family. Just look what happens when family members reproduce, you get dumb a$$ liberals.
Report Post »trs6800
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:23pmThere are any number of conclusions that can be drawn from this study. The one presented is the one designed to bring in more research dollars.
Report Post »Ironeagle
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:21pmWhat BS.
Report Post »Woo
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:19pmAnd the emasculation of the male species continues…..
Report Post »DiscoBall
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:16pmCreationism and evolution are both theory. Believe what you want because nobody can PROVE it. Pray for the present and future, not the past.
Report Post »NuffSaid
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:15pmIs it possible that females were rejected from their birth caves by superior, established females and learned to use charm to gain entrance to new caves were no one knew what they were really like?
Why is it that some new factoid has to be turned into some stupid idea about “gender difference?” Could it be that ancient men were dominated by ancient women as in New York City today?
Shove a bunch of women out into the forest today and see what they will do to survive? Time Magazine, oh that’s the one with Hitler on the cover. Commies!
Report Post »bglaidlaw
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:15pmIsn’t it just as likely that:
a) the women were captives from other tribes … the males having been killed in battle
or
b) the women were those left homeless when their male companion died, so roamed to find a tribe that would take them in
or
c) when a couple formed, the woman left her tribe and joined with the man’s tribe?
These are all patterns we find in the civilizations in recorded history … why presume differently?
Report Post »SREGN
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:12pmIt was the honey-do lists.
Report Post »NuffSaid
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:11pmDoes the term traffic-ing in females have ant meaning here?
Report Post »Dexter Alarius
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:10pmOh, it couldn’t have been because the males dragged off the women from neighboring tribes after raids, or anything like that. No, no. It MUST be because the women were ‘Nomads’ and the men were couch potatos.
Report Post »Mister X
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 5:25pmRight on Dex. Just more left wing liberal crap that says “Ugh, girl good, boy bad. Grunt” Prog BS.
Report Post »PatriotSmith
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:09pmHey why leave the man cave? You all your stuff!
Report Post »MtnLou
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:09pmSeems to me that the men went on raids to neighboring tribes and stole the women. Seems a more likely an explaination than men sitting in caves letting their women roam around
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:26pmMy first thought also.
Report Post »RN MOM
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:28pmI agree
Report Post »Mister X
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 5:22pmThat is what I said also. “Hey Grob, lets take a trip over the mountain, bash some heads in and bring back some of the Zorga babes”. That is what I would have done. LOL
Report Post »Joan Of Argghh
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:08pmWell, duh. There’s shoe stores out there.
Report Post »American Dad
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:06pmso back then the girls liked shopping?
Report Post »momprayn
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:03pmIt’s my belief that there was no “pre-humans” either. Surprised this is on the Blaze. I base that not only on the Bible, which I believe is from God and true, but from scientific information that further confirms it – to any libs/nonbelievers out there.
Report Post »There‘s abundant scientific evidences out there that disprove Darwin’s evolution, including new DNA evidence re his “tree of life” theory. One such site with tons of scientific evidence from physics, astronomy, etc. by scientists and former atheists that there had to be “Intelligent Designer” is:
http://evolutionfacts.blogspot.com/ Another: http://www.dancingfromgenesis.wordpress.com
The burden of proof is on those that believe in Darwin’s evolution.
** “A mind bent on suppressing or hindering the truth will ultimately find the lie it is chasing.” ** – Ravi Zacharias
GENEPAGLIARI
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:28pmDarwin himself disavowed his theory before he died.
Report Post »1stAmendment
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 2:57pmThe world was created 5771 years ago, and I get it from better scientist, “the old testament”!
Report Post »Blacktooth
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:13pmI would suggest you re-read the account of creation in Genesis. The earth was created first and when it was finished to God’s satisfaction, he then created man and then later, the woman. This entire process could have been many thousands of years from start to finish. Using Bible chronology it can be determined that mankind has been on earth around 6000 years now. The earth itself…?
Report Post »MyeyesRbleeding
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:24pmI thought that May 21st was the 7000th year anniversary of The Great flood.
Report Post »Nobamazone
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:08pmblacktooth
Report Post »you believe there is an all powerful creator that needed to take millions of years to get it good enough? The Creator that I believe in got it right the first time, He said let it be, it was, and it was good! Many Christians have bought that “we can have it both ways” lie, NO we can’t.
1stAmendment
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:26pm@BLACKTOOTH
Report Post »The entire creation process only took 6 days!
emcee
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:35pmWow.
This is why it’s impossible to do an over-the-top parody of Young-Earth Creationists.
Report Post »Old Truckers
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 5:55pmCould the creative “Days” be longer than a 24 hour day? Could the “Days” be periods of time lasting for a thousand years, or perhaps two thousand years? Does it make sense that the six creative days are literally 24 hr days?
Report Post »Psalm 90:4 For a thousand years are in your eyes but as yesterday when it is past,
And as a watch during the night.
Old Truckers
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 6:07pmIn God’s eyes a creative day can be any length He wants it to be, even a short 3 or 4 hour watch in the middle of the night.
Report Post »Untameable-kate
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 6:28pmOld Trucker beat me to it.
What is one day to a being that is eternal. In the eye od God, one day could be a billion years. He doesn’t have to be on our timeline.
Report Post »Blacktooth
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 6:41pmIn the Genesis creation account each of the six “Days” had a beginning and an end.
Then the seventh “Day” began.
Where in the Bible does it say the seventh day ended? After some 6000 years, we are still in the seventh day!
So, is it plausible that the previous six “Days” could have lasted as long as the seventh day has?
Hebrews 4:1-11 ( focus on verse 9)
Report Post »1stAmendment
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 6:53pm@BLACKTOOTH
Report Post »your not reading properly
Your translating it so it should make sense for your version
But that’s not what it says !
Blacktooth
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 7:05pm1stAmendment,
Report Post »You raise an objection but give no explanation.
I do think I know how to read properly and I do understand what I read.
Maybe it’s you that has a misunderstanding of what we are talking about. True faith in our Creator requires us to use reason, and not be conditioned to accept false teachings about the “Days” being only 24 hours long.
But, in the end you can believe whatever you want.
LOOKING_BOTH_WAYS
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 2:56pmThis would explain Sara Paylin and Todd ……….. I hope you all can take a joke ..;o)
Report Post »Scaz
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:36pmAnd their Jesus ponies! :)
Report Post »On The Bayou
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 2:56pmThat explains why they still roam today.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on June 8, 2011 at 1:30amGirl just want to have fun
Report Post »Lloyd Drako
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 2:56pmWere the females really roaming around while the males stayed put, or were the males just in the habit of mating with females from other groups? Neither of the two species mentioned, especially robustus, is thought to be ancestral to us anyway.
Report Post »VRW Conspirator
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:13pmI am with you Lloyd…
Report Post »what ever happened to the idea of Cavemen beating the Cavewoman on the head and dragging her away by the hair…
a more likely reason that the women are more diverse geographically is that hunting parties of men went out to gather food…encounter other tribes…fight and take the women..or trade their food for the women…
i mean think about it…men with spears and clubs looking for meat and food come upon a tribe whose men are also away looking for food…they raid the cave…drag the women back home…and there you have it…
NO big secret…the men driven by food and sex took what they wanted whenever and wherever they found it…then go back to their Man-cave….DUH…..
BlazingPatriot
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:19pm~ Yabba Dabba Doo! ~
Report Post »CaptainKook
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:25pm” Yabba Dabba Doo! ”
POST OF THE DAY!
Report Post »1stAmendment
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 2:54pmI don’t believe in pre-human!
Report Post »There’s no way scientist can know this!
KickinBack
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:08pmMale lions lay around while the females go out to work. Does that mean that lions are also pre-human?
Report Post »tompaineknowsthescore
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:17pmthis is not a matter of belief
Report Post »there are tonnes of data supporting the existence of pre-human species of upright ape.
Where to you reckon the skull in the picture came from?
I Hear the Wolves
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:29pmThe skull in the photo does look like a primate to me, but I have a better theory…baby Nephilim. Trust me, folks. As in the days of Noah, so shall it also be…in 2011? Mayhap…
Report Post »1stAmendment
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:32pm@TOMPAINEKNOWSTHESCORE
Report Post »If you take your info from pictures, and believe something a scientist can’t prove, and those things, you still have a lot to learn! (scientists also tell me that there’s something out there called global warming)!
Old Truckers
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 5:43pm“Ancient Men Stayed in Caves While Nomadic Women Roamed About.”
Really? Talk about speculation, Wow.
Report Post »How can “scientist’s” speculate on these matters and yet condemn a Bible reader for believing in a creator?
Bonnieblue2A
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 2:53pmDid anyone actually doubt that men have failed to evolve?
Report Post »CaptainKook
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 2:58pmThis CAN’T be true. The Earth is only 6,000 years old, so I hear.
Report Post »Joe Palin
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:00pmThe men were of course herding dinosaurs, that were kept indoors to maintain their body heat.
Report Post »The_Almighty_Creestof
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:01pmPlease tell me that no government funds/taxpayer money was used to come up with this “curiosity/bathroom reading material”…I mean, who gives a rats booty?
Show us how to grow food in the desert, show us how to replenish the rapidly receding seas, show us how to build without destroying the earths forrests and its inhabitants, show us how to use genetics to create sheep that tell muslim men “Sorry Mo baby, I have a headache tonight”…
Report Post »Blacktooth
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:04pmCaptainKook,
The record of man’s existence is indeed just 6,000 years, but the earth has been here for some unknown amount of years. We cannot say when the the earth was created eons ago.
Report Post »NSDQ
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:05pmArrogance and Sensationalism Spun into Science Behold We Have Data, Give Us Funding, Justify Our Existence, Bah!
Report Post »Gold Coin & Economic News
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:06pmNeanderthal dudes stayed in their man caves and watched the NBA Finals. Is there a problem with that?
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:06pm@BonnieBlue:
In the case of evolution, I have always held to the theory that the DC Political Professionals are in fact the devolved relations of the apes…in the case of Weiner, there is much supporting evidence.
Report Post »cessna152
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:07pmThen men were watching the game while the women shopped…still happening today. Next…
Report Post »chiefparker
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:09pmHe got the house and she had to walk, See what social justice has done for us.
Report Post »WHAT? I’m supposed to be surprised man can be territorial…..DUH
OK3Wire
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:12pmLOL. Good one.
Truth is, the women just followed the Tupperware salesmen around Africa and stopped when they got tired. After awhile, they’d get bored and take up with the Fuller brush salesmen who would stop by the village and move on.
Besides, the men HAD to stay in their caves. If they hadn’t, they would never have been called CAVE MEN. And then there wouldn’t be any cave men in Geico commercials. And unemployment would be even higher than it is now.
Elementary, actually. :-)
Report Post »BlazingPatriot
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:16pmOf course!
The men were in their cool caves making all them cave drawings while the women were outdoors
Report Post »(aka – in the kitchen), barefoot and pregnant.
CaptainKook
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:21pm“The record of man’s existence is indeed just 6,000 years,”
So who did this?
2,600,000 BC: First tools manufactured.
540,000 BC
First evidence of fireplace. … …
300,000 BC
First graves. Existance of graves shows signs of religion. … …
200,000 BC
First anatomically modern humans Link …
175,000 BC
‘Mitochondrial Eve’: She is the most-recent common ancestor of all humans alive on Earth today
Human History Timeline:
Report Post »http://www.serge411.com/
imreddog
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:27pmTo begin with, I didn’t come from an ape. Maybe Obama did, but I didn’t.
Report Post »Second, the earth is millions of years old. There were males and females on earth before Adam. People start counting with Adam and that is why they think that the earth is just over 6,000 years old. Adam was the first Jew but not the first human. I have seen a human footprint in the middle of a dinosaur footprint near Canyon Lake, Texas and that proves that man and dinasaurs existed at the same time.
Third, it has been charistic of men to go wherever it was necessary to get a woman. Quite often it is in sleazy bars but long ago it was a distant village… where they were raising an idiot named Hillary.
Fourth.. no, let’s skip fourth and get a fifth and head out to a sleazy bar for women. :-)
People believe that man came from apes because that is what is taught in government schools. A good reason to not send your children to government schools.
Patrick in AZ
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:29pmHow about: These males went out and brought home captured females from other clans? Or the males in the areas where the females came from were dying off trying to provide for the females (or died because they wanted too – because they were tired of the nagging). Or, and early example of, “once you go black, you won’t go back.” Once you go hominid, you’ll flip your lid? something like that
Report Post »WhiteFang
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:32pmScientist, Bla bla bla. There is no clear evidence that a tooth or skeleton can last for two million years. Two million years!??? Their claims of finding ancient human remains that old is nonsense. They try to impress us with their schooling and scientific terminology in an effort to obscure the real history of mankind and how we got here.
Report Post »GODSAMERICA
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:34pm@The_Almighty_Creestof
Report Post »AMEN!!!! With the emphasis on bathroom reading material.
Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:51pmWhy didn’t they hypothesize that men went afar to capture their women?
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:53pm@The_Almighty_Creestof
Report Post »You have some funny beliefs.
Which seas are rapidly receding? Which forests are being destroyed to build, that you can control?
Lotus503
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 3:57pmDid it ever occur to these scientists that the women were most likely captured from other tribes in battle? The Native Americans were known to capture and mate with women from other tribes,..so why not these prehistoric studs?
Report Post »Who would Jesus bomb?
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:09pmThe women used poodles for pleasure. Still do. That’s part of the reason the men-folk are so frustrated.
Report Post »Polwatcher
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:20pmThe men probably sent the women out to forage and bring back food among the roaming dinosaurs.
Report Post »Bear
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:26pmJesus, the oldest Religious site in the world is Gobekli Tepe, its 13 to 15 thousand years old and yes they dated the finding with multiple methods more then just on rocks around the site! The oldest modern Human found in North or South America is over 10 thousand years old,,90% skeleton intact and yes multiple tests on the Bones were performed and not just on rocks around the site! I am all for freedom of religion so knock you selves out,,,its just sad you use your freedom to enslave yourselves to the idea that man is only 6000 years old and ignore the established evidence dramatically to the contrary! I know you have all been told there are no missing links or no people (remains) found older then 5000 years for the longest time,,and that might have been true in Darwin‘s time and a few decades ago and the Religious still tell you that’s fact but,,,most of the missing links,time lines and family trees have been found, They have even created a living cell with just Chemicals ( no DNA ancestry) by putting chemicals at random in an empty cell wall,,,I guess life can just happen and is still wonderful,,and the mystery isn’t such a mystery!
Report Post »mcFirst
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:27pmAnd they liked pepporoni pizza
Report Post »Dustyluv
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:31pmYou expect us to believe an expert? Hell they are more wrong than my wife is…
Report Post »dancing bear
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:32pmI bet they were traiding the females to other camps.
Report Post »Blacktooth
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:38pmBear,
You cannot PROVE anything that you just posted.
Sorry!
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:41pm@Who would Jesus bomb?
Report Post »Poodles to pleasure themselves with? Haha, I’ve never heard of that.
What do you mean by licking whipped cream?
biohazard23
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:46pmSo here we have the first metrosexuals. They’re hanging out, decorating their “man” caves, watching HGTV and Desperate Troglodytes, and munching on canapes. Big deal.
Report Post »Nervous Investor
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:52pmHmmmmm ….. Sir Winston Churchill once said something like ….. there are lies, dammed lies and (the worst yet) statistics ……
Not that I really care one way or the other (I kind of like my cave) …. but don’cha think there may be more than one explanation for the strontium variances? I will watch the video later so am responding to the text presently. For example, could it be that the women were captured in battles with other tribes / family groups ? or, in primitive times, as a precursor to slavery, maybe the women were traded with other tribes for goods of some sort? What if women simply ate different food from the men and that food was traded from distant parts (like imported soy versus local milk)? The possibilities are as endless as the imagination.
Wonder what would happen if these researchers analyzed teeth dug up in the Caribbean Islands or the State of Mississippi or, God forbid, present day New York?
Report Post »CatB
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:59pmWe women were out looking for sales … not doubt.
Report Post »Mister X
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 5:27pmYeah right. My wife is barely willing to go to the supermarket, yet I travel all over the country. Those gals, ya gotta love em. But nomads they are not.
Report Post »SeasonOfReason
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 5:27pmCommunity is an important part of communities? Wow.
Report Post »Fuul Aluuf
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 5:53pmOf course once a man claimed a good cave, why would he give it up if he didnt have to? The reason the women came from all over is simple…
The men left their cave once a year to go capture women from other caves, then they returned to their castle. Duh.
Report Post »Evileye
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 6:30pmNeeded to be otherwise interbreeding and the end of the species
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 6:33pmcaptainkook may have once been an ape, but,
as for me and my house, God made us in his image.
We did not evolve from some monkey.
‘Splain the big bang, capnkook? Where did the matter come from?
Report Post »moonlight on the bay
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 6:34pmteeheeheehee . . . .
Report Post »snixy
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 6:52pmDuh!! did anyone consider that these women were slaves captured in battle for territory – kill the males and keep the women for breeding – or is that not PC for you?
Report Post »Bear
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 6:59pmBACKTOOT!
You said I could not prove anything I had said ( or wrote about)? I mentioned a few things but I will address one! Go to you tube and simply look up ‘ man made synthetic cell ’!!
A bacterium has been made with DNA that has never existed before( at random ) and has successfully replicated! Creationist have said this is impossible,now that you will know it is,,,,,,,,
I look forward to your apology!
Your friend with the facts,,,Bear!
Report Post »Bear
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 7:03pmBLACKTOOTH,,Sorry I spelled you name wrong!
Report Post »1Sword
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 7:03pmAustralopithecus or Paranthropus. These species occurred in the Plio-Pleistocene(More Recent) era, and were bipedal and dentally similar to humans, but brain size not much larger than modern apes, and lacking characteristics of the genus ****. There not even Human.. We lived along side them and habilis but theres no link between us, nor is there any Dna or other solid Evidence why were even in the catagory, they probably all went extinct because **** Sapians Killed them in there caves. I guess you could say theres a link between all animals and Humans but i even question that considering 20% or more of our DNA is unexplained not found on earth (Alien).. Lets face it Were Man not monkeys even tho they so much want to believe it I think we need to go back to our prehistoric Human Killing the cave ape days and rid these monkeys out of the white house.
Report Post »avenger
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 7:19pmsure..these are the same aholes that promote global warming….how the hell can you come with this crap from fossils…
Report Post »Blacktooth
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 7:23pmBear,
Okay, I went overboard in my blanket statement, I apologize :-)
Now that they have come up with a synthetic cell, will it replicate itself and become a living creature, able to live and function on it’s own, procreate and exhibit a worthwhile design? Or will it just sit there in its artificial environment producing nothing?
“Only God can create a tree.”
Report Post »Bear
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 7:34pmBLACKTOOTH!
Neither one of us will know that answer,it would take hundreds of millions of years! And if there is a God,,I would love to see the tree he makes out of it! Personally I think this is Dangerous Science at the moment,,,I can only imagine the deadly knew Viral weapons that could be developed and until the race of mankind is more peaceful,,,maybe this tech should be shelved! Apology accepted, thank you!
Report Post »Docroc
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:11pmI was talking to an Indian chief he told me they would go from the Vancouver BC all the way up to Queen Charlotte Islands i said why? He said to get woman!
Report Post »*************************
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:17pmThat GORILLA SKULL certainly MAKES A MONKEY out of GOVERNMENT GRANT researchers.
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on June 7, 2011 at 11:27pmThis is a lie.
Men have travelled the earth for hundreds of thousands of years before “cavemen” existed.
We are much, much, much older than previously asserted. Try MILLIONS of years, possibly HUNDREDS of millions of years…
Report Post »