Coulter Bashes Newt: ‘Tied With Ron Paul As the Least Conservative Candidate’
- Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:27am by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
Conservative pundit Ann Coulter appeared on Fox News’ “Hannity” last night, where she discussed her take on the Republican presidential field. In addition to delving into Obamacare and her unabashed endorsement of Mitt Romney, Coulter spent a fair amount of time railing against Newt Gingrich, calling him one of the least conservative GOP candidates competing for the ticket.
As the interview commenced, Coulter wasted no time defending her faith in Romney, proclaiming, ”The two most conservative candidates who are still standing now are Michele Bachmann and Mitt Romney.”
While the pundit likes Bachmann, she says that, by no fault of her own, the congresswoman has a resemblance to Sarah Palin. This, she contends, may be hurting her image. With that in mind, Coulter is holding Romney up as the most likely candidate to pull off an Obama defeat.
During the exchange, Hannity took some time to call Coulter out on a February 2011 prediction she made at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). During a question and answer period, a woman asked Coulter for her take on the 2012 presidential election. Her response? ”If we don’t run Chris Christie, Romney will be the nominee and we’ll lose.” Coulter, of course, later endorsed the very man she said would lose to Obama.
Christie officially announced that he isn’t running back in October, but he subsequently endorsed Mitt Romney. Hannity challenged Coulter on her change of heart, which she explained by highlighting recent developments in the political landscape. Watch Coulter’s CPAC comments, below:
As the discussion continued, it took an abrupt turn to the conservative credentials of both Ron Paul and Gingrich. ”I have a problem with Ron Paul’s foreign policy. And some of his writings that went on for a decade,” Hannity said.
Coulter, seeing an opening, decided to dive into her negative assessment of Gingrich, while comparing his purported lack of conservative ideals to Paul’s. ”I have a problem with Newt Gingrich’s big government conservatism,” she said. “I think of the candidates on the stage, Newt Gingrich is tied with Ron Paul — and only Ron Paul because of his foreign policy — as the least conservative candidate on the stage.”
“The question is how do we beat Obama. I think we beat Obama with the most conservative candidate and with the one who has been elected in a very liberal state,” Coulter later said, reiterating her support for Romney.
Watch Coulter’s appearance on “Hannity,” below:
Coulter isn‘t the first major media figure to cast doubts on Gingrich’s conservatism. Glenn Beck, among others, has voiced concerns over his “progressive” past. In fact, even MSNBC hosts Joe Scarborough and Chris Matthews have been baffled by the conservative support for Gingrich.
One man has even started a website called Thecaseagainstnewt.com “dedicated to warning conservatives that if Newt Gingrich is the Republican presidential nominee, that President Obama is virtually guaranteed to be reelected.”
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 682 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 647 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 523 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 360 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 314 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 167 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 203 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 146 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Scathing New Ad Capitalizes on Rep. Ryan‘s ’Fading Obama Posters’ Remark 124 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 167 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (771)
MUSE_FENDERTAMA
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:49amAnn Coulter=Tied with Jon Huntsman for least popular fake conservative.
Sounds these days like she just opens her mouth to spew out controversial and divisive statements to sell some more books.
If it’s principles you want, go with Ron Paul. I‘ll be voting for him in the Iowa Caucus next month because even though I don’t agree perfectly with every stance he’s taken, I know he will push this country back towards the grounds of liberty, truth, and prosperity. Do conservatives really foresee him implementing policies as president that are anti-conservative???? Every one of his stances will move the country back to the right, and he is a sure-fire way to get the job done. Everyone else is just a hit-and-miss, hope its not another Bush candidate
I strangely also appreciate newt, though he is by far not my first pick. His strange stances on immigration (and english as the official language push), civil liberties, and ambiguous economic stances are a turn-off to me.
Report Post »With that being said, I‘d choose a ’90s conservative republican over a 2000s Bush neocon robot any day.
oldguy49
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:01amcoulter has lost me, she has become a paid ad for the rinos..now i really like michelle malkin………………
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:03amYeah, the last person she should call a conservative is a strict Constitutionalist who wants to conserve the Constitution as written and not trample on it at his convenience. Maybe walking around with her Germ Mask on all the time has caused rarified air to make her high or something.
Neocons, meh.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:04am@indy1
To a Paulie, “neocon” means any person who is not Alex Jones or Ron Paul.
Report Post »escape_from_socialism
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:04amI’m voting for Ron Paul.
Report Post »smackdown33
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:04amNeocon: http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_196286.html
Don’t confuse neocon with this: http://www.haaretz.com/news/features/white-man-s-burden-1.14110
Educate yourself.
Report Post »grudgywoof
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:11amChristie is a PROGRESSIVE
Report Post »Red1492
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:11amThis woman is HIGH. Newt is no conservative, but no one is more dead on that Ron Paul on what direction this country needs to take. RP may not be the most impressive orator and may have the personality of a moldy turnip but he knows what he’s talking about.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:12amINDY1 No.. Neo Con does not mean “the Jews” it means we lie to the public to keep our people in a continual ‘iIndustrial Complex” war..and that means that there are certain people making a fortune off of it..Do you think that the Neo Cons giving 10X more financial aide to Israel;s enemies and telling Israel who she can and can’t bomb is helping her? Puh .. leeeeeze.. We just had some jerk put us trillions of dollars in the hole..we are broke..we need to get out of these wars and build our military up here at home. We need our freedom.. We are similiar to dogs who have been tied up our whole lives..not knowing what freedom is and once unleashed..we don’t know where to go or what to do. What’s the definition of insanity? Is is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result? We are in big trouble heading toward further enslavement really fast.. Glenn has been endorsing Bachman almost from the beginning. Gingrich flips and flops to the tune of “who’s got the most money..and he’s cruel. Bachman has a hint of cruelty. .toward our own people.. They are all war mongers…
Report Post »I will vote FREEDOM this time..I will vote the CONSTITUTION..
sWampy
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:18amIn a way she is right, there are NO conservatives left in the conservative field, we need BOLD differences, not PALE PASTELS, we are only left with light pink. ;-(
Report Post »Top_Down
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:21amYou just don’t like her because she insulted your leader. Paul is no conservative, everyone knows this except for his followers, so that is arguable. Remember though, he left the Republican party long ago.
Romney now is one of the most conservative. Everything he fights for now is Conservative. Even giving states the power to govern.
Look at the Tea Party, they back Romney as well. Maybe not those led by Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin but the Tea Party caucus and those endorsed by the Tea Party groups. Look at Christine O’Donnell, she sees the lies people are spreading about him ( http://url2it.com/kmeq )
Truthbeliever2
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:42amI’ve been on the fence for months, but I’ve made my mind up. Ron Paul has my vote. I am voting for the CONSTITUTION!!!
Report Post »FEISTY
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:53amI once heard Christie mention TR in a speech once. He must be a big government progressive. And then he mentioned that FDR’s Fireside chats were a great way to help unify the country. He must be a commie.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:54amMann Coulter attacks Ron Paul?
Captain Adam’s Apple attacks Dr. Gynecologist.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:00amI will vote for Gingrich, warts and all. I will vote for any GOP candidate against Obama. Anyone but Obama..ANYONE BUT OBAMA!
Report Post »Locked
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:08amHer comment doesn’t even make sense. How is she judging “Conservative?” In fiscal matters? In social ones? In adherence to the Constitution?
I could have understood if she meant social conservatives, as neither Ron Paul nor Gingrich are running on a socially conservative nor religious platform. But then she said Romney was a conservative, and he is definitely a weak choice if you mean a social conservative. But does that mean she’s referring to fiscal matters? Gingrich is definitely not conservative in that department, but Ron Paul is the embodiment of the concept… while Bachmann and Romney both support bigger government, if it matches their ends. What about adherence to the Constitution? I’d say that both Gingrich and Paul are more conservative than Bachmann, who seems to think the Constitution is useful when it suits her and should be ignored if it doesn’t. And Romney and the Constitution? Ha.
I think it would be helpful to know what warped definition of “conservative” she’s using. If it’s not relating to social policy, fiscal policy, or Constitutionalism, what is it supposed to be that defines a conservative?
Report Post »Delta_River_Folk
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:29amThose of you that are supporting Newt the AMphibian, I challage you to do your own research. If you are truely a conservative wanting smaller government you will see that Newt is not the answer. Heck, I would rather see Romney the RINO win the GOP and that is not saying much. It all comes down to all the real conservative that were running have been knocked out, and all that is left is a few wackos and a few progressives. When will conservative finally choose a REAL CONSERVATIVE? May God have mercy on us all!
Report Post »justafollower
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:30amUr not joking. I don’t know what Coulter is smoking but, she’s got her head WAAAYYYY too far inside the beltway. She comes off like she thinks she’s so smart too, which really drives me bonkers. I don’t respect much of her opinions on politics.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:36amIt took me a long time to see Ron Paul’s point on his foreign policy. Four years in fact. Now that I see what he means, I am voting for him. He is the closet one to a TRUE Constitutionalist in the field.
If you knuckleheads would pull your head out of your backside and look, you would find that he is right…And if you are concerned about Israel…You are a FOOL! Israel can destroy the Middle East anythime they want to. No one will screw with them, not even Sptitoon Dirtydinnerjacket…Besides, they would blow all his crap up when he gets close to having a nuke….Guarantee it. I stand with Israel, but they are capable on their own…
I will NEVER vote for Newt…Not in a Bazillion years..I will stay home…anyone else would get my vote over Obama. If we get Newt, I for one will not vote unless there is a third party…I will not vote for a Progressive that was chosen for me by Libtardia.
What are you going to do when RP is your candidate? LOL
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:42amLook, all this talk about Neocons, who is conservative, who’s not, and everyone just keeps falling into step. Stop listening to the media. Yesterday, Fox’s Happening Now show in the morning put up a poll asking if the Iowa caucus was held today, who would you vote for with all the candidates names. The last time I looked last night, Paul was winning by a good margin. Today, that poll cannot be seen, no mention on the show today and another poll asking if the presidential election was today, who would you vote for is in its place with only Romney, Gingrich, Obama and Other to choose from. Other is winning with 69% Gingrich 2nd with 19.5% and Romney 7.7% (rounded). BO gets a mere 3.7%. People are waking up!! Hooray! Fox will probably not mention this one on the air either. I call for a boycot of all television media.
Report Post »Do all of you want to shake up the media? Turn them off. Hit all of them where it hurts, their ratings.
GilbertAcct
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:52amQP… I know you don’t like to research anything, but the term neo-conservative was coined by those who proposed the ideology. The neo-cons gave themselves that name. Look up Leo Strauss, Irvin Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Donald Rumsfeld.
Report Post »smackdown33
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:56amI will not vote for just any Republican. Those days are over.
Report Post »It makes no difference whether the bus goes directly to Detroit, or if it makes many stops along the way. It still goes to Detroit. I do not want to go to Detroit.
Democrats are honest about their destination. Progressive Republicans are not. I’d rather have an honest Democrat bus driver than a lying Republican bus driver, if I have to go to Detroit.
I will vote for an honest Republican and let the cards fall.
JRook
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:02pmAnn Coulter is the conservative equivalent to Jane Fonda in terms of relevance. Although Jane Fonda has actually helped people throughout her life so she is at least a decent person. Ann Coulter is just a fake person who wines and sells books to feed the angry mob.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:05pm“ ”we nazicons don’t like his foreign policy of wanting our troops to come home and protect Americas borders. We also don’t like the trillions of dollars that our buddies will lose if the U.S isn’t buuoing yheir rockets and weapons. I want our troops spread so thin they are weakened. It doesnt matter we hav rockets that can reach anywhere in the world in 1 hour..making money at the expensevof naive tax payers is so much better” Ann Clut
http://vimeo.com/6445068
Report Post »libsaredumb
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:06pmProgressives assault and pervert the language. “Conservative” is now another throw away word, it means nothing. Since when does conservatism mean that we police the world? We need a new name for ourselves. Constitutionalists? Originalists? Glenn Beck get to work on this.
Report Post »Naram-Sin
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:08pmRight. Let’s elect the idiot who thinks that radical Islam is our fault, despite it having waged jihad since the time of Mohammad (that’s for more than 1,400 years for all you Ron Paul supporters). Let’s put I guy in charge of our foreign policy who thinks a government of suicide bombers (Iran) will be deterred like the Soviets were if they get the atom bomb. People who think that martyrdom is the best thing they can do in this life (one of Mohammad’s teachings) will not be deterred by the threat of becoming martyrs. I’m sure Ron Paul will look very “conservative” (as opposed to Neville Chamberlainish) when New York disappears because the terrorists in Iran put a bomb on a cargo ship in order to punish the “Great Satan”. Paul might be good as Secretary of the Treasury or head of the Fed, but anyone who votes for him as president is a fool.
Report Post »ranger22x
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:10pmAnyone but Obama!!! Paul,Newt ,Romney does not matter!! If we do not stand behind the nominee then the Democrats will win period!!!
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:13pmCoulter: “Best Fox News shill that looks the most like skeletor with a wig.”
We’re going to WIN Iowa or come in 2nd.
We’re in a solid top 3 in NH. (and gaining)
This is not a few “Ron Paul spammers” living in their mom’s basement.
He has the MOST support of the military.
The MOST support of Independents.
The MOST support of disillusioned Democrats.
The MOST support of TRUE Constitutional Conservatives.
I’d be MORE than willing to take “spankmymonkey” up on his bet that Paul wont win Iowa. Too bad he doesn’t have any money.
Report Post »PresidentDowngrade
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:14pmNo Obama then Beck’s show will evaporate. I really appreciate all that Glen has done until now. He is coming off the rails.
Report Post »netmail
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:15pmOk, is everybody in a circle now? Good, now raise your weapon, aim straight ahead and FIRE. This is what happens when people feast on opinions all day long. Im beginning to think that EVERYBODY is either wrong or lying and it’s wearing me the hell out.
Report Post »smackdown33
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:19pmNaram-Sin, radical Islam is our creation. Eisenhower‘s NSC studied this back in the 1950’s. They concluded that it was our policies that caused the problem.
Report Post »Top_Down
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:21pmUnder whose definition is Ron Paul a Conservative? Not the three legs of the stool as Reagan put it.
Only in the rawest definition: A person who is averse to change and holds to traditional values and attitudes, typically in politics. Take away the desire to fight for it. Such as fighting against the immoral changing of our culture: keeping drugs illegal, same sex marriage, etc. He is no Social Conservative. Fighting to keep freedom whereever it may be lost, throughout the world. He is no Defense Conservative. No one will deny he can take the fiscal conservative definition but he is the earmark king placing them in bills he would never vote for and then gathering up the doe, instead of putting those appropriations of funds in an appropriation bill like they are suppose to, etc.
NOPE RON PAUL IS NO CONSERVATIVE…
Report Post »smackdown33
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:22pmnetmail, one must stay vigilant to protect freedom. Too many have sat on the sidelines for far too long.
Report Post »libsaredumb
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:24pmSome of you sheeple need to actually watch and listen to Ron Paul and quit listening to what MS or Fox want you to think about him. I guarantee you’ll be pleasantly surprised. Don’t let the freakin media tell you what to think. This is important enough to get off your arse and do your homework!
Report Post »Churchill
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:25pmRon Paul 2012!!
Time to take out the trash!
Report Post »jmiller_42
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:28pmDo you like Paul except for his foreign policy?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=I8NhRPo0WAo#!
Report Post »t212112
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:28pmBlaze readers, you really have been disappointing lately. Apparently you’re all having a problem with extrapolation; she said “and only Ron Paul because of his foreign policy (is he not conservative),” and she’s exactly right. Ron Paul’s domestic policy is very conservative, which she acknowledged, however, it’s his foreign policy that is decidedly “progressive.”
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:34pmI live in New Jersey and trust me Christie is by far a piece of crap progressive.
Report Post »Safewright
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:35pmIf we vote Ron Paul in, our country is doomed. He would bury his head in the sand when it came to foreign affairs, he would strip our military down to the bare minimum. The Chi-coms would then be able to take us out. If the fed was ever audited, Moody’s would down grade us so far down our interest alone would doom the country more than it is now. We need someone who would build this nation up with smart plans not radical ones. Our country couldn’t handle our finacial secrets being exposed to the realality that it is in now.
Report Post »Churchill
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:37pmt212112
You really need to educate yourself. Learn the difference between neo-conservatism and conservatism. Paul’s foreign policy is true conservatism. Nation building, spreading democracy, foreign aid etc is progressive foreign policy.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:00pmI never type in all caps, but I’m so excited.
This new video explains perfectly “Ron Paul’s nutty foreign policy”
WHY THEY HATE US! (from the campaign)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPFQaLh-ycM
Report Post »Scottscobig
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:01pmCome on, people. Give Ron Paul a serious look. Give him a chance. Do you want to drive over the cliff a shade more slowly than Obama with someone else or are you interested in an about face and a sprit back to the constitution, freedom and what made us great to begin with?
Report Post »BenFranklinLivesHere
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:04pmAnn Coulter=Pompous two-faced Bimbo
Top Down=Liberal Troll
Ron Paul 2012!!
Report Post »Joshua7
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:07pmThank God she isn’t fooled by this weird Gingrich fever too. I don’t understand how Romney is just accepted as a conservative but I feel the same about Christie anyway.
Report Post »TheCoffinMaker
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:13pmI am a conservative to the deepest darkest nodes of my colon.
There is just something that’s not right with that woman above and beyond her point of view.
That friggin laugh of hers. I gets me so sick to listen to it. That deep, grey poupon slurry of a breath.
Makes my toes curl up in my shoes.
Exit, stage left.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:15pmJust remember, to the far left is total government and far right is total anarchy. The Constitution was just left of Anarchy.
Progressives have slowly progressed us with Social Programs (more Government) and Intervention (more Government). If Ron Paul’s platform is pretty much Constitutional and he is non-interventionist how could he be the least conservative?
Intervention, spreading “democracy” thru financial and military means, and socialistic domestic programs are to the LEFT of the Constitution.
Ann supports Intervention. Ann is to the left of the Constitution. Where do you and your candidates views line up? DON’T BE A LEFTY, VOTE FOR THE CONSTITUTION THRU RON PAUL!
Total==============================================Anarchy
Gov ^
Constitution
I have no respect for a woman who runs to the bar every night cursing like a sailor pretending to be a conservative. Ann is not a traditional conservative. Ann is full of hot air.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:44pm1) Who gives a flying fudge what Ann Coulter thinks? Not I.
2) I know why she is backing Romney, do you? Follow who the big banks support.
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/264837/20111209/ron-paul-newt-gingrich-mitt-romney-funds.htm
3) Like Romneycare is ‘conservative?’ Hmm… didnt Romney start his career as a Liberal Democrat?
4) She’s an establishment talking-head pecker-licker. Who gives 2 sheets about this attention whorre and what her opinion is?
Ps. I wouldnt give a dern if she was for Ron Paul either. Who cares what this demogogue thinks? i form my own opinion, thanks.
Report Post »wilsonj72
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:47pmShe now a RINO Pimp
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 2:11pmPlease read this article referencing an article penned by Gingrich and John Kerry for the New York Times in 2008 regarding Healthcare and how government needs to be involved. I really don‘t think Sarah Palin would be onboard with Newty’s ideas. The article is quite revealing on Newty‘s thoughts on the government’s role in the type of care a patient receives.
If after reading this you do not see where Coulter is coming from regarding Gingrich, then you must be a Big government progressive loving liberal!
http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-cohn/98507/newt-gingrich-health-care-comparative-effectiveness-rationing
Report Post »Kingscairn
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 2:26pmYou don’t think english should be Americas official language, “(and english as the official language push)” ?
Report Post »theaton
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 2:39pmConservatives support destroying the Constitution just as much as Liberals do. Conservatives support the Patriot Act. They support the war on drugs even though nothing in the Constitution gives this authority to the Fed. They support defining marriage even though nothing in the Constitution gives this authority to the Fed. They support telling LGBT people what they may do with their personal property even though nothing in the Constitution gives this authority to the Fed. On and on. Ron Paul or Gary Johnson are our only remaining hope of turning the country around. If it’s neither one of these two, it might just as well be Obama again. I won‘t vote for Obama but I aslo won’t vote for Romney, Gingrich.
Report Post »Red Meat
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 2:41pmNewt sucks and Coulter needs to get her thyroid examined.
Report Post »Goodforall
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 2:44pmShe has become a big nut job-don’t like anything she says anmd I am a true blue conservative. I have no problems with Newt-he is progressive but a very smart man and he can win against Obammy. All he needs is a tea party supported VP running mate-I wish it could be Marco Rubio. Bottom line, we must defeat Obammy-period.
Report Post »mrdbcooper
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 3:04pmron paul…glenn does to alex jones just what he accuses others of doing to him…well glenn, first you ridiculed, now you attack…then ron paul (and jones) wins
Report Post »Pat Houseworth
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 3:07pmRon Paul is no Conservative…he is an excuse maker for not confronting the menace that is Islam. Too bad to, because on economic issues he is right on…sadly, if elected we would be buried by the Islamic Terrorists.
Report Post »Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 3:13pmAnne,
How can you say Newt is tied with Ron Paul on anything. They are opposites. Can you really get any more conservative than Ron Paul? I mean really? The man would strike down everything except the constitution if he could. That was an ignorant statement.
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 3:26pm@ TopDown- umm, s’cuse meeee- It’s obvious you have no idea who the Tea Party is, and they don’t endorse Romneycare.
Report Post »“I” am the Tea Party, and Romneycare is not even close to being someone I’d endorse as a candidate for any government office in the country, not even dog catcher.
V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 3:26pmTop_Down
Reagan is NOT the criteria of conservatism, his “stool” is missing a few legs…
Raygun TRIPLED the national debt under his tenure.
TRIPLED. He definitely wasn’t a fiscal conservative.
“Adverse to Change”? Sounds like somebody has infiltrated with some Obama ideology on the Blaze…talking about Ron Paul is adverse to “change”.
No.
Ron Paul is adverse to Progressivism. To call Paul’s foreign policy “progressive” is side-splitting hilarity. Progressive foreign policy is the US helping Al Qaeda invade Libya, the US helping the Taliban grow poppy, and the US helping the Mexican drug cartels.
Conservative foreign policy is bringing our troops home and stop nation building with hundreds of bases worldwide while the country is BROKE.
Report Post »Yeah_Buddy
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 3:32pmIf Ron Paul would just modify his foreign policies a tad, I’d vote for him. Particularly, protecting American interests while not being the world’s police. Certainly not having hundreds of military bases all over God’s creation would go a long way in re-establishing fiscal order.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 3:43pmTotal==============================================Anarchy
Gov ^ ^ ^ ^
Obama Newt Romney Constitution
^
Ron Paul
Don’t be a lefty, vote Ron Paul!!! Ron Paul will walk us back to our Constitutional Republic and return Liberty and responsibility to the individual!
DON’T BE A LEFTY!!!
Report Post »t212112
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 3:45pm@ Chruchill
It would behoove you to not assume my level of intellectual or historical prowess. I’m well aware of the ridiculous “Neo-Con/True-Con” false dichotomy. It’s not the 19 century anymore; forging strategic allegiances throughout the world is now directly related to protection of American citizens; you know, that pesky “True Conservative” ideal. With continued international technological advancement, attacks from foreign enemies will grow precipitously more likely. Further one cannot appeal to a psychotic person’s “good nature” and/or reason with the unreasonable. Iran will never, ever leave us or our allies alone if we simply leave them alone.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 4:09pmThe secret of Progressives (Communists)
Progressives want to rule the world, an elitist group that tells all serfs what to do thru collectivism.
The USA, a Constitutional Republic granting Liberty and Rights to it’s Citizens, was the only real obstacle in ruling over the World.
So how do you remove the obstacle? Turn it into the very body you want to rule over the world.
Who started the first world Government (league of Nations and UN)? USA, even though it went against the Constitution. Who pays for the UN? USA
Intervention-Progressive as it intervenes in sovereign nation affairs to implement “Democracy” that submits to the USA which is opposite of the Constitution.
Foreign Aid-Progressive bribery to obtain submission of foreign nations which is opposite of the Constitution
Socialistic fiscal policy-Progressive as it turns us into collectivism which is opposite of the Constitution.
Look at how many “conservatives” who believe the USA must intervene in other nation affairs in order to “be safe” or how many believe in SS, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, and welfare.
If you believe in the Constitution than there is no way you can vote for anyone supporting any of the above.
Report Post »stopspendingourmoney
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 4:10pmIf anyone cares about the Constitution and our dollar, better look into Ron Paul, the only one that can save the US dollar and the country from going bankrupt, your choice America…..God help, and bless us all..
Report Post »jonnydoe
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 4:16pmI think (m)Ann should first tell us what her definition of a Conservative actually is before she claims “this one is and this one isn’t”.
Bloated, interventionist government, crony capitalism, and the military-industrial complex are not my idea of small government but that describes the candidates that she usually supports. Just like those twits Hannity and Levin.
Report Post »CptStubbing
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 4:25pmI doubt most of you are paying attention, but the House was discussing HR 2105 last night. This bill is designated, “Iran, North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Reform and Modernization Act of 2011” It pretty much is a bill that would require the government to impose sanctions on any foreign person, business, or government that aids in the proliferation of nuclear technology to these countries. Currently Russia is aiding Iran in nuclear energy technology and China is aiding Iran and North Korea in ICBM technology. Thus, sanctions that we are already beginning to impose on Iran will begin to be imposed against Russia and China. Russia and China have already said that they would be on Iran’s side if the U.S. attacked Iran. Seeing as we placed sanctions on Iran, we are about to place sanctions on any country that aides Iran, and anytime sanctions our placed on a country military action almost always follows; The U.S. is about to start world war 3 without any real diplomatic effort to stop it. Dennis Kucinich was the only person speaking last night that sounded reasonable, he would like for us to work out some kind of diplomatic talks with Iran as opposed to starting another war, which will become much much bigger than what we have seen in Afghanistan or Iraq.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 4:26pm@T212112
“Ron Paul’s domestic policy is very conservative, which she acknowledged, however, it’s his foreign policy that is decidedly “progressive.””
Wow! You think non-intervention is “progressive”? Hahahahaha! No way and you are simply playing words like Progressives.
Intervention, aggression, and meddling in foreign nation affairs is Progressive. It is the MEANS for which provides the ENDS of the Progressive world Government. There is nothing Constitutional about intervention. Nothing, therefore it is clearly progressive.
“Iran will never, ever leave us or our allies alone if we simply leave them alone.”
What is Iran doing to the USA? Nothing but talking smack due to our AGGRESSION in their region. We are actually bugging Iran thru sanctions (method used to get smaller country to attack), assassinating their scientists and flying drones in over their country. Would we talk smack if Iran was in Mexico doing the same to us?
Question: why hasn’t Iran just bought a nuke from Russia since both “hate” us so much and are working together to “topple” us? Can‘t answer that one cause it doesn’t fit your scare tactics for intervention.
You are a lefty!
Report Post »eric6161
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 4:33pmI’m still going to vote for Bachmann… and then against Obama and his communist comrades in the general election.
Report Post »Kenny_D
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 4:34pmCoulter is absolutely correct about Gingrich. He is a long time Washington insider who has made tons of money from his Washington connections. The General Public will not find him acceptable if conservatives continue on with him they will loose. Newt Gingrich is the definition of corruption. Coulter is right when she says Romney is more conservative then Gingrich. Just listen to what the man says and did you hear how he begrudged Romney for the business Romney was in… Sounded like something that would come out of Obama’s mouth.
Report Post »Claudia42
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 4:36pmI bet Ann doesn‘t care all you mindless Paulbots won’t be voting for her choice in the Iowa caucus.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 4:42pmOkie
I told you!
Neocons ARE Liberals! They’re one and the same!
t212112
Neocon/TruConservative isn’t a false dichotomy… the left-right paradigm is the false dichotomy! That‘s why you’re seeing Neocon Bush’s Preemptive War Strategy being continued by Obama under the weak disguise of Humanitarian Aid!
Obama is also continuing Bush’s Police State expansion like the Patriot Act Extension (which he signed) and the Indefinite Detention bill (which he will likely sign), both of which he campaigned on fighting!
We need a contract that says if you reneg on your campaign promises, you are automatically IMPEACHED! Otherwise we will continue to get people who will say one thing, and do the opposite when elected.
I severely doubt that Ron Paul is going to falter on any of his stances.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 4:52pmVechorik, Thank you for that video. It actually brought tears to my eyes. Everyone should watch it, especially people who think Paul’s foriegn policy is wrong. How long will it take for the people who have been swayed by the Progressives to wake up to what is going on around them? Can’t you see what the establishment and media are doing? Romney was promised the nomination by the Croni’s, but they did not expect the people to start waking up. The country is run by the super rich and the FED. They do not want to return to the Constitutional principles that made our country great as it would diminish their control, their wealth, and their power over the people. The people are supposed to be in charge, but we are not in charge anymore. We need to get that power back. Ron Paul 2012.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 5:00pm@V Man
I’m with you bro! NEO-Con was actually used for Democrats by Democrats who supported Vietnam’s Intervention with the Progressive Republicans. Progressive Republicans and Progressive Democrats support Intervention. Not much has changed!!!
V for Victory!!!
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 5:58pmROMNEY2012
MAD_HATTER_
READRIGHTHERE
TOP_DOWN
These posters appear to be Romney staffers playing politics.
Report Post »Don’t bother with what they post; its just political sophistry.
These may even be the same person trying to appear to be a consensus.
donotdrinkthekoolade
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 6:04pmI used to chasten tea party supporters for dubbing Paul supporters as “Paulbots”. After months of reading blogs, I have come to the conclusion that they are correct. Supporters of Ron Paul despise any person with an opposing view and they all seem to repeat the same mantra as if they are part of some ‘Paul Borg’.
Report Post »Polwatcher
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 6:15pmPaul Ryan hurried to single out seniors for major benefit cuts as part of his budget cut proposal. He referred to Social Security and Medicare benefits as “entitlements”. Ryan did not cut the freeloaders in his budget cuts. Newt called Ryan on this and the establishment republicans climbed all over Newt.
With nearly 15% being deducted as FICA tax plus an extra amount for Medicare tax why does anyone refer to these benefits as “entitlements”? The problem with the budget is the freeloaders. If Newt will straighten this out, more power to Newt and screw the establishment Republicans.
Report Post »johnannegalt
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 6:17pmThis establishment stick is SO full of it. She needs to stop so desperately sucking up to the establishment kings and stand on her own two feet. http://markamerica.com/2011/12/13/flashback-romney-brags-hes-a-progressive/
Report Post »Viet Vet
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 6:18pmOne of the easiest predictions in the world to make, is that Ron Paul will never be president. There is a tremendous amount of wasted republican energy and political capital surrounding this kook.
Report Post »singleparent
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 6:22pmshe hangs with bill mahr or w/e the h ell his name is.. i sure as hell dont hang with socialist/progressives/marxist/commi’s………..
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 6:27pmDonotdrink, I used to be less harsh to people with opposing views, but after being called vile names, I started hitting back. We are in a war here, a revolution. War is never pretty even if the war is online. Paul supporters are more loyal than any other candidate and I see that as a positive. He will never be the flavor of the week with us. If you cannot see that true loyalty is a good thing then you are not a loyal person yourself. We say the same things just like Paul has been saying the same things for thirty years and he has been right on all of it. Do you call that a bad thing? I, for one, am looking for a candidate that does not flip flop all over the place and I would think everyone would have that same stance. Newt and Romney, Progressives, voting or signing anti-2nd amendment legislation! Flip flopping all over the place over the past decades. If you cannot see this, you have not been doing your own research. You are either going through life with blinders on your eyes and listening to the media or you are a Progressive. Which one is it?
Report Post »GQQSER
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 6:42pmI agree, Ron Paul is the best choice for this country at this time.
Report Post »DTaft5
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 6:44pmWell I have to disagree with ya’ll. Newt is only another Obama in white man skin. RP is too passive even if he does support the Constitution. He’s proven that time and time again. I wish Herman Cain were still in but since he’s not I would love to see The Donald back in the race. You may not like his personality and he may seem to confident for your liking but you have to give him the fact that he’s very smart, knows economics, will stand up for his values, takes no crap and will handle OPEC, China, Aclu like non others have. Then I’d like to see Bachmann as Vice President so she can learn get more confidence and learn how to speak up and stand her ground.then she could run again.
Report Post »walkyrie
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 6:47pmRick Perry is the only candidate (including Obama) who has successfully run a major international economy (Texas ranks ~15th worldwide) through a sustained growth cycle in the midst of worldwide economic downturns and US economic recession. He is also the only one who has a proven record of taking on the Feds in a big way, fighting the EPA and billing back the Feds for the cost of failed border control – he’ll slash the regulators in a big way (which is why the establishment is working so hard to paint him out of this campaign – to many snouts in the federal trough will get cut off). Perry is the real deal unlike the others who are either too kooky (Bachman and Paul), or too east-coast elitest progressives (Gingrich the Realpolitik Wilsonian and Romney).
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 7:13pmDtaft5, “The Donald?” Do you know the meaning of Cronicapitalism? Read up on it. Research people! You will never have a clue until you research everything. Learn what a Croni, Neocon Progressive principles are. Read the damn Constitution! Study the Bill of Rights. Learn what interventionism and nonintervention is. Actually look at all candidates records as far back as you can. Donald Trump is for Donald Trump. He will run as a third party if Paul is nominated because Paul will not give him special favors like other Presidents have in the past. I can tell you that the main reason he is against Obama is not from what Obama is doing to our country, but because Obama has never given him a call for anything and has not taken a call from him. Trump expressed his disdain about this to Greta VanSustren. People are so easy to put something over on. Quit being afraid of how hard it will be to get back to a truly free country. Suck it up and do it for your children. Once Individual Liberty is completely desimated, your lives are going to be in very bad shape and your children will be the ones who pay dearly for your blindness. Even Glenn said that we have to be willing to make the sacrifices for our children. Wake up!
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 7:26pmWalk, Perry? He does kinda sound like a “good ol boy” however, he is being told what to say, just like Obama and his teleprompters. He could not even remember the third department to cut in the debate. If he had a solid idea of what he was about, he would not forget important objectives like that. You could ask Paul and he would not hesitate as he has been true to his beliefs forever, and being a true believer in the Constitution helps. He is not a kook as you say, you just do not understand his policies, probably because you get all your news form the establishment. I bet you fall into the establishments lie about his foriegn policy don’t you? Take the time to view this video in it;s entirety or you will still not understand. Wake up!
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 7:41pmAnn Coulter is a sexy, sexy babe.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 7:46pmSorry, forgot to add the link. Thank Vechorik for this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPFQaLh-ycM
Report Post »Moosedrool
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 8:35pmI agree, Coulter makes me want to puke. I used to read her stuff, but ever since she started loving it up with gopac, she has totally lost me. She has turned into a totally disgusting rhino.
Report Post »t212112
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 8:36pmThis site has become rather disappointing; so much abdication of logic. Because some crazy Paul supporter with an affinity for exclamation points misinterprets my post, he and other “Paul-bots” (so disappointed that I have to use that term), regardless of clear indicators that I am conservative, calls me a “lefty.”
Brilliant, Ron Paul supporters. You act like Obama supporters that criticize their messiah.
Report Post »jnp
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:23pmI agree that Ron Paul would be a great conservative candidate EXCEPT for his foreign policy. unfortunately, his foreign policy would destroy the country about as fast as Obama is destroying it.
My choice would be Michelle Bachman. I feel that she and Ron Paul are both honest and conservative and she has the advantage of understanding International relations and has a realistic Foreign Policy.
Sure! The media would attack her as they did Sarah Palin! But that is only because both women are strongly conservative and would be GOOD for the country. The Liberal Press HATES anything that would be GOOD for America.
Which brings me to what would REALLY Tick off the Progressives, Liberals AND the Liberal Press: there are no political solutions to Spiritual problems. What we need to do FIRST of all is to turn back to God and realize that He gives us the government we deserve. As long as we hate God, He will continue to give us politicians who hate God. If we continue to support abominations that God hates such as homosexuality and abortion, He will allow us to have the leaders who will cause the “abortion” of this Nation.
Certainly we have to continue to discern the difference between good and evil and vote for the candidates who are “GOOD” people with godly character – we cannot continue to choose between the lesser of 2 evils.
Put God FIRST in your life and then vote for the candidate that reflects His character! Fight AGAINST evil in government! God will do the re
Report Post »ntxjetta
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:30pmRon Paul’s foreign policies will destroy this country as fast as the rest. There is no good choice for real Conservatives, sad but true.
Report Post »Anarcho Capitalist
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:44pmI’m voting for Ron Paul because he is the only American running.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:07pmVechorik,
That video was excellent. Thank you for posting it. The people who disparage Ron Pauls foreign policy probably have no clue about the history that is so well explained in the video. I challenge people to watch that video and reconsider what Paul says with a better understanding of why he says it.
Here it is again. Everyone please watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPFQaLh-ycM
Report Post »MistyBlueAngel
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:11pm@ BADDOGGY, if you are sold on Ron Paul, good for you. I for one think he’s got some good ideas, like legalizing drugs, because when it comes down to it, all we’re doing is empowering and enriching the foreign drug cartels. However, when it comes down to foreign policy, that’s where I have to draw the line. Someone said that he would’ve made a great President 100 years ago, because his isolationist policies would have been fine for then, but any one who lives in the real world knows that won’t work today. It’s NOT ok for Iran to go nuclear, but he seems to think it is. If it comes down to it, and by some miracle he gets the Republican nomination then I will hold my nose and vote for him anyway, just don’t count on it happening. Too many people think he’s too far out there. Libertarianism is a lot like communism; sounds great on paper, but doesn’t work in the real world.
Report Post »flntlok1949
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:15pmYou got that right for sure. I don‘t see how Paul’s Stand on foreign policy can be anything but conservative – and by the Constitution to boot!. I, to, don‘t totally agree with Paul’s foreign policy: But it would really worry me if he could wave a magic wand and make it all happen! He can’t because Congress, even a very Conservative Congress, won’t have it. There are some things we MUST do, in the name of common sense and our own safety – destroying a Nation so we can rebuild it in our own image ain’t one of them! Like all presidents, Paul would find out what is and isn’t, and what he can and can’t do, if he gets elected. There is a lot of top secret stuff he won’t know until his first day in the Oval Office – and some they’ll never tell him ( like what’s really going on with area 51). Seems like even the media folks we are supposed to trust to know what’s going on are trying to bend Conservatives towards the center. Electing a moderate who wants to “get along with the same – or is one of the same – people who created this mass would be worse for the Republican party than if Obummer is re-elected. Any “solutions” would likely pander to the Dem/Socialists agenda! And when they fail, who gets the blame! Not Saint Obama!
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:28pm@T212112
Awww, poor T212112, do you need a hug…Did T212112 get his feelings hurt by the truth…..
Logic tells those of us who USE it, if you support intervention, you are left of the Constitution, aka a “lefty”.
So, please explain to us how your statement Ron Paul’s foreign policy is “progressive” is true. How is holding Constitutional foreign policy a progression from the Constitution?
Total==============================================Anarchy
Gov ^
Constitution
^ ^
Intervention Non-Intervention
Notice you didn’t respond with facts but insults like “crazy”, “Paulbots”, and “lack of logic” which is a tactic of Progressives. Rut roe, truth is coming out….
Did you know OBAMA supports Intervention, like you? YOU and OBAMA hold the same policy. YOU and the LEFT administration have that policy in common, weird. Surely Obama isn’t a “conservative” too for holding Intervention foreign policy is he…….
You are a lefty if you support intervention. You can call yourself a ‘
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:40pm@T212112
You are a lefty if you support intervention. You can call yourself a ‘conservative’ or a tree I don’t care, you are still left of the Constitution.
To the rest questioning Ron Paul on foreign policy:
Obama supports Intervention, look at Libya and look at his administrations reasoning of “humanitarian” need to intervene as quoted by Powers that Glenn warned about would be used for intervening against Israel.
When Obama, a know progressive on the “left”, McCain, a known progressive on the “right”, and you hold the same foreign policy, you must ask yourself if you are holding a progressive foreign policy.
Intervention is progressive foreign policy began by Wilson. Before that time we held Non-Intervention. Wilson began the first World Government League of Nations now called the UN. It is all tied together thru Progressive foreign policy known as Intervention.
Wake up!
Report Post »demarvell
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:47pmI agree. Ron Paul may seem strange to some, but since all the other candidates, Conservative or Liberal, are REDUNDANT, we need somebody who will make a difference. A Repub is as the same as a Demo. All are false representatives of the people. Paul is the only one who comes close to doing what the people want and not what the lobbyists want. Republicans and Democrats are always the same, so it just seems that Ron Paul is strange. Actually he is just different than the status quo.
Report Post »Ogotstogo
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 12:56amCoulter is just another establishment conservative…Ron Paul is the only candidate who is really electable that will fight to this countries ills
http://www.reveresride.net/2011/12/14/the-time-may-truly-be-now-for-a-viable-3rd-party-president-and-only-ron-paul-could-pull-it-off/
Report Post »SoulReaver
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 1:13amnot another Ron Paulian….. this man has 1 good idea smaller government but he goes Waaaaaaaaay to far. If he gets in practice up on your chinese because he is far to weak on foreign policy. That is one of 2 areas we need the pres to be strong.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 5:29amAfter reading the last few posts, I can truly say that these people are not doing anyone any favors. Do not listen to these Progressive trolls that tell you to vote for the Republican, no matter who he is because BO will get another four years! Poppycock! I have been following all the polls, have you? What they tell me is Paul is the actual frontreunner, but the media will not tell you so. Even a Fox News poll that I was following utnil they pulled it off had Paul winning by a huge margin, and the next day they tried to be a little bit more sly by having the choices only Romney, Gingrich, Obama and Other. Other won with over 85%!!! I am sure they will take that one down soon and I also guess that the 85% were mostly Paul supporters. Do not say the polls were skewed as that would be lame. The polls that are skewed are the media polls. I worked in polls and can tell you, it is all how you ask the question. Online polls are way more honest.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:13amProgressives = Nihilistic Manifest Destiny Sociopaths.
Report Post »Who would Jesus bomb?
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 11:15amYeah what the heck is her big problem with Ron Paul? She thinks Romney is “more conservative”? I like reading her columns but she has lost a ton of credibility with me. She needs to get back to what she does best which is bashing ******** who deeply deserve it, pointing out their lies and hypocrisy. The best thing Romney has going for him is he can beat Obama, and that’s important, but that’s about all… the guy’s a RINO. I am afraid whoever we elect will just be more of the same unless it‘s Ron Paul or hell I’d take Bachmann over most of these other turds.
Report Post »George Patton
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 11:54am@oakie
ok now you are criticizing t12 because you say he isn’t using logic. So let me point out the gaping flaws in your logic.
Your claim is that obama is a progressive and supports intervention. Now here is what your funny logic does with that claim—–> Obama is a progressive and supports intervention, therefore anyone who supports intervention is a progressive. I’m sure to you this sounds logical but it is not. If we plug different words into that sentence you will see it is an illogical formula.
Here watch—> Obama is a progressive and supports the right of women to vote therefore anyone who supports the right of women to vote is a progressive. Or this one: Hitler was a nazi and liked dogs, therefore anyone who likes dogs is a nazi.
You can hold the belief that an intervention policy is wrong or even progressive, but your argument that it is progressive simply because you claim obama supports it is not a logical conclusion. Find another argument why it is a progressive stance.
Hitler was a nazi and liked dogs, therefore anyone who likes dogs is a nazi. That’s dumb logic. Actually its the logic the left uses. I guess you area lefty…hahaha
Report Post »lovinight
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 12:07pmGod I hope he wins, if we get another puppet in the house, this country is finished!
Report Post »George Patton
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 12:07pmBy the way, the irony of my last sentence was intentional.
Report Post »DrFrost
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 12:33pmRon Paul is one of the most conservative picks. His foreign policy is, IMO, wrong and naive but you certainly can’t characterize it as liberal. In general I‘ve liked what I’ve heard Coulter say but she’s lost some points with this statement.
Report Post »book-fellow
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 12:34pmThat’s funny! Ron Paul not conservative? Ha! Another author that doesn’t write her own books. Look the word up in the dictionary please.
Report Post »DesertDave54
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 1:39pmdrop the crackpipe! DO YOU ACTUALLY THINK THAT REAL CONSERVATIVES WILL VOTE FOR SOMEONE WHO WANTS TO LEGALIZE HEROIN? REALLY? Business owners like myself- scary globalists!!!- do not want someone who is nothing short of an isolationist. Oh, and independents won’t vote for Paul, either. You’re probably one of the Paul fanatics that threw objects at Hannity- you only believe in your “liberty” and “free speech” when it applies to the Ron Paul blather- anybody else who says ANYTHING remotely critical is shouted down… or stoned. No, not stoned like Paul followers are.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 5:11pmDesertdave, You see, you are not doing your homework, but just listening to the establishment. When you do this, your post becomes a lie. Are you a liar, or just uninformed and posting other’s lies? Paul has never said he wants to legalize heroin. Where do you people get these things. He is for limited Federal government as the Constitution requires for the people to be free and in charge. The power goes to each individual state to make the laws according to what the people who live in that state want. If your fear comes true and the state you live in legalizes heroin because the people of your state want that (doubt that would happen), then you could vote with your feet and move to a state that keeps it illegal. What a concept, freedom of the people. We have been away from this form of government for so long, people seem to forget this creates Individual Liberty. Wake up man!
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 5:38pmThe word conservative is quickly losing its meaning. Everyone is going around saying, “my candidate is conservative, yours is not conservative.“ Now we have a contest to see who can spew the most ”conservative” talking points. Even in this thread, there are people bickering with each other about what conservative “really” means. Give me a break. If you think everyone is a RINO, then you’re just trying to hijack the word Republican.
Has anyone stopped to think that maybe strict partisanship is not what we need right now? The country has become bitterly divided, and yet everyone seems to believe that we need the candidate who will offend the most people on the other side.
George Washington warned against partisanship as he left office. He gave a speech in which he essentially predicted the exact situation we find ourselves in now. I suggest everyone look it up and take it to heart.
The nation is on fire, and throwing a bucket of kerosene on it won’t put it out.
Report Post »joe conservative
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 5:40pmI actually have to agree with you. Ann seems to be very inconsistent lately. I hate when conservatives talk about fairness. This great youtube video shows how the “fairness” game is something liberals have mastered. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdTJR_OYnNg
Report Post »RodentKing
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:49amWhen you think of Real Trailer Trash, Coulter fits the bill.
Report Post »AZindependent
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:54amI could see her in a guest appearance on Trailer Park Boys. Maybe as J Rock’s uptight, neocon sister?
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:03amI wouldn’t say she is “Trash.” But I will say she is as much Conservative based upon her participating also aligning herself with Conservatives as much as an Atheist is a Christian because they send out Christmas Cards.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:07amYou know, i think Ron Paul is a complete nut job, and that may be exactly what we need !!!
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:08amAnd what I mean by that is that she and they want to reap where they haven’t sown, but only the Lord Almighty is truly allowed to do that.
Report Post »Zoe
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:19amBut, some of like our women a little on the trashy side?
& @ Nut Job – I’m throwing up all over Ron Paul………. but who will save the constitution argument gets you thinking
Go http://RickSantorum.com
Report Post »spankadonkey
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:29amI think she is wrong about Paul. Most of his ideas are conservative but my problem with him is that for all his talk, he has never accomplished anything SIGNIFICANT. And VECHORIK, I’ll bet you any amount you are willing to wager that Paul will not win Iowa (or any other state for that matter) regardless of your lies about him leading in the polls.
Report Post »sweathog1948
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:36amexplaine.
Report Post »Johnny Cocheroo
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:39amShe’s not trailer trash.
She’s a conservative woman who is unafraid to express her views, even if its against the grain. I like women like her…. that’s why I married one ;-)
I may not always agree with her but I enjoy her conversations & arguments. She went on Joy Behar’s show about a month ago (I stumbled across it channel surfing.. honestly). She destroyed Behar’s arguments – it was fantastic.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:50amI dont know, but Ron Paul is pledging to cut the budget by one trillion the first year, that sounds pretty conservative to me… And it must have Democrats and Rinos, crapping in their Depends…. Im not a Paulie by any stretch, but im comin around, as far as foriegn policy, i say write us a check and we protect you, otherwise bring em home, we are kinda broke at the moment…. So just like a family budget, we cant afford all that we once did……
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:52amDETROIT Paul wants to end the Federal Reserve…every President who has tried to do that has failed or was assassinated..(Kennedy) or had an attempt on their life…also it would take an act of Congress to go along with him on the things that he wants to do..Can this country handle freedom and the Peter Schiffe Austrian Economics? Could she stand “being in good standing again.. and on the road back to the greatest country in the world.?..Paul stands for all the things that made this country a desirable place to live.. Maybe people enjoy enslavement and an impoverished nation. looking up to kings with all the money..
Report Post »Mtroom
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:32am“White trash beautiful, There‘s somethin’ you should know, My heart belongs to you..You.coulda found a better guy, I’ll love ya til the day I die, Swear to god it’s true…Comein’ home to you…” Everlast (White Trash Beautiful)
Some like trash
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:35amcocheroo,
Report Post »She’s so conservative that she was supporting Hillary(who was running on the same platform as Obama) and then switched to McCain when Hillary lost the nomination. She’s trash hypocritical illogical unadulterated trash.
A Conservatarian
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 2:37pmNewt wants the constitution to die
http://www.thestreet.com/story/11342257/1/ron-paul-newt-gingrich-wants-the-constitution-to-die.html?obref=obinsite
Report Post »jonnydoe
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 3:53pm@ZOE – “But, some of like our women a little on the trashy side?”
@JOHNNY COCHEROO – “I like women like her…. that’s why I married one”
You guys do realize (m)Ann is a guy in drag, right? Holy cow, just look at the adam’s apple. Waking up next to her would be like Woltz’s scene from the Godfather (neigh).
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 6:46pmThey say you can tell someone’s real character by how they act when no one is watching (or listening). Well, as luck would have it, I am a listener of Peter Schiff’s fledgling radio show, which doesn’t have very many listeners. If you know Mr. Schiff, you’d know he likes to argue his points, not disrespectfully, but passionately. Ms. Coulter came on his show for an interview and he mentioned her book at least a couple times, but anytime he tried to have a discussion with her or debate her, she was extremely rude and sarcastic and only wanted to talk about her book, nothing else. She also did the same thing to Jason Lewis, a more well known radio host (who sometimes fills in for Rush Limbaugh). I’ve lost all respect for her because the Coulter you see on highly rated shows like Hannity is not the real Anne Coulter. She’s a very rude, detestable individual, and not just to liberals, to conservatives, too. The same applies to Dick Morris as well, who also appeared briefly on Peter Schiff’s radio show. It was all about his book and no respect for the host or the listeners. It‘s also a side of him you don’t see on Fox or on Hannity’s radio show.
Report Post »jonnydoe
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 12:04am@DRSAVAGE24,
That‘s why they like going on Hannity’s show. He’s as worthless as they are.
Report Post »RetiredSF
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:49amCoulter is just another elitist. She supports Cristy who supports mandates and more gun laws. I sure hope enough people wake up from the republican establishment’s idea of conservatism, before it is too late. Just what is that are trying to conserve? There is only one candidate who is going to actually shrink the government and stop policing the world. That is why elitists like her hate Paul. He will actully defend the constitution and that my friends is last thing the republican establishment and its talking heads want. Remember that Coulter thinks we should invade other counties, kill their leaders and use force to convert them to christianiy. That is the role of government in her eyes. Is this what “conservative” means to the republican establishment?
Report Post »escape_from_socialism
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:28amAnd this is why people are so pissed off.
Report Post »Thanks GOD people are starting to see thru those fake conservatives, who are just painted old turds progressives.
Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:05am@ASHES
Report Post »like I said, im comin around…..
THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:19pm@ DETROIT PAPERBOY
Watch this my fellow American this will shine the light of truth on ann coulter newt AND who they really are! After seeing this you WILL KNOW for yourself why Only Dr Ron Paul can help us WITH HIS FOREIN POLICY …This is what the mainstream media is hiding from you!
http://vimeo.com/6445068
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:08pm@The Truth Shall Make You Free……Very good video.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:28pmThe Truth Shall Make You Free,
Thank you for posting that outstanding video.
If Newts supporters would take a half hour to watch that video, they would either thank you profusely for leading them to information that saves them from unknowingly voting for a dishonest, power-hungry, world-government progressive, or that is secretly exactly want they really want in a candidate.
To anyone who is planning on voting for Gingrich, please watch this 33 minute, very informative video.
http://vimeo.com/6445068
Report Post »stickandtwig.com
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:48amWith a few significant exceptions, Ron Paul’s book, “Defining Liberty,” could have come straight from the quill of Thomas Jefferson. When Coulter RIGHTLY points out Paul is not “conservative,“ she draws attention to how far we who have called ourselves ”conservative” have strayed from the original ideals and principles of our founding fathers.
Learn the original argument – the real original argument – at http://www.stickandtwig.com
Report Post »TeaParty_RonPaul_R3VOLUTION
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:08pmRon Paul is the constitutionalist conservative.
Ann Coulter… give me a break.
Ron Paul has always worked to reduce the size of government.
Report Post »stickandtwig.com
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 2:23pmTeaParty_RonPaul_R3VOLUTION,
We understand your intentions, and we do not wish to sound as though we are attacking you in any way. On the contrary, we applaud the allegiance to the Constitution. However, we would caution you against the us of the term “conservative” in describing Rep. Paul. He is much more closely identified with the modern Libertarian/Classic Liberal ideology than with the modern American conservative. As difficult as it may be for many to hear this, and harder still to accept, “conservative” does not equal “founding fathers.” This is why we started http://www.stickandtwig.com, and why we hope you will take the time to check us out.
For the record, we understand and agree with nearly everything Rep. Paul believes, even his position on defense – IN PRINCIPLE. Unfortunately, the genie is out of the bottle when it comes to the Middle East, and no matter how badly we wish it were otherwise, no one will be able to put that smoke back in the bottle. In our humble opinion, Rep. Paul’s fundamental weakness is in his understanding of the foundational cause of the conflict in this region of the world, and the global ramifications it presents. Still, in answer to those in the Republican Party arguing “anybody but Obama,” at least Ron Paul would leave us with our freedom, the same cannot be said should we elect a Progressive Republican. We wish The Patriot Act and TARP had shown this to be true to our conservative/Republican friends.
Report Post »mcFirst
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:48amI usually like Ann but linking Ron and Newt is just now an option.
She is trying to discredit Ron thru Newt.
Fox someone can take any story and spin it to be about Newt and Romney. Greta headlined with a story last night how Ron was basically tied with Newt. The body of the story then became about Newt and Romney, not a meniton why people are flocking to Ron Paul.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:57amFox has constantly said “Ron Paul can’t win” When Dr. Paul wins Iowa and comes in at least 2nd in NH — how will they explain that? It’s hard to watch Fox these days, although when O’Reilly comes on, I switch the channel to Fox BUSINESS news and watch “Freedom Watch” with Judge Andrew Napolitano. THAT‘s where you’ll see what Washington is really up to and how they shred the Constitution each day. Fox also allows Judge Napolitano to tell the truth about Dr. Paul (which Fox won’t allow on regular Fox News — with more viewers).
Report Post »Rightallalong
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:46amAnn has lost it and is confused between liberal and Libertarian.
And if you think Paul is weak on foreign policy then please watch this and if you still think so fair enough
Understand Blowback, which the CIA believes is what is at the root of the terrorist activity against the US. Security and CIA analyst tend to agree that our actions result in reactions in the form of Blowback. Long but very profound video …
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=I8NhRPo0WAo#
escape_from_socialism
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:58amAnn – still hard to woke up to the fact, we have progressives in GOP? And Newt and Romney both are progressives in their own words.
Report Post »AB5r
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:59amThe biggest fools in the West today are the fools, knuckle dragging, slobbering, muttering hopeless fools, and that includes people in our Government, Armed Forces, and Intelligence Agencies, who think that the problem with Islam has ANYTHING AT ALL to do with anything “we” have done either to, for or with Muslims or lands already subjugated by Islam. These knuckle dragging, slobbering, muttering hopeless fools are NO BETTER than, they are just as pathetic as, the abused spouse who blames herself after being hit, after all she knew he didn’t like his steak burnt. It is truly tragic to see our supposedly proud military reduced to dhimmi status groveling and scraping at the feet of Muslims trying to get them to “like” us. The West is already lost, all hope is gone. Sure, leave the Muslims alone, AND AT THE SAME TIME LET THEM INFILTRATE OUR OWN LANDS IN THE MILLIONS, unbelievable.
Report Post »BoomSlander
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:21am@AB5R it is hilarious that you are that terrified of Muslims. They are winnig against you and you don’t even know it. But hey, fear creates power.
Report Post »AB5r
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:40ambumslander, Any non-Muslim who does not “fear” Islam is no different than the person who walks into the polar bear cage at the zoo thinking that they are just cuddly and cute animals. Either that or you are just ignorant of the truth about Islam, in other words, it is impossible for a sane non-Muslim to know the truth about Islam and not hate it, or “fear” it, not out of cowardice but out of the normal desire of the normal sane human or animal even, to “survive.” What is more interesting, what needs to be studied by clinical psychiatrists, is how people like you, and liberals in the West, have managed to brainwash out of the modern liberal the ages old normal human reaction of the “survival instinct.” Liberals so turn reality on it’s head that even the survival of their own civilization, their own society, doesn’t register the slightest blip in their survival instinct.
Report Post »Churchill
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:15pmAB5R
I’m surprised you managed to muster up the courage to crawl out from under your bed, what with all those big bad muslims everywhere. I’m no fan of islam, but it‘s strange how some ’conservatives’ are so scared. Man up, stop acting like bed wetting liberals. Our biggest threat is the debt and socialism.
Report Post »AB5r
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:29pmThese liberal twits are absurd the way they accuse people of being “afraid” of homos, “afraid” of Muslims, “afraid” of whatever it is that liberals don’t have a real answer to the concerns people raise about some issue. The people who are afraid are the liberals who refuse to face reality, refuse to learn the truth about things, and instead choose to remain in their childlike world of make-believe where everyone can just get along. These twits need to go to countries controlled by Islam and preach that crap, they wouldn’t get out alive.
Report Post »George Patton
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 3:38pm@ab5r you are right. I am so tired of the liberals and Paulbots saying that the muslims are “winning against you” because you are “afraid” of them. That is stupid on every level. Acknowledging the existence of a threat, does not mean you are “afraid” of it. What if paulbots applied this twisted logic to other things, like tornadoes…”if you are afraid of tornadoes they are winning against you.”
The paulbots logic when it is stripped of its rhetoric is simply this: “Fear is a means of control, so if we don’t fear things we will never be controlled.” The logic is sound up to that point. Then it goes off the rails with its conclusions: Don’t acknowledge any threats that may exist because that can cause fear, and thus lead to being controlled. So following that logic, tornadoes, polar bears, snake bites, poison, and islam’s world conquest can only harm us if we acknowledge them.”
No matter how much you deny the threat of snake bite poisoning, it will still kill you
No matter how much you deny the ambition of world conquest by islam it will still seek to conquer you.
Neither paulbots or conservatives fear islam.
We don’t fear it. We acknowledge that it exists. Then decide to defeat it.
You don’t fear it either, because you deny it exists.
Well I have news for you paulbots….snake bites and islam can harm you. Acknowledging that a threat exists does not mean you fear it…and it does not mean you risk being controlled by fear.
Report Post »George Patton
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 3:54pmAlso, things that can harm us are most likely going to be scary and cause fear. The solution to dangerous or harmful things is not to remove the fear of it…..the danger still exist regardless of our emotional response to it. The solution is to eliminate or minimize the danger. Islam seeks world conquest. Period. What are we going to do about it? Denying Islam‘s ambitions does not mean they can’t harm us.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:44amYeah, Ann is not part of my consideration for anything. Used to be, but she’s not the brain she seemed to be a few years ago.
Report Post »Oh, God!
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:15amSame here Tron, but I also think I have become a lot more conservative over this last year. You listen to her and Ingraham, and they both are drooling over Romney. He is not conservative, said so this past week. The only ones calling out his past are Rush and Levin. Don;t like Romney, never have, just another smooth talker full of BS.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:59amAgreed; Levin and Rush are the only ones left.
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:44amLOL – Coulter believes (she doesn’t really believe this of course) that Romney and Bachmann are equally conservative and the only conservatives left in the race?
It is amazing that anyone can discuss “conservatives” in the current race and not discuss the only TRUE CONSERVATIVE in the race, Rick Santorum. Coulter, and all fake conservatives (along with their liberal buddies) fear real conservatives.
Report Post »Rightallalong
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:53amI like Santorum until he tried to say that the current conflict with Iraqn started with the taking of the US hostages. He seemed to either be ignorant of or forgetful of (both are very bad) of the US overthrow of Mossadeq – something that anyone as President BETTER understand
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB28/
Report Post »OhSuzieQ
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:08amTri-Ox, I pray Rick Santorum wins! He is the best MAN to turn America back to OUR America!
Report Post »Babysan12
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:43amAll this from a skank who thought the Canadians fought in Vietnam. Who cares?
Eliasim
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:50amThe Canadians enjoy the benefits from being neighbors with the U.S, but when the U.S fades away the Canadians will then be forced to constantly defend themselves as will even the Amish who dwell in security in the U.S.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:54amHeck, the only reason Canada ever stopped attacking the U.S is because Europe’s Royals stopped pushing them to because after the U.S kissed their rears in the Middle 1800′s that old serpent killed the U.S slowly with their Progressive ways.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:55amOh but now are they ever going to pay the piper.
Report Post »RightThinking1
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:03amReally? Perhaps the families of these men would disagree with you :
Report Post »http://www.glanmore.org/cdncas/memorialair.html
Perhaps ‘Canada’ wasn’t engaged in combat, but certainly Canadians were…
honor007
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:42amI want Herman Cain back. The rest suck; especially RP. He is a danger to our Country. Not only because of his foreign policy, however, because of his supporters. I have followed them in the past 6 months and have paid close attention. The reason he is ahead in the polls is he has gained traction from “occupy movement”, Obama supporters who will vote for him in the primary and if he does not win, will vote for Obama. Very, very dangerous.
Report Post »AZindependent
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:52amPeace, friendship and freedom are really scary concepts when you have been brainwashed to be scared little sheeple fearing the latest big, bad wolf.
Report Post »MEDICINE TO THE DEAD
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:04amI used to think the same thing about Pauls foreign policy stance but it is blatantly obvious to me now that foreign policy is not the biggest issue in this election. It’s the economy and jobs and exponential growth of US debt. And my friend, Paul knocks those issues out of the park and that is a fact. The foreign policy issue is not as big as a threat to our lives as the dollar crashing which is inevitable if we stay on the current path. Plus Romney and Newt are just like Bush and McCain. If you can’t see that they are all the same type of people something is wrong with you. I don’t want to get someone in the white house that is just a little less of a socialist than Obama. If that happens, in 4 years there will be another Marxist democrat running the country.
Report Post »TeaParty_RonPaul_R3VOLUTION
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:11pm“It is dangerous to be right when you’re government is wrong”
Report Post »RetiredSF
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 5:23pmRon Paul is the only republican who has a chance of getting former Obama voters. Not one person who voted for Obama is going to vote for Newt, Mitt, Bachman or any other neo-conservative. They may stay home, but they will not come out and vote for these liars. They will however vote for Paul. So maybe the question is, Paul or Obama. No more voting for the lesser of evils.
Report Post »wewantchillywilly
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:42amHannity really needs to separate himself from all these progressives, but that’s all he has on his show it seems. well, some of them are conservative, but they won’t support cutting military spending. that’s not conservatism.
he is way too buddy-buddy with the candidates, especially Newt.
Report Post »dsm
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:40amI have come to the conclusion that Hannity is not a conservative. He is a republican. He tries to sell himself as a conservative. Hannity needs to be liked by everbody. He has no real convictions. This makes it possible for him to stand wherever he wants to at a particular time. He is a conservative fraud.
Only a true conservative can save our country. Bachman or Santorum.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:28pmI listened to hennity for about 2 years when he first started his national show, i began realizing that he cares more about the r then he does about our country, as i began to listen more i realized that the talking heads on the right are just as dishonest as the ones on the left, i than realized he was not a conservative or a Constitutionalist..he is a cheerleader for the same establishment progressive rinos that hate us tea partiers for daring to vote for our freedoms than one of their chosen progressives
Report Post »Harry Assenback
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:41amMr Axelrod………….When you climb a pole…….I can clearly see your nuts………….
Report Post »atechgeek
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:46amHa ha ha ha .. now that’s funny .. i don’t care who you are !!
Report Post »guntotinsquaw
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:40amNow that I have quit choking on my coffee…you have given me an image that will scar me for life!!
TEA2012
Report Post »One If By Land
GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:33amHe has nuts?
Who knew?
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 5:43pmAmericanfirst, Really? Conservative? I do not know one conservative that agrees in any anti-2nd amendment legislation like Romney signed into law in MA! Gingrich voted for two anti-amendment bills in Congress. Paul actually put up a bill to get us back to the 2nd amendment the way it was intended but was fought by Progressives as they truly want to disarm the people. Get real.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:41amIt’s puzzles me how ANYONE could support Romney and Bachmann.
That‘s like saying I’m a member of a church that supports satan.
Jeeesh!
Romney is NOT a Republican. He’s a PROGRESSIVE Republican
Bachmann is a more-conservative Republican that has made a few mistakes, but at least she’s conservative.
Ron Paul helped Bachmann get elected and he was disappointed in her support of the antiPatriot Act that led to the “indefinite detention” bill.
Bachmann and Beck seems to agree on what’s best for Israel and consider Ron Paul outside that loop, but for the life of me I can’t figure out why — specifically?
Ron Paul stands with Israel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7d5XeeYrrA
“Ron Paul furious over indefinite detention act” http://rt.com/usa/news/defense-ron-paul-detention-745/
Report Post »atechgeek
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:43amRon Paul will balance the scale in Washinton. We need someone way right to offset what the Osama administration has done. Abolish the Fed, Flat Tax, so long Fannie and Freddie, repeal Osama-care.
Report Post »Then we will be on the road to being a great nation once again.
escape_from_socialism
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:49amDid anybody wonder, why Israels wars last few weeks the most? Because, the have outlined mission.
Report Post »The follow our founding fathers idea. Quick strike. I US will stop aiding Israels enemies. Israel will be much safer.
Twinspeedr
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:50amCoulter just needs to endorse Romney and get it over with. Her thinly veiled fawning over him is sad and very obvious. Worse is casting Ron Paul as less conservative than any other candidate besides maybe Bachmann or Santorum is completely ludicrous. She is just another starstruck politico that is CLUELESS about what this country really needs for long term prosperity.
Principles over politics 2012.
Report Post »americanfirst
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:06amI am voting for Mitt Romney as the most conservative GOP candidate in the field!
Report Post »Mitt Romney 2012!
A Conservatarian
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:57pmlol Romney the most conservative in the field left, that’s a hoot
Report Post »BV
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:40amSo Coulter doesn’t like the big government guy or the only true small government guy?
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:35amExactly
Report Post »Holland
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:39amBook sells must be down. I mean, if Mittster is the most conservative candidate now….I’m Queen Lizzy…..he was for gay right, abortion…..most social ills of the day….and since his run this time…I’ve NEVER heard Romney news ask him….I‘ve only hear them say he was ’all conservative, all the time’…..sorry…I don’t trust FoxinthehenhouseNews any more. They are FOR most social ills of the day as well.
Hope Ann got a good check before her rant.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:44amMurdock (the one who owns Fox) also owns the publishing house that produces Newt’s book. Murdock is part of the banking/military machine for constant war. That explains a lot that goes on around Fox.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:53am..forgot to add. Early in the election process, Fox constantly warned viewers “you can’t go too conservative” — constantly pushed Romney — constantly warned the Tea Party that they couldn’t elect their “ideal candidate.” Made me sick to hear.
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:59amRomney is no big government progressive. Romney is a capitalist who spent decades developing companies in the private sector for profit. Yeah this is the type of guy that would want more big government regulations to strangle corporate growth in the private sector-NOT!
Romney’s only negative was the fact that he was governor of the most liberal state for only 4 years. MA was going to pas universal healthcare regardless who was governor…there legislature was 87% liberal democrats.
Gingrich on the other hand has spent 40 plus years as a corrupt Washington insider and politician and who has profited from the Big Government model. Besides the fact that he lied to Congress and his multiple wives and mistresses, I don’t know how anyone who considers themselves to be a tea party conservative could vote for this turkey.
The GOP deserves to lose if this is their nominee..they have no one to blame but themselves.
Report Post »Holland
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:08amRon Paul is an idiot. So, please don’t think I support this lying baboon.
Report Post »Holland
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:14amEducate yourself SLR….stop watching Romney news, and working for the airhead GOP leadership….do a little research….hear ROMNEYs OWN WORDS….Fox, Murdoch….will not allow you to hear them on their Romney channel. He is a bigger flip flopper than Kerry….and I don’t trust him. The democrats have spent hundreds of years teaching the slaves how to ignore facts and stay happy on the plantation….and the republicans have worked hard to turn Christian conservatives into their own brand of slaves….I AM NOT A SLAVE to anyone but God.
I have NEVER heard Romney pretend to be anything but a social liberal and ‘protect his money’ conservative…..I do NOT want that for my leader
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:47pmHolland
Romney‘s actions and his success’s speak volumes in that he is a conservative and a capitalist. All of his business and budget decisions have been fiscally conservative, with the exception of MA care…which was touted as conservative back in 2007 by Heritage.
I take it you are one of these people who watch deceptive Romney videos which take his comments out of context or cut off major portions of his message.
Report Post »smackdown33
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:38amCoulter is losing her conservative bona fides, as are Hannity, O’Reilly… . She is a big fan of Christie who, though conservative by east coast standards, is no conservative. There is no question that the most Constitutionally sound candidate is Ron Paul. Problem is, the neocon can not operate within the Constitution. She is a neocon.
Report Post »AZindependent
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:44amWell said. The Neocons can’t stand the idea of freedom, they are all about control. The chance that Paul will take Iowa has them looking for their Depends every morning.
Report Post »indy1
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:51amBy neocons you man The JOOOOOOOOOOS??????????
Report Post »Churchill
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:44amThat, and the fact the neocons are absolutely terrified of Iran for some reason. They think if we don‘t start bombing them they’ll kill us all. The neocons need to man up.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:38amI new Newt was forked the very first time I saw smoke come from his lips. Why did he have to seal people’s opinion before skeptics opened their mouth? Once someone gets the lead you are less believable, because people will think your attacks come from jealousy. Of course it’s a rhetorical question, as I know God wills it.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:37amThis will send the Paul people right over the edge .. they have been teetering on.
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 11:08amNaa…We aren’t teetering on the edge…We’ve been steady in our support for Rep.Paul….because Paul has been so steady in support of the Constitution and preserving our liberty.
Report Post »HarmonyCorruption
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:26pmLOL! Because we care what Coulter thinks?
Report Post »rush_is_right
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:37amshe’s sold out…a while ago…her fav is crispie creme christy…another rino….
Report Post »AOL_REFUGEE
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:36amReally? Are we talking about the same two candidates here? And how does Coulter account for/excuse Romney for all his flip-flopping, not to mention RomneyCare?
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:36amFacts Ann, no facts to support your statement make it just another opinion.
Report Post »sonnetswan
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:36amI’m voting for the only Constitutionalist, Ron Paul.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:40amWhat the he77 did Coulter says Ron Paul is Ultra-Conservative almost to the point of libertarian call him least conservative shows how truely ignorant she is. Now Gingrich is claiming to have move right in his political ideology But Paul has always been right since his first day .
Report Post »jginmt
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:56amBachmann and Santorum are constitutionlist. Ron Paul is a wacko on to many issues. Only person worst is Hunsman. There is no possible way Ron Paul will win the Republican nomination. Your Ron Paul trolls just give it up.
Report Post »Johnny Cocheroo
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:18am@JGINMT
Why the name calling? It doesn’t persuade and only makes opinions stronger.
You should have listened more to my grandmother…. you get more flies with honey instead of vinegar.
Paul makes excellent sense in the economic realm but I disagree with his international policies. The way I see it is this: Ron Paul will ensure we have economic stability with some international problems – A Rino will ensure that we have no economic stability and thus have ZERO international influence.
I can live with Bachmann, Paul & Santorum – given a choice or RINO, I might just pull the lever for Obama.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:43amPaul makes excellent sense in the economic realm but I disagree with his international policies
I felt that same way but the more I thought about the more I realized that I do agree with Paul on most international issue. In that I think we should get out of the league of nations,end the internation money cartel know as the Federal serve,and mind our own business. WE SHOULDN’T POLICE THE WORLD ESPECIALLY AT THE COST OF THE U.S. TAX PAYER.
Report Post »sonnetswan
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:45amDo any of you so-called conservatives believe in the Constitution or not? Have you read the constitution regarding foreign affairs? Oh yes, you just stand by the Constitution when it conveniently agrees with you and your pied piper.
Report Post »Churchill
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:33pmMore and more people are waking upto Ron Paul. The more people find out about the likes of Newt, Perry, Romney etc. the less they like them. The more people find out about Ron Paul the more they like him. He gets more money from military personnel than all the other candidates combined!!! So much for a wacky foreign policy!!!
Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:34amWho flips most? Gringrich or Romney? Hard to decide:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=yHsbkA_19c4
Newt Gingrich: Selling Access
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=hRdqGKA782A
heavyduty
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:33amMitt is a PROGRESSIVE so that leaves him out. So she must be one also.
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:08amMitt is no progressive…he is a capitalist! Who made 100s of millions in the private sector developing companies. The last thing a capitalist wants is more government regulations to strangle job growth in the private sector.
He was only a governor for 4 years of the most liberal state in the country. MA would have passed Universal healthcare regardless of who was governor since the MA legislature was 87% liberal democrats.
Report Post »Spyder
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 12:45pm@SLR4528
Report Post »One thing you don’t realize it that Romney WAS a capitalist and made lots of money. But now he wants control instead of money. He has moved away from capitalism and switched gears to become a middle of the road Progressive, which allows him to flip-flop on issues depending on what is the flavor of the crowd to whom is is speaking to at the time. Just because he used to be in business does not guarantee that he will be business friendly. He’ll be business friendly to the people that will give him power to wield.
He is another Obama; who is another Bush; who is another Clinton, etc… Middle of the road person who will say anything he needs to assume more power.
slr4528
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:53pmSPYDER-So you can predict Romney’s future actions…do you need to where your metal hat to do that?
I based my conclusions from concrete actions and evidence. Romney has changed his position but no more than any other politician. Gingrich has been flip floppin down to an art form.
The most consistent candidates have been Paul and Bachman.
My reason for liking Romney is because he has been successful in the private sector and understands the private sector and the economy. Since the major issue is the economy and jobs and not “debates” then Romney’s the guy.
Report Post »xRedfoxx
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 2:51pmRomney believes in ‘holy’ underwear and that he can one day become a god.
Spyder
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 3:00pmSo you can predict and I can’t… Whatever. You just shot your own foot with your own argument. Hypocrite!
SAGE
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:32amAnn… lost me… when she fell in “love” with the PROGRESSIVE Chris Christie.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:42amYep — that also explains her supporting Romney — she’s a PROGRESSIVE Republican — almost a Democrat, yet she makes a living bashing Democrats!
Report Post »Rightallalong
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 9:44amagree 100% – Ann has completely lost her mind and is confused with being progressive liberal and Libertarian.
All of you that think Ron’s foreign policy is weak – take a look and give it a rethink. If you still believe he is weak fair enough …
Understand Blowback, which the CIA believes is what is at the root of the terrorist activity against the US. Security and CIA analyst tend to agree that our actions result in reactions in the form of Blowback. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=I8NhRPo0WAo#
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 2:40pmMore video homework!
Newt wants the constitution to die
http://www.thestreet.com/story/11342257/1/ron-paul-newt-gingrich-wants-the-constitution-to-die.html?obref=obinsite
Report Post »