Media

Ann Coulter on Wall St. Protest: This is What ‘The Beginning of Totalitarianism’ Looks Like

I guess you could imagine a chant with Ann Coulter going something like this:

Show me what totalitarianism looks like!

This is what totalitarianism looks like!

That’s because the fiery conservative commentator had a theory on the Wall St. protesters. According to her, the kind of anti-capitalism rhetoric coming from the participants mirrors the beginning of “totalitarianism.”

“All of those quotes could have been said in 1789 in France before the French Revolution, or the Russian Revolution, or with only slight modifications when the Nazis were coming to power, in Cuba under Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez in Venezuela,” she told Fox host Eric Bolling. “This is always the beginning of totalitarianism.”

When Bolling asked if the comments could also be heard in an Obama cabinet meeting, Coulter agreed, pointing out that Democrats “love mob uprisings” because “it’s their path to power.”

You can watch her comments below, which also include some thoughts on Michael Moore and his claim that Capitalism destroyed his city:

(H/T: Mediaite)

Comments (324)

1 2 3 ... 7
  • Anne Marie Pogo
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:37am

    Ask one of these college student protesters this question: If daddy sends you $500, a month pocket money, and your roommate’s daddy sends him $100. a month, would you want to give your roommate $200. so that you each have $300.? Might hit home.

    Report Post »  
    • rangerp
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:42am

      Marx was so lazy, he let his own kid starve to death. He sat around trying to find way to soak the rich, because he did not have enough gumption to get out and make his own money.

      Report Post » rangerp  
    • chazman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:49am

      … communism is the enemy of freedom. Always has been, always will be …

      Report Post »  
    • So
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 9:14am

      The mindless chanting is insane. No questions about who these people are that they are mimicking.
      The groups are against capitalism, but they chant the words spoken to them verbatim from the ultra rich.

      Why don’t they think? Why don’t they work? Do they want everything for free?

      They better think twice about what they are asking for. Because I‘ll bet you they don’t have a nano clue.

      The occupations should be stopped. It isn’t a protest it is a campaign that is pure treason.

      Not one word from Obummer. Not a word.

      Report Post »  
    • DanWesson455
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 9:16am

      Ann is my darling commentator for the right. You go Girl. Doubt there is one of these DIP WADS that could come close to her in a real debate. They only have overburned adjectives to describe “THEIR MOVEMENT” that have been around for ages. Idiots…do you see any working communism anywhere in the world? They all think they have the answer but are soooo clueless as to what the end product would be if they ever succeeded. Maybe then they would see the light having to work on some commune farm in Iowa in the 95 degree summer heat…..Again…DIP WADS.

      Report Post » DanWesson455  
    • PubliusPencilman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 9:17am

      Ann Coulter on 9/11 widows:
      “These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by griefparrazies. I have never seen people enjoying their husband’s death so much.”

      And you folks listen to her?

       
    • Anne Marie Pogo
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 9:22am

      Or, a better question than my original post might be: If you choose to work to help with the cost of your college education, and your roommate is consttantly broke because he chooses not to work, would you be willing to split your earning with your roommate so that you both have an equal share?

      Report Post »  
    • Wayner
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 9:25am

      Middle class? Middle class??? Do those ragtag filthy looking hippes look like the middle class?

      Report Post »  
    • PubliusPencilman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 9:26am

      And yet, protests against an unfair status quo also brought down the USSR.

      When it comes down to it, these protestors aren’t attacking capitalism–they aren’t attacking small businesses and and other proud folk that Conservatives like to hold up as the American ideal. They are protesting the elites–the self-serving kleptocracy that destroys and perverts everything positive about capitalism (freedom to choose, social mobility, etc.). I’m not saying that they like capitalism–of course they don’t. But they are targeting what is broken about our current system, and that’s what all of YOU should be concerned with.

      It‘s a small mind that can’t look outside its own lock-step ideology. Think a bit more.

       
    • resme
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 9:28am

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZmPWcLQ1Mk&feature=player_embedded

      Report Post » resme  
    • JRook
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 9:55am

      I’m sure Ann will appreciate someone other than FOX News trying to keep her from being totally irrelevant. Either that or she has another ideological embarrassing book coming out.

      Report Post »  
    • Badtime
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 10:00am

      @ Ann Marie Pogo

      Your question is a false equivalency at best. Moreover, that isn’t what this movement is about. Maybe you should do a bit of reading rather than assuming that the voices of Limbaugh, Beck, and Fox are telling you an unbiased story.
      http://occupywallst.org/forum/detailed-list-of-demands-overview-of-tactics-for-d/

      Report Post »  
    • PuddinSkins
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 10:06am

      PUBLIUS, I don’t think they realize exactly what they are protesting though, they place capitalism and the free market into the same global bucket without separating the fact that it’s cronie capitalism they are really trying to argue against, but they don’t realize it. I agree with you though, which surprises even me! The system is broken, we have large corporations in bed with our representatives on the left and the right, this gives them an unfair advantage over small businesses. Then we have Wallstreet with it’s bailouts that are handed over to them like candy.

      I am a Libertarian, and what the protesters are proposing is 180 degrees from what I believe when it comes to how much of a role the Federal Government should play in our lives.

      Anywho, just my 2 cents ;)

      Report Post » PuddinSkins  
    • MotoMofo
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 10:21am

      How many of these Wall St protesters will be watching with baited breath for the iPhone 5 announcement at 1pm EST? So ironic.

      Report Post » MotoMofo  
    • Anne Marie Pogo
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 10:22am

      @ Badtime – First of all, I get my news and opinion from a variety of sources including CNN & MSNBC. From listening to all, I’m gathering that these protests (at least in part) are of an anti-capitalist, share the wealth mentality. If I’m misunderstanding that message, then I do apologize.

       
    • jzs
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 10:25am

      Actually, that’s what a Democracy looks like. The right to peacefully assemble and petition the government for the redress of grievances is written into the Constitution.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • So
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 10:40am

      It’s not peaceful when the “protesters” purposely hold up traffic and purposely try to bring down Wall Street.

      Peaceful occupying. What a twisted world view.

      Report Post »  
    • PubliusPencilman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 10:40am

      And that’s a very reasonable post Puddinskins,

      Yet, maintstream boosters for capitalism have been resistant to any kind of reform that would attempt to remedy the problems of “crony capitalism.” Arguably, there is no “libertarian” solution to this mess–how would reducing regulation make Wall Street more honest and accountable?

      The modern Republican party has played a fast one on small and medium-sized businesses by convincing them that their interests lie in the unequivocal defense of a capitalist ideology that largely benefits fat cats and major corporations.

      There is no better example than here on The Blaze. The Tea Party claims to be a populist movement, yet so many folks on this site simply attack anything that Beck‘s and Rupert Murdoch’s media empire put in front of them.

       
    • joe1234
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 11:06am

      @publius…I see you attacking freedom and capitalism, which go hand in hand…as your democrat masters want you to…..

      Report Post » joe1234  
    • PubliusPencilman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 11:18am

      Joe, try to think just a bit beyond the talking points. You have the freedom to own a firearm, yet if someone uses that freedom to threaten and imprison someone else, is that freedom? That’s what is going on here–fat cats and major corporations manipulate the “free market” to serve their own ends. Regardless of whether or not you believe in the free market, you have to recognize that the system as it is is not free because of manipulation by elites.

      So please. If you want to respond in the future, try to say something that shows even the tiniest bit of thought. Otherwise, I would appreciate it if you let the adults do the talking.

       
    • HuskerDave
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 11:23am

      Liberalism is a mental illness. You can’t reason with that.

      Report Post »  
    • PubliusPencilman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 11:24am

      Ok. So student led protests against an unfair system are the road to totalitarianism.

      Yet Beck own Restoring Honor rally–an explicitely nationalist and militarist rally aimed at restoring national honor after what it argues was a period of weakness–can’t be compared to the rise of Nazi Germany?

      Stupid analogies cut both ways folks. Stop believing all the hysterical rhetoric just because it seems to line up with your political ideology.

       
    • resme
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 11:30am

      If you don’t see the fake capitalism we have right now, You are just as naive as the protesters. We have such a messed up system. Fiat currency, Wall street getting bailouts, This central banking has really destroyed us. While the money we earn continues to devalue. It’s a system that only makes the rich richer, Middle class families have to deal with a rise in commodities, While getting no wage increases. Let’s have free-market capitalism again, End the fed. Occupy the fed

      Report Post » resme  
    • TSUNAMI-22
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 11:35am

      @ PubliusPencilman

      You have the freedom to own a firearm, yet if someone uses that freedom to threaten and imprison someone else, is that freedom?
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      First of all, ridiculous analogy. Threatening someones freedom with a firearm that you were free to own is an evil expression of free will. The freedom of being able to acquire the firearm doesn’t have any bearing on the use or misuse of the firearm.

      Nice try at a thread hijack.

      Report Post »  
    • sWampy
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 11:47am

      No, it’s the liberals that fight for crony capitalism, left and right, they are the ones that started these ********* progressive tax structures that enable/encourage crony capitalism. Support a flat tax structure, with no breaks for anyone for any reason, and the corruption goes away, but liberals won’t even discuss this, they instantly wage class warfare. 10-0-0 or 0-10-0, with it being income, sales, corporate tax. Notice no corporate tax either way, corporate tax are just hidden income taxes. We also need to shine some sunlight on law makers, they should be audited hourly.

      Report Post »  
    • GhostOfJefferson
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:00pm

      @Publius

      In a sense you’re correct, however, you are taking them as an isolated from leadership random mob. They are not, and that’s where the problem comes in. They may well be doing what you say, and that in and of itself may not be a bad thing (depends on the scope of course), however, they‘re being used like all useful idiots by the same power brokers they’re protesting.

      Think about it, outside of *your* own ideology a bit. The media goes haywire over the almost docile, polite Tea Party demonstrations, calls us everything but…well no, they called us terrorists as well. Yet this mob is clearly defying laws and the media is absolutely silent. What does that tell you?

      Report Post » GhostOfJefferson  
    • GhostOfJefferson
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:01pm

      @JZS

      I never once heard you or anybody else on the Left say that about the Tea Party protests from 2009 forward. Isn’t that strange, how selective your embracing of our Constitutional rights is?

      So transparent, heh.

      Report Post » GhostOfJefferson  
    • PubliusPencilman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:03pm

      Tsunami,

      You’ve made my point exactly. You are free to acquire firearms, but there are of course laws that govern their use in our society in order to preserve the rights of others. As you suggest, these laws “have nothing to do” with the original right to own the weapons.

      The same with the market–you are free to participate in it, yet without rules and regulations in order to protect against abuse, then one can’t call the market “free.”

      Nice try at debunking.

       
    • GhostOfJefferson
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:05pm

      @Puddinskins

      We’re on the same page friend.

      Report Post » GhostOfJefferson  
    • GhostOfJefferson
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:12pm

      @Publius

      The “libertarian solution” is not to just remove regulations, that’s the GOP solution. It’s to remove business from government, and government from business, reduce or eliminate most personal and business taxes, reduce or eliminate capital gains taxes, etc.. If you don’t remove business from government (lobbyists and under the table deals, tit for tat, pay to play, etc) nor government from business (regs, et. al.) then you end up right back where we started.

      Government should be an impartial referee over a free market, it should not be the rule maker nor have a vested interest in the outcomes regarding any particular business segment. Business should be able to compete on its own and not be allowed to pay off politicians to create advantageous competition killing regs nor enacting special interest corporate welfare that knocks small and competing business out of the market.

      Report Post » GhostOfJefferson  
    • Mike N
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:23pm

      Don’t engage the demonstrators, don’t reward them for their efforts . . .simply walk on by, empty faced, and let them feel deprived of any return on their invested effort. They knew going into this that they were not going to produce anything of value, but were banking on others buckling under and simply giving them what they want . . . a footloose, worry free, Hakuna-Matata-Baby lifestyle.

      It’s no wonder the vast majority of drug abusers and alcoholics are liberals. They’re always trying to escape reality, and the notion that “you don’t get something for nothing”.

      Report Post »  
    • TSUNAMI-22
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:23pm

      @ PubliusPencilman

      The same with the market–you are free to participate in it, yet without rules and regulations in order to protect against abuse, then one can’t call the market “free.
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      This is similar to the same argument that speed-limit signs prevent people from speeding, or gun control laws prevent guns from getting into the hands of criminals.

      Laws don’t “prevent” anything. Enforcement of law doesn’t prevent anything either, especially when the SEC (the enforcers) are corrupt and manipulative.

      By the way, if the law says I have to pay taxes on my income, but I don’t because I work under the table, who’s gonna make me pay? If they catch me and jail me – so be it. They can pay for my room and board for all the years I paid into the system. They waste my tax money, I waste their time.

      Report Post »  
    • PubliusPencilman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:24pm

      GhostofJefferson,

      So by your own admission, the aim of the protests is not necessarily for a bad (or at least totalitarian) cause. Your problem seems to be entirely in the media coverage. Yet, even if the coverage at times is biased (Fox news’s coverage is OBVIOUSLY biased, are other news outlets in the other direction), this does not constitute proof of a larger conspiracy. In fact, as many of you are fond of pointing out, Fox News often holds as much as half of the daily news audience–this means that at least half is getting the anti-protest bias (at least as many as are getting the bias on the other side).

      I’m not a fan of such blatant bias on either side of the news–I would rather have people think for themselves, which is what I was hoping we could do here.

       
    • AvengerK
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:27pm

      Once again JZS soils himself with his own post. Unfortunately for you sport, these idiots have not chosen to “petition their governement to redress their grievances ”…they’ve chosen to protest capitalism as a whole, targeting financial institutions and stock exchanges. I was going to ask..are you really that stupid JZS? Clearly you are after your sad display.

      Report Post »  
    • Rightsofman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:27pm

      Nah. Never work – your premis is based on the assumption of the ability to reason. That ability has been washed out of these tools brains by the Socialist Education System that they’ve been subjected to for so long, also smoking too much dope. Remember they’ve been taught by the “sex, drugs and rock and roll” generation.

      Report Post »  
    • TSUNAMI-22
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:30pm

      @ PubliusPencilman

      Yet, even if the coverage at times is biased (Fox news’s coverage is OBVIOUSLY biased, are other news outlets in the other direction), this does not constitute proof of a larger conspiracy. In fact, as many of you are fond of pointing out, Fox News often holds as much as half of the daily news audience–this means that at least half is getting the anti-protest bias (at least as many as are getting the bias on the other side).

      I’m not a fan of such blatant bias on either side of the news–I would rather have people think for themselves, which is what I was hoping we could do here.
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      Even MSNBC and CNN are saying that the peeps at the sit-in have no direction and are actually hurting their own supposed cause.

      I actually watch more MSNBC than FOX. Keep your enemies closer………

      Report Post »  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:36pm

      No PUBLIUSPENCILNECK….they’re not targeting “what’s wrong with capitalism”…they want the whole institution dismantled but unfortuntately, they can’t vocalize what they want to replace it with. We know what they want to replace it with..but they won’t admit “marxism” is the replacement. All they can vocalize is that capitalism is supposedly evil and exploitative, some banalities about “the top one percent”, the usual redistributionist fantasies..then it’s a hodge-podge of ending foreclosures, some nebulous demand for jobs (as if dismantling the financial system will accomplish this). They’re a gaggle of professional anarchists/marxists and their somnambulistic, indoctrinated automatons who have no idea what kind of mess they want to unleash on the country. Get some better material sport because we’ve seen the interviews, we’ve read the websites…they don‘t match what you’re saying.

      Report Post »  
    • PubliusPencilman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:48pm

      GhostofJefferson,

      I completely agree that the government needs to be free from manipulation by the big business. However, it’s all well and good to say it needs to act like a “referee,” but that’s not exactly a policy solution–it’s a vague and completely generalized metaphor. After all, referee’s literally have undisputed power in a game, which is not commonly the position that libertarians want for the government. Nor does this metaphor explain exactly who will be writing the rules for this game (referee‘s don’t have to write the rules–they are established from the get-go). It‘s the writing of the rules in the first place that’s the most controvercial issue–but I think that we would all agree that without rules, you can’t have a fair game.

       
    • PubliusPencilman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:49pm

      Tsunami,

      “Laws don’t “prevent” anything. Enforcement of law doesn’t prevent anything either”
      I admit that I have no ready answer to your completely counter-intuitive non-logic. Anytime time you want to come down from lala land, maybe we can talk.

       
    • Ethereal
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 1:08pm

      I think it’s time to send all of the liberals somewhere else so they can start their own country and we will re-birth American capitalism in the spirit of the industrial revolution. Let them handle their own business and government then measure how each country’s people are doing 25 years down the line and we can use all of the standard throw-back criteria that we are still supposed to be using today. Any guesses as to the outcome?

      Report Post » Ethereal  
    • GhostOfJefferson
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 1:21pm

      By my own admission? As if I was disputing something? My problem has something to do with the selective coverage and demonization of pro-free market forces while remaining utterly silent on anti-free market forces protesting. My real issue is with how this will be used. Please, I’m not a newcomer to politics suddenly awakened in 2007/2008, nor a person with a GED and four teeth…I have multiple college degrees and I’ve been involved in party politics since the late 1980’s. As anybody familiar with how politics works knows, Machiavelli is embraced with gusto by both the nominal left and the nominal right. The portrayal in the non-“right wing” media is a tip off to which side is working to profit from this, and which side is not. The clearly left wing news outlets, the ones that make no bones about their political affiliation, are either silent on this, or are ambivalent towards it, who were just a month ago calling peaceful tea party protestors, I believe “terrorists”. This means that while the protestors may well be benevolent (or not, I don’t think that all of their goals are lofty and pure, in fact I’m seeing that most of them have no idea what they’re actually protesting and are there just to be rowdy), how this will be used will have nothing to do with eliminating crony capitalism, but rather, to further push totalitarianism.

      Life is not lived compartmentalized, nor should it be analyzed in a compartmentalized fashion.

      Report Post » GhostOfJefferson  
    • TSUNAMI-22
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 1:44pm

      Lala land is all I have, and you want to take that from me too?

      Report Post »  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 1:47pm

      peaceful protests do not infringe on the rights of others.

      Report Post »  
    • GhostOfJefferson
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 1:57pm

      No, referees in fact do not have undisputed power in the game, but a pedantic point at best. There is a certain level where there is involvement between business and government, the rules and the enforcement, however, when I state I want business out of government, I also stated I want government out of business. The later means that I don’t want government determining winners and losers through market or currency manipulations, nor do I want government redistributing wealth from one company to another to make things “fair”, nor granting monopolies as government is wont to do (utility companies and cable companies in the 1990’s come to mind), nor do I want government boosting or tearing down a business that is acting peacefully and lawfully, for any reason. To only agree to remove business from government, while giving government free reign to muck in business at will creates a situation where business is forced to defend its economic interests, which inexorably leads to business becoming entangled in government and we’re back to square one.

      This is common history of course, the less government/business interaction one has outside of simple rule enforcement and a very light burden of rule, the better. The less business is involved in helping “create policy”, the better. But only if both conditions are followed. It can’t be either or. That’s where the left and right both mess up.

      Report Post » GhostOfJefferson  
    • Polwatcher
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 1:57pm

      These crazy commie punks want to throw the baby out with the bathwater. They would cut off their nose to spite their face. They are nuts and full of hate. They are worthless and no amount of justification from parties here or elsewhere can change that. Obama, Bush II, Clinton, and surely Bush I have all had worthless and crooked appointees who are nothing more than thieves in disguise. If the SEC actually inforced the law, the wall street financiers of the Democrat party would be in jail. It’s pretty bad when the AG himself is a liar and crook. The free market only works when government uniformly enforces the law. That is what is wrong with Mexico and most other banana republics. We had better throw the political bums out and get rid of the crooks working in government. We need to reduce the size of the Federal Government by 50% for starters.

      Report Post »  
    • Eaglesyx
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 1:58pm

      It appears that the only reply that’s available is to Anne Marie Pogo, but I really want to reply to PubliusPencilman

      You quoted from the discussion of the so-called 9/11 wives. Coulter’s statement is absolutely right on. THe claim is made that the victims of 9/11 were the first casualties of the war on terror. That may be so, but every soldier, sailer, Marine and Airman killed in Iraq, Afghanistan and other locations are no less casualties of the war on terror. Tell me, why aren’t their spouses entitled to millions of dollars in restitution? They’re just as dead. Their families get a few thousand dollars of insurance money and less than a thousand dollars for burial. Their kids are on their own for college if their mother remarries and that’s the end and sum total of their “benefits”. Either those families are entitled to the same benefits as a 9/11 family or a 9/11 family is entitled to the same benefits as a serviceman’s family. Which should it be? I don’t begrudge them their sorrow and some help, but why the disparity? Why do their kids get half an issue of People magazine and the soldier’s kids get nothing? Why does a stock broker‘s wife get millions of dollars and a Sailor’s wife gets a few thousands?

      Report Post »  
    • Mustangdave
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 2:18pm

      I doubt it….

      Report Post » Mustangdave  
    • Doris
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 2:19pm

      They sound just like that woman a couple years ago who wanted Obama money.I mean how stupid is “If the rich would share their money we could all live in prosperity.”If I were rich I wouldnt want any of those idiots to have a penny.Let them work for their money. They must think all rich people just have money with no job or brain involvement. Bill Gates used his head.Other have used braun.This is like that woman a couple years ago who wanted money. Who’s money? “Obama money.He going to give it to us”.Pure stupidity. They should all go to Cuba to live. Please go.

      Report Post »  
    • honeybunch
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 2:56pm

      Excellent but they still would not “get it”! Duh?

      Report Post » honeybunch  
    • Hollywood
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 3:26pm

      Sorry,BUT,they wouldn’t understand the math!

      Report Post » Hollywood  
    • Solzhenitsin
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 3:46pm

      Here come the trolls to shout down those who dare to think beyond the headline. The tell us, of course, that we don‘t really think because we don’t reach the conclusions they do, the same conclusions we’d reach if we simply accepted as truth the presentations of the mainstream media. You’re so transparent.

      Report Post »  
    • PubliusPencilman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 4:01pm

      EagleSyx,
      I’m not really sure what it is you are responding to. When did I say that war widows should not be given compensation? If it were my choice, they deserve as much as we can give for the sacrifices they and their loved ones have made.

      The Coulter quote was simply to illustrate her willingness to attack almost anyone to get attention, including the widows of 9/11.

      Report Post »  
    • marthasusan40
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 4:09pm

      Well said…love it.

      Report Post »  
    • PubliusPencilman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 4:12pm

      GhostofJefferson,

      As far as the silence of the liberal media goes, you’re missing the obvious point: people protest like this to get exposure and media coverage. The media’s silence HURTS their cause. Complain all you want about the media, but their reporting on the Tea Party has resulted in the group’s national exposure and influence well beyond what its membership would warrant. And by the way, I think the “terrorist” claim you are referring to comes from the charge that Biden supposedly agreed when someone called the Tea Party terrorists during a caucus meeting. This is no where near the same thing as the media calling the Tea Party terrorists.

      But as far as your libertarian ideals go, they are just that: pie-in-the-sky ideals. You claim that they are based on historical reality, but when exactly was this time that business stayed out of government and government stayed out of business and everyone was happy? The points you make again sound far more like bumper sticker slogans than thought-out policy. In that sense, it’s no better than the goofy slogans that these kids are yelling out at the protest.

      Report Post »  
    • PubliusPencilman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 4:14pm

      Are you talking about me Solzhenitsin? If you want to get into a debate, maybe you shouldn’t hide behind vague, general statements.

      Report Post »  
    • Longpond
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 4:46pm

      I think the answer would be “No, someone who doesn’t go to college should be taxed an additional $800 so each of the college slackers could have $700/month”

      Report Post »  
    • ravenhairedmaid
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 5:05pm

      (Sigh)
      Sorry Anne Marie, that strategy has been tried at least twice. And failed.
      A couple years ago, some conservative students at George Mason made videos of them asking liberal students if they got all A’s, would they redistribute their gpa to those who got lower scores? The libs all objected, and yet none of them connected the dots. And surely you saw the lib/prog reaction to the affirmative action bake sale.
      “Educated” doesn’t necessarily mean “smart.”

      Report Post » ravenhairedmaid  
    • 4blackhorses
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 5:15pm

      These students have no idea what they are doing. One student said he wanted to do away with capatalism, the interveiwer asked him what he woould replace it with. Talk about a deer in the headlights look on the kids face!!

      Report Post »  
    • CaliG
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 5:26pm

      Very Good Post! May I Post it To Twitter?

      Report Post »  
    • Komponist-ZAH
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:22pm

      Publi—

      “You have the freedom to own a firearm, yet if someone uses that freedom to threaten and imprison someone else, is that freedom?”

      It is abuse of freedom, which actually says nothing about freedom itself, or the firearm, either.

      “That’s what is going on here–fat cats and major corporations manipulate the ‘free market’ to serve their own ends. Regardless of whether or not you believe in the free market, you have to recognize that the system as it is is not free because of manipulation by elites.”

      If the “system as it is is not free”, then how can it be a *free* market (i.e., capitalism)?

      And what is the mechanism of this manipulation?

      Report Post »  
    • MaxineH20Sux
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:53pm

      Amen! I wish someone would ask one of them that!

      Report Post » MaxineH20Sux  
    • JapesMacfarland
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:26pm

      Brilliant! Thank you. :)

      Report Post »  
    • Delete the Elite
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 10:21pm

      This kid knows more about what is going on then ALOT of people on this site (but not all).
      http://youtu.be/rQow0Fhua1A

      Report Post »  
    • unclebarry
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 11:45pm

      Anne—That’s good. May I use it?

      Report Post »  
    • NewMexicoBorn
      Posted on October 5, 2011 at 7:49am

      The basis of the Democrats ideas isn’t that everyone should have to share all of their money…

      A better example would be this: Two college students go to the same school, and have the same educational history, and the same amount of money available to them.

      But, one boy has to pay $3,000 per semester, while the other one only pays $150, because the other one knows a guy who works in the bursars office.

      The basic idea is this: corporations pay hardly any money in taxes. The richest 5% pay hardly anything in taxes. They’re supposed to, but they don’t, due to loopholes that their accountants exploit.
      THAT is what these protesters want changed.

      They don’t want your money. They just want everyone to pay the same taxes as anyone else.

      Also, they’d rather raise the tax rate for the richest 5% by 2%, taking it from 35% to 37%. They’d rather due this than cut education funding, military funding, and medicare funding.

      Don’t worry guys, no one wants to force you to share. :/

      Report Post »  
    • sbleve
      Posted on October 5, 2011 at 9:30am

      The probable answer is ‘oh, this is different’. Meaning what is mine is mine, what is yours is mine also. The real danger to the world is that higher education has become part of a cultist politic, world wide. The dark ages have never been so hidden.

      Report Post » sbleve  
    • pavilion
      Posted on October 5, 2011 at 12:58pm

      Why do these kids want a college education? If it is to get a good job and make money – then isn’t that against everything that they are rallying against. If asked, woud any of them agree to signing a contract that if they are hired on at a large company they would agree to give up 50% to 70% of their salary for the “common good”. Would they also agree that any new hires making less money than they are making would agree to make up the difference so that their salaries would be the same. I think not. What is really scary is these idiots can vote – if this is the next generation that will lead our country we are in real trouble. However, we all know they are zombies just following the instructions given them by SEIU, Van Jones, Richard Trumka, and all the Sorros mugs.

      Report Post »  
    • Max jones
      Posted on October 6, 2011 at 12:11am

      How many people can actually see beyond the limitations of his own interest?
      I think, not many. This may be the main reason for the chaos. Critical thinking is
      not available to.the nihilist mob.

      Report Post » Max jones  
  • HoneyCrisp
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:28am

    Basically they want to live off Mom & Dad for the rest of their lives. Spoiled brat kids who want everything given to them and who don’t want to work for a living, just live off others. Parasitic leeches who want others to give them whatever they want. Pathetic.

    Report Post » HoneyCrisp  
    • kwolfburg
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:36am

      No they will turn in their parents, for the sake of the revolution. Ann is right, so was Glenn. Top down, Bottom up, and Inside out.

      Report Post »  
    • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:45am

      @Kwolfburg — indeed, top down, bottom up, inside out. These fools fail to understand that if they are part of the transition to a socialist or totalitarian system, they will be the first put to the wall.

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • db321
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 11:17am

      Protestors – before it started a handful of people have already decided a long time ago what you’re being used for and when it is finished EVERYONE will have to stick to these policies. Protestors your only being used so that others with more evil and more greedy agenda’s can get what they want – you’re not going to like it – and the next time you try to protest to change it back – you will be executed – welcome to Marxist Social take over – translated be careful what you ask for.

      Soros, Van Jones and other Marxist have been planning what you are just now learning about for years – protestors you are being used and you will very soon see the destruction of America that your very protest helped to start. When reality sets in your not going to be very proud of yourself. All of you protestor’s are basically digging your own grave and you’re doing it with such pride – Millions of American will suffer because you were such an obedient “Useful Idiot”.

      Report Post » db321  
    • Solzhenitsin
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 3:43pm

      They are coercive utopians who really don’t care about the real world costs of forcing their ideology on the rest of us.

      Report Post »  
  • euragone
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:27am

    I think some of you have forgotten something….The Bill of Rights…..

    Amendment I

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    This is Their Right Under the Bill of Rights.. I might not agree with most of what the protesters are saying, but they have that right too speak their piece!

    If your Scared of an Out Come becoming something like totalitarianism then the next article should be used.. but should be organized in some form of unit…

    Amendment II

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    Arm yourself and learn to use the weapon of choice..

    Something that wasn’t said..

    Our Revolution for Independence started in away close to this as well !!!

    Report Post » euragone  
    • Harold B
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:46am

      First ammendment is being disolved with the Seperation of Church and state disallowing ministers to disagree with liberal ideology.
      Next the second ammendment is soon to go, that is why the depraved Ms Kagan is on the Supreme court

      Report Post »  
    • NJTMATO
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 9:21am

      YES, our Revolution was testy but it wasn’t like this, those men had a REAL reason….and I disagree that we are “afraid” of what these idiots are saying….actually, I am more apalled than afraid. I am apalled that these well (over) educated, facebook using, iphone app tards don’t even KNOW why they are protesting or what it is for! They are sheep following Van Jones, Frances Fox Piven, Michael Moore, Susan Serandon….trying to recapture the “feeling” of the 1960′s. They don’t understand that this administration is closely tied to Wall Street and Corporations…they don’t understand that business provides jobs…they think the rich should pay their share….HA….they already pay more and donate more to charities than any of these slugs would even hope for. Their Facebook usage supports Zuckerberg nicely…what’s he up to? 17 billion? This whole thing is a complete joke that is NOT funny because it is sucking in these useless idiots and will hurt our country.

      Report Post » NJTMATO  
    • mzk1
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 10:27am

      You are missing something here. In the U.S., you have the right to peaceably assemble; you don’t even need a permit for an outdoor protest. (I used to protest against the USSR, and I recall the police telling me that.)

      But you don’t have the right to block the sidewalk after the police tell you to move.

      Report Post »  
    • Lord_Frostwind
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:40pm

      You think these revolutionaries understand what they are doing? That’s cute. Truth is, every one of these revolutions, no matter how noble the intention, almost always end up making the situation far worse than whatever they were trying to fix. If you don’t believe that, take a good long look at Africa and see just how good they have done with all that freedom they’ve had over the past few decades. Revolutions are ugly things, and right now these fools are trying to break the lid on Pandora’s Box.

      Wake up and understand that these people are being used. And don’t go spouting off the drivel about beck and rush, last time I checked their followers weren’t getting arrested for blocking traffic or repeating their every word like zombies.

      Report Post » Lord_Frostwind  
    • Solzhenitsin
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 3:58pm

      The Bill of Rights will only protect us as long as the government recognizes its authority. Once these radicals believe they have a critical mass of dupes to back them up, they will attempt to suspend the constitution and all those rights will be moot.

      Report Post »  
  • cntrlfrk
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:25am

    ‘
    Ann is right.

    These protests have only 1 purpose, the same purpose of the Anti-War Rallies during the Bush Administration that have mysteriously disappeared.

    The are Anti-American, and Anti-Capitalism, making them Anti-Freedom.

    .

    Report Post » cntrlfrk  
    • GeorgieJo
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 9:01am

      Ann’s book DEMONIC spells this out so well.

      Report Post »  
    • Solzhenitsin
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 3:50pm

      They are to create a situation which those in power can exploit to seize more power and take over. Those apologists who try to tell you otherwise are either in on it or are among the deceived.

      Report Post »  
  • Slayer
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:22am

    The list of demands put forth by this bunch is the exact same thing that Obama would have implemented if he had more time. And every one of their ideas is a disaster. $20 minimum wage? Being paid NOT to work? ‘Free’ education and healthcare? Forgiveness of all debt – just because? Open borders for all? These people are incredibly dangerous in their hatred for America and are going to wind up ruining us all with the help of the media and the Democrats.

    Report Post » Slayer  
    • let us prey
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:38am

      Some Slayer for you,
      Anarchy, disarray this is the world today
      Justice is a lie for the followers to get by
      No peace, only guns, can’t trust anyone
      Live or die it’s an eye for an eye

      Unrest, marshal law, society decays
      And it’s safe to say there is no other way
      With lawless arrogance and savage dissidents
      Public display of dismemberment

      Blameless innocent, lies of the decadent
      Brazen hypocrites answering to idiots
      New tax, market crash, high life never lasts
      No quick fix, for broken politics

      Report Post » let us prey  
  • Atokaite
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:20am

    Listen to Ann C on FM.
    Her comments are spot on.
    Fox, MSM, seem to have abandond Glenns previous tenure shows entirely. This current October Surprise in NYC was predicted months ago.
    Coulter, Horowitz, Beck, etal including Old Rush, have the background. Check thier sites, as well as the Obscure Leftist sites. This entire Van Jones operation has been in the works since June 2011.
    end
    Semper Fi

    Report Post » Atokaite  
    • Solzhenitsin
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 4:03pm

      The left will always tell you what they plan to do by accusing the right of it first. Everything they said of the Tea Party is true of Occupy Wall Street- it’s preplanned and funded by politicians and billionaires, advertised to sympathetic groups who are manipulated and exploited by the very people they decry.

      Report Post »  
  • tobywil2
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:17am

    The objective of these wretched dredges of humanity? See cartoon http://commonsense21c.com/images/CHANGE_TBI.jpg

    Report Post » tobywil2  
  • ares338
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:14am

    If you listen to these kids closely, you won’t hear anything but slogans that have been pounded into their fertile (fetid?) minds. These are not your brightest and best scholars folks. Someone. Has convinced them that they can have a parasitic life by exploiting the people that actually work. If they think that by having a job means they get to sit around in a circle holding hands and singing Kumbayah, then reality is going to hit them very hard.

    Report Post » ares338  
  • ZengaPA65
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:12am

    The US has been preparing for totalitarianism since immediately after 911.

    Report Post » ZengaPA65  
    • Rocky_biskit
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:30am

      No, it started Sept, 11 1991

      “Out of these troubled times, our objective—a new world order—can emerge. Today, that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we have known.”~ George Herbert Walker Bush

      Report Post »  
    • fatjack
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 11:55am

      Rocky_biskit, bingo.

      Report Post » fatjack  
    • mzk1
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 1:40pm

      Oh, Puleeze! The same thing was said in the VietNam war era, and it never happened.

      “The long night of fascism always seems to be falling over the United States – and always manages to land in Europe.”

      If the PATRIOT act is fascism, then what was the home front during WWII?

      Report Post »  
  • tobywil2
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:11am

    Are these pathetic creatures the first attempt to produce the civil unrest to justify martial law and prevent the 2012 election? http://commonsense21c.com/

    Report Post » tobywil2  
    • Badtime
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 10:04am

      What an astounding leap of logic!

      Please, enlighten me how a group of citzens exercising their 1st amendment rights will somehow keep a presidental election from occuring?

      I mean really, do you think ANYONE would say “lets forego the democratic processes that we all believe to be vital to the survival of our republic.“ do you think any foreign ally would say ”Oh look – America is becoming a dictatorship, lets just sit on the sidelines and watch – ill get the popcorn.”

      Please, stop regurgitating baseless fears.

      Report Post »  
  • I_Hate_Libs
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:11am

    I wonder how many of them are collecting Obama dollars in the form of welfare?

    The horror of the Democrat mind.

    Report Post »  
    • spirit of freedom
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:21am

      if i‘ve said it once i’ve said it a thousand times. “liberalism is a mental disorder” and will go down in history as such.

      Report Post » spirit of freedom  
  • I_Hate_Libs
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:10am

    I was thinking more like the beginning of the “Planet of the Apes”

    The horror of the Democrat mind.

    Report Post »  
    • chazman
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:52am

      … there is no such thing as a ‘democrat’ anymore. They are Liberal Marxist now and have been for many years …

      Report Post »  
    • godhead
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 9:55am

      And no such thing as a Republican. They have been fascist right wing religious extremists.

      Report Post »  
    • joe1234
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 11:04am

      @pothead…the only fascists are jack-booted brown-shirted liberals like you.

      Report Post » joe1234  
  • florida123
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:04am

    Ann, your making too much of these Hippie good for nothings………..They dont even know why they are protesting, These people are the fringe of society and no one is really paying them any mind. Cold weather is coming to NYC they will be gone by Halloween, and never to be seen again!!

    Report Post » florida123  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:02am

    Once again we do see how many people are getting it, and Mr Coulter is on the money, this is the beginnings of a drive for a “winner take all” style seizure of power that will end in either freedom for us all, or the reign of a dictator or totalitarian system in which we go into the night.

    Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • MARCH4HIM
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:09am

      Did you get to see the clip of Rosann Barr..wanting to bring back the Guillotine and reprograming camps for the people that dont conform..Glenn Beck showed last night…I’m suprised its not on the Blaze.

      Report Post » MARCH4HIM  
    • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:44am

      @March — Check on the sight during the day; most likely there will be more added to the story than just the video of what she was saying. Also, look on the story on the GlennBeck.com web sight on the right hand collum.

      Sometimes with stories such as her calling for executions and such, the Blaze takes a day to get it up and running, and to find out even more information and links as well.

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • MARCH4HIM
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 9:06am

      @snow
      Thankyou

      Report Post » MARCH4HIM  
    • DanielBurke
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 10:27am

      I think you are 100% right on that; unfortunately only the Tea Party is resisting. Don’t hear or see anything from the spinelss GOP. Guess they‘re OK with trashing the country as long as they get their piece of what’s left.

      Report Post » DanielBurke  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:59am

    Government schools and the media have done a good job of erasing the horror of communism from the minds of a lot of Americans. These kids really do think that the Eastern block countries were better under Soviet rule and Cuba has been better under Castro etc. Will we ever be able to right the ship? I’m not sure we can. Pray for America.

    Report Post » Gonzo  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:30am

      After Barry is voted out in 12 it‘ll be very difficult maybe impossible to fix the damage he’s done because of the regulations he’s piled on,from the DOE to EPA and many others.I just hope it isn’t too late.

      Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:52am

      It started long before we ever heard of Barry. Even if we had Reagan back, I’m not sure what you could do. It’s like a cancer we let grow for far too long, cutting it out might kill the patient. It’s going to be very difficult.

      Report Post » Gonzo  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 2:15pm

      I know the assault on the constitution began over a century ago but Barry has accelerated the pace and in the next election we‘ll decide which way we’re going to go.I still maintain Barry will lose big.

      Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • Norm D. Plume
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 2:38pm

      We’re faced with a choice:

      Cutting out the cancer might kill the patient.

      NOT cutting out the cancer WILL kill the patient.

      The choice is now clear.

      Report Post » Norm D. Plume  
    • JapesMacfarland
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 9:00pm

      If there really is or continues to be a conservative, or liberty first, cultural revolution in this country, maybe more movies will start to be made about the realities of communism. Maybe more teachers will start teaching the history and not just focus on Hitler, but also Stalin (20 to 40 million) Mao (75 million., greatest mass murderer in human history) Pol Pot (nightmare 1 to 2 million, many one by one beheaded) Th Chinese decimation, genocide, torture and occupation of the oldest civilization, Tibet, Japan’s slaughter of 50 million Chinese during WW2, Cuba‘s destroying of generations of people over a bad idea and one man’s bullying, HItler’s actual similarity to socialism instead of the selective distortion that he was the opposite…and on and on. 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by the left, and by people with the same ideas as Marx, thinking they could change the world for the better. Yet hardly any Americans know of any of this. If I was Pres., I would work to abolish the teacher’s unions, the DOE, first thing.

      Report Post »  
  • MARCH4HIM
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:57am

    not to be off suject here but am i the only one gettting locked up on the Blaze ?

    Report Post » MARCH4HIM  
  • Locked
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:53am

    Well, no one ever claimed she’s the brightest bulb in the bunch. This is what the beginning of anarchy looks like; basically the opposite of totalitarianism.

    Report Post »  
    • G man
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:00am

      Anarchy is the mother of totalitarianism idiot.

      Report Post » G man  
    • bilorites
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:02am

      no…. anarchy would LEAD to Totalitarianism…. the govt reaction would be that

      Report Post »  
    • G man
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:26am

      Oy! The use of mother is in the context of giving birth to….. I’m beginning to think half the people on this site will shoot themselves in the foot as the draw their weapon.

      Report Post » G man  
    • Locked
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:43am

      @G Man

      That’s like saying the beginning of totalitarianism is a declining economy. Or economies in the first place lead to totalitarianism. It’s not a direct cause; the correct answer would be the collapse of society is a breeding ground for totalitarianism. Oddly enough, protests can occur and not end in a totalitarian regime (see, for example, India’s escape from colonialism).

      Or, to put it more simply, you’re wrong :)

      Report Post »  
    • joe1234
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 11:07am

      anarchy always leads to totalitarianism……the so-called ‘anarchists’ are marxists.

      Report Post » joe1234  
    • Locked
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 11:29am

      @Joe

      Many of them are socialists, and readily admit to it. Many more are just angry people distressed that the world they were promised by their parents and grandparents is no longer being delivered; ironically, these people have the same anger at the status quo as the Tea Party. Their goals might be vague and but my point is that totalitarianism is not the only outcome from protests.

      Report Post »  
  • KickinBack
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:52am

    “Demonic” was a good book. I especially enjoyed the sections where she delves into the history of the French Revolution and parallels them with modern day progressives. (Beck has covered that as well) Scary stuff.

    Report Post » KickinBack  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on October 5, 2011 at 5:43am

      Yeah, one thing that doesn’t seem to have dawned on her about all those historical parallels she drew – all of those countries did have really bad governments. Even though things undeniably turned out badly, the people were not wrong to want to throw the bums out.

      Report Post »  
  • notreally
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:52am

    “Demonic” is a real eye-opener, one of those books that leave you with: “Why didn’t I see that connection? It’s so simple and so bloody obvious!”

    Report Post »  
  • lodgerat
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:51am

    It’s scarey to listen to these young people explain what should replace capitalism. I especially liked the answer the young girl gave about not taking a job if offered to her. I guess she would rather be a street bum marching for useless causes. Man our country is really headed in the wrong direction if this is our future generation.

    Report Post » lodgerat  
    • woodyl1011fl
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 12:35pm

      Remember all these young people were/are being educated/indoctrinated in public/government school system from k-12 and colleges and universities. Screwtape‘s pals are every where and Ann Coulter’s book “Demonic” nailed it!

      Report Post »  
  • Secessionista
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:51am

    Ann Coulter doesn’t know squat. She and the rest of her Fox News friends wish to maintain the status-quo. And why not? They are profiting enormously from it while many become poorer and poorer.

    Report Post » Secessionista  
    • demint.disciple
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:23am

      What did you you eat today at the protest ? Did you have fun ?

      Report Post » demint.disciple  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:46am

      So how much money should the government take from those evil rich people to pay them not to work?
      Tax them at 85 95% hell why not tax at 100%.Better yet let’s just cut their heads off like lard A$$ Roseanne wants.

      No matter what the public schools teach there’s winners and losers in this world and that crowd is in the loser camp,sucks to be them,instead of wanting government to be their slave master they should have learned how to support themselves.

      Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • Solzhenitsin
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 3:55pm

      Are you insane? Yeah- that’s got to be it, or you’re having a really bad trip. Stay away from the brown acid, dudette.

      Report Post »  
  • Secessionista
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:50am

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZmPWcLQ1Mk&feature=player_embedded

    Report Post » Secessionista  
    • let us prey
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:04am

      Is this the only kid that has a clue that the fed is printing fake money? Are these the same people that claim there is still money and we are not broke? I get mixed messages from the protestors/revolution crazed puppets. IMO

      Report Post » let us prey  
  • mrsmileyface
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:44am

    Funny how in the crowd there was a person wearing the now famous “Guy Fox” mask from the movie V for Vengence. Unless you disagree and V was about rainbows and flowers.

    Report Post » mrsmileyface  
    • old white guy
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:58am

      interesting that the guy who followed anne said that her positions were exagerated. if you want to be slaves to left , commie governments go ahesd but i won’t be with you, infact i would hope to be fighting with tea party people.

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on October 5, 2011 at 5:38am

      Since you got the title wrong, and you’ve obviously never heard of Guy Fawkes, I don’t think anyone will rely on you to tell them what V For Vendetta is about.

      Report Post »  
  • hillbillyinny
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:43am

    As much as she irritates me, Coulter is so often on or very, very close to the target! She uses extremism to make a name for herself, but moderate, at least slightly, her statements and voice and it is what those of us thinkers who understand what these “children” have been taught for the last 150 years of progressivism and secularism, and she really understands “the other side.”

    DEMONIC is a classic on the War between Good and Evil. (I’ve read the back of The Book, and WE WIN! It’s going to be a view of he*l getting there. . . )

    Report Post »  
    • melbhinn
      Posted on October 5, 2011 at 5:28pm

      Coulter is an archetypal character found in every parochial xchool class: the tall, thin girl who is smarter than all the boys and can beat them up.

      Report Post »  
  • shirelover
    Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:38am

    Blaze please, please,please post a link to transcripts…there are several stories I would like to see but I can’t. It would take approximately 6 hours to watch the 8:14 minutes of this video and no, I am not exaggerating!

    I would love to know what Ann Coulter said, I guess i will have to go to another site to find it.

    Report Post » shirelover  
    • KickinBack
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 7:54am

      Are you’re plugins up to date for the vid player? Or just have a really slow computer?

      Report Post » KickinBack  
    • Exiled
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:01am

      Yes, there are still people stranded in America with only dial-up internet access.

      Report Post »  
    • IntransigentMind
      Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:04am

      Shirelover, I hear you. I have a slow internet connection too. Not everybody has broadband.

      Report Post »  
1 2 3 ... 7

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love