Ann Coulter to Glenn Beck: ‘Newt is Pompous and Boring’
- Posted on January 25, 2012 at 6:58pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
During his Wednesday morning radio broadcast, Glenn Beck and guest Ann Coulter discussed President Obama’s State of the Union address and what they consider the inexplicable rise of Newt Gingrich among his supporters and in primaries like South Carolina.
Coulter noted that even if one discounts Gingrich’s stated admiration for Franklin D. Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, “he likes amnesty for illegals, and he took $1.6 million from Freddie Mac.”
“It’s going to be very hard to beat Obama” — a point Coulter believes “should be said over and over again.”
The “Demonic” author also reminded that Republicans have only beaten incumbents twice in the last century.
Glenn and Coulter delved into Gingrich’s long history in D.C. as well as touched on a recently published caricature depicting the former House Speaker as “a little stick figure at the center of the universe,” with a “primary mission, advocate of civilization definer of civilization, teacher of the rules of civilization.”
Glenn marveled, “I don’t think the Pope describes himself as that.”
Coulter added:
“He had notes reminding himself to smile and look cuddly. And then after, you know, it all came crashing down with the ethics investigation, which was a real problem. I mean, for him to denounce it as, oh, this was just a partisan investigation, the congress and the House of Representatives was still majority Republican and there were a lot of good right wing Republicans on that committee and something like 90% of Republicans voted to reprimand Gingrich for abuse of a 501(c)(3).”
Glenn and Coulter also discussed how some Gingrich supporters are starting to behave like the more radical Ron Paul supporters Glenn has encountered. Coulter responded by saying she’s “never seen this behavior from Republicans. We normally associate it with Democrats.”
(h/t: Glenn Beck)
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 682 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 647 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 523 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 360 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 314 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 167 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 203 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 146 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Scathing New Ad Capitalizes on Rep. Ryan‘s ’Fading Obama Posters’ Remark 124 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 167 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (471)
joejoegolfn
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:29pmI’m concerned about some of the positions of Newt but you have to look at what he did while in a leadership position. As Speaker of the House he led the first balanced budgets for 4 years. He helped cut welfare and got out of the way for private business to create 11 million jobs. He shut the government down. There are a lot of people in Washington who can’t stand him. Is it because they really don’t want to cut spending or balance the budget? Is it because he shut the government down and no one noticed? They problably got scared they would lose their power. He testified against global warming, was for a mandate to beat Hilarycare alone with the Heritage foundation. Who ever the president is he is going to have to make tough decisions to save this country. I think Newt will make those tough decisions along with a REP House and Senate. We need term limits, capped balanced budget and a flat or fair tax. Romney is not willing to defend capitalism. He seems embarassed for being wealthy. Capital gains tax cut for those under 200K does no good. We don’t invest big money like the millionaires do. I will vote for who ever we nominate but Newt does not scare me. His statements about roosevelt, Wilson and FDR have not turned into policy or law—Yet.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:45pmjoejoegolfn
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:29pm
I’m concerned about some of the positions of Newt but you have to look at what he did while in a leadership position. As Speaker of the House he led the first balanced budgets for 4 years.
=========================================
“PolitiFact: Gingrich Budget, Debt Claims False
During Thursday night’s GOP presidential debate in Iowa, Newt Gingrich said, “I balanced the budget for four straight years, paid off $405 billion in debt.” The fact-checking site PolitiFact rates this claim false. “The budget was indeed balanced for four years, but it’s a stretch for him to take credit for more than two of those years,” it writes. “As for paying off $405 billion in debt, the data we found shows the debt actually increased during Gingrich’s four-year tenure as speaker by more than $800 billion.”
Report Post »http://www.drudge.com/news/151470/politifact-gingrich-budget-debt-claims
Hobbs57
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:58pmContract With America – Another con-game Gingrich played was the much-acclaimed “Contract With America,” the Republican Party’s supposed answer to big government. It turned out to be a public relations smokescreen to cover various unconstitutional measures that Congress planned to pass under Gingrich’s leadership. The Contract included a “balanced budget amendment,” which amounted to a Republican excuse to continue spending while claiming to fight for fiscal conservatism. If the government only spent money on constitutional programs, the deficit would take care of itself.
Report Post »Other areas of the Contract With America dealt with measures to reduce welfare programs and relieve tax burdens on families and businesses. That sounds good until one considers that the Constitution prohibits welfare programs and taxes that the Contract proposed only to reduce. If Gingrich had been loyal to his oath of office, he would have worked not to trim but to purge them. Ironically, but hardly surprisingly, federal spending in all the areas addressed by the 1994 Contract rose in subsequent years. Edward H. Crane, president of the Cato Institute, observed that “the combined budgets of the 95 major programs that the Contract With America promised to eliminate have increased by 13%.” Crane also pointed out, “Over the past three years the Republican-controlled Congress has approved discretionary spending that exceeded Bill Clinton’s requests by more than $30 billion.”
poverty.sucks
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 9:00pmIf Newt is pombous and boring then we should keep Obama because he is mysterious and exceptionally gifted.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 9:05pmThis is Newt Gingrich..
Report Post »http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2818630/posts Now..one of my fellow posters discovered that neither Newt nor Santorum are actually in the running for real…they were apparently not that serious and failed to file the paperwork..so they are basically irrelevant..but it does concern me that you are not vetting the candidates..you just accept Newts word when if you researched him on the web..you would find out how he has been putting it to you all these years.. I am glad to know this about Newt..Why is he even “Speaker of the House” He should be locked up in the “house”..Romney will be the same as Obama..they are all owned except for Paul..People need to wake up and vote in our Constitution and make sure that we vote in a Constituttional congress and senate..If we don’t get this done..we are over..
WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 9:07pmHELLO
We have a WINNER in Ron Paul. You may not like his foreign policy but you know he is right on when it comes to econmic issues. The other two are stats quo washington insiders.
Report Post »NeoFan
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 9:09pmIt must have been very hard for Newt to trade favors and influence to get rich on taxpayer money being that he is such a Washington outsider. Like most Christians he favors an open marriage.
Report Post »GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 9:31pmWhen is Newt going to get credit for repealing the Glass Steagall Act?
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 9:39pm@WAKEUPUSA2012
Who cares if Ron Paul has been trying to warn of the financial disaster for over 20 years.
Who cares about him predicting the bubble we are seeing now.
Who cares about being faithful to his oath to the Constitution, sometimes being the lone “no” vote because it WAS unconstitutional.
Who cares that he has been married to the same woman for over 50 years.
Who cares that he has lived an exemplary lifestyle, helping those in need for free.
Who cares about active duty military donating more to him than ALL of the others COMBINED.
Who cares about the fact that he’s the only military veteran, and served when he was called.
Not me.
I want a slicked up, draft dodging, smooth talking, pompous ass used car salesman, that will whisper all the right things in my ear.
Report Post »I want someone with more baggage than Samsonite.
I want someone who will get us into WWIII and destroy our country and economy for the next few generations.
I want someone with nice hair. Maybe a nice jawline. Their jaw line has to be better than ohmamma’s.
I want someone who can best pretend he is conservative, but under the surface is just more of the same.
I want to be lied to some more. I really like it when they lie to me, and then act like it’s not a big deal.
I want who the corrupt whoredog media says is the best for me, because I am too lazy to think for myself.
I don’t want a Constitution, or any pesky respect for the rule of law.
I don’t like to think. It’s scary.
Gerrymanderer
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 11:18pmRINO Newty will never have as much money as R-Money. He is so rich. The richest deserve to be president. I will only elect the richest man because people with the most money know how to make the most money.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 1:34amHE knew that WILSON made a death-bed apology for misguided philosophy; FDR was about governing through tough times but not everything he did; “THEY” say that REAGAN was insulted by NEWT on front page DRUDGE, yet Michael Reagan endorsed NEWT a couple of weeks ago. What I can’t stand are the MCCAIN type passive-aggressive, gutless, go along to get along jerks in DC now. WE need a tiger; a warrior. We need to get this bozo out of office before the gutless Congress turns over what’s left of governing power to them and we are in a Nazi Germany strangle-hold before we even know what happened. I’m going for NEWT…and let the East Coast Establishment be damned. They were sitting in their cocktail parties when WS turned into a craps table; when spending got insanely out of control. Time for the PATRIOTS to take a hand at steering what’s left of this ship.
Report Post »desmo118
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 2:10amThe budget was never balanced. They transferred debt from the public debt to the intra-governmental debt. That’s like paying one credit card payment with another credit card. Sure, the one credit balance goes down, but the other credit card balance goes up. The debt stays the same or in this case, went up.
Report Post »http://www.debatepolitics.com/general-political-discussion/60477-myth-clinton-surplus.html.
kathin9
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 2:44amNot concerned? The hostility that the Gas Bag Gingrich showed toward REAL CONSERVATIVES, who refused to give up their principles for the latest Gas Bag whacko idea, and compromising with the demonuts, is more than enough for me. the deafening silence from the Real Conservatives who served in the House at the same time should be RED FLAG NUMBER ONE, where are they? Not coming out in support of this self proclaimed wonder boy. The list of progressive agenda’s that he has championed especially since he left, ooooops was CASHIERED, out of his speaker’s job are frightening at the very least. his standing side by side with Nancy Pelosi on over 481 bills, explains why he was nuzzling up next to the liberal whore on the sofa, ooooops he is after all a nuzzler with many a tramp, and that would include the current “devout catholic”, excuse me while I puke, wife number 3. If you all think Obuttman is dictitorial wait until you get a load of the Progressive gas bag, liar, adulter, amnesty seeking, big gov’t, insurance mandate seeking Newt Gingrich.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 4:43am@Jefferson, I ageree with you. How people have gone this long without waking up to the gravity of the situation we are in is astounding to me. Everyone asked God to send us a person who could deliver us. He sent Ron Paul who has delivered more than 4000 babies into the world. People cried out, Please send us someone who will be honest to us, God sent Ron Paul, People cried out, Please send us someone who will not give in to the status quo, again, he sent us Ron Paul. People have cried out for a change in Washington so bad, they elected a socialist into office to make the big change. Well, the big change has been coming on for 100 years, and we are about to meet the end game, and people still do not know who to elect???? We have been under a massive progressive machine for appros. 30 years guy’s. Bush and Clinton. Over three decades with those two families in power positions in Wash. We need a person who is completely opposite of their positions. If we do not, endgame. just like Glenn has been saying. We have just one more chance to get it right or we will be paying the price through our grandchildren.
Report Post »Simonne
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 5:30amNewt scares the hell out of me & although I don’t want an Obama re-election, I still wouldn’t vote for Newt as I will go the third party route. Others will vote for Obama. I’m not usually a fan of Ann but boy is she right when it comes to Newt. Just loved her on O‘Reilly the other night as he couldn’t shut her up. She has had enough with the anti-Mitt media & so have I.
Report Post »joel228
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 6:35amThe danger of Newt is how many conservatives he’s duped.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyeB36ctO5I&feature=youtu.be
Stuck_in_CA
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 7:09am@PATTY HENRY, have we EVER seen such an all-out barrage of hit-pieces — EVER???
Report Post »One of the most viewed web sites in the world, Drudge. Some of these Newt-hater web sites should have to file FEC declarations for making donations to other candidates.
Polwatcher
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 7:20amIt is enlightening to see the establishment Rino Republicans all take sides against Newt. Now it is easy to see how the Rino’s are in league with the Rino media (including FOX) and how they have been choosing our candidates all along. All the Rino’s are trying to cram Mitt down our throat.
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 7:35amAnn Coulter on 2012 GOP Field: If Christie Doesn’t Run, Romney Will be Nominated and Lose to Obama
Report Post »2/12/11 – Here is video of Ann Coulter at CPAC today, where she was asked what she thought about the “2012 GOP playing field.” She hesitated, and then said she would just come out with what she thinks – If Chris Christie does not run, then she believes Mitt Romney will win the GOP Nomination, but lose to Obama.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vo6SOpOE788&feature=youtu.be
MYHEROISRON
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 8:20amIf you want OBAMMY to win then vote for Newt. He is everything we hope he is not! LIAR!!!
Report Post »Belzar
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 8:22amDoes anyone understand a working financial statement: Gross Sales/Revenue, Gross Profit, Net Profit? The $1.6 Mil. is Gross Revenue minus expenses; not Net Profit nor Newt’s wages or take home pay. Everyone in the media including our conservative pundits have an agenda so I think everyone has to do your own research. I think we can still disagree with certain management styles and continue to work together. I also believe in foregiveness and redemption. And, people change with age. My children have told me that I have mellowed over the years.
Report Post »Obeckian1984
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 8:24amNAFTA New World Order Newt
Report Post »Jackers
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 9:04amNewt Gingrich is PRO-amnesty like every other open-border globalist! At least Mitt Romney offers some common-sense solutions to mass illegal immigration and all of its crime-riddled ramifications by building the fence along our wide-open southern border (great shovel-ready jobs) and mandating E-Verify nationwide.
Don’t let the Neo-Cons fool you… We do not need to “deport” millions of illegal aliens or grant “amnesty.” These are two extremes. We simply need to secure our southern border, enforce all of our immigration laws, and take away the magnets such as education, health care, welfare and jobs… Illegal aliens will then return home of their own accord.
I’m tired of our lawmakers rewarding lawbreakers at law-abiders’ expense. I’m tired of our so-called “Public Servants” ignoring the majority will and best interests of the public – the American people… The overwhelming majority of the American people have consistently opposed amnesty of any sort.
NO to amnesty; NO to Newt!
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 9:05amA friend called last night and told me that the Tea Party has been looking at Ron Paul..and that there the people are starting to look at his economic policies and saying…YES…this is what our country needs.!!! Newt is not in the running people…I have heard Newt speak and he is a great speaker..but he is a snake oil salesman..If you look at Newt’s record http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2818630/posts You will see how much he has deluded you.. Our country is going into collapse…do you understand what that means? It means Marshall Law ..We will be policed by the UN and the Navy Seal “best shot” is holding sniper lessons for our police forces.. It means that our dolllar means nothing..you will starve. Can you imagine the Kaos.? .No military..a complete Communist takeover with their Muslim military.. sounds cozy doesn’t it.?.You guys had better wake up..This is one guy that we had all better get behind..It has been exposed what these politicians do behind closed doors..The joke has been on us..Let’s vote the Constitutionalist..Santorum and Newt aren’t legitimately in the race.. Open your eyes..Ron Paul for President….Bring back our Constitution.!!!
Report Post »JRook
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 9:15amIf GB is gonna start being the showcase for Ann Coulter he must really be in trouble. Ann Coulter should come out of the cheap seats once and actually do something besides being a loud mouth, irrelevant critic.
Report Post »lillymckim
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 9:21amOh look.. yet another on Fox employee pushing Romney down our throats …so “Democrat” of you Ann.
Don’t you have another book to sell please stop telling us who we can vote for.
Report Post »lillymckim
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 9:35amIf Ann keeps this up she will run herself out of the market… tread lightly Ann
Report Post »ltb
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 9:37amAnn is pompous and boring. It’s a shame, I used to like her.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 10:03amOnce again we are on a thread about a GOP candidate that actually has a chance of beating Obama and again the Ron Paul folks want to talk about a man that never accomplished anything in his 35 years of government.
Report Post »I would politely ask all of you Ron Paul supporters to keep your comments about Paul confined to postings that concern Ron Paul. My reasons are evident, but I will state one more time for the record… Ron Paul has a ZERO chance of winning the primary!
Jefferson
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 10:35am@PseudoPatriotDave
You’re such a bleeding moron, I don’t even know where to begin.
First of all, I’ll refer to whatever subject I want to on whichever thread I want to.
Secondly, just because Ron Paul voted in accordance with the Constitution EVERY time, and the REST of CONgress (who BTW has an 11% approval rating) didn’t, DOES NOT mean that Ron Paul didn’t “accomplish anything.”
HE accomplished being FAITHFUL to the OATH HE SWORE to UPHOLD the Constitution, while most of the rest DID NOT.
Is that simple enough for you to understand, Dave?
Also, Ron Paul is the ONLY one who polls right up there with Romney in a head to head against ohmamma. You obviously don’t realize that, because you most likely just watch Fox News to get your idiotic view of the world.
Finally, we’ll see who has the unbound DELEGATES at the end of the process, which you obviously don’t understand. Try breathing through your nose a little more. It might get some oxygen to that walnut sized brain of yours, you ******* mouth breather.
Report Post »BoiseBaked
Posted on January 27, 2012 at 4:38amI‘m concerned about Newt’s ego. It always arrives 10 minutes before he does.
Report Post »Nathen
Posted on January 27, 2012 at 9:40amGingrich did not balance a budget in the 90s. All they did was pay off debt using Social Security funds.
Report Post »jjrn13
Posted on January 27, 2012 at 1:25pmHummm, “pompous and boring,” for a minute there, thought Ann was talking about herself. May I remind Ms. Coulter her CPAP statement: “Romney will win the candidacy and lose to Barack Obama.” Quite correct. A Partisan Attack on Gingrich years ago? Oh you bet it was…most of us knew little about Nancy Pelosi back then, but we sure do know her well now. Gingrich’s accomplishments Gingrich were nothing short of stunning, racking up one major advancement after another, no wonder Pelosi had every claw out for him, Shame, his fellow Republicans running scared put a knife in his back trying to save their own skins. Had they rallied behind him, it would have ended very differently.
Report Post »jjrn13
Posted on January 27, 2012 at 1:37pmPatty Henry, you are exactly right. NO first lady had ever been more protective of president than Nancy Reagan…both are supporting Gingrich, who went to such extraordinary means backing Reagan, almost crazy. Spending years standing alone in the well of congress after all members left for the day…but the CNN cameras still running, addressing one anti reagan assertion after another.Absolute dedication. Love your description of “passive aggressive RINO’s” .. Romney asked if Obama is a socialist, replied what a nice guy he is. Gingrich asked same question said, “no, his ideology more Marxist like. You better believe, against Obama, Romney will turn 100% wuss. Gingrich will decimate him.
Report Post »kscottie
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:29pmThe same ANN COULTER who had a snark fest with Laura Ingraham calling SARAH PALIN the republican Obama.
The same ANN COULTER who tried and tried to get Crispy Creme Christie to run . and now she supports who Christie supports.
Ann is the part of the party elitists that looks down on the little republicans/conservatives. Because SC went for NEWT, she insulted the entire state.
She mocked folks who go “ usa usa usa” ….really why?
She said we’re idiots who just want to see lob insults at OBAMA in the debate….
YEAH!!!! EXACTLY, we wanna see someone WIPE THE FLOOR with NOBAMA while articulating why he’s a failure and why conservatism works.
Glenn has so much trouble undesrtanding…its very simple Glenn, Romney is wooden has yet to do anything well in the debates…hes in a holding pattern. Santorum is just slightly better.
NEWT can Bring it. he isn’t my guy , but He’s just damn good at going after Obama.
You think Newt won’t get that pipeline, he won’t go after Iran, he won’t support israel?…Grow up. Beating Obama is the only way we get to the first step of turning things around.
Report Post »kscottie
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:35pmand BTW, WHY is it that SCott Brown, when he won, most folks said ” its great, but in his neck of the wooods being a republican is the equivalent of a MODERATE DEM. ” But MITT isn’t?
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:48pmRight, Newt will “wipe the floor” with Obama in a debate (as far as conservatives are concerned), then lose in a landslide. Do you really think Obama is going to walk into a debate with Newt unless he makes sure 75% of the audience supports him? He is well aware that it is his strong point, and he will be prepared for it.
You also have to remember that the other half of the country is not the same audience as that crowd in SC.
Think about how easy the ad campaign against Newt will be. Spend one third of it making Newt look evil (easy), one third of it saying the economy is doing swimmingly (they’re doing that already), and the last third blaming the Republican Congress, which has descended into wicked, corrupt perniciousness (exemplified by their evil leader, Newt). Spend $1 billion in the battleground states doing that, slam dunk for Obama.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:55pm“its great, but in his neck of the wooods being a republican is the equivalent of a MODERATE DEM. ” But MITT isn’t?”
It is sad that “moderate” has become a dirty word. Next, you’ll see words like “reasonable” and “understanding” become profanities.
Report Post »Jayk Signal
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:01pmThanks to Ann, I’ve learned to endure a lot of heat defending political flame-throwers.
Now she’s telling me true conservatives are demure, speak in measured tones, and seek the approval of independents foremost.
Huh?
Report Post »FranciscoDAnconia
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:21pmAre you physically challenged? There is only going to be 2-3 debates. It doesn’t matter how good of a debater he is because the Obama regime will destroy his credibility.
Report Post »PresidentDowngrade
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:22pmAnn is morphing into Nancy Pelosi. Please stop publishing articles about her. Ann a little advice, get the adams apple removed.
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:25pmThe Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend.
That should be all you need to know. Ann Coulter is not a Newt Gingrich Fan so Glenn had her on to do some Gingrich Bashing.
Lets Review
Ann Coulter acted like a 13 year old girl about Chris Christie When he did not run
Ann Coulter acted like a 13 year old girl about Mitt Romney When that did not help him in the polls
Ann Coulter acted like a 42 year old exwife and started S M E A R I N G Newt Gingrich
That is when Glenn Beck got a crush on her.
“Show me your friends and I will show you your Future” Glenn Beck
Anti Gingrich Friends
Glenn Beck
Report Post »Pat Gray
Stu-pid
Bill Clinton
Hilary Clinton
Nancy Pelosi
Al Sharpton
Jessey Jackson
Karl Rove
John McCain
Ann Coulter
Bob Beckel
Juan WIlliams
John Kerry
Al Gore
Gov. Christ FLA
George Bush
Chris Christie
George Soros
Harry Reid
kscottie
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:25pm@FREEDOMPURVEYOR
“You also have to remember that the other half of the country is not the same audience as that crowd in SC.”
Actually, I believe that other than Hollywood, New York and Chicago, A GOOD majority of the US is like SC. I beleive they see how far in the toilet we’re going and realism has set in. Its UNREALISTIC to think that if MITT can even beat Newt or JOHN MCCAIN, then , gven the conditions you just set , then he wouldn’t last againstNOBAMA.
NEWT is teflon–the adultery hasn’t stuck, the wislsonian, and andrew jackson talks hasn’t stuck, the Nancy pelosi ad hasn’t stuck……WHY?
Becaause people beleive AT THE VERY LEAST, NEWT has the Fire and can DEBATE . Santorum did BETTER, but he’s still wooden and in the teens.
I personally wanted the best guy ( Gal ) we could get …..but our choices were weeded out. NOW we have to think strategically , realistically…I DON”T LIKE IT, but IOWA and NH have weeded the others out.
Report Post »Montereyzman
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:27pmDitto !!! Ditto !!! Ditto !!!
Report Post »kscottie
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:30pm@FRANCISCODANWHATEVERYOURNAMEIS
Aare you mentally challenged?
HOW exactly are people gonna rate NEWT vs OBAMA unless they see the debates…?
IF you’re implying that its just money for Ads..then quit right now, Obama has already won.
All it takes is one or two and the independents will see him DESTROY NOBAMA.
HOW EXACTLY DID REAGAN WIN AGAINST CARTER?
Report Post »JustMel71
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:39pmGlenn Beck knows exactly what is going on, do you? Now here’s your chance to find out. Glenn Beck stated back in Jan. 2010 (possible date, according to the article) that it is Mitt Romney’s turn to be nominated in 2012 according to precedent of the GOP.
http://gop12.thehill.com/2010/01/beck-its-mitt-romneys-turn.html
FYI, Mr. Spooky Dude Soros said that there would be no difference in Wall Street with either Romney or Obama.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyftC27vNp0
Report Post »kscottie
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:42pmLET ME PUT IT ANOTHER WAY….
if you believe anything that Glenn, Rush, Levin, ETC that theres some part of NOBAMA thats secretly UBER-SOCIALIST, then
Another term for NOBAMA = a man whos policies that will drive us off the cliff because he has nothing to lose…NOTHING TO LOSE. 4….MORE ….YEARS. Of ERIC HOLDER, the current DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND AND ITS POLICIES…etc
A term for NEWT, or whoever = a halt to those policies, a slowing of the destruction of the country, a chance for supporting ISRAEL, The pipeline, a possible majority for the Conservatives and at LEAST A CHANCE of turning some of this around.
I know what choice I’d make.
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 9:13pmI find it very interesting and revealing that every single messenger who delivers the message about Newt the PIG Gingrich, is discounted and called a non-republican. Meanwhile, Newt is thee biggest progressive probably in the entire Republican Party, with Graham of South Carolina being a close second.
Report Post »What I find mind boggling, is after this entire revolution and evolution of the Tea Party, after all Glenn, GBTV, and theBlaze has done to teach us about Progressives, You people haven’t learned a darned thing. Newt is the Progressive pig in shining armor. I mean really people, this is how it all began, what it is all about. Mitt is a moderate, but he is NOT a progressive. BIG difference. Mitt hasn’t even lived a life that would introduce him to the ability of being a progressive.
I tell ya, the only thing I can consider, and I really hate to believe what the left has been saying all these years, and I have been defending the party, but there are a great number of BIGOTS on the right. South Carolina being the pure evidence of this, not to mention my personal experience on countless occasions at AA and NA meetings as “Born Agains” scream at me never hearing a word about what I have to say about the trinity and my personal beliefs. Heck, mention Mormons and they look as if they are looking for their bottle of holy water, wooden stakes and garlic.
As far as Newt, just when I think the guy couldn’t get any worse, I find more grime on him.
Joey8
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 9:24pmMan, I miss the paulbots. They were more entertaining than the newtbots. Nothing he has done or has said or will do or will say will change their mind. This isn’t about voting on principle, it’s about who will win a mud-slinging fight against obama. It has nothing to do with who will be the best leader for our country, the best commander-in-chief of the military, its about who will debate better. Embarrassing to read the comments here.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 9:25pmFreedomPurveyor moderately sucking **** is still sucking ****, moderately packing fudge is still packing fudge, these moderate ******** you worship are only moderate that they ware a condom while they rape our nation, while any true liberal rapes your bareback.
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 9:45pmSo, Ann, what are you? I find you a bit boring. You won’t answer questions and continually brush your hair off your face, and make me nervous with all the giggling and no replies.
Report Post »I find Newt pompous and self assured and exciting the way he answers question rather than hem/haw around the questions. He’s answered the ethics questions to my satisfaction, I even looked it up on the internet and think you and Romney are lying about the whole episode. He was never charged and found clean by the IRS and the ethics committee.
booger71
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 10:16pmShe is an overly skinny blonde skank
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 11:08pm@ Heinz 57
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMcjJEXt9To
Mitt Romney 2002 “ My views are Progressive ”
at 57 seconds what does Romney say???
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 11:27pm“moderately sucking **** is still sucking ****, moderately packing fudge is still packing fudge, these moderate ******** you worship are only moderate that they ware a condom while they rape our nation, while any true liberal rapes your bareback.”
If you’re saying a moderate conservative is “moderately packing fudge,” then what is the more extreme alternative? Your analogy seems a little confusing.
Report Post »bbhouston
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 11:47pmWell said Ks…..
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 1:40am@ MS-Glennbc
Report Post »Addition for your list:
“Chuck Stein” and all the Republicans he knows
PATTY HENRY
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 1:48amBRAVO KSOTTIE…. 100% on the mark. YOU nailed it. I hope everyone reads it. YOU speak the TRUTH and you speak intelligence. Ann has been as silly on this as she was about CHRISTIE…. WHO KNOWS what’s up with her. I love the long list of NEWT enemies…if that doesn’t cause Patriots to want to support and vote for him, I don’t know what will! I hope he does very well tomorrow night, because I don‘t see a dime’s difference between ROMNEY and (UGH) MCCAIN!
Report Post »kscottie
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 8:11amBTW, my apologies for the various typos in my posts…..its been a long night.
Report Post »Belzar
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 8:31amModerate to a Libertarian means Progressive.
Report Post »fldammy
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 9:47pmNewt is another big government socialist. I use to like him until Tom DeLay was on Rush‘s show several years ago and he talked about what it was like being under Newt’s leadership. After that, I hoped Newt would never run for POTUS. No, I’m not voting for Mitt either, I’ll hold my nose and vote for Rick on Tuesday. Good thing 2012 doesn’t matter, 2016/2020 is going to be the make or break for the USA’s next hundred or so years as we rebuild from the upcoming financial cataclysm.
Report Post »FreeManWalking
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:26pmAnn has become the “dickweed”, like beck she has become irrelevant.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:45pmI really dont know what has happened to both of them. It’s incredible how they have slipped from Conservatism…
Report Post »Republic
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:04pmAnn began to lose my attention when I listened to her over the last several years push her neocon agenda. Then I really lost it with her when she pushed Crispy Cream and then that Milquetoast Romney. Based on their responses to issues, the only person running that I am even interested in supporting in the field of candidates is Ron Paul, but the MSM is very intent on locking him out, which really reduces his chances of being the Republican nominee.
Report Post »ThankBabyJesus
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:24pmreverse psychology I believe.
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:43pmCoulter is dead on, and you folks are voting according to your feelings. Romney is the answer. Get to know him better. Really investigate whether his statements and record actually paints him as the least conservative ( BTW it doesn’t). Gingrich will fall flat on his face and so will this party if we put him up to the job. His own mouth will compel the American Public to run towards Obama. It won’t matter how well worded his insults are. It won’t matter how well worded his flattery is. It won’t matter because in the end neither will Newt. He is cheating with us against all the political ideology he used to be married to. He is unfaithful, and you are duped. No reasonable conservative should be willing to have Newt as a bedfellow and most of America will feel the same way. Obama will be seen as the “sane” choice, and we will proceed forward and over the cliff.
Report Post »Ailina
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 4:34amThey both had the opportunity to have a voice..and gather followers. That empowerment also made them mega bucks..The love of money is the root of all evil.
Evil is made possible by the sanction you give it. Withdraw your sanction.
Report Post »Rightallalong
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 9:07amIf any one acts like the Democrats in terms of their radical statements its ANN C. I am not a Newty fan at all but for her who is a Chrissy Christi, Progressive Lover I think she has become a mouth piece for the establishment. As much as I keep seeing elitest establishment republicans slam Newty the more I think well maybe he is the only one that will change things…Then I remember his BIG Government record and his stand with the Progressives and I relaize there is a split between the Republican Progressives…
Quite frankly we do not have a conservative party in the US anymore … we are so screwed!
Report Post »fldammy
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 9:48pmThen why are you bother to post here, less your just a sad troll looking for attention?
Report Post »LonJ
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:24pmLean about the real newt! http://www.nysun.com/opinion/william-jefferson-gingrich/87674/
Report Post »whereareyourbrains
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:32pmGood article…so biased……..a lot sound plausible………I wish he were perfect……….but he is not……….He did not leave in shame………….another untruth………I lived that era…They counted on him to get Clinton impreaced…he didn’t succeed………oh well…………another life another day.. Who ever wins…………….they have my vote……..
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:32pmA opinion ….with nothing to back it up. Nice
Report Post »FreeManWalking
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:38pmhttp://www.therightscoop.com/must-read-the-truth-about-gingrich-ethics-case/
If you can handle the truth about the Ethics Charges.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 9:02pmThe IRS concluded the course simply was not political. “The central problem in arguing that the Progress and Freedom Foundation provided more than incidental private benefit to Mr. Gingrich, GOPAC, and other Republican entities,” the IRS wrote, “was that the content of the ‘Renewing American Civilization’ course was educational…and not biased toward any of those who were supposed to be benefited.”
The bottom line: Gingrich acted properly and violated no laws. There was no tax fraud scheme. Of course, by that time, Gingrich was out of office, widely presumed to be guilty of something, and his career in politics was (seemingly) over.
Report Post »whereareyourbrains
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:23pmSounds like………….If Mitt loses you won’t vote for Newt. Sounds like if Newt loses ………you won’t vote for Mitt. I do know one thing………..whoever it is………..I will swallow my pride and suck it up and vote for whoever we pick as Obummers opponent…………….I hope all you complainers feel the same way……if not…………..say hello to Obama for the next decade………he will control more than four more years. You will give him the ultimate power he needs………to take over American and put his flag up instead…………………Hitler wins…
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:29pmWe should probably be concentrating on replacing our representatives, who are the only ones that can keep the executive branch in check.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:29pm@whereareyourbrains
Amen!!!!!!
Report Post »mattmo79
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:21pmAnne needs to look into a mirror and reflect on the outrageous things she says!! She’s acting exactly like GOP elitist!!
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:33pmI have noticed Ann is full of her own self importance.
Report Post »BS61
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 9:00amI‘m sad that she was on Glenn’s show – I really dislike her!
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:20pmFunny that they cut off Pat’s Freudian slip saying that Mitt was the most conservative that can win. Yeah really behind Santorum there.
Report Post »The-Real-Enrico
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:32pmI really don‘t like or trust Pat’s politics. I don’t care about anything he says politically. But I do find humorist and is good for a laugh some times.
He seems to have too much of a problem with Ron Paul and libertarians for me.
Report Post »DiamondDog
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:20pmI use to be a fan of Coulter and those days are over! The Dems and Republican elite hate Newt. He sounds like the right man for the job to me. I was leaning toward Romney but not anymore. The more they push. The more they push me toward Newt.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:31pmSeems to me that the establishment is backing Newt pretty hard right now. I know Rush Limbaugh wants to act like he is a fresh populist Tea Party conservative, but to me he represents the establishment.
Report Post »texrubarts
Posted on January 27, 2012 at 12:21amYou are correct Ann is getting Newt some votes. I am voting for Newt !!! GOP machine is against Newt so that tells me – VOTE 4 Newt….
Report Post »momprayn
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:17pmUsed to be a Ann Coulter fan – but then found out she usually has liberal boyfriends and now this re Newt…..a little over the top — I thought she‘d start hyperventilating on O’Reilly (or Hannity – don’t remember) about him. Repubs. acting weird? How about her and Glenn, even though I’ve been a fan of his too. She evidently has past dislikes about Newt and she almost worships Romney.
Report Post »I loved her book “Demonic” and I agree with many witty things she says about liberals but believe she’s way too much out there on this one. Afraid both she and Glenn are losing fans……………..
AOL_REFUGEE
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:24pmWhat is this, some kind of a Glenn/Coulter love fest as they distort the truth together?
THIS is the behavior “we normally associate it with Democrats,” Ann. And Glenn.
Report Post »NarnianWarrior
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:25pmThank you for such wise observations on Ann and Glenn. They are losing it, aren’t they?
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:37pmI‘m glad they’re sticking to their principles, regardless of what their fans think. You don‘t change anyone’s mind by bending your beliefs to fit what they want to hear.
Glenn is more right on this one than he has ever been. Newt is a dirty, stinkin’ progressive and he hides it behind a “Reagan conservative” facade. Just sayin’.
Report Post »onetruepatriot
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:58pmRight. There was a time when Ann Coulter wouldn’t give Glenn Beck the time of day. Now all of a sudden they’re cozying up on the couch together bash Newt??
Am I in the f$%^#@g Twilight Zone or what?
Report Post »whereareyourbrains
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:17pmI am glad she thinks he cuddly…that smile must be working Newt. Keep it up. The upper class just do not like Newt. I am the below middle class……………….I like Newt and all his baggage……It wear better on him………..than it wears on Mitt…………Obama fears Newt. Pelosi fears Newt….the RNC fear Newt……..that is good enough for me…..
Report Post »VotingMama
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 10:02pmlmao, Obama and Pelosi don’t fear Newt . . . they would jump for joy if he became the nominee. Notice who the DNC is putting out ads against in Florida. Notice who the DNC is focusing all their energy on in Florida, even putting out pamphlets against. It’s not Newt. It’s Mitt Romney who is getting and keeping all of their attention. Mitt is who they fear in the general. Mitt will be the hardest to ridicule and Mitt will make this race about Obama, not himself. Newt would make the race about Newt. Besides that, Newt has a 27% approval rating . . . lower than Obama’s! This and the fact that Newt is highly erratic and undisciplined make for a losing combination. Mitt also has much better campaign organization and money for the long haul. Mitt proves the most formidable.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:15pmPot meet kettle.
Report Post »MONIFICENT
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:15pmIf this guy is the G.O.P nominee I will not vote. No longer will i pick for the lessor of to evils. Seriously there is no way this guy should even be running for president let alone leading any race unless it one for the biggest hypocrite.
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:21pmYou have ALWAYS and you will ALWAYS vote for the lesser of two evils
Report Post »Scarybones
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:13pmI would rather have a loud and uncouth leader who gets things done than the current appeaser and chief.
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:19pmI’d rather have Romney who gets things done like a CEO… If you were the owner of a company and hiring someone to fix your economic mess, would you pick the guy who was fired for ethical problems or the guy who ran Bain Capital and made millions?
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 9:58pmThe two issues of this campaign will clearly be Obamacare and job creation. Romney loses on both – he created the model for Obamacare, and his job creation record is extraordinarily spotty. The best argument he can make about Obama is the one he’s been making: that Obama is incompetent, that he has “amassed an actual record of debt, decline and disappointment.” It’s a good argument. It’s just not a winning argument. Kerry tried the same argument in 2004; Dole tried the same argument in 1996. Defining Obama as incompetent won’t cut it, because in fact, he is extremely competent – at achieving far-left goals.
Report Post »Want to know Obama’s counterargument? If this campaign gets bogged down in the details of whether a recovery is actually taking place, even as Obama defines Romney as an out-of-touch richy-rich guy, Obama will win.
It will be significantly more difficult for Obama to craft a narrative about Newt. Obama can’t attack Newt on lobbying – Obama’s stacked his administration with lobbyists, and he was the #2 recipient of Fannie/Freddie money in the Senate. He can’t attack Newt on job creation – if Obama wants to argue Gingrich era job creation vs. Obama era job creation, good luck to him. He can’t attack Newt as an elitist – they’re both professors. The “crazy old coot” argument. If Newt can avoid that pitfall, he can maintain his image as the “big idea guy” who worked with and against Clinton to create massive economic grow
SHOWMESTATEGUY
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 10:17pm@ BABEUF————-
Keep talking, you are making sense!
Report Post »neocon1
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:12pmSorry Ann, but have LOST me as a fan.
Report Post »carbonyes
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:03pmAnn use to engender some respect from me in spite of her big mouth, which she has always had. She still has a big mouth, but what comes out of it, has all too frequently gotten off track, she hammers on Gingrich, but her lover boy Chris Christie, whom she was trumpeting as a potential Presidential candidate, is in no way conservative and far to the left of Gingrich, who is not a RINO and has potential despite some of his other issues. In other words, Ms. Coulter goes off on her own tangent, and everyone is suppose to Agree with her because she takes a certain position. Sounds like she has some of the same egoism issues that she complains about Gingrich having, and Glenn goes right along with her because he has a destroy Newt Gingrich vendetta, Both her and Glenn are definitely off track.
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:12pmATTENTION ALL BECKBOTS
I heard a bot on Rush today and he said he couldn’t vote for Newt because he had an affair and was divorced but he could vote for Mittens who was in favor of murdering children. One of you guys care to explain that?????????????
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:28pmI watch Glenn Beck and I hate them all (candidates). I don’t blindly follow any politician, nor do I blindly agree with GB all the time.
Sincerely,
Report Post »A gay “Beckbot”
MSGT
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:39pm@ UBE
Well than clearly I’m not talking to you. Looking for the bots that agree with the caller
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:49pmConservative radio man Rush Limbaugh is taking a fourth stab at marriage with a weekend wedding to Kathryn Rogers, an events coordinator 26 years his junior, according to various reports. Limbaugh, 59, will reportedly marry the 33-year-old Rogers at his Palm Beach compound. . . . The childless Limbaugh’s first two marriages were over by the time he rose to national prominence.
Report Post »I guess he doesn’t like children!
MSGT
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:58pmLet’s focus people
Report Post »bikerr
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:22pm@MSGT—I’m not a beckbot but…..You can’t reverse an affair or a divorce,but you can change your mind(or heart) on what you call murdering of children. I think your talking about abortion?. Remember Reagan was once a Democrat from Holloywood! and divorced.
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:43pm@ BIKR
You can’t reverse an affair or a divorce,but you can change your mind(or heart) on what you call murdering of children.
—————————————
Apples and eye drops. If changing your heart brings that dead kid back you may have a point but even then, not really
Focus, I know some of you bots are wanting to explain this to me.
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 11:30pmLook, this board sucks for back and forth debate. They set it up for comments not debate so I’ve been waiting for one of the moral bots to explain this to me……….
*crickets*
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 7:46am*tumbleweed*
Report Post »Rob
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:11pmWhen Republicans go after Republicans I can only say this……buck fou.
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:13pmyeah, but Newt Gingrich has been going after republicans ever since Reagan.
Report Post »rinnyroo
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:32pm@ rob
this is what newt said….. why nominate the man who couldn‘t beat the man who couldn’t beat obama………………… right on newt !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and anyone the media or the elite rep. good old boy club is afraid of along with pelosi has my vote…period
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:09pmGingrich: The SOB we need
Exclusive: Pamela Geller cheers Newt’s understanding of Islamic threat
Newt Gingrich’s victory in Saturday’s South Carolina primary means that we are still alive.
Gingrich really won the primary in the first five minutes of Friday night’s debate, when he challenged John King of CNN. King opened the debate trying to press forward the media’s campaign of destruction of Gingrich, using the 13-year-old slings and arrows of a still-bitter ex-wife. The best thing about the exchange was that Newt turned the tables with the speed and skill of a black belt and put the media on the defensive. It was brilliant, a defining moment. And the crowd cheered. People are fed up…
Report Post »http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/gingrich-the-sob-we-need/
KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:22pmNo thanks…..
That‘d be like inviting a burglar back into my home for a 2nd time after he’s already robbed me once before:
————————————————————————
“Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich touted the virtues of Freddie Mac’s business model in an interview published by the company in April 2007, remarks that contrast with the candidate’s recent statements that he had warned the company of impending financial disaster.
The interview was featured on Freddie Mac’s website for several months in 2007 when he was a paid consultant to the company and Freddie Mac was struggling to address mounting financial problems as the housing boom was turning to bust. ”
Report Post »http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204012004577072502921422584.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
fatjack
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:08pmStuck_in_CA
Thanks for the link. A very good read.
Report Post »SHOWMESTATEGUY
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:09pmAnn———–
Your opinion is just that. Your opinion. But don‘t be insulting to others that don’t agree with your opinion. Makes you look like a dem lib wannabe.
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:10pmGingrich: The SOB we need
Exclusive: Pamela Geller cheers Newt’s understanding of Islamic threat
Newt Gingrich’s victory in Saturday’s South Carolina primary means that we are still alive.
Gingrich really won the primary in the first five minutes of Friday night’s debate, when he challenged John King of CNN. King opened the debate trying to press forward the media’s campaign of destruction of Gingrich, using the 13-year-old slings and arrows of a still-bitter ex-wife. The best thing about the exchange was that Newt turned the tables with the speed and skill of a black belt and put the media on the defensive. It was brilliant, a defining moment. And the crowd cheered. People are fed up.
Report Post »http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/gingrich-the-sob-we-need/
MSGT
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:17pmThat’s what Beck does. Call in and disagree. They will gang up and shout you down.
Report Post »The-Real-Enrico
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:24pmI don‘t like Gingrich and I can’t stand Anne. I don’t want to have to support Newt as our candidate. He is not our only chance of beating Obama, that goes for Romney too. Santorum or Paul 2012 please!
Oh yeah and boring? Really? I don‘t trust or like Newt as a conservative but he easily the most entertaining person that I’ve seem running for office. I can’t get enough of the slime sticking it to the media.
Report Post »GWest
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:08pmIf you think Newton Gingrich is awesome but Bill Clinton is a douche, you are just like the Media that thinks Bill Clinton is awesome and Newton Gingrich is a douche.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:18pmNewt didn’t do it in the oval office on our dime……
Report Post »FreeManWalking
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:31pmHe wasn’t lying under oath to a Grand Jury to beat a Rape case either.
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:08pmAnn finally got something right; The popular opinion of Newt IS that he is pompous and boring.
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:16pmThat explains the standing ovations
Report Post »Montereyzman
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:08pm“never seen this behavior from Republicans. We normally associate it with Democrats.”
That’s what your former fans of both of you two are saying about you NOW !!!
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:07pmNewt is always there when the democrats really need him… nancy polosi global warming commercial in the middle of the global warming email scandal, cheating on his second wife during clinton scandal, bashing reagan during a democrat assault, bashing the Ryan Plan… etc. etc.
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:17pmROMNEY / RUBIO 2012 – this is a ticket that would sell nationwide!!!
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:19pmRight on brotha!
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:26pmROMNEY cant win his party over and he has been running for 7yrs ……..tell me, what make you think he will sell nationally? He couldn‘t even beat McDillweed that couldn’t beat BO
Report Post »rinnyroo
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:28pm@p8riot newt /west 2012
allen west just said if he was asked to run as a v.p. he would…. and west backs newt… god and he just said the other day about obama , ” i can’t stand the guy”…love it
Report Post »rinnyroo
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:29pm@p8riot.. well this is what newt say’s… why nominate the man who couldn’t beat the man who obama beat…right on newt !!!!
Report Post »NoNannyState4me
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:06pmAnne Coulter looks like the creepy old preacher in ‘Poltergeist’ with a long blond wig on.
http://publisher.chillertv.com/assets/poltergeist_kane_455×200_131974776692.jpg
Report Post »NHwinter
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:06pmEnough of the Newt bashing. Really tired of it. Time to support whoever gets nominated. Anyone is better than Obama.
Report Post »The Scarecrow
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 8:55pmThe lesser of two evils is still evil.
Report Post »Steverino
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:05pmAnn is ALWAYS worth a listen. And a look.
Report Post »Or two.
Steve
Rob
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 7:12pmIf you like boys…..
Report Post »floridacockleburr
Posted on January 25, 2012 at 11:10pmThat’s cause you have to look twice to even see her.
Report Post »