Anthony Weiner Mocks Michelle Bachmann and Rep. Kelly During ‘Face the Nation’
- Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:05am by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
Anthony Weiner pulled an Anthony Weiner.
On a CBS “Face the Nation” segment on Sunday, the fiery Democratic Rep. from New York known for his lapses in decorum lived up to his reputation while talking opposite Republican Reps. Michelle Bachmann (MN) and Mike Kelly (PA). Besides yelling and talking over others, Wiener even took some pot shots at his colleagues.
“Apparently my Republican friends believe the tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires – somehow the bill fairy pays for that,” he said at one point, and then sarcastically told Kelly he hopes the newly-elected Rep. has “more respect for his constituents.”
The disrespectful tone rubbed off on Weiner’s Democratic colleague Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She too took a cheap shot at Bachmann when she said everyone needs to “go beyond rehetoric,“ and ”Going beyond campaign slogans which is all I’ve heard today from Mr. Kelly and is all Ms. Bachmann really ever engages in.”
Mediaite cut the explosive part of the segment directly below, with the full 15 minute clip after that:
Weiner pulled a similar stunt, including the sarcasm and eye rolls, with Fox News’s Megyn Kelly.




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (324)
liesnomore
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 9:00amAnytime this clown starts spilling that bilge one shoulds simply remind him that after a 1.8 Trillion dollar deficit in one year; neither he nor his party has any credibility to say one single word about fiscal responsibility. Not ever.
Report Post »abc
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 4:32pmFor the record, Bush’s deficits doubled in the final year of his Presidency. Why? Because the severe recession caused the government to start writing a lot of unemployment checks and other automatic stabilizers at the same time that tax revenues declined due to lower economic activity. The deficit nearly doubled again in ‘09 even though Obama’s budget did not control any of that year. So the biggest hikes in the deficit occurred under budgets that were signed by Bush, yet you blame Obama. And, in the context of the size of the deficits, even the entire stimulus package is dwarfed in size. Never mind that you ignore that most intelligent Republicans were in favor of the TARP and stimulus plans and the honest ones (e.g., Charlie Munger) defend it to this day, while others (e.g., Dick Cheney) were in favor publicly then and privately now. You have totally rewritten economic history, misplaced blame for the deficits and showed a lack of understanding of economics, the budget and a host of other issues. You have little credibility, in light of this, to make any comments on the subject that would be read, much less respected, by intelligent, informed people. Thanks for playing. Better luck next time…
Report Post »MaybeTheDingoAteYourBaby
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 5:05pm@ABC – Bush‘s dificit’s? Are you kidding me, everyone knows that the Dems had control of both houses in the last 2 years of Bush’s Presidency. Thanks for playing.
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 2:57am@ ABC ….The self proclaimed expert …. hahahahahahaha …. your type is a very interesting one. I am dedicating an entire chapter of my book to the likes of the one who is so smart, he can even to prove it. I bet your Mom is PO’d today, as it had to take you all day to post 100 times here on Glenn Beck’s theBlaze, you probably missed dinner. hahahahahaha you really are a trip man .. I will give you that. The only thing I can’t seem to figure out, is why one who is so smart as you would be wasting your time here and not writing a book.I mean, you stumped a man with a Ph.D in economics from Stanford, don’t you think you are wasting your time here ??? I mean, your half-truths are presented so well, I bet you could get quite a few people to really believe you know what you were talking about. Those of us on here speak in terms of wisdom, so we can’t appreciate your great knowledge, but I know there are many intellect‘s in the Oblahblah administration who don’t know a darn thing about the reality of life and I bet my last dollar they would believe your B.S. It is really good. Unless of course, it is your life dream to become King of the entire World of Warcraft, which is certainly more prestigious …. hahahaha
Report Post »starlitepark
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 5:04amABC–
The Dems were running Congress the final two years of Bush’s presidency and thus controlled the purse strings and spending. If spending was out of control then, they were a huge part of that.
The ‘09 budget was stalled by the Democrats at the end of ’08 (including Obama as a still-then Senator) until the next Congress (111th — with a wider Dem majority) so they could take it out of Bush’s purview and add even more pet projects and tons of pork).
Similiarly, they also shirked their responsibility at the end of last year (’10) and punted the ‘11 budget by merely approving a ’continuing resolution’ to avoid being held accountable for another huge budget before the last mid-term election.
Looks like your credibility is also ‘in question’ when you leave out important facts like these.
Report Post »abc
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 9:09amMaybe and Starlite, I’m not sure what planet you are living on, but here on Earth the numbers will show that the big increases in the deficit related to expenditures to counter the recession. These are called automatic stabilizers by economists since they are not voted on by Congress but automatically deploy in response to unemployment rising. To blame any Congress–GOP or Democrat–for this is to reveal colossal stupidity on your part. My point in raising the deficit‘s doubling in Bush’s final year is not to indict Bush–the knee jerk reaction you would have since you only see things in fake partisan terms rather than in terms that comport with reality, which is not your fault but that of people like Beck who make money encouraging you to think so poorly–but rather, it was to highlight that you cannot ignorantly look at the deficit numbers in a vacuum. You need to understand the context to see where the spending problem lies, as opposed to rational responses to dire circumstances. If you see 1,000 US soldiers die in peacetime, that should be a graver concern than 2,000 US troops dying during a very serious war–that is the analogy that you fail to understand. So please stop making up stories about Democrats spending out of control when Congress didn’t even have discretion over that deficit, nor was it imprudent to throw a lifeline to people when the bottom fell out of the economy. You totally make up stuff and destroy your credibility. More importantly, you miss an opportunity to learn what the heck really happened. If you do this willfully, to preserve an ideology, then you are borderline crazy. people have to learn to live in reality, afterall.
Hobbs, I spoke no half-truths. Everything I wrote is true. And your ad-hominem attack on me doesn’t change the veracity of what I am saying at all. If you want to debate or rebut the substance of my argument, then feel free. Otherwise, understand that if you just want to name call and nothing else, then I will assume that you have nothing and have lost the argument. I am guessing you are not a third-grader, so expecting rational arguments from you is not asking too much.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:52amGive me five minutes with him on my radio show and little Tony will cry like the little baby that he is.
Report Post »abc
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 4:28pmGive me 5 minutes on your radio show, and you’ll be crying for a week.
Report Post »I_can't_believe_this_stuff
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:49amIt’s understandable that weenie, knatler, and wasserwoman (?) were elected to office by people who apparently passed-away or have a mental deficiency. I guess you can say they are appropriately represented. Can you guess which one of these three served their country in the military? Answer: none. Which of these ever three risked their lives, liberty, or property for their fellow citizens? Answer: none. Which of these three feeds at every government trough? Answer: … you know what I’m saying. Thankfully there are only a few of these morons in our country.
Report Post »Have-Gun-Will-Travel
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:49amAfter all the guys name is Weiner what do you want out of him
Report Post »commonsenseguy
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:46amhe is like the little dog in the street that barks at every one passing bye,and will run at you with the bigger dogs,but when you try to kick at them to defend your self, he is the first to run home and bark from behind the fence.what a wussy!!!!!!! he is just mad because he is stupid compared to bachmann and kelly. what a titty baby who acts like a 2 year old,oyeah, 2 years don’t act like that . i bet when the set was over, he went home and sucked is thumb!!!!!!!
Report Post »Helldogger
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:44am“It‘s Bush’s fault It‘s Bush’s fault” Blau Blau Blau. I‘ll tel what’s Bush’s fault. He was a “weener” & let these mongrel walk all over him in the name of the republican party & the conservative movement & now our good conservatives have to take the heat he started.
Report Post »NO RINOs!!!! Iswear before God, if the republican party nominates a f*%#@XXcking RINO, I will not only vote for the liberal democRAT, I’ll work on their campaign.
jagr1850
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:43amthe weiner can’t hold a real job so he ran for elected jobs….what a friggin loser…HE IS AN ELECTED WEINER ..i would not pay him minimum wage to wash my car……he does not belong in congress
Report Post »the point
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:43am“They” walk among us. And some of “them” are running this country….or trying to.
Report Post »The Gooch
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:41amWas there ever a more appropriate surname for a human being? Sometimes ya just gotta acknowledge that there is a higher power and that higher power has a sense of humor. It’s like Andy Dick, ‘cuz if you know who Andy Dick is and you know how he behaves, he’s a big, well, ya know…..
Report Post »I saw video over the weekend of Weiner nutting out on the floor. We are rid of Grayson, so I suppose there was a vacuum to be filled. This guy roles his eyes more than my 13 year old stepdaugher. She’s cute. Weiner’s pathetic. Fiery? How about histrionic.
mcFirst
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:40amthe biggest bill ever was created by Weiner’s admin. Where is the spending fairy that makes congress stop spending.
Report Post »BeckIsNuts
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:35amWeiner’s rjust playing his role in the Dem party. Politics is like professional wrestling: keep the fans/voters riled up. That‘s Weiner’s gimmick. He’s good at it.
Report Post »a_lady_patriot
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:33amWeiner is just like those little dogs that yap aand yap – says nothing but won’t shut up. I am pulling for the tea party people to stand strong and tall and show the sleeping Americans just what a farce the progressives and their policies are.
Report Post »jacquecustard
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:32amThe guy is unstable !
Report Post »freedomwatcher
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:31amWeiner will always be a weiner just like a frog will always be a frog. It’s not his fault.
Report Post »You want to know whose fault it is?…. the idiots that voted him into office. Same goes for Barney Frank and Henry Reid.
kryptonite
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:31amNow I know why Weiner married a Muslim woman. I bet he verbally abuses her on a daily basis.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 9:48amjust being married to him would be abusive – worse then water boarding
Report Post »kenr1963
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:28amPardon me while I puke!!!
Report Post »BONETRAUMA
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:26amWeiner……how does one get a name like that?
Report Post »komponist-ZAH
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 10:23amBy being from Wien (Vienna).
Report Post »diogenese
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:26amWeiner is a weener.
Report Post »Reagan/DeMint.deciple
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 10:54amC//////////3 <<<<< an Anthony Weiner , made by Wasserman co. …… :~)
Report Post »untameable-kate
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 11:32amMy son and I were making fun of him just last night.
Report Post »JohnHenry
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:24amJKN,
Report Post »That’s an major insult to Barney Fife ….. By comparison to “tony hotdog” Barney Fife was a mental giant .
goatkid
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 2:07pmExactly right. Barney was a just silly, this guy is nothing but an A** Hole
Report Post »Reagan/DeMint.deciple
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 2:41pm@KRYPTONTE.. Yeah, You’re exactly right, I guess i didn’t put two and two together… It’s WAS when Glenn joined the FOX team, i just didn’t see it..
Report Post »Yeah, Now he jumps on Glenn’s coat tails with the “Bold & Freash” tour.. Thanks for shedding a new light .. Cheers .
Oil_Robb
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:24amWhen will Coservatives learn?…..you dont need to go on thier media outlets to get the message of Basic Coservative values out. When Orielly goes on the VIEW or Palin goes on Ophra nothing good ever comes from it…..FOX NEWS kisked A$$ in all the media ratings …..so I say again why let them ambush you?
Report Post »Reagan/DeMint.deciple
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 11:02amHate to break it to you ROBB but, O‘reilly isn’t a conservative… He straddles both sides of the fence only since Obama took office.. I quit watching him after I saw him gloat about being invited to and going to the whitehouse “Christmas party” and there were many other instances that led up to my decision… Course, everyone has their own opinion and I didn’t mean to intrude on yours.. Cheers….
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 1:21pm@Reagan/Demint
Report Post »I‘ve been watching O’Reilly since he started working at Fox. The man lost his soul a long time ago. When Glenn became successful, O’Reilly tried to squash him, then to control him, but failed miserably, so wiley O’Reilley decided to “befriend” Glenn. O’Reilly only looks out for himself.
grandmaof5
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:23amFL got rid of Grayson but they weren’t smart enought to vote out the other most embarassing attraction in the state, Wasserman-Shultz. Weiner is nothing but a loud mouth who yaps to hear himself and apparently thinks he is very clever. Hate to break it to him but he is just a rude, crude and socially unacceptable dolt. He did not rub off on Wasserman-Shultz, she is just as rude as he is. Hopefully south FL will wake up by the next election.
Report Post »IntheKnowOG
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:43amNot bloody likely. That’s Manhattan south. It’s a district made for liberals by liberals. Mose’s own ghetto mixed with the self hating jews who fear them so much, they vote for an appeaser to keep them placated.
Report Post »abc
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 11:36amThe substance of Weiner’s comments were true. Either rebut his assertions or be quiet. Name calling is not productive–on television or on this blog.
Report Post »libsrillogical
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 1:33pmHey ABC – YOU be quiet! You can’t rebut eye-roles and mockery from Weiner, nor his illogical, liberal lies. All one can do is mock his Soros-soaked mind – the same one that you have…
Report Post »darlenekay
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:20amDoes any one take Weiner seriously? He’s a joke. He hasn‘t seen a spending or stimulus bill he hasn’t voted for. His party has had 2-4 years to bring down spending, to cut taxes, etc., and they did NOTHING but add to the deficit. As for jobs, please someone provide a list of the millions of PERMANENT FULL TIME jobs this administration has created!
Report Post »Oil_Robb
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:27amThe God-less party of secularism like Muslims have dont have a problem with SPEWING lies.
How can Obama say hes a Christian and support Abortion?…….Its because hes not a Christian
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:43amHere here, Christians can’t support abortion or gay rights, if they do, they are no better than the muslims and using religion for personal power grab.
Report Post »Rickfromillinois
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 10:06amThe only jobs that the government creates are government jobs.
Report Post »Mermaz
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:18amBravo to Mike Kelly for reminding the nation the difference between himself and Weiner.
Report Post »TrueGrit
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 10:05amLaugh all you want folks.
This moron is going places and is on the MOST FAVORED Demo.
list in Washington.
He’s being pushed by Schumer and Bloomberg.
And the Democrats in NY loves this idiot.
AND HAS A GREAT PR firm…CONTORVERSY MAKES GREAT PRESS!!!!!
Just as scary as Barney being loved in Ma.
Wolverine
Report Post »So
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 11:12amBravo to Kelly is right.
Weiner and his sidekick are rude, pompous air bags. I can’t stand to look at him or hear him speak.
He’s just a version of Rahm Emanuel. Weiner would be a suited for a stand up routine. He’s an animated clown.
What mouth pieces for the left.
Report Post »abc
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 11:35amThere is no difference between Kelly and Weiner now. They are both congressmen, not businessmen. The role of government is not profit maximization, so the responsibilities of Kelly are now the same as Weiner. Also, I have always worked in the private sector but I agree with Weiner, not Kelly. You cannot get by in Washington on rhetoric. You will need to cut spending AND raise taxes to solve the budget crisis and the sooner Kelly and others end their denial, the better we all will be. As a private sector guy, I can tell you that the numbers do not lie. But those (like Kelly) that choose to ignore them will do great damage to the US.
Report Post »blacksmith
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 1:57pmthe only problem I have with Kelly is the problem I have with all politicians. At the end of the segment he laughed and shook hands with the people that had just derided and bad mouthed him. This is not a game and these people are not the other team. This is a question of the loss of liberty and the destruction of the Constitution. I would not shake hands with the devil. The idea of civility towards these bastards must come to a halt. No more cocktail parties or power lunches with these people. Roll up your sleeves, get to work and leave these progressive bastards standing on the sidelines with thier thumbs in thier asses!
Report Post »JKN
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:17amAnthony Weiner reminds me of Barney Fife…
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 9:08am@JKN
“Anthony Weiner reminds me of Barney Fife…”
Little Weiner is a nasty fellow, hey?
Report Post »exdem
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 9:12amPlease don’t insult Barney!
Report Post »Cemoto78
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 9:15amWhy do you hate Barney Fife so much? What is Anthony Wieners middle name, Feces?
Report Post »shorthanded12
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 9:37amLOL @ Deputy Fife and Wiener…dont laugh to much Mr Andy has been bought on board to sell that damn Obamacare, The town of Mayberry better wake up or People Like Weiner will sell them a bill of goods that dont amount to nothing short of toilet paper. Ooops I forgot they Already have $13 trillion debt.
Report Post »starman70
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 10:00amHis name says it all, WEINER!
Report Post »Reagan/DeMint.deciple
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 2:34pm@ABC. I have a true fix for your annoyance … MoveOn.org…
Report Post »Bigbird1960
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 4:48pmBarney Fife had a heart of gold. This vampire is monkey feces. Stop insulting Don Knotts character.
Report Post »oldguy49
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:16ami work for a living and i dont have a collage degree…………….but this guy is a butt head
GeauxAlready
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:24amI just wonder how much time Winnie spent shoved in a locker while in High School?
Report Post »IntheKnowOG
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:32amI work for a living and have 2 college degrees. That guy is an IDIOT and a ********. I see he uses the same logic as a 12 year old. MOM: Honey, your father lost his job, so, we are going to have to cancel the cable, your XBOX live subscription and shut off your cell phone. SON: But, we already have them mom. Why don’t we just not eat as much, and take less showers……
Report Post »Tal-El
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:47amI also work for a living and have four college degrees, including a PhD: he is is fact a butt head.
Report Post »bry
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:56amI am so sad to live in the state that elects this man. He is an absolute liar. When asked a question, he ignores it and answers a question made up in his own head. He talks loud and fast, confuses the issue and has the nerve to bame everyone but himself.
Report Post »I tried to help vote these people out, No luck and no help from th NY state republican committee. I can at least be happy to calll Rep. King my congressman.
seeker9
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:57amNo campaign rhetoric from these two Dems. Nope. Bush’s fault, millionaires and billionaires only,… HA!
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:58amI was so proud of Michelle. She aint no hothouse Lilly!
Report Post »For too long, conservatives have been “Mr. nice guys”, and not interrupted or filibustered. Those are the ways of the Left.
Time for assertiveness! Way to go, Michelle!
DeMint/Bachman 2012
Young Entrepreneur
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 8:59amWait for it.. wait for it… BUSH!
Report Post »Independent Tess
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 9:30amWeiner is such a weiner. And he’s getting worse as time goes by. I would be so embarrassed if he represented me!
Report Post »338lapua
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 9:35amAnthony BWAHHHHHAAAAhahahahahahahahahahaha Weiner opened his mouth. Don’t need a laugh track for that one!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH Debbie Doublename is pretty much the same, BWAHHHHHAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA
Report Post »Those lefty’s they make me laugh.
KEA
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 9:38amIm convinced that a major portion or our problems are from those with college educations. I work for a living, support my family, stay out of debt and even have some college but the more I see out there the more I realize Im glad my child did not go to college and learn ANYTHING from these ********.
He is doing just fine and raising a family and one day its the working class folks that will again, save this country.
Report Post »Cobra Blue
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 9:41amWeiner is just an angry liberal progressive man that was picked on as a child. All mouth and no A** to back it up. He paid for it in school I’m sure.
Report Post »mtnclimberjim
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 9:45amDo you need anymore proof that the libs suffer from a mental disorder? This will not end well. There will be violence of the likes we have never seen in our lifetime. But then again this is just history repeating itself. Wait for the “crises” that barry will use to shut down the elections. Their insanity will not let them give up power through the vote, they will go so violent. Get ready. In a morbid way it’s almost fun to watch.
Report Post »Dustyluv
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 9:52amComparing Weiner to a ******** insults buttheads everywhere…
Report Post »snowleopard3200 {cat folk art}
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 10:18amI see with Weiner that he is amply qualified to be the next Vice President; in other words, clueless, reckless, and totally out of touch with reality and living somewhere down the rabbit hole with the mad hatter and the rest of that bunch.
Report Post »Reagan/DeMint.deciple
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 10:50amDid ya notice, that the two dems on the panel act like little infants and the two repubs act like adults ? It ought to be fun in the 112 congress trying to deal with all those damn babies.. wahh wwaahh !! I want my milk and I you to pay for it…. You know , the funniest thing said on this panel was when douche bag shultz said that 26 year old children can stay on their parents health ins. 26 ? 26 ???? that’s a child ? Something wrong with the liberal mind if they think that at 26 your still a child..
Report Post »bsone
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 10:53amThe Bitch and the Whiner. No wonder we’re in so much trouble. They can’t see beyond their own egos.
Report Post »Fight on Bachmann and Kelly.
Dandylyon
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 11:07amAt-a-boy Weiner,show us all the epitome of the Democratic party and what it has come to with spokes person’s like yourself.Only someone like you (and others) in the progressive movement can really show the country what the Democratic party has become.
Keep talking SLICK!
Report Post »abc
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 11:16amIt is very annoying that this blog never addresses the SUBSTANCE of these debates, but just the style–invariably focusing only the lack of decorum shown by the left, but never the equally rude right wing pundit or politician. Typical propaganda, but worth pointing out.
The substance of Weiner’s comment, however, is not in dispute. Our creditors do not care whether we do not pay them back because spending was too high or tax receipts were too low. A default will occur in either case. What this means is that when Michelle Bachmann says that spending hikes must be paid for but tax cuts need not be, she is living in a fantasy world in which our creditors will somehow forgive one type of default but not another. This is truly a land of fairies and gumdrop trees. So Weiner’s observation, while a little colorful (and a bit harsh if you like Bachmann) is nonetheless TRUE…
CultureWarriors
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 11:50amIf you look in the dictionary under punk, you’ll see a picture of A. “little” Weiner. What an appropriate name.
Report Post »Marcobob69
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 12:31pmAnthony Weiner PLAYS with his Weiner! I thought Face The Nation was cancelled back in the 90′s! Do they still have that fossil Bob Scheffer still on there? Sickening person that Weiner, he’s a little lower than whale excrement in the bottom of the ocean. Anyone got a muzzle???
Report Post »seeker9
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 12:49pmABC
Report Post »It is not a static world we live in. The consequences of raising taxes is the government usually expands government which has to be supported by the taxpayer (the government does not create wealth but consumes it). Taxes left in the private sector (at least some of it) can be used to create wealth, jobs, etc.
Polwatcher
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 1:58pmWe are who we think we are. Anthony Weiner is who he thinks he is and he is a little Pr—.
Report Post »HillBillySam1
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 2:17pmAh, the spirit of Alan Grayson lives on in the hallowed halls of Congress…..kinda brings a tear to the eye, doesn’t it???
Report Post »jrcess
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 2:51pmIt does not take much intelect to know this guy is a butt head.
Report Post »IntheKnowOG
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 5:16pm@abc
So you would support a flat tax?
Report Post »seeker9
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 5:52pmABC, tell Art that after approx 10 years of stable tax rates, we would be at the top of the curve. I am surprised he stumbled on that one.
Report Post »You do not have a PhD? You can still get one. Try Occidental. Dr. C Heldman has some interesting ideas. Free college, pay checks for all citizens, print money and do not be concerned with the deficit. Our foreign creditors are jumping with joy. Ha.
The rich folks you mention trade capital assets. Capital gains rates were reduced in order to encourage investment and capital formation. If their secretaries invest, and have gains, they too are taxed at 15% rate on that portion.
COFemale
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 6:03pmI am unemployed and have a Master’s and he is still a ********.
Apparently, this man’s mother did not teach him manners or tact. This is what happens to children of parents who don’t give a rats putootie about their children, leave them to fend for themselves or with the nanny.
This man might just be more arrogant than Obama.
Report Post »chazman
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 7:19pmYa know, there are some people that deserve to have REALLY bad things happen to them. Things that take care of their problems forever… Weiner’s got problems …
Report Post »POINMO
Posted on January 3, 2011 at 9:02pmNot Just a butt head,someone needs to reach down his throat grab his butt hole & turn him inside out
Report Post »click4cheapandeasyweb
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 12:53amThe best line in this piece… “Anthony Weiner pulled an Anthony Weiner.”
I love it!
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 2:19amif this guy wasn’t one of our politicians…he’d be great for SNL…how can you respect someone like this…he acts like he’s 4..
Report Post »quiet little lamb
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 5:04amWas his dad the nerd from all the 80′s movies? he reminds me of the REALLLLLLLY nerdy guy that matthew broderick goes to visit at the beginiing of War Games
Report Post »Monsta777
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 8:09amI don‘t know how many times this Weiner punk’s run-on mouth got him shoved in a locker during high school but I have the sudden and overwhelming urge to shove him in again now!
Who is electing these losers? There’s the problem for ya. Let’s defund them all.
Someone tell The Weiner that it’s the rich that provide jobs, provide business, provide revenue…….why do we want to punish them for excelling?
Report Post »paulsfam4
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 8:50amAnthony Weiner resembles the body part
Report Post »abc
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 8:59amInTheKnow, your question about a flat tax is a non-sequitur, but I’ll answer it anyway. I am against the flat tax, as are most Americans, who favor a progressive tax structure. The reason for this is two-fold: 1) the marginal utility of each incremental goes down, so it is easier to part with, and 2) the move toward a more regressive tax structure since Reagan needs to be reversed to make up for the injustice of the last 20 years.
Seeker, I prefer to get my higher degrees at Ivy League schools. To imply that all higher education is on the level of one dimwit professor is beyond stupid. Thanks for playing, but you’ll have to try that illogical stuff somewhere else. Also, fixed capital formation in this country has grown at a lower pace since capital gains taxes were lowered, while the income gap was widened. Now, either the people you say who passed the lower rates are asleep or they had other reasons for doing what they did. I think it’s the latter reason. And equity in rates does matter. Especially when the secretaries you mention can barely pay the rent, much less funnel their wealth into stocks at the same rate as their hedge fund managing bosses. Get real. Think for yourself. Stop believing the propaganda when the facts point in a totally different direction.
Report Post »seeker9
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 9:42amABC, that dimwit professor claims to have input to the White House.
Report Post »You lost me with the fixed capital stuff. Current rates have been in effect for about 10 years.
I have better things to do than research what other people make, but my bet would be that hedge fund secretaries make quite a comfortable living. Point is that most any one can participate in the capital markets and hence, are elligible for cap gains tax rates.
The income gap is due largely due to unemployment rate. Capital formation has undoubtedly increased over the last few months, but was obliterated at the beginning of the financial crisis.
neversaynever
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 12:05pm@ABC… You mentioned the economy during the Clinton administration as being better than both Regan and Bush, and your reasoning seems to be behind the higher tax rates under Clinton. This is a valid point, however Clinton was President during the “.com” boom and therefore reaped heavily as the bubble grew bigger and bigger. To compare the economic status we are in now to that of the Clinton administration is laughable. I don’t believe that if Clinton had been under similar economic circumstances he would have raised taxes (we are/were in a recession), but maybe I am giving Clinton too much credit. My feeling is we dont need to raise taxes, instead we need to cut spending across the board and make it a goal to eliminate wasteful spending wherever it exists. That includes, but is not limited to, the Pentagon and Army spending, social security and medicare, welfare, and others. After having eliminated the waste and overspending, we can then have a more concrete number to reach and we can figure out at that point whether raising taxes is necessary. Until that point however, I will continue to believe we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem.
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 1:37pmWhen I see this man all I can think about is what a weenie he is. He shouts everyone down thinking he is controlling the subject, but all I see is a insecure weenie, mean spirited and hateful. All the things I reject in his type. Lord knows what woman would marry this type person unless she likes to be controlled. Wake up sisters, we control the men, but gently.
Report Post »SOFLARIDER
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 2:04pmYou have to admit that Weiner’s come a long way since he was in those Revenge of the Nerds movies.
Report Post »drbage
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 2:09pmThe Progs needed to have someone to replace Grayson and it seems that Whiney Weiner has willingly taken over that mantle and I guess Washerwoman Shill is the lady-in-waiting.
Report Post »avenger
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 3:13pmI guess mom missed sex ed and the part about abortion….
Report Post »PT69
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 3:52pmI do have a degree and he is still a ********. He should be shoved in a locker again.
Report Post »SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 4:12pmweiner, weiner, weiner. how it feel to be a weiner? If he wasn’t in congress, michelle wouldn’t even give this big nose loser the time of day. Weiner, you are a failure. own it, work it, work your weiner. your filled with the same waste ingredients as a real weiner.
Report Post »SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 4:15pmhey debbie wasser..whatever. nice frickin gheri curl. need some activator for that mop of yours? look in the mirror before you go on tv. sometimes I wish I didn’t have hdtv. Hope they had napkins handy for what looks to be a bigger oil spill than BP.
Report Post »neversaynever
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 4:30pm@Blacksmith…I disagree that they should not shake hands. You can have an ardent disagreement with someone and still show respect. Did Weiner show respect? No, but that doesnt mean we should stoop to his level. People can disagree with you and still want whats best for this country (and in their mind they believe what they are doing is right just as much as you do).
Report Post »We don’t need to see fights in congress and the senate as we see in some asian countries. We need to have a civil discourse, and if they stoop to a low level you can end the arguement, because that means you have won. I dont hate Weiner, I dont know him. What I do know about him are his beliefs, and I completly and utterly disagree with his beliefs. Other than that he may be a good father/brother/son whatever and ultimately a good man beside his beliefs. Our arguments are superior so we will win without resorting to the childish behavior Weiner exhibits in seemingly every interview.
SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 4:36pmPrefer to get your education at Ivy league schools. great. Now you have just as much credibility as the current admin. No further response is required.
Report Post »tower7femacamp
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 6:00pmHIS name is Wiener what else can I say, folks you can’t make this up.
Report Post »barbaraw62
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 6:32pmABC……..HAHAHAHAHAHA …. YOU met with Laffer……that’s a big laugh. I have a friend who knows Laffer….and believe me he wouldn’t get caught not answering a question from little ole you…LOL
Report Post »Curator_JDR
Posted on January 4, 2011 at 7:44pmI can’t stand the sight of this guy. Tony the Weiner appears in this hilarious animated short feature about the insanity of the Progressives with Nancy Poles-I-dont-see as the villain. This “Not So Grimm Fairy Tale” is the first film to adapt Avatar for comedy.An instant classic. http://www.marcrubin.com/hairmerica.ivnu
Report Post »