Environment

‘Any Other Multi-Billion Dollar Industry Would Be Treated Cynically By Reporters’: Canadian Pundit Ezra Levant Rips Global Warming Lobby

Remember when global warming was a gigantic, apocalyptic danger that was going to destroy the world and that no true scientist would deny was such a thing?

We don’t either. Indeed, after two successive scandals, more financial conflicts of interest than can be properly counted, and “An Inconvenient Truth” being ruled inaccurate by a UK Court, it’s starting to become a mystery how this doomsday cult-style prophecy attracted the kind of credibility it did.

But unfortunately, not everyone appears to have caught on that it’s old news. To that end, Canada apparently is still being besieged by the global warming lobby, especially in the media. Which makes this epic rant from Canadian conservative pundit Ezra Levant all the more satisfying to hear:

Highlights from the lengthy deconstruction follow, courtesy of Fox Nation:

Most journalists who are most normally the most skeptical people in the room turn into obedient stenographers when faced with global warming salesmen. Any other multi-billion dollar industry would be treated cynically by reporters, not so the Global Warming industry or its high living jet setting tycoons. Journalists become fanboys! Yeah, no thanks. I’m not that obedient. Political correctness accounts for some of this, I mean it’s still fashionable in elite circles to follow the global warming fad and journalism professors are usually left wing.[...]

But I think the largest factor is the simplest! Follow the money. There are billions of dollars spent each year on global warming, not on fixing the so-called problem. But rather funding the political, diplomatic and journalistic class that keeps this so called crisis bubbling and keeps beating the drum for big government solutions. And if you‘re a professor try getting a research grant if you’re a global warming skeptic. You can’t! Universities have been bought too!
But here’s the good news. Normal people are not buying it. A new survey by Atticus research shows when Canadians are asked to rank their environmental concerns, global warming comes in dead last, out of 7 choices. People are sick of the propaganda, sick of being told what to think and sick of being told that we are in a perpetual crisis and I think people are sick of high energy prices, high gas prices for your car, high power prices at home. And we’re sick of the hypocrisy of David Suzuki with his 3 homes lecturing the rest of us to cut back.

Well, count me with the skeptics on the inside. There is no ideology or religion that should be above criticism or debate including global warming. Look I don’t care what Ed Stelmach says. The debate is not over.

No, no it isn’t. And the global warming crowd should be thankful for that, because right now, the debate is not going their way.

Comments (83)

  • SHOWMESTATEGUY
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:34pm

    Every few years the dem libs come up with a new crisis. It was aids for awhile, I believe the reports on ABC, NBC,CBS and CNN said something like 1 in 10 Americans had already been infected and the world was going to end if our government didn’t spent billions of dollars to find a cure. Let me say this, aids is bad, really bad for the people who contract it. Being a drug addict is bad for those who choose to follow that road. The point is those people chose that road.

    The one in ten number was made up to instill fear in the general population. The dem lib’s had to protect the media, which was majority ****. The dem lib’s and the dem lib supported media knew what caused this disease but they had to try to make it an (everybody) disease in order to get the government to spend the enormous amout of money needed to find a cure.

    If the amount of money spent on aids had been spend on cancer research we probably would have found a cure for most forms of that disease by now. But when the dem libs see their **** friends in the media dying from a self inflicted disease it was far easier for them to make up stories so the general population feels threatened by the subject.

    Aids, global warming, nuclear winter all hyped for a dem lib gain.

    Report Post »  
    • drphil69
      Posted on May 25, 2012 at 12:55pm

      Well the farse that got DDT banned, and the EPA started, has literally caused millions of deaths – real human deaths, and it was all BS. So the environmentalist wackos are literally responsible for millions of deaths and the MSM treat them like gods, and anyone that would contradict their ‘findings’… well you know the rest.

      And this doesn’t count all the deaths from left wing dictators committing genocide – Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Castro and yes, Hitler (NAZI = national socialist party). I guess Obama will be added to that list -surely he cannot allow us ‘evil’ conservatives to live!

      Report Post »  
  • Southern Rebel
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:33pm

    Ezra is a good man! He’s one of the clearest voices of reason up in Canada. Not too shabby eh? :)

    Report Post » Southern Rebel  
    • WhimsyB
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 9:14pm

      He is my fave!! He has his own show at Sunnewsnetwork.ca, called The Source. More of his enlightenment can also be found at ezralevant.com…

      Report Post »  
    • VinnieSquawker
      Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:58am

      Don’t forget Mark Steyn, though he is now in NH. A couple of good Canucks.

      Report Post » VinnieSquawker  
  • woodcellar
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:25pm

    CO2 is plant food more CO2 more food for people. Research in the “60” showed that yields of crops close to busy roads was higher because of evil car exaust. 50years they are still feed us Bull puckies.

    Report Post »  
    • mtcountrygrl
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 9:25pm

      Remember acid rain? How about in the 70′s it was CO2 was causing the next ice age? The hole in the ozone? Killer bees? Aids? The overpopulation problem? Have these people ever been right?

      Report Post »  
    • Jaycen
      Posted on May 25, 2012 at 1:11am

      Killer bees were supposed to be in Canada by now, migrating at ridiculous rates farther and farther north.

      Bow to your new bee masters, and their breathless entourage of journalist sycophants.

      Report Post » Jaycen  
    • Bikkiboo
      Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:56pm

      If CO2 is really the problem, and trees DO absorb CO2, wouldn’t it just make more sense to plant more trees? Let the do-gooders try to rebuild the ancient rainforest in Africa. It would keep them busy, it would make work for the natives, and it would solve – GASP – Global Warming, but then, what would they do for a crisis?

      Report Post » Bikkiboo  
  • kenboo1
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:03pm

    Sweet…. ay???

    Report Post »  
    • TurboCat
      Posted on May 25, 2012 at 3:40am

      Aside from making money by duping people and also controlling people, one of the goals was more evil than those; I think they would use it for population control.

      Report Post »  
    • Rijjka
      Posted on May 25, 2012 at 4:36pm

      It‘s spelled ’Eh?’

      But yeah, it is pretty sweet. Ezra is one of my favorite commentators up north here. Hes got one book, called ethical oil, which is basicly him taking enviromentalists grievances agains the oil sands and North american oil and destroying them one by one.

      So yeah, pretty sweet eh?

      Report Post »  
  • progressiveslayer
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:01pm

    I like hockey but this theory is debunked.http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/9292009-confirmed—global-warming-hockey-stick-is-a-fraud/blog-180309/

    Report Post » progressiveslayer  
  • progressiveslayer
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:55pm

    http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=9687&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ClimaterealistsNewsBlog+%28ClimateRealists+News+Blog%29

    Report Post » progressiveslayer  
  • progressiveslayer
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:53pm

    Here’s some interesting reading.http://sppiblog.org/news/environmental-groups-collecting-millions-from-federal-agencies-they-sue-studies-show

    Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • MCDAVE
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:29pm

      Obama’s spreading the wealth….our wealth and buying more votes, while destroying our country..its a win win for the communist POS

      Report Post »  
    • MCDAVE
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:31pm

      Since the liberals seldom give to their causes…they steal it from the taxpayers

      Report Post »  
  • Daveed
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:46pm

    Yeah! Mr. Canadian! You go boy! Viva La Canada! Come visit is the USA, We love you!

    Report Post »  
    • lukerw
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:59pm

      BS smells like BS in any Country! Bravo!

      Report Post » lukerw  
  • thibx
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:37pm

    strong started the bull. bill clinton told gore i know how you could make a lot of money if you run with it. that was the beginning of the big lie. china is the only one with a brain they don’t buy the crap. they make money from it.

    Report Post »  
  • progressiveslayer
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:35pm

    A site for rational people http://ilovecarbondioxide.com/. Warmists do not enter site, too much logic and reasoning will explode your high powered brains,on second though,knock yourself out.

    Report Post » progressiveslayer  
  • progressiveslayer
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:17pm

    A class action suit should be brought against Al Gore for perpetrating the fraud of man made global warming,sue him for trillions and put him out of business.The hubris of man to think he can do anything to alter the climate,it‘s preposterous on it’s face and thousands of climatologists agree,man made global warming is a hoax.

    Report Post » progressiveslayer  
  • nobull14
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:12pm

    Global warming is a progressive pile of crap !!!! . Its just another way to control you and your actions.I remember back in the late 1998 the two researchers that were trying to caught a cow fart in a mason jar ?. I thought it was stupid then and now . There is nothing that can be done that would change anything for centuries , mother nature takes care of the planet it self .

    Report Post »  
  • Sue Dohnim
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:07pm

    I have digging into this stuff for a while… The frontman for this entire AGW scam was “socialist” Maurice Strong who worked within the UN “Global Governance” scheme. His goal was to create layers and layers of bureaucracy until a supranational government was established. Of course, he would be filthy rich as he works closely to direct the massive bureaucracy toward his personal financial interests. Carbon trading schemes.

    But,, here is the fascinating part, his cousin was an American Marxist who went to visit Stalin and later moved to china and was close to Mao, in fact she “Anna Strong” is buried near to Mao in China. Further, Maurice Strong now lives in China and works as a consultant for the chinese government. He is also closely aligned with Gorbachev. So, he is paid to push carbon controls, which are really an attack on the Wests economic growth , thereby subverting the West form within using its own resources while aiding and abetting the Global Socialist/Marxist elites.

    Science and the West has been subverted by its enemy and nobody realizes it. The real war is from within.

    Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
    • wvernon1981
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:17pm

      Which is why the Chinese are implementing their own limits on CO2 emissions?

      Report Post »  
    • Sue Dohnim
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 9:41pm

      China was exempted from Kyoto, Maurice Strongs project

      Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
  • progressiveslayer
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:02pm

    The Marxist regime currently in power for another eight months has ordered the EPA to classify co2 as a pollutant,the minor detail that co2 is essential for life on earth is to be ignored.The agenda of the lunatics that believe the myth of man made global warming must be pursued at all costs and when it bankrupts America it’s a plus for the globalists that want our standard of living reduced to that of a third world country.Thank you Mr.Levant and continue the fight against these enemies of humanity.

    Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • wvernon1981
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:13pm

      I don’t think you realize that physics dictates that CO2 is a greenhouse gas by its very physical properties.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_effect

      Report Post »  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:19pm

      I don’t think you understand that co2 is essential for life on this planet and man can do nothing to affect the climate.

      Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • Rollo2
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:38pm

      A post in Wikipedia is not “science”.

      Report Post »  
    • wvernon1981
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:26pm

      It’s a good starting point. Do you have a contention with the content of the article or are you using “wikipedia” as an excuse to avoid the science?

      Report Post »  
    • Sue Dohnim
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 10:51pm

      @WVERN!1981

      Your inference that Co2 is a GHG and therefore increasing it causes GW is a fundamental flaw in logic, it actually exposes the entire flaw in the AGW theory.

      In glass jar experiments Co2 traps heat and a value can be measured.

      In the real world there is no glass jar, it turns out that heat escapes into space at a greater rate than first thought, the Oceans are not trapping heat, the temps are stable, the cloud feedbacks are not as they were modelled. In other words, the application of results from a lab experiment can’t be extrapolated to an extremely complex thing like the real world and climate. It is far too complex to isolate a single variable and claim it is the cause. Even the UNs political IPCC admits that they do not look at anything other than manmade influences, their agenda by definition is not scientific but rather political.

      Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
  • Rayblue
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 6:59pm

    There will always be some crisis to distract from the everyday living we could enjoy. The doom scenario was only in different forms from as far back as I can remember. The end of the world from religious cults. The Bomb. Population explosion. Plague. Famine. Oceans overflowing. Oceans receding. Comets. Outer space contact. WAR. Always something to interupt what life we would make for ourselves in a world that will withstand us. An earth that will endure without yielding. An earth that will abide us and our children. And our childrens children for the duration.

    Report Post » Rayblue  
    • Rollo2
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:40pm

      Well said, Ray.

      Report Post »  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:20pm

      Federal Reserve System + Politicians + Tell-A-Vision = Assembly Line Crises.

      It is called the Hegelian Dialectic Show.

      · Global pandemic – Level 6
      · Mortgage/housing crisis
      · Banking/lending crisis
      · Automobile industry crisis
      · Insurance industry crisis
      · Healthcare crisis
      · Southwestern border crisis
      · Black market drug crisis
      · National education crisis
      · Nature/global warming crisis
      · Jobs/unemployment crisis
      · On-going weather and forest fire crises
      · Extreme and unread congressional legislation crisis due to on-going crises

      http://www.rense.com/general86/nomis.htm

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • MCDAVE
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:35pm

      @Problemsolver….you got that right

      Report Post »  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 11:00pm

      @McDave

      You know it, brother :)

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
  • moussiagilda
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 6:49pm

    Doomsday! To hell with doomsday. There is no doom. Except for Romney. Pelosi eyes.

    Report Post »  
  • The Gooch
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 6:49pm

    It is no secret this doom and gloom religion was and still is seen as a coercive tool to impose some seriously draconian progressive wet dreams upon humanity in general. Some followers of the church of Gais are so sick with this zealotry that they call for concentration camps and purges. Like it or not, eco-goons, some of your tribe have embraced this dark faith as an excuse to abolish private property rights and, if ‘necessary’, cull the herd based on the words of the movement’s prophets. Not ALL climate change proponents are misanthropes, but those who see no answer other than dictatorial ‘fixes’ are very vocal, very clear on what they want to see done to the human species and not the least bit tolerant or even willing to consider some of the “science” behind their sacred cow is quite tainted with ideology and (SURPRISE!!!) greed.
    Oh, and I guarantee you the proponents who respond to this article will have one haunting refrain: You‘re stupid and don’t matter. Wow. Heady.

    Report Post »  
  • moussiagilda
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 6:48pm

    The weather is whatever God wants it to be. That’s it.

    Okay, to sound stupid, it also tends to be what I want it to be. My constant prayer is “Thy will and mine be done.” Make that your prayer too.

    Report Post »  
  • Ben__Franklin
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 6:33pm

    Al Gore spewed more green house gases into the air with his private jet last week than my entire family did with their automobiles in the last decade. Al Gore’s mansions use more fossil fuel burning electricity in one week than my entire family uses in a decade. Al Gore is a Liberal Progressive Billionaire due to Global Cooling, errrr Global Warming….. errrr Climate Change. Al Gore is your typical Limousine Liberal Progressive Hypocrite. Two other things are for sure with Al, 1> He is not paying his fair share and 2> He definitely is not sharing the wealth.

    Report Post »  
    • wvernon1981
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 6:50pm

      Who cares what Al Gore says about the climate? 97 percent of published climatologists accept anthropogenic causes of climate change to be the best explanation we have right now.

      Report Post »  
    • Sue Dohnim
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:22pm

      @WVERNON1981

      Not true,

      The funding is virtually all on the pro AGW side
      The peer review process is corrupted, non AGW papers or scientists are blackballed.
      The IPCC completely completely ignores natural factors. It was set up yo prove AGW, this was politics, not science.

      Climate science is like astrology, it is isn’t real science, It is political.

      But most importantly, the science is built on the work and premise from about 6 core Marxist Climate scientist and the climate modelling has completely failed.

      The entire field has been built on a false premise. The data and correlative theories have completely been debunked.

      There is no scientific backing for AGW. There are hypothetical theories, but that is it.

      Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
    • alinmatt
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:31pm

      @vernon
      Climatologist’s need money too. It’s a bad idea to kill the goose laying the golden eggs. I also find it odd that anthropogenic causes are at the root of climate change when the climate has been changing on its own since the beginning of time.

      Report Post »  
    • wvernon1981
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:31pm

      Something I said earlier:

      “97 percent of climatologists accept anthropogenic gasses as the current driver of climatic changes. There is no way for individuals to take a reasonable stance agains the consensus without years of education in climate science. Therefore, as we rely on the climatology community for our understanding of climate science, we need to ensure that the scientists are not allowing bias to creep into their research.”

      I’m all for ensuring the integrity of peer review process. My question to you is how do you know, as a layman (I’m assuming), you are on the right side of the science?

      Report Post »  
    • Rollo2
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:50pm

      “Wyvernon” admits himself that the “97%” of climatologists are making a guess, because they have no evidence of other forces at work. Is that not how Copernicus wound up in jail? … By presenting evidence that 97% of science disagreed with and was not willing to explore because Copernicus was undermining their authority?

      Report Post »  
    • wvernon1981
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:01pm

      You’re not actually understanding my point, I don’t think. I’m not saying climatologists are taking a guess as in an uneducated shot in the dark.

      Second, I’m saying non-climatologists have no expertise in the field. If you were to enter into a debate with a climatologist, as a layman, you would lose hands down. People do not know enough about climate science, in general, to have a valid position on the matter, based on their own understanding of the science. I am not taking the position that consensus makes truth. Only that the public should accept the consensus as the current best understanding of reality in any science all the while advocating mechanisms to prevent corruption of the peer review process.

      Report Post »  
    • Sue Dohnim
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 11:09pm

      @WVERNON1981

      Your logic is shaky here, on a few levels..

      Relying on experts for any “knowledge” is a fallacy, They can be wrong, biased, co-opted group-thinkers, ideologically or financially captured.
      If you read the science there is no real basis for AGW, the argument is based on isolating a variable C02 in an extremely complex system, applying a correlation based on very sloppy and unreliable temp data and then claiming causation. This is not science.
      The claim that the majority is pro AGW therefore it must be is false. Climate science is a NEW specified science and most of the people who claim this field are pro AGW. Just like all Gov economists are Keynesians, Virtually all climate scientists are pro AGW, if you are not, you will not get funding an have no job. Survivorship bias is pro, AGWers get funding, promotions and jobs.

      The Greenhouse gas claim is distorted and overstated. The experiment is done in a closed container and a C02 heating value is derived. Problem is the Earth is not a sealed container, it turns out that much more heat escapes than was thought and the feedbacks are not well understood. Nobody really fully understands from a scientific perspective what effect Co2 has in the real world.

      Basically, the Climate and its interactions is far too complex to isolate one small variable and claim it is the cause. Combine that with the solution, BIG GLOBAL GOVERNMENT and REGULATIONS, Climate Science is a political tool.

      Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
    • LemonyFresh
      Posted on May 25, 2012 at 1:22pm

      Wvernon… what about other planets that are heating up in our solar system? What are the martians doing about it? You can either answer or dodge the question. See what wikipedia says about it.

      Report Post » LemonyFresh  
    • MLOSuper
      Posted on May 25, 2012 at 4:55pm

      @ Vernon
      1: I have my qualifications as an astronomer to say a few things about climate science. I look through the atmosphere to get data, and I have to correct for certain chemicals in the atmosphere. The amount present changes the width and depth of spectral lines. The CO2 argument can be tossed out because of the change in CO2 over the last 50 years is negligible and can only account for a change of change of less than one thousandth of an Angstrom in width and less than one hundredth of a percent in depth.
      2: CO2 is NATURAL and was present on earth before O2 was present. O2 is the first pollutant on this planet.
      3: Enough SO2 and ash is emitted by the worlds volcanoes to raise and lower the earths temperature by a greater margin than any anthropogenic source. The two largest SO2 polluters on earth by source is Kilauea and Erta Ale in Ethopia. On average they spew a combined 1400 tons of SO2 gas per day.
      4: In order of strength of greenhouse affect: SO2, H20, NOx (there’s three of them), CO, CO2, then Hydrocarbons. Wikipedia articles actually neglects SO2 as a GHG, but it’s weight as an absorber is stronger than water by a factor of 10.

      Report Post » MLOSuper  
  • Sue Dohnim
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 6:33pm

    Ezra is great,,

    This is one of his best pieces…

    Occupy and Communist ideology.. and subversion of the West

    http://ezralevant.com/2012/05/occupy-communist-history.html

    Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
  • AvengerK
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 6:28pm

    Follow the money indeed.
    This is nothing but a shakedown by corruptocracies around the world.
    In Al Gore’s work of fiction, “An Inconvenient Truth”, he points to several islands, including Tuvalu, claiming that because of melting polar ice, “the citizens of these Pacific nations all had to evacuate to New Zealand”.
    The Deputy Prime Minister of Tuvalu, Tavau Teii, said that “major greenhouse polluters should pay Tuvalu for the impacts of climate change”. Ah…the shoe drops.

    Tuvalu’s problem is not climate change, it’s that the island was never meant for modern habitation. The country’s primary vegetable crop, taro, has been grossly over-farmed. There is no fresh water available on the island nation, only what can be stored from rain. Much of the population uses the island’s lagoon for bathing and toilet facilities. The island nation has to ship its waste to landfills in Fiji and New Zealand.

    But here’s the best part…Stockholm University professor Nils-Axel Mörner said that sea levels around the Maldives and Tuvalu have fallen roughly 11 inches in the past 50 years.

    Report Post »  
  • HorseCrazy
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 6:23pm

    I am confused you mean I should be questioning polar bear farts causing acid rain? next you will tell me the earth has natural cycles of weather

    Report Post »  
  • WhimsyB
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 6:18pm

    Ezra Levant is my hero. I would LOVE for him to be a guest on GBTV. I urge Americans who might not know much about Levant to study up on him. He is amazing!

    Report Post »  
  • BurntHills
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 6:14pm

    ”global warming” aka The four Seasons aka The WEATHER… is the most Absolute biggest money-making fraud scam and con job ever perped on Humanity by the communist Left there ever was. “The sky is falling!” cried Chicken Little… that simple little children’s book gave some commie one helluva idea how to MAKE MONEY. And their front man: Al Gore.

    Report Post » BurntHills  
  • wvernon1981
    Posted on May 24, 2012 at 6:05pm

    It seems the bigger issue is bias creeping into research. What mechanisms can be put into place in order to keep the scientific process objective?

    Report Post »  
    • Banter
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 6:25pm

      It’s not bias creeping into the research, it’s reality. This cult is being exposed for what it is, and people are finally understanding, it’s about the money, Money that is stolen from each and every one of us, laundered through the UN, and redistributed to third world holes, and elitist pockets.

      Global warming is theft on a grand scale.

      Report Post » Banter  
    • wvernon1981
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 6:48pm

      97 percent of climatologists accept anthropogenic gasses as the current driver of climatic changes. There is no way for individuals to take a reasonable stance agains the consensus without years of education in climate science. Therefore, as we rely on the climatology community for our understanding of climate science, we need to ensure that the scientists are not allowing bias to creep into their research.

      Report Post »  
    • Banter
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:04pm

      Wvernon1981

      I appreciate your passion for this subject. But come on, the reality is this is a very well designed process to steal the wealth of the US and redistribute it to elitists and third world dictators. For every statistic you provide there is another statistic that refutes it.

      The product is money, the manufacturers are bought and paid for “scientists”, and marketing is Gore, the Clintons, et al. The UN is where the money is laundered.

      Report Post » Banter  
    • wvernon1981
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:18pm

      Throw some evidence at me then.

      Report Post »  
    • Banter
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 7:45pm

      Back at ya Vern.

      Show me any evidence that says we are creating global warming.

      I’d like to see your response to AvengerK above.

      Report Post » Banter  
    • Rollo2
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:01pm

      The “bias” is ALREADY in the research! The University grants are going to scientists with a biased opinion! The peer reviews are only going to researchers who share the same opinion!

      The researchers on the AGW side are still stonewalling on releasing their raw data!

      There is a LIE being perpetrated here, a FRAUD against every person on the planet, and I’ll not stop resisting until I see the Raw data and the manipulations that were fed into the computer models that were used to develop this doomsday scenario!

      Report Post »  
    • wvernon1981
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:03pm

      I should have specified: evidence that climate scientists are bought and paid for.

      Report Post »  
    • Rollo2
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:07pm

      Wvernon is a puppet, unable to think for himself he follows the UN, who he has been told are the salvation of the planet.

      Pity him his lack of common sense.

      Report Post »  
    • Banter
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:22pm

      Ok Vern,

      How about you start with the Climatic Research Institute email debacle.

      Report Post » Banter  
    • wvernon1981
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:27pm

      “The peer reviews are only going to researchers who share the same opinion!”

      This claim could be made of any science. Do you think all science should be discredited for this reason?

      Report Post »  
    • wvernon1981
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:38pm

      Michael Mann was cleared of academic misconduct by several academic panels:

      http://www.skepticalscience.com/Climategate-CRU-emails-hacked.htm

      Report Post »  
    • Sue Dohnim
      Posted on May 24, 2012 at 10:53pm

      @WVERNON1981

      Man was exonerated by a panel of his pro AGW buddies. It was a shame investigation.

      Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
    • Sue Dohnim
      Posted on May 25, 2012 at 1:06am

      ha, typos

      Mann … sham

      Report Post » Sue Dohnim  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In