AP Analysis: For Gingrich, No Bombast or Apologies
- Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:16am by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »
AP
WASHINGTON (AP) — Newt Gingrich is trying to preserve his rapid rise in the GOP presidential race by defending his most controversial stands without appearing to be the thin-skinned hothead his critics often describe.
The former House speaker seemed to accomplish that goal in Saturday’s debate in Iowa. His challenge will be to sustain the strategy while rivals attack him on the airwaves and the ground, and to convince conservative voters that he’s their champion despite his occasional departures from orthodoxy.
Polls suggest Gingrich is the likeliest alternative to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney heading into the leadoff Iowa caucuses on Jan. 3. So far, he has reacted with a steely calm.
He may ruffle feathers by telling unpleasant truths, Gingrich says, but he‘s not such an incendiary politician that he’s unworthy of being commander in chief.
In the latest debate, Gingrich admitted wrongdoing and regret in only one area: the marital infidelities involved in his two divorces.
“I said upfront, openly, I’ve made mistakes at times,” he said. “I’ve had to go to God for forgiveness.” Voters have every right to examine such matters, he said, and “people have to render judgment.”
Noting that he is “a 68-year-old grandfather,” Gingrich added: “I am delighted at the way people have been willing to look at who I am, to look at what my record has been.”
The answer seemed to defuse the potentially emotional issue. The debate quickly moved to other topics, on which Gingrich was less apologetic.
Reuters
He defended his former support for requiring people to obtain health insurance, saying it once was a popular stand with conservatives.
“In 1993, in fighting HillaryCare, virtually every conservative saw the mandate as a less-dangerous future than what Hillary was trying to do,” Gingrich said.
Hillary Rodham Clinton was leading the health care effort for her husband, President Bill Clinton.
“I frankly was floundering, trying to find a way to make sure that people who could afford it were paying their hospital bills, while still leaving an out so libertarians could not buy insurance,” Gingrich said. “It’s now clear that the mandate, I think, is clearly unconstitutional. ”
Mandated health insurance is at the heart of the 2010 federal law passed at President Barack Obama’s urging, and many conservatives despise it. It also is featured in the Massachusetts law pushed by Romney when he was governor.
The other GOP candidates painted both men as too liberal on the topic.
“Newt Romney” will be unable to challenge Obama credibly on health care, said Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota.
Romney has stayed at or near the top of the GOP polls for months, while others rose and fell. He has more money and organization than Gingrich. But some conservatives still revere Gingrich for his role in the 1994 Republican takeover of the House majority, and for his decades of writing books and making speeches about his political philosophies.
Romney renewed his effort to portray Gingrich as too erratic and bombastic to be president. The topic was Gingrich’s recent assertion that Palestinians are an “invented” people, a description that suggests Palestinians have no legitimate claim to their own state in the Middle East. That would run counter to long-term U.S. policy and to Israeli efforts to find a two-state solution to the region’s turmoil.
It was “a mistake on the speaker’s part,” Romney said. “We’re going to tell the truth, but we’re not going to throw incendiary words into a place which is a boiling pot when our friends, the Israelis, would probably say, `What in the world are you doing?’”
“I’m not a bomb thrower, rhetorically or literally,” Romney said.
Gingrich didn’t back down. “I feel quite confident an amazing number of Israelis found it nice to have an American tell the truth,” he said.
Gingrich cast himself as a risk-taking, unorthodox politician in that regard, but at other times he played by the rules. He made a pitch to supporters of Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum by praising the two on constitutional and Iran policies, respectively.
As before, Romney contrasted his many years as a businessman with Gingrich’s two decades in Congress and lengthy career as a Washington-based consultant.
Gingrich shot back: “The only reason you didn’t become a career politician is you lost to Teddy Kennedy in 1994″ in a Senate race.
The debate offered one of the last chances for second-tier candidates to gain traction before voting starts in Iowa and, one week later, in the New Hampshire primary Jan. 10.
Perry avoided the gaffes that have hurt him before, and reasserted his claim to be a job-creating leader with no Washington ties. The nation needs lower taxes, less regulation and more common sense, he said, “and an outsider like Rick Perry is going to do that.”
Rep. Ron Paul of Texas drew loud cheers from fans of his libertarian philosophies. Iowa Republicans say it’s conceivable that Paul could win in Iowa next month.
But many party insiders say Paul’s positions are too radical for mainstream America. Examples include his call for extraordinarily deep cuts in federal spending and services.
“If we took that oath of office seriously in Washington,” Paul said in the debate, “we’d get rid of 80 percent of the government.”
With former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman skipping the debate and businessman Herman Cain gone from the race, the stage contained only six candidates. That gave Bachmann and Santorum, who have struggled in the polls, a bit more time before the cameras.
Given the campaign’s ups and downs, and Romney’s inability to pull away, perhaps Bachmann or Santorum will make a late surge. But Gingrich is drawing the main attention for now. His calm-but-unapologetic style will be tested over the next three weeks.
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 684 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 647 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 523 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 361 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 314 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 172 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 210 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 146 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Scathing New Ad Capitalizes on Rep. Ryan‘s ’Fading Obama Posters’ Remark 124 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 172 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (308)
READRIGHTHERE
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:56pmWe don’t need another legislator in chief. Great nations are not built in the halls of their capitals, they are created by the labor, ingenuity, and tenacity of their people. Our government has grown too big for its britches, our economic base cannot support the massive head perched on its neck. The government needs to get out of the way. Gingrich is an intellect and well read, but his only practical experience is in the halls of our capital. We need his ability to think, but we do not in anyway shape or form need his habits of doing.
Its ludicrous to me that Gingrich’s new supporters continue to attack Romney for flip flopping. Have you seen the plethora of Gingrich’s own statements over the years? The argument no longer holds water. Romney has better claim to political evolution in thought than Gingrich, whose new found conservatism is a more recent acquisition.
Stick to the basics. Gingrich has never created a job. Romney has created thousands. Gingrich has never governed anything (the House of Representatives doesn’t count). Gingrich is an idea man, Romney is an application man. Gingrich’s infidelities indicate much more than the foibles of youth or fluctuating testosterone levels. You are either the kind of person that can flippantly disregard promises and oaths (vows) when convenience or entertainment demand or you are not. Romney is not.
Gingrich vs. Romney re: the economy? Romney, hands down. Gingrich talks the talk, but that’s it.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:07pmThe government shouldn’t be in the “job creation business.” You see Obama doing that and it’s a disaster. What ever happened to free market enterprise. It’s time for the government to get out of the way and let jobs/businesses grow!
Government is NOT a business:
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bq0kv4n5Yfs
Watchingtheweasels
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:13pmReality: no one but Paul is dedicated to fixing it. Perhaps Bachman.
>But many party insiders say Paul’s positions are too radical for mainstream America. Examples >include his call for extraordinarily deep cuts in federal spending and services.
We are broke. Only two choices exist: extraordinarily deep cuts in federal spending and service (ie the size and scope of government) or printing our way into a hyperinflationary disaster that destroys the purchasing power of every American. Your choice.
Report Post »TheePolitinator
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:14pmRomney has and is a soros funded puppet. Go ahead and vote Obama back in. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. I was a 40 year MASS resident and I saw the prelude to romney care. And mass is destroyed. taxes through the roof, job creation stalled. Unemployment up. More and more out of pocket expenses for your health care. And overall food prices worse then anywheres else. Romney is a tool and always will be. Get a grip and vote on merit. Romneys record speaks for its self. PUPPET
Report Post »Tagudinian
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:28pmOkay so you are a Romney supporter. Fine. That is your choice. Stick to it. Don’t badmouth other candidates to make your candidate look good. Such a technique doesn’t work. It also discounts most of your commentary as worthless.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:33pmI’ve been looking at the Gallup daily polls and the RCP average nationally. I think Gingrich has peaked. He was 37% on the 6th and now down to 33% today. He’s on the downside of the curve now. This trend should put him in the high 20′s by the end of next week. Flavor of the week, gone just like the rest.
It’s time to look at Ron Paul and Mitt Romney for the Presidency. They’re the only 2 standing. Both can defeat Obama, so say national polls.
Report Post »quicker
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:50pmY`all keep harping on who`s the best canidate ,the problem is how many of you are even going to vote in the primarys.Also how many that have the chance to vote out congressmen and women that have had more than two or three terms in office ,Y`all keep harping on term limits ,well we have them and they are called primarys.Bottom line is this ,if we don`t change congress and senate in the primarys then don`t exspect to have a goverment that is afraid of us their employers.Remember a good goverment is one that knows that they canlose their jobs the time to take back our goverment is in the primarys.Kick the incombent out and start over.VOTE IN THE PRIMARYS.
Report Post »GONESURFING
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:02pmGingrich would be wiped out by Obama and we need to beat Obama no matter what.
Report Post »TTEXASTYLER
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:05pmGreat post. Sound logic and accurate conclusions.
Report Post »blue_sky
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:26pm.
BREAKING NEWS:
Gingrich is caught lying AGAIN.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCQCsugd0h8
(I think he is finished.)
.
Report Post »AhLeahIris
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:37pmI disagree about Gingrich v. Romney. That said, I love how the DNC’s anti-Gingrich ad is backfiring:
Report Post »http://wp.me/p1HGwx-1H3
LOL!!!!!!!
bestartist
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:00pmI totally disagree with you.
Report Post »Yesterday, before the debate in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Romney said , “Islam is a religion of Peace”.
That is, simply, a candyass talking point. Islam is NOT a religion of Peace. That sounds like something John McCain probably said in the last election. If we want more BS, we can simply stick with Obama.
I am impressed with Newt Gingrich, his ideas, and his unwillingness to be bamboozled.
suzy000
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:11pmWhile everything you said is partially true there are other half truths not mentioned that should be to be fair. His time in the House gave Clinton the success he enjoys right to this day. It was policies that the Gingrich House put in place that they had to drag Clinton kicking and screaming to in order to have wonderul growth in America. Do I think Gingrich is a moderate Republican…you bet I do. But he has enough sense to know that America has gone conservative and he will be out on his nose just like any other Republican who does not rule from center right….that I promise you. I am still hoping for a Perry win, however.
Report Post »Knight Templar
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 8:29pmIf we are going to argue Romney vs. Gingrich we have been successfully distracted. They are both big government Republicans. We should be looking at the other candidates(except Hunstman/RINO).
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 8:33pmPlease support Gov Rick Perry for President…a conservative AND a veteran..GOD BLESS
http://www.rickperry.org/
Gov. Rick Perry…
“The idea this president now, with Iran getting one of our predator drones in their possession, and he had opportunities — he had two choices. Actually, he had three. He chose the worse. And those two opportunities he had was to either retrieve that drone or to destroy it. And he did the worst of the three. And he did absolutely nothing. And the Russians and the Chinese will have our highly technical equipment now. This president IS the problem,” Perry said at the ABC News debate in Des Moines, Iowa
Report Post »ramburner
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 8:46pmI agree BUT…. Newt is slick! Perry, Newt and Romney ARE NOT the man! Newt is a polished Romney in sheep’s clothing. He is really a democrat. Perry is a republicrat because he started as a democrat. Why do you think they are surging in the polls? Why are the media pushing all that they say? Something is NOT right when the media are actively promoting their message and slamming Bachmann and Santorum. The media finally wore a hole in Cain and he burst! WAKE UP America! If we elect Newt or Romney or Perry, we get Obama light! Whatever the media is doing, RUN the other way! We will only have this last chance to elect someone who will even try to bring us back to where we were before Wilson and FDR. Other than Potus; the 2012 election is a good time to clean house and get rid of ALL the Progressives in each party! Don’t know who they are? Then use this rule of thumb; if they have been in office for more than 2 terms – GET RID OF THEM! We MUST have Term Limits in order to keep this problem at bay and controllable in the future; otherwise this country is lost! Research the Candidates background on the web BEFORE voting. If they have voted for Progressive laws and pushed Progressive policies; chances are – THEY ARE PROGRESSIVE! Return to God and the Constitution.
Report Post »ltb
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 8:55pmThere’s just something sleazy about Romney. When Romney is asked for a yes or no answer, he’ll give a five minute response to a question that wasn’t even asked. Plus I’m sick of PC people like him and certainly don’t want them to feel welcome in the Republican Party – couldn’t care less how many elections that makes us lose. Romney is a typical politician who never gives a straight answer.
As far as Newt flip-flopping, I think he has evolved. I’m about the most conservative person I know, but when I was younger, I thought it was a good idea to vote for liberal judges and conservative legislators/presidents. My reasoning was that I wanted liberals in charge of my rights and conservatives in charge of my tax dollars. Looking back, I CAN’T BELIEVE HOW STUPID I WAS and now I understand that liberals should not be allowed anywhere near our government. Anyway, Newt doesn’t tap dance around questions and if he changed his mind about something, you can rest assured that it wasn’t because of political expediency, it was because of maturity and wisdom.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 9:07pmSo YOU would prefer Mitt OR Newt….NOT ME
Veterans are supporting a VETERAN….Gov Rick Perry
Report Post »Our military deserves a Commander In Chief they can be PROUD of and RESPECT
GOD BLESS OUR BRAVE MILITARY AND OUR BELOVED BRAVE VETERANS
http://www.rickperry.org/veterans/
superman
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:42pm@WEST COAST PATRIOT…………….Thank you, and keep it up. We need you on the Blaze
Report Post »stopspendingourmoney
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 12:35pmIf anyone cares about the Constitution and our dollar, better look into Ron Paul, the only one that can save the US dollar and the country from going bankrupt, your choice America…..God help, and bless us all..
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 1:36pmGingrich lied to Greta too, when he said “very few knew of the housing bubble” (When Greta asked him why he didn’t see it) Congressmen had been warning of that collapse for years!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=dh4VFRx7ra0#t=67s
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 1:37pmBTW Gingrich poll numbers are falling like a rock! Down 17 points in a few days!
Report Post »DrFrost
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 5:10pmRomney: I like what he says, but I don’t trust him to do it. And, as Bachman says, he won’t be able to challenge Obama on health care during debates. I also don‘t like the fact that he’s getting so negative with his political ads. I think he would do well versus Obama in any presidential debates other than on healthcare which the MSM will almost certainly harp on if Romney gets the nomination. In fact, I predict that if Romney gets the nomination that one whole debate will be dedicated to health care.
Newt: Has, IMO, won all but one of the debates (which i gave to Romney). He’s the smartest man on the stage time after time. Intelligence is not the only attribute I’m looking for. It’s not even the most important… but it certainly helps. He certainly has baggage, but he also has some very impressive acheivements that appeal to conservatives. And Newt would absolutely wipe the floor with Obama in debates.
Dr. Paul: Being a libertarian, I love his views on the domestic front. But his ideas on foreign policy is, IMO, wrong. I‘m also not sure how well he’d work with congress or how he’d do against Obama in debates.
My favorite candidate is still Gary Johnson but he‘s stated that if he doesn’t do well in NH he’ll be pulling out so I may well be choosing between Ron and Newt. I like Bachman but you know if she gets the nomination the MSM will crucify her. The only thing worse than an unbeliever (non-liberal) is a heretic (minority non-liberal).
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:55pmHas anyone else noticed that the news media has conveniently forgot towon thr announce who won the debate? It’s very obvious Dr Ron Paul did and they are keeping Americans in the dark? EVERYTIME they think they have a poll that makes Dr Ron Paul look behind they make it front page news. And why in every article like this one they talk about an newt first, they always almost menyion Dr Ron Paul as if they are determining for you that he is not important. THE TRUTH IS that newts numbersvare sinking, Americans are rejecting newt because of his adultery etc and they know Romneyvon is way behind Dr Ron Paul…But I believe Dear Patriots most of you notice this too.
Report Post »nueces
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:15pmI don’t have much against Paul. He makes a lot of sense. But he has as much chance of being elected POTUS as SarkozY of France has of being elected POTUS. This is why I believe Paulistas must be somehow mentally deficient or perhaps drug addled. Ron Paul could NEVER be elected president. Absolutely impossible. Is Perot still alive? Why don‘t y’all dredge him up and run him? You’d have a better chance.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:16pmNo. Actually, I ignore Paul all together!
Report Post »escape_from_socialism
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:53pmRon Paul won by a “small margin”
8,746 votes of which 6,500 plus were in Paul’s corner
http://www.huntingtonnews.net/15950
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:59pmTHE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE,
Report Post »Who “won” the debate is not a concrete number. It’s a matter of opinion. You had Ron Paul the “winner” before the debate even started. Did you want the media to report that?
YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:12pm> ESCAPE. Please, please don‘t tell me that’s an “on-line poll” result? I don’t click on links, I’m tempted, but I would rather have you state it to show you’re a bigger rube than a Scientologist. Lmfao!
Report Post »spankadonkey
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:31pmIf Paul won anything it is only because his Paulbutz manipulated the vote as they usually do. If you think Paul won the debate then you must have missed all of it except where he babbled. Even the post-debate commentators didn’t mention Paul. Only his crazed supporters take him seriously and for the life of me, I can’t figure out why. He has never “peaked” like other candidates and he never will. He has never accomplished anything of significance and he is unelectable.
Report Post »ltb
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 9:14pmRon Paul will never be president. He sounds great, right up to the point when he says Iran should have nuclear weapons because Israel has them and then you realize he’s insane. It would be like a presidential candidate in the 1940s saying that the Soviets should have the atomic bomb, because America has it.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 9:29pmYep, it is an online poll, which is the best place to get your news. I guess you just are a sheep relying on the MSM to get all your info. Tells me a lot about you and your mentality. You don’t click on links because you are afraid of the truth . Say hi to your family for me.
Report Post »superman
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:32pm@Spankamonkey “Even the post-debate commentators didn’t mention Paul”………… I don’t think you can be helped, so just move along and do as your told, this will make for a good sheeple. But please, do not try to debate the rest of us free thinkers, we have too much clarity for sheeple like you to understand. Sorry
Report Post »garyM
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:44pmRon Paul moved out in front of Romney in the latest poll or Romney moved down one, I don’t know which. Newt has a comfortable lead. I think many Ron Paul supporters were Obama supporters last election and they are now understandably soured on Obama over the economy. Ron Paul and Obama have a similar foreign policy!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:50pmGARYM, you should do more research and less “idle thinking.” Your statements baffle me in their lack of knowledge and outright name-calling.
Report Post »All Pro
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:52pmPaul wouldn‘t have have expanded the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan and he wouldn’t have waged war against Libya and he definitely wouldn’t wage war with out a declaration from congress!
Report Post »Try again.
martinez012577
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:55pmDamn you are dumb.
“Ron Paul and Obama have a similar foreign policy!”
Has Obama closed any bases? Has he ended any wars and brought our troops home? Has he started any new wars or sent our troops into any new countries without proper authorization from congress( declaration of war )? Has he secured our foreign borders?
Stupid comments prove the anti paul crowd are dumb and ill informed. Look up facts, come back and try again.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:05pmGary, Gary, Gary, you are really misinformed. To research on the internet, first, go to a search engine, second, type in a candidates name, third, read all the stories (not just one), next, if they have a political record in Congress, go to http://www.house.gov/ and/or http://www.senate.gov/
That is just a starter lesson.
Report Post »anniebsings
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:16pmyou people always say that Paul won everything; the sane people realize that, although he has a few good points, he is a whiney crazy man!
Report Post »Watchingtheweasels
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:22pmI‘ve been skeptical about Ron Paul’s foreign policy. However, I’m far more skeptical of the economic policy of the likes of Gingrich/Romney/Huntsman/Perry. Big government has brought us to financial ruin. If we do not drastically cut the size of government we will see this sort of a hyperinflationary disaster (http://www.kevinpezzi.com/blog/images/German_mark_burn_for_heat.jpg). That link is a picture of a German burning deutschmarks to keep warm.
It is far more likely that Ron Paul will correct his foreign policy deficiencies when he gets presidential briefings about the true facts about Islam than the other proponents of big government will ever turn us away from our current course to a hyperinflationry disaster.
So the choice is clear: Paul to preserve your wealth, or the others to ensure that you won’t be able to afford a potato at the grocery store in a handful of years.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:28pmRegardless of the particulars, many liberals ARE coming to Paul. Paulistinians brag about it! Which doesn’t speak well for Paul or his supporters in my opinion. They claim Paul is the most conservative candidate and “founded” the Tea Party. So if those delusions were true, then why would a liberal have anything to do with him? Paul, although right on some economic issues, is out in left field on others. Right where the liberals are. Paul would be at least as damaging to the country as Obama, if not worse, and would just destroy America with a different strategy than Obama.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:37pmRon Paul is the most Conservative of all the candidates. He does have a plan to stop the spending and get our fiscal house in order. Mitt and/or Newt will not stop the spending. They are rich Croni’s that are lying to you. If you cannot see that then you are completely blind. Paul is the only candidate that takes his oath to protect and defend the Constitution seriously. Newt has voted for and helped passed two anti 2nd amendment bills in Congress and Mitt has signed anti 2nd amendment laws as Governor. Paul on the other hand tried to introducee a bill to give back all 2nd amendment rights to the people that have been taken away over the years but fought by Progressives. Wake up people or you are going to be sorry you did not when the collapse happens and they really start coming after our weapons. Unless, of course, you are one of those looking forward to war here on our soil.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:58pmGary just throws up all over himself everytime he thinks
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:11pmRational, Paul did start the Tea Party in his run for the nomination in 2007. The liberals,as you say, are actually blue dog Dems, disenfranchised with BO, that are coming over to Paul. Do not confuse the two. Paul has the ability to reach beyond party lines and work with all. Isn’t that what Americans have been asking for? Ending partisan politics and getting something done in Washington? Paul can do this and restore our Constitution and end the fiscal mess we are in. Wake up.
Report Post »David
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:43pmI think it’s interesting how people who attack Ron Paul never attack him on specifics. They say “he has terrible foreign policy,” but there are never any specifics.
They also say, “Ron Paul is great but has no chance to be elected.” If everyone who has said that would vote for him, Ron Paul would win 60% of the vote.
Furthermore, Ron Paul takes his oath seriously and respects the powers given to him in the Constitution like no other candidate.
If you want to pick Romney or Gingrich, feel free to do so, but we have gone down that road before. The end result may be delayed, but it is the same destination as Obama.
Report Post »cassandra
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:37pmGARYM are you kidding me Ron Paul would bring our troops home to defend our borders obama wants to spead them all over the middle east and leave our borders open
Report Post »Joyce D
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:43pmWhy is it that Republicans are automatically against any freedom fighting Nation seeking independence? The Invented People only want self -determination. Republicans support their ethnic cleansing. Newt said they had a chance to go back where they came from. He must now expound on how the Israelis will forcibly remove them from Judea and Samaria.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:52pm“The Invented People only want self -determination.”
If that were true, then why do they continually fire rockets into Israel? Blowing up schools and butchering families and calling for the annihilation of the Jewish people????
Why have they always broken their promises to the peace process and “stalled” the process for decades? Do you really think that if Israel really desired “ethnic cleansing” that they could not have achieved that by now? Your statements are made out of pure ignorance and possibly anti-semetism.
Here is a little video lesson for you to educate yourself, just in case you are interested in knowing the truth.
Israel Palestinian Conflict: The Truth About the Peace Process:
Report Post »Israel’s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Danny Ayalon explains the historical facts relating to the Israeli Palestinian conflict. The video explains that the reason there is no successful peace process is because of decades of Palestinian and Arab recalcitrance and the main reason for the conflict is not Israel’s presence in the West Bank, but successive Palestinian leaders resistance to Jewish sovereignty.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAuBc_cbXo0
Rational Man
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:55pmIsrael Palestinian Conflict: The Truth About the West Bank:
Israel’s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Danny Ayalon explains the historical facts relating to the Israeli Palestinian conflict. The video explains where the terms “West Bank”, “occupied territories” and “67 Borders” originated and how they are incorrectly used and applied.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGYxLWUKwWo
West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:59pmFaith, notice how long it takes for Progressives to answer when you call them out for what they are. Example, Rational’s post from another story:
“If they fire Sharpton on the basis of his performance, credibility, and relevance, then they would have to fire everyone else that they employ who sits in front of a camera to be fair.”
Communist, Marxist mentality. Al Sharpton fair?? This is what these people believe. Pay them no mind.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:13pm@West Coast Patriot
Your mentally ill and deranged. Your searching the website to troll my posts and your too ignorant to get the point that I made. Therefore making an utter fool of yourself.
The point I made, (that went right over your head), was that if Sharpton deserved to be fired, then going by the standards that they fired Sharpton, “to be fair”, they would have to fire all the people in front of a camera on MSNBC. In other words, moron, they should fire them all. I never called Sharpton fair. Your an idiot that just can’t get enough of embarrassing yourself. You should get some meds or something!
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 9:25pmThe facts are the facts, you said the dumba** post. You are a Marxist, no matter what. Get a life Al lover you.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:36pm@West Coast Patriot
I repeat, “Your an idiot that just can’t get enough of embarrassing yourself.”
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:41pmGingrich is a two step artist, a slick willie politician who double speaks.
Here’s a clue when considering the meaning of a Bill being proposed for Law. FIRST AND FOREMOST weigh it by the Constitution. You don’t wait and see what the currant is like, or if it appears to be something that could be “sold” (as in a bag of goods) to Americans. If it even appears as those it has to be pigeonholed in through a broad reading of the Constitution, you reject it out of hand, and never give it a second thought.
You don‘t measure whether or not it’s politically expedient, you measure it by the Constitution.
Gingrich? Go have intercourse with yourself. You are a fraud, a liar, and probably worse than the idiot who’s currently in the White House.
Report Post »libh8er
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:47pmNervous much?
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:52pmThe article read “He may ruffle feathers by telling unpleasant truths, Gingrich says, but he‘s not such an incendiary politician that he’s unworthy of being commander in chief.”
What this really means is that he severely ANGERS real conservatives because he supports the false science of Global Warming. He looks ridiculous posing as a conservative when he is really a neocon… and NEOCONS ARE WARMONGERING LIBERALS. Of course he is “incendiary”…the man is a liar with his pants on fire, and global warming is stuck on a telephone wire.
It isn’t an “unpleasant truth”, it’s the opposite of an INCONVENIENT TRUTH, it’s a CONVENIENT LIE (politically expedient boulderdash)!
Gingrich is unelectable.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:57pmNervous about what exactly? That another communist like Gingrich would get voted in to further destroy America? Do the math idiot.
Report Post »Tagudinian
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:31pmChill out. Your comment sounds sophomoric.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:40pm10th used to be cool, calm and collected. He was actually well written for awhile, then it all started to fall apart for him. Lol.
Report Post »Hazzard
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:44pmGingrich a Communist? When you throw out such comments you underscore your lack of credibility, even more so than when you make somewhat profane illusions. The Free Dictionary defines Communism as “1. a theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members”. Please explain how you believe that Gingrich is against private ownership and supports a group mentality. If you cannot, please desist in making inane comments.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:52pm@ Tagudinian
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:31pm
Chill out. Your comment sounds sophomoric.
Report Post »———————————————————————————————
Chilling out is what turned this Country into the pot of fools that it is. Say what you mean, and mean what you say. This Country is teetering. The day of being reasonable with idiots is over.
The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:04pm@ Hazzard
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:44pm
Gingrich a Communist? When you throw out such comments you underscore your lack of credibility, even more so than when you make somewhat profane illusions.
Report Post »——————————————————————————————————————————————-
He would be a mirror double for Putin with policy. Show ANYTHING that Gingrich has proposed that aligns with the Constitution of the United States. ANYTHING. I’ll wait.
Rational Man
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:24pmPaulitis disease will do that to a person. Makes them crazy irrational liars in need of drug legalization to make it easier to medicate themselves. Which then makes them even more paraniod. It’s a vicious circle which leads to total insanity. If allowed to go unchecked, many will fall under the spell of Paulitis disease which leads to social upheaval and anarchy and the down fall of nations. Having this disease should require the confiscation of the aflicted’s firearms because their delusions lead them to believe that authority is their enemy and vow to make war with law enforcement personel, which is in place to keep people like these under control and law abiding. Read the words of most Paulistinians and see for yourselves!
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:46pmRational, I see you as delusional. Not at anytime has Paul voiced an opinion of legalizing drugs. He is for Constitutional principles and having the states make the laws according to the people who live in the state and reducing the size of the Federal Government to the way it should be. All you Progressives are either mindless idiots or you just like to lie. You must believe in BO saying the Constitution is full of negative liberties. Pathetic.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:54pmLol… very good RATIONAL!
Like John Wayne said in True Grit. “By that time your leg will be swollen up tighter than Dick’s Hatband! Mortified and they’ll cut it off.”
These guys in general are wound up tighter than Dick’s Hatband, and being a Paul supporter, they’re cutting off their noses to spite the face.
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:56pmIt’s all bueno 10th, I get exasperated with all the ridiculous comments we have to knock out of the park, but if we don‘t then we wouldn’t have the opportunity to show off the little wolves in sheep’s clothing prancing around the Republican Party. Heeeeeere little neo-con neo-con ;)
YepImaNeocon – I‘ve never seen you post anything seriously intelligent that would make me honestly question Ron Paul’s views viz-a-viz Conservatism. What the foreign policy? You’re seriously going to say nation building is Conservative? When you bring up the name Rockwell, Rothbard and Anarcho-Capitalism like you’ve invoked some Ron Paul kryptonite, I laugh at you. So what, Lou Rockwell, the guy has fantastic economic principles, he happens to be from the Austrian school. Rothbard, big time ditto. What, want to talk crap about Mises and Hayek too? Go for it you‘ll paint yourself as the biggest Keynesian I’ve ever seen and I’ll have fun throttling you on this site where ever I see you, you little big-government-bailout-keynesian-tarp-lover you :) Yes, your choices are down to Austrians and Keynesians – or socialists but oddly enough a huge number of socialists are… Keynesian.
Report Post »I like others tell you the truth and you continually ignore it (though you‘ve turned from saying Ron Paul is a complete liberal to saying he’s now 1/4 conservative and completely conservative on fiscal matters – I’ll give you that) Alright cupcake, comment away.
My Faith
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:18pmRational just showed how irrational and stupid she is.
Rational is a good little useful idiot who grabs her ankles when daddy Obama tells her.
Rational can’t think for herself so she needs daddy Obama to tell her what to say and how to say it.
Rational is a loser and hates America as well as the Constitution. Rational is a communist…Rational is a loser!
Report Post »rush_is_right
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:24pm@my faith..
can’t you come up with any new insults? oh yeah that would take intelligence..sorry…LOL
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:24pmOh! And did I mention that other symptoms of Paulitis disease include demonizing anyone who doesn’t agree with them, making false accusations, making threats, false scenaros, aimless ranting, agitation and hyper-activity, arrogance, superiority complex, sociapathic behavior with the belief that they are never wrong and will lie profusely to cover up for their broken ideology and a cult affiliation whose leader is believed to be infallible and resembles Yoda. Many in this cult also believe they are Luke Skywalker, clinging to Yoda’s every word and ready to carry out his comands.
It’s a long, yet incomplete, list of debilitating symptoms that cause the aflicted ones to become a curse to the society in which they exsist.
Report Post »No definitive cure for this disease has been developed for this affliction. But fronal lobotomy has been suggested by professionals familar with these poor sick people.
Hazzard
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:26pmGingrich a Communist? When you throw out such comments you underscore your lack of credibility, even more so than when you make somewhat profane illusions.
——————————————————————————————————————————————-
He would be a mirror double for Putin with policy. Show ANYTHING that Gingrich has proposed that aligns with the Constitution of the United States. ANYTHING. I’ll wait.
10th Amendment answered a specific question on a statement he had made about Newt’s political philosophy with another question. This is easily translatable as “I can’t” . So 10th threw out an accusation about Newt being a communist and he has not one thing to say to support it. Oh, just a minute, he said he would be a mirror image of Putin with policy. Carefully note, however, that this is making use of a future tense, “would be” which clearly says that up to this point, 10th can think of nothing to justify the use of such a derogatory label. In terms of the future, unless 10th is clairvoyant, 10th cannot speak to that either.
Report Post »sledgehammer44
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:29pmNewt said he has asked for forgiveness from Jesus about his sins of the past and as a Christian we should accept that until he proves otherwise. He has been faithful to his curent wife for many years so I believe he is a changed man. I could be wrong but time will tell. I feel Newt is by far the most intelligent man on the stage and is able to articulate his point of view the best, thus in my oppinion giving us the best chance to defeat Obama in a debate and then the election. While Ron Paul is clearly an intelligent man he often times has a difficultly conveying with clarity his message. His son Rand is much better at articulating his ideas and if his son ever runs I will vote for him in a heartbeat, but at this point in time I believe Newt is our best choice to get the ship going back in the right direction and then hopefully he will go with a more conservative person for VP and we can then get the country back on track.
Report Post »My Faith
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:43pmLook at how stupid Rush_is_right, YepImALoser, and Irrational are. They come on a thread about Newt but only post Negatives about Ron Paul. Seems you 3 are obsessed with Ron Paul. You act worse then what you say his supporters do. Idiots!
Rush_is_Right-You don’t know your head from your rear. Shut up your dumb. Now sign into your other name.
Rational-What are you trying to accomplish by antagonizing Ron Paul supporters? Exactly, your a loser looking for trouble.
YepImALoser-You are just an old has been who is progressive. You believe Government should dictate every citizens way of life. Progressive idiot! You also said you voted for Obama. Loser!
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:43pmMAN!
Report Post »There are so many symptoms of Paulitis that I forgot the most prevelant symptom of all. The most recognizable personality trait that literally defines the Paulistinians, (as they have come to be known). It’s a symptom that is common in even the earliest stages of Paulitis. So common that I overlooked it in my previous list of symptoms. So common that it is just accepted as normal in any conversation with a Paulistinian. The symptom of name calling falls under the demonizing catagory of symptoms but because it is so prevelant, profuse, and sometimes profane, it deserves a separate, special mention.
West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:45pmRational, You just babble on and on and on and on and on… We are Patriots that want to get back to Constitutional principles, you are a Progressive that wants socialism for the entire world. There is a big difference between us and I believe the Progressive disease is what will cause our country to fall. I do think however that you will be happy to see the complete destruction of our Constitution. Just my observation of all who continue to stay insane. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results, Albert Einstein. This is what Progressives do.
Report Post »My Faith
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:52pmRational is the biggest hypocrite I’ve ever seen.
Hey rational LOSER what is it you are doing saying Ron Paul supporters have a disease? Or the names you call, Paulbot? So what disease do you have, the I suck Obamas rear disease? Wacko!
You are an absolute hypocrite. You just want to start trouble and do the very things you complain about. That’s how stupid you really are! Now go put your lips back on your daddy Obamas rear. Wack job!
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:58pm>CONSERVATARIAN. Lol. You mean ALL this time I thought it was “Lew” Rockwell and it’s actually “Lou” Rockwell? Shiite man… I’m losin it! Lol.
I don‘t think I’ve ever called Ron Paul a “complete” Liberal (just like I wouldn’t call him a complete idiot) except maybe out of expediency. Lol. That’s an easy mistake to make though when damn near 3/4 of his platform is Leftist Liberal in nature… Democrat Party drivel.
Now Conservaliberalatarain, if you‘re tryin’ to insult me… WELL YOU’VE SUCEEDED! I‘ve got these GIGANTIC crocodile tears justa’ drippin‘ all over my puter AND YOU’RE TO BLAME! Lmao!
You can paint me as whatever you want to, but don’t paint me late to a Ron Paul and his supporters bashing… because it’s in my Conservative DNA and nature to bash Liberals. Ooops, sorry, Thrifty-Liberals. Or do you prefer quasi- (small c) conservatives, lol.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:07pmWe can toss Gingrich’s flip flopping on waterboarding. His support of the Patriot Act, the most police state regulatory law ever dumped on the American people. His belief that children should be taken away from mothers, after stripping mothers of any and all benefits even if they are trying to work and balance child rearing and getting a hand UP while they transition. The children would be shipped off to fictional Boys Towns he foresees being built by the same tax dollars he’s taking from the mothers. He has changed his position so often (for political gain….tyranny) on climate change that his indescribable from a picture of Nancy Pelosi. He believes in expansionist Nation building and believes that America should have applied OUR (not mine for certain) will on deposing Egypts ruler and the Libyan ruler. I would imagine that would also now include the Syrian leader and the Iranian leader.
Those Nations are none of our damned business outside a working business relationship. Who the hell are we to decide another sovereign Nations internal governance? We aren’t, or at least we shouldn’t be, the Nations police force.
He supports the umbrella protection of Europe which began as, and continues forward as a progressive (code name for communist if people would learn history) agenda, in line with UN agenda 21. As a member of the Scottish Order he approves of the agenda 21 as how it removes the sovereignty of the US border with Mexico.
Report Post »My Faith
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:12pmYEPPIE
Is an old broken down has been progressive.
All YEPPIE wants is to cause trouble. That’s what progressives do.
Yeppie voted for Obama last election and will do so again this election. Yeppie is just trying to cause trouble with conservatives because Yeppie is Progressive.
Yeppie loves Obama!
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:14pm> FAITH.
“YepImALoser-You are just an old has been who is progressive. You believe Government should dictate every citizens way of life. Progressive idiot! You also said you voted for Obama. Loser!”
————————————————————————————————
And that would be opposed to what? Young, inexperienced and liberally educated by today’s schools, colleges and universities getting all my social interaction from the internet, Ron Paul quasi-conservative websites, and venturing out only to get a bag of weed and back? Is THAT what you’re saying kiddie? Lol.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:15pmYep, everyone with half a brain knows you are a Progressive posting idiotic commenting on a site that was started from a man who hates and warned us all about your kind. You will never have an effect on any true Conservative Patriot here. I have been quite amazed at the numbers of Progressives on here but I should not have been. What better place for Progressives to go and try to create havoc with true Americans than a site that was started by Glenn Beck. It is, however, quite entertaining to listen to your dribble and point out to true Americans the idiocy of your kind. Thanks for the laughs you give me everytime I read your posts.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:17pm@West Coast Patriot
Thank you so much for volunteering to be our example test specimen.
Report Post »Forgive me for not being thorough enough to take an accurate count of how many Paulitis disease symptoms you exhibited in your last post. But it was an excellent example with mutiple symptoms. Especially the example of sociopathic behavior……EXCELLENT!
Because of your dedication as a test specimen, normal people will be better equipped to recognize and prepare for Paulitis and Paulistinians in the future.
Carry on!…………………………
West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:22pmFaith, don’t let Yepimacommunist get to you as he really is a Communist plant on here. There are many Communist plants on the Blaze because it is Glenns news site and they are extremely afraid of it. Their hopes are to cause havoc and disparity between true Americans. Just stick with Constitutional principles and we will be OK.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:26pmRationalcommunist, this one’s for you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0&feature=youtu.be
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:28pmYep and Rational Communists, You make me laugh, Hahahahaha. You guy’s are so funny thinking that you are getting away with fooling people about your Communist beliefs. I bet your families are so proud.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:41pm@ A Conservatarian
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:56pm
It’s all bueno 10th, I get exasperated with all the ridiculous comments we have to knock out of the park, but if we don‘t then we wouldn’t have the opportunity to show off the little wolves in sheep’s clothing prancing around the Republican Party. Heeeeeere little neo-con neo-con ;)
———————————————————————————————————————————————
The hour in the race is late. At some point the agenda’s have to start making sense as a sound policy. If the candidates can’t craft a coherent and consistent message by this time, they are not going to.
It was about 2 months ago on here that I thought Gingrich would at least make a good VP. That was until I started digging into what this guy represents. Besides that little bit I posted above in this thread, there are literally pages and pages of his position flips to try to align with any voting block. He doesn’t have a message other than a progressive message. I agree with Joe McCarthy’s stand. Call progressives what they, Marxists. That socialist platform has different degree’s. Gingrich’s expansionist nation building is tyranny, and anti Republic Constitutional. It makes him a communist.
Report Post »My Faith
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:48pm@YEPPIE
Are you that stupid to think your old broken down self was not progressed?
The progression didn’t just happen idiot. Your old broken generation is what gave us the crap mess today. You taught this generation to have their hands out. It didn’t just start.FDR. Woodrow Wilson. That’s your progressive founders and when it started.
Are you that dumb?
As for Ron Paul, he stands opposite of your progressive agenda. You discourage those standing by the Constitution. That shows who the progressive is, YOU.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:54pm>Ahhhh, it‘s the WESTCOASTLIBERAL again bringing one’s family into the fray…
“… bet your family is proud.”
If I told you once, I’ve told you now four times (yep, four times) that one’s family is sacrosanct when discussing, babbling, ranting, arguing, pontificating, holding court, debating and not to be brought up as a tool to disparage, insult and get the upper hand in a war of words with me, myself and I.
Sorry… forgot… you’re a Ron Paul supporter. You haven’t got much ammunition. My bad.
Carry on punk, lol.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:05pmYepimacommie, I knew if I said the word family, you would show how ignorant you really are. I was not cutting down your family, I was cutting you down, but a Commie would take that as an insult to his family. I did not direct anything toward your family members, but just toward you in a sarcastic way. You are a pathetic human being that does not know anything about true Liberty. You are probably on the gov dole and just are unhappy with yourself. As far as your family, it amazes me that it hits such a chord with you. It makes me wonder if you have remorse about something with your family, but again this satement is not directed at any of your family members, but you personally.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:07pm@ yep
Sorry… forgot… you’re a Ron Paul supporter. You haven’t got much ammunition. My bad.
————————————————————————————————————————————————-
I wasn’t a Ron Paul supporter until I actually researched both Romney and Gingrich. It‘s pretty bad when even Bill the socialist Clinton endorses Gingrich’s policies.
I was like you not that many years ago. Buy the cheap drivel put out by candidates and not bother checking for accuracy. Once I really started digging into Ron Paul and laid his record down next to ALL the candidates in the field, Paul is the ONLY conservative in the race except perhaps Bachmann. Even Perry is better than Gingrich and Romney.
Report Post »My Faith
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:11pmAnd Yeppie, your wife says hi!
You are a communist though so you value your dog more then your wife. Loser!
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:14pmImaANeocon – nope didn’t insult you, the only person I’ve tried to insult with very little effort today was that baby you saw me post to early early this morning. If I pull out the Your Momma joke you can bet I’m talkin with a halfwit … or someone fitting that line “someone so uptight if you stuck a lump of coal up their ass, in a two weeks you’d have a diamond.” And, no you had it right, it’s Lew not Lou. And I’ll take 1/4 conservative from you since your candidate is 4/4′s neocon, so this is a good trade, unless it‘s Bachman and she’s making her way to 1/2 status and Huntsman is around 3/4+. Honestly, study difference between Keynes and the Austrian bunch. If I pulled you away from that sick group of economists into the light of the Austrian’s, that’s a hell of a lot more of victory than you saying e.g. that Ron Paul was suddenly 1/2 conservative. Romney, Santorum, Gingrich (not so much Perry anymore since he‘s seeing some light at the end of his tunnel but I can’t trust someone who used to run Al Gore’s campaign) anyhow, all those candidates, tried and true Keynesians – a large part of what makes a Neo-Con a Neo-Con; the other half being nation building/medling.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:20pmFor those who may be wondering how Paul supporters came to be known as Paulistinians, lets take a look at the decision making process that brought us to conclude that the name ”Paulistinian” should be the official name for those radicals that follow Yoda and aspire to be part of the cult.
First, is the obvious play on words. Paul and ‘Pal’-istian. We simply added a ‘u’.
Second, is the also obvious, and yet more subtle history of these two distinct groups. Just as Newt has stated about the Palistinians, they are a “made up people”. The Arabs refuse to embrace them for any other purpose than political purposes and propganda against Israel.
We could easily substitute Arabs with the word Democrats in refering to Paul supporters. Democrats, blue-dog or otherwise, only use Paulistinians to their political advantage. Whether it’s for drug legalization or just to make Ron Paul the “spoiler” that he is by voting for him and thereby insuring Obama gets re-elected.
Then too, Israel tollerates the Palistinians and tries to make peace with them, but they keep bombing Israel, lying about them, stalling the peace process and trying to destroy them.
Here again, we can substitute Israel with Republicans and Palistinians for Paulistinians. The Libertarian bunch that follow Yoda are not Republicans but are trying to ride on their coattails all the while calling them communists and other slanders that make them undesirable to the Republicans.
continued………….
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:23pm@ YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:54pm
Sorry… forgot… you’re a Ron Paul supporter. You haven’t got much ammunition. My bad.
Carry on punk, lol.
———————————————————————————————————————–
SO, calling people names is only okay when you’re the one doing it? But when someone calls YOUR candidate a communist you rush to defend the indefensible!
Ask Newt how many more billions he wants to “spread” to protect Eurotrash. Then ask him how many more billions in America taxpayers money he wants to “invest” in his Nation building schemes to perpetuate conquest. By the time he gets through with just those two itty bitty liabilities (code name for stealing money from Americans to shower on foreigners), most Americans who work (the 53%) will take home less than 30% of the wage we’ve earned. All that is before stealing our hard earned dollars for national healthcare. Here’s a hint. Teddy Roosevelts NEW “Nationalism” is nothing but Marxism pandered to the public with a pretty pink bow. THAT’S what Gingrichs platform is.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:29pmcontinuing…………….
It’s the same as with the Palistinians that have no country. The Paulistinians have no political party for Yoda to run for president in. They are interlopers the same as the Palistinians are in land that belongs to Israel. It could also be mentioned that both groups use violent retoric and threaten violence againct anyone who opposes them. Like police and other figures of authority.
Therefore, with these similarities and more, Paulistinian has become the official name for those that suffer from Paulitis disease.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:29pm@ Rational Man
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:20pm
For those who may be wondering how Paul supporters came to be known as Paulistinians, lets take a look at the decision making process that brought us to conclude that the name ”Paulistinian” should be the official name for those radicals that follow Yoda and aspire to be part of the cult.
—————————————————————————————————————————————-
I would prefer following in “Yoda’s Cult” (Ron Paul), than follow Darth Sidious’ Cult (Newt Romney).
Unlike you, most of us came to the conclusion that we prefer the Representative Elected Republic over the servile tyranny of socialism in all it’s hideous forms.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:32pmRational, That is what I like about you and Yep, you are both good for a laugh. You two missed your calling. You should both be at home with Commi Marxist comedians like Janeane Garofalo. Keep up the comedy relief for us true Americans here on The Blaze.
Report Post »Veritas Libertas
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:09pm@Rational, since you’ve been readily handed your ass, a few questions if you care to answer? Are you paid per site you inhabit, are you paid a set rate or per s/n as a multi-troller, or a set rate as general contractor? Also, is your “activity” funded by the DNC or the progressive stream of the RNC? I ask because your only purpose here seems to be bashing congressman Paul and not espousing another candidate’s virtues.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:23pm>10th. I don’t write infomercials for my candidate of choice Gingrich, but the like I’ve said many times… I’ll vote for the eventual nominee even Paul. I don‘t come running to anyone’s defense especially a politician. They’re adults and can defend themselves and their policies good or bad. You must have me confused with a Paul supporter. You don’t see me posting endless diatribe commercials and spin about Gingrich ar anyone else (well except for the occasional jab at Paul) Lmao. Okay, I’m guilty… more than just occasional regarding Paul and his cultish acolytes. Okay, I’m really guilty, I’ll admit it… I love to dog you Paul folks. Ha! You’re so easy! I especially like it when you leave the reservation and head off into Liberal Tourettes land… it gives me a Conservative thrill up my leg!!
And yes… insults? I give what I get from the punks who invented it… Liberals and Ron Paul Thrifty-Liberals. But mine are TAME compared to what I get eh?? Lol.
Report Post »rush_is_right
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:43pm“Look at how stupid Rush_is_right, YepImALoser, and Irrational are. They come on a thread about Newt but only post Negatives about Ron Paul. Seems you 3 are obsessed with Ron Paul”
hey gomer, I didn’t mention ron paul…but his followers sure are dumb as a box of rocks…its hard to tell them from the brain-dead democrats…so which are you? not that it matters, you obviously can’t think for yourself….what a loser.
I do feel sorry for you, such stupidity has to hurt….
Report Post »rush_is_right
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:48pm“Rush_is_Right-You don’t know your head from your rear. Shut up your dumb. Now sign into your other name. ”
what other name? what about your other name there henry….nobody can be THAT stupid, its rather obvious…what a loser…
Report Post »My Faith
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:58pmYepImaProgressive
So basically you just said you are the problem. You don’t support your candidate but run around downing and antagonizing Ron Paul supporters calling them names and insulting them the very way you say they do. You are the problem America is the way she is.
You are the reason America is progressed into almost communism. You now say it’s them youngsters fault but reality says they are just acting how YOUR generation taught them.
Your generation gave us war after war and a world government. Your generation brought us woodstock, fiat money, backing dictators, drugs, sex with everything, government dependence, and worthlessness. Your generations are cowards like you. You can’t even admit your mistakes.
Yeppie the loser is a communist and a trouble maker. Yep and those like him are the ones that should be tarred and feather. Yep is voting for Obama or Newt as they are the same.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:18pm@ My Faith
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:58pm
—————————————————————-
Yepi is changing tactics. He’s rushing to the defense of McCain, another full blown Progressive (marxist) who turned his back on principle for the sake of money and power.
He thinks because McCain was a POW in VietNam that makes it okay for him to crap on the Constitution, steal from the People who “wanted” to believe in his Patriotism, and finally to jump into bed with the progressive/marxists.
A traitor is a traitor regardless of his past.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:19pm> CONSERVN’. All I can say to that circular firing squad of a comment of your’s is… I’m sure glad I voted for that Keynesian Ronald Reagan. And stuck by the guy through his whole term… unlike Paul of course.
I knew what Rockwell’s first name was, but played along knowing that if he’s all you say he is and a bag of chips… you should at least be able to spell it. But that‘s small ’taters compared to what he and Rothbard espouse and espoused. If asked, I’m a Hayek and Friedman guy in most repects, that comes with age and experience on my part… but I digress. Rothbard was nothing more than an extremist anti-war zealot and anarchist. You go ahead and toe your Libertarian party line and it‘s heroes and I’ll go for what I know.
Report Post »My Faith
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:22pmRush_is_right
hey gomer, you make no sense, progressives are democrats and republicans idiot! That’s y you are just like Obama. Thats y u put others before your own country! War, spending, and government is what ur about just like Obama. you are the ones in the bible that takes the mark cause your heads so far up your one world government rear and think it’s ok! your to arrogant to see your opposite of god and the reason America is in the mess it’s in. I dont feel sorry for you cause your the spawn of Satan and deserve the punishment you get.go worship ur moon god loser wacko!
Good try but I’m not henry.guess more then me and ur wife see the idiot you are.loser
Report Post »rush_is_right
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:30pm“hey gomer, you make no sense, progressives are democrats and republicans idiot! ”
hey gomer, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery!!! what a loser…who’s you daddy??? hmmm??? BWHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHA
“That’s y you are just like Obama.”
thats y you’re an idiot.
“you are the ones in the bible ”
and you’re like balaam…go look it up loser….
“Good try but I’m not henry.guess more then me and ur wife see the idiot you are.loser
”
hey loser, its THAN, not then….more pathetic stupidty….you know its bad when your own mother thinks you’re a moron…wow I can see why you can’t get a girl….how does it feel to be SO pwned??? hmmmmm??
rush_is_right
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:38pm“I dont feel sorry for you cause your the spawn of Satan ”
oh uh gomer, its YOU’RE…not your…BWHAHHAHAHAHA more pathetic laughable stupidity…
I do feel sorry for you, such stupidity has to hurt…and you must be in SEVERE PAIN…wow
again, how does it feel to be SO pwned?? hmmm?? and how does it feel to know how far out of your league I am???? hmmmm??? LOL
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:40pm> FAITH. You’re reaching, but you’re not quite there. You’re ever so close to the brass ring. Just a little further… S-T-R-E-T-C-H… 2, 3, 4.
>10TH. So, I‘m to assume your Father was a POW and can attest to John McCain’s cowardice? I won‘t disparage your Father’s service if he was in fact a Vietnam Vet, but if he was… ask him what a REMF is? That’s my new description for you 10TH… a REMF. I won’t ask what he (your Father) did while he was in Vietnam, but I‘m guessing with talk like that about McCain’s service record he was….
Nah…. nevermind REMF… you couldn‘t even come close to understanding and I won’t go there with another Vet (if you’re being honest that is). Lol.
Report Post »rush_is_right
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:47pm@mi bi faith..
I really have beaten you down haven’t I now? your desperation is palpable…I’ve reduced you to babbling idiocy…not that its very hard…..loser….BWAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHA
Report Post »My Faith
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 8:16pmThanks Rush is right rational man and YepImaLoser I was able to show what ur purpose is in posting. You only post to cause problems and start trouble.losers! ur trolls that no body should pay attention to at all!
Report Post »Ur whole intent is to cause turmoil like union thugs and paid protesters! Hahahahaha exposing losers like u is easy!
The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:55pmNo my dad wasn’t a POW, but he does have a couple of medals from that waste of American lives conflict. 1 of them is the Purple heart when his unit was engaged during the TET offensive. He was with the 3rd Marines, 3rd Battalion that lost almost 30 fighting men. He was wounded with Mike Company that took on the 325th North Vietnamese and stopped that Regiment cold in its tracks. he saw 2 of his best friends killed in that fight.
What’s your point? That somehow being a POW makes honor and integrity optional once they’re free?
I have a brother serving in the Army completing his second tour of Afghanistan, after having served under Schwarzkopf during Desert Storm. He believes that McCain is a man who lost his morals and allegiance to the United States. Supporting and Defending the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic, means for life. McCain used his Military service to become a lying thief and traitor to the Constitution.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:14pm@ yepyou’reacommie
Asked my dad what REMF meant. He says anytime you’d like to put your service record next to his, have at it. He volunteered because he believed it was the right thing to do and his wounds cost him a Professional career in the NFL. He’s never regretted his service a day since he joined.
I take it that you had to be drafted.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 6:29am> 10TH (Er sorry, REMF). Lol, okay, okay…. you win. I can’t fight a 3rd party family war story fed to me by a REMF who has to use that 3rd party to make a point… if you’re being completely honest that is. Notice, I keep stating… “if you’re completely honest”, ‘cuz your story could just be a figment of your imagination.. a leeetle dookie-doo maybe… eh? Who knows… you said it, you own it.
All you’ve shown me here is that you are Chairborne Deranger REMF.
Report Post »KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 8:25amYou might as well give the election to Obama if you put Romney or Gettinrich on the ticket.
The are just going to continue the status quo and spend us into oblivion. Ron Paul is the only one that will fight for our freedom, liberty and fiscal sanity. If Americans want that restored then they will support him with all they got to get out and vote for him in the primaries. I know I will vote for Dr. Paul and refuse to compromise my vote to choose who the Democrats and the corrupt media have chosen for me.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:33amNopeI’mANeocon is attacking 10th Amendment because 10th Amendment had the audacity to diverge from toeing the neocon line of reasoning in regards to Newty GinGrinch.
I agree,10th. No more reasoning with idiots. No more chilling out. It’s time to wild out and maybe crack some heads…definitely time to step on some [expletive deleted] toes.
Only commies believe in Global Warming after it has already been proven a lie, and they’ve been caught lying in emails.
Newt is a Commie. A commie with a delusion of grandeur. Why didn’t he just kiss Nasty Policy in her Botox-ridden mouth in that Global Warming commercial?
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 11:43amYepImStillaNeoCon-
LOL! circular firing squad comment… cute! At least you’re on board with Hayek, that’s a good start. You already know why Ron Paul wrote Reagan the letter telling him why he was parting with his fiscal policy. I agree with Ron Paul on that one and I also know why Reagan was playing the big money game; we had to beat the soviets, Reagan did; do I think it was necessary to spend all that money? Nope. But, he did. Paul having the cojones to stand up for his beliefs, no one an take away from his consistency or moral compass. Far as Rothbard, I’m not concerned with his social philosophy, just like I‘m not interested in the seriously liberal philosophy of Albert Einstein’s. But, do I study Relativity? Yep, it‘s a mind bender just as Rothbard’s ideas on fiscal policy are revolutionary. If I subscribed to your line of thinking about every person – judging them in such a fashion, I probably wouldn’t want to study anyone, or most anyone. Our founding fathers were all by definition, racist and bigots and here we all are touting their successes. Nice try boobey, glad to see you getting a bit more civil though.
Report Post »Landfill
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:29pmNever apologize for telling the truth. That so many inside Washington DC hate Newt Gingrich is a strong recommendation to regular Americans they should vote for him. We have become so accepting of cowardice in leadership, we forget fearless political opinions were at the heart of our founding as a nation. Those fearless opinions were paramount in the founding of this republic and are the centerpiece of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:33pmGingrich could offer me 50 million dollars and his communist ass couldn’t buy my vote. He’s just like John McCain, a TRAITOR to America, and the US Constitution.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:39pm> 10th. You have McCain confused with John Kerry IT guy. I‘m sure you wouldn’t make a good pimple on McCains arse… but don’t let that stop you from trying eh? Lol.
I‘m sure you and John Kerry would get along just fine though from what I’ve seen you write on The Blaze.
Report Post »TTEXASTYLER
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:50pmGreat post. I agree–conservatives should never apologize for telling the truth; however, Newt has a history of NOT telling the truth. The hypocrisy of going after Clinton’s infidelities in the White House when he was doing the exact same thing is beyond reprehensible. Newt should have recused himself if he had an honest bone in his body. But, then again, character doesn‘t matter as long as we agree with the politician’s policies, right? The problem is I agree with most of what Newt says, but not a whole lot of what he DOES. Past behavior predicts future behavior.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:56pm@ Yepyou’reaneocon
I vote the Constitution, not a ****** who happens to have an R or a D after their name. Voting habits matter. Actions matter, lies and deceit matter, principle matters, and CHARACTER is paramount.
McCain is worse than even John Ferry, because he’s an active deceiver, and liar. It’s expected for dunce level morons like Kerry to be anti Constitution, much like you.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:31pm> 10th. Fire, fire… teeth on fire! I‘m sitting here lmao at your IT type guy false bravado machinations regarding what you would do with your genitalia and John McCain’s mouth and teeth. Have you ever served a day in the Military 10th? I remember you wrote you did some IT work for the Military and talked big dogs about your education and name dropped a little bit… but LORD MAN… GET A GRIP!!
No, that‘s not what I mean’t… put THAT down and grab your socks trainee! Lol.
Report Post »Tagudinian
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:40pmWhat is the current approval rating of Congress? About 13% – 14%? All these savage attacks, revelations of egregious and nefarious behavior, vitriol, outrage and rabid anger being leveled at Newt Gingrich coming from Senators, and members of Congress don’t amount to a hill of beans. These people are trying to make their voices heard and their commentary count toward the destruction of the Newt Gingrich campaign. The question is WHY? Because Newt is his own man. He is not part of the Washington DC herd. Newt is not part of the constable of Washington DC ravens. He is not part of the gaggle of Washington DC geese. Clearly Princess Nancy is afraid of Newt. Wonder why? Obama’s big bloated intestines should be shaking right now.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:59pmYou sound jealous yepi.
It‘s okay that you’re not very bright and willing to be a sell out, but don‘t expect others to believe the lie that you’re a conservative. A neocon, yeah which is what politicians like Graham, Brown, McCain, Gingrich, Romney and Obama are.
It’s okay if you want to support socialists, that’s your prerogative, but don‘t be surprised when some people are sick of the willingness to compromise America’s way of life, and call it the way they see it. If you don’t like what I have to say, simply don’t read what I have to say. I was once like you, running thru life with fingers in my ears shouting I can’t hear you.
Report Post »SekndAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:01pmI’d vote for Newt for $50M haha. My state only has two electoral college votes so when I cast a ballot it’s only for peace of mind knowing I did the right thing.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:26pm> 10TH. Actually not jealous at all. Now tell me again your IT heroics and your Military connection? Did it have something to do with that Drone that went down in Iran? I can’t quite remember the specifics. Lol.
Look dude, calling McCain a “TRAITOR” to America is a new low for you. Hell, I wouldn’t call Ron Paul a “TRAITOR” to America… and you know how much I can’t stand THAT guy and his idiotic musings and politics.
I would never, ever think of disparaging Ron Paul’s Military record regardless of what I think of him. Kerry? Well THAT’s another story.
I’m thinking the jealousy is on your part somehow son, but not with me. I think people in the Military in general (if you even work with them in any capacity) aren‘t your cup o’ joe.
Report Post »My Faith
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:04pmIf it isn’t YEPPIE the loser who likes little boys.
Yeppie why don‘t you go kiss Obama’s rear since you like his policies so much. Oh wait your lips are already planted on sellout freak John loser McCain. John McCain is a traitor and so are you idiot.
You are a stupid loser who just likes to cause trouble. Loser wacko !
Report Post »rush_is_right
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:22pm@my faith..
sounds like your faith is in satan…I bet he’s very proud of you!
you’re just another uneducated easily led democrat….incapable of thinking for yourself…even your insults are lame…what a buffoon!!
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:27pm> FAITH. Another typical Paul supporter. Let’s break this down…
__________________________________________________
“If it isn’t YEPPIE the loser who likes little boys.
Yeppie why don‘t you go kiss Obama’s rear since you like his policies so much. Oh wait your lips are already planted on sellout freak John loser McCain. John McCain is a traitor and so are you idiot.
You are a stupid loser who just likes to cause trouble. Loser wacko !”
________________________________________
Naw, I’ll just let it speak for itself, lmao!
Report Post »My Faith
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:34pm@Rush_is_right
That’s not what your wife says.. Loser!
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:32pmOne thing I’ve learned. Progressives hate being called what they really are, members of the communist party, platforming a socialist agenda.
You should make the effort to learn what you stand for yepyou’reaneocon.
I‘m sorry that you’re not proud of what you do for a living, or your education background. Though you act like the typical Campus yippie, and undoubtedly support all these kooks in this occupy crap.
Most on here would know that my first 3 candidates were 1. Cain 2. Bachmann 3. Perry As the field has imploded starting with Cain. I donated money to his campaign, but after so many allegations he’s just not a viable candidate. True or false the doubts buried Cain, and that includes with me. Bachmann had dropped off the map because she didn’t have the conviction and certainty that it takes to lead. Interestingly she has become more assertive, and her policy record and votes are a matter of public record. As are Gingrich’s. To me Michelle fell off the map, and has begun to reemerge. I didn’t have Ron Paul anywhere on my radar until I actually researched his voting record (which I’ve posted in the past). I had him right there at the bottom with Tim Paulenty.
That has changed, because of simple research of policy positions for Gingrich and Romney. Both of their platforms are progressive, and progressivism is Marxism. But you being a neocon will already know that.
Chase a different boogieman. I’m not PC.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:58pm>10TH. Yes, I did see you put a couple of times that you were a Cain supporter and had some good words for Bachmann and Perry, but I could see right through your Horse Shiite a mile away when you mentioned Ron Paul like you had some sort of epiphany. Lmao. Give me a break. But hey, I’ll let you tell the story okay. I’m not a mind reader, but I can read between the lines. And I read between the lines every time I cared to read a comment of your’s and your stances on various topics. You can kid a kidder but you can’t con a well rounded Conservative 10th. Calling me a Neo-Con was your first tell awhile back.
As far as my background, I have no need to drop trou with you. Based on what you wrote a month or so ago to me, I am not nearly as impressed with you as you might think. You failed to read between the lines when we first made contact a couple months ago my Catholic transubstantiation defining brother, lol. And brush up on your understanding of humor and sarcasm.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:00pmYepimacommunist, still giving us that comedy relief. Say hi to your family for me. Ha.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:05pmLet me clarify Romney and Gingrich a little better. Their agenda is Technocracy, which is nothing more than a tyranny of the elite.
1. government by technicians: a social system in which scientists, engineers, and technicians have high social standing and political power
2. philosophy promoting technocracy: a philosophy that advocates the enlistment of a bureaucracy of highly trained engineers, scientists, or technicians to run the government and society
The cute little climate change/global warming scam, wrapped up in the RELIGION of Environmentalism is being pushed by social engineers of every “supposed” bend of either right or left. Lawyers and philosophers, along with “Scientististics” building Utopia for all (sounds pretty Marxist you say? It IS) in their cute little bubble called a Technate.
Report Post »rush_is_right
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:45pm“@Rush_is_right
That’s not what your wife says.. Loser!
”
at least I’m man enough to get a wife, unlike you. you should hear what your mom says about you…LOL….she really wants you to move out of her basement….she’s tired of supporting you, and wants you to get a job…but she knows you can never be a real man.
Report Post »My Faith
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:07pmrush_is_right
I live with your mom not mine idiot. That’s were I see and help your wife out. That is my JOB and I love it. So does she.
If you were a real man your wife wouldn‘t be visiting your moms so much idiot to ’visit’ me!
Loser wacko!
Report Post »rush_is_right
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:12pm“That’s were I see and help your wife out.”
hey loser, its WHERE….duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
yeah I can see why you can’t get a girl, and your mom is SO sick of you…wow pathetic stupidity!! BWHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHA
looks like the truth hurts doesn’t it son??? who’s your daddy?? LOL
rush_is_right
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:15pmoh yeah @my bi faith…
you’re too stupid to realize how far out of your league I am…how does it feel to be pwnd???
oh but then you’re used to it….
rush_is_right
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:42pmhow old are you? you’ll never have a wife, or a girl..you couldn’t pay one enough…
what a pathetic little child you are.
your desperation is palpable…
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 9:45pmRush_is_right, Well your name says it all because from my experience, Rush has never been right as he is a Croni, Neocon. Says a lot about you.
Report Post »KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 8:30amThe fact that the corrupt media is giving him so much airtime leads me to believe otherwise. The other day I saw an internet poll that asked you to vote for who won the iowa debate. There were only 3 people you could choose from. Gettinrich, Romney the Rino, and Bachmann. The fact that the corrupt media blacks out Dr. Ron Paul lets me know they are afraid. The majority of media is all corrupt and owned by big leftist entities or establishment parties, they would never give airplay to a real candidate. That is why every conservative should vote for Dr. Paul in the primaries.
Report Post »Forced_Union_Worker
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:28pmI don’t care who is the most conservative candidate, all of them are more conservative then President Obama.
I don‘t care who cheated on their wife and who didn’t, President Obama is a good family man …. and he’s still the worst president we ever had.
I don’t care who has the best foreign policy. President Obama’s foreign policy is a nightmare. All of our candidates would be better than the President.
I don’t care what Glenn Beck says about the candidates. He’s wrong. Glenn is trying to pick the most moral person. President Carter is a very moral man, he was also a terrible President.
I don’t care who wins the nomination, I will vote for who ever wins the nomination. All of them would be a better President than President Obama.
Report Post »Roaran
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:43pmYou’re fooling yourself. If ALL of them can beat Obama, why not support the most conservative candidate?
If you can get your cake and eat it too, why wouldn’t you eat it?
Ron Paul is the most intelligent and conservative candidate. I think with the current candidates, the best we can get is:
President Paul and V.P. Bachman. Mitt Romney and Gingrich are progressive RINOs, and Santorum is completely fooling himself on Iraq and Afghanistan.
I did like Perry mentioning he finally is researching the Fed and his favorite Founder being Madison, but there’s absolutely no reason for me to support Perry when I could support Paul.
Report Post »libh8er
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:54pmGreat post …. Forced union member… I agree with you totally.
Gingrich 2012.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:14pmGlenn Beck said: IS IT ABOUT RACE?
Because that’s the only difference in Gingrich and Obama!
“If you have a big government progressive, or a big government progressive in Obama… ask yourself this, Tea Party: is it about Obama’s race? Because that’s what it appears to be to me. If you’re against him but you’re for this guy, it must be about race. I mean, what else is it? It’s the policies that matter,” Glenn Beck said on FOX Business.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:00pmForced, quit fooling yourself that a Progressive Republican would be better than Obama. It just is not true. Maybe we say it wrong when we say Paul is our country’s only hope. We should be saying the return to Constitutional principles is our country’s only hope and Ron Paul is the only one that takes his oath to protect and defend the Constitution seriously. All the rest have plans to somehow circumvent the Constitution and rule of law. I am tired of big government chopping our liberties off at the knees. I cannot figure you people out on how you continually listen to the establishment on who should be POTUS. I for one, will not allow brainwashing to happen to me anymore.
Report Post »singleparent
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:21pm@momrules well i support the constitution… and i know what a progressive/socialist is do you? most on here hate obama so much they will vote for anyone but him….except ron paul and yes 2 days ago i made up my mind on paul is he perfect no but niether am i but he is for the constitition….all the others are not as much as he is… if you really love this country drop the GOP B.S. and vote with your heart and love for this country.. newt/mitt/obama = progressive/socialist……
Report Post »momrules
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:15pmThank you for telling me who to vote for, thank you questioning my love for this country and my patriotism. Thank you for sounding like the average Obama supporter.
I can and will think for myself.
I have never disliked Dr. Paul and I have never disparaged Dr Paul. I have, on the other hand, disagreed with some of his ideas. That doesn’t sit well with his supporters it seems.
I have been completely turned against voting or Ron Paul by the people who want me and everyone else to support him………. or else. You Ron Paul supporters are the most rabid, vitriolic people in the country with the exception of Obama supporters.
You have turned this man into your own god and you demand that we all worship at the Paul alter. I don’t want another man in the White House that is worshipped as the answer to all things America needs. I don’t want another man who inspires such hatred in his supporters.
On this very site I have read Ron Paul supporters call others every name allowed to be posted from bitch, to anti American to unChristian, just to name a few of those names.
I will not worship a the feet of any clay idol.
You don’t know me. You do not know what I read, what various sites I visit or how I come to my conclusions.
I will watch the candidates and I will watch their supporters and I will make up my own mind.
If I am forced to I will vote for Romney or Perry or Bachman but I prefer Newt Gingrich. Most of all I want Barack Obama out of office.
Report Post »aragona
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:26pmMom – you said it perfectly. The rabidity of the Ron Paul supporter is a major turnoff.
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:19pmYes because myself and so many others tell you have to vote Ron Paul or else. They’re all over the blaze look out! Ya I’ve seen two or three posts the last few MONTHS that say something to the effect “Vote Ron Paul if you want to win because we wont vote for anyone else” – I would vote another but I doubt Huntsman is going to get very far. I won’t pick a lesser of two evils though, quit doin that and I wish you all would too, but, notice there’s no OR ELSE threat :)
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:20pmNewt is “delighted with his record” — Oh my gosh! How can voters NOT check his statements?!?!
Are YOU delighted with Newt’s record?
http://www.newtexposed.com/
Report Post »neverending
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:53pmNo!
Report Post »nueces
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:05pmI turned on the debates and made it through about three minutes. Nauseating. What an absurd process. Only the Stupid Party would allow themselves to be debased in such a manner. These are not debates. Debates are between two adversaries. This circus the media have dreamed up to emasculate pubbies needs to be euthanized.
Report Post »Faith1029
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:36pmThe fact Newt stuck to his initial statement regarding Palestine for me was a great moment for him. Huge applause after that statement He is willing to stand up for America and is not timid or PC like the rest of them who seemed scared to death that they might make some waves if they should tell it like it is. Which tells me they would not tell me the truth about other issues. Newt‘s baggage is over and done and doesn’t mean anything to me because I believe him when he says he is a changed man. His timing and ability to defend himself against the onslaught of attacks is amazing. I want my President to be a fighter for the American people and I believe Newt is the one to fight on my behalf.
Report Post »SevenTrumpets42
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:01pmNewt has lots of warts after poor personal decisions thru the years. He appears to have learned some humility with time. I believe he can espouse conservative ideals and win over moderates using the bully pulpit effectively and will give BO a good fight in the ring of ideas.
Report Post »I would like to see West as his VP.
BlackCrow
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:01pmThe last “Palestinian” was born in 1947 before the partition of the British Palestinian mandate into Israel and Jordan. NEWT IS CORRECT! He doesn’t buy off on left wing PC B.S. The one and only candidate with the backbone to tell the TRUTH!
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:16pmPaul supporters would tell you that he (Paul) has backbone and is all about truth, justice and the American way. Most of his supporters must be color blind though… as all I see is yellow. The same color that all our enemies around the world would see. That’s why Russia is pulling for him to be our next President. Russian TV loves them some Ron Paul.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:21pmI don’t care how Palestinians are labeled by Newt. I care more about the REAL NEWT and facts like this:
2012 Presidential Candidates – Gun Owners Of America
http://www.gunowners.org
Ron Paul A+
Report Post »Rick Perry A
Michelle Bachmann A
Rick Santorum B-
Newt Gingrich C
Mitt Romney D-
Vechorik
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:53pm..forgot to add: If Newt can’t defend GUN RIGHTS, what makes you think he’ll stick up for any other parts of the Constitution? Newt blows where the money goes. Facts prove it. His flips are all related to MONEY. Romney may be a progressive flipper too, but at least money isn’t tied to his flips (that anyone can point to, with truthfulness).
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:57pmThe GOA… Lmao! The armed militia movement endorsing Paul? Who‘da’ thunk it… lol.
Report Post »TTEXASTYLER
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:08pm@Vechorik
“I do support the Second Amendment. I would have signed the assault weapon ban that came to his desk. I said I would have supported that and signed a similar bill in our state. It was a bill worked out, by the way, between pro-gun lobby and anti-gun lobby individuals. Both sides of the issue came together and found a way to provide relaxation in licensing requirements and allow more people to–to have guns for their own legal purposes. So we signed that in Massachusetts, and I’d support that at the federal level. It did not pass at the federal level. I do not believe we need new legislation. I do not support any new legislation of an assault weapon ban nature, including that against semiautomatic weapons. We have laws in place that, if they’re implemented & enforced, will provide the protection and the safety of the American people. I do support the right of individuals to bear arms, whether for hunting purposes or for protection purposes or any other reasons. That’s the right that people have.” — 1/24/08 at Boca Raton, FL debate
“No Constitutional protection is more often ignored, distorted, or disdained than the individual right to keep and bear arms. When demagogues promote policies that would disarm law-abiding citizens, it’s the NRA that says no way. The NRA has a better idea: enforce the laws that are on the books. And, let upright citizens defend themselves, their homes, and their freedoms.” — 5/15/09 at Phoenix, AZ debate
A D-? It is
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:22pmTTexas:
Understanding “Assault Weapons” and “Large Capacity Weapons”
A guideline for Massachusetts
Caution: this information is intended as a guide only and should not be construed as legal advice.
Massachusetts law considers “assault weapons” to be part of a larger class of guns known as “large capacity weapons”. There are restrictions on possession, purchase and transportation of these guns and the penalties for using them in a crime are generally more severe. There is also a ban on “large capacity magazines” made after September 13, 1994.
The definition of “assault weapon” is the same as the federal law that went into effect on September 13, 1994. Specific guns are banned by name, and guns with certain combinations of features are banned:
a semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least 2 of–
(i) a folding or telescoping stock;
(ii) a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon ;
(iii) a bayonet mount;
(iv) a flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor; and
(v) a grenade launcher;
a semiautomatic pistol that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least 2 of–
(i) an ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip;
Report Post »(ii) a threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward handgrip,
or silencer;
cont…
West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:24pm(iii) a shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the barrel and that permits
the shooter to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned;
(iv) a manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded; and
(v) a semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm; and
a semiautomatic shotgun that has at least 2 of–”
(i) a folding or telescoping stock;
(ii) a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon;
(iii) a fixed magazine capacity in excess of 5 rounds; and
(iv) an ability to accept a detachable magazine.’“
A “large capacity feeding device” is defined the same as in federal law, or:
“a fixed or detachable magazine, box, drum, feed strip or similar device capable of accepting, or that can be readily converted to accept, more than ten rounds of ammunition or more than five shotgun shells; … The term “large capacity feeding device” shall not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with,.22 caliber ammunition.”
A “large capacity weapon” is basically any firearm, rifle or shotgun that is semi-automatic with a fixed large capacity feeding device or that is capable of accepting any detachable large capacity feeding device; or an “assault weapon.”
Ban on recently-manufactured “assault weapons” and “large capacity magazines.” State law clearly limits possession to pre-1994 items and exempts out only la
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:25pm“No person shall sell, offer for sale, transfer or possess an assault weapon or a large capacity feeding device that was not otherwise lawfully possessed on September 13, 1994. Whoever not being licensed under the provisions of section 122 violates the provisions of this section shall be punished, for a first offense, by a fine of not less than $1,000 nor more than $10,000 or by imprisonment for not less than one year nor more than ten years, or by both such fine and imprisonment, and for a second offense, by a fine of not less than $5,000 nor more than $15,000 or by imprisonment for not less than five years nor more than 15 years, or by both such fine and imprisonment. The provisions of this section shall not apply to: (i) the possession by a law enforcement officer for purposes of law enforcement; or (ii) the possession by an individual who is retired from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving such a weapon or feeding device from such agency upon retirement.”
Transportation of “Large Capacity Weapons:” No person possessing a large capacity rifle or shotgun under a Class A or Class B license issued under section 131 or 131F shall possess the same in a vehicle unless such weapon is unloaded and contained within the locked trunk of such vehicle or in a locked case or other secure container. Whoever violates the provisions of this subsection shall be punished by a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $5,000.
How i
Report Post »rose-ellen
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:31pmThey were arabs prior to the creation of the state of israel. But they were living on that land and had villages ,homes and cities [jerusalem,haaifa,etc]-while the zionist israelis were citizens of europe.What ever name they use to resist occupation[palestinian] does not negate the fact they were the people of that land[while the zionists came from outside that land]-the zionists were european interlopers.hence they-the arabs- native to what is now israel and who now in juxtaposition [after being ethnically cleansed and occupied call themselves palestinians-as oppossed to syrian say- because they are native to what is now israel-not syria say though prior to being ethnically cleansed by european zionists there was no need to call themselves palestinians since as arabs they were free to live in that land and come and go freely in that land] have the right to be there-and would accept israel IF they could either return to israel peoper[which israel opposes simply because they want a majority jewish inhabited israel which is shear racism]or second best if israel would return to it’s original pre 67war [1948approximate] borders. It is that simple and that true that all arabs[now in resistence calling themselves palestinians]have said so .Including hamas though they would always believe that the creation of the zionist israeli state was immoraland illigitimate[back when the UN was a wester colonialists club].
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:03pmPalestinians are nothing more than left over Roman slaves who worked the land for both the Roman taskmasters, and the Ruling Jews.
When Rome left, they simply squatted on the land because they were too lazy to find their way back to their homelands.
Report Post »ambrosia
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:55amAmerica will soon be getting back to business-
economically, defensively & fiscally.
It’s all about LEADERSHIP, on EVERY level.
Great leaders encourage , community organizers instigate.
Newt will insist on it…..never waiver, never apologize-
never disrespect our Constitution, Declaration or Founding Father’s foresight & fortitude.
It’s uplifting, encouraging & heartwarming-
everything this current administration is not.
Gingrich/West 2012…..America’s dynamic duo !
Report Post »T ParT
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:53amGlenn, I saw the interview with the Judge. Please tell me thats not a knife sticking out of my back with your initials on it. I don’t know how you walk that crap back.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:53amIf you like Newt, then you like the Tofflers. Do you even know who they are?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=moFsABsJNL4#t=23s
Report Post »Psychosis
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:02pmbecause you said so ????
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:22pmbecause Newt and the Tofflers said so! One world government and trashing the Constitution. Do you really want that?
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:34pmIf you like Paul, then you’ll LOVE Lew Rockwell. He‘s somewhat like Cain’s “smoking guy” (kinda’ creepy in appearance and mannerism), except that Rockwell’s a Paul “smoking gun” (proven by fact to be very creepy and the man behind the curtain).
Report Post »martinez012577
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:58pm@yep
You are always worried about looks and sounds coming from men. Are you looking for a president or a date?
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:45pmLMAO MARTINEZ… good one. No, not really, but I give you a GOA armed militia movement rating of A+ just for playing. You know… GOA! The Paul supporting McVeigh-type militia-men.
Report Post »All Pro
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:50amRon Paul owned them last night to the point that they were all agreeing with him. Before the debates started I had 3 options.
Report Post »1. Paul
2. Palin
3. Cain
The media made sure that Palin would be a non factor and so to her credit she decided not to run. When Cain became a factor they took him out. The only non-progressive left in the race is Paul.
If you want 4 more years just like the last 24 then don‘t vote for Paul and you’ll get your wish.
YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:50am“Yeah keep going with the same plan guys. I dont care really. I have food, guns, bullets, water, and supplies. Burn it down.”
I saw that on an OWS sign, lol.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:52amFor MARTINEZ….
Report Post »martinez012577
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:49pmNo, I have the guns and bullets to keep the ows folk off my land. You have proven time after time you are a liberal troll on the blaze forums. Its ok.
We have two choices in this race.
Choice one
Keep running up debt, keep warmongering, keep up the social welfare till everyone is on foodstamps because inflation kills the rest of the free market and no one can afford anything.
End result, total collapse, starvation, murders, rapes, anarchy in the streets of every major city. If you think ows is bad, add guns, and gangs with no police to the mix. Cities will burn and alot of people will die. The recovery will take months to years to restore order.
or
Choice two
Really cut spending, quit warmongering and policing the world, end the handout/you owe me something society our past and current presidents have been using to gain votes. Restore fiscal responsiblity and go back to the Constitution.
End result, We go threw a controlled bankrupcy after we restore our Constitution and fiscal responsiblity. Our borders are protected. We vote in congress for declarations of war with a plan and goals that are carried out with extreme percision and violence. We dont rebuild, we dont aid, we dont do anything not in our best interest.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:10pm“No, I have the guns and bullets to keep the ows folk off my land.”
Why would OWS folks want to get on your land bro? You cultivating something special back thar in ‘dem woods that the OWS folks would like to get their grubby little Libertine hands on? Lol.
I hope you‘re not sellin’ that stuff bro… you know that’s illegal right? Lmao.
I kid you MARTINEZ… like Bill Maher the self-proclaimed Libertarian kids the Conservatives. But you wouldn’t know anything about being a Conservative as you are a Ron Paul Thrifty-Liberal.
Report Post »cassandra
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:47amCome on Tea Party people how can you support Newt he is old Washington,Big government wake up he is just playing the old game tell the people what they want to hear but he will do what he wants if he gets into office, the dept. of Ed will not be touched, cap and trade will go on,lobbiest will stay,congress will stay the same no term limits, he voted for gun control, obamacare will stay,stimulus will go on WAKE UP your drinking more Kool-Aid just a different flavor,
Report Post »nocalifornia
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:56amNice to see the left telling tea party members how to vote, again. Will you do to Newt what you did to Cain? The answer is yes you will try, but the reaction this time will be “no you can’t”.
ABO (Anyone But Obama) 2012
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:24pmGlenn Becks said not to vote for Newt. How can people posting at the Blaze be so blind? Look up WHY Glenn Beck dislikes Newt so much. “Do your own homework” No one is telling you who to vote for — but at least “do your own homework.”
Report Post »Faith1029
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:05pmVECHORIK: “Glenn Becks said not to vote for Newt. How can people posting at the Blaze be so blind? Look up WHY Glenn Beck dislikes Newt so much. “Do your own homework” No one is telling you who to vote for — but at least “do your own homework.”
While I like Glenn Beck, I don’t always agree with him, just like I don’t agree with his denomination. I listen to him but then make my own decisions based on my own convictions. I don’t like when people say Glenn said we should or should not vote for a person. I am perfectly capable of determining who in my opinion would be best for this country. In hanging on his every word and doing what he says is a bit too Cult like for me.
Report Post »aragona
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:38pmJust because Glenn Beck says something, doesn’t mean we agree. See, that‘s the rub isn’t it? You liberal trolls seem to believe that we are a bunch of brainwashed people worshipping at our alter of Glenn Beck, doing exactly what he tells us to do, and then you get angry when you find out it simply isn’t so.
Why are you so threatened that some of us would vote for Newt Gingrich? Do you find him to be threat? Is that not the candidate you invisioned BO running against?
To be clear, I am undecided and will probably remain undecided until the moment I cast my vote but it will by MY vote that I cast. Not Glenn Beck’s vote: not some liberal troll’s vote.
Report Post »martinez012577
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:44amRemember this isnt American Idol. Picking the good looking guy, or the guy with a great voice, or the guy that looks presidential is what has us in the problems we have now.
Good looking presidents
1. 15 trillion in debt. Check
2. 900 bases in 180 countries. Global police. Check
3. Huge Federal Government. Check
4. Two/One party system? There is no difference between either party. Check.
Yeah keep going with the same plan guys. I dont care really. I have food, guns, bullets, water, and supplies. Burn it down.
Report Post »TTEXASTYLER
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:03pm@ Martinez
You wrote, “Picking the good looking guy, or the guy with a great voice, or the guy that looks presidential is what has us in the problems we have now.”
I disagree. MOST american’s DID NOT vote for Obama because “he was a good-looking guy with a great voice who looks presidential”. Most Americans voted for Obama because he promised “change”. We, the American people, knew we did not like what the progressive Bush administration had done and assumed the other party would be the remedy or the “change” we needed. I contend most Americans yearned for the liberty and prosperity which is the inevitable consequence of reducing the size of government and restoring our republic by restoring the Constitution. American’s picked the politician who disguised and neatly packaged his socialist ideology to appeal to a people who wanted a change from the BIG-GOVERNMENT, liberty-suppressing, economy-destroying policies of progressives ( like George Bush), assuming Obama would take America in the opposite direction. The irony was Obama offered the same thing as Bush but accelerated exponentially. I suspect there was a smidgeon of the population (especially among whites) who were excited to vote for a black man to prove their egalitarianism; however, the majority of American’s would have voted for Rodney Dangerfield (rest his soul) over what Bush left us and what McCain essentially represented. Let us educate ourselves and and friends about progressivism and restore
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:37amIf he starts apoligizing, they will Eat him alive……
Report Post »momrules
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:35amI believe Romney was promised the GOP nomination if he would drop out of the race against Obama. I thought it then and I think it now.
What the RNC and the MSM didn’t plan on was the American peoples dislike and distrust of Romney and now they are determined to ruin Newt Gingrich. It won’t work this time around.
Newt is making me believe we have a chance to get a real leader back into the White House. A leader who will put America first but who will be willing to work with all nations that are willing to work with the USA.
As far as his personal problem go, he went to God and asked for forgiveness and shared that information with us. I like person who admits that he went to the right source to ask for forgiveness.
Report Post »singleparent
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:43ambull crap newt is a progressive just like mitt and obama….i did not vote for obama cause i knew who he was… i‘m not vote’ing for a progressive… weather they have a (D) or a (R) infront of there names… the media id picking the canidates not the people…..
Report Post »momrules
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:54amSingleparent………..let me guess, you are a Ron Paul supporter.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:07pm@singleparent
Report Post »There are no progressives in the Republican race. There are some who are more liberal than others. The Paulies need to come to their senses and stop helping 0bama. Even if it were true that everybody who doesn’t happen to be Ron Paul is a progressive, they would have the false and ignorant belief that 0bama is no worse than just another progressive.
Vechorik
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:27pmQPWILLIE, It was Bush I that signed United Nations Agenda 21 (the global government deal). Every president since has pushed toward global government, even Bush II. A classic example is: Why didn’t Obama close the borders? Why didn’t Bush II close the borders?
Study United Nations Agenda 21 and you’ll see how most Democrats and some Republicans support global government, crashing of the dollar, redistribution of wealth world-wide, etc. It will make light bulbs go off for you, promise.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:52pm@Vechorik
Report Post »Once again, you have proved that you know nothing about 0bama and what he’s up to.
West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:13pmQP, I think your the one that does not understand. Progressives will continue to police the world thinking that the best way to spread democracy is through the barrel of a gun and telling the world we know what is best for them. Arrogance. Mitt and Newt fall under a Progressive pattern. Going back to Constitutional principles is the only way to rid our country of Progressive policies built up over the years. We are a nation of laws, but at this point in time, we are lawed to death. Try starting a business today. It used to be so much easier but now regulations make it quite difficult. We need the pendulum to make a big swing the other way. It will be hard, but we can survive this as long as we do not lose all our liberties.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:33amShort of Newt being being kidnapped and held for money bomb ransom by over-zealous Ron Paul supporters… looks like Newt’s the man in Iowa.
Report Post »martinez012577
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:39amShort of you finding a brain and learning to use it, you are and always will be a troll.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:46amSo I’m guessing you had your duct tape AND “hemp rope” ready MARTINEZ and I blew the whistle on that for you? Lmao!!
Time to come up with another wisful thinking plan to make America think Ron Paul is actually winning something besides skewed polls and skewed donation results… lol.
Report Post »I Love Freedom
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:52amHere is what Glenn Beck says about Newt and his progressive positions
http://rpflix.com/3386
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:57amSorry, don’t click on links. beck would Beck vote for? And what did Beck say about Paul supporters… again please… IN LARGE TYPE… so we can all read it… lol.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:58am>FREEDOM. Typist malfunction…. Beck would vote for who?
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:05pm@YEP I type in Peace. No name calling. But why is it that you ONLY ever talk on here about us crazy RON PAUL supporters? I know were a hot topic but its all u talk about? lol
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:35pm> WAKEUP.
Okay, just for you NOT being boocoo dinkey dau I’ll answer.
It’s because I love you all long time. Lol.
Peaceful enough there Di Wee WAKEUP?
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:49pmlol ok man
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:16pmTry clicking on a link and learn something for a change there Yep, Ignorance is not a virtue, or are you ignorant enough to not have protection on your computer?
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:37amThat’s all they can do is attack and attack again, because their first attack ***fails*** and so does their subsequent attacks. So the only way to appear as if they’re making some “progress” (because liberals and neocons are the same, and they’re all progressives) is to constantly attack.
They’re desperate.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 2:52pmYepimacommie, I know you are not smart enough to click on links to actually research, but here is a link that tells you what Beck thinks about Paul in his own words, and what he thinks about the other candidates. If you do not want to click the link, probably because you are not smart enough to have security on your computer, go to Youtube and type in the link yourself. Say hi to your family for me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcAYJqG0NEI
Report Post »espersemper
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:32amIf its about dealing with people that need to beleive in the progressive ideology…Newt could pull it off.
Report Post »After all, the progressives voted in the president , they control the media and have the ennemy salivating. Romney still looks weak next to Newt (who gets that Obama’s self love still portrays leadership to the Obama XXX fan-club).
All that is left to do is give Newt a makeover! Bachman could get a sex change and Santorum a name change (sanctimomious in itself). Poor old Paul… whining voices rarely inspire testosterone
to reproduce …I love Jimmy Stuart too but this is rediculous! Get his son out to translate!
Vechorik
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:06pmBachmann isn’t as conservative as most think:
She co-sponsored pro-Union bill HR 980 (http://www.thefreemanonline.org/colu…-union-bosses/).
In 2005, as a State Senator in Minnesota, she broke her No-Tax Pledge to the Taxpayers’ League of Minnesota by voting YES to a $400 million dollar tobacco tax.
In that same year, she voted to double the ethanol content of Minnesota’s gasoline from 10% to 20%.
Voted YES to the $192 Billion “Anti-Recession Stimulus Bill” in July 2009.
The most ironic aspect of Michelle Bachmann being a “Tea Party favorite” has to be the fact that she prosecuted tax payers on behalf of the IRS
Report Post »NoRoomForSocialismHere
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:24amBachmann has been deliberately pushed out but she made her way back in last night for sure. GOP and Dems are afraid of her and do their best to stifle her. It will not work as the idiots show who they really are.
BACHMANN
Report Post »TEA constitutionalist, Rule of Law
martinez012577
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:34amThe tea party was for no large spending cuts and continued military invasions? I must have missed something.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:11pmBachmann would work for me too if she were to make it to the nomination. I would have absolutely no problem with her. I think she did herself in awhile back though with her “complicated” religious views (to put it kindly).
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:34amBachmann is a perpetrator who is a religious zealot and supportive of the liberty-trampling Patriot Act.
She is disqualified from the Presidency from a Conservative Libertarian’s viewpoint.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:20amI do appreciate Newts calm, unapologetic style–whether you agree or disagree with him, he seems solid on his views. Refreshing.
They all did very well last night, I thought. Diane and Georgie were useless and easily replaceable.
Report Post »martinez012577
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:37amIf by solid you mean Gingrich has decided this month what the voters want and he is sticking to those ideas for now.
Here of a list of Gingrich’s “solid” views.
Report Post »http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?329010-Comprehensive-list-of-Newt-Gingrich-positions
greensteam
Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:41amif john mccain was perfect in every was he still wouldve lost his election because he didnt have a personality that drove supporters to the polls. i still support newt because i think he has the best chance at doing two things:1 driving his supporters to the polls and making it seem important to do so, and 2 making obama look bad enough in a debate to make obama supporters less motivated to vote. i beleive this is what makes elections winnable and losable. i would love to see a rick santorum president, however i dont think he can drive voters to the polls. i think him and bachman would be another john mccain style debater. i think they would struggle to win against a not very popular president. glenn and company believe that the presidents days are numbered so lets get the best guy in there because they cant lose. i respectfully disagree. i think they can lose if they cant inspire enough voters for them and deter enough voters for the president.
Report Post »