Government

AP: Major U.S. Defense Shakeup Coming This Week

WASHINGTON (AP) — Administration sources say President Barack Obama plans this week to name CIA Director Leon Panetta to replace Defense Secretary Robert Gates, and Gen. David Petraeus, now running the war in Afghanistan, would take the CIA chief’s job.

The officials all spoke on condition of anonymity because the changes are not final.

The changes would probably take effect this summer. Gates has already said he will leave this year.

The officials say Obama is expected to also announce that Lt. Gen. John Allen would replace Petraeus as Afghanistan commander, and that diplomat Ryan Crocker will be the next U.S. ambassador in Afghanistan.

The changes are expected to be announced Thursday at the White House.

Comments (81)

  • shadowrider
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 10:36am

    We need to stop Panetta’s appointment by whatever means necessary !

    Report Post » shadowrider  
  • ED4237
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 10:28am

    Panneta to Defense that is as stupid a suggestion as was his appointment to the CIA. He will try and dismantle the military he has under his watch had the most leaks of any recent CIA director has every had. He obivously has not been good counsil to the pres because any body in the intell community knows this is a losing war and we need out you can only win a war if you kill your enemy. He should have been out there saying no to helping the released terrorist from gitmo we now are helpingt in that conflict way to go. Petraus is good man and military person I think he should go to the Defense post not Penneta.

    Report Post »  
  • mjgma
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 10:08am

    Why would you pull your commander from a war while in the midst of the conflict? Two reasons, one is purely for political purposes? Stop trying to get votes, let’s get the job done in the Middle East and then we can bring all our troops home. The other is, your commander is competent and you don’t want that.

    Report Post » mjgma  
    • ED4237
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 10:23am

      To keep the war going and that is why you pull the man from the war. As the CIA head Petraus would have to logic and say that the wars are stupid to keep going but thats not gonna happen he thinks he can win with a losing stratagy he has in place.

      Report Post »  
  • ThoreauHD
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 10:04am

    So apparently you don’t need experience in War to actually run military operations. Good to know.

    Report Post » ThoreauHD  
  • 5410amh
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 10:02am

    It’s bad for the troops to get a new commander EVERY YEAR. And I think obozo is pulling Petraeus out of afganistan because Petraeus would find a way to win even with all the restraints obozo has put in place. Remember Petraeus had great success in iraq, he turned that place around when it was considered a lost cause in 2007.

    Report Post »  
  • riseandshine
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 9:55am

    Something rotten is going on, no doubt.

    Report Post » riseandshine  
  • mtDiamonds
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 9:46am

    What the hell is this ??? . . this president is an idiot.. !!!

    Report Post »  
  • Rumsfeld
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 9:03am

    I never understood why Panetta was appointed in the first place!

    Report Post » Rumsfeld  
  • John 3:16
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 9:00am

    Hopefully Obimbo will have a one term limit.

    Report Post » John 3:16  
  • John 3:16
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:57am

    Maybe NOboma believes in TERM LIMITS for everyone?

    Report Post » John 3:16  
  • I-HATE-THE-WORD-DISENFRANCHISE
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:51am

    I agree, Petraeus is being set up. He appointed Petraeus to keep from looking bad in afganistan. He would make the obvious choice to replace Gates, unless you were wanted to start dismantling the military. May God bless our military and bring them home.

    Report Post »  
    • skiingcow
      Posted on April 28, 2011 at 9:14am

      I agree with you. Panetta is a lefty’s Leftist. Clearly if any man would be qualified for the Sec. of Defense job, it would be Patreus, so why make the shift at the CIA where he’s not particularly qualified or experienced? This decision making is almost like they WANT us to see the insanity of these proposed appointments. Panetta has been an abject failure as CIA chief – he should be REmoved, not simply MOVED, and certainly not moved to a position where he can tear apart the one area where no one in the world can hold a candle to America.

      Please contact your senators. NOW.

      Report Post »  
  • alcarfl
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:39am

    Where does that leave Clapper?

    Report Post »  
  • Sinista MACE
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:31am

    Great, now we have a neocon warmonger who makes jokes about illegally bombing Libya heading up the false-flag terrorists at the CIA, just like George “NEW WORLD ORDER” Bush Sr.

    We’re screwed.

    Get ready for some fantastic false-flag terror perpetrated by the CIA, who’s now headed by the person who was working with the Taliban in Afghanistan to move Heroin around the world. Not to mention the CIA, FBI, DEA, BATFE, and DEA working with the Sinaloa drug cartels, and AL QAEDA!!!

    AL QAEDA!
    TALIBAN!
    DRUG CARTELS!

    WAR ON TERROR
    WAR ON DRUGS
    WAR ON

    YOU!
    YOU!
    YOU!

    Report Post » V-MAN MACE  
  • liberalsarealiens
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:18am

    The only viable replacement would be OBUMBLER! I really think BO is starting to run scared! He just may be realizing he is a one term failure! NAW, what was I thinking?

    Report Post » liberalsarealiens  
  • Sandy
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:16am

    They want a sucker leading the troops having the ridiculous ‘rules of engagement’ there. I think they are having a difficult time finding that special sucker. Those Generals have to answer why to those under him. Most will tell him respectfully why it’s not good for their troops.

    Report Post » Sandy  
  • jeffyfreezone
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:13am

    Panetta was NEVER qualified for this job!

    Report Post »  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:01am

    Why do you change CIA directors after only 2 years? You would think he would just be getting up to speed.

    Report Post » Gonzo  
  • historypaper
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:00am

    The hard left and a little slow CIA Director Leon Panetta would make a great protector of freedom and liberty all over the world, except the United States.

    Report Post » historypaper  
    • staggerlee32
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:04am

      Why do you think the USA isn’t a player in The Book of Revelation?

      Report Post » staggerlee32  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:13am

      Sad isn’t it staggerlee?

      Report Post » Gonzo  
    • Grandmadar
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:23am

      @Staggerlee: proabably because we will have been rendered impotent. Our hands are being tied behind our backs. Or the unthinkable…

      We won’t even exist.

      Report Post »  
    • staggerlee32
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:59am

      @Gonzo
      Yes it is sad. Looks like the Progressives (Satan) did a great job transforming the USA over the past 100 years. Know wonder Gerbles loved Edward Bernays, he fooled a whole country. Thank God for the internet, it helped me wake up and find out the truth and I think many others too. But sadly might be too late.

      Report Post » staggerlee32  
  • patriotgal
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 7:53am

    What we need at this point is everyone concerned with our country and troops is to call for his IMPEACHMENT !!! He in this 2 1/2 years has committed many impeachable offenses. I called my house member yesterday once again and told him to impeach.

    Report Post »  
  • kickagrandma
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 7:52am

    The only GOOD SHAKE UP would be if REAL AMERICANS, PATRIOTIC AMERICANS could run the show without interference from politicos.

    Where is Mitch Rapp when we need him????

    JESUS, don‘t YOU think it’s getting close to another “Temple Cleansing” moment? We have some places YOU could begin…..

    PLEASE, LORD, bring our troops from all over the world safely home now. Maybe, this “home” should be HOME, because that’s where we all are going to be pretty quick here, it looks like.

    Thank YOU, LORD, for this day YOU have given us. We will rejoice and be glad in it. We will pray. We will do whatever YOU need us to do and go wherever YOU need us to go.

    We love YOU, LORD. IN JESUS’ NAME, AMEN!

    Report Post »  
    • Grandmadar
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:21am

      Yes, Grandma, Where is the Mitch Rapps! I like that. I am sure we have them but they don’t have permission to operate I am guessing.
      I always wonder how the Secret Service, FBI etc can stand to watch all that is going on.

      “If my people who are called by my Name…..”

      Report Post »  
  • jblovesAmerica
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 7:50am

    Poindexter is a POS-he will cut the defense dept to shreds.
    Petraus willecome the fall guy with no power.
    BHO is detroying the military as predicted.

    Report Post »  
    • warrior21
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 1:19pm

      Right, BHO is destroying the military as predicted. And he has the Joint Chiefs and Petraeus helping him. Petraeus didn‘t win in Iraq and couldn’t win in Afghanistan. His so-called surge was no more than a re-enforcement of troops and a lot of money to give to the Iraqis governers, a tactic as old war.

      Report Post » warrior21  
  • Obama Snake Oil Co
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 7:48am

    I wonder what the communist in charge is thinking?

    Report Post » Obama Snake Oil Co  
    • Libby Tarian
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 7:51am

      Mr. Barry Soetoro is the tergiversator in chief. Warmonger and baby killer.

      Report Post » Libby Tarian  
  • RLTW
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 7:47am

    At some point can one General Officer decide to honor his oath and not cooperate with this Marxist?

    Report Post »  
    • staggerlee32
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 7:53am

      Wouldn’t that be nice…. they must be being bribed with leading the NWO’s military.

      Report Post » staggerlee32  
  • Mackerel
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 7:44am

    What we need is someone to replace Obama.

    Report Post » Mackerel  
  • emertz8413
    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 7:44am

    I don’t know much about war, but changing officials constantly can’t be good for the troops, or for our battle plans. But, that is what this administration wants, chaos. I’m at the point where I want all of our troops back home and safe. I don’t believe for an instant that this president cares what happens to them!!!!

    Report Post »  
    • staggerlee32
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 7:52am

      They want them over there. They can’t have a few hundred thousand of the best trained soldiers on the planet here in the US to defend the Constitution from enemies both foriegn and DOMESTIC. Why do you think “O” is building his own military that is “as well trained and funded” as the US Military?

      Report Post » staggerlee32  
    • staggerlee32
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 7:58am

      I’m sure the Americorps military (O’s military) doesn’t have to put their hand on a Bible let alone pledge to defend the Constitution. CAN SOMEONE FROM THE BLAZE FIND OUT, PLEASE?

      staggerlee32  
    • MidWestMom
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:13am

      What experience does Panetta have that would make him a choice for Sec of Defense?

      Report Post »  
    • MidWestMom
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:17am

      Quick Fact Check:
      – In 1964, he joined the United States Army as a Second Lieutenant. There he received the Army Commendation Medal, and was discharged in 1966 as a First Lieutenant.

      So he has 2 years military experience. BTW, he did not attend a military college or enroll in ROTC etc.

      Report Post »  
    • hauschild
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:27am

      Panetta? You’ve gotta be kidding me??? That dude is the quintessential crony and rarely can tell you what time of day it is.

      It’s literally the blind leading the blind with this corrupt admin.

      Report Post »  
    • jblovesAmerica
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:39am

      i’m afraid i am having the same thoughts.
      bring those kids home.never to leave again for some God forsaken land-where those we are trying to help=kill us.

      Report Post »  
    • BetterDays
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 9:25am

      And they are both members of the Council on foreign relations. So now we have Geitner, Obama, Larry summers, Michele Obama, Barak’s name was removed from the list but was there prior to the elections, Stephanopoulos, Soros, and so many more I’d go way beyod the new blaze character allotment guideline if I were to list them all. But go see the names at CFR.org

      Report Post »  
    • ME
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 9:39am

      @staggerlee32

      Does TSA swear to protect and serve the constitution? I almost laugh as I ask that?

      I think the Unions are BO’s army he spends more time with them then anyone else including his commanders.

      Report Post » ME  
    • MontanaRob
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 9:42am

      This may go to something I have been thinking about lately.

      My concern is this, if Iran attacks Isreal, and Isreal retaliates, Russia is likely to threaten or attack Isreal as well. Obama has already stated that we won’t use our nukes. What would our military do?

      Do you think that everyone in the Pentagon would just ignore our closest ally in the middle east?

      Would there be a division that would form on this, or has there already been one and there is a purge going on (as I have thought has been happening for some time now) to remove those who aren’t in “the progressive globalist loop”?

      Report Post » MontanaRob  
    • Love Bandit Bestid
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 10:21am

      Panetta is a danger to America.
      He is Obama’s key man, in both his rise to power,
      and their effort to destroy America.

      Report Post » Iman Barak Hussein  
    • independentvoteril
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 12:10pm

      MOVING the CHESS pieces during the game BAD PLAN.. however.. wasn’t it the LEFT that made fun of Petraeus just a FEW years back??? DON’T hear much about that now do you as he gets promoted UP the ladder..

      Report Post » independentvoteril  
    • Mandors
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 2:01pm

      So the guy who was totally asleep at the wheel as the Middle East blew up, as Pakistan’s ISI supported the Taliban, and as China hacked whatever information it wants, is going to run the military? The person who oversaw the greatest intelligence debacle since Kim Philby?

      Report Post » Mandors  
    • sWampy
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 3:24pm

      Now that most of the top is gay/homosexual/whatever and can be openly so, expect more and more breakups. ;-(

      Report Post »  
    • techengineer11
      Posted on April 27, 2011 at 8:45pm

      Gates said he were over extended and could not afford another War in Lybia.. So bring in Panetta a Jew to kill more Arabs? Amazing how the reign in this nation and you ignorant fools can’t even see it!
      I bet if he was a Muslim you’d be doing backward flips?

      Report Post » techengineer11  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In