AP‘s ’Fact Check‘ Hammers Obama’s Speech
- Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:06am by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
WASHINGTON (AP) — There may be less than meets the eye to President Barack Obama’s statements Monday night that NATO is taking over from the U.S. in Libya and that U.S. action is limited to defending people under attack there by Moammar Gadhafi’s forces.
In transferring command and control to NATO, the U.S. is turning the reins over to an organization dominated by the U.S., both militarily and politically. In essence, the U.S. runs the show that is taking over running the show.
And the rapid advance of rebels in recent days strongly suggests they are not merely benefiting from military aid in a defensive crouch, but rather using the multinational force in some fashion — coordinated or not — to advance an offensive.
Here is a look at some of Obama’s assertions in his address to the nation Monday, and how they compare with the facts:
___
OBAMA: “Our most effective alliance, NATO, has taken command of the enforcement of the arms embargo and no-fly zone. … Going forward, the lead in enforcing the no-fly zone and protecting civilians on the ground will transition to our allies and partners, and I am fully confident that our coalition will keep the pressure on Gadhafi’s remaining forces. In that effort, the United States will play a supporting role.”
THE FACTS: As by far the pre-eminent player in NATO, and a nation historically reluctant to put its forces under operational foreign command, the United States will not be taking a back seat in the campaign even as its profile diminishes for public consumption.
NATO partners are bringing more into the fight. But the same “unique capabilities” that made the U.S. the inevitable leader out of the gate will continue to be in demand. They include a range of attack aircraft, refueling tankers that can keep aircraft airborne for lengthy periods, surveillance aircraft that can detect when Libyans even try to get a plane airborne, and, as Obama said, planes loaded with electronic gear that can gather intelligence or jam enemy communications and radars.
The United States supplies 22 percent of NATO’s budget, almost as much as the next largest contributors — Britain and France — combined. A Canadian three-star general was selected to be in charge of all NATO operations in Libya. His boss, the commander of NATO’s Allied Joint Force Command Naples, is an American admiral, and the admiral’s boss is the supreme allied commander Europe, a post always held by an American.
___
OBAMA: “Our military mission is narrowly focused on saving lives.”
THE FACTS: Even as the U.S. steps back as the nominal leader, reduces some assets and fires a declining number of cruise missiles, the scope of the mission appears to be expanding and the end game remains unclear.
Despite insistences that the operation is only to protect civilians, the airstrikes now are undeniably helping the rebels to advance. U.S. officials acknowledge that the effect of air attacks on Gadhafi’s forces — and on the supply and communications links that support them — is useful if not crucial to the rebels. “Clearly they‘re achieving a benefit from the actions that we’re taking,” Navy Vice Adm. William Gortney, staff director for the Joint Chiefs, said Monday.
The Pentagon has been turning to air power of a kind more useful than high-flying bombers in engaging Libyan ground forces. So far these have included low-flying Air Force AC-130 and A-10 attack aircraft, and the Pentagon is considering adding armed drones and helicopters.
Obama said “we continue to pursue the broader goal of a Libya that belongs not to a dictator, but to its people,” but spoke of achieving that through diplomacy and political pressure, not force of U.S. arms.
___
OBAMA: Seeking to justify military intervention, the president said the U.S. has “an important strategic interest in preventing Gadhafi from overrunning those who oppose him. A massacre would have driven thousands of additional refugees across Libya’s borders, putting enormous strains on the peaceful – yet fragile – transitions in Egypt and Tunisia.” He added: “I am convinced that a failure to act in Libya would have carried a far greater price for America.”
THE FACTS: Obama did not wait to make that case to Congress, despite his past statements that presidents should get congressional authorization before taking the country to war, absent a threat to the nation that cannot wait.
“The president does not have the power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation,” he told The Boston Globe in 2007 in his presidential campaign. “History has shown us time and again … that military action is most successful when it is authorized and supported by the legislative branch.”
Obama’s defense secretary, Robert Gates, said Sunday that the crisis in Libya “was not a vital national interest to the United States, but it was an interest.”
___
OBAMA: “And tonight, I can report that we have stopped Gadhafi’s deadly advance.”
THE FACTS: The weeklong international barrage has disabled Libya’s air defenses, communications networks and supply chains. But Gadhafi’s ground forces remain a potent threat to the rebels and civilians, according to U.S. military officials.
Army Gen. Carter Ham, the top American officer overseeing the mission, told The New York Times on Monday that “the regime still overmatches opposition forces militarily. The regime possesses the capability to roll them back very quickly. Coalition air power is the major reason that has not happened.”
Only small numbers of Gadhafi’s troops have defected to the opposition, Ham said.
At the Pentagon, Vice Adm. William Gortney, staff director for the Joint Chiefs, said the rebels are not well organized. “It is not a very robust organization,” he said. “So any gain that they make is tenuous based on that.”
___
OBAMA: “Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different. And as president, I refused to wait for the images of slaughter and mass graves before taking action.”
THE FACTS: Mass violence against civilians has also been escalating elsewhere, without any U.S. military intervention anticipated.
More than 1 million people have fled the Ivory Coast, where the U.N. says forces loyal to the incumbent leader, Laurent Gbagbo, have used heavy weapons against the population and more than 460 killings have been confirmed of supporters of the internationally recognized president, Alassane Ouattara.
The Obama administration says Gbagbo and Gadhafi have both lost their legitimacy to rule. But only one is under attack from the U.S.
Presidents typically pick their fights according to the crisis and circumstances at hand, not any consistent doctrine about when to use force in one place and not another. They have been criticized for doing so — by Obama himself.
In his pre-presidential book “The Audacity of Hope,” Obama said the U.S. will lack international legitimacy if it intervenes militarily “without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands.”
He questioned: “Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur?”
Now, such questions are coming at him.
___
Associated Press writers Jim Drinkard and Robert Burns contributed to this report.




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (292)
teapartychristiannc
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:14amthis man wouldnt know the truth even if he read it on a teleprompter!
Report Post »WHITE LOTUS2x
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:11amI havnt seen an obama bumper sticker in a very long time. They scratched those things off pretty fast. The last I saw was on a car full of latinos, and that is the truth. If he does get reelected , and thats a big o if, it will be the unions, illegals, the likes of acorn, teachers and radical students that dont want to be bothered with a job getting in the way of their schooling. Heck fire, thats quite a few votes there. We better all make sure we vote, even with all that we are still the majority, I think. White Lotus.
Report Post »POIPNE
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 10:14amUhh, LOTUS,
Report Post »You might want to report that car with the bumper sticker – it’s probably stolen! I agree we can vote Mr Teleprompter out in ‘12. Of course, we‘ll have to get past Holder’s “people” standing outside the poling places with the night sticks to do it.
Magic_Christian
Posted on March 30, 2011 at 4:27amAnd SEIU ‘clerks’ counting the votes after they are cast (definition: cast – placed in the ballot box by whoever has the opportunity to stuff it.)
Report Post »jim
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:07amThe Orwellian masquerade takes a bizarre right turn into Libya.
Report Post »whereareyourbrains
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:07amQaddifi???? How about who is going to remove Obama from power. He is overstepping the constitution. Why isn’t congress stopping him in the wallet. Get out of all of these wars. Get out of the countries we are now in. Take care of us. We have done the most of what we could in Iraq and Afgh. and Germany, and Korea, etc. STop Obama from turning AMerica into an Islam country.
Report Post »dizzyinthedark
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:04amFrom day one, this imposter has belittled us, frowned upon us, told us how it’s going to be, pushing us aside and feeds us lies every time he stands before a camera–I’m not looking for anything more out of this non-leader.
Can we get someone to blow up that statue of the hand crushing one of our jets–that would make happy!
Report Post »sodacrackers2
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:57amWhat statue is that?
Report Post »vtech61
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:02amSnowleopard wrote:
One thing I am wondering about though, who is setting up Obama to
take a fall for when those of the left and progressives of all sides
need a scapegoat to cover their tracks while they regroup.
+++++++++++
Look no further than the Clinton camp.
My theory: They DID find some pretty damming evidence that Obama
was NOT eligible to run as POTUS.
No long for birth cert. for one.
Or perhaps, that he lied on his school applications (fraud) to get
tax dollars to go to college.
They used this information to make him follow their old agenda.
Think about it.
All of a sudden, Hillary is out of the race.
Yet Hillary’s old Health Care agenda is picked right up by Obama?
And Hillary takes a back seat, silent about one of her and Bill’s legacy agenda items,
that did NOT get through while Bill was POTUS.
Remember when Bill was at the podium some months ago?
Explaining the HC bill (IIRC)?
Unprecedented that an Ex POTUS is at the podium
of a sitting president, explaining a sitting president’s political position.
I could say more but I know how these guys operate,
so I’ll let others speculate further.
But bottom line, I think there are people behind the curtain pulling all the strings.
Connect the dots.
Look at how Obama is bumbling everything, from immigration
laws to illegal military action.
Now who in the dem. party can ‘attempt’ to ride in one her
white steed to save us all from this abomination.
Hillary Clinton 2012.
Report Post »USACommoner
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 1:56pmI agree that obama is someone’s puppet…someone’s cocky, attitudinal puppet. He may be “intelligent” in his own right, but there is definitely someone else standing behind the curtain. He is merely a willing participant in this whole charade. I did not listen to, nor watch, the speech last evening. I‘ve arrived at the conclusion that any time this man’s lips are moving, there are nothing but lies being emitted. I just pray that more and more people will also come to this same conclusion…
Report Post »El Love
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 5:11pmI have said it before — a couple of weeks ago an article in which Hillary said she will not run for president in 2012 and that once she completes her position as Secretary of State for this term, she will bow out of public office for good. Don’t you believe it for a minute. When she said this, I said “she is going to run against Obama in 2012”. Remember when she said she would not use the office of Senator of New York as a platform to run for President??? Well, that is EXACTLY what she used her position as Senator for.
Yes, she and Bill know a lot more than they claimed about Obamas legitimacy. She hinted at it on the campaign trail. but she too, is a puppet of the Bilderberg group. She took Obama to a secret meeting — You are right when you said she will ride in on her white steed to save the Dumbocratic party and eh hem, the country and umm the world!!!
Hillary was set up to look “Presidential” during the intial phases of this Lybia debacle. And the press picked up the softball and ran with it. The media is so weak that they are led around by the noses and do exactly what they are being manipulated into doing.
Time for conservatives to get LOUD. talk to anyone and everyone about what is going on. Take every opportunity to blame obama and the dems for everything that is wrong right now and will be for the next 40 years. Talk in grocery lines, talk at work, talk to friends, send out important news like this to everyone you can.
Report Post »Ammaof3
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:01amI have always contended that Obama was nothing more than a puppet for the progressives. He has shown himself to be incapable of truly leading in any sense. His own country’s citizens are fighting each other, the economy is in the toilet, and he has made us appear weak before the other countries of the world. What a joke! He was what my uncle used to refer to as an “A honor roll idiot”.
Report Post »HistoryStudent
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:39amHe truly is an honor roll idiot and there’s plenty more where he came from.
Report Post »9thCommandment
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:53amI guess AP got tired of the saying “You can’t spell crap without AP.” However the stench is still there, maybe the useful idiots are starting to see the future.
Report Post »starman70
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 10:22amLet’s see if Chris Matthews has the tingling feeling up his legs over this speech.
Report Post »moonpeace
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:52amYes, it took way too long, but many are now seeing the error of their ways in voting for the unqualified Obama. He has very little chance of being re-elected in 012…that is, unless ACORN or some similar lying, cheating, liberal organization can come to his rescue again. I am so glad I didn’t vote for Obama. Can you imagine having to still drive around with an Obama sticker on your car? How humiliatng would that be?
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:54amYou have more confidence in the American people than I do at this point. I hope you’re right.
Report Post »Amateur_Radio_Operator
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 5:02pmYeah I’m with Gonzo…. but I’ll take it a step further, our votes don’t count. The fix has been in for years. I still vote ‘just in case’ it may still work, but I have no faith in it.
Report Post »Hugie 59 PA
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:51amHats off to AP since they usually spin to the left instead of the truth.
Report Post »Deane
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:51amIs Gadhafi hiding in a spider hole yet….just wondering
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:46am“Let me be blunt” Mr. President, W. spent a trillion to depose a dangerous dicatator and free the Iraqi people. He accomplished it. You, on the other hand spent a trillion to keep unemployment below 8%. How’s that working out, you pompous a$$?
Report Post »RLTW
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:36amHe’s nothing but a primitive chieftain (progressive) attempting to guilt his tribe (far left progressives) into believing his path to the future is the best direction.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:35amBiden say he would seek impeachment if Bush went to war with congressional approval. Obama did and where’s Biden now….hmmmm
Report Post »NC
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:33amSo the AP is fact checking the POTUS and calling him out. What’s next – Bill Ayers admitting he wrote Obama’s book?
NC (Bill Ayers will probably make The Blaze today, if he is not already there)
Report Post »Igno Ramus
Posted on March 30, 2011 at 10:49amBill Ayers SHOULD blaze and soon.
Report Post »thebardofmurdock
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:30amHarvard Men At War
From up upon the podium in tailored suit and tie,
Between the flags of freedom crossed, and in the public eye,
The Harvard man made his address to critics, in reply,
And laid out for the audience his modern battle cry.
Recall that other Harvard man, who at the San Juan Hill,
Did call ‘Rough Riders, follow me!’ and led the charge until
The foot soldiers and cavalry were summoned by his will,
And overcame the enemy with valor and with skill.
Not for our modern Crimson man do words like those resound,
For in their stark grave melody is heroism found.
Instead we hear of diplomats who finally come around,
And handing off the fighting with no boots upon the ground.
So rally ’round the UN flag: we fight for powder blue!
Leave well behind the stars and stripes, and patriotic hue.
We’ll fight for days or weeks for sure, and then we’ll say adieu,
And hope our allies have resolve and heart to follow through.
thebardofmurdock.com
Report Post »shazam3
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 11:19amShow me the truth he actually graduated or even attended Harvard or for that matter even is an American citizen………..
Report Post »taebaggranny
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 2:11pm@ THEBARDOFMURDOCK Great prose!!!
Report Post »Elephantinroom
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:02pmVery nicely done!
Report Post »Igno Ramus
Posted on March 30, 2011 at 10:41amFantastic post. Artfully done. Nice to read a modern poem that actually has RHYME AND METER.
Report Post »Igno Ramus
Posted on March 30, 2011 at 10:46am@ TEABAGGRANNY
Report Post »Sorry, Dear. Prose has neither rhyme nor meter sorta like a novel or a M. Angeliou “poem”.
Poetry in its TRUE form has both rhyme and meter. That’s why poems become songs and novels do not. (Neither do M. Angeliou’s)
eyestoseeearstohear
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:27amObama is just going to continue to lie his way through until his NWO is accomplished.
The sudden “ change of leadership” in a series of Countries – is nothing more than a behind the scene action, causing the people to rise up against it‘s gov’t – whiich a SELECTED gov‘t is put in as it’s replacement…
Don‘t think Soro’s is behind this? Think again.
Don’t think Obama knows about it? Think again.
And, when ALL gov‘t’s have been put into place – WE (AMERICA) will be surrounded by extreme enemies….with Obama working WITH THEM to FINISH bringing us under their command.
Obama is a PLANT…he is NOT a US Citizen – this presidency is as FAKE & PHONEY,as he is.
He has lied about EVERYTHING from start to present – and a LOT on hill is EQUALLY working to accomplish this NWO…and I pray and have faith that IT WILL BE REVEALED IN A SHORT TIME.
THOSE INVOLVED SHOULD BE CHARGED AND IMPRISONED….PREFERABLY WORSE!
Report Post »Obama is attempting to PULL THE BIGGEST, GREATEST CON-JOB ON AMERICA, EVER.
I hate that he has done this harm to our country and I pray he suffers personally for it.
NickDeringer
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:22amOur non-president gave a non-speech and it was filled with lies. But if you don’t like this one just wait a few weeks and he change his mind.
Report Post »Okieflyover
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 3:38pmWhy was this at a teleprompter in front of an audience? How much did they pay for that access to the President?
Could he not have done this at the Oval office or was he still locked out?
Report Post »Helldogger
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:20amSo Lybia is in the North Atlantic?!?!?!? I DiD NOT know that!
Report Post »The next president is gonna have her hands full.
tinydd
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:44amBarry probably meant that when flying a jet to Libya at 40,000ft, you can see the North Atlantic.
Or maybe another damn glitch in the prompter?
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:19amIt was nice of the POTUS to find the time to talk to the country about the military action he initiated. He’s a busy guy, what with all the parties, vacations, golf and basketball tournaments. We are just so lucky he makes time for us ignorant, Bible thumping, gun toting, peons between the coasts.
Report Post »Helldogger
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:18amSo libya is in the North Atlantic?!?!?! I did NOT know that!
Report Post »The next president is surely gonna have her hands full.
icareabouttheusa
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:20amDon’t forget we have 57 states!
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:28amOr the one Senator who thought the island where the marines will relocate to would tip over from all the people on it.
Report Post »UncleBuck
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:50amIt’s ok the aliens will come down from their space ship with Mohammad in one hand and Obamba in the other and add another 7 states, prop up the Island and move the North Atlantic to the Mediterranean. And we’ll have Calypso Louie and Jeremiah Wright preachin to us 24×7. While Bill Ayers and friends are building bombs and rewriting history to make it seem like we wandered in to Willy Wonka’s Chocolate Factory!
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:17amSo once again the POTUS is attempting to rewrite history and his own double sided stories; he does only what he choses, for no reasons of consistency and logic. Just what will advance his own set of ideals and agenda for the progressives and his muslum apologies tours.
Obama will go down in history as one of the worst, or the worst of the Presidents this nation has ever had the misfortune to elect.
Report Post »Blackhawk1
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:41am@Snowleopard
So true. Jimmy Carter is smiling now.
Report Post »Igno Ramus
Posted on March 30, 2011 at 10:32amDon’t forget Woody.
Report Post »jerryod1627
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:17amWhy would one waste their time listening to obama? Everything he says is either deception or an outright lie!
Report Post »tinydd
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:55amI didn’t, I watched two and half men reruns. Who cares what a low ranking “Coalition Member” has to say.
Really?
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:54amI didn’t watch the charlatan….I really don’t care what he has to say. Unless he wants to resign
Report Post »starman70
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:56amI didn’t watch Obummer either, I watched WWE. At least there you know the show you are watching is a show and not claptrap being passed off as reality.
Report Post »drbage
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 10:39amAP would have had an easier job if they had just gone through to point out any instances of truth in the speech. Those who see with open eyes noticed how desparate this regime is to make itself appear legitimate and a true reflection of the American people. He surrounds himself with flags and dresses himself up in matching colors so as to fade into the background of the flags and seem like a voice arising from them. Gone was the shimmering gold Kente cloth facsimile and the winning the future backdrop, too. The teleprompter-in-chief was moved so as to make us believe that the one was speaking directly to us. Included the use of God and country to make us feel warm and fuzzy.
Report Post »To lessen the gravitas of the lecture, it was not held in the Oval Office.
Showtime
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 11:24amI worked in the yard. My time was better spent reworking a drainage problem than by listening to him, and it looks a lot better out there!
Report Post »heavyduty
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:14amI can’t believe that the so-called President of these here United States is actually trying to take credit for what happened in Libya. Can the Democrats get anymore lame and the people of AMERICA stand by and let them get away with it. Obama was on vacation while the people of Libya was being slaughtered and now he is trying to say that he is a leader. Then trying to compare this to the Iraq war? Just how lame can you get.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:27amSometimes I have to wonder if Obama is indeed becoming a pawn of the progressives, to be used as a final scapegoat if or when everything falls apart for their plans. One thing have been bothering me for a time now.
Under Obama care law, when the one fed judge concluded the entire law was unconstitutional, he gave one part of the explination for his actions, if I remmember it correctly, that no provision in the law was made so that if one part was ruled such, the rest would be left in place. In short all or nothing.
It seems as if the law was passed just for the chaos it would cause, and as if expected to go down in flames either under repeal in congress or the courts.
So I do wonder if he is being set up for a larger agenda under the shadows of Obama.
Report Post »Bermuda Onion
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:32amHey, you can’t say that! He had all the little toy soldiers spread out on the oval office table. He commanded those soldiers and by doing so he commanded our soldiers in the Libyan thingy. I pray for ALL of our men and women of the American forces because their so called leader is SOOOOOOO inept that it should scare the hell out of all the parents and loved ones that sent them over there and everywhere else.
Report Post »bry
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:32amThe speech was filled with half truths, truth spins and verbal calisthenics to avoid jeapady of letting the real truth be uncovered.
Report Post »The setting where he gave his speech was the biggest lie of all. Did you notice ALL the Americans Flags behind and around Obama? This man that avoids Old Glory so steadfastly, you would think the sight of it would blind him. The fact they they were on scene and plentiful was just a prop to make him look like he actually likes and cares for the US of A.
felina g
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:00amIs the AP “fanning the flames” of a Constitutional crisis at a time of world vulnerablity in some sort of “bottom up” strategy ?
When TRUST is gone there is chaos. Hmmmm ?
Report Post »LadyIzShy
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:14amnice to see AP doing a half decent job for once
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:20amThe AP has finally turned on Obama apperantly in this case; could it be possible they are waking up to the continuous illogic of the administration, to the lies and distortions and inconsistencies always going on from them as well?
I for one hope so, along with most of the rest of the press.
One thing I am wondering about though, who is setting up Obama to take a fall for when those of the left and progressives of all sides need a scapegoat to cover their tracks while they regroup.
Report Post »Lesterp
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:22amYea, What in the heck got into them?
Report Post »GONESURFING
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:39amGood job AP, anybody surprised that Obama lies.
Report Post »Gold Coin & Economic News
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:41amYou know things are bad for the Liar In Chief when the AP turns against him. Maybe he’s just such a stooge they want to get rid of him and see to it that a better liberal takes the stage in 2012. Is there a liberal better qualified to run in 2012?
Report Post »Marcobob69
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:55amYes, it is “refreshing’ to finally see one of the media outlets actually “doing their jobs” instead of whitewashing everything rosy for the Obama administration. Now if we could just get the other outlets to do the same…….Ah, Rome wasn’t built in a day, so we will have to wait awhile for that…..!!!
Report Post »ISeeDanger.com
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:58amFact checking?
With this guy?
Please, how many people can they hire. They don’t have the staff for it.
http://www.ISeeDanger.com
Report Post »marhee9
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:59amWow, did the AP forget who is president? Good to see at least a hint of real journalism from the liberal media. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=619wI12Ky20
Report Post »Miguelito
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:07amAP has not earned my trust yet. Not if they continue to tell the truth I might give them a little credit. We know Obama is the liar in chief and is dishonest. Good job for once AP but watch out Media Matters will try to discredit you if you keep this up.
Report Post »Obama Bin Lying
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:14amThe Obama Doctrine should be called the Hokey Pokey.
Report Post »Mee the People
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:28amobummer surrendered and apoligized for US
Report Post »GreatAmericanBeckFan
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:34amWith Obama just assume everything he says is a lie until proven otherwise and sadly that is not an exaggeration.
Report Post »felina g
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:38amThis move is nothing but a test to see if our “leader” can direct military action through NATO without an OK from Congress.
World governance.
Looks like he got away with it.
Report Post »ishka4me
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:44amno fly zone? see we shot down hundreds of flying tanks then.If we dont get kudaffi, what is to stop he and his agents from bombing or terrorism against us like before. if we have no boots on the ground, hwe can hunker down for a long while in tripoli.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:47am@ishka4me
“watched msnbc for their reaction. Of course they love this war.”
Of course they do. It’s their Glorious Leader launching it, unconstitutionally, so it’s perfectly peachy to them. On the other hand, if this were Dubya, 95% of the people posting on this thread would be swooning at how wonderful it was that we were doing this.
There is very little absolute principle that is not open to the Party Syndrome left in America these days. Everybody is enraged by the opposition doing wrong, but are blind to their own side doing it. It’s sad and rather pathetic.
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:53amHa! The latest news is there’s a “delay” in the NATO “take-over”
Report Post »TexasCommonSense
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:54amOBAMA: “Our most effective alliance, NATO, has taken command of the enforcement of the arms embargo and no-fly zone”.
BREAKING NEWS:
NATO reportedly puts planned takeover of Libya mission on hold as U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. says the White House hasn‘t ruled out arming rebels in their fight against Qaddafi’s forces.
Ooops.
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:11amPresident Obama is learning that being President is more than photo ops. He actually has to make decisions. Maybe he thought it would be more like a dictatorship?
Report Post »ishka4me
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:11amN.A.T.O. North atlantic treaty right, designed for mutual protection of Europe and the United States. I am sorry, but I didn’t see any Nato nation attacked, threatened with attack or even talked to sternly from lybia. I could almost undertand the U.N. going in, but Nato?
Report Post »Love Bandit Bestid
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:17amHow bout confronting the mother of all evil governments…CHINA?
never gonna happen.
obama only helps where radical muslims will prevail.
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:32amBHO has got to GO!!!
Report Post »Blackhawk1
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:37am@GhostOfJefferson
If you recall, Dubya did get congressional approval unlike Obama. Also after Bush Sr pulled us out of Operation Desert Storm due to liberal pressures I had a feeling we would be going back to take care of Saddam Hussein.
Report Post »101
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:42amHELPING THE REBELS “Al-Qaida” is winning in Libya, and with Obama’s help Al-Qaida “the rebels” will take over Qaddafi so our enemy will have a string hold “safe haven” to regroup with free US supplied arms to fight against our US forces in Iraq & Afghanistan!
Our President is such a world loser!
Report Post »mill
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:44amOBAMA NEEDS to be taken out of office. he is an affront to everything this nation has ever fought for. That was simple to say, but it won’t happen..wait and see, he will go back into office, esp if there are 3 parties.
Report Post »akelso
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:46amThey‘re just mad because we’re in a 3rd war…I don’t care what you call it. And AP have decided to give an totally honest piece, including any facts that may “harm” O. instead of the usual deflection. But you’re right Lady, it’s nice to see them lean back Right a little.
Report Post »MinorityRightsAdvocate
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 10:14amDon’t get too optimistic, perhaps they have “turned” on him because the lies are so blatent they just can’t cover for it any longer.
Look for the new talking point I’ve heard several times now: That the President has information the rest of don’t have and therefore we can’t understand the brilliance of these policies!
I even heard the morning show on Washington Times Radio, supposedly conservative, repeat that garbage.
Think about it, is that not the perfect way to cover any inexplicable decisions and lull the rest of us in to submission?
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 10:29am@Blackhawk1
“If you recall, Dubya did get congressional approval unlike Obama. ”
That’s not a declaration of war, it was just Congress say “yeah, ok, whatever”. We either have rule of law, or we do not. I don’t cotton to playing fast and loose with Constitutionality.
Also after Bush Sr pulled us out of Operation Desert Storm due to liberal pressures I had a feeling we would be going back to take care of Saddam Hussein.
Report Post »drphil69
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 10:30amgreat job AP! I hope I don’t have to wait another 6 years for your next good report!
Report Post »Bullcop34
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 10:33amI said it once before….We need a true military leader to tell the president NO. We will not follow you when you violate the constitution. We will not send troops into harms way without approval from congress. And yes, this statement goes to all the previous presidents that got us into crap worldwide since 1941.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 11:10amAaaaaaahhh – Even the Associated Press can see that ‘Obama’s lips were moving!’
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 11:20am@ishka4me
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:11am
N.A.T.O. North atlantic treaty right, designed for mutual protection of Europe and the United States. I am sorry, but I didn’t see any Nato nation attacked, threatened with attack or even talked to sternly from lybia. I could almost undertand the U.N. going in, but Nato?
~~~~~~~~~~~~
I wondered about that, too. Here’s the NATO link for more information and a timeline:
http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_71652.htm?
They are following UN resolutions.
Report Post »ablisterin
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 11:39amWhy are there so many pictures of obama with his head centered in the presidential seal as if to make it look like a halo around his noggin???
Report Post »butterfly53
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 11:41amI feel so helpless as this asshat president of ours gets us into another war. As we are hemorraging money, as we have no jobs, as my bussiness is near closing, as our country is turned into just another EU style nation and as the muslims and the hispanics take over. obama sickens me and I dispise him.
Report Post »raelababe
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 11:52amI wouldn’t count my “AP doing fair reporting” just yet. We still need to check and double-check
Report Post »independentvoteril
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 12:09pm@LadyIzShy.. Yes they DO have there moments.. not many I say .. but here and there…
Report Post »just the facts
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 1:07pmYep, things are turning against this inept wanna-be so called leader – BUT, the damage he and his party and the progressive movement has committed and still in the process of committing, has all but destroyed the people and the country of our United States. Times and things have NOT gotten bad yet. I am willing to wager that 85% of the people in this country is not, will not and can not prepare for the up coming events. And of the people who do see whats going on, I think maybe only 7 to 10 percent are what I would adequately prepared. Yep, we get the reporting after the fact.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 1:27pmObama LIES? ??? Well of course he was .. his LIPS were moving (along with his teleprompter)!!!!
POTUS/TOTUS LIES!
The Congress should take note and ACTION against the “going to Congress one” .. BIGTIME!
Report Post »ltb
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 1:50pmAccording to West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center, the part of Libya where anti-Gaddafi rebels are based is a hornet’s nest full of anti-American Islamofascists that produces more Jihadist infiltrators into Iraq per capita than any other Muslim country. Seeing a pattern here with Obama, folks? If rebels hate America (e.g., Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Jihadists in Libya), Obama backs them, if protesters are pro-American (e.g., students in Iran), Obama lets them get slaughtered.
Why do I get the feeling that Obama could stand in the Rose Garden and yell “Death to America!” while burning an American flag and 46% of Americans would call Fox News racist for reporting it? We have a Muslim terrorist in the White House.
Report Post »taebaggranny
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 1:56pm@ LOVE BESTID But he told us that was what he would do when he was running for the Pres..Most people just didn’t listen to what he was actually saying after he said the key words HOPE & CHANGE…He said clearly that if there was a fight between Israel and the Muslim nations he would lead the U S and fight for the Muslims.. Someone that has access to the archives of his speeches during the campaign needs to dig this tape out and reshow it to the American people…
Report Post »Pakinpastor
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 2:26pmAnd, half a job at that. Didn‘t he say he got Congress’s approval? Maybe that was just another slip of the forked tongue.
Report Post »Anyway, keep your pantry well stocked, your prayer life up and your powder dry. This ain’t over…
Okieflyover
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 3:26pmI liked Obama‘s reference to thanking the Coast Guards’men (sp?). I didn’t know we had Coast Guard in the Gulf. News to me.
Did AP fact check that?
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 3:31pmInteresting to me, that there is no mention of the actual writers of the piece (the well-known) Calvin Woodward and Richard Lardner.
Report Post »UPSETVET
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 4:27pmObama’s speech about the war in Libya is just another fabrication of lies. The Liar in Chief wouldn’t know the truth if it jumped up and bit him on his hinny. More and more people are beginning to see Obama for what he really is and aren’t so easily swayed by his rhetorics any longer. Obama’s honeymoon presidency is almost over. More and more criticisms are coming from those who at one time thought he could do no wrong.
Report Post »avenger
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 7:17pma huge yawnnnnn….
Report Post »arx
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:41pmPeople need to WAKE UP. What is Obama doing but destroying our friends, or those who pose the least threat to us, and ignoring or actually helping our enemies? The revolt in Iran was ignored. Our ally in Egypt was trashed. The revolt in Syria is being ignored. Libya is being attacked, but does has Khadafi posed a threat to us for the last 10 years?
Obama is aiding and abetting our enemies, and attacking our friends. The end result of all this is that we will completely lose the middle east. This is either a diabolical scheme to put the ‘dream of his father’ into action, or he is the most incompetent boob the world has ever seen. Hang on, we’re in for a ride when we are still dependent upon an entirely hostile region for our energy. Israel has very dark clouds on the horizon.
Report Post »cemerius
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 9:21pmTHIS will gain no traction….ALL the msm’s will give that great big pass and crap on all of us “hillbillies clinging to guns and bibles”…..I am tired of being insignificant!
Report Post »Igno Ramus
Posted on March 30, 2011 at 10:19amBULLCOP34—-The President of the US is the Commander in Cheif of our armed forces. If a military commander is given a lawful order from the Pres., he/she is REQUIRED to obey it. It is extremely difficult to prove ‘unlawful’ ANY order given through the Chain of Command in a court of law. The court will be a MILITARY court or tribunal NOT a civilian one. Requirements pertaining to truth and lawful are very different under those circumstances. The penalties for disobedience are/or can be rather harsh according to civilian thinking. Under certain cercumstances, a person can forfeit their life by refusing to obey a direct order. Not so in civilian life. At WORST a person would be fired.
Report Post »