Are Occupy Oakland Members in Favor of Sex Trafficking? Wait Until You See What They Did
- Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:02pm by
Erica Ritz
- Print »
- Email »
Editor’s note: the following post contains graphic language and video. Discretion is advised.
On June 13, apparent members of Occupy Oakland staged a counter-protest at the H.E.A.T. (Human Exploitation and Trafficking) conference to end human exploitation and trafficking.
Why on earth would they do that? While the Occupy movement has long struggled with having a cohesive message, some of the signs indicated that rescuing girls from lives of prostitution constitutes racism, and that the police and “patriarchy” shouldn’t have control over such matters.
A Facebook page dedicated to the event explains: “The H.EAT. conference is a conference of pigs and their nonprofit lackeys to increase the harassment, imprisonment, marginalization and criminalization of sex workers. Fronting as a conference against ‘child trafficking,’ this conference brings pigs and nonprofits together to develop policing strategies that line their pockets…”
Blogger Zombie, who wrote an article about the protests, explained that “The protesters mostly were members of Occupy Oakland Patriarchy, a group within the overall Occupy movement tasked with overthrowing our civilization’s “patriarchy.” He gives more details on what happened:
If there’s one issue that unites Americans of all political stripes, it’s the sexual enslavement of children. Whatever our opinions on other issues, we all agree that sex trafficking and the prostituting of children is an outrage and a tragedy. Thus, conference attendees included liberal, moderate and conservative politicians; progressive nonprofit organizations; law enforcement groups; religious leaders…In short: Everybody.
Everybody, that is, except Occupy Wall Street, who somehow found a way to oppose the abolition of child sexual slavery. In order to justify this seemingly incomprehensible and repugnant position, the Occupiers performed some of the most amazing moral gymnastics you’ll ever encounter.
Here are a few photos of the event (warning: language):
An official statement that the protesters were handing out, according to PJ Media, partially read:
The official, police-sanctioned campaign to combat the commercial sex-trafficking of children is nothing more than a patronizing, patriarchal guise that is being used to support intensified repression of sex workers and the further empowerment of police agencies at their expense.
[...]
Ultimately, no form of work is truly consensual given the conditions of work under Capitalism. We all have to sell our labor to survive. But the conditions of sale are not equal for all of us. For some people, sex work is just a better choice, given the poverty of viable alternatives. It is only thanks to the power of religious institutions and their policing of morality that the spotlight gets shone onto those of us who labor physically in the bedroom. We reject any moral policing of our bodies. Clearly, human trafficking is a heinous practice, but the perpetual focus on sex is uncritically sensationalist, and its shock value is exploited by any anti-sex-trafficking groups present at the HEAT conference in pursuit of their own moralizing, often religious, agendas…[Emphasis added]
Watch video of how they disrupted the conference, chanting “f**k the police!” and mobbing the hotel, before pelting it with eggs and other liquids as security rapidly shut the doors, below:
PJ Media points out that the protesters seemed to espouse two contradictory opinions simultaneously:
1. We are sex workers and proud of it, and there is nothing wrong with prostitution, so stop oppressing us with your prudish laws; and
2. The only reason we are compelled to have this degrading and unpleasant profession is that capitalism forces people to exchange labor for money — only a total anti-capitalist revolution can put an end to prostitution.Now, needless to say, one would go insane trying to maintain both these ideas at the same time, which is apparently what has happened to the members of Occupy Oakland Patriarchy.
And if the signs weren’t enough, a post-protest summary from the “Bay of Rage” Occupy site writes:
Wh*res get [revenge.]
On Wednesday, June 13th, 2012, queers and hookers and other bad b*tches f**ked up the H.E.A.T. Watch conference. H.E.A.T. Watch is an ongoing campaign facilitated by the Alameda County District Attorney, The City of Oakland, the OPD, and a few select piece-of-sh*t non-profits.
We set out with the intentions of shutting the f**ker down and started the event with the distribution of some dope literature, some inflammatory speeches, the harassment of mainstream media and of course, the all-out taunting of the police. It got taken a step further when the crowd attempted to enter the lobby of the Marriott Convention Center. This all resulted in a rumble with the pigs, the vandalized facade of the convention center entrance with eggs and paint, and a march to and from Oscar Grant Plaza. We would say that this was a nice way to spend an afternoon and, for a brief moment, fulfilled our goal of shutting the f**ker down.
[…]
To our enemies the DA Nancy O’Malley, the christian scum bag Linda Smith and all the pigs and other such trash attending the conference: this is only a small taste of what some pissed off h*es are capable of. We acknowledge your invitation of war against sex workers and all those subjugated by the continued existence of capital. Bring it on motherf**kers.
[...]
Against exploitation,
B*tches who will f**k you up. [Emphasis added]
(H/T: PJ Media)

























Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (69)
BlessedONE333
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 5:38pmliberals HELPING ILLEGALS STAY IN THIS NATION
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/vol/3085845480.html
Report Post »Rohawk
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 5:48pmHow is this any different from liberals keeping palistinians in refugee camps as tools to hurt Israel, pushing ethanol even if it drives up corn prices and makes food too expensive for the poor, or keeping minorities undereducated in poor schools so they can’t earn or think their way out of the ghettos? Liberals have agendas that need victims to promote. If confined to logic liberalism is a long-term loser every time.
Report Post »@leftfighter
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 6:13pmSo it appears the word of the pay is “patriarchy,” which is, of course, ironic given that the vast majority of these Occutards are Oblameo* zombies and he’s the ultimate patriarch figure. As in Uncle Joe and Uncle Mao.
* I love this version of his name. Combines two of his most apt descriptions:
Report Post »Ob-LAME-O and o-BLAME-o.
Amarath01
Posted on June 19, 2012 at 7:14amIf there is one thing i feel is against my moral guidance its prostitution (sale of love/ sex/ w/e), however, their argument is correct. If i own the right to my body, if i have the freedom to engage in trade of services and goods, then i have the right to prostitute. And do not be mislead, banning prostitution outright only hurts everyone involved including society as it is one of the natural and universal developments of humankind, i would argue of a negative nature.
Report Post »But the base agreement presented here is correct and we should look at it realistically as it has real world impact and effect of force.
Open Mind
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 5:36pmCalifornia has become the cesspool of the country and Oakland/San Francisco are the turd in the cesspool.
Report Post »Athinkerinaseaoflibs
Posted on June 19, 2012 at 8:14amPlease! Whoever is in charge send in the people in white coats to collect up these anarchists/vermin and place them in solitary captivity. Not as punishment but as quarantine to keep them from spreading the insanity. Very few sins are even close to the evil of those who advocate the theft of innocence. Has the whole world gone insane?
Report Post »BlessedONE333
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 5:35pmliberals will pay you to host illegals
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/vol/3085848071.html
Report Post »lqtm
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 5:18pmhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LlCtUh1a-Hw#!
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 5:44pmThese are your allies aren’t they JZS? The ones you defend so energetically….
Report Post »bumfuzeled
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 5:10pmThey can only get away with this crap in liberal cities. In the rest of the real world we don’t stand for this method of disagreement. When you vandalize or attempt to over power people physically, we fight back. I remember as a teen purposefully crossing picket lines set up to block traffic or workers from reaching a plant or store. I still take pleasure today in crossing them when I see them. Where are our unemployed youths? You should be out there harassing the harassers, its great fun.
Report Post »capitalismrocks
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 5:10pmI see…. So kidnapping woman, raping them on route to prepare them mentally and physically to accept that they are just pieces of meat to be used and abused and then sold into underground market white slavery rings, small children kidnapped and sold to covert pedophile pleasure palaces and just the whole exploitation of woman…. apparently that is a-okay with Occupy…. boy Obama and the liberals do keep some interesting company don’t they.
Report Post »levarforever
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 5:04pmAnarchists are like all Leftist groups; they take a legitimate victim’s rights issue and try to adopt it as if it was their own idea and suggest that the only reason would Conservatives be concerned is because on an ulterior motive. They’ve created a straw man argument, completely ignoring the epidemic of sex trafficking, which not only affects children, but the women who are kidnapped by traffickers. These women are forced to be prostitutes by organized crime syndicates and pimps, not Capitalism. Trying to rescue people from modern-day slavery has nothing to do with moral views on sex. But while we’re on that note, if prostitution is by consent and legal, that still doesn’t make it right. Infidelity isn’t against the law, but no one is going to say it’s right, especially if it happens to them. Likewise, if someone’s daughter, sister, or mother was a legal prostitute, I doubt that any sane person would accept that either. And by the way, it’s not liberating or empowering for women. Prostitution is not so you can become more philosophically enlightened. Let’s just put it that way.
Report Post »possom
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:59pmIf they dislike capitalism so much why don‘t they walk their little commie butt’s right across the mexican border and go down south and live with Chavez for awhile? I‘m sure he’ll welcome them with open arm’s.
Report Post »Kerri g
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:56pmAnd just what does the exploytation of children have to do with these people? That just goes to show what kind of people they are. Hijack a conference on the problem of child exploytation and sex trafficing for their own agenda. Even the rape of little children don’t matter to them. FYI people, trafficing referrs to people who don’t want to be whores but are forced to be. If that does not apply to you then go away.
Report Post »kent grotz
Posted on June 19, 2012 at 2:49pmI wanted to say something but didn’t know just what. You said it well. I don’t know where those people keep their brains, apparently not in their heads.
Report Post »jmoorhouse
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:55pmGod help us all.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:50pmAnd yet with the Occupy groups, not one womens rights band of radicals will speak out against them; they only continue to claim a ‘war on women’ from the Conservatives. This is beyond reproach and all levels of reprehensible behaviour. I hope someone in the law is watching them, and if any laws are broken, sweep the guilty up once and for all.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 5:00pmI agree .. where are the women to stand up to OWS … not the liberal women that is for certain .. so they condone the exploitation of women? Well I am shocked … NOT .. here is a group of REAL women who want better for all women and children (and men also) …
http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=147108402091862&id=100000889629676#!/ConservativeWomen
Report Post »burnteye86
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 5:12pmThe OWS movement is demonic in nature anyway, so why would they be against sex trafficking?
Report Post »seljo1701a
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 5:18pmAnd on top of that, these idiodic ppl claim that Conservatives “want to get into ppls bedrooms and dictate what goes on there.”
This campaign, named “Bedsider” keeps playing “PSA’s” on my local talk radio station that has Limbaugh and Hannity, etc. The spot is ridiculously gratuitous in the lyrics, though humorous, if it wasn’t so sad. Here is the flagship of the gov “going into ppl’s bedrooms,” and it ain’t Conservatives doing it.
http://www.multivu.com/mnr/53114-ad-council-tnc-bedsider-org-unplanned-pregnancy-tools-advice-english
The gist of the PSA jingle is some one talking about all the weird places they’ve done “it,“ followed by a narrator saying ”you haven’t given up on sex, don’t give up on birth control. Visit Bedsider.org for tips.”
Amazing, and, frankly, the ad is offensive to me. I don’t expect stuff like this in a commercial. I don’t listen to contemporary music radio stations with my kids in the car to avoid stuff like this…
Report Post »Dismayed Veteran
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:43pmI was in college when the original “Day of Rage” took place. While I thought the participants were criminals, at least they made some sense. OWS are simply stoned out idiots.
Report Post »John in Connecticut
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:41pmI don‘t understand why these knuckleheads weren’t getting their butts kicked. Back in the 60′s when I was in the navy, a bunch of protesters gathered outside gate 4 at the Naval Base in Newport. A bunch of sailors off the ships waded into them and tore them up. It was freaking exhilirating.
Report Post »Sargon_Starblade
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:37pmI have to agree with INDIVIDUALISM. If a woman has a product (her body) and she wishes to rent it (rent is a better word than sell because 1. she keeps ownership, 2. she expects it not to be damaged upon return), it is none of the governments business. Yes it is immoral from a few religious stand point, but it is not governments place to institute morals. That is the job of family and religion.
I am a Christian by the way I just look at things logically. We fight all the time about government imposing their moral views on us; gun laws, the word God in public and welfare just to name a few. So then why do we insist that they impose our morals on others when it comes to prostitution?
Report Post »Sargon_Starblade
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:42pmI do however feel that they should be of age.
Report Post »ColoradoNative
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 7:08pmWow Sargon, way to take a stand for light. You think government should be involved in matters of morality, and not Christians? I guess abortion is also okay with you since it‘s a moral issue and it is the woman’s body. Government says it’s okay so we Christians should go along with it? No! We are called to be light to help those in need. To use our system of elections to elect those that agree with us on matters of morality.
FYI – this is nothing about a women “renting” her body for sex. This is about women (usually) being kidnapped, or deceived into a job opportunity, and then being forced in the sex trade against their will. This is a huge world wide problem and as a Christian it should make you sick and want to do something about it.
Educate yourself – this is the website of the group that these occupy idiot protested.
Report Post »http://www.heat-watch.org/human_trafficking/
mtcountrygrl
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 7:26pmWhile I see no difference between women who get paid for sex and the ones down at the bar giving it away. I will say this…the reason I am glad it is illegal is…I do not want a prostitution house next door to a school or my house! And I am tired of paying for peoples treatments for STDs and such. Keep your pants on, or pick up the tab for your choices.
Report Post »HollyW
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:37pmLast summer the Daily Rash reported that Occupy Wall Street was using prostitutes to deter rapists at their demonstration sites. http://www.thedailyrash.com/occupy-wall-street-hires-prostitutes-to-combat-rising-rape-allegations
Report Post »mienna1
Posted on June 19, 2012 at 6:37amHolly- I don’t have anything negative to say about your comment, per ce- but I just can‘t resist saying that the newspaper’s name is the DAILY RASH? *thrws hands up in the air* I think that says it all right there, lol. <3
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:35pmNo big surprise – like all liberals, obama’s paid OCCUPIERS are anarchists who have no morals and no sense of decency – children exist solely to be exploited, before they are born, as well as after; This is the diseased liberal mind at work – this is the future of America under ‘BHO 2.0.’.
Report Post »HorseCrazy
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 7:29pmbingo couldn’t agree more these disgusting backwards people belong in the mental hospital instead of occupying the streets
Report Post »TraceyM
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:21pmThese people are so out of touch it’s not even funny .
Report Post »The Gooch
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:47pmAnyone else picking up on the message these nihilists really don’t care how children are used and abused? “IT’S ALL ABOUT ME!!!”
Report Post »I don’t care what two (or more) consenting adults do in private. I do care what happens to children. I suppose that makes me a pig. Oink. Oink.
This is a fringe group within a fringe movement. Have fun dealing with your brethren, lefties. Oh, and keep an eye on your children.
wdittgasn
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:49pmThey deserve to have their heads bashed in….. And I would do it, if jokers like that got in my face with their stupid horns I would put some road rage on them even though we would not be on the road….. I would beat the F out of them…… I mean that is my first impulse when viewing these idiots!
Report Post »The Gooch
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 5:09pmStupidity can often be very funny. When your message amounts to saying you believe in engaging others with thug speak and shutting down discourse, that is both stupid and funny. Nihilists and leftists LOVE free speech… except when they’re expected to allow it to others. Once again, stupid and funny.
Report Post »Thanks to the wilting violet who reported my previous post in this thread. I did not swear, threaten or even advocate for the rape of children. Actually, I’m very much against the latter. Keep up the good work. My apologies for pointing out the obvious and the sin of levity.
Laken
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:21pmAs long as Eric Holder is Attorney General…we are NOT a nation of laws…
IMPEACH Holder..P e t i t i o n
http://action.freedomworks.org/6851/tell-congress-to-investigate-eric-holder/?source=AWEHT2&gclid=CPr8i_zmzbACFcVk7AodlRQ0Wg
Report Post »Wildblue3
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:20pmSomeone needs to stand up to these moralless brats!!
Report Post »TheBurningTruth
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:20pmDon’t forget! Obama, Pigloski and Reid have ENDORSED the OWS movement and NEVER retracted that endorsement. The Unholy Trinity supports OWS and everything they do as they‘ve never said one negative thing about ANY of OWS’ activities. I suppose that isn’t too surprising considering that the Progressive Liberals attack religion and morals at every chance.
Remember that come November.
Report Post »SmokeyBehr
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:19pmIt is so incredible, the amount of cognitive dissonance inside the heads of the Occupy types. Everything is a conspiracy to them and against them, even if the conspiracy is *for* them, AND the betterment of society. The Occupiers don’t want any form of government besides a Kleptocracy, and they want to be the Kleptocrats. At least with Anarchy, there’s a chance for some sort of civilization to emerge.
Report Post »truthseekerusa
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:18pmWho will these Occupyers come running to when the sexually related diseases that they have been sharing takes over their bodies?
Maybe they behave this way because of the effect of syphilis on their brains has already taken over their ability to think rationally.
Report Post »Its Gonna Getcha
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:13pmThis is not a political stance. This is a place for the mentally ill to feel at home.
Report Post »gooeylewie
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:11pmsee, first homosexuality.
Then pedophilia, necrophilia, and bestiality.
Sorry, once you untether society from morality, there is no end to depravity.
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:11pmas long as its not against their will its fine.
Report Post »tzion
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:25pmOne must first have a will. Age of consent laws may be somewhat arbitrary but they are much better than the alternative. Or are you proposing we let 6-year-olds vote? The issue here isn’t about adults selling themselves into sex slavery, it’s about adults selling children into sex slavery.
Report Post »shimauma
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:37pmso those 10-13 year olds are ok with being drafted into the sex trade? You are one sick puppy.
Report Post »The Gooch
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:54pmYou need to define “its” (sic) and “their.”
Report Post »Surely you are not advocating for the legalization of pedophillia.