Does This Atlanta Private Investigator’s Lie Detector Prove Cain Is Telling the Truth?
- Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:09am by
Liz Klimas
- Print »
- Email »
Herman Cain has already said he would take a polygraph test to prove he is being truthful in his denial of recent accusations of sexual assault that four women made against him.
The polygraph test has not been taken yet, but one man says he already has proof that Cain is telling the truth.
The local CBS affiliate reports private investigator TJ Ward and his $15,000 voice analyzing software detect stress levels and other metrics from a person’s voice to tell if they are lying or not. Ward used the software to analyze Cain’s recent press conference and said it shows he was telling the truth:
During the speech, when Cain denied the claims, the lie detector read “low risk.” According to Ward, that means Cain is telling the truth.
During the section of Bialek’s news conference where she says, “He suddenly reached over put his hand on my leg under my skirt and reached for my genitals he also grabbed my head brought it towards his crotch.”
During the analysis of that section the software said “high risk statement.” Ward said that means she is not telling the truth about what happened.
“I don’t think she is fabricating her meetings,” said Ward. ”But, she is fabricating what transpired.”
[...]
“When he directly talks about the allegations against him there is no high risk,” said Ward. “It is low risk, which tells me he is being truthful in his conversations to the public.”
You can watch the machine in action below:
Ward told CBS that law enforcement already use software such as this and that it has a 95 percent success rate.
[H/T The Right Scoop]
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 689 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 658 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 524 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 361 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 322 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 202 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 221 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- ‘Imperial President’: President Obama Issues Another Major Executive Order Read More
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 202 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (470)
AzSage
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:12amI didn’t need the results of the lie detector to know he was telling the truth.
People need to realize and understand that this is a total sham being perpetrated by the Washington puppet masters (repubs and demos alike).
I believe Herman Cain is an honest man with a sincere desire to go to Washington and fix this country, to break down the Washington power structure and get rid of defect spending, waste, corruption and abuse of “power”.
Seems to me that he is the only republican candidate who is telling the truth.
Cain 2012.
Report Post »grayling646
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:44amYou have absolutely no facts to back up your statements. Not everybody is as obviously clairvoyant as you. Most of us need proof. I hope he‘s innocent too but I’m not gonna listen to someone who ‘knows everything’ and doesn’t have one shred of evidence to back it up.
Rajabear1
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:44amAgreed, couldn’t say it better myself.
Report Post »I.Gaspar
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:58amThis woman scores a perfect “ten” on the lying skank meter.
Report Post »Anyone who doesn’t see it is a fool.
Cain 2012…still the best choice.
amagaux
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:02amThey ought to turn this gadget loose on Obama. He lies all the time…………and Holder as well.
Report Post »WOW, just think about it. If the truth-o-meter could be at the bottom of the screen when these gus are shoving it to us………unbelievable.
mikem1969
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:06amYou saind it azsage, When the lady was reading from a script with gorila allred on TV that proved it. I’m sorry, if something like that were to have actually happened, it would have burned itself in her mind and she would not have needed a script to say it. Not to mention that they all have ties to the obahitlerstalinmao administration. They are scared to death of Cain because he bucks the only ammo they have ever had to get themselves elected.
Report Post »pamela kay
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:13amI agree for the most part. If the remaining GOP candidates don’t step forward and defend this man it will show their true character. This should be used in ads for the GOP exposing the progressive propaganda to America. Those responsible should face charges.
Report Post »Pontiac
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:19am@amagaux
“They ought to turn this gadget loose on Obama.”
It’ll catch fire…
JoeInMaine
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:26amGRAYLING646 wrote: “You have absolutely no facts to back up your statements….Most of us need proof. I hope he‘s innocent too but I’m not gonna listen to someone who ‘knows everything’ and doesn’t have one shred of evidence to back it up.”
And yet you seem all-too willing to convict Herman Cain without ONE single fact to back YOU up? Can you prove Herman Cain is lying? Or are you “convinced” he‘s guilty because you’re being told over and over and over by people with a vested interest in destroying his political career? Maybe it‘s just that you feel more strongly about another candidate you support and you see the opportunity to kick a good man when he’s down? Why do you like to kick animals? Why do you abuse little puppies? See? I can make accusations with no proof too!
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:27amHere’s some ketchup. You’re gonna need it when you eat those words.
Report Post »Miguelito
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:28amLet’s get this analysis out so the liberal, dems, etc. will attack this guy. The true shall set you free. Beware of what seeds sow! I believe Cain! I have seen evil and it’s not Mr. Cain. The otherside is a different story!
Report Post »hikinggussie
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:29amI agree with you!
Report Post »1casawizard
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:34amI got ya back on your comments about Cain. What scares me is the reluctance of people to believe the women are lying. It dosen’t matter if there four or four hundred women. If they are lying, case closed and let’s get on to the issues. This is a smoke screen to place him in a negative light next November. He may need to do something BIG in a positive way to erase that. Peoples minds are short. He needs to get this out of his way.
Report Post »Amma K
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:47amWhat is really sad is that if this woman is indeed lying or embellishing she has done so much damage to the women that are truly harassed! For me I believe that she is not being totally truthful. Just my feelings – no facts on either side.
Report Post »MR_ANDERSON
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:51amMy success as a human lie detector still stands. If you want to verify it, look at the posts I’ve made as this story progressed.
I seem like I’m tooting my own horn, but really everyone can learn to do it, even you! When you base your life in the truth every moment of each day, it is much easier to notice something that is different. It is like finding the one instrument in the symphony orchestra that is out of tune.
I just wish I didn‘t have the moral problem of taking other people’s money, because I am so very good at Texas Hold’em.
Report Post »JohnHW
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:54amI also believe Cain is telling the truth, either that or he has been trained to not give off the body language lying indicators – and I have not seen or heard of any such training. Normal people do not get this training.
I learned to recognize this while a court reporter and had about 95% correct rate. I only heard his accuser (Sharon), so don’t have an opinion of her statements.
BTW: I don’t support Cain for other reasons, but if he does win the nomination, I will support him. Currently, I support Newt and do believe he is what is needed in the WH. Someone who will stand his ground, but will discuss the issues with the Dems and bring them to his side. I believe he can be another Reagan if given the chance.
Report Post »On The Bayou
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:57amBy-a-lick should be jailed for making false statements to the American public, along with Gloria please someone touch my genitals Allred. The Black should now come out and demand justice for Herman Cain.
Annika2011
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:58amAgree with the truth machine software.
Report Post »Cain does seem to be a very honest man.
Obama got elected to the State Senate with these types of dirty tricks.
2 of the “ladies” already have a connection to Obama.
And why was his accuser giggling and smiling so much, standing next to Allred?
Just saying.
David11
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:00amIt amazes me that people complain every single day about people in Gov‘t or just Gov’t in general because they’re just dishonest to the American People. It never fails though that when voters like a candidate they refuse to listen or believe accusations or even facts sometimes, but rather believe the candidate..yes the same TYPE of person that we all accuse of screwing over the American People. Will people ever grow a brain and realize that they’re being duped over and over and over again? What will it take for people who complain all the time realize that the people they like or admire are probably lying to them? I mean its not like it doesn’t happen as it happens everyday, so is it just because a candidate has a great speech writer who can come up with good lines that gets your attention? Is it because the research team for the candidate can dig and find relavent information and then uses it to talk a good talk? Why on earth do people continue to believe anything any of the people say? Besides the candidate Paul who frankly really does have a track record of consistantly, but really isn’t a contender who else up on stage including Cain has a good track record with actions? Nobody!! So, why oh why do people continue to get all worked up as if a candidate is the MAN because of something he/she said in a debate? You do know that they pay people to come up with pretty much everything they say, right? 4 Women made accusations which need to be looked into, no free pass 4 ca
Report Post »jzs
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:15amWhich statements were true? The ones where he said he didn’t know about the settlements with the two women, or the ones where he said he did know about the settlements with the two women?
Report Post »weaverjw
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:17amI noticed the software allows the user to tell if it is a male or female being analyzed. Male was selected when Herman was speaking and also when Sharon was speaking.
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:23amIt’s interesting how they can tolerate J.Carter a total unknown, and an idiot, and B.J.Clinton, also virtually unknown. Both liars of incredible ability. But nothing.
Here a woman comes from 14 years ago and makes claims? Sorry. This is political assassination of character.
Report Post »On The Bayou
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:28amJZS , would you say that Bill Clinton was lucky this technology wasn`t availible while he was President ?
Report Post »ishka4me
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:31amdamage has been done. Anybody remember the Duke Lacross team?
Report Post »ishka4me
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:37amAt first i believed it was similar to Justice thomas, then when 4 or 5 woamen came forward, i became skeptical of mr. Cain. Now i don’t know. If Herman Cain is honest on these incidents( which recent evidence is pointing that way) then this is probably one of the greatest character assignations in our nations’ history. We can dislike someone and do so strongly, but to testify false witness against someone is despicable and you will have to answer to God. Since this is an election, we should demand the truth. If Herman Cain is cleared shortly, he will be our next President.
Report Post »TriforcePlayer
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:40amAgreed Azsage
Report Post »Dagger82
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:44am@AZSAGE
I believe you are right-on with evalualtion of Herman Cain’s motive and ethics, though I also think there are others in the race with like intent. The thing that sets him apart for me is that he is from “outside the beltway”, meaning he hasn’t any loyalties to lobbyists that try to influence his decisions.
IMHO a Cain/Gingrich ticket could actually change the course for our nation while throwing both parties’ Progressive elements into absolute disarray. But, be warned ~ Progressives from both sides will use every disengenuous tactic (no matter how infantile) to retain the current course for reshaping the world to meet their heart’s desire.
We MUST be prepared to defend them and follow their leadership. Liberty demands it!
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:47amThe Obama Campaign did an attacks very similar to this one on Cain to both of Obama senate opponent both for the state seat and the U.S, Senate seat.
Report Post »This is all fabrication and all perpitrated by the Obama camp.
Kalish
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:53amCain should say that he will take a lie detector test IF the accusers do also
Report Post »Hollywood
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 12:03pmReally!!? The ONLY candidate telling the truth? Ron Paul is lying? M. Bachmann, etc. Please supply some PROOF of these assertions, or better yet, please just SHUT UP! You have NO proof,and you know it. So many fools, so little truth!
Report Post »proudinfidel54
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 12:06pmGrayling646, What more proof do you need then a 90+% accurate voice analizer? AMAGAUX, he probably does use this Lie detector on Obama, but only at cocktail parties…lol..He wouldn’t want the Secret Service to come in and smash that expensive software
Report Post »warriorspirit
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 12:10pmI decided to analyze the press conference of Herman Cains 4th accuser. Here is what I saw. The hair and glasses were annoying but I was able to pick up a good deal.
First off her tone is all wrong for recounting past events especially events that should be emotional charged. Her tone is more in line with reading a story.
At:
8:39 full shoulders shrug (a sign of deceit)
8:59 a half shoulder shrug
9:02 a very odd pause and change in her mannerism. She added an unnatural “punch” to the date that seemed out of place (This is something lawyers do to make sure specifics of a statement are remembered)
9:42 again a full shoulder shrug
10:40-10:50 eyes move up and to the left (her right) when giving details of what each was wearing. Eye movement to the left indicates a constructed image vs eyes move to the right when images are from memory. This is for right handed people (It reverses for left handed people) but I know she is right handed because she licks her right fingers to change the pages.
No facial signs of anger or disgust during the reenactment of the events in the car. In fact there were no signs of anger or disgust anywhere in the whole speech (which would be normal when talking about a situation such as this)
13:52-14:20 several shrugs and has an enjoyment expression on her face during the whole ending to her statement. Again no anger or disgust.
I just see too many signs of lying to believe her.
Here is the Video: http://www.youtube.com/wa
Report Post »proudinfidel54
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 12:13pmYep the facts speak for themselves, these women didn’ just wake up 15 years later and say “you know, I’m going to get that Herman Cain for what he did to me”! what are the odds of just one of them to come out that long after the fact, much less four, and then to enlist notbright to represent them. as Kelly Bundy would say “this is no co-inky-dink”
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 12:26pmWhen someone has Gloria the RED as a lawyer, That tells me the lies are REAL!!
Report Post »MandM52
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 12:31pmPerhaps this points to futher proof of Mr. Cain’s innocence…
Report Post »http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2011-11-09.html
Red Meat
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 12:33pmLeave it to the Blaze to conjure up this story. What next, a palm reader insights into Herman Cain’s innocence?
Report Post »TunaBlue
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 12:48pmMust read. Could be the nexus of Cain allegations:
http://nation.foxnews.com/david-axelrod/2011/11/09/coulter-op-ed-david-axelrods-pattern-sexual-misbehavior
Report Post »Worried Grammie
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 12:48pmAZSAGE: I totally agree with you. There has been so much come out about these woman, and add Gloria Alldred to the mix, and you can bet there’s no truth to these allegations.
I agree with Herman Cain seems to be the only honest one in the republication candidates. I even have a problem with Ron Paul and Michelle Bachmann, as they have been in DC quite a while, and all senators and represenatives reportedly have received numerous alerts from various investigations regarding Obama’s ineligibility. If I can’t trust them to expose and investigate Obama, how can I trust them in our White House. Newt has too much baggage, and reportedly attended Bohemian Grove – a big red flag for me. As far as Perry, he attended Bilderberg meeting and is tight with Muslims in TX. Romney is in tight with Wall Street. Huntsman is closely tied to China. I will have to vote for whoever the nominee is, but again it’s voting for the lesser of the evils. I want my country back. I want someone in office who honestly loves this country and not someone wanting to further their political career. What a mess our country is in!!!
Report Post »shackero
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 12:52pmVerry well said———-
Report Post »I don’t trust any of the scrubs that have been in DC for more than 2 years—-All the rest can go home as far as I am concerned. We need ordinary folks to go and fix this country…………..
TaterSalad
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 12:54pmI met Herman Cain today at the Big Sky restaurant in Ypsilanti, Michigan. He was a truely patriotic American with an agenda to bring America back to what the Founding Fathers gave us all.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 1:04pmOn The Bayou, they didn’t have this device then, but they did have ouija boards and those little eight ball things, which were just as good.
These devices have been studied. The results? “The findings generated by this study led to the conclusion that neither the CVSA nor the LVA showed any sensitivity to the presence of deception or stress.”
http://www.texaspolygraph.org/UF_Report_02_30_20061%20Final%20version-1.pdf
Report Post »boltach
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 1:04pmThey did hook Obama up to the machine and the machine broke…
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 1:10pmDagger, and everyone else, I just wanted to point out that Herman Cain ran for Prez in 2000, Senate in 2004, was Bob Doles senior advisor in his 96 run for Prez, so I do not understand everyone thinking that he not a part of the Beltway. I am not completely opposed to Cain, but I am very leary about his tax plan. He may be OK as a VP but I do not see him as a Prez.
Report Post »Mr.Truth
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 1:25pmLOL!! The only one telling the truth? Ahh you may need to go do a little more research on your boy Herman. Hes been caught in quite a few lies.
Report Post »Navy5170
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 1:26pmGRAYLING646; You say you need proof from Cain, yet you let the trollop go on her word. You are beyond hypocritical.
Report Post »rascalofearth
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 1:28pmso innocent that rather than choosing to clear his name with 2 accusers he signed a legal agreement to purchase thier silence. i’m that is exactly how you or i would have handled the situation if someone made such a serious false claim against us.
Report Post »ksibley
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 1:34pmShame on Grayling . . . already you are listening to ‘anything’ and giving it credibility. This is the USA . . . we are all innocent UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. How would you feel if this were aimed at you and YOU HAD TO PROVE YOU WERE TELLING THE TRUTH and that someone else was the liar. I know Herman Cain is telling the truth. Read his books and you will know who he is. Read Obama’s books and you will also know who he is . . . and you should be very afraid.
Report Post »tn.gator
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 1:45pmGRAYLING646, what you seem to forget is that we have a little law here in America that states that we are INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY. How can you say that Cain needs to prove his innocence to YOU? Just who do you think YOU are?
Report Post »sarcoq
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 1:50pmAgreed. You only have to look in his eyes and listen carefully to his voice to know Cain is innocent of charges. You do NOT have to be clairvoyant as Grayling suggests. And as far as “having proof”, remember Santa: When you stop believing, you get underwear!
Cain/Gingrich 2012 = Guys from Georgia
Report Post »Carlinpa
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 1:59pmI agree Azsage. those of us who can hear the subtitles and sound in a voice that is BSing and know that that woman is lying. Her whole presentation is like a carnival show promotion. The tinning in her voice is what gives it away. Herman Cain is honest and is telling the truth!
Report Post »LIBSALWAYSLIE
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 1:59pmMr. Cain is innocent. Why? Because he has not been proven guilty. Thats how our system works.
Report Post »Cain 2012
TheRightWayMan
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 2:00pmWatch the movie Mr. Smith Goes to Washington and it will give you an idea of what Herman Cain will have to go through not only to get there but once he gets in to stay in there, I honestly believe Herman will be our next president and sincerely wish him the best when he gets in, I really hope this country starts to wake up once the idiot we got in there now gets out!!!
Report Post »jdm39
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 2:06pmwe need to use this software on Obama the next time he opens up his mouth.
Report Post »charlieO
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 2:18pmThe same rules apply to your argument with one major difference. You are innocent before “proven” guilty. This is irresponsible reporting and a public that is willing to taint a man by an others wild claims. Based on the timing – be concerned this is a political assassination plain and simple.
Report Post »Susie40
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 3:04pmGrayling
You also have no proof. There are accusations, but so far NO proof. So, does that mean one is guilty until PROVEN innocent?
Report Post »You know the old line…say something often enough, people will believe it regardless….
perfectlyaged
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 3:07pmGloria Allred skins her ignorance back over her head (as my little Grandmother would say) by representing these women who have a pattern of “profiting” by being ignoramuses and demoralizing themselves with these attrocious fabricated lies!!!! Ann Coulter had an excellent article yesterday
Report Post »titled “David Axelrod’s Pattern of Sexual Misbehavior.”
riverdog1
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 3:11pmwhat makes her a skank gaspar? her hair? cause she is a republican?
Report Post »survivorseed
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 3:26pmWell of course it proves his innocence to Blazers. A machine with a squiggly line always trumps the fact that there are 4 statements and at least 2 on the record settlements. Please pick Cain, please pick Cain, he has so many more amusing moments left in him.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 4:06pmWELL said; the CBS Investigator results and ANN COULTER’S expose on AXELROD…see it at
Report Post »http://www.anncoulter.com (Nov. 9 article). Ann is the Rolls Royce of investigative journalists. She has a very important point about the CHICAGO “MAFIA” …the political thugs… I’m glad to see the truth out now, and the fact that PEOPLE believe CAIN and it is NOT going to be…”now that everyone has had their say, get in line behind ROMNEY”… (I’d vote for Romney over Obama…I’d vote for anyone over Obama) but we‘re not going to ’get in line’…It’s going to be CAINS!!! Cain/Newt? Cain/Rubio ? but definitely CAIN!!
Faith1029
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 4:13pmPONTIAC: “@amagaux “They ought to turn this gadget loose on Obama.”
It’ll catch fire…”
I thought your comment was hilarious. Made me laugh.
This story should be all over the news. I hope O’Reilly and the rest get wind of this and put it on their programs.
Report Post »PolitiJim
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 4:48pmThere have been disputes as to the viability of the software. I’ve been investigating and the update on issues whether the software works or not at the top of my post – http://www.politijim.com/2011/11/cain-passes-lie-detector-test.html
Report Post »Lucy Larue
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 5:03pmGRAYLING,
ALL roads lead to Chicago!
Why attack AZSAGE?
Oh wait…,I’ve got it. You’re waiting for C.N.N. or M.S.N.B.C. or perhaps even FOX to do a little INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING. Yeah…,that’ll happen! Why are you content to wait for the “WIZARDS” to tell you? There are no WIZARDS!
Get your learn on…,ON YOUR OWN.
Why do ALLof the accusers have a Chicago connection? Well …,WHY? Yet Herman Cain does not have a Chicago connection. Why Grayling? UGH!
“We have met the enemy and he is us”. POGO
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 6:27pmBeing a Monk, I have had 3 years training in “listening” for the truth. If I can hear and see a person talking I can tell whether or not they are telling the truth. It’s so hard listening to Obama because he lies so much. It‘s easy listening to Glenn because he doesn’t lie. Glenn might have the facts wrong from time to time but, he’s not lying on purpose. Obama and his crew lie on purpose all the time. Holder, Napolitano, Axelrod, Pelosi, Reid, Van Jones, Jarrett and the rest lie with almost every breath. There’s only one type of person that I have a problem with. That’s the person who has absolutely no idea what the truth is and just blindly believes what they are told and repeats it. That person is Joe Biden. I can never tell what he’s saying and I don’t think he knows either.
I’m not a gambling person but, if you talked with my friends you would find out how many bets I’ve won on this. I ask someone to think of a number, write it down and give the paper to a neutral person and then have them tell me that number. They can lie or tell the truth. My job is to tell them if they are telling the truth about that number. I’ve never been wrong in 20 years. The bet is always $1.00 and I’ve made about $100.00 in the last 20 years and have never lost.
Cain is telling the truth. I’ll bet you a dollar on it. Any takers? (Except JZS, I already know he doesn’t have a dollar and Rose Ellen because she prints her own money on her home computer).
Report Post »lilly
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 6:43pmI like Cain..but can he recover..would this be a giant distraction from the obama mess?
Report Post »Heather
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 7:33pm100% agree! =D
Report Post »Fourthhorseman
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:49pmSo much for innocent until proven guilty. You want him to prove he’s innocent, but she needs to prove he’s guilty. Her timing in announcing something that happened so long ago automatically makes her suspect. none of them announced their allegations when he announced he was running—noooooo! They waited until they were scared he was posing a threat to Obama. He’s the Dems worst nightmare: a conservative minority.
Report Post »imahappy123
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:56pmTotally agree with you! It is amazing just how much this is p*sing the left off too. They cannot believe that Americans believe Cain and not these women… LOVE IT!
Report Post »jaylew
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:31pm@JZS you prop up some 2006 study that decries the usefulness or accuracy of using the human voice to measure veracity and truth? Software and computing has made light year jumps since then. I seem to recall when i was in high school that the human population was going to completely obliterate all the land and seas soon…..and that there was a coming ice age. Both “Studies” of course were pure crap..in fact worse…they were totally fabricated lies. Modern voice stress tests are conducted voluntarily in police stations all over the country to allow detectives to make a risk analysis regarding a suspect or witnesses’ veracity. For you to prop that article up in this thread is of no more import at all….these voice tests are used everyday all over the country. I could dig up a number of “studies” that point out how inaccurate 14 year old recollections of alleged sexual harassments are too. But I won’t because they are not needed. We all know what the deal is here…it‘s called character assassination by simply saying something happened that didn’t and or denying something that did happen. It has been occurring as long as politics itself…it’s just that Democrats have turned it into an industry and an institutional area of higher learning. Bill Clinton and his former political machine all have Doctorate Degrees. Barry’s team are still working on their Masters. Unfortunately for them…this time around we proctors have caught them cheating on the test.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:40pmOK, I guess that’s it. Thanks, everybody. No need to go any further with this. Sorry for any inconvenience. Should have known better. Our bad. Go ahead on. . . Oh, wait . . . call coming in . . . Hello. Another one? Ok, thanks . . . I’m back. So, forget that other stuff I wrote up there. I suggest you get Inspector Gadget guy back on the line.
Report Post »imahappy123
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:12pmI totally agree! The puppetmaster is trying to get his way, but the American people won’t have any of it as was displayed in the recent GOP debate! And it is p**sing the left off. HOW WONDERFUL is that?
Report Post »TunaBlue
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:34pmI was still in law enforcement when the first prototypes of this tool went into beta testing, and it was exceedingly accurate. It was a self-contained model, and not computer based. The new models are very accurate. Still, like their polygraph counterparts, are not usually permitted in court proceedings.
I wish I had one, I still have a teenager in the house.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:09pmI’d think anybody, unused to being in the public eye, describing such personal information, would naturally be more stressed than somebody who for years has been speaking over airwaves to the public. Would be interesting to see if this would hold up in a court.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:47pmoh my. Yep. You’re right. Here’s all the evidence you need to send your money, keep the CainTrain chugging: https://antipolygraph.org/blog/?cat=4
Report Post »1389AD
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 12:14amHere again, I don’t need any lie detector results to know that the Herminator is telling the truth and Buy-a-lick is NOT.
Hannity says Buy-a-lick hasn’t ruled out a book deal.
Ya think?
How David Axelrod and the Chicago Machine smeared Herman Cain…with a LOT of help from the MSM and the RINOs!
Does anyone remember how Barack Hussein Obama got elected to the US Senate from Illinois? – Ann Coulter’s gumshoe work and our own research and recollections from when we lived, and voted, in Chicago. Those were the days … NOT!
Report Post »ShotgunB
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 12:40amAxelrods neighbore becomes Gloria’s Ho of the moment- and coming out after 15 YEARS! What a prostitue this woman is; and we already know about Gloria. She is asked the question “Would your client profit from this IN THE FUTURE” and she wouldn’t answer that simple question. Hey, a whore is a whore!!
Report Post »chinable
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 1:05amI HOPE YOU ALL BOOED WHEN THE FEMALE DEBATE MODERATOR ASKED HERMAN CAIN A QUESTION ABOUT RAPE.
Report Post »*Drinks more of the Kool-Aid*
molbersen
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 1:56am@ MIKEM1969
Report Post »I don’t know if this was deliberate or a typo, but calling her “gorila allred” is hysterically funny. Just moving the “l” from gloria to gorila had me laughing harder than I have in quite awhile. Either way, thanks for the great laugh.
waldens1
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 11:02am@grayling646 I’m curious as what proof exactly that YOU have that he is NOT telling the truth? I mean, at this point we have a SHE said HE said andt he only proof we have is an idependent polygraph which shows that he is telling the truth and she is not.
Report Post »neverfinal
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 11:49amI agree, we know Cain is truthful. The only one up there that is. I want a lie detector test on these women and then prosecution for fraud, slander and blackmail. They were paid off and everyone knows it. We the American people need to disconnect from all Media and get the truth and real investigations from the Country loving Citizen Journalist. I demand a complete investigation of all connections that these Gold Digging women have had with the Government Officials and Mobster Union THUGS.
Report Post »OpenRevolt
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 12:43pmThis is what the GOP has imploded into? A desperate hope for a Republican Obama and stories of a voice gadget playing minority report?
How about facts:
9-9-9 plan is 3-3-3 for blacks?
http://www.redstate.com/paulkib/2011/10/14/cain-blows-up-999-plan-with-empowerment-zones/
9-9-9 plan is 9-0-9 or ?-?-? for whoever he feels like?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2011/10/22/cain-dials-back-9-9-9-to-9-0-9/
He is a longtime member of a liberal Reverend Wright style Church with Jesse Jackson and other nutjobs but doesn’t support it?
http://www.fox59.com/news/politics/wxin-herman-cain-the-liberal-church-of-herman-cain-20111018,0,5963417.story
He is pro life except when it comes to actually being pro life?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10/22/cain-stumbling-under-glare-national-spotlight/
==========================================
The Bottom Line:
Cain lies: He was always for the bailout. He supported TARP and claimed the USA would make profits on it. He said you iz ‘ignorant’ if you didn’t agree with him. You’re not a Tea Party Patriot if you support Cain. You’re just a RINO with jungle fever. Hope and Change–that’s your platform.
Cain was also leading the Kansas City Federal Reserve when Billy Boy Clinton was working with the Fed to hand out home loans like an all you can eat buffet for blacks and minorities.
If you know the real Cain it shouldn’t surprise you he is lying his ass off and screwing around with women, b
Report Post »DagneyT
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 2:58pmGrayling, et al, ask yourselves why there was never a hint of impropriety for all the years he was in positions of power in corporate America. It was only during his brief 3 year tenure at the Nat’l Rest. Assoc., a group with powerful ties to SEIU that such allegations were made. That alone should give you pause. Add to that the fact that one of these Chicago women lives in the same building as Axelrod, the same Axelrod who used sexual innuendos to rid odrama of both his opponents in the state and the federal offices he held before becoming POTUS. Don‘t tell me these facts don’t raise some serious questions. If they don’t, you aren’t being honest with yourselves. Herman Cain takes their #1 hammer out of their hands, “if you don’t vote for odrama, you’re a racist”!
Report Post »Jan Conroy
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 8:25pm@ JZS FYI, they did have these machines when Clinton was president — why do you think so many came out to debunk them back then? And your link to the Texas Polygraphers organization? Hey Dude, that‘s the competition and they don’t want to become obsolete and loose out on their big $$$. Duh! Maybe it’s just me, but, I would just love it if the news media was forced to run the little “truth or lie” graphics at the bottom of each and every newscast, interview and political speech — just to keep everyone involved honest.
Report Post »mikesyl
Posted on November 12, 2011 at 12:35pmSee this information related to the technologies used on the Cain analysis:
Subject: Additional Informational Reading: LVA failed as a lie detector in two recent studies
Global Moderator
Report Post »Online
Make-believe science yields make-believe security.
Posts: 4143
The Hague, The NetherlandsU.S. Special Operations Command Buys Into Layered Voice Analysis
Sep 26th, 2007, 5:36am It seems that despite having been forced to terminate its use of the Computer Voice Stress Analyzer (CVSA), a device that by the manufacturer’s own admission “is not capable of lie detection,” U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM), headquartered at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, remains fascinated with the pseudoscience of voice stress analysis. An announcement on FBODaily.com indicates that SOCOM has awarded the Transpire Group of Dulles, Virginia a $145,475 contract for Layered Voice Analysis (LVA)–a bogus lie detection technology brought to us by Nemesysco–the Israeli company that a decade ago marketed the Handy Truster voice lie detector.
Nemesysco’s Layered Voice Analysis utterly failed as a lie detector in two recent studies:Voice Stress Analysis Instrument Evaluation (365 kb PDF). Final Report, Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA) Contract FA 4814-04-0011. By Harry Hollien and James D. Harnsberger. University of Florida, Gainesville. 17 March 2006. “The findings generated by this study led to the conclusion the [sic] neither the CVSA nor the LVA were sensitive to the presence of
Patrick Henry II
Posted on November 12, 2011 at 4:43pmI think I need one of these to install permenantely on my TV. Probably would catch on fire though. lol…
CAIN 2012
Report Post »child of the King
Posted on November 25, 2011 at 11:01pmThis whole sexual harrasment claims that had been brought by these womenagainst Herman Cain seemed a little fishy to me.If these claims were true (only him ,the women ,and God know for sure),why didn’t they bring this stuff out when he announced he was running for president of the United States instead of waiting till he got to the top of the polls and then bring this garbage out.There is just to many red flags gone up in my mind over this story.
Report Post »TWO BITS
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:07amCainiacs are playing with fire. There is a national devasting, sordid scandal playing out as we speak.
Report Post »Each day in this country, brings another exposure of exploitation by politicians, supervisors, clergy, police officers, teachers, and others in positions of authority.
It may be politically expedient to eviscerate Cain’s four accusers(to date) but that will resonate with multiples of women who have been victimized at some point in their lives.
If silence is a virtue, I choose rebellion!
Founding Father2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:11amThere was a shootout yesterday on the Laura Ingraham Show, they basically counted Cain out and then started battling it out over Gingrich and Romney. It is very interesting everything Ann Coulter can bring up from Gingrich’s past: http://www.thedailycandidate.com/video/2011/nov/ingraham_coulter_romney.html
Do you agree?
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:18amThis is just so much distraction and hooey. Wish we only were allowed 3 months for all campaigning. This is just giving the Left and their Lap Dog media more time for Mud Fests and Occupations of Democrat-controlled cities…
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:55amTwo bits…. Rebellion is not what is needed. We need to stand for our convictions, ESPECIAL in the PROGRESSIVE MEDIA that attacks conservatives that are opposed to them. The MEDIA is the one not teaching the truth about the Occupy Movement (besides Glenn and The Blaze). The MEDIA is the one ATTACKING CAIN and SUPPORTING ROMNEY.
The MEDIA is PROGRESSIVE, so is CARL ROVE… so is ROMNEY. Voting for Romney would be the voting for another four years of Bush and Obama. The war needs to be fought but not in the traditional “rebellion”. We need to stop watching the news, save from places like The Blaze and GBTV. We need to DESTROY the PROGRESSIVE MEDIA MACHINE! Stop tuning them in and the advertising on them will stop. Demand a fairer approach to the distribution of information. Standards of ethics are needed in the media, otherwise they are no better than a tabloid.
This topic is relevant to the cause of true INDEPENDENCE FROM the PROGRESSIVE JUGGERNAUT.
Report Post »Rajabear1
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:03amI have been ‘victimized’ and I’m telling you, there are serious flaws with this entire hit. It is resonating with me alright. It once again debases women and men who have actual encounters of this nature. Please do yourself a favor and step back and really look. The NRA should have never settled to save time and money. They, and other companies like them, potentially ruin lives by being expedient. Look at the information coming out of the woodwork concerning these women and the different situations and their patterns. The establishment KNEW the settlements were in his past and thought the electorate would back away immediately with nothing further. Well, like you. Now their fatal flaw was pushing ‘putting a face’ on the ‘victims’ with that joke of a woman. Low and behold, we wait with an open mind for the truth, whatever it may be, and it is pouring out. I refuse to let the media and the elite pick who runs against obama or this country. It ends now. We are out of time. I suggest you remove your MSM glasses and start looking at facts. I don‘t know the truth yet and I don’t know who I want as a candidate, but I do know I will not let any of them play the same game with mine and my kids lives anymore.
Report Post »Max jones
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:26amMIDKNIGHT…..sure we could stop watching, but that won.t accomplish anything. You are still looking at these events and people as if these were common events and people…they most certainly are NOT! In my POV, this is a true battle for the blood of the common man. Karl Rove is a prog as deeply as axlerod or nancy pelosi. George bush is progressive as anyone in washington is.
Report Post »The 2012 election has been in the works for a hundred years, just as surely as obama’s presidency.
the ONLY real issue that gets my attention is the diabolical nature of the progressive agenda. When you have to lie and cheat to get what you think you need there can be no moral ‘high ground’. Obama can’t win another term without lying and cheating
The democrats are relying on the ignorance and licentiousnes and envy of their base to pull this off.Mainly ignorance. The demo base Is the“occupiers”. Plain and simple.
Jus-sayin
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 12:29pmI‘d like this guy to test his system on any of Obama’s statements – My belief is the needle would peg every time.
Report Post »Susie40
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 3:15pmIn other words, you will believe ANY accusation of misconduct because misconduct occurs somewhere some of the time.
Report Post »Sounds sound. NOT
JohnnyMidknight
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 5:42pm@ Max jones I completely agree with you. I am just commenting that rebellion generally suggests violence. If we do that, we lose. The Progressive need to be the first to engage in violence. We simply must be aware of what is truth and educate ourselves. We need to stand for what is right. There are minor things we can all disagree on, but not the Constitution and not the Free Market (as these are the two things that need to be upheld in their purest forms).
Report Post »libh8er
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:58amCain has an unusual speaking voice. He has to slowly form the words in order for the rest of us to understand them. I wonder if that would throw that machine off.
Report Post »offsir13
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:16amIn your eyes he’s guilty no matter what! Your a racist! Prove that your not! Get it?
Report Post »bulldawg
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:18amI really don’t care why he slows his speech, until someone brings forth evidence instead of Gloria the liberal side show Aldred, Cain is innocent until proven guilty, that’s the way are justice system works. If you read something other than the blaze, the two bimbo’s who have come forward have more skeletons in their closet than Joe Bite-Me, well that might not be the case but the bottom line is the communist society in America is scared to death of Cain and they will do anything to keep Barry the Marxist in place. The real Americans of this country had better get busy and work together to rid this country of the communist takeover in progress because we have just one chance to take back the USA.
Report Post »selfgov1st
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:34amThen explain why the voice recognition software also shows that the accuser is lying. Does she talk weird too?
Report Post »Harry Assenback
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:46amDo you really think we should act like the Democrats and call people Racist just because they don’t agree. Personally, I‘m sick of being called a Racist if I don’t agree with Obama. I disagree with everything that comes out of Nancy Pelosi’s head which is the same as Obama but no one calls me a Racist for disagreeing with her………..hmmmm.
Report Post »Fly on the Wall
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:57amCain is used to public speaking since he does that for a living, so he’s smooth and practiced. Bailek is not used to the limelight and and pressure of being before reporters and cameras. I’d think that would add to her stress level. I’ll wait for the real evidence on both sides rather than base guilt or innocence on voice stress.
Report Post »selfgov1st
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:25am@Flyonthewall
I think unless the victims can actually provide a shred of credible evidence, we need to treat this as a non-story.
second, regarding the stress levels…her elevated stress levels should be compared to her own baseline stress level (from other parts of her speech) and I’m assuming that was done in this analysis. The point is that her stress level peaked at certain points. We have as much reason to believe this gentleman as we do to believe the accuser.
This isn’t hard & fast evidence, but it is a heck of a lot better than anything else we’ve seen on the side of the accusers. Whether you want Cain to win or not (he’s not my first choice…though I think he’s in the top half of the R-Candidates), it would be a shame for him to lose BECAUSE of these allegations unless they have a shred of backup, which has not yet been presented. The AP sourcing anonymous sources and anonymous friends of anonymous sources is not evidence in the least. This woman, represented by a known Democratic hit-(wo)man lawyer, while she smiles the whole time is not evidence. Yes, lets not pass judgement without evidence. Since we have none, nobody should refrain from voting for Cain, nor should anyone vote for Cain due to these allegations. If you change your vote due to this, you have pronounced judgement…that said, there is a lot of time for any evidence to present itself in time for the election
Report Post »Fly on the Wall
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:42amSELFGOV1ST…I agree with you. We need solid evidence one way or another. To go with something like this “lie detector” test that wouldn’t even be accurate enough to use in a court of law…especially when it was done in this manner…is no real evidence. So many here have claimed it‘s definitive proof and that’s troublesome. I’m with you that I want something more before deciding how I feel about the charges. If these women have a case, then Mr. Cain needs to be held responsible for his claims of innocence. And if Mr. Cain is innocent then the women who are making false claims also need to be held responsible. But let’s wait for the true evidence.
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:19am@OFFSIR13.. WOW !!! You’re doing exactly what the left does. Throw the race card out there if you disagree.. I bet you can’t STAND it when they do it , but there you are.. calling this guy a racist for forming his own opinion.. What a joke..
Report Post »SimpleTruths
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:20am@OFFSIR13
Report Post »So in your line of thinking any time I consider whether a black man or woman is guilty of something that makes me a racist? Really? No, really?
idontgetit
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:32amOFFSIR13: “In your eyes he’s guilty no matter what! Your a racist! Prove that your not! Get it?”
GET IT? I’m not sure, but it seems like OFFSIR13 is making a baseless accusation that really can’t be proven or dis-proven…
Report Post »Wu Ming Ren
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 1:43pmOFFSIR13 said, “Get it?” meaning that he was making an example of what happens with baseless charges such as calling someone a racist. The person so charge has a difficult time establishing that he is not a racist. He could as easily have asked, “Have you stopped beating your wife?“ and followed with ”Get it?”
Get it?
Report Post »jaylew
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:52pmYeah like they don’t work with slow speaking black people….cripes i swear your comment just made me sigh with complete stupidness. Herman Cain speaks with an eloquence and elegance that most of us on this forum would love to be able to do. He has a slight southern drawl to his word inflections indeed but that is geographic upbringing…it has nothing to do with the color or size of his lips. Why did you ask that question? It just simply gives the liberal trolls here something to take back to their little cubby holes and gloat over all night. Like I said in a previous thread….I am not gay but when I see Herman Cain I think heater hose from a 57 Chevy. I want a president with a big one. My vote this election cycle is going to the Republican with the biggest penis. If there are going to be racially motivated stereotype comments on this Herman Cain story…I am going to bring out the big guns. Yep i said it…i want a president with a huge giant overwhelming presence…if you‘re pickin’ up what i’m laying down. And to you liberals out there who are disturbed by that comment….you can have your distinguishing characteristic former President Pantload all to yourselves. I have Cain envy. So What?
Report Post »TunaBlue
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:52pmThis software is first calibrated to measure a variety of normal at rest patterns in the voice. After the calibration, the software measure patterns to identify stress patterns that identify when someone is lying.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:19pmSELFGOV1ST, it didn’t “show she was lying,” if it was even accurate, it showed she was more stressed than the man who has made a career of speaking to the public..
Report Post »Carter John
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:55amIf you know the signs of a person lying(their tell) you don’t need one of those things. However, the problem then is that there is no hard proof. Look at Nancy’s press conferences, when she does a lot of hand motions is one of the ways she can be using a tell. However, she can be using it as emphasis for a point. But, yet again over emphasis is also a tell.
Report Post »Fly on the Wall
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:44amIn other words, the “tell” might tell you nothing? ;-)
Report Post »Carter John
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 3:39pmI’m not a professional profiler. However, anyone with any sense knows that Nancy is fount of flowing lies.
Report Post »Johhny1971
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:53amThere you have it! Solid scientific evidence that is indisputable. If you deny this, you are a flat-earther. The debate is over. Let’s move on.
Report Post »timeout
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:01amwe are supposed to believe this guy? over the mics, background noise? bullbleep! lets put him on the candidates so we can see who is lying….this technology should be able go past all the smooth talk, be it from the politicians or the socalled non politicians….what a crock.
i have some snowballs made in hell for ya, cheap!
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:13amHuh? Let’s discuss Obamavilles….
Report Post »marvlus
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:48amIf I had to place my bets, I would say this has all been setup by someone with ties to the Democratic party to disrupt attention to the process of the nomination of the GOP contender. Unfortunately, this would be a difficult thing to prove.
Report Post »OneTermPresident
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:59amThe Restaurant Association has ties to a union named SEIU. The former head Andy Stern now works for Obama.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:15amTrue ? Andy Stern ? SEIU ? BINGO…..
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:51amSheila O’Grady, Illinois Restaurant Association->Axelrod->Obama
Report Post »Fly on the Wall
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:59amSo you’re saying Cain also has ties to SEIU? Interesting.
Report Post »Max jones
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:05amAndy Stern is very close to the potus. And their future is intertwined. We all know that the progs will do ANYTHING to retain the white house. There is no moral directive contained in the progressive agenda.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:17amFLY: No, guess this is getting too complicated for your attention span ( forgive me, the arrogance of the Left is rubbing off on me ) Cain is associated with the NRA not SEIU…..
Report Post »CatB
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:21amAxelrod also .. has ties to the accusers…..
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=47438
I think it was “leaked” from the left to the right … ..
TEA!
Cain 2012
Report Post »Fly on the Wall
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:25amSorry Barber2, I thought Cain worked for the National Restaurant Association…is that not connected to the Restaurant Association?
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 4:53pmFLY: I’ll try this again . Cain had ties to the NRA ( restaurant group) wherein the Bialek incident occurred . Andy Stern has ties to both NRA and SEIU which is the group that contributed the most campaign funds to Obama in 2008. This, Stern would have access to both groups for info and “investigation” and, thus, the Obama connection. They are great buds. ( and I am positive that the Obama administration has a zillion “dirt” regulators turning over every rock and searching every file of their potential opponents. The Far Left is to political tactics what J. Edgar was to the FBI…)
Report Post »momrules
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:48amI have read that a psychopath can pass a lie detector test. Obama would pass.
Report Post »GodHatesFigs
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:58amAnyone can pass a lie detector test. Also, innocent can people can fail them. They are not very reliable.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:15amThis is not a polygraph. Besides, neither Cain nor Bailek are psychopaths. The stress analyzer measures “minitremors” and it is used in high-level stress impromptu speech. It’s just one more tool. If you don‘t want to believe the machine look at the accuser’s body language. Bailek’s was very telling. That alone should have made it obvious that she was lying. Geez, people. Use your brain, please.
Report Post »momrules
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:28am@ Kryotonite….Sheesh, It was just a comment about Obama and his ability to lie with a straight face. I personally believe Mr. Cain is telling the truth and as time goes on these women will be outed for the liars they are.
Report Post »GodHatesFigs
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:09amI‘m a little embarrassed I didn’t read the whole article and assumed it was a polygraph. That being said, “voice stress analysis” is just as unreliable as a polygraph. If Cain did what he is accused of, that is horrible, and he is unqualified to be any kind of leader. If he didn’t, he is still unqualified for president. He didn’t know the Chinese already had nuclear capabilities and he thinks it is not necessary to know who the leaders are of countries in the mid east, a pretty strategic place at the moment. This man is simply on a publicity tour so he can sell more Herman Cain.
Report Post »GodHatesFigs
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:19amAlso, body language analysis is in the same camp.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 12:17pm@MOMRULES
My bad. :)
@GODHATESFIGS
Also, body language analysis is in the same camp.
——–
Foreign policy competence and character assassination are two different topics. He didn’t know about China, and so do many other businesspeople. Obum didn’t even know how many states there are in the Union. In any case, the important thing would be his world vision and who he chose as advisors.
On body language you are wrong. If you work in intel you learn to read body language. It is VERY telling. Now, if you are judging by that phony who appears on O’Reilly, well, I wouldn’t trust her either.
Report Post »VRW Conspirator
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 12:46pmGuys…it doesn’t matter if they are lying or now…
THIS isn’t about Cain or the accusers lying….the first two ladies simply filed suits based on a stray off color joke or gesture or comment Cain made that made them feel uncomfortable. One was over Cain saying she was a pretty little thing like his wife and motioning with his hand that she was only up to his shoulder…the lady took it to be a sexual gesture… Cain already explained that one and that lady disappeared…amazingly!..
These latest two are the real attack…the first two are falling back into the closet they came from…
But it doesn’t matter that in a month or two or 6 Cain will be proven right and these women liars… it is “he said, she said” and can’t be proven… it is just to put DOUBT!!!… It is to orchestrate the election towards the goal the DNC and the RNC want…. they both want Cain and Newt GONE!!! this was supposed to be a Romney, Perry ticket…they thought Palin would get in and cause a big uproar… painting the GOP as scared white rich racists “clinging to their guns and religion” against anybody different….well Palin didn’t play the game…
so now…POOF… Cain is the enemy..the nut…the wacko…the black man that hates blacks…the Tea Party nutter who wants to destroy every social program and slash the budget…
look behind the curtain…think..watch…observe..record…but THINK!!!!
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:46amThe Left has targeted every serious Republican candidate. We are witnessing an Al Capone / mob styled St. Valentine’s Day Political massacre . Difference ? The Democrats go after the candidates one at a time, target them relentlessly in the Lap Dog media such as the New York Times , and then assassinate the character of each. I have never witnessed such under-handed, un American, sleazy campaign tactics. Guess that’s what happens when Saul Alinsky is the inspiration for your campaign strategy. Uniting Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” with the strong-armed bullying of the unions ( bull-horns, bussed-in mobs, occupations of building, endless chanting of slogans, professionally crafted signs, dues spent on these campaign techniques, co-ordinated Lefty groups working behind he scenes) creates Democrats Campaign 2012. Spread the magic by Occupying Obamavilles in Democrat -controlled cities. Can only imagine what the Left is “organizing” to pull at the polls. More Black Panthers? The Left + Saul Alinsky + the unions = the nastiest election in American history…
Report Post »ThomasBombadillo
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:57amWouldn’t the left/Dems have waited until after he was the Republican nominee before trying to trash him? I think this is coming from his Republican opponents or the RNC, which bothers me even more.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:03amNo. The Left sees Cain as a tremendous threat with the Black vote which they are counting on with Obama. The Left trashes Republicans daily, way before election time. Just read the New York Times…
Report Post »I-HATE-THE-WORD-DISENFRANCHISE
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:05amWell said.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:23amI agree … Cain is the threat — they need to take him out now .. they are waiting for Romney to be the nominee .. then they will go after him!
TEA!
Cain 2012
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:29amTom Bombadill . . . Good point.
Report Post »Fly on the Wall
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:34amIt seems more likely that all this is due to in-fighting within their own party. Karl Rove comes to mind since they seem to be reminiscent of tactics he’s used in previous campaigns. Since there are so many contenders right now it doesn’t seem to make sense that Democrats would use their resources to narrow the field.
Report Post »Rajabear1
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:49amI believe we are seeing the ‘establishment’ flex their muscles. I happen to think that the establishment isn’t right or left, they’re NWO, They must have their chosen candidate to keep up the appearance of left and right to us. Does anyone find it odd that Romney has dumped big bucks into fighting Perry for about 3 weeks or when perry has been at the bottom and Cain had been beating him in all but the New Hampshire polls? Before the ‘scandal’ came out??? It’s almost like Romney campaign was told to not pay any attention to Cain, he wouldn’t be an obstacle or worse, Romneys‘ folks made sure he wouldn’t be an issue. I think they picked Perry a long time ago to be their chosen “Tea Party conservative” candidate with the ultimate goal of having Mitt win. Americans just threw a wrench in their little plan. Once again, they just can’t read the new electorate. Just one of my theories, Lord only knows what they really have in store for us.
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:25am@GODHATESFIGS.. Oh man, Watch it now.. You will be called a leftist troll an obama supporter and a racist with thinking like that. Just ask Barber , he’ll tell you.. Isn’t that right barber ?
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:26amYOUR SENSI: Figured you’d agree with that statement which says something about that statement.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:28pmCain is absolutely no threat because of “black votes.” Democrats love Cain, Perry, Gingrich etc. being in this, for just as LONG as they can. If Cain was chosen as the candidate to challenge Obama, the nation will decide. Obama 2012!!
Report Post »momsense
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:39amSomeone ought to teach Allred and Axelrod to vet their professionally aggrieved better—liars of a feather flock together.
Report Post »NHwinter
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:56amI wish he would start using his lie dectector on Obama, Reid, Holder, and Pelosi. Maybe people would finally start realizing all the lies they tell us everyday.
Report Post »YoungBloodNews
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:38amNope! Im a registered Private Investigator and us in the trade know how faulty these machines are, plus if you were to really hook the Cainster up, he could be coached to beat it with ease (NOT SAYING HE WOULD, I THINK ALL THE ALLEGATIONS ARE BS)
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:05amIt’s sad that you have to say this ((NOT SAYING HE WOULD, I THINK ALL THE ALLEGATIONS ARE BS) in all caps for fear of being attacked on this site by all the Cainians… Sheesh !!
Report Post »RightUnite
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:38amRight, and I’m the Queen of England.
Report Post »Osheal
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:45amYou did not use correct English grammar and punctuation in your comment. Your lack of education is showing!
Report Post »Did you really expect to persuade anyone that you know what you’re talking about?
Roywalling
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 4:27pmIt wouldn‘t do any good to use it on bama when he’s reading from a prompter,because the true emotions aren‘t really there when it’s being read instead of talking from your own mind.
Report Post »BrandyWilson
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:33ami didn’t need this to know the man was telling the truth!
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:32amI didn’t have a lie detector, but my brain told me exactly the same thing. It was absolutely evident by this woman’s voice and demeanor that her allegations were false. She sounded just about as truthful as Obum, which means she lied, lied, and then lied some more.
Report Post »tradexpertbuysell
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:53amAs Soros would say only now the Holy Spirit in last night’s debate and the audiences negative reaction against MSNBC for daring to present rumors as facts I think we are seeing a miracle unfold that GOD is protecting and blessing Cain and lifting him up and the MSM imploding in less than 30 seconds after that senario. Even the follow up question to Romney to slam Cain once Romney saw the audience reaction was savy enough to not take the vultures’ bait from the MSNBC moderators.
Cain you did the right thing beoning the only candidate who went to the Restoring Courage event and Israel and the blessings are lifting you up BIG TIME!
GLORY BE TO GOD THE MOST HIGH.
Report Post »JayDick
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:00amAllred‘s involvement doesn’t add to her credibility, either.
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:09am@tradexpertbuysell.. Sheesh man, you make Cain out to be some sort of prophet sent by the Almighty himself. Get a grip bro he is just another man in a world of many..
Report Post »Max jones
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:58amdemint disciple….i don’t believe that any of the main players in this saga are regular everyday folks….In these peculiar times only extremely rare people are involved. Cain is one of these. For every ounce of negative there will be an ounce of positive. That is natural law. Its Cain the black who only tells truth against obama the half black who can only lie……
Report Post »Don’t believe for one second that there is anything normal or regular about these events and people. There has never before been a situation like this one….never will be again.
NightWriter
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 1:58pmI‘ve been in a position of having been ’sexually harrassed’ by a superior. I rejected him and ‘stomped off in a huff’. (probably not my smoothest move) I told no one, but my husband and my immediate supervisor (who advised me to lay low – I did) – I suffered two years of escalating trumped up ‘infractions’ – coming not from my immediate supervisor – but from the ‘top dog’! This man then, for two cycles altered my evaluation reports from my supervisor (which had always been top-notch) and eventually removed my employee files from my workplace and kept them at the main yard.
After two years of constant harrassment – weekly in the course of doing my job… I gave up and left a job that I loved. I forgave – but never forgot…
I found out later that other women had been similarly approached – some complained to upper level management, and got the same treatment as I did – only they didn’t last as long as me… they were gone, and he was still there.
He was a black man… all the women were white. You can take what you want from that.
Do I remember the incident after nearly 20 years? You bet I do! Would I do anything differently today? I don’t think so. Would I come forward now if he were to run for office? Yes… to slap his face – (and stomp off in a huff) not to ruin him… he can do that himself!
All that said… I do not believe the Baileck woman… having been there and done that — she is not at all credible…
Report Post »Cemetery
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:29amUnfortunately it doesn‘t matter if he’s telling the truth or not. The media is NOT going to allow the American people to make their own decision on this matter.
Report Post »@leftfighter
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:33amWell, America gave a free pass to the Liar-in-Chief in the ‘90’s, why not Cain now?
Report Post »Jacque
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:34amWE already have :)
Cain 2012
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:46amYou mean We the People or the zombies? We the Peope do NOT participate in modern-day lynchings, period.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:29amIf this software is reliable and accurate Mr.Cain can ask,which government department do I go to get my reputation back?
Report Post »Rickfromillinois
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:28amYou will never hear about this on CBS or any other “mainstream” media outlet. Isn’t strange that Bialek used to live in the same building as Axelrod, that all of the accusers are from Chicago, and that all of the incidents took place during the 3 years Cain was head of the NRA, and only then? Could that possibly be because the new head of the NRA was a former chief of staff for Chicago mayor Daily and has been doing some digging in the NRA’s records? Isn‘t strange that Obama’s election to the Illinois Senate took place after similar accusations were made against his opponent and something very similar against his opponent for the U.S. Senate? Could it possibly be that this is just Chicago style politics as practiced by David Axelrod and our bumbler in Chief?
Report Post »chips1
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:43amChicago had Al Capone (aka) SCARFACE, and now they have B.O. (aka) SCARHEAD. It all fits together nicely.
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:47amYeah it sure is amazing how Cain is somehow intertwined in that crowd YEARS and YEARS ago.. She knows Axelrod and she knows Cain and axelrod knows obama who knows Daily who knows rham emeanuel and so on and so on… Amazing how YEARS and YEARS ago Cain was associated with all these people.. Make you wonder what the heck side he was on.. No one will vet him properly ( just like obama ) but they still will pull the lever (just like obama) ..
Report Post »manray favjet
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:05amExcellent take Rick. Ann Coulter has more detail over at Townhall.
Report Post »http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2011/11/09/david_axelrods_pattern_of_sexual_misbehavior
kryptonite
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:42am@DEMINT.DISCIPLE
If that’s your argument, fine, let’s discuss that. You may have valid reasons for not supporting Cain, but let’s not join in the lynching, please.
I think it is unrealistic to expect a black man to disassociate himself from the liberal community. Conservative blacks are few in number and ostracized by their own, so it’s quite an accomplishment to make it to the top like Cain did. He confronted Clinton on live TV when Willy was president, remember? Besides, he’s a businessman. Did you expect him to do business only with conservatives? C’mon, man. I’m more concerned about his 9% sales tax.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:09amKRYP: DEMINT is just a Lefty troll . Best to ignore.
Report Post »Fly on the Wall
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:20amI’ll only address one of your issues. When Obama ran for state senator against Jack Ryan the item that came out from Ryan’s divorce was rather unsavory. Even Judy Barr Topinka (R) said that Ryan wasn’t up front about the issue with his own party, leaving out the major details and glossing it over. As happens too often, the vetting process isn’t as good or complete as it should be. Or in some cases, the candidate isn’t completely forthcoming. Why didn’t Cain tell his own people about these previous claims, especially when he says he told the fellow who now works for Perry about it years ago (which the guy denies).
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:28amKYPT: So is Fly. His assignment: defend Obama from all charges of sleazy electioneering ( think Fly got the hardest assignment of the day !) So many Trolls…
Report Post »Fly on the Wall
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:51amBARBER2…Just pointing out the facts of the state senate race since RICKFROMILLINOIS had a lot of fallacies in his post. I was in Ryan’s camp until this information came out…then they made the mistake of importing Alan Keyes. They really blew it on that one.
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:16am@FLY ON THE WALL.. No, NO, NO you can’t point out anything you must align yourself with barber and the rest of the Cainites or you are a leftist obama supporting troll that needs to move over to the huffpo. sheesh!! Stupid you, don’t you know anything ? Funny ,he accuses us of the very friggin thing he is doing.. Amazing the hypocrisy.. Why is it funny ? because he doesn’t know any better..
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:23amDEMINT: Think you missed your last anger management session. Also the use of cuss words does not strengthen your statements it just makes you look like what you called me. Have a nice day…
Report Post »Doug in Seattle
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:28amI wonder if anyone but the Blaze will cover this.
Report Post »65Mustang
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:33amNo, journalistic intergrity is no longer needed for a journalism degree in our liberal colleges.
Report Post »Oldphoto678
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:57amNo, because it’s a big load of cr@p that only a right wing loone would believe.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:05amOLD: why do you bother to read all of this cr@p on the Blaze? Oh, I know your media assignment today is “trash the Blaze.” ( There sure are a ton of trolls out today) . You are so obvious to spot that even us old, dumb “crackers” can spot you. Why don’t you just go back to writing those “let’s have a revolution in America ” comments you write in your favorite propaganda tool, the New York Times? Oh, forgot. You already DID that for months before you all sprung up your Occupy Obamavilles all over the Democrat cities ! Never mind….
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:27amLOL – no. Cain is a serial liar.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:49amOh, so glad an “expert” with close knowledge of the man has tuned in….
Report Post »Unix
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:51amand you are a ceral head – full of corn mush!
Report Post »sawbuck
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:04amNOT
Report Post »This shows him not guilty more,as them lien whoes DOES.
Hook the lien whoes up to the machine ,If we want to go down that road,
proof please …or shut the hell up.They threw the stones ,back it up with a polly.
because thats all they have….. is ACCUSATIONS AND HEARSAY
Or are we now guilty BEFORE… proven innocent now?
Only a fool Prosecuter, would take this to trial with no facts ,no evidence.
It would be thrown out so fast it would make your head spin.
HIT-JOB AND YOU ATE THE WHOLE THING.
If Cain Goes Down….. So does America.
That will be .. 4 more years of Obama please..!
Not sure anyone noticed how“ Ohio” had their ass handed to them.
Obamas team is just waiting,and their not taking any prisoners.
We have nobody else that will come close to beat him.
Paul——Romney— – Perry—- no way in hell. where screwed.
And the “anybudy but Obama 2012′..”
new “MOTTO’ will be >>>.IT SUCKS > TO BE > US !
RightUnite
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:40amI thought I smelled a goat.
Report Post »NC
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:27amSome major news corp. will purchase one of these and start using it. Unfortunately, if it’s not Fox News, it will only be used to implicate GOP lies. The DNC will get a pass.
NC (I’m not lying)
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:23am@kryptonite.. Guaranteed if the test said he was lying and SHE was telling the truth ,number one, it wouldn’t be on this site and if it was on here for some strange reason, you would be saying the test is wrong that it isn’t to be believed and it is inadmissible in court anyway, yadda yadda yadda.. Predictable.
Report Post »No Name Yet
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:26amWe should have this running in the background on every Presidential Speech, every Presidential Debate, and every Congressional town Hall Meeting!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:31amJudson Phillips, the head of Tea Party Nation “Cain should drop out”
Report Post »“If Cain cannot run his own campaign, how is he going to run the country? A few days ago, I would have been willing to accept Cain as the nominee. Cain was not my first choice but I could have easily supported him. No longer.”
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/192735-tea-party-nation-leader-cain-should-drop-out
demint.disciple
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:36amLmao, so this is being done over a television set ? WOW !! Flawed from the very beginning.. How can the guy calibrate it correctly if he doesn’t ask Cain some True and false questions ? ALL the Cainite seals clap and say ” YES HE IS TELLING THE TRUTH !!!!
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:05am@DEMINT.DISCIPPLE
Report Post »It’s voice stress analysis not a polygraph. Works differently. You can believe it or not, but f you had a brain you wouldn’t need a machine to tell you what a liar this woman is. None of her “facts” added up; plus she’s a pathetically bad actor.
barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:55amDEMINT: Troll alert: the arrogance of the Left always gives them away. Experts on everything . Always offended when called on their superior attitude. Await an arrogant reply…
Report Post »Max jones
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 10:47amdemint disciple…..you don’t get it, that’s all. you are using your head and and not your soul. Your reasoning and not your intuition.
Report Post »I’m sure you are a fine fellow, but I would NOT hire you, nor would I recommend you to anyone for anything. I quit associating myself with pseudo intellectuals decades ago. You would do better In a more structured environment than this. it must be a real drag for you where you are….sorry.
Slipstick
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:25amThe misogynist in me says that when there is a he-said / she-said exchange, (especially about sex) what she-said should be considered suspect until PROVEN otherwise. With hard evidence. This PC world we live in is a place where no means no, no means yes, no means yes, (but later means no) and all of the other corollaries. This now includes just TALKING. I’m waiting for the day when a man can get castrated for THINKING about a sexual encounter with a woman, a la the 2002 movie, Minority Report…
Report Post »sondoggie
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:32amThe problem is, when the media continues the controversy, whatever it is, people believe them. Look what they did to Sarah Palin. The next front runner will have the same media treatment.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:40amI can understand libs trying to destroy a conservative black man’s reputation. I can understand Paulists doing it too — even conservative women who find it hard to be objective about sexual harassment . I CANNOT understand how a conservative man lets himself be drawn into this lynching ritual. I have lost respect for the likes of Carl Rove.
Report Post »TxSon
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:23amSo, when is the MSM going to eviscerate these women? We all know that women who bring unsubstantiated allegations against politicians are subjected to the highest level of distain … oh wait, that’s only if the politician is a Democrat… Never mind.
Report Post »One Man Progressive Wrecking Crew
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:22amNo surprise here. I just don’t think a man in his position then or now would waste his time chasing white skirt, as he even married a black woman. Old black men aren‘t like young ones who’ll drop their momma’s from a building for a white momma.
They‘re old school and don’t go for that stuff and Cain‘s old school in many ways and that’s why he’d make a good president. NO ONE OWNS HIM. At least YET.
As we can see over the past three years, Obama works and is owned by many, but doesn’t work for the American people at large. He picks winners and losers and 98% of working America are on the short end of THAT stick and the Muslim world the biggest recipients of his crazy decision making process or lack thereof.
Report Post »AhLeahIris
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:25am@OMPWC: You’re absolutely right about Obama. He’s an enemy; http://wp.me/p1HGwx-1sC
Report Post »Oldphoto678
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:01amYou must have meant no one owns him except the Koch brothers.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:42amOLD: That “Koch” brothers bit is getting mighty old, too. Love it when the Soros-Funded Left trashes the American Koch brothers. Is that your topic today on the Blaze to us “crackers,” the Koch brothers? Guess you you guys, it’s just peachy when the Left buys off the media, but boy conservatives had just better shut-up . How’s that closing down Murdoch business going for you guys these days ?
Report Post »Conkuur
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:21amYeah this attack is going to backfire on the perpetrators.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:31amThey have nothing to worry about, the MSM will cover for them.
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:40am@BARBER2
Report Post »Posted on November 10, 2011 at 9:42am
OLD: That “Koch” brothers bit is getting mighty old.. <<<<< That is old but ,leftist troll alert and go back over to huffpo,that never gets old ,huh ? You're such an idiot and can't even see it.
barber2
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 4:55pmDEMINT: And you think I actually care about your opinion on anything ? including me?
Report Post »AhLeahIris
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:19amIt’s amazing. Simply amaing technology: http://wp.me/p1HGwx-1t2
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:17amThat’s good news. Now let’s see that guy run that thing when Obama speaks. It would crash his hard drive.
Report Post »Slipstick
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:26amAMEN!!! Wish I had thought of this.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:26am.
Been there, Done that!!!
It now has a built in BS meter that shut’s down the system before any damage can be done…..
Report Post »Tradman
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:27amHA! LOL my friend, that’s so pin point accurate. Bravo and dont let anyone waste their time using the machine while the Bum in Chief is speaking; we all know it’s full of crap.
Report Post »hi
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 8:28amHa! Funny and true!
Report Post »SamIamTwo
Posted on November 10, 2011 at 11:39amLMAO…yeah…
Report Post »