Politics
Audio: Daily Kos Founder Says American Right Wing Would Behead if They Could
- Posted on September 7, 2010 at 6:54pm by
Naked Emperor News
- Print »
- Email »
Sign Up For Our Newsletter!
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 689 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 658 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 524 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 361 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 322 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 205 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 222 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- ‘Imperial President’: President Obama Issues Another Major Executive Order Read More
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 205 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Glenn Beck Radio
Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7
Listen Now
The Wire
- Obama says Romney would bring a 'losing season'
- Days after Isaac, thousands still in the dark
- NY pol's reliance on rabbi comes back to haunt him
- Mardy Fish pulls out against Federer at US Open
- Horror possesses box office in quiet end to summer
- Democratic convention speeches to remember
- Ivanovic beats Pironkova to reach US Open quarters
- Egypt Islamist says heavy metal concert Satanist




Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (295)
G_SOROS
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:53pmDANGLINGBAGS,
YOU’RE NEEDED BACK OVER AT MEDIAMATTERS HQ. MY SECRETARY HAS BEEN TRYING TO REACH YOU FOR HOURS…
ALSO, IF I’M PAYING YOU (PER WORD) FOR SPAMMING GLENN’S SITE WITH PROGRESSIVE TALKING POINTS, YOU’RE GOING TO NEED TO STEP IT UP A BIT… I EXPECT THIS TYPE OF POINTLESS DRIVEL FROM BROCK & BURNS; BUT C’MON, YOU’RE SO MUCH BETTER THAN THIS…
OH, AND PICK UP MY DRY-CLEANING ON THE WAY HOME…
Report Post »JeremyLynn
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 8:29pmYou really should cut his pay
Report Post »Hugh Williams
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 8:45pmI am glad I am not the only one that thinks he or she is a paid plant.
Report Post »Room 101
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 9:00pmOur brother has been smoking way too much hopium…
Report Post »kathydel
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 2:28pmLOL
Report Post »crashnburn
Posted on September 9, 2010 at 12:28pm*SLAPPING KNEE*
Report Post »-Funny Stuff!
captainbill66
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:47pmAnd the reason we care what this dude think is what?
Report Post »BigSkyGuy
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 9:17pmThe reason I care………I didn’t know a piece of chewed gum on the street could type so well.
Report Post »Tate
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:46pmWRONG MARKOS MOULITSAS. YOU WOULD KILL BUSH RIGHT NOW IF YOU COULD.
NONE OF US WOULD KILL OBAMA, CLINTON OR JIMMY.
YOU LIE “MAR-KOS THE MORON.” and FOOLS LISTEN.
Report Post »dudeman4
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:45pmOkay…. so let me get this straight… they said the Constitution restrains us from killing people? Doesn’t the rightwing “racist redneck people” absolutely LOVE the Constitution?
Report Post »Oh yeah… and another thing… over 40 years ago former Sec. of Agriculture Ezra Taft Benson said that if the anti-communist (don‘t pretend it’s gone away) organization you‘re associated with isn’t getting slandered left and right, you aren’t doing a good enough job. (That was paraphrased.) So everyone anti-communist can pat themselves on the back. Good job!
Rock Knutne ND
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:44pmLike I said in an earlier post.
Enjoy the ALL – CAPS moronic rants for their unintended humor and move on…
Kinda like the Tea Party when they confront an impostor in their midst.
Great to read all the intelligent commentary on many different subjects on this site.
Report Post »CheesecakeLarry
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:40pmDang it! They are onto us.BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA-koff-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Boolaboola
or
AkbarMujibar
or whatever they say.
Is it martini time yet?
Report Post »American Pride
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:40pmThis is beautiful.
Open mouth – insert foot. What a clown. Sure it is your right to call fellow Americans the “Taliban.”
After hearing your opinions, it is also my right to call you a “traitor.”
But I don’t want your head. That is disgusting. What would I do with it? Sit it next to the computer? Ugh.
Report Post »steve4u55
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:34pmNow appearing daily in the man 4 man section of craigslist….. danglingbags. TADAHHHHHH as always leaning left. A whole new meaning to left wing NUT job :)
Report Post »DE OPPRESSO LIBER
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:28pmThe Obama administration and the progressives want to change the Constitution of the United States. Obama study constitutional law only to learn how to pick it apart.
Report Post »bocapatriot
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:28pmThis discussion shows me a number of things.
1. They love talking to their own kool-aid drinking crowd.
2. They see the control and their agenda slipping away.
What’s next? They’ll claim that the Tea Party people are wearing Brown Shirts in secret ?
Report Post »Two words for these two ………“Ignore Them”
VaGal
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:26pmReally??? Just goes to show how desperate the progressives are. They know what they are saying is not true-they are just trying the same old thing from their marxist playbook-scare the heck out of their base to rev them up. Guess what-November is coming real soon…Hey I can even see it from my house!!! GBA!!
Report Post »Sunnyr
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:25pmNot unless we could start with that little insignificant communist twit, Marcos himself. Just kidding, I’d much rather *itch-slap him upside his silly looking face. Idiot.
Report Post »Reverend
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:22pmAll I can say is Wow!, can these people be anymore clueless?
Report Post »richierich
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 8:20pmI agree. Wow.
Report Post »Sadot
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:22pmWouldn’t the Libs, slaughter of innocent unborn children, be more like the Taliban beheadings. Lets see….both have innocent victims and both take a life…yup, its a match.
Report Post »crashnburn
Posted on September 9, 2010 at 12:24pmAstute observation… But that makes it so “black and white” (haha, I made a pun)… Lib’s like these guys can only operate in the gray area by redefining history to fit their ideals. Means are justified by the end.
Report Post »cacjohn
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:19pmThese two men are fools! The founding fathers felt they were doing God’s work as well. They wrote the constitution that protects the speech these two knuckle-heads spew from their ignorant lips. To compare Sarah Palina to the Islamo-Facists is pure insanity at best. Attention liberals… We (Christians) see the freedom of religion as a sacred right! After all, the ones (those pesky founding fathers again) who made the freedom of religion a right were primarily Christian. Seriously, do women (other than muslim women) were masks over their heads? Are women seriously treated like second class citizens (I know, I know – right now there are some women who would say yes, but I would encourage those women to visit the middle east and then re-evaluate their answer)? The left has to some day get a grip and realize that, though the USA is not perfect, our country is by far the greatest nation ever known to man – why? Because it was founded on the principals of Christ. Sorry, libs, kust the facts. Get your angry, misguided heads out of the proverbial sand – please! You just may start to enjoy life again :)
Report Post »walkwithme1966
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 9:00pmWhy do all of you assume that liberals aren’t Christians? I really resent that!
Report Post »p8triot
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 10:26pmwalkwithme1966,
All of us don’t. Some find it convenient to paint with a broad brush. It makes it easier to discredit/label a group of people rather than deal with individuals. Such is politics.
Report Post »Muckraker69
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 11:46pm@walkwithme1966:
Report Post »“Why do all of you assume that liberals aren’t Christians? I really resent that!”
Because it is extremely difficult to live a Christian life and still support the Liberal agenda.
rbqueen
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 10:08amwalkwithme1966
A large part of why a lot of people feel that liberals are not Christians is because the liberal beliefs followed by liberals today are not compatible with Christianity. Saying that liberal and Christian beliefs can coexist within the same person is like someone saying “I am a Christian even though I don’t go along with what God and Jesus says”. Of course there are as many versions of Christianity as there are fish in the sea. I would be more than happy to say that liberalism and Christianity is compatible with each other as soon as the beliefs and goals of liberalism change to reflect God’s word.
Disclaimer: I do believe that some Christians can lean towards the leftist/Marxist beliefs but if they stay true to God’s Word then those leftist beliefs will soon fade away into the darkness that they came from.
Report Post »K Williams
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:19pmThey are right about one thing . It is a battle between good vs evil.
Report Post »ThinkLikeABlackBelt
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:19pmI have to shake my head at the “Run for your lives, the Christians are on the rampage!” mindset. These DK types make conservatives out to be a horror show of rigid, crippling religious rules — rules they are supposedly salivating to put everyone under. How is that going to happen in this day and age? I‘m reading David Barton’s book “Original Intent,” and it makes it clear just how hobbled Christians and conservatives are in this country. Besides, the Gospel is about giving, caring, and love, not enslaving others. I guess it’s hard to see Truth when Lies make you feel better.
Report Post »fvfdgm1
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 11:39pmPlus, if you read David Barton’s book – “Setting the Record Straight about American History in Black & White”, you would know that women had the right to vote in the 1700s. Black & white Americans went to same church in Phila. There were black & white founders. After the Civil War & Reconstruction afterwards, the Democratic party started the Ku Klux Klan, went out of their way to threaten.murder/maim any black man who tended to vote Republican because dems voted against every anti-slavery law on the books & when they came into power after that, they voted to remove laws that would have protected Americans of all colors. When the KKK killed people, they also killed white republicans, who favored the anti-slavery laws. The DNC removed this section of history from their website. Check out Barton’s books. You will learn about the history that was hidden from all of us!
Report Post »Chico
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:18pmWho is this buffoon ?? Igor…. Yes master yes..
Report Post »Sicboy
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:16pmThose freaks will say anything to get attention. The sad thing is, there’s a lot of people out there that believe the things they say. How can we ask God to save us when so many have turned their back of the Lord.
Report Post »robert5635
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:16pmAgain a bunch of liberals spouting off like a bunch of 5-year olds. ‘Straining at a gnat, swallowing a camel’. Jesus Christ
Report Post »hbear
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:13pmRight ==Christians want to follow what the bible says. That is the bottom line for Christians. If you are an atheist—-you will never get it UNLESS you read the bible. Beck, Palin and other conservatives know what the bible says. Read the Bible and then read the Quran. Perhaps you will get it and if not, it is the Lord’s will. We do not have to change out beliefs for you Atheists.
Report Post »JClem17
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 1:10amHBear,
I’m a former christian (albeit a weak christian) and you know what convinced me that it is all but myth and legend: reading your good ol’ babble. So please stop being condescending as many atheists are former believers who probably know more about your religion and holy book than most average Christians.
I’m fiscally conservative/socially liberal but you religious folks need to relax because you alienate many folks like myself with all the religion nonsense. In case you forgot, we live in a secular republic with freedom of religion, which also entails freedom from religion. So please keep your jesus to yourself and I’ll keep my godless heathenism to myself.
Report Post »mburns_08109
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 9:20am@JCLEM17:
> I’m a former christian (albeit a weak christian) and you know what convinced me that it is all but
> myth and legend: reading your good ol’ babble.
Then perhaps you have a reading comprehension issue. I am the reverse – I wae raised Catholic, rejected all religion in my teens, and remained convinced that being a “good” person did NOT require any GOD-thang well into my mid 20s. Then, I began to OPEN MY MIND again and intellectually re-evaluated *EVERYTHING* again from scratch. In the process, I picked up that “babble” you referred to and actually READ IT and studied it. I judged it by the available evidence and the patterns of the logic the story/stories all present. The evidence for the reality of God as a loving God, who sent his son to die for our sins when we were all still lost to him and hated him and what he represented to us at the time he was among us left no doubt in my mind to the undeniable truth of his divinity – and the equally undeniable truth to OUR LACK of anything resembling Divinity – that I was inspired enough to change. I am today as devoted a follower of Christ BY INTELLECTUAL CHOICE as well as by faith.
The same chance to choose agian remains open to you so long as you yet live. Are you so sure you have chosen wisely in this regard? What was your real level of effort at reading and comprehending what is in the Bible? (and that is a real and fair quesiton, not a criticism.)
> I’m fiscally conservative/socially liberal but you religious folks need to relax because you alienate
> many folks like myself with all the religion nonsense.
Perhaps that is because you are overly sensitive on the subject of religion for some reason? As for your “socially liberal” mindset, I understand this – to an extent. God himself gives us the freedom and the power to choose what we will do with our lives, and if that is not a “liberal” ideal, then I don’t know what is. OTOH, He will also hold us accountable for what we do with that power to choose. So, really, if we are to care for one another (as Christ taught us as the second greatest commandment), should we not care enough to try and help each other make the best choices possible? ..in SPITE of how we may each FEEL about that?
> In case you forgot, we live in a secular republic with freedom of religion, which also entails freedom
> from religion.
Sorry, but you are just wrong on that point. Allow me to explain, you are guaranteed the freedom to choose what religion to practice (including none at all) and freedom of how to express that viewpoint. You are NOT guaranteed to be free FROM anybody else’s freedom to express their views on religion or any other subject. Freedom TO Choose is NOT the same thing as freedom FROM others’ choices. This is a logical impossibility on its face. Any other interpretaiton is a violation of the freedom to choose and express for _someone_. It must either be freedom for all, or it will be freedom for none.
Think about that logic a little bit more carefully and you will understand my point.
Report Post »mburns_08109
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 9:50am@JCLEM17
> I’m a former christian (albeit a weak christian) and you know what convinced me that it is all
> but myth and legend: reading your good ol’ babble.
Then, perhaps you have a reading comprehension issue? – Or perhaps you just didn’t do that reading with a truly Open Mind? I was born into a Catholic family but rejected all religions and Gods as a (typically rebellious) teen. I was convinced by the left-think that “God” was unnecessary for people to be “good” folks. This continued well into my 20s, but as I grew older I slowly began to question _everything_ again, most especially my own presumptions about life and reality, including those about religion and faith. So, I eventually (after much foot-dragging on my part) began to open and READ that “babble” you refer to. I studied it, because I wanted to know whether the critics or proponents thereof were more right. The more I studied, and the more questions I asked, with an OPEN MIND, the more convinced I became of two key things: 1) Yes, there IS s God, and 2) WE ain’t HIM. Among my other important thoughts on these central questions were these: Even if we’re WRONG about point #1, are we better off in believing in a God (especially a loving, caring God who preaches peace and understanding amongst men), or not? Thus I came to CHOOSE to believe in Christ – after carefully evaluating all the available evidence with an open heart and mind.
The chance to choose again remains open to you as well while you yet live.
> I’m fiscally conservative/socially liberal but you religious folks need to relax because you alienate
> many folks like myself with all the religion nonsense.
I really understand the tendency towards socially liberal thinking. But consider this as well: did not God grant us both the right and power to choose to wether follow or abandon Him? If this is not the ultimate expression of a liberal ideal, then I don’t know what is! OTOH, We are also taught that He will demand form us an accounting of how we used that power he gave us to choose. in the end, are you all that certain that you have chosen truly wisely thus far (and that is a fair question, not a criticism)?
> In case you forgot, we live in a secular republic with freedom of religion, which also entails
> freedom from religion. So please keep your jesus to yourself and I’ll keep my godless
> heathenism to myself.
I’m sorry, but on that point you are just totally wrong, and I don’t need the Bible or Jesus to prove it to you either. We are guaranteed the right to choose our religion (or lack thereof) and how to express that choice/view. This is NOT the same thing as being free from anybody else’s choices or their expressions of those choices. The moment that anybody is restricted in when, where, and how they are permitted to express their views (on religion or on any other matter) is also the moment where the freedoms of speech/expression (and of choice) are abridged for _some_. Logically, you cannot have it both ways. Freedom to choose is not freedom FROM others choices (or the consequences thereof). If you wish to go down that road of thinking, we will inevitably circle back to the “who’se got the most brawn to back up their words/wills” territory, and really, is that where you want this to end up? I don’t.
I have no more desire to “force” my will upon you as I would wish you to inflict your will upon me or my family. I would, however be happy to allow you to convince me, providing ai get the equal chance to convince you – with thoughts, words, and logical discussion – not with forces of arms.
So sorry, but “Freedom OF” is most definitely NOT the same thing as “Freedom FROM” – EVER.
Report Post »(and if you’ll notice, I didn’t have to either attack you personally or denigrate your family/heritage/etc to address you on point…and yet you’re still free to either agree or disagree with me. Isn’t freedom of expresison great?! – freedom FROM expresion meansa I could be barred from ever posting this reply to you.)
JClem17
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 10:53amMBurns,
I clearly said keep your religion to yourself and I’ll keep my non-belief to myself. Looks like you are the one who has the reading comprehension problem not me. You will NOT find atheists walking around and trying to deconvert folks from religion but every day you religious folks are pushing your religion on us. So please stop with the persecution complex and grow up as you are the majority in this country.
I read the bible and was horrified by the malevolent bully that is the god of the old testament. Can you please enlighten me to the moral of the Lot story? Also, why are you not keeping slaves as your bible says? There are so many immoral things in the bible that I could go on forever.
Here’s a quick list of murder in the bible: http://www.evilbible.com/Murder.htm
Report Post »Because we all know smiting people for being curious or from the wrong tribe is the most moral act.
Arbon
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 12:46pmI am sorry for MBURNS_08109 bias. It makes me so sad that so many conservatives can be so intolerant.
Report Post »I am a Christian and conservative, but I also understand, as our founding fathers did, that we need to be tolerant of all opinions, races, religions, and creeds.
mburns_08109
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 1:24pm@ARBON,
> I am sorry for MBURNS_08109 bias.
> It makes me so sad that so many conservatives can be so intolerant.
> I am a Christian and conservative, but I also understand, as our founding fathers did,
> that we need to be tolerant of all opinions, races, religions, and creeds.
Huh? what the heck are you talking about? where in my post did I show bias and intollerance?
(I did apologise for the duplicate posting elsewhere)
I did challenge HIS LOGIC, is that where you are finding intollerance? if so, then perhaps we need to discuss some more fundmental word definitions as well (in the spirit of a mutual persuit of the truth rather than one of confrontation or arrogance – if that‘s where you think I’m coming from).
Report Post »EZBurns
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:11pmOh please— project much? The biggest haters are the left—- Just read Kos or HuffPo.
Leave me alone and I’ll leave you alone….and stay the HELL out of my pocket book.
Report Post »Ellie
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:11pmI’ve said it before, I’ll say it again, every time the progressives claim we would do some horrible thing such as this, it only serves to display the depth of their evil.
In the end they only indite themselves.
Report Post »Rickfromillinois
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:09pmThese two are whack jobs are not only disgusting but the are disgusting. I keep hearing the “haters” accusation being thrown around allot but I have seldom heard a more blatant example of pure hatred then I have heard from these two. Just a couple slimy pukes. If in fact American Conservatives were anything like the Taliban they would have their heads cut of regardless of the Constitution or the law. Fortunately for these two clowns Conservatives do believe in the Constitution and the law. They realize that and that is why they feel free to spout their poisonous hatred.
Report Post »Bunnie
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 6:10pmHuh?
Report Post »Caffeinated Texan
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 6:20pmI think you make an interesting point.
If conservatives are really as dangerous as liberals say, why do they have no fear of denegrating us? If we are the types of people who would behead someone for inflaming us, why did Anderson Cooper have no fear of labeling us “T**b****rs”?
I won’t type out that disgusting nickname…
Report Post »janisallen
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:05pmHate America? Delta’s ready when you are.
danglingbags
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:17pmSORRY TO USE MULTI-SYLLABLE WORDS TO YOU LOW-BROW RIGHTIES. HE IS A USING A METAPHOR.
BUT, THAT BEING SAID. HE IS USING AN INTELLIGENT APPROACH TO HOW THE RIGHT WING OPERATES. LOOK AT THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE TALIBAN AND THE TEA PARTY.
YOU TEND TO BE UNEDUCATED
YOU TEND TO LIVE IN RURAL AREAS
YOU LIKE TO CARRY GUNS
ARE GENERALLY OF ONE ETHNIC BACKGROUND
YOU SEE YOUR RELIGIONS AS THE ONLY CORRECT WAY
YOU NEED A LEADER AS IF YOU WERE SHEEP.
ONE THING I DO HAVE TO SAY IS THAT THE TEA PARTY DOES NOT CURRENTLY PROMOTE VIOLENCE AND YOU TEND TO BE MORE NATIONALISTIC THAN TRIBAL. BUT WHEN SHARON ANGLE TALKS ABOUT 2ND AMENDMENT REMEDIES AND I HEAR TALKS OF SECESSION,I DO GET A BIT WORRIED.
REMEMBER ..GOD IS GOOD BUT GOLD IS GREATER SO BUY GOLD.
Sicboy
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:26pmLook at me, I’m so intelligent i use “CAPS”.
VaGal
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:27pmDanglinbags, why are you shouting? you sound very angry.
Report Post »tmeyer38
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:29pmYou should read more. Tea Party members are better educated, hold high degrees, and make more money that most Americans. And this reasearch was down by the liberal AP. So if the they are smarter, better educated, and richer maybe they are on the right track.
Report Post »cacjohn
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:30pmDanglingbags – May I first recommend you get a bra (based on your user name). Second, you all want us to appreciate the freedom of religion – which of course in in the first ammendment. That, I agree with. However, please read on to the 2nd ammendment where we, the citizens of this awesome country, have the right o protect ourselves and the prcious rights we rwad in the 1st ammendment. There is a resaon that the right to bare arms is the 2nd ammendment – to protect the rights found in the first from a tyrannical government – liberalism (i.e. Socialism) is a form of tyranny. I choose freedom, so I support thr right to defend my freedoms as well. Please study the constitution instead of picking out the pieces you like and wiping your filthy behind with the rest.
Report Post »deadmeat
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:32pmThe closer we get to November, the more the left seems to make ‘over the top’ statements. It reeks of desperation.
Report Post »VaGal
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:36pmDanglin Bags, is your real name Keith Olberman?
Report Post »Cynewulf
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:38pmDangle, you are so right. They both tend to wear clothes. They both eat food. They both tend to walk on two feet (though how is beyond me, they are both not that far removed from their four legged predecessors). If the men don’t shave, they both grow beards. Holy crap! the similarities are uncanny! These Teabagging vermin are a threat to tolerant Americans everywhere. They must be rounded up and disposed of!
jmiles82
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 7:52pmTell OBAMA – HE is the one we hate – not America…
Report Post »Debrabate
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 8:22pm++++posting sign++++
DO NOT feed the TROLL!
:)
Report Post »Hugh Williams
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 8:35pmDanglinbags How is everything at Media Matters?
This poster is a paid leftist plant sent here to try to goad people into responding to him with hateful replies. They want to paint everyone at The Blaze as crazy, hateful Glenn Beck zombies. Please do not respond to this baiting.
Report Post »danglingbags
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 8:37pmVAGASIL I AM NOT KEITH O. HE IS TO CONSERVATIVE FOR ME.
Caffeinated Texan
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 8:40pmOkay, Dingleberry, let’s parse your hypothesis regarding the similarities between the Taliban and members of the Tea Party movement.
YOU TEND TO BE UNEDUCATED
False. In fact, members of the Tea Party tend to not only be educated, but also well informed; having real opinions about current events. At any rate, they are better educated than the inner-city high school dropouts that the democrats rely on to win elections.
YOU TEND TO LIVE IN RURAL AREAS
If by “Rural” you mean “you don’t live in New York City, San Francisco, or Los Angeles,” then I guess you have a point. On the top of your head.
YOU LIKE TO CARRY GUNS
Yes, and so do their sons and daughters, who join the military and serve their country. So, what have you done for America lately, Baggy?
ARE GENERALLY OF ONE ETHNIC BACKGROUND
So is america, if you look at the demographics. “Generally” simply means, “the majority of you” and, frankly, that applies to a lot of our country. Notice how monochrome the left side of the Senate chamber is?
YOU SEE YOUR RELIGIONS AS THE ONLY CORRECT WAY
Yeah, and you libs are so tolerant of dissenting points of view with regards to your religion of choice: government…
YOU NEED A LEADER AS IF YOU WERE SHEEP.
Dangles says, while bowing before a shrine to his great leader, Barrack Obama.
Hugh Williams
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 8:52pmDanglinbag
Way to go. Calling VAGAL, VAGASIL boy are you clever. Why have you not responded to any of my comments about you.
Please admit to use all that you are paid to try to get hateful replies.
danglingbags
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 9:07pmHUGH W
I AM NOT PAID USE THE INTERNET.
I ENJOY POLITICAL DISCUSSION.
stonebrash
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 9:13pmBut you don’t discuss, you rant. I know you are working hard to stir up trouble but, my goodness, you are going to give yourself an ulcer!
Report Post »c10win
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 9:20pmYo, bo dangles… I can use caps too.. HAHAHAHA! See, it’s not that hard. ;) How much would you charge to go on over to the huffing ho and pretend to be conservative?
Report Post »Debrabate
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 9:48pmI cant believe no one corrected Danglingbags on the second ammendment comment so here goes (and yes I Wikipedia’d it):
The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution is the part of the United States Bill of Rights that protects the right to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights.
Two U.S. Supreme Court rulings in 2008 and 2010 clarified the meaning of the Second Amendment. In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia,[1][2] and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. It further held that three Washington, D.C. ordinances banning usable firearms in the home were in violation of the Second Amendment. In McDonald v. Chicago, the Court determined that the Second Amendment limits state and local governmental authority to the same extent that it limits federal authority.[3] The Supreme Court also stated that its ruling was not to be taken as an indication that all firearm restrictions are unconstitutional.
guys… please dont let dangling reduce you to the same level as his mind works on… we are all better than that I am sure.
Report Post »Rickfromillinois
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 10:16pmDangle,
Your “understanding” of the 2nd amendment is truly amazing in it’s stupidity. It only applies if you are in the military and only if you are talking about flintlock firearms? The mind boggles at your ignorance. Fortunately last month the Supreme Court made a decision that American citizens have the individual right to own modern firearms. I would say that it opposes your view but no one else in the whole country has proposed what you “think” that the 2nd amendment means. You really are just a kid aren’t you? I think that I hear your mommy calling.
Report Post »SPKnarr
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 10:18pmAMEN!!
Report Post »beekeeper
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 10:22pmDANGLINGBAGS wrote:
“the second amendment only assures you the right to bear arms if you are in the military and it is limited to either a musket or flintlock pistol which was the current technology in 1789”
First off, it is not limited to those in the military, it is so that a militia might be formed quickly.
Second, it is not limited to muskets or flintlock pistols – neither firearm is mentioned in the ammendment, nor is there any stated or implied limitation on the type of gun.
Third, you really should consult the source document and stop imagining that the things your sources tell you are in there are actually in there – the words abortion, helathcare, and housing are not in the Constitution either…
Finally, check out that thenth ammendment, it says anything not enumerated in the constitution or surrendered by the states to the federal Gov’t are reserved for the states (and no, not just the original 13, ALL the states).
There, that should keep you busy for a while…
Report Post »sjwanderer
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 10:24pmWow, ding-a-ling, you are just informed enough to form some opinions and those are based on simple gut reactions. I did that when I was fifteen years old and I once thought that socialist/communist ideas were good. So my reaction is that you are either young or VERY uneducated (yes I know how to use caps too). Forgetting those assumptions let me address a point or three that you tried to make that some seem to miss.
I am not of a single race. Yes I appear white but there is a very vast cultural/race contribution in my past including black and Indian (yes both) along with Irish and many others. My family has a history of not being racist at all and in all affairs.
By “uneducated” I’m guessing that you think most of us did not finish high school or even go on to advanced education. You are wrong most of the people you criticize so vehemently (sorry big word) have gone through advanced learning and vast life experience, which can be even more important in some matters. A decent high school education (you must have had a recent public school education, sorry) would show you how socialism and communism fails. It would also show you how a democracy will grow into either of the previously mentioned types of societies. Both societal/economic environments rely on the lack of education of its citizenship to grow into power and maintain power eventually resulting in revolt, historically violent, and we wish to avoid the violence. So I refer to the point in the first paragraph, you are either young or uneducated.
As for your last concern about arms, yes I have right to protect myself and I have proven that to the authorities. This does not mean that I carry a weapon or carry out my daily life with a weapon on my side or the threat of it. Rather it means that if I am threatened or my countryman, yes you included, is threatened I would use every method at my disposal to protect life. I would never use a weapon to protect simple possessions but life is another matter.
Report Post »AmericanPatriot01
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 10:26pmHey DINGLEBERRY!!
Stop yelling!! We are not deaf!! and we don’t get paid to banter on these forums like you do. We are patriots and we believe in the principals we talk about. we don’t frequent your liberal blogs and make fun of you and your friends. You hide behind your computer like your pinko friends and spout the rhetoric from your marxist playbook. You don’t have the guts to serve your country or promote sanity, so go hang out with people who would exhault your ideals, you know, like the rest rest of the progressive jerks that sign your paycheck.
Report Post »Debrabate
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 10:41pmAGAIN I Wiki’d it.
The Third Amendment (Amendment III) to the United States Constitution is a part of the United States Bill of Rights. It was introduced on September 5, 1789, and then three quarters of the states ratified this as well as 9 other amendments on December 15, 1791. It prohibits, in peacetime, the quartering of soldiers in private homes without the owner’s consent. It makes quartering legally permissible in wartime only, and then only according to law. The Founding Fathers’ intention in writing this amendment was to prevent the recurrence of soldiers being quartered in private property as was done in Colonial America by the British military under the Quartering Act before the American Revolution (1775–1776).[
No American soldier may enter my home unless I invite him… and even then unless he is with my Sailor husband, Soldier Brother, or MSGT Father, it is my decision… personal property…
can you at least check which constitutional right you are referring to BEFORE you refer to it….
Once again…
DONT FEED the ignorant troll… he apparently didnt finish 8th grade Civics classes yet.
Report Post »sjwanderer
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 10:46pmDanglings, I think you should read the 3rd amendment before you invoke it the way you have. This amendment allows us to refuse to quarter military without our consent. I will invoke this right when the government tries to oppress people, but I don’t see that soon. Just like the 5th you should know what your are invoking before speaking.
Report Post »IX-XI
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 10:51pmthis “danglingbags” dumba$$ hasn’t examined the demographic makeup of the Tea Party–far more educated than the average Democrat supporter. Above average income. AND GRASS ROOTS–READ “NO LEADER.” Oh yeah, we just have to follow a leader.
The Tea Party movement didn’t arise because of some leader. Tea Partiers like some leader types, but they occupy no leadership role in the movement–they’re just having a good time watching this thing grow on the individual initiative of millions of middle class Americans.
Watch out, Danglingbags. The Silent Majority is 7 weeks away from cutting those danglers off.
Report Post »stykbo
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 10:58pmKeith Dobermann has no danglin bags. And this guy is a wishful thinker. Hey, whateverbags you are…gold will do you no good at the Judgment. Heard of it, ain’t ya?
Report Post »rocktruth
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 11:02pmThis is PURE PROPAGANDA.
The media is trying to make people think that the Tea Party is tied to Religious Fanaticism.
They are trying to divide and hinder Tea Party growth resulting in a smaller and a less unified Tea Party.
To me, this type of propaganda makes the progressive liberals look desperate and uneducated with the real issues.
Report Post »dazyann010501
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 11:03pmDEBRABATE,
Report Post »You did a good job explaining the Second Amendment. I just wanted to add what it says in the Heritage Foundation booklet on the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States.
Amendment II: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Hugh Williams
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 11:13pmDanglinbags
Do your puppet masters at Media Matters tell you to shout in all your post?
Report Post »KyooMac
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 11:19pmD-bags, did your mother and father not love you enough? If love is what you’re looking for, you came to the right place. C’mere and let me give you a hug.
Report Post »colecamp
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 12:17amYou don’t need to yell.
Report Post »FToth84
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 12:34amWOW! This guy is a loon. Coming from a Right Wing (former)Bio Major…. I guess that makes me really crazy. These guys are reaching soooooo.. far these days. I don’t even know what to say. Ask anybody that knows me. It takes A LOT to leave me speechless, but that’s about where I am right now!
Report Post »DGroundhog
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 12:42amStop fomenting violence by using all caps, dingaling.
Report Post »pillut48
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 1:08amDBags (isn‘t that a cute name you’ve picked for yourself? :-)
You wrote:
*YOU TEND TO BE UNEDUCATED*
(I’ve got two college degrees in education and taught in public skrools for almost 2 decades)
*YOU TEND TO LIVE IN RURAL AREAS*
(I live in a suburb of Big D, do y‘all believe Dallas is a little ol’ hick country town?)
*YOU LIKE TO CARRY GUNS*
(Don‘t have one but don’t have a problem w/the 2nd Amendment)
*ARE GENERALLY OF ONE ETHNIC BACKGROUND*
(OMG! I’m WHITE!! And CHRISTIAN!!!
But I‘m married to someone from India with skin darker than Obama’s, who is a DIFFERENT religion,
does that count for something??)
*YOU SEE YOUR RELIGIONS AS THE ONLY CORRECT WAY*
(Ummm, DB, don’t most believers of ANY religion/non-religion believe that
*their* belief is “THE ONLY CORRECT WAY” and that’s why they follow it??
And I’ve only got ONE religion, not religionS)
Anyhoo, to get back on topic–MarKOS isn’t playing with a full deck, because obviously he believes
HIS BELIEF IS THE ONLY CORRECT WAY, as do his silly sycophantic followers as well!
*YOU NEED A LEADER AS IF YOU WERE SHEEP.*
Report Post »(Oh, this one is really funny considering how liberals follow HolyO with a spiritual, mindless, zombie-like dedication!!! :-) LOL.
TruthHurts
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 2:35amOn Dingleberry, please don’t feed this troll. If he wanted serious political discussion he wouldn’t be using all caps in his post, or repeating the same thing over and over and over again. He is a plant who apparently does not work and may be one of those Daily Kos kids getting paid by George Soros to sit in his mother’s basement in his tighty whities, eating pizza while he baits right thinking Americans to say or write things that he can then twist and use against them. It’s sad really, he could be getting out and contributing to society. He probably is a contributor to George Soros latest anti-teaparty site. Please move on DB, you are a mile wide and about an inch deep. There is no substance.
Report Post »Augustus Cicero
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 3:10amDanglingbags, before you talk about anyone else being uneducated I suggest you learn the difference between “to” and “too”.
Report Post »klstj
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 3:22amunbelievable hate filled crazy wack jobs! Say a prayer for love and decency to survive the non stop assault of people like this. they will say and do anything to bring good and descent people down. sad…
Report Post »sliderblaze
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 7:13amDANGLINBAGS = Uneducated douche
http://www.dakotavoice.com/2010/04/nytcbs-poll-tea-party-supporters-more-educated-prosperous/
appears that tea party supporters tend to be more educated, a prosperous according to CBS and NYT, must suck being constantly wrong.
Report Post »Rodonuc
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 9:06amDangle-Dude (Dudette) I am making one exception in commenting on this Dingle-person….if I were the rest of you I would pretty much ignore what this person says. After skimming many a post here it seems that not only is Dingle mostly wrong, but most of the Dingle-posts are insipid lefto statements and attempted insults or name calling and it seems Dingle-person is more interested in trying to get some attention this way than making intelligent argument. I notice Dingle-person wrote that Bill O’Reilly was a birther…Bill has been staunchly PRO-Obama on this issue…but most of the those who deem themselves smart by mere fact they are left have no idea what the facts are about much of anything and get their daily Pablum from bloggers of equal single digit IQ while feeling some sort of imbued eliteness due to their party leanings. Above’s generalities are further poof of what I have said here. I’ve seen folks like this on other posting sites…ignore them as I will from this second forward and they eventually go away.
Report Post »Diane Oliver
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 10:15amdanglingbags – I’m still praying for you dude…. God loves you
Report Post »timeisnow
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 11:04amTo all my fellow Conservatives that Love Our Country!
When A Radical Progressive Spews such nonsense it comes from a Chapter called Tactics, in the book called “Rules for Radicals” by Saul Alinsky. Page 126 Here is their MAIN AGENDA:
“Here our concern is with the tactic of taking: how the Have Not‘s can take Power from the Have’s.”
In case you haven’t noticed that’s Obama’s plan, Fundamentally Transforming America, into a Socialist Country…
There are numerous ways in the book to attack those who are in their way and those who want to destroy their opposition to this plan, and the Tea Party is currently their Main Target,…
Rule# 13 comes to mind: Identify, personalize, Demonize, Destroy… in this case it’s the Tea Party..
They know it’s a force they haves so far not been able to stop, they will try many ways to achieve this Agenda… These are very organized and Sick individuals as you can see by their newest attempt!
We can only stand firm, get out our message and the vote in November and ignore their tantrums, which will occur over and over again.
Report Post »NolanB
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 11:06amSo … DANGLINGBAGS, ”HE IS A USING A METAPHOR” is he??
Report Post »NolanB
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 11:09amExcuse me for being so uneducated? You see, I only have a Masters Degree. So sorry for being so uneducated. Did I spell that correctly??
Report Post »NolanB
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 11:12amJust one more comment for DANGLINGBAGS. I’m so sorry for being so uneducated. I only have a Masters Degree. Did I spell that correctly??
Report Post »bobby535
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 11:45amOh geeze Dangle, I wish I could be as intelligent as you. Where can I learn them big words? I need to know!! And name calling…love that. It just makes you sound like you know what you are talking about.
Just playin’ you love to come here all the time and call people names. Lets take an intelligent approach to how you are a tool and don’t even know it. Yeah that was kinda name calling, but you used it in another post, I’m just deflecting it back to you.
YOU TEND TO BE UNEDUCATED (Not true, lay off MSNBC for a while, all your press does is find the craziest people and put them on the air portraying them as tea party, or whatever they are trying dis-credit, to trick YOU. And it seems they do a good job. I could find just as many wacko, uneducated looking people that think the same as you.)
Report Post »YOU TEND TO LIVE IN RURAL AREAS (This is bad how? If it is just a similarity “sure, sure” hahaha, but there are just as many people in the cities that believe in small governement.)
YOU LIKE TO CARRY GUNS (More like we have a right to have them. Not many of us carry them around to intimidate people, and I’m sure you would love your right to have one as well if lets say the “evil christians” were taking over, and there was overwhelming evidence that they were going to force it upon you.)
ARE GENERALLY OF ONE ETHNIC BACKGROUND (MSNBC comes to mind again. “Just get the shots with the white people.” But yeah, I would have to agree that most people that engage in tea parties are white, but lets look at it intelligently shall we? When all the main stream is saying tea parties are a bunch of racists, why would I (if I were not white) want to attempt attending. I would be afraid. But ask any of the people “of color” that did go if they experienced a white only vibe from the crowd.)
YOU SEE YOUR RELIGIONS AS THE ONLY CORRECT WAY (No one is saying religion needs to be forced on anyone. We just think religion teaches values, and principles, good things to live by, and if everyone had values, principles, and respect for other people, people would get along, no matter what your religion. “you stupid sheep, you know you want christians to take over the world.”…not true. Are there some wacko christians out there? Sure there are, but there are wackos on every side of every thing. I’m not even christian by the way.)
YOU NEED A LEADER AS IF YOU WERE SHEEP. (What do you need? Big Government? Is that not need for a leader? You are a pawn, you dont even have the luxury of being a sheep. In the end game of what you are defending, you will no longer be needed. God is a guide, not a leader, anyone who is “EDUCATED” about religion knows this. In a nut shell: God says “this is a good way (take out the politics of “they are wrong we are right”) to live life, now it is up to you to MAKE DECISIONS. I will judge you in the end.”)
Revotelution
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 11:57amMetaphor: I think I understand. See if I have this corrdct. a) Something the left uses to flame a fire that isn’t there. b) Something the MSM uses to crucify the right. Thx for pointing that out.
Report Post »jessieH
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 12:18pmYou sound like Pelosi, when you bad-mouth Americans.
Report Post »ready4
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 12:37pmDanglingBags: If you don’t like what you see here, why not just go away. No one is forcing you to read or respond to anything on this site.
Plus, the all caps thing is just rude.
Report Post »BGMartin
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 3:02pmYeap, Danglebags is obviously one of the academic elite that’s had the common sense educated out of him or her. Hey, dudes can have danglebags too!!
Report Post »Docrow
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 4:52pmwow danglingbags got schooled
oops sorry….
WOW DANGLINGBAGS GOT SCHOOLED (this makes me seem more educated)
Report Post »Flagwaver
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 5:07pm“YOU TEND TO BE UNEDUCATED”
I am a college graduate who is working on a Master’s Degree.
“YOU TEND TO LIVE IN RURAL AREAS”
I was born in Sacramento and am currently living in a suburb or Portland, Oregon.
“YOU LIKE TO CARRY GUNS”
I do not even own a firearm, though I am proficient in the use of firearms because of my military service.
“ARE GENERALLY OF ONE ETHNIC BACKGROUND”
I am technically white, but am of Native American and eastern European decent.
“YOU SEE YOUR RELIGIONS AS THE ONLY CORRECT WAY”
I’ll give you this, as I am a Chaplain Candidate in the Army, though I fail to see what a philosophical identity has to do with it.
“YOU NEED A LEADER AS IF YOU WERE SHEEP.”
Actually, I was a Shepherd over the sheeple that elected the Obama Administration and refuse to see the evidence as long as the government keeps them on green pastures… even if the pastures are drying up quickly.
“ONE THING I DO HAVE TO SAY IS THAT THE TEA PARTY DOES NOT CURRENTLY PROMOTE VIOLENCE AND YOU TEND TO BE MORE NATIONALISTIC THAN TRIBAL. BUT WHEN SHARON ANGLE TALKS ABOUT 2ND AMENDMENT REMEDIES AND I HEAR TALKS OF SECESSION,I DO GET A BIT WORRIED.”
Report Post »Not to sound like Glenn, but please post a link to where there is mention of Secession. Evidence or it didn’t happen.
Caffeinated Texan
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 6:00pmI’m sorry to post twice to this subject, but it just occurred to me that DoucheBags’ list of problems the Tea Party sound far more applicable to the average Chicago street gang than to a bunch of grandparents who are tired of high taxes.
As a side note, it should be noted that Barry-O, while a member of the Illinois state legislature (apparently between campaign appearances for the US Senate) stated his opposition to making gang activity a capital offense.
So, we can see that the innability to see where the real danger lies in this country is something that exists at all levels of liberal hierarchy.
Report Post »honestyplease
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 6:11pmHey Danglingbags… are you really that ignorant or are you just being paid to feed unintelligent liberals more BS? Get a life…
Report Post »just a thought2
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 9:29pmHi Danglingbags,
I was wondering if you could fit any more generalities into your post if you tried. You have our demo pegged. Very astute of you.
YOU TEND TO BE UNEDUCATED … shoot, I have a Bachelors
YOU TEND TO LIVE IN RURAL AREAS … damn, I live in a city
YOU LIKE TO CARRY GUNS … right on, I do have one, score one for you
ARE GENERALLY OF ONE ETHNIC BACKGROUND … rats, I’m vanilla
YOU SEE YOUR RELIGIONS AS THE ONLY CORRECT WAY … schucks, I believe in God but don’t attend church. And I would never dream of telling anyone how they should live their live, I only have to be responsible for myself and my own conscience.
YOU NEED A LEADER AS IF YOU WERE SHEEP. baa, baa, baa, take me to your leader.
Look, you want a demo, here’s one.
A fiscal conservative. A military conservative. A liberal on social issues two issues: abortion (not my right to say it’s right or wrong for anyone else but me) and supports gay marriage.
A worried American who wants to know who we’ve gotten ourselves into hoc with to pay for all these programs. Who owns our debt? What countries have we gotten ourselves into bed with? Have we weakened ourselves by spending up to our eyeballs. Every time the news comes on it’s a trillion here and billions there. Who’s going to own our butts now?
Me being uneducated can you tell me who owns our tab? Who’s our lenders?
And what peg can you fit this profile into???!?!?
Report Post »