Politics

Perjury Charge: Congressman Launches Impeachment Probe of Chief Justice Roberts

Comments (442)

1 2 3 ... 12
  • RightPolitically
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:44pm

    Go for it AAA-hole!

    Report Post » RightPolitically  
  • Will NV
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:43pm

    It’s pitchfork time.

    Report Post »  
  • Sweet Sister
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:41pm

    So this is how they will spend their “lame duck session” well, what’s good for the goose…..

    Report Post » Sweet Sister  
    • Eyore
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 8:53am

      The Republicans are not tough enough to Impeach any one
      especially Boehner, He is going to be a real disappointment

      Report Post »  
  • voodoo donut
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:40pm

    They’re salivating at the thought of Obama replacing a couple of conservatives.

    Yesterday, it was Thomas. Today, Roberts. Coincidence? I don’t freaking think so.

    Report Post » voodoo donut  
    • utpatriot
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:42pm

      They have been working on this one since the President gave his speech where he took a swipe at the Supreme court.

      Report Post »  
  • Rita
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:40pm

    Planting the seed of doubt won’t accomplish anything except to turn the tables on themselves.

    Report Post » Rita  
  • Chalon Hutson
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:39pm

    Go Brown! It is the opposite of going green. Watch my video to find out how!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9gi8cESCzI&hd=1

    Report Post » Chalon Hutson  
    • w4jle
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:50pm

      I am convinced, I am getting rid of my hummer and have bought a 535 Hp Peterbuilt tractor to make my grocery runs! Besides the 4 MPG, after removing all the anti pollution crap I am getting that thick black earth destroying smoke. Go Brown, Nuke a Whale.

      Report Post » w4jle  
  • Daragon29
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:39pm

    Obama should be impeached for back tracking his oath to protect and serve the constitution of the United States of America.

    Report Post »  
    • Proud American in Buffalo
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 11:18pm

      Let’s be honest for the POTUS his Oath of Office was and is nothing more than an empty hallow promise. BHO does not believe in the very essence of what he was swore to uphold.

      Report Post » Proud American in Buffalo  
  • Givemelibertyorgivemedeath1
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:38pm

    I think if we’re going to go down the road of impeaching Supreme court justices, for enforcing the Constitution,maybe we should consider impeaching these Democrat Congressmen and Senators who have failed to keep their “OATH” to defend and protect our Constitution.

    Report Post »  
  • Will NV
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:38pm

    Impeach all the ******** first.
    They are all traitors.
    Tar and feather is too good for them.

    Report Post »  
  • IronhorseMO
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:38pm

    They should Impeach the 4 Justices who ruled against the Constitution when they ruled against the 2nd Amendment. It passed 5-4 and the 4 against ruled against the Constitution!

    Report Post »  
    • puekaw10
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 12:17am

      Justice Stevens who was one of them retired but kegan took his place and she is worse then he was I think. But I do agree with you plan you should just add Oboma and Biden to the list and Harry reed if he servives Nov. 2

      Report Post »  
  • Eternal Lucy
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:38pm

    UGH! I’m feeling ill. What’s next??

    Report Post » Eternal Lucy  
  • computerdweller
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:37pm

    They Don’t just want to take over the economy. They want the supreme court too. There’s a war going on within our country. They must be stopped now!

    Report Post »  
    • ron the veteran
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:01pm

      my son is in the military i had a talk with him all of you who have kids serving should talk to them too. after all they are our kids…..whos side are they going to take?

      Report Post »  
    • computerdweller
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:16pm

      Why do you think this administration was so upset when the supreme court of Honduras ordered the army to remove the president for violating the constitution?

      This president appointed thirty people(Czars) to study the federal agencies and provide the senate and congress with rule changes for these executive agencies that would give them(executive agencies) the power to make law. By the passage of those laws, the president, senate and house members violated the separation of powers mandated by the constitution.

      Report Post »  
    • Huckabee Gingrich 12
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 9:39pm

      @RON
      What, are you telling your kids to disobey their command if you think they shoud? Seriously, quit with the ambiguity and spell it out for everyone to read. What exactly are you recommending people talk with their military kids about?

      Report Post » Huckabee Gingrich 12  
    • ILOVEJESUS
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 12:13am

      They want it all – here and globally – all this is in the Bible – I am not surprised – but it is terribly hard to watch. I wish we could put them on a FAST BOAT TO CHINA!

      Report Post »  
  • Daragon29
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:37pm

    The progressives are now attacking the supreme court. Knew this was coming, get rid of conservative judges and replace them with progressive ones. Get ready guys for the country’s name change to the USSA.

    Report Post »  
  • Iamtheoracle
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:35pm

    what about congressional perjury on a consistent daily basis… if their lips are moving , they are lying

    Report Post »  
  • wildjoker5
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:34pm

    I like haw he agreed with the “dim” remark that was made.

    Report Post »  
  • oldeagle101
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:34pm

    Obama should go first…

    Report Post » oldeagle101  
  • kevtheatheist
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:34pm

    There we go. I was looking for good entertainment this election cycle. I was getting disappointed till I saw this. Now we are getting crazy! Thanks Pam!

    Report Post » kevtheatheist  
    • Kilkman
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 7:24pm

      We all know the remedies offered by the Constitution. But Why are you idiots playing checkers against an opponent who’s spent 100 years setting up the chessboard against you. Every day I watch the world news, I get more and more uneasy. Any one manages to start an uprising, Left or Right. UN troops will be patrolling our streets and our republic for all intents and purposes will be dead. We are not battling a few radicals in elected office. Its us against the world.

      A good sight for information
      http://kitmantv.blogspot.com/

      Report Post »  
  • itasca
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:33pm

    I hate these people. It is a deadly game they are playing.

    Report Post »  
    • ron the veteran
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:58pm

      do they really think we will lay down for this….

      Report Post »  
    • marine43
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:46pm

      I hate to disagree with Glenn but i agree with Broden. I swore to uphold the constitution against ALL enemies Foriegn and DOMESTIC. They will push us till the time is at hand. Hate like hell to say it.

      Report Post » marine43  
    • kenbrewerus
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 5:24pm

      Marine43, I, too, have been to war. Glenn’s right, Broden needed to keep his mouth shut about violence, as does everyone else who claims to be a part of the Tea Party movement. If you really were a marine, you would have learned what the rest of us did, and that is to never threaten. You make yourself, and the rest of us, targets. But then, I was in the army, MACV to be more specific.

      Report Post » kenbrewerus  
    • snowleopard3200
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 5:53pm

      @Ron the Veteran and Marine

      I hope it does not come to violent action being needed; with God on our side and us turning more to depend upon him again we will be able to succeed and make America the great nation again and even better than ever before.

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • AmericanPatriot01
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 11:01pm

      Ken – You are absolutely correct. Why give the enemy warning. It is the dumbest thing you can do. Let them think they are safe and unopposed then hit them at first light with full force. They will never see it coming. No reason to advertise.

      Report Post » AmericanPatriot01  
    • Jeetman
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 11:32pm

      @snowleopard3200

      “I hope it does not come to violent action being needed; with God on our side and us turning more to depend upon him again we will be able to succeed and make America the great nation again and even better than ever before.”

      You are not listening to Glenn. Glenn has had a few spots now that has talked about the difference between “Manifest Destiny” and “Divine Province”. You REALLY should become an insider and listen to his past recording about these two ways of thinking. What you posted is an example of “Manifest Destiny”. As Glenn put it…GOD is NOT on our side. WE have to be on HIS side!!!!
      America did horrible injustices based on “manifest destiny”. If we turn to violence, we will lose. We have to be patient and trust the lord. We have won. We just have to remain on God’s side. Violence is NOT God’s side!

      Report Post » Jeetman  
  • Bytor
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:32pm

    That’s it .. take this guy out ..

    This is EXACTLY how they are going to stack the courts with communists. Take out the conservative judges one by one.

    Well, I got news for them, we own guns, and we WILL use them!

    Bytor  
    • voodoo donut
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:43pm

      Yesterday they were going after Thomas. Today, Roberts. Tomorrow, Alito, I suppose. They think we’re stupid.

      Report Post » voodoo donut  
    • The snow dog
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:01pm

      :eave your guns at home big dog. the sign of ETH is rising in the air. :D

      Report Post » The snow dog  
    • p8triot
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 8:43am

      Calm down. Even if we did have a liberal court it wouldn’t mean the end of Republic. The Supreme court issues Opinions, not laws. Pretend they passed an Opinion that was contrary to the will of the Congress and hence the people. Congress can just fail to enforce or fund it. It’s happened before.

      Do you think our Founders wanted a system by which the will of the public was decided by only 9 people? Or however many reside on the Supreme court at any time?

      Report Post »  
  • roberja
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:31pm

    Desperate people do and say idiotic things! These democratic fools are running scared! Forced retirement is no fun! Most of the stories posted today are about the dems reaction to the coming avalance. No wonder soros refuses to sponsor their campaigns!

    Report Post »  
  • zagfan
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:31pm

    I live in Oregon and please trust me when I say, DeFazio is in trouble here. Once again they can’t speak of their accomplishments so they are grasping at anything they can to distract. I don’t think DeFazio will be around long enough to let the ink dry on his documents.

    Report Post » zagfan  
    • AnOregonian
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:53pm

      Please be right………. I’m working to put David Wu out of work!

      Report Post » AnOregonian  
    • TenStrings
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:00pm

      I too live in Oregon, I wouldn’t be too sure about defazio, although obama wouldn’t have been here lately if it is as locked up as it has been in the past. People here in the rural ares had better hand-deliver their ballot lest they end up in the backyard burn barrel of your local mail carrier. Ours is a far left wing activist. Rebulican yard sign = disenfranchisment IMHO.

      Report Post » TenStrings  
    • Sunnyr
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:00pm

      I, too, am an Oregonian and there are many, many more Robinson signs than DeFazio in my area, and I am hoping for a stunning upset that will see DeFazio out on his butt! This is the first time he has ever been challanged and he is not as cocky lately as he usually is. The fact that this IDIOT would try and impeach Chief Justice Roberts speaks to his Communist/Socialist mentality. He’s a JERK!

      Report Post » Sunnyr  
    • zagfan
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:08pm

      Hi Fellow Oregon hopefull! I live on the east side of the Cascades, where the ranchers, farmers and real people live. We are very conservative on this side…not like the coast.

      I am going to vote all the bums out given the chance.

      Report Post » zagfan  
    • sbirk
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:37pm

      Also from Oregon… right in the doggone Metro area. DeFazio isn’t my congressman, but if he were, I’d vote him out. He’s as liberal as they come. Funny how all these sewer rats who are faced with possible extinction are now making noise like they’re some sort of hero statesmen. What a pathetic display of hypocrisy.

      Report Post » Perry Fogwinkle  
    • orkydorky
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 8:26pm

      All you fellow Oregonians,…………………Don’t forget to vote against Ron Wyden and Merkley! They voted in lockstep with Pelosi and Reid. Both these guys sent me form letters stating that they voted for their constituents, but ran like hell from being confronted on the issues. Let Freedom Ring and vote these guys out!

      Report Post » orkydorky  
    • Masamune
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 10:03pm

      Don’t worry Orky we will soon enough. As a fellow Oregonian I can happily say I will be doing whatever I can to get those idiots fired in November. You’re absolutely right, they haven’t fought for their constituents and both run by the same liberal double-standards like the rest of the Democrats. Also, don’t forget about Kitzhaber! The last thing Oregon needs is him back in office! Go Dudley!

      Report Post »  
    • godlovinmom
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 4:21am

      I’m from Oregon too…and the only time we hear from this nut is right around campaign time…this guys ads are full of lies…he has done NOTHING for Oregon…let alone America…

      Report Post » godlovinmom  
  • Rickfromillinois
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:30pm

    Left wing nuts acting nutty. What a surprise. Wouldn‘t it be nice if the good people of Defazio’s district came to their senses and got rid of him.

    Report Post » Rickfromillinois  
  • Givemelibertyorgivemedeath1
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:29pm

    I think if we’re going to go down the impeachment road here ,I think we should start with all these Democrat congressmen and Senators who took an oath to protect and defend our Constitution.

    Report Post »  
    • ron the veteran
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:56pm

      amen

      Report Post »  
    • snowleopard3200
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:14pm

      Start with any of them who violated that oath; and where found out in breakage of laws prosecute them to the fullest extent possible.

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • michaelhandley
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:26pm

      You might want to start with the President. I remember him putting his hand on the Bible and swearing to protect the Constitution…..

      Report Post »  
    • GunnyB
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:27pm

      I say we start with the President. By his willful non-action on the border he has given consent to the invasion of the United States by any and all types of terrorists the likes of which we hear of everyday from Mexico. He has willfully aided and abetted this invasion and put our security at great risk. He has broken his oath.

      Report Post »  
    • walkwithme1966
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:28pm

      Oh give me a break – good luck on that one – and you will not win the Senate!! As for the Citizens United Decision is was one of the worse decisions every made by a court. http://maboulette.wordpress.com

      walkwithme1966  
    • tweaker
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 5:56pm

      I think they are going to open Pandora‘s box here and it’s NOT something they really want to do. If this is their (DEM’S) wished… let the games begin!

      Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 7:08pm

      I totally agree! They can’t win without going against the will of the people … we need to clean out Washington starting with these crooked politicians ! Let’s start with Obama!

      Report Post »  
    • AmericanPatriot01
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 11:11pm

      There are a couple of lists we can point to in order to identify the guilty!! First is a list of people taht are outright memebers of anti-American organizations like this list:
      http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/08/american-socialists-release-names-of-70-congressional-democrats-in-their-caucus/

      There is also the list of those that voted yes on the obamanation healthcare bill. They all need to be charged with deraliction of duty for voting for a bill they did not read or ecrutinize. A violation of the oath of office

      I will not re-state my opinions of mr obama, but he has publicly denounced the constitution of the united states on more than one occasion. = Violation of oath of office

      It all boils down to high treason.

      Report Post » AmericanPatriot01  
    • ILOVEJESUS
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 12:11am

      Amen
      Take osama-bin-lyin’ too.
      I think if we took students from my local high school and put them in Washington, and took ALL the current staff out – we would be better off.

      Report Post »  
  • wildjoker5
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:27pm

    And Kegain had no perjury because they didn’t ask her anything, except maybe, “How are you doing this morning.”

    Report Post »  
    • SheriS
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:21pm

      Wasn’t that Sotomeyer? The woman who had a hard time answering any questions at all and the Republicans let her get away with it!

      Report Post »  
    • Polwatcher
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:33pm

      Orin Hatch votes for all liberal judges.

      Report Post »  
    • nothingbuthetruth
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 7:36pm

      Sotamayor said she was for the 2nd ammendment and for gun ownership and the first chance she had a vote, she voted against it. She is the one who needs to be ousted.

      Report Post »  
    • mcFirst
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 10:39pm

      What you say at a hearing is all hypothetical bs. None of it is binding.

      Keep grand standing the suppreme court Obama and this is what you get.

      Report Post » mcFirst  
    • puekaw10
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 12:21am

      Oh no they ask her about twilight what is it oh ya Jacob or Edward. Most important for a supreme court justice.

      Report Post »  
    • ozz
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 6:50pm

      Kegain and Sotomayor both perjured themselves. This is clearly bogus.

      Report Post » ozz  
  • 2dollarbill
    Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:27pm

    Maybe we should impeach ALL of Washington?

    Report Post »  
    • untameable-kate
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:45pm

      No not all, just the ones who lie…nevermind. They just want to stack the courts with liberal judges. It may be time to get rid of all these lifetime appointments.

      Untameable-kate  
    • ron the veteran
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 3:55pm

      this is a left wing attempt to stack the courts in their favor. if we dont lock all these criminals up we are going to lose our nation and we all know what that means. most of us will not stand for this. if ya get my drift?

       
    • TRUTHLADY
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:03pm

      I dare say if perjury was a crime in Washington, we would not have a Government. The Capital would be empty and then we can fill it with people who have ETHICS and MORAL values. The GREED, the CORRUPTION, the LUST FOR POWER would be gone, and we can turn back to GOD and the CONSTITUTION as was originally intended.
      GOD BLESS THIS COUNTRY

      Report Post »  
    • snowleopard3200
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:07pm

      Mr Obama and the Progressives are making one final attempt to bypass the desires and will of the people by seeking to stack the courts with Radicals and Progressives. With all due hope this move will simply fall apart – for if even one judge is removed, and the court falls to a 4-4 decision on most of the cases, especially ones made by the activist and progressive judges of lower courts for the government, then those rulings shall stand and become effectively the new law of the land.

      http://www.artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm (mix art)

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:07pm

      Agreed. This is an attempt to stack the courts.

      The Founders got your drift some 230 years ago, my friend.

      We have the better arguments, which is why they’re trying this crap.

      Report Post »  
    • snowleopard3200
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:13pm

      By chance is there any way we could simply lock the doors to the house and senate, then weld each shut until all life ceases on the inside?

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • mplsmike
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:17pm

      They will have a hard time doing anything after 11-2-10. Besides they would have to have a majority in the House and Senate, and the few surviving Dems after the election will have little enthusiasm to lose what little power they will have after the lame duck session is over.
      This is a non-starter, just bluster for the children whistling past the graveyard of their careers.

      Report Post » mplsmike  
    • WestOfThePecos
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:18pm

      What if this ends up going to the Supreme Count?

      Report Post » WestOfThePecos  
    • Dakotobol
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:27pm

      Yeah, This is another democrat srong arm tactic to destroy the opposition. Roberts said”I won’t resign until this president is out of office”. This would be the only way to have any fair ruling since he is the swing vote. But, these thugs are gonna impeach him?!

      Report Post » Dakotobol  
    • thepatriotdave
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:28pm

      To ron the veteran,

      Ron, I hear ya. When the poeple are wallowing in the socialist/marxist gutter how much you wanna bet they are going to say… “what happened?”. They will end up blaming everyone except themselves, and yet they are the ones NOT willing to do anything.

      Its going to take an act from God and a bunch of well-armed citizens to right this wrong.

      PatriotShops.com

      thepatriotdave  
    • Polwatcher
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:32pm

      For now, impeaching Congressman DeFazio will do.

      Report Post »  
    • chazman
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:43pm

      Peter DeFazio, huh? You sure you want yer name out there … Peter? With all the crap you liberal Marxist are pulling right now, you sure you want to stick out like a sore thumb? Yer not smart, Peter, yer quite stupid … and you have already proved that fact.

      Lock and Load, Patriot’s …

       
    • HEARDENOUGHCRAP
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:55pm

      I agree, wholeheartedly, with Untamable Kate! Lifetime appointments, whether they are in the Supreme Court or Congress,are hurting…not helping. (Before there is an uproar about lifetime appointments in Congress, think Killer Kennedy, Robert Byrd, Patty Murray ,Barney Frank, etc.)

      Report Post »  
    • OICU812
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 4:58pm

      If anyone should impeached it’s Obama for disregarding the Constitution.

      Report Post »  
    • independentvoteril
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 5:08pm

      Give me a break.. they let Clinton go now they want the Justice.. they will do ANYTHING to stack the deck won’t they.. My sister a fairly moderate liberal has nightmares that the SC turns liberal even she knows it would be the end of this country..

      Report Post » independentvoteril  
    • indy1
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 5:16pm

      Only Bubba and Hitlery are allowed to commit perjury.

      Report Post »  
    • MrsHess
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 5:33pm

      This is all about keeping the spotlight off of all the Democratic crooks and their dirty laundry.

      Report Post »  
    • Hugebrass
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 6:12pm

      He has no case against Roberts and he knows it. He‘s only obfuscating the real issues that he’s running away from (his poor performance as a congressman).

      But “bring it on” as they say! While we’re looking into one of the best justices to come along in many years, why not have a look at a few other decisions that have been made recently. We can start with DC v. Heller, where Ginsburg and Stevens couldn’t have strayed further from the plain language in the Constitution. Now that’s a clear violation of their oath to defend the Constitution. Or how about Ginsburg’s breathtaking admission that “a too strict jurisprudence of the Framers’ original intent seems too unworkable”?

      Yes… unworkable for someone who is attempting to subvert our laws through judicial caveat rather than winning elections.

      And while were there, let’s do a thorough review of what’s been promised, sworn and then abandoned by a few others… (Read Mark Levin’s “Men In Black” for a magnificent case against judicial activism.) I say it should be common in our Constitutional Republic to bring action against any judge who legislates from the bench, directly through Articles Of Impeachment – most especially against judges who pontificate using international laws to influence our court (like Ginsburg and Stevens have both endorsed).

      NO, Congressman… You’re fooling no one with this charade.

      By the way, did you know about DeFasio’s other little piece of handy work the good congressman pulled off on Monday at a debate? Go to http://www.artrobinsonforcongress.com for a thorough review of what this despicable man did to a would-be citizen legislator by conspiring to keep Robinson’s supporters out of the venue and rigging an audience in his favor.

      Report Post »  
    • orkydorky
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 7:16pm

      DeFazio is up for election here in Oregon, we need to oust this commie. Isn’t there any conservatives or tea party people in Lane county? Come on there has to be someone down there with a little sense!

      Report Post » orkydorky  
    • Liberty40
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 8:20pm

      If you dont think the way they do……..Your out….Sad that our so-called respectable Government has come to this.

      Report Post »  
    • hamrs_62
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 8:43pm

      there should not be any life time appointments

      Report Post »  
    • Huckabee Gingrich 12
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 9:26pm

      You just know that Obama has it in for Roberts since he flubbed up the Immaculation. I actually hope Roberts did it on purpose. That was the best part of it.

      Report Post » Huckabee Gingrich 12  
    • WeveAlreadyWon
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 9:33pm

      Anyone else smell the sweet smell of Progressive Desperation? buckle up… they are desperate and it’s going to be a bumpy ride but we will win.

      Report Post »  
    • Anarcho Capitalist
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 9:39pm

      TRUTHLADY

      The capital would be empty except for Ron Paul

      Report Post » Anarcho Capitalist  
    • CYCLONE
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 11:11pm

      some people should just be dead or in jail…

      … 2-nd amendment was for a reason… PUSH MY BUTTON JERKWAD !!!

      Report Post »  
    • AmericanPatriot01
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 11:21pm

      I actually am starting to think that Ron Paul is our George Washinton. I will be voting for him in 2012. I sure as hell hope he runs for president.

      Report Post » AmericanPatriot01  
    • CYCLONE
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 11:34pm

      after Reagan… I’ve been writing in Ron Paul for President or Libertarian …one way or another the man is honest as the day is long….. only 2 people I have ever voted for are Reagan and Paul

      …I’m smacking my lips as soon as he forces the first audit of Fort Knox gold reserves since 1957… LMAO…and don’t forget the forcing of the Federal Reserve to open their books … already LMAO… so I‘ll just laugh Michelle’s roto-tiller @$$ off.. !!!… LOL !!!

      Report Post »  
    • MonroeFan
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 11:39pm

      Oh Prey tell Oregon actually grows a pair and flushes this piece of trash down the toilet once and for all.

      Report Post »  
    • ILOVEJESUS
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 12:02am

      Truthlady – good post – I say we also start with lowering the pay, getting rid of the perks, giving the same health insurance as the general public, setting term limits for anybody in government, taking away the President’s power to hire people, and making any “deals” worthy of immediate termination (like a ride on Air Force One if you turn away from your belief in pro-life).

      Report Post »  
    • jzs
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 1:01am

      Relax, no member of the Supreme Court is going to is going to be impeached, let alone convicted. Next!

      Report Post » jzs  
    • Meyvn
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 6:45am

      Not only is this a way to stack the Left, but now they want non-citizens to vote! :-P

      Report Post » Meyvn  
    • JKN
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 8:26am

      An impeachment probe should be launched against Barack Obama…

      During this deep economic recession, this president has just donated $100 billion over the next few years to the Global Fund… Our federal government cannot afford to offer our senior citizens a measly cost of living adjustment on their Social Security payments for two years straight; yet, we can send $100 billion to the Global Fund to help others around the world… Of course, this was done under the radar.

      Now Barack Obama has just signed a document, again under the radar, authorizing the arrival of 80,000 new immigrants mostly from Muslim countries in 2011. Obama states on this document that this is “out of humanitarian concerns and in the interest of the nation.” In the interest of the nation? With one in eight Americans living on Food Stamps and 15 million Americans unemployed, how on earth could this be “in the interest of the nation”?

      This country is being turned upside down…

      Report Post » Jackers  
    • notsodumblond
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 8:31am

      Democrats want 2 more years of insults of integrity of those that love the US ? What kind of sane people would want this?How much of this type of crap will Americans ingest? They have no shame….For the last four years they have been insulting American citizens instead of doing their jobs.

      Report Post »  
    • Eyore
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 8:50am

      Maybe we could Saw Off Washington and push it out into the Atlantic

      Report Post »  
    • tvr54
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 9:52am

      You have it right this is a backdoor play to stack the court in favor of the of the Dems, it will fail for certain there will not be enough of them left after the election to bring this before the whole house Period. If you sow the wind, you shall reap the whirlwind, so true the climate is changing, and i don’t mean the weather. “ Open your eyes to the lies America ”

      Report Post » tvr54  
    • Rubberball
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 10:17am

      Yes!

      Report Post » Rubberball  
    • beekeeper
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 12:12pm

      This effort is without basis. AFAIK. They want to hold a sitting justice accountable for statements made at their confirmation, as if they are binding commitments for the rest of their judicial careers?

      Pity they don’t view the Constitution with the same laved of sacred consistency…

      Any chance we can get the politicians on the left to extend this “logic” to campaign promises?

      Just a thought…

      Report Post » beekeeper  
    • 7.62AirMailComeGetIt
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 12:20pm

      2012 Ticket should read PRESIDENT RON PAUL V.P. JESSE VENTURA Speaker RAND PAUL.

      Report Post »  
    • slickmeister
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 12:38pm

      Look, how better to render the Constitution impotent than to appoint a bunch of radicals to the courts to “interpret” it (ie: rewrite it based on emanations and penumbras)?

      Judicial tyranny – the Leftists’ dream.

      Report Post » slickmeister  
    • beekeeper
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 12:40pm

      OK, a few factual pieces of red meat:

      From The Daily Kos, which in turn grabbed it from The Huffington Post:

      “DeFazio is doing so based on two points.

      Justice Roberts‘ testimony during the 2005 confirmation hearings and Justice Stevens’ Dissenting Opinion in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.

      In short, Roberts swore not to be an activist Justice and to follow the traditions of the Court. Justice Stevens dissent clearly demonstrates that Roberts did neither.”

      So what we have here is that DeFazio is going after SCOTUS Chief Justice Roberts based largely on the dissenting opinion of Associate Justice Stevens because Stevens felt that the court should not have heard the case, and the court expanded the case beyond what was brought before it.

      Wow, is this the first time an Associate Justice disagreed with the Chief Justices’s decision to hear a case? I think not.

      Is this the first time an Associate Justice felt the Chief Justice expanded the scope of a case beofre the court? I think not.

      What is unusual is that Chief Justice Roberts said, under oath, that he wouldn’t do either (as he referred to it at the time, he said he wouldn’t be an “Activist Judge”), and this Congressman has decided to draw some attention to himself with his “investigation” into impeachment proceedings – oddly timed to be announced before, but acted on, before one of the most contentious mid-term elections in years. How strange!

      But what is odd, is that they want to charge a sitting Supreme Court Chief Justice with and impeachemnt on the grounds of perjury, based on testimony provided in his confirmation hearing. For those of you, like me, that aren’t legal scholars, here is the best, most accesible definition of perjury I could find – I encourage you to look for a better definition if this one doesn’t suit your needs:

      “In order for a person to be found guilty of perjury the government must prove: the person testified under oath before [e.g., the grand jury]; at least one particular statement was false; and the person knew at the time the testimony was false.”

      Source: http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/p032.htm

      What is fascinating is the REQUIREMENT that the “person knew at the time the testemony was false” – how will Congressman DeFazio PROVE that then-nominee Roberts KNEW not only that Citizens United was going to come before the supreme Court, but that he would also (in the opinion of Associate Justice Stevens at least) expand the scope of that case?

      Seriously, how will Congressman DeFazio prove those two claims are true?

      Does this remind anyone of Rep. Conyers “mock impeachment trial” in the basement of the Capital?

      Huffington Post article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/22/peter-defazio-impeachment-chief-justice-john-roberts_n_771431.html

      Daily Kos article: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/10/23/912909/-DeFazio:-Impeachment-for-Roberts,-On-the-Table

      Rep. Conyers “mock impeachment” trial: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/16/AR2005061601570.html

      Report Post » beekeeper  
    • spreadcommonsensenot pc
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 5:57pm

      The Weeeeeenermobil keeps rolling the road

      Report Post »  
    • oldoldtimer
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 6:09pm

      any thing to get a 5th liberal left winger on the court so no matter what Obama does it will be made constitutional. Tme to do a courtesy flush on DC.

      Report Post »  
    • ajay58us
      Posted on October 24, 2010 at 6:45pm

      They just can’t help themselves. Think about all of the lies and half truths the two idiots the big flat ‘O” just appointed to the courts. This congress and administration are deplorable! Flip it on 11/02/10!

      Report Post » ajay58us  
    • pscully17
      Posted on October 25, 2010 at 7:00am

      http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Can_a_US_Supreme_Court_justice_be_impeached_and_removed_from_office the irony here is the last official calls for impeachment were in the late 50s, to oust justices accused of fosterimg COMMUNISM and trying to MAKE laws from the bench!! but, the good news is, a SUPER majority of the senate would be needed to actually impeach a judge 67 votes! that being said, its just a very sad disgusting display of desperation by democrats to alter the political make-up of the Highest court in the land, knowing full well that they will NOT retain majority status after Nov 2, and dashing ALL hopes of changing the Supreme GUARD!! also, a few months ago, there was a collective pledge by the CONSERVATIVE Judges to NOT retire Until OBAMA is out of office! That must have really pissed some WH officials off, huh? LOL!!

      Report Post »  
    • Bum thrower
      Posted on October 25, 2010 at 9:40am

      Ned to impeach Justice ‘Affirmative Action’ Sotomeyor; she said she supported individual gun rights and then voted against the decision in ‘whatshisface’ vs City of Chicago.

      Report Post »  
    • palmfrog
      Posted on October 25, 2010 at 10:08am

      Agree…. get rid of lifetime appointments!

      Report Post »  
    • goo4306
      Posted on October 25, 2010 at 6:26pm

      I once believed that all congressmen should be required to attend the show on the founders in Epcot at Disneyworld, but the lateest tripe coming out of Congress reveals that it isn’t education that they need but extermination- Vote out most inane incumbents beginning with theis AH

      Report Post »  
1 2 3 ... 12

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love