Award-Winning Animal Photos Found to Be Fraudulent
- Posted on September 8, 2011 at 1:00am by
Liz Klimas
- Print »
- Email »
You might believe the following photos were award worthy — the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency did. The agency awarded nature photographer Terje Helleso the honor of Nature Photographer of the Year in 2010 for his images of endangered animals.
You may be impressed too, but know this: he used stock photos and photoshop and lied.
Animal conservationist Gunnar Gloerson was not so impressed. You see, Helleso didn’t pay too much attention to the details. UPI has more:
“Doesn’t this lynx in the July greenery have a winter fur (see above photo)? How about the lynx that’s reflected in the pool, is it walking in the air or on land, and can you really see the paws in that angle?” Gloerson wrote in a blog Aug. 26.
Gloerson questioned claims by Helleso that the photographer has seen 150 lynx in nine months, when Gloersen had only seen 15 in 52 years of wildlife study.
On Saturday, Helleso admitted to the photo manipulations.
PetaPixel reveals the stock photos that were used to create Helleso’s photos. Pictured below are the stock photo and Helleso’s doctored image.
PetaPixel also points out that Helleso said this while accepting his award last year:
We nature photographers should never forget the responsibility we have with our images, from both a documentary and artistic perspective.
The Swedish EPA is still reviewing whether or not Helleso will be able to keep his title. Why is that even still on the table?
[H/T Gizmodo]
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 690 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 659 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 524 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 361 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 322 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 208 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 223 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Another Major Executive Order Read More- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 208 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (49)
The Bees Know
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 9:18pmThe judges were fools. Anyone in the position of deciding such an honor should be able to recognize manipulated photography.
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on September 9, 2011 at 8:57amThe purpose for taking “award” winning photos is so you can copyright the damn thing. If science is fabricating ‘evidence’ to support it’s own agenda, why can’t people whose only function is to “create” an unique image do the same thing? You can’t believe what you see or read, much of the time these days anyway and there is no going back, there is no money in that. Government can’t open its mouth without lying at any level, the media can’t be trusted, schools are literally a fascicle play on the word ‘education’. Why should ‘integrity’ in anything even be a consideration these days? It only hinders those who play by the rules or have personal honor, a distinctly miniscule statistical value?
Report Post »Scruff
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 3:53pmMy photo is unretouched, although I am bigger in real life (unless you have a really big monitor). I don’t like big cats, either.
Report Post »Black Manta
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 4:06pmWho cares..the world is on it’s way to seven years of peace…I just pray I leave when the rapture come @ that time they say Peace and Safety…Praise the Lord Jesus Christ…
Report Post »chipmunk
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 2:01pmhaha this is too funny! I‘m not an artist or photog but I’d presume the award officials know a thing or two about photography etc… guess not. what dumbies. & what a deceitful liar this guy is. btw, the lynx looks far more beautiful in the original natural stock photo. what a beautiful animal.
Report Post »shakedowncrews
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 12:07pmBwa ha ha ha haaa! Now their nature photography awards are worth as much as their Nobel Prize! NADA!!! ZILCH! NOTHING!
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on September 9, 2011 at 12:16pmActually, the Nobel prizes awarded by the Swedes are REAL — it is the Nobel peace prize (awarded by the Norwegians) that is worthless.
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 12:02pmOnce you can get PAID to urinate on a crucifix in the name of “art,“ there is NO definition of ”art” any longer. Thus, any “award” has no significance.
Once you restore credibility to the profession, via self-imposed standards, you may get my attention again. Until then? It’s all just stuff to match the sofa, or stuff to TAKE MONEY from others.
Lowering the bar ONLY degrades the art community/profession as a whole.
RAISING the bar improves the product, and the reputation of artists.
For now, THEY CHOSE to lower the bar.
Report Post »It is up to THEM to raise it again.
.
.
.
mareseatoats
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 1:20pmThat is so true. Denigrating another idea, only makes the whole purpose of Art, as a positive image in American life, completely unbelievable.
Report Post »OniKaze
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 10:30amMan, what I wouldn’t give to raise a lynx. I love big cats, and in my youth raised a bobcat. I love large cats… Wish I could raise another.
Report Post »aquablue
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 10:17amthe best picture is the stock photo. the photog’s photos are full of dead space with a little color.
Report Post »jimay
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 10:08amThis guy goes into the http://youarenotaphotographer.com/ hall of fame when it opens.
Report Post »DanWesson455
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 9:50amWhat is it with the Scandinavian Countries lately. Too much socialism. Liars and nuts running around loose.
Report Post »gsplgtr
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 9:46amNATURE NAZIS lie all the time. why are some people shocked at this? What about the Spotted Owl situation? The list goes on and on!
Report Post »LibertyWon
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 9:12amLook at all the free publicity. Maybe they picked him knowing that they could later get some PR out of the images being faked? I think they knew.
Report Post »jkendal
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 8:46am“You may be impressed too, but know this: he used stock photos and photoshop and lied.”
It’s been proven that members of the partisan media routinely do this, too…..
Report Post »ScienceIsNotEvil
Posted on September 11, 2011 at 1:21amI agree! We even had a major political figure using vicks vapor rub under his eyes so he could fake the appearance of crying for a set of publicity photos!
Report Post »Alan
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 7:31amLefties giving lefties awards. What do you expect: art and integrity?
Report Post »piper60
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 7:26amThese award committees need to do a little research before handing their awards out. Especially now in the era of photoshop.
Report Post »SShink
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 8:54amRight-on…
Report Post »I work in design and know how easy it is to visually spot or digitally find alterations in images.
What a bunch of dummies.
babylonvi
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 11:51amYea, like the Nobel Peace Prize.
Report Post »nuclearnavymom
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 6:44amSorry didn’t think the first one went…
Report Post »nuclearnavymom
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 6:42amTo quote Babs in Animal House: That boy is a P-I-G pig. LOL!
Report Post »nuclearnavymom
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 6:37amLet me be the first to say it, you’re a pig, LOL.
Report Post »creativeogre
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 4:48amOver the past few years, more and more photos in publications such as National Geographic have displayed photos that have been Photoshopped. I first noticed this back in a Katrina photo that was published, showing a flooded street… to bad the reflection of the street sign showed a different street name that the sign that was above water…
Report Post »tower7femacamp
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 5:31amyou mean something can be faked ? like 911 ?
Report Post »shirtsbyeric
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 7:07amOr both of Obama’s birth certificates?
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on September 9, 2011 at 12:18pmYes, TOWER, faked like all of that 9-11 conspiracy nonsense.
Report Post »Gypsy123
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 3:28amLiberals are nothing but 100% lie but this is preaching to the choir. They give each other awards and brag on each other. How do they make their money this is what we need to know to be effective.
Report Post »Cut off the legs to their easy chair.
Detroit paperboy
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 4:30amThe libs make thier money from grants , foundations , academia
Report Post »and welfare. Capitalism can no longer afford socialism …
loriann12
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 6:11amJust like the line from Ghostbusters: (paraphrased) You’ve never worked in the private sector, they expect results.
Report Post »LibertyWon
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 9:08amThey expect results from hard work, not cheating.
Report Post »Servant Of YHVH
Posted on September 9, 2011 at 4:46amDon’t forget that the also make money stealing it from us!
Report Post »NotPoliticallyCorrect
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 2:57amThat is utterly pathetic. Is this Al Gore’s son in law or something? LOL
Report Post »Carl1 Supports Israel
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 10:26amProbably is Al’s lying little offspring…. May have raped some Massage Therapist and paid her off to raise the little bas*** like Arnold Schwarzenegger did.
Report Post »NOT A CRAZY
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 2:32amAnother enviro-liar.
Report Post »capitalismrocks
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 1:19amMore global climate change lies… they just keep being revealed day by day…
Report Post »hogtrashhd
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 1:17amoh my.. these “art experts” are gullible.. I can barely see and the lynx sticks out like a sore thumb to my unsophisticated eyes.. I took my grandkids (10 and 6) to the art museum recently and they seen this HUGE canvas of a Jackson Pollock and asked me if a kid did it?? I said nope.. a man did it and made MILLIONS doing art like that.. they said they could do it and would be millionaires….I said they probably could.. hahahahaha..
Report Post »IreBelle
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 1:09amReminds me of a president that once won a nobel………
Report Post »Tronix
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 1:53amHonestly…..that Nobel prize is a shame not only for USA but the whole world….really. Putting aside all that Obama is and has done…..it is a real shame. But just looking that in fact is liberal prize from Sweden and Norway, and remembering the keynesian clown of Krugman……
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 10:23amBarry or Jimmy?? or both
Report Post »N37BU6
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 1:08amLOL. It was clearly shopped to begin with… how did he fool anyone?
Terrible blending, unnatural saturation and tint. Clearly 2 layers.
Report Post »UlyssesP
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 9:42amIt does look pretty lame uh? I’ve seen better photoshop work from students.
Report Post »