Politics

Bachmann Calls Out ‘Radical Environmentalists’

Bachmann:Radical Environmentalists Have Demanded that We Lock Up All Our Energy Resources

Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann claimed Saturday that the United States has more fuel resources than any other country, but blamed what she termed “radical environmentalists” for bottling up American energy policy.

With untapped oil reserves in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and off the nation’s coasts, shale oil in Western states, and rich natural gas and coal deposits, she said the U.S. “is sitting on a mother lode of treasure.”

“The United States is the number one country in the world for energy resources,” the Minnesota congresswoman told a central Florida town hall meeting, arguing that in shale deposits alone the U.S. easily outstrips the total oil supply of Saudi Arabia. “That doesn’t even include … all the oil in Alaska.”

But Bachmann said environmentalists were preventing resources from being exploited, leaving the U.S. dependent on energy imports.

“Instead of thinking we are beggars out here begging for oil and for energy, we are the king daddy dogs when it comes to energy,” she said.

“The radical environmentalists have demanded that we lock up all our energy resources,” she added. “President Bachmann will take that key out of the door. I will unlock it.”

The crowd at the upscale retirement community cheered wildly.

And Bachmann got a similar reception when she promised to eliminate the “job killing” Environmental Protection Agency, saying that she would close the agency down in a single trip. “We will turn out the lights and we’ll lock the doors,” she said.

Bachmann is in the middle of a three-day swing through Florida. Later Saturday she will address the Florida Family Policy Council, which led efforts to ban gay marriage in the state constitution.

She said she would be returning often to the state. Florida could play a key role in determining which GOP candidate faces off against President Barack Obama.

The state hasn’t set a primary date yet. But Florida officials hope to schedule it ahead of all but the four earliest voting states — Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina.

The Associated Press contributed to this article.

Comments (172)

1 2 3
  • cripplecreek
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:32pm

    She is correct. Its time to eliminate the EPA.

    Report Post »  
    • dcwu
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:45pm

      Hear! Hear!

      Report Post »  
    • Shasta
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:07pm

      Elimanate or cut the EPA, DOE, DOT, HHS, Regulation and Information, and etc. etc. etc.

      Report Post » Shasta  
    • Sheepdog911
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:26pm

      The EPA is just one more Federal agency that is beyond the constitutional bounds of the “general” (constitutional title of the “Federal”) government. Time to cut the kite string on them.

      Report Post » Sheepdog911  
    • Tear Em Up
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 10:05pm

      They should be called a more accurate description…eco-bullys. Funny how the left champions stopping school bullying but, they try to bully anyone who disagrees with their agenda…

      http://traffic.libsyn.com/mikeleeandterrymartin/Number_78_August_27th_2011.mp3

      Report Post » Tear Em Up  
    • veruca salt
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 10:30pm

      She should ban the Air Force, too, because it’s not mentioned in the Constitution.

      Report Post »  
    • chicago76
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 10:55pm

      Cheers all across the country. This agency has become a menace. Besides all the states have their own environmental agencies. Like most things government creates, what started out as a good idea has turned into a nightmare. When it dies no one will miss it.

      Report Post »  
    • psychokittis
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 10:59pm

      amen to that

      Report Post » psychokittis  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 11:43pm

      If she’d add getting the USA out of the UN and the UN out of the USA, she’d probably easily win. (She’s already pledged to stop ObamaCare, and support a Balanced Budget Amendment)

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 11:46pm

      Where does she call for the end of these useless bureaucratic agencies?
      She will not call out the Globalist’s AGENDA 21 or say she will abolish the EPA and other worthless tax draining agencies, full of over-paid, over entitled, lazy, spoiled J@ck@sses!!!
      Give me a break !!!!

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 11:52pm

      @veruca salt
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 10:30pm
      She should ban the Air Force, too, because it’s not mentioned in the Constitution
      ***
      Learn your military Vernacular, once you get so high, it’s ALL referred to as ARMY, JUST THE CONSTITUTIONAL GENERAL TITLE FOR ARMED FORCES! [I suppose under the Constitutions label of STANDING ARMY, any one sitting down should be banned, RIGHT????]

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 11:57pm

      Ok. I just saw that she claims she will eliminate the EPA.
      Nice !!!
      But….Watch the other hand. The globalists can, and will, gladly relinquish something that is not really important to them anyway, like the EPA, since that have taken power in other forms that will accomplish the same “sustainability” and earth summit agendas. the Globalists will discard the EPA to propel their minions into the top spot (President), by earning your trust, by making such a bold and daring move as to eliminate the EPA.
      I hope she is for real. I just question with boldness (:p)

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • Falsegods
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 12:01am

      USA is the king daddy dog .

      Commie pseudo enviromentalists bugger off !

      Report Post »  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 12:06am

      @ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 11:46pm
      Where does she call for the end of these useless bureaucratic agencies?
      She will not call out the Globalist’s AGENDA 21 or say she will abolish the EPA and other worthless tax draining agencies, full of over-paid, over entitled, lazy, spoiled J@ck@sses!!!
      Give me a break !!!!
      ***
      Didn’t you read the article, she just pledged to end the EPA?:
      “And Bachmann got a similar reception when she promised to eliminate the “job killing” Environmental Protection Agency, saying that she would close the agency down in a single trip. “We will turn out the lights and we’ll lock the doors,” she said.”
      Can’t get any more specific than that!!!

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • jzs
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 3:18am

      Yes, let’s get rid of the EPA. I long for the day when large cities were covered with permanent smog, blotting out the sky and sun, where simply living and breathing there is equivilant of smoking a pack of cigarettes a day. Yes, those were the good old days, when rivers occasionally caught fire from all the solvents dumped in them by chemical companies and the fish you caught there were inedible from the mercury in their tissue. Yes, when our kids got cancer from the carcinogens in the drinking water – how we all miss that! Why shouldn’t our cities smell like chemicals and petroleum? Who care if we can no longer swim at the beaches because the water is toxic and filled with garbage?

      Companies the country over could save money if they could simply spew sulpher into the atmosphere (nothing better than acid rain!), and dump toxins into the land, sea and air. The rich, who can afford to live somewhere else, will be making more money! Who cares if cities are unlivable for the rest of us?

      Report Post » jzs  
    • one years food ration like glenn says
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 7:54am

      she promised to eliminate the “job killing” Environmental Protection Agency, saying that she would close the agency down in a single trip. “We will turn out the lights and we’ll lock the doors,”
      WOW !! I love that statement and Mrs. Bachmann…

      Report Post » one years food ration like glenn says  
    • one years food ration like glenn says
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 8:00am

      @JZS… Stop with the scare tactics .. They don’t work anymore, fool.. We ALL know the truth ..

      Report Post » one years food ration like glenn says  
    • veruca salt
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 8:26am

      Military Mom,

      I’ll study up on my military vernacular as long as you agree to study up on your knowledge of the Constitution. Article II, Section 2 to narrow it down for you.

      “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.”

      Report Post »  
    • SpeckChaser
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 12:10pm

      @JZS-Bravo, your “tactics” never disappoint.

      JZS said all of the following.

      “permanent smog… blotting out the sky and sun… equivalent of smoking a pack of cigarettes a day… rivers occasionally caught fire… fish you caught there were inedible from the mercury…kids got cancer from the carcinogens in the drinking water …no longer swim at the beaches because the water is toxic and filled with garbage…spew sulpher into the atmosphere…acid rain…toxins into the land, sea and air… who cares if cities are unlivable for the rest of us?”

      Rules for radicals: Rule Nine – “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

      Disagree with any of the “Beck like” prophecies and watch JZS apply rule five.

      Rules for radicals: Rule Five – “Ridicule is a man’s most potent weapon.”

      Also, it’s been about a month and 11 or so requests but I would still like to know what liberal principles you have applied to your personal life and reaped the benefits. Thanks. As always, if no response I‘ll assume you didn’t see this post, not that your ducking the question.

      Report Post » SpeckChaser  
    • jzs
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 1:20pm

      Hi Speck, I just left China. I didn’t see the sun or a patch of blue sky in my one week there, all thanks to coal burning for energy production. Extreme? Scare tactics? Read this about the Cuyahoga river, which has caught fire 13 times in the last 100 years or so, thanks to pollution: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuyahoga_River. Google the word “smog” and read about how cities like Denver and LA were blanketed by a permanent haze before the EPA stepped in an regulated emissions(did I mention lead – a neurotoxin, brain damage – before lead gasoline was banned?).

      You must be young. My post wasn’t a scare tactic, I was only referencing US history. I wasn’t making a prediction, I was talking about the effect of pollution that the US has already experienced. Ironic, too, that a Glenn Beck fan would be critical of an alarmist post. Glenn make his living preaching an alarmist, apocalyptic worldview.

      Didn’t I answer your question about my liberal philosophy and personal life? I thought I did. Okay, here’s a starter. “Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor.” Luke 18:18-22. “Do not look to your own interests, but let each of you look to the interest of others” Phil 2:2-5. “Whoever has the world’s goods and beholds his brother in need and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God abide in him?” 1 John 3:17

      Report Post » jzs  
    • SpeckChaser
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 4:11pm

      Hi brother JZS,hope you had a safe trip.

      You must be old, if your profile pic is you and not father time from a google image search. I don’t see what age has to do with anything, unless you’re an ageist, then I get it.

      The liberal argument seems to be we can’t reign in wasteful government spending or unelected government agencies who continue to amass more unnecessary power. Liberals believe ANY attempt to get on the right track would result in acid rain or pushing g-ma over a cliff. Call it what you will, I will call them scare tactics. I can see your side of not wanting to do away with the EPA completely and I apologize if you agree they have overstepped their authority.

      About me being critical of an alarmist post, you missed the point. As one who bashes beck as a fear monger, it was a bit hypocritical of you to invoke acid rain and toxic beaches.

      Bible verses are nice but you didn’t answer the question. Give examples from your life. Tell how you sold every possession you own (minus you computer) and gave to the poor or how you put the interests of your conservative brothers and sisters before your liberal interests.

      I pre-apologize because I know you dislike referencing a topic from other articles, but please inform me on the number limit that the second amendment places on firearms? If it’s not a problem, send me the wiki link discussing the people’s right to keep and bear arms up until and not over a quantity of x amount.

      Report Post » SpeckChaser  
    • FyreFury
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 6:49pm

      Right on!

      Report Post » FyreFury  
    • 4truth2all
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 8:12pm

      Yo Veruca Salt:
      When was the constitution written ?
      When were planes invented ?

      Report Post »  
    • jzs
      Posted on August 29, 2011 at 4:19am

      Hey Spec. Yep, I’m safely in the Netherlands now. The avatar isn’t me, it‘s Emmanual Goldstein from the Orwell’s book 1984 (movie in the case of the image). He was the character, invented by the Party actually, who was the object of the daily “two minutes of hate.” I thought it appropriate for this website.

      Maybe my post about the second amendment didn’t post. Here is: My copy of the Constitution says says, “A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” Is that what yours says too? My dictionary says “arms” is synonymous with “weapon.”

      Like much of the Constitution that phrase is subject to interpretation. Does it mean I have the right to have nuclear arms? Should I assert my Second Amendment Constitutional right to possess surface to air missles? Hand grenades? Flame throwers or a bazooka? Chemical weapons?

      Of course not, there are limits that have to be based on reason. That‘s why you can’t legally buy a nuclear bomb, even if you had money. You’re correct, the Constitution doesn’t limit the number of guns you can own. If you want to believe that those eight AK 47s being sold over and over to the same person are for protection of a family of eight, well, okay. Believe it if you want.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • veruca salt
      Posted on August 29, 2011 at 6:13am

      4Truth,

      Good job keeping up with the logic… So using the same argument:

      When was the Constitution written?
      When was the EPA established?

      Report Post »  
    • bboatmanable
      Posted on August 29, 2011 at 11:29am

      @ VERUCA SALT

      You’re an idiot. If you’re going to try to make a point, at least use one that makes sense. The E.P.A. and the like are very useless entities as they are now used, and do nothing but waste money. While the Air Force (if allowed to continue advancing) is the most successful fighting organization to ever exist on the face of the planet and is clearly necessary for National Security. What a joke!

      Report Post » bboatmanable  
    • Jaycen
      Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:41pm

      @veruca salt

      National defense, which is a function of the Air Force, is one of the things spelled out in the Constitution for which the Federal Government has a direct responsibility: Article I, Section 8.

      The EPA, who’s function is dubious, is administered by appointed bureaucrats who are not elected by The People. Yet the regulations that come from the EPA are enforced as if they had the weight of legislated laws.

      You probably haven’t read the Constitution, so I understand why you’re so easily confused. Try educating yourself before trying to make waves with blatantly stupid statements.

      Regards.

      Report Post » Jaycen  
    • Jaycen
      Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:45pm

      @jzs

      Do you guys just copy/paste your talking points? I’ve seen your comment posted word-for-word all over the internet.

      Were you even alive when those things were true? Do you believe those statements were true in every corner of the country? I’m just asking the question, I‘m not trying to insinuate that you don’t have a clue whether or not people “choked on smog” in every city, or if every creek and river ran brown with human fecal matter.

      I mean, obviously that happened, right? A blog told you it did, so there’s really no need to go any further with your research, is there?

      Report Post » Jaycen  
    • Jaycen
      Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:51pm

      JZS lied:

      “Posted on August 28, 2011 at 1:20pm
      Hi Speck, I just left China. I didn’t see the sun or a patch of blue sky in my one week there, all thanks to coal burning for energy production.”

      I’ve been to Nanjing a couple times, Shanghai, and Zhouh Zhang. I saw some browning in Nanjing, but it sits in a giant bowl of mountains. You can see that clearly while standing in any tall building in the city. It’s not hard to understand why that particular geographic region would struggle with smog.

      In Shanghai, I noticed very little air polution.

      Listen, I appreciate that you have a political agenda that includes complete control of all other human beings. I really do. I’d just like you to be honest, that’s all.

      Report Post » Jaycen  
    • Jaycen
      Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:01pm

      JZS incorrectly states:

      “Posted on August 29, 2011 at 4:19am
      Hey Spec. Yep, I’m safely in the Netherlands now. The avatar isn’t me, it‘s Emmanual Goldstein from the Orwell’s book 1984 (movie in the case of the image). He was the character, invented by the Party actually, who was the object of the daily “two minutes of hate.” I thought it appropriate for this website.”

      Goldstein was not “invented by the Party”. In the book, he lived and was indeed an early “subversive” to the Party. The lie was that he was still free and causing mischeif for the State. The reality was he’d already been broken and turned into an unperson by the time the central character came along.

      Assuming you ever read the book, go back and re-read it. You’ll probably see a lot of yourself in the Party members. Your speech and logic remind me very much of the people who know the Party is wrong, but will do anything to maintain the status quo.

      Hey, at least you know you “belong”. Good for you!

      Report Post » Jaycen  
  • Uechi
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:14pm

    Michelle according the Global Waming Guru Al Gore you are a racist. Shame on you for having half a brain and not being an inspid little JO crook like Al baby.

    Report Post »  
    • IntransigentMind
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:19pm

      While she’s at it, she should call out the crony capitalists, too:
      http://markamerica.com/2011/08/27/this-is-a-no-crony-capitalists-zone/

      Report Post »  
    • one years food ration like glenn says
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 7:56am

      @VERUCA SALT.. good idea and ban liberalism too ..You do know it’s a disease , right ?

      Report Post » one years food ration like glenn says  
    • John 3:16
      Posted on August 29, 2011 at 9:46am

      JZS. You quote bible verses as if you are a believer in God, the creator of this universe, if you are not a believer why do you quote something that is non-sense to you? I can tell you, man does not and never will be in control of our environment on planet earth or any where else except maybe in very limited ways. For instance what control did Al Goredo and the environmentalists have over the earth quake in Virginia? If we had two or more major volcanos errupt or a large meteor collision with earth we could easily move into a new form of ice age, what control does the envirmrntalist man have there? Not too much, nevertheless, we might be in a little better position if we had lots of cheap energy to warm our homes. God expects us to trust in Him not Al Goredo: This should be clear to anyone who quotes the Bible. Going on from there, if you travel as much as you say, you appear to be one of the contributors,like Al Gordo, of polluting this environment so why is it you don’t protect the environment by getting a job just down the street from your home and ride a bike to work? Liberals can be so hypocritical eg. Al Gordo and our beloved president Barak, the puppet, Obama. The GOD who created this universe will control it to meet His ends and for the leaders of the environmentalists wackos, they are just in it for the money.

      Report Post » John 3:16  
  • kandeman
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:11pm

    Americans do not generally elect members of congress.
    Senator J F Kennedy’s election was bought and paid for by dad and the Chicago machine.
    Senator B H Obama’s election was bought and paid for by who knows who, the media and the Chicago machine.
    I love Michelle Bachmann and would vote for her, just not sure she can sway the electorate who do not pay attention to politics but for one month every four years.
    If the media were the least bit impartial she would trounce Barry.

    Report Post »  
    • Dr Vel
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:37pm

      “If the media were the least bit impartial she would trounce Barry.”

      Which is why if we regain control laws should be created making it a felony to knowingly mislead the American public while purporting it to be factual news in support of any agenda in any form.

      Report Post »  
    • HumbleMan
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 3:07am

      The world would be a better place if we could move Chicago to the Antarctic.

      Report Post » HumbleMan  
  • capitalismrocks
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:09pm

    This is why the next GOP President needs to declare all US Energy Resources are protected under National Security and basically block and prevent Environmentalists from meddling with US Energy access and production and they can then in their frustration all pack up and move to South America and go protest the stripping of the Rain Forests and stay the heck out of the US and stop interfering with our ability to produce extremely cheap, ridiculously abundant energy, completely cut off ALL foreign imports, any surplus the US produces is NOT to be allowed to be sold, but is to be stored for strategic economic and national stability… .completely shut down ALL funds to the Middle East and S. America from the United States, then those countries can no longer dictate ANY policy to the United States and when we need to do any kind of diplomatic or military intervention to help countries, we won’t be in a stranglehold by those we used to buy energy from…

    Domestic energy, even if it takes 2-3 years to get into the pipeline will still begin to impact economic and job growth in this country because businesses and people will see the light at the end of the tunnel.

    Report Post » capitalismrocks  
    • lemmingsrnotusdamnit
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 10:51pm

      That’s very true. It’s the single most effective thing the government can do to get the economy moving. It must be done if we want to avoid an economic meltdown.

      Report Post » lemmingsrnotusdamnit  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 12:22am

      capitalismrocks
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:09pm
      This is why the next GOP President needs to declare all US Energy Resources are protected under National Security and basically block and prevent Environmentalists from meddling with US Energy access and production and they can then in their frustration all pack up and move to South America and go protest the stripping of the Rain Forests and stay the heck out of the US and stop interfering with our ability to produce extremely cheap, ridiculously abundant energy
      ****
      The problem with that is the next time we get progressive Pres. He/she will put it under UN control with ALL OUR LOW SULFUR COAL! Nationalizing anything takes Private Property rights away from all of us!

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
  • timej31
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:01pm

    Exactly what we need!! Ignore the wackos they’re flat earthers as well. Get people to work drilling and building power plants that burn gas, coal and nuke.

    Report Post » timej31  
    • Living In NYC
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 11:47am

      TimeJ31

      You are so right..now we have the coal burning Chey Volt! Time to get the nukes / coal generators grinding out power, the independent oil guys drilling and the big oil dudes refining!

      Get rid of the Department of Energy, the EPA and Department of Education!

      Report Post » Living In NYC  
  • The Third Archon
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:55pm

    “And Bachmann got a similar reception when she promised to eliminate the “job killing” Environmental Protection Agency, saying that she would close the agency down in a single trip. “We will turn out the lights and we’ll lock the doors,” she said.”
    Because it‘s easier to just shut it down if you don’t understand the job that it does.

    Report Post » The Third Archon  
    • crabbyoldman
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:43pm

      The EPA is needed. But not the obama “Control EPA”.

      Report Post »  
    • TSUNAMI-22
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:01pm

      How did the USA manage without the EPA before Jimmy “Welfare state” Carter imposed the agency upon us?

      We don’t need it, never did. It only serves as a weapon to be wielded like a knife by liberal government to impose unjustified costs upon the American people under the guise of “environmental protection”.

      It’s a phony agency, in my opinion.

      Report Post »  
    • veruca salt
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 10:29pm

      Do a quick google search on the EPA and in about three seconds, you’ll find out Jimmy Carter did not impose the EPA on the nation. But, if it makes you feel better to blame a Democrat instead of the Republican who did start it, then don’t look. Just know you won’t be seeking the truth in teh manner Glenn commands us to do.

      Report Post »  
    • chicago76
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 11:00pm

      The EPA is not needed. There will always be obamas and bureaucrats to abuse their power. Next time it might be worse. Shut it down. Take away the laws that created it. And make sure it never is created again.

      Report Post »  
    • henryKnox
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 11:17pm

      You are right, she hasn’t explained what the EPA does. We know that the first thing the EPA did was to pass regulations that are responsible for millions of deaths. The EPA eliminated a good chemical for controlling mosquitoes and Malaria without any proof that it was harmful to humans. Now the EPA is responsible for millions of dead children in Africa. Also, say hello to bed bugs, thanks to the EPA.

      Report Post » henryKnox  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 12:16am

      @The Third Archon
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:55pm
      “And Bachmann got a similar reception when she promised to eliminate the “job killing” Environmental Protection Agency, saying that she would close the agency down in a single trip. “We will turn out the lights and we’ll lock the doors,” she said.”
      Because it‘s easier to just shut it down if you don’t understand the job that it does
      ***
      It may have had a Very Good Goal when Nixon started it, but with all things government, which have very little accountability: It’s job of late has been entirely consuming all things productive in this country!

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • TSUNAMI-22
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 2:56am

      @ Varuca salt

      You’re correct, it wasn’t Carter….it was Nixon. They were both a-holez besides. Carter signed in the community reinvestment act which ultimately forced banks to lend money to people that couldn’t pay it back.

      I stand corrected.

      Report Post »  
    • veruca salt
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 10:09am

      No worries, sir. You’ll keep me honest sometime in the future :-)

      Report Post »  
  • The Third Archon
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:53pm

    “The crowd at the upscale retirement community cheered wildly.”
    Which is 100% unsurprising.

    Report Post » The Third Archon  
  • The Third Archon
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:52pm

    “Instead of thinking we are beggars out here begging for oil and for energy”
    You know we could ALSO, build a network of nuclear power plants, wind turbines (probably near Detroit, it could use the jobs), and photovaltaic solar arrays (probably near Arizona) and achieve the same energy independence, but it would also be mostly fuel free as well (the wind and solar generators requiring only maintenance and replacement to generate energy, while the nuclear generators would require a small amount of fuel every once in a great while). Incidentally, this would ALSO reduce a lot of the carbon dioxide generation of the economy simultaneously. In fact, we could ALSO use hyrdoelectric, geothermal, and wave-buoy generators to achieve the same thing, in tandem or substitution with any of the aforementioned sources, and still achieve the same plans. The difference between my plan, and Michelle Bachmann’s, is that my energy infrastructure doesn’t exponentially increase in fuel supply costs over the next half-a-century.

    Report Post » The Third Archon  
    • Stoic one
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:57pm

      you also forgot the up front costs of your non carbon energy…

      Report Post » Stoic one  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:08pm

      They tried green energy in Spain it got them 25% unemployment so yeah we need more of that.It doesn’t work but Barry will be more than happy to keep us on the wrong track.We get to drive our electric car’s powered by evil coal for forty miles then to recharge it takes four hours,people won‘t buy them it’s just too inconvenient.

      Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • Boojer56
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:34pm

      That would be really swell but the technology just isnt there. I looked into Solar about a year ago and I was told to go completly off of the grid I would need to cover the entire roof and and three times my backyard in solar panels, And I live in the Sunshine state. Do you remember all of the whining about the birds that were killed by the wind farms. Now you have to deal with PETA
      we should go nuclear its the most efficient. We have learned from Japan to put the emergency generators on top of the buildings not ground level

      Report Post »  
    • toto
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 10:17pm

      The wind farms and large scale solar facilities are uber ugly, have incredibly large footprints and produce miniscule amounts of energy. True environmentalists would be outrages at the insult to the landscape. The environmentalists who support this stuff are kool-aid drinkers that couldn’t analyze they way out of a paper bag

      Report Post »  
    • henryKnox
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 11:37pm

      Unfortunately, the environmentalists oppose your plan also. They would not allow the Nuclear plants or the Dams necessary for the hydroelectric power generation. They are already opposing windmills and solar arrays, claiming that they harm birds and wildlife. The only way for us to succeed is to ignore the environmentalists completely. That is the only way they will allow civilization to continue.

      Report Post » henryKnox  
    • NOTYERHUCKLEBERRY
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 12:46am

      I am going to give you a clue. Out of all your green crap, the only one that is truly “green” is the nuke plant. Here is why: Wind power only works when the wind is blowing. Solar panels only work when the sun is shining. When these things aren’t happening or, just in case they quit, there is a coal fired plant on line to make up for the power loss. Your green power isn’t as green as you would like to think it is.
      As to the nuke plant. In the long run, it is the cheapest and safest way or producing electricity. The way we build reactors, the chance of a breach is next to non existent. If you have a copy of “The China Syndrome”, toss it in the garbage.
      Remember this: When the Three Mile accident happened, no one died, the vessel did not rupture and the whole thing lasted better than the projections had said it would.

      Report Post »  
  • FORLORNHOPE
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:50pm

    “the king daddy dogs” haha she just made that up,

    Report Post »  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:40pm

    Radical enviormentalists, eco-fanatics and terrorists plus the Progressive-socialists of the admin, of which Obama is the chief instigator and terror master of the war on Americas freedoms; each one is the joint cause of our energy policies being hamstrung and tied up to where we are dependant on so much foreign oil and gas coming into the nation.

    Bleed us dry financially, slowly and steadily, while tying us up with so many regulations upon more regulations until everything comes down in a massive collapse.

    Mr Obamas greatest dream this would be, and it is the nightmare the people of America need to stand against.

    Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • omni
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:27pm

      Libs don’t seem to be able to look at green energy from a practical standpoint. If you count the subsidies required to get windmills and solar off the ground, the cost per KWH is at least double that of coal, nuclear, Hydro or natural gas. Of course we need to continue work on green concepts but not by buying into large scale energy schemes that make rates permanently skyrocket. Our fragile economy can’t stand another negative shock.

      Report Post »  
  • sweathog1948
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:34pm

    Bachmann is so right on about the radical environmentalists. When the environmentalist first started they were good and well needed. They have totally gone to far about our natural resourses dealing with energy. Balance is what is needed with our resources and the environmentalist will not listen to logic, that will bring us the energy we needed and still protect our enviroment.

    We so need a president that can bring us the energy we need, that we can get out of our own country, and not be paying high prices that the oil cartel are asking and getting for their oil. This would bring in so many jobs and give us the energy we need.

    None of the other canadats have even come close with an answer to our energy problem, as Bachmann has. It is time we elect a president that will work for the good of our country and also provide jobs that are needed.

    Report Post »  
    • avenger
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:52pm

      about time some one had the balls…love you Michelle !

      Report Post »  
    • Mimi24
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 12:39am

      Ookspay, does your Mama know you are out this late?

      Report Post »  
    • Stopit
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 5:21pm

      Agree with Michelle 100%. Balance is required. Unfortunately, having worked in environmental enforcement, balance is the exception. Most are radical and heavily biased with no conscience about these things as it affects their day to day judgments. I got out of that career because being even handed and fair brought on persecution from the radicals both inside and outside…though I reaped greater actual results in emissions reductions and accuracy. Even now USAJOBS begins its EPA position opening annoucements with “where every day is earth day” (ie you‘ve got to be a nature worshipping radical or they don’t want you.) It’s the only place where bias in JUDGMENT is prerequisite for employment. Add to that the elite socialists/communists (as Carol Browner) use of it as a tool for productivity reductions and global redistribution of wealth and you’ve got one mean apparatus against free Americans and the economy.

      The whole Agency needs to be scraped. States can regulate what needs to be regulated more efficiently, with a heavier dependance on civil suits when life or property is impacted. And by all means balanced individuals must be employed when needed.

      Report Post »  
    • Ookspay
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 6:45pm

      @Mimi24 “Ookspay, does your Mama know you are out this late?” Sorry Mimi, I snuck a couple of my Mom’s wine coolers and got a little randy.

      Report Post » Ookspay  
  • ENDtheFED2012
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:34pm

    When I look at Bachmann all I see is an ex-IRS tax lawyer who lived on a socialist farming community that voted for the Patriot Act not once but twice. She will bend over for Global Governance just like Perry, Romney, Cain , and Palin will.
    She is just another CONTROL FREAK that wants to control the lives of Americans and American business.
    And tell Bachman to stop jocking the Tea Party that Ron Paul and his supporters started. Let her start her own movement.

    Report Post » ENDtheFED2012  
    • georgiavietvet
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:47pm

      you are entitled to your opinion,but i think you are wrong. she will be an excellent potus.

      Report Post »  
    • patbarker
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:57pm

      spoken like a true Ron Paul fringer….

      Report Post »  
    • ENDtheFED2012
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:01pm

      It’s not my opinion that she lived on a socialist farming community…she really did.
      It’s not my opinion that she was an IRS tax lawyer…….she really was one.
      It’s not my opinion that she voted twice for the Patriot Act……..it’s on Congressional record.

      And do you know what the funny part is? Bachmann is the one that wanted the US Constitution read to Congress but yet voted against the 4th Amendment twice.
      Bachmann was also the one that started the Tea Party caucus……you know the same caucus that Dr. Paul (the one who started the modern Tea Party Movement in 2007) won’t join.
      Bachmann is trying to jock Paul……not cool.

      Proof that Dr. Ron Paul and his supporters started the modern Tea Party Movement on Dec. 16, 2007=>
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bNiDx7qTjA

      Report Post » ENDtheFED2012  
    • avenger
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:12pm

      aha..so vote for obummer again !

      Report Post »  
    • ENDtheFED2012
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:21pm

      @avenger
      I didn’t vote for him in the first place Neo-Lib / Neo-Con.
      I voted for Dr. Paul in 2008.

      Nice try though but you fail yet again.

      Report Post » ENDtheFED2012  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:34pm

      Yes, and you still don’t get it! Ron Paul would lose again.

      Report Post »  
    • bikerr
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:02pm

      @ENDtheFED2012
      Dr Paul.? what a wasted vote. Thanks for letting this well “oiled” machine(nation) come to a grinding halt”

      Report Post »  
    • Shasta
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:13pm

      “Ron Paul and his supporters started the Tea Party”? That is like Al Gore claiming to have created the Internet. Ron Paul has some good economic views, but as a seperatist, he has terrible foreign policy views. He is ok with Iran having nukes! We don’t live in a world where we can have such views any more. Ron Paul will NOT get the republican nomination. So he will run as an independant. He has great supporters, which means that Obummer WILL have a second term, and we all loose.

      Report Post » Shasta  
    • ENDtheFED2012
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:42pm

      @BIKEER
      What are you talking about….Dr. Paul is ahead in all the polls.
      Nobody know about Dr. Paul in 2008, now Dr. Paul is is known throughout the world. It it only took 3 years.

      @SHASTA
      Yes….Dr. Paul and his supporters did start the modern day Tea Party movement back on Dec. 16, 2007, the anniversary of the Boston Tea Party of Dec. 16, 1773. Just watch the video link I posted for proof or just YouTube “Ron Paul Tea Party” and note the up-load dates on the vids.
      The only way Obama is gonna get another term is if the Neo-Libs a.k.a. Neo-Cons a.k.a. undercover progressives push Perry, Bachmann, Cain, or Palin (if she runs).
      But even then if Dr. Paul runs as an independent He would still get enough votes to win. (read my post below this)
      Remember this, and this goes to all the Neo-Libs/Neo-Cons, this is the 2012 election not the 2008 election and people don’t use MSM anymore and Dr. Paul is king of the alternative media.

      Report Post » ENDtheFED2012  
  • ExTex
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:33pm

    Tough talk from the pint-sized candidate. Any talk of shutting down the EPA gets me perked up and on that bandwagon. That’s an “idea” worth listening to. Uh, buuuuuttttt…….I don‘t think she’s gonna get the chance to fufill that promise. The “machine” that is the GOP will never allow it. Too many progressives in the party. It’s tainted and has lost any credibility it ever had. It gets more and more difficult to discern between sincere platforms v.s. grandstanding platitudes from would-be candidates. Anytime someone is down in the polls, they feel they have to make some grand public statement to get the media buzzing about them again. You know…politics as usual.

    The real question is….who can you really trust to follow through with their ideas? And, can they even get enough cooperation from Congress to pull any of these more radical ideas off? Can we really trust Romney or Perry? I doubt it. They’re the the two with the best resumes, but are what’s wrong with Washington today. Career politicians with RINO skin. Can we trust Bachmann, Paul, or Cain? More likely, but they’ll get far less cooperation from those needed to push their agenda.

    The “Damocles Sword” is when either, Perry or Romney gets the GOP bid and one of the Tea Party candidates run on an Independant ticket and split the Conservative and Independant vote. With fear of another 4 yrs of stinkin’ BO most will vote for the GOP guy, and the Tea Party and Liberatarians will vote

    Report Post » ExTex  
    • ENDtheFED2012
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:50pm

      Don’t worry about that.
      If Dr. Paul ran as an independent he would still win.
      About 50% of republicans are fed up with the GOP establishment status quo and back Dr. Paul.
      About 50% of Dems are fed up with Obama and the Dem establishment status quo and back Dr. Paul.
      About 60-70% of Independents are fed up with the GOP and DEM establishment status quo and back Dr. Paul.
      That is more then enough to win the election.

      In fact did you know that when Dr. paul started the Tea party back in 2007 he had a 35-40% democratic base at his rallies?
      That’s the best thing about Paul, He can pull in Republican, Democrat, and Independent voters. Just look at how his popularity has grown in just the past 4 years without much media coverage.

      Obama doesn’t stand a chance against Dr. Paul in the election.

      Report Post » ENDtheFED2012  
    • babylonvi
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:39pm

      Whether Romney, Perry or another Neocon Globalist gets the nomination is no different than if Obummer gets re-elected, they will both continue to sell us down the river to the Globalists, NWO and UN. The fix is in and they know it. Why don’t you think they have not eliminated the likes of Beck, Alex Jones, etc? Because they have the fix in(why do you think they rushed to computer voting so the PROGRAM decides who wins) so it matters not what party is elected. We woke up too late. The only chance to slow this down is to have the House and Senate controlled by conservatives who are willing to zeor out the funding for the likes of EPA, Energy, Education and DHS and TSA plus be willing to shut down the Govt. when the POTUS won’t sign the appropriations bill(which will save even more money).

      Report Post » babylonvi  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:48pm

      Do not count out the Fair Lady from Alaska. If and when she decides to jump on, and it is beginning to look that she may well do such soon, and if she is able to navigate the troubled waters of the primary election process, and it will not be with the slimy hands of the RINO’s and progressives within the Republican Party, she will generate a ground swell that will carry her into and through to victory. the liberal loons of the Democratic Party fear her more than any other candidate.
      She has the gumption, strength, character and integrity to do what needs to be done when it needs to be done, and the American people will support her.
      Moreover, if the Force is with her, and I believe He is. there will be nothing that can stop her, for their is nothing that can stop Him.
      Stand back and marvel, for I believe the time is at hand.

      Report Post »  
    • ENDtheFED2012
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:07pm

      @carbonyes
      I just hope she would make Dr. Paul her VP so this way when she quits after about 2 years or so a real President can take over and run things right.
      .
      lololol
      If Palin got the GOP nom. she would really hand over 4 more years to Obama and that is a FACT.

      The only one that can beat Obama is Dr. Paul. Just look at his numbers in the polls.
      Look at the Rasmussen moch election poll ‘Election 2012 Match-Up’…Obama=42%__Paul=41%__other candidate=11%__undecided=6%
      And that poll was taken back in 2010. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvEa3498L_I

      If you wanna beat Obama and get the commies out of the White House in 2012 get behind and vote for Dr. Ron Paul.

      Report Post » ENDtheFED2012  
    • indyblueyes
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 12:17am

      ENDTHEFED2012……….. Dr. Paul is that you?

      Report Post »  
    • GETLIFE
      Posted on August 28, 2011 at 2:53am

      I don’t know, INDYBLUEYES, maybe he‘s not answering because you didn’t use “Dr.” enough in your post….

      Report Post » GETLIFE  
  • ProbIemSoIver
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:28pm

    Even if she didn’t sign the unconstitutional Patriot act, which would render her a Neo-Con and NOT a TEA Party Patriot, I don’t want anyone representing me, that uses terminology such as “king daddy dogs”!

    Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:56pm

      Neo-Con Neo-Con Neo-Con Neo-Con Neo-Con Neo-Con Neo-Con Neo-Con Neo-Con
      Ron Paul Voted NO on military border patrols to battle drugs & terrorism. (Sep 2001)
      Libro-Con

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:27pm

      A Neo-con means that one believes in “spreading democracy” around the world using military force. They endorse the Military / Industrial Complex. That is exactly why he didn’t want them at the border. They are to provide for the common Defense. Not OFFENSE !!!!
      They are to protect us from real military threats from abroad !!!
      Not to patrol the border for the Mexican Family Circus.
      WE HAVE the BORDER PATROL for that !!!!

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:39pm

      libertarians are actually just social liberals who don’t want any of their money used to fund the natural consequences of a socially liberal society. They pretend to be conservatives, when all they really are is money conscious liberals with an isolationist view of the world they live in.

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:17pm

      @ REPUBLICORP
      keep telling yourself that. lol.

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
  • truthseekerusa
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:21pm

    Waiting for Brachmann and other candidates to put their solutions–exactly what they intend to do, step by step–, in writing instead of crowd-pleasing orations. They all talk the talk, but when they get into office, don’t walk the walk. Any one seen a specific plan by Brachmann?

    Report Post »  
    • truthseekerusa
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:23pm

      Sorry about the typos–Bachmann

      Report Post »  
    • qpwillie
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:56pm

      I hope neither Bachmann or the other candidates want to stand by and let Iran build an arsenal of nuclear weapons. That would be just plain irresponsible.

      Report Post » qpwillie  
    • ENDtheFED2012
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:18pm

      @qpwillie
      I want to know if you have any guns!

      I believe you to be a future threat to me so therefore you must hand over all of your guns and not plan on buying / making any guns for yourself either.
      If you do not comply with my orders I will have an armed force invade your home to find them and turn them over to me. For your sake I hope you do not resist, I do not want to level your home and have my contractor friends rebuild it at your expense.
      Now I do not care if you believe you have some kind of “right” to own these weapons, you are a future threat and you must disarm yourself for my piece of mind.

      Do you understand what I am trying to say here Neo-Lib a.k.a. Neo-Con a.k.a. undercover Progressive?

      Report Post » ENDtheFED2012  
    • qpwillie
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:36pm

      ENDtheFED2012,
      Unlike Iran, I haven’t vowed to wipe anybody off the map. I also don’t believe my God wants me to do so for no other reason than they have a different religion. If I did, I wouldn‘t have the same rights to have weapons as somebody who didn’t feel that way.

      Your scenario is totally bogus.

      .

      Report Post » qpwillie  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:43pm

      QP willie. Where does it state that the U.S. has the Authority to Govern sovereign Nations?
      I will give you all the time in the world. use google, wikipedia, or what ever resource you want.
      get back to us here @ the BLAZE with a post. We would love to see it.
      Israel CAN and WILL take care of itself. Also, N.A.T.O. is in charge of all the middle-east relations.
      It doesn’t matter what our “politicians” think. The Military / Industrial Complex has a plan. First and foremost; War shall never end. The “politicians” you tout here on the BLAZE actually work for the MIC. Hopefully, soon you will wake up and see the truth !!!

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:05pm

      I will try and make this as succinct as possible.
      Image for a moment we were not a military super power, but a peaceful economic power.
      China was the Superpower and picked on ALL world nations, especially capitalist nations.
      They go around the world “spreading Communism” for the common good. Rescuing the poor socialists from the evil capitalists;People like you and I, that work for what we earn, and expect to keep what we earn.
      So, in 1953 they invade and throw our capitalist politicians out and replace with Communist ones.
      We are now a communist Nation. They leave.
      Over the years we slowly become capitalist again.
      Many still hate China, and hold a grudge. 100 “terrorist” Americans Plot and carry out an attack on Hong-Kong, killing thousands.
      China Invades America again, looking for a small % of a “radical” group. Everyone in America now pays for the deeds of a small %.
      While they are here they once again “spread Communism” since they believe that is superior to capitalism or freedom.
      They stay for over 10 years in America because a small % of “radicals” (patriots).
      They have NO deadline to leave !!! They are here for over 10 years because they make $ from their “citizens”(slaves) to give to their friends in high places that have companies involved in lucrative Government Military Contracts !!!
      WAR = $ for companies involved !
      Companies = Your “politicians” constituents (Democrat AND Republican)
      GET IT YET ????

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • qpwillie
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:14pm

      ProbIemSoIver,
      I hope you don’t think Israel is the only ones that Iran has vowed to exterminate,

      All nations are NOT equal.

      GET IT YET ????

      Report Post » qpwillie  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:17pm

      Anyone seen one from Barry?? Anyone seen a DEMOCRAT BUDGET???? Why do R’s or Conservatives have to spell out every F/N last detail on what they would do?? DEMOCRATS Never spell out anything , they have to pass the Unseen bill, before you can find out what’s in it.

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:24pm

      Nice intellectual retort.
      Yeah, I get it.
      You are beyond hope.

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • qpwillie
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:49pm

      You Paulies go ahead and help Obama by attempting to destroy ANYBODY who actually might be his opponent. I’ll be voting for ABO. I believe we‘re the majority and we’ll get him out of there and undo the damage he has done.

      Report Post » qpwillie  
  • progressiveslayer
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:20pm

    The EPA doesn‘t care about the environment it’s sole purpose is to control the private sector through mindless and costly regulation.How did this country survive before the EPA with it’s draconian policies were inflicted on the private sector? Abolish the unconstitutional EPA vote out our marxist president and you’ll see the economy take off like a rocket.

    These wacko environmentalists value a fish or lizard over oil production,it’s asinine and making energy cost more than it should.

    Report Post » progressiveslayer  
  • Joisey
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:19pm

    Michelle Bachmann is exactly right about the enviro-whackos.

    Report Post » Joisey  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:14pm

      lol. Oh boy. Michele Bachmann works for the “environmentalists”. You have a lot to learn. She is just an actress putting on a show. Lets see if she makes it all the way down to the bottom of the “environmental” rabbit hole and denounces AGENDA 21 and name-drops the Global Elite behind it !!!
      Then I will be impressed !!!!

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • bikerr
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 10:25pm

      @ProbIemSoIver—–Michele Bachmann works for the “environmentalists”.?—–Posting it doesn’t make it so.

      Report Post »  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 11:21pm

      I am still waiting for logical reason as to why she would sign the bill to extend the Patriot act !!!
      It continues the Unconstitutional measures to keep you “safe” by frisking 6 year old girls and 90 year old elderly people in wheelchairs with colostomy bags. It continues the Threat of you and I getting our doors knocked down by a team of federal agents coming for us for some contrived “crime”, such as domestic terrorist or enemy of the state, WITHOUT a search warrant or real probable cause, because we exercise our freedom of speech. They are definately monitoring our conversations and some people’s e-mails and cell phone conversations.
      I want my Privacy, Freedom and Liberty back !!!
      An Armed public protects us from terrorists !!!!
      MICHELE BACHMANN is NOT a TEA PARTY, AMERICAN PATRIOT !!!!!

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • skiziks20453
      Posted on August 29, 2011 at 4:04am

      prob is a jackwagon!

      Report Post »  
  • WhoIsTheCoon
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:19pm

    I guarantee you heard one term president at least 20 times. Then you heard the same talking points she thinks will get her elected for the CFR.

    Report Post »  
  • searching for the Truth
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:17pm

    I stand with “ Israel ” – Help us out Glenn on the real position these candidates have on Israel.

    Report Post »  
    • Ookspay
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:24pm

      Israel Smisrael! We’re talking oil and envirowhackos here! Drill now drill here!
      God will take care of his people Israel, although I am not sure he still loves them after what they did to his Son!

      Report Post » Ookspay  
    • searching for the Truth
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:45pm

      Yeah ! The Jews condemned Him , the “ Gentiles ” killed Him , And everyone else stood around and watched.

      Report Post »  
    • searching for the Truth
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 8:51pm

      So. Where does the guilt lay? Poopy drawers.

      Report Post »  
    • Ookspay
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:15pm

      2000 years later and the Jews are still waiting for their Messiah. What exactly does coming soon mean to God’s chosen people, didn’t they read the book they wrote?

      I still stand with the Jewish people even though they have proven to be very wrong many times…. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. I stand!

      Report Post » Ookspay  
    • searching for the Truth
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:49pm

      Good! You better. Another question? The “ Blood ” was on whose hands depicted in the ” Word.” I forgive you. I love You, But go check your drawers.

      Report Post »  
    • searching for the Truth
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:52pm

      God is coming to the Jews. He is on His way.

      Report Post »  
    • searching for the Truth
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:55pm

      And, forgive me as well?

      Report Post »  
    • Ookspay
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 11:15pm

      Nothing to be forgiven for, speak as you wish, as will I.

      I have no problem with the Jews and I do believe that they were God’s chosen people, they may still be. But I do know that The United States of America has been God’s soldier, peace keeper and protector of freedom the world over for hundreds of years. God has blessed America far more than he has blessed Israel. WE are God’s chosen people; we the ones who believed and accepted his Son as our Lord and Saviour. Yes we must stand, Stand for America, God’s best last hope for Mankind.

      Report Post » Ookspay  
  • nptden
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:16pm

    Right on. Time to shut down all these commie agencies that are destroying our economy. Notice how the lefties never insist on the same controls on their commie comrades like Russia, China and SA. Fact is the Marxist are using our system to destroy us. Time we CHANGE it all. CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN..

    Report Post » nptden  
  • MONICNE
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:10pm

    Anything we drill gets placed on the “world market” to benefit China and Europe, so why should we drill.

    After the rest of the world runs out of oil, we will have ultimate power and the last laugh.

    TEA

    Report Post » MONICNE  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:17pm

      By that time America as we know it will wither and blow away. If Michelle is the one to lead America out of the Obama Depression, by squashing these Non- envioronmentalist Nutjobs shes alright by me.Most of my DEMOCRAT friends don’t recycle, drive Large Suvs, and keep their Oil or Gas fed furnaces going strong all winter, They are hypocrites. ONLY JOBS will revive this economy and Barry , has no clue , that Small and Medium business’s create REAL jobs.

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
  • Smokey_Bojangles
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:09pm

    Like everybody that runs on real ideas,they never come to fruition.There is a greater power running Government.It is not God,and it is not us.

    Report Post » Smokey_Bojangles  
  • cookcountypatriot
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:08pm

    now that what im talking about…tell the radicals in all areas to go pound sand…it will be fun to watch thier hissy fits,,,then we can jail them ..i love it

    Report Post » cookcountypatriot  
  • Smokey_Bojangles
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:07pm

    But It may harm the 3 toes sea snot.We must not have that!Besides.Someone will get rich and it won’t be us.

    Report Post » Smokey_Bojangles  
  • shirtsbyeric
    Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:03pm

    Sounds like she wants to “Right a sinking ship”.

    Report Post »  
1 2 3

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love