Bachmann: Liberals Welcome at Legal Summits
- Posted on January 8, 2011 at 12:40am by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann said Friday that liberal commentators and legal experts would be just as welcome as conservatives to participate in a series of constitutional discussions she is organizing for members of Congress.
The Minnesota Republican and founder of the congressional tea party caucus drew criticism after Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, one of the most conservative members of the high court, agreed to appear at the first event Jan. 24. Some legal experts noted that the court could soon find itself wading into contentious political issues, including efforts to strike down President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul, and said justices who appear at events sponsored by a prominent Republican could do damage to their impartiality.
But Bachmann said it’s not uncommon for Supreme Court justices to speak publically about their legal philosophies. In November, Scalia and Justice Stephen Breyer, one of the most liberal members of the court, sparred over various constitutional questions during a rare public debate sponsored by Texas Tech University Law School.
Bachmann said Democrats and Republicans would all be welcome to attend.
“The idea is just to create an opportunity for us to wrap our minds around our magnificent founding documents before we cast votes,” Bachmann said.
Bachmann said guests could include both legal scholars and commentators, and future seminars are likely to include presentations by former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese and lawyer Mark Levin, a conservative commentator and radio host. She said other Supreme Court justices are also considering her invitation.
While so far only conservative speakers are planned, Bachmann said she’d be interested in lining up liberal speakers as well.
“This is bipartisan and we are interested in hearing from voices all the way along the spectrum,” she said.
Bachmann, who has drawn a national following with frequent guest appearances on cable and network news shows, broke fundraising records with a $13 million haul en route to winning her third term in Minnesota’s 6th Congressional District. She hinted earlier this week at a possible presidential run in 2012, and plans a trip later this month to the early caucus state of Iowa.
Bachmann said Friday that she intended to deliver speeches in Iowa and other early-primary states because she wants to help launch a conversation that shapes the agenda of the next Republican candidate for president. She said she wants that candidate to be a “strong, courageous constitutional conservative,” but wouldn’t answer questions about how seriously she is considering a possible bid.
“It’s a mistake to spend a year speculating on who the eventual nominee will be,” Bachmann said. “We need to spend the next year talking about the issues that will define the race.”
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 690 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 659 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 524 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 361 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 327 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 210 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 225 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order Read More
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 210 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (133)
Texas_Tip
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 7:32amThis is well done Rep. Bachmann.
I’ve written and asked my Representative to attend these seminars and will continue to do so. Constantly reminding him of his yea vote on the patently unconstitutional Bill of Attainder (H.R. 1586) and equally intrusive (H.R. 1664). A remedial course on what he’s sworn to support and defend is entirely in order. Perhaps yours could use one as well.
Cheers,
Report Post »Tip
PatriotDaze
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 7:47amTexas_Tip,
Just curious. What’s your beef (that’s a Texas quip) with limiting the executive bonuses at corporate entities that took our TARP money? How are these bills patently unconstitutional? Employers can still pay these bonuses from other funds….but it’s entirely within the purview of the American Taxpayers to stipulate that our money not be used for that purpose.
Obviously you’re familiar with the fine print, and I am not, so I would welcome any additional information to support your contention that we should contact our Legislators.
Report Post »wodiej
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 6:55amI think it’s a great idea and if liberals do decide to show up and derail the process, they will just make themselves look bad. Think of it as a freebie for constitutional conservatives.
People still don’t get the Saul Alinsky strategy. Liberals throw conservatives off message with insults, disagreements, vulgarity and other such nonsense. Then you see people arguing w liberals and they accomplished what they set out to do and how did this help conservatives when no one can hear the message over the arguing?
Report Post »Reasonabiliy
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 6:38amEveryone has a right to their opinion but I for one am tired of hearing people say crap like. “She’s not Presidential Material” or whatever. Who says she isn’t ? Magaret Thatcher is a prime example of what women can do while the cowardly men hide and monitor how something might affect their careers. We have too many tough guys with big mouths who do nothing but blow hot air around. Palin and Bachmann are among the few conservatives that think outside the box and actually work for us. I’m not counting on finding any“ real men” to run for president with the conservative conviction of these fine ladies. The ladies are carrying the water while the boys are playing in the corner with their dingaling and looking at their crystal ball. So much for the peanut gallery. I say we feed those that WORK not just talk. Palin and Bachmann work!!!
Report Post »wodiej
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 6:47amwell said.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 10:52amYes Bachman
Report Post »eddiee
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 5:31amLove that Mike Spence video, makes me cry Glen Beck. Would like to see Mike, on Glen’s program.
Report Post »concerned3
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 5:19am“FoxholeAtheist
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 3:26am
Yeah, like “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”.
If you want a second opinion, you can always ask John Adams, “The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.”
@FOXHOLEATHEIST: The Adams’ quote you listed above was taken out of context, and incomplete. Whether this was done in ignorance or intentionally, is irrelevent. Article XI of the Treaty of Tripoli (1797) which you misquoted reads: “As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion as it has in itself no character of enmity [hatred] against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen [Muslims] and as the said States [America] have never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.”
Article XI attempts to define for Tripoli that the United States did not have a federally enforced religious constitution, like they had, i.e., they were definative Muslim nations as expressed through their written law (theocracy). Additionally, it was important to distinguish that the United States not be compared to European Christian nations, who had previously engaged in Holy Wars with the Muslim nations.
Overwhelmingly, the statements from the Founding Fathers of the United States were that the principles outlined in the Declaration of Independence, The U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, were in fact based on Christianity, a Judeo/Christian ethic, and the fact that there is a Creator God. It is the foundation of the United States.
While you’re (mis) quoting Adams, here’s one for you: “The general Principles, on which the Fathers achieved Independence, were the only Principles in which that beautiful Assembly of young Gentlemen could Unite, …. And what were these general Principles? I answer, the general Principles of Christianity, in which all those Sects (different Christian denominations) were united: And the general Principles of English and American Liberty, in which all those young Men United, and which had United all Parties in America, in Majorities sufficient to assert and maintain her Independence.
Now I will avow, that I then believed, and now believe, that those general Principles of Christianity, are as eternal and immutable, as the Existence and Attributes of God; and that those Principles of Liberty, are as unalterable as human Nature and our terrestrial, mundane System.” (Source: John Adams to Thomas Jefferson, June 28th, 1813, from Quincy. The Adams-Jefferson Letters).
Additionally, in 1806, the Jefferson Administration negotiated and adopted a new Treaty. Article XI was removed during renegotiations. There’s a lot of reasonable speculation as to why the Article was there and then removed. As Glenn says, “educate yourself.”
Report Post »cykonas
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 8:07amVery enlightening. Thank you.
Report Post »ronmorgen
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 8:46amI love it when anti-christ liberals start quoting the founding fathers to prove the supposed secular roots of the nation. Here’s another by John Adams.
Report Post »“The hope of a Christian is inseparable from his faith. Whoever believes in the divine inspiration of the Holy Scriptures must hope that the religion of Jesus shall prevail throughout the earth. Never since the foundation of the world have the prospects of mankind been more encouraging to that hope than they appear to be at the present time. And may the associated distribution of the Bible proceed and prosper till the Lord shall have made ‘bare His holy arm in the eyes of all the nations, and all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of our God’ (Isaiah 52:10).”
John Quincy Adams
dontbotherme
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 9:11pmWell done. Thank you all. I was looking for that quote by Adams & couldn’t find it.
Report Post »New Wine
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 5:13amRepublicans cherish, guard and hold true the Constitution. Democrats look to skirt, marginalize and render it ineffective at every turn.
Report Post »The difference between Republicans and Democrats is kin to that of dogs and cats. A dog devotion and love will stay until the bitter end…. even lay down and die next to your cold body.
A cat feigns love, demands affection and, if left in the room after you died…… would eat you.
PatriotDaze
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 7:28amNew Wine,
Could your comment be any more self serving? Jeesh……..and I suppose you think everyone ELSE is an elitist.
You know, the SCOTUS and 200+ years of Constitutional case law exist for a reason: the Constitution, while providing a singularly brilliant framework is often really insufficient when dealing with specifics. Yet, those agreeing with YOUR ideology know exactly how it should be applied.
Sound pretty totalitarian to me.
Report Post »BoilitDown
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 2:32amBachman may end up regreting her statement, “This is bipartisan and we are interested in hearing from voices all the way along the spectrum,” There are too many liberals who would not come to learn but to voice their disdain for the founding documents before the lessons are even under way. Just look what happened at the reading of the Constitution on the floor of the house. Shout out in protest before listening is the M.O. of many.
Report Post »OneRepublic4us
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 11:14amSounds like a great trap to me. The also liberals swore to uphold the constitution and if they make arguments against it they should be impeached, imprisoned or shot on sight. Since that isn’t going to happen at least the conservatives will know who has the socialist disease. I hope this will be on TV or at least filmed to be replayed during elections. Remember what happens to libs that believe the government “can do anything it wants”?
Report Post »Tore
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 2:31amHappy to see she has invited “The Great One”, he has got to be one of the best Conservative mind we have.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 10:54amAnd an expert
Report Post »stmike
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 2:19amShe’s definitely a better person than me. Because I would never invite any liberal anywhere even for a good cause. The only thing I’d want to do with libs is airdrop them over Cuba. And I’m sick of all this arguing over the constitution. It says what it means and means what it says and that general welfare clause isn’t even a clause. It carries no force of law. Those 18 following enumerated powers do.
Report Post »FoxholeAtheist
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 3:26amYeah, like “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”.
If you want a second opinion, you can always ask John Adams, “The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.”
Report Post »dontbotherme
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 9:05pmfoxhole. You deliberately ignored… “… that all men are entitled to the full and free exercise of religion.” (Madison).
Report Post »ozz
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:53amShe has my vote! M. Bachmann, Ron Paul 2012!!
Report Post »FoxholeAtheist
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 3:28amOh PLEASE do! Then we Progressives are sure to win!
Report Post »ronmorgen
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 9:05amThat’s your problem F*** Atheist, you are more concerned about winning than advancing truth. You liberals stubbernly hold to your failed ideas even after they have failed because you have never experienced repentance (the ability to admit you were wrong).
Report Post »BRAVEHEART
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:49amOne thing I learned from David Barton is that the Constitution is based on Five basic principals that are established in the Declaration of Independence. Anyone not familiar with these five principals usually has difficulty upholding and comprehending the original intent and purpose of critical Articles of the Constitution. I thind Bachmann should invite David Barton up front before this potentially deteriorates into rhetorical or Idealogolical war.
Report Post »ozz
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 2:00am/agree
Report Post »NancyBee
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 9:51amGreat idea!
Report Post »scout n ambush
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:39amIf they are talking constitution or bill of right’s then they should have mr.david barton with all of his original source material old manuscripts, diary’s , letter‘s of the framer’s and first supreme court justices to show irrefutable original intent and also invite jay sekulow.
Report Post »puck30
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:33amAnyway Bachmann could podcast this?
Report Post »Its Gonna Getcha
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:23amBachmann seems to be doing just fine so far.
Report Post »poverty.sucks
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:11amAll the good intentions are too much for the New Democrat Communist Party to comprehend.
Report Post »untameable-kate
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 11:34amIt is called projecting. The are always trying to pull some sleezy stunt and lie and contort everything, so they naturally assume that everyone else is doing the same thing.
Report Post »krenshau
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:00amI would like to see her and Paul Ryan have a ticket together; doesn‘t matter who’s on top.
Report Post »Ironmaan
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:00amDiscussing the constitution with a liberal is like discussing how to prepare the christmas ham with a muslim.
Report Post »http://guerillatics.com
ozz
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:55amLOLZ so true :D
Report Post »FLDeb
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 5:24amOk that made me LOL! Thanks
Report Post »NJartificer
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 12:56amA force for positive change…….we need more of this
Report Post »oldfashionamerican
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 12:56amVery impressive.
Report Post »ds7
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 12:52amminnesota sends us michelle, and stuart smalley, and the moslem ellison…how?
Report Post »exdem
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:24amOnly 1/3 of the population is brain dead?
Report Post »TRUTHSEEKINGAL
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 4:45amDon’t forget Jesse Ventura WWF/Gov/Truther !!!
Report Post »StMichelob
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 12:49amAnd besides, my personal congressman Mike Pence has my vote anyway. Check out this vid of him in a speach at hillsdale college about the Constitution and the Presidency.
NancyBee
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 9:49amI did check it out awhile back…He’s always been on my radar…the media doesn’t say much about him…but I’m looking at him.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 10:49amCongressman Pence is at the very top of my list. No nonsense, stupid silly side shows. Just a genuine honest, intelligent great American – we could proudly claim he is a President.
Report Post »Kilkee
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:42pmMike Pence is going to run for Indiana Governor….
I think he will run for President in 8 years.. he is a young man. (51)
He is loved here in Indiana.. he will win the Governorship in a landslide.
Report Post »pamela kay
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 12:47amI respect this lady. She knows what she stands for and will not back down. When you have truth on your side there is no reason to hide anything.
Report Post »Independent Tess
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 7:56amShe came onto my radar when I heard that insulting clip of Arlen Specter scolding her like a 12 year old and telling her to “act like a lady”. I was impressed at how calmly and respectfully she answered.
Report Post »I was so angry at his demeaning attitude that I wrote him to say he would never again get a vote from ME.
So glad he’s history!
NancyBee
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 9:43amI agree……I really like Bachmann, she knows how to stand up for what she believes in….and always makes the lib look like a babbling nut….for instance …Weiner…..C. Matthews. She gets it and it is written all over her face….Go Bachmann
Report Post »agapemusic
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 12:47amAbout time American politicians took a course in basic American politics. You go girl!
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:03amMost of those “journalists” could certainly use some education also!
Report Post »Quad-rip-legic
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:04amsomebody needs to introduce a bill that will make it mandatory for all the politicians and they should also take courses in the subject matter for which committees they are in.
Report Post »dawgPound
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:13amprolly should know all that “constitution stuff: prior to being elected, dontcha think?
Report Post »exdem
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:22amObama is a constitutional law professor. Joke of the day – but true.
Report Post »mcfinch
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 4:41amAgreed.
http://politicalbowl.com – Political Video Website
Report Post »StMichelob
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 12:47amI think she is great, but I don’t want her to run. I think she does a LOT more good in the House, speaking and convincing middle of the road members…Just saying.
Report Post »StMichelob
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 12:56amMichelle Bachman is not presidential, but is a great firecracker and leader in the House. My personal vote goes to Mike Pence, my Indiana congressional rep, and I believe a true Conservative American. Look at this video of his speech at Hillsdale College and decide.
Report Post »http://www.thehotjoints.com/2010/09/27/video-mike-pence-speaks-at-hillsdale-college/
exdem
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:19amLove Love Love Mike Pence!
Report Post »StMichelob
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:24amEXDEM did you watch the vid?
Report Post »exdem
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:43amI have followed him for a while and he seems to be a man that sticks with his convictions. I called his office in DC a few months ago urging him to run and asked where I could send my donation. I did not go to the video yet- I might have already seen it.
Report Post »StMichelob
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:54amBetter than japanese lesbian porn, BELIEVE me!!
FLDeb
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 5:21amSTMICHELOB, I watched the entire speech, I loved it. Please I am not meaning to sound snide or unbelieving, but have become very jaded toward politicians…… What is his voting record? I know I could eventually find it, but thought if you follow him, you could save me a little time.
The first time I heard BHO speak, I was sooooo impressed I wanted to vote for him. Went and attempted to find ANY information on him and all I could find was a (first and only?) bill he was sponsoring for a world tax on the U.S. taxpayers to be given to a world organization ( U.N. maybe?) to fight WORLD poverty. So that was my 2 second love affair with the present self appointed king. Never could figure out why more people had not bothered to check the man out……
Report Post »cykonas
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 8:01amThank you for the link St. Mich. However it’s voting records, not speeches, that we need to pay attention to. Our current President convinced 53% of voting Americans to vote for him based on media presence and speeches. I’m not saying that is true of Pence. I am saying that it’s too easy to say anything in a speech aimed to that particular audience. And in speeches, most of what they say is very, very generalized. It’s much more difficult to wiggle on your actual record.
Report Post »ronmorgen
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 8:30am@ StMichelob Listened to every word. He’s a patriot and constitutionalist. We need more leaders like this.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 8:46amAnyone known best for vitriolic speech, running from questioning about what she has said, and outright lying (remember the “$2billion” Obama trip? the census debacle that she had to walk back on? sooooooooooo many other examples…) is just not electable. So I say, let her run ;)
Report Post »Rob
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 9:04amThat Mike Pence speech is right on!
Report Post »StMichelob
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 11:11amNot real sure how to describe his “voting record”, but i do know he is a conservative…can’t really compare him to another, like “Reagan’, But I’ve been following politics for a looong time and I have not been this enamoured with another republican like this since …well, Reagan. lol. His voting record is sound, not to sure about earmarks, but since I live in his district, and this place is the ass end of nowhere, I‘d imagine he don’t ever get any. Best thing would be to youtube him and see some of his interviews. He is a super-smart guy, quick witted and doesn’t really talk like a politician. More like he‘s talkin’ to some bubbas at the feed store about serious, hard times.
Report Post »At any rate, We’ll get to know him next year during the mega-primaries filled with superstars.
Unlike last year…Huckabee was my choice…how the HELL did McCain win there at the end? I smelled conspiracy, but meh. Obama hasn’t been TOO bad
*cough cough…ehem. Sorry. Swallowed a bug.
http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=34024
JQCitizen
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 6:36pmI, too saw that video; and it was stellar!! I you want to have your Patriot Heart warmed, watch it and marvel!
Report Post »StMichelob
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 11:41pm@FLDEB maybe it’s because he is the antichrist? lol….seriously, and to those wanting his record and are skeptical of speaches, his is sound and his speaches come from his heart. I believe (and I am VERY skeptical of politicians) that he truely believes what he is saying and LOVES his country and constitution, and would make a VERY good, integrity styled President. I am a former Marine (as if any of you didn’t know) and Integrity is formost on my list of qualifications. Like I stated above, this isn’t a big-city district he presides over, and for a man of his stature to come from this nothing hell-hole and be a superstar in the House, well, it says something for me. Doesn’t matter what you did for your own people if what you have done reflects positively on the people of the whole country, including your own.
Report Post »bbquizzle
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 12:45amDebate and discourse are good, I suppose. Just don’t let them push a pile of crap and call it fact, Michele.
Report Post »click4cheapandeasyweb
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:10amYou go girl! This is a great thing she is doing.
And who knows, some of the liberals might even learn something.
Report Post »cheezwhiz
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:12amliberal commentators and legal experts would be just as welcome as conservatives to participate in a series of constitutional discussions she is organizing for members of Congress.
—————————–
This tete-a-tete will be about the US Constitution, right ?
Report Post »Since when did liberals start believing in the
US CONSTITUTION ?
drattastic
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:38amCLICK please let “you go girl” go the way of “groovy”,“right on”and the the grand daddy of all dorky sayings “get r done”.
Report Post »ozz
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 1:51am******** by definition either do not understand the constitution or have twist it’s meaning (lie) for it not to decimate their belief system.
Report Post »Liberal ideals and constitutional ideals are mutually exclusive.
Why provide them another platform to try to muddy the waters on issues that are clearly defined?
Is not that counter productive of the goal?
NeoFan
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 2:56amit amazes me that Michele and other conservatives still waste their time giving interviews and talking to the Libs. Nothing good will ever come of it.
Report Post »Dustyluv
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 6:01amWell Foxhole…I think you are gonna knock hell dry…You may not believe in God now, you will when you meet him and he allows you to wander off to Satan’s house. Have your family throw a flame retardant suit in your casket, you are gonna need it…
mtnclimberjim
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 8:21amFOXHOLE (the one under the tail)
You are the reason trying to have a conversation with libs is such a waste of time. You freaks can’t see your mental disorder and it frustrates you to the point of self destruction. It is truly fun to watch the libs make such asses of themselves. The debates the FOX news with the split screens are so funny to watch and are a perfect example of your mental disorder. I really can’t believe some of the crap you dorks claim as fact, delusional.
Report Post »Marcobob69
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 8:38amMaybe VP if she’s not interested in the top spot. She has definitely got her finger on the pulse of the TEA party, so a run for the top is a possibility. Go get ‘em, Michele!!!
Report Post »Moocephus
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 8:41amI’ve seen what happens when a conservative speaks to a lib audience. Interested to see what happens here.
Report Post »Rickfromillinois
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 8:46amThanks for sharing those deep thoughts Foxhole. Usually you only see such pearls of wisdom like yours are on the walls of men’s rooms in cheap bars. I always wondered what kind of morons wrote those, now I have a good idea of what kind of moron does.
Report Post »poverty.sucks
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 9:28amJustices who appear at events sponsored by a prominent Republican could do damage to their impartiality, yet one can lecture at University of California-Berkeley that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”
Report Post »vidyohs
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 10:46amThe constitution is an excellent standard to run a corporation, and it is as plain as day to intelligent people that those who seek to have the word “promote” interpreted as “guarantee”, and the word “among” be interpreted as the word “within”, are doing so because they want to slip beyond the standards and make the government theirs to sell at will.
It is equally obvious that Scalia debating Breyer about the intent of the constitution is like having an experienced farmer debating a city boy about the role of weeds in the garden. Scalia will pull them where Breyer is content to nurture them because to do anything is else is being judgmental.
Report Post »shorthanded12
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 11:41amBachman has more “BALLS” than most of the male gender in congress. She along with Palin has more backbone than the rest of them.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 12:33pmExcellent idea, and I do hope you all will be watching on CSPAN. Frankly, it’s a little tiring reading how the Democrats are “violating the Constitution” without ever reading a single reference to exactly when or how the Constitution is being violated.
Report Post »mcfinch
Posted on January 8, 2011 at 2:23pmI am looking forward to the debates.
http://politicalbowl.com – Political Video Website
Report Post »