Bachmann Super PAC Launches New Attack Ad on Perry, Perry Blasts Back
- Posted on September 2, 2011 at 1:38am by
Jessie Abrams
- Print »
- Email »
One of Michele Bachmann’s support groups launched an attack ad on Thursday, targeting Rick Perry’s claims at fiscal conservatism.
Courtesy of Keep Conservatives United
The Super PAC, Keep Conservatives United, set an ad to hokey music playing up the perception of the Texas governor as a hillbilly who isn’t what he says he is when it comes to money management. The ad slams him as a faux fiscal conservative who increased state spending and borrowing during his 11 years of service as governor.
Take a look at the spot below:
The Perry campaign responded to the ad Thursday afternoon according to Business Insider, saying its claims were “patently and provably false” and attacking the Super PAC by calling it Bachmann’s “front-group.”
“Gov. Perry is a proven fiscal conservative, having cut taxes, signed six balanced budgets, and led Texas to become America’s top job-creating state,” Perry’s communications director Ray Sullivan said in a statement. “Unlike Washington, the Texas budget is balanced, does not run deficits and limits spending, even as Texas added jobs and population in big numbers.”
BI says the ad has already run on CNN, CNBC and Fox News in South Carolina, a very important state who’s support both Perry and Bachmann will be gunning to win.
This is the first public attack on Perry since he joined the race a few weeks ago and also the first one from the Bachmann team. Bachmann now trails both Perry and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney in national polls.
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 690 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 659 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 524 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 362 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 327 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 211 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 227 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order Read More
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 211 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (75)
Sunnyr
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 5:36amMichele Bachmann is a FLAKE and a dishonest one at that. FactCheck.Org states the following:
A pro-Bachmann PAC misleads viewers when it says Rick Perry
doubled the size of Texas’ budget from 2000 to 2010. When adjusted for
inflation and population, the total Texas budget increased by 21 percent
during that time. Excluding federal funds, however, state spending
actually went down by 6 percent.
The ad also says the Texas governor this year is “spending more money
than the state takes in.” That’s true, but the state is required to
balance the budget. This year, the Legislature dipped into a rainy day
fund and made budget cuts to balance the books.
Jackers
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 9:02amIsn’t it amazing how so many of the pundits on FOX News try to label Rick Perry as a Tea Party candidate? This couldn’t be further from the truth!
Rick Perry is an open-border globalist and not to be trusted.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 9:26amLots of manipulation, from BOTH!
Doubled spending over the decade
-True when not adjusted for inflation or population growth
-If adjusted for inflation and population growth spending still increased but at 21% over a decade or 4.2% every two years.
-Either scenario Texas Government spending grew
Spent more then taking in- True
-2010 used Federal stimulus to balance it’s budget
-2011 Texas had to tap into oil rainy day fund
Covers deficit with record borrowing-True
-Record sale of one year notes
-The borrowed money must be paid in one year
-If it had no deficit, it would not be taking from rainy day fund or selling these non-interest notes (a loan)
While Bachmann‘s SuperPAC uses figures for their advantages so does Perry by saying he doesn’t grow government and spending.
Truth-Texas spent more then it has made, deficit, and spending has increased.
What is the difference in either‘s behavior and Washington’s? Nothing…
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 11:16am@okie – Perry tried to make cuts permanent, but, the state‘s senate wouldn’t allow it. Now, they have gone back and done so after all.
I’m not saying he is perfect. Who is?
But, you are all listening to mainstream media spin, and you are getting a BIASED view.
Either that, or, you are actually shills and trolls pretending to be displeased TeaPartiers.
I’m not endorsing Perry, but, I AM going to stand up for ANYONE when I hear mistruths and misinformation being spread.
Currently, I have not endorsed anyone.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 12:27pm@Tom
Please show me where I spoke of Perry trying to keep cuts permeant or not. I did not.
Listening to the ad and checking it against the state comptroller‘s annual financial reports isn’t mainstream media. Its FACT and doing my own research……
I do not appreciate being called a shill or a troll, that is very disrespectful and non productive. I see it the same as violence. It isn’t very nice to throw insults, especially when unwarranted. Those with TRUTH need no insults just as they need no violence.
So respectfully, what exactly is the “mistruths” you speak of from my post? Back your mouth up with facts please. Thank you and look forward to your reply.
Report Post »laney
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 3:03amGlen Beck cares about having control over his own body. SO please please ask Perry WHY HE SUPPORTED MANDATED VACINNATIONS of GUARDASIL with NO…got that, for ANY reason WAIVERS.
Report Post »You simply cannot be a Conservative and take such a position of power over the bodies of the masses. NOPE…I’m warry of Perry and if he becomes the GOP candidate I bow out. No more activism. Because in my view after all the research he is a wolf in sheeps clothing and I won’t fall for that. I want someone who doesn’t get in bed with BIG PHARMA to be my candidate. And don’t forget about his working for Al Gore and supporting Hilary Care. I mean give me a break!! He’s being sold to us like that a bad insurance package. I’m NOT buying!!!
TomFerrari
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 11:13amYou’d rather have 4 more years of this mess than vote for Perry?
REALLY?
Report Post ».
.
.
laney
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 2:55amI’d like to know why no one, not even GBeck has discussed Perry’s support for FORCE VACCINATIONS of Guardasil. When you research, as GB always suggests, you learn about the heinous side effects. And Perry said NO WAIVERS until the death toll really mounted. WHY is no one discussing this. IT is a huge issue because it concerns THE CONTROL OVER ONE’S OWN BODY. Please tell me how a conservative could support force vaccinations. There is no way to justify this. And it makes me HUGELY wary of Perry. Hey that’s a good slogan. WARY OF PERRY!!!
Report Post »He look asd sounds good…BUT HIS ACTIONS NOW…THOSE SAY SOMETHING QUITE DIFFERENT. I small a rat and I was fooled into supporting McCain when I KNEW BETTER…not going down that road again… G BECK PLEASE DISCUSS THIS ISSUE. You of all people want the right to govern your OWN BODY!!!
TomFerrari
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 11:19amI understand parents DID have the ability to opt out.
So, before you make accusations, please do real research, and not just SAY you have.
Standing for the TRUTH, always!!!
(and I have been wrong myself, too!)
Report Post »merzfan
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 11:30amAnd why won‘t BECK discuss Perry’s financial and political ties to ISLAMIC activists?
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 12:50pm@Tom
The vaccination was mandatory and there is a provision for parents to file an affidavit to prevent the mandate on religious or philosophical grounds.
The issue is this:
Executive ordered
MANDATED, forced unless you formally (file paperwork) object at YOUR expense
Perry’s financial ties to Merck, the maker of the only approved vaccination
The State offering it FREE to those without insurance
This is very similar to how Obama illegally passed mandated health insurance except to those who object at their expense to be issued a waiver. What is the difference?
Report Post »laney
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 2:48amAfter researching I am shocked to learn that Perry mandated VACCINATIONS for ALL young women in
Report Post »Texas with the Guardasil vaccination. Now pushing asside your feelings about VACCINATIONS, the bottom line is YOU CANNOT BE A CONSERVATIVE and support force vaccinations. He said NO WAIVERS. That alone is the reason I can’t support him. But friends have added in that he worked for Al Gore’s Campaign and supported Hillary Care. Add in that many say he is the Bilderberger pick and I say…he becomes the GOP candidate and I bow out of even voting!!!
Sunnyr
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 5:39amIt is FALSE that Perry did not allow parents to opt out of the Guardisil Vaccinations. They had that option all along.
Report Post »oil and gas man
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 2:46amRegardless of who is president next, we on the Southwest Texas border ranches are doing all and everything we can. We have our own form of justice….Shoot, Shovel, and Shut-up. This is a notice to all you illegals who might be reading this…..If you cut our fences and we catch you with you black back-packs full of drugs or your trunks full of drugs…YOU WILL DIE !!! The law enforcement in our area isn’t investigating buzzards anymore. No sensationalizing the situation like Arizona. Our ranch and everyone near us is tied up in lawsuits from Mexico, when its citizens illegally cross the border and attempt to cross our ranches and die from exposure or dehydration. They have not even once been successful with their lawsuits, but it ties up our money on attorneys.We are sick and tired of it and will not stand for it anymore !!!!!!!!
Report Post »HellAndBack
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 4:32amI got some rounds I could send you… And if you grind them in a meat grinder first they are easier to bury and harder to find. j/k… maybe.
Report Post »Gorp
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 9:14amThat’s not a bad idea. Start an ammo fund for border citizens.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 9:50amOil and Gas
Feel like you are being invaded? Too bad the Governors of the border states do not feel the same or know their Constitution for if they did they would send troops to the border immediately as granted by the Constitution to stop such an invasion.
Article I Section 10.3
“No state shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty of tonnage, keep troops, or ships of war in time of peace, enter into any agreement or compact with another state, or with a foreign power, or engage in war, unless actually INVADED, OR in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay.”
I believe the argument of invasion and delay of the Federal Government to act is suffice for Border Governors to send troops to stop such invasion until the Federal Government acts.
I know your frustrated and you should be but don’t let that frustration destroy your soul by murder. Murder is not a justified punishment for illegal entry, property damage, or even drug smuggling. Something to ponder……
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 11:29am@okie – I hate to say it, but, I agree – I believe governors, DO, in fact, have the Constitutional right to send troops to the border.
Before anyone screams it is not an invasion – let me point out the high powered weapons they are USING on Border Patrol Agents and that they are bringing to and for across the border. They are ARMED and DANGEROUS, and, if nothing else, are a waging a FINANCIAL war against American JOBS and American TAXPAYERS – taking money out of tax coffers, and taking jobs Americans WOULD DO. They are NOT just picking fruit and veggies as many claim. They have GOOD construction jobs, food-service jobs, housekeeping jobs, landscaping jobs, etc. Claim Americans won’t do those jobs? Just watch HGTV or Food Network for an hour. Americans would START THEIR OWN COMPANIES and provide housekeeping services, etc. Many restaurants WILL NOT HIRE YOU if you do not speak Spanish now, because so many of their employees ONLY speak Spanish!!
Report Post »Now, the Secretary of Labor (an appointed position-not an elected one) is SIGNING INTERNATIONAL TREATIES (calling them “agreements”) that commit us to paying ILLEGAL ALIENS minimum wage. They are not even allowed to work in this country… by law! And she thinks she has the authority to LEGISLATE ??? What the HELL?? I guess it is to protect the seven Americans living illegally in South America.
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 1:03pm@Tom
Why do you hate to agree with me?
It just shows how ignorant and fake our border Governors are. The definition of “Invade” clearly fits what is occurring on our border and social programs.
Instead of sending troops to the border, Rick Perry passes the Texas DREAM act to help the invaders! Again similar to Obama and his DREAM act. Just another FACT for ya…..
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 8:42amPerry wants amnesty for illegals.
Report Post »Ron Paul is the only candidate who will close the border and find solutions other than blanket amnesty.
Bush II didn’t close the borders, even after 9/11. No GOP candidate (unless we FORCE one in, like Ron Paul) will close the border.
LibertariansUnite
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 2:35amRon Paul 2012
Report Post »HellAndBack
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 4:34amSorry… hes too much an Isolationist. We need to make sure we protect our Allies and Interest. Just a cold hard fact.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 8:11am@Hell and Back
Please quit lying or educate yourself. Ron Paul is not an isolationist. Ron Paul may be too much a Non-Interventionist for YOU is the correct way of stating the truth. Who is more in line with the Constitution, you or Ron Paul? Ron Paul…
Please show me from the Constitution were our Federal Government has the power to protect “interests” or “allies”.
What is odd is so many fear a world Government and proclaim to want freedom yet out the other side of their mouth proclaim we must protect our “allies” and “interests” therefore wanting a bigger Federal Government and World Government. You can’t have it both ways….
Why have an “ally” if it can not protect itself? An ally that needs protection is a dependent and should simply become US territory.
The interests the federal Government is required to protect is the American people and territory (States).
Just some cold hard facts…..
Report Post »KrishnaDas
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 8:21amIt is the neocons who are isolationists, using the muzzle of a gun of the US Federal government to spread “democracy”, alienating, hence isolating us from the rest of the world. Please refrain from newspeak and try to understand the different between isolationism and non-interventionism.
Report Post »KrishnaDas
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 8:23am@HELLANDBACK
When I raised my right hand to defend the Constitution, I don’t recall anything about “protect our allies and interests” nor have I ever seen any reference to that in the Constitution nor in any of the writings of the authors of the Constitution.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 7:23amRead “Blowback”
Report Post »also…..
“If you hit someone and kill their family, they will hate you and probably hit you back in the future.”
GadsdenGurl
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 1:38am“Legislation authored by border legislators Pat Haggerty and Eddie Lucio establishes an important study that will look at the feasibility of bi-national health insurance. This study recognizes that the Mexican and U.S. sides of the border compose one region, and we must address health care problems throughout that region. That’s why I am also excited that Texas Secretary of State Henry Cuellar is working on an initiative that could extend the benefits of telemedicine to individuals living on the Mexican side of the border.” – Governor Rick Perry
http://governor.state.tx.us/news/speech/10688/
Report Post »Speakin'mymind
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 1:34amTexas doesn’t run on deficits; it runs on gas.
Report Post »Daddymac10
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 1:20amIf the Tea Party was serious about enforcing its policies, they would support Michele Bachmann 100%. Other than Palin, she is a major face of the Tea Party, she’s on the Tea Party caucus for God sake, Rick Perry?? who is he?? Many conservative Texans say he is worst than George Bush on immigration. We can trust Bachmann on immigration, Perry may be a liberal on the issue. Perry was once a liberal Democrat, like Bush he talks tough but can we really trust him on all the Tea Party issues?? Or is he another fake liberal conservative like George Bush?? We all know there are no questions about Bachmann’s allegiance. Many may not wanna vote for a woman but she is the real deal. Last thing we need is another fake conservative in office…
Report Post »KrishnaDas
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 8:18amThe tea party supporting a former IRS prosecutor who doesn’t even know that the revolutionary war started in Concord, MA and not Concord, NH. It doesn’t get better than that.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 7:25amDo you even know what the Tea Party stands for?
Report Post »I thought I did at one time, but after hanging here a few months, I see it has changed drastically.
Where are the real Tea Party Patriots?
Do you know their history?
Video: Birth of the Tea Party http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GR4WYqabTxU
Hisnameishussein
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 4:49pmThat’s pretty stupid to use a gaffe to not support her. I don‘t know how long you’ve been following politics but they all make those mistakes here and there. Get real and see if you can find a serious reason Bachmann isn’t the best choice.
Report Post »goobert
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 12:44amRon Paul 2012!
Report Post »jzs
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 1:24amPerry has had balanced budgets alright, with the help of stimulus money from the federal government.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 2:44amGee JZS, your post does not seem to have anything to do with GOOBERTS statement.
Oh well, yes I see in my searching that there are many left wing hits from the usual sources about which you speak.
But when one weeds through all the leftist crap, one finds the real story with many facts that lefty fails to mention.
On another note, have you noticed all the advertisements on this site?
Have you ever thought about all the traffic and web hits you and your cohorts help provide here?
Capitalism and Irony. These are but two, of a few of my favorite things.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 1:51pmGood, I will assume that your lack of a reply, indicates that you did indeed read my post.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 8:33amWe need a CHAMPION OF THE CONSTITUTION, not a champion of news media! RON PAUL 2012!
Report Post »zoro51
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 12:07amfirst off BACHMANS A STUPID next president perry was. PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE DAFT WANNA BEA LEADER running for office.. BESt she be a checker at walmart instead. dont WASTE the vote on BACHMAN …. NEXT let her make ads that will make her look like a stupid bitch.. SEE perry BE ELECTED in 2012. then LAUGH at bachmans exploiuts on AFV tv show… NEXT!
Report Post »FaithfulFriend
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 11:35pmRon Paul is not a Constitutionalists, he’s a pre-Constitutionalists. Ron Paul will never be President. Period. Even George Washington went after the whiskey rebellion, while I‘m certain ole’ Ron never would have.
Report Post »Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 12:12amTalk about a ludicrous non-sequitur!
Report Post »stopspendingourmoney
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 12:29amFor the people that think Ron Paul can not beat obama are morons, they did a few polls and already showed that he could beat him, not only would he get the conservative vote he would get the independent vote also, I have even talked to democrats that voted for obama that like him and would vote for him, so to say he can not win is foolish and you are a victim of the main stream media, We must stop listening to the drivel coming from the Left and the Right “lame-stream” media pushing their own agendas and start thinking outside the box for our agenda… What’s best for America!
Report Post »Shotgun167
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 1:40amYou can invite Uncle Ron into your living room, or have Uncle Sam taking over the whole house.
Report Post »stopspendingourmoney
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 11:30pmHe is a “former democrat.” Research this fraud. Don’t fall for the idea of his celebrity, that’s how we got Obama.
Report Post »stopspendingourmoney
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 10:56pmGoogle: 14 Reasons Why Rick Perry Would Be A Really, Really Bad President…. do you really want another bush or obama?? Vote Ron Paul..
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 8:37amRick Perry = George Bush and McCain chosen by GOP money
Report Post »How did that go for America?
CLOSE THE BORDERS — NO AMNESTY – Vote Ron Paul
stopspendingourmoney
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 10:54pmIf there is truth to this… Google: 14 Reasons Why Rick Perry Would Be A Really, Really Bad President…. do you really want another bush or obama?? Vote Ron Paul..
Report Post »stopspendingourmoney
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 10:41pmGo to youtube and search Rick Perry’s stance on immigration.
Report Post »mikenleeds
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 10:28pmrick Perry is not the tea party guy , he s just another rhino trying to make us think he s a real Conservative
Report Post »KrishnaDas
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 10:20pmThey’re all status quo. Nothing will change, the same direction to insolvency and loss of liberty and general abandonment of the Constitutional republic we were meant to be that the democrats propel us toward though at a slower pace. Actions speak louder than words: http://www.ronpaulwasright.net/Liberal-Rick-Perry.html
Report Post »Shotgun167
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 1:41amIt’s either Uncle Ron or Uncle Sam. You decide.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 8:39amPerry and ACORN? Great link, KrishnaDas. Thanks
Report Post »omni
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 9:45pmOf the Republican contenders, Rick Perry stands out as the front runner. He is business friendly, doesn’t speak in PC parables and is a proven manager. Mr. Goodbar may be out there somewhere but for now its Rick by a landslide.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 8:46amYou obviously didn’t check out the link above http://www.ronpaulwasright.net/Liberal-Rick-Perry.html
I look at the GOOD and BAD of EVERY candidate. I don’t just close my eyes to the bad.
Report Post »merzfan
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 9:38pmPerry is a MOLE! Read Robert Spencer’s well-researched reports (links below) on Perry’s long-time close cooperation with Grover Norquist (an Islamic apologist) and Aga Khan (with ties to CAIR). The latest shenanigans involve subverting the Texas school curriculum, inserting a whitewash of Islamic atrocities throughout history. Now he’s trying to hide it!! Bad guy! Saudi MONEY flows thick and fast around old Rick, and he loves the smell of it!
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/08/here-is-the-aga-khanrick-perry-curriculum-scrubbed-from-the-web-cache-scrubbed-from-google-search.html
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/08/all-traces-of-perryaga-khan-curriculum-removed-from-web.html
Report Post »Joe1123
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 10:03pmYeah, I’ll read that … tomorrow LOL.
Report Post »ronpierce1
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 8:19pmdo not be foolish Perry and obama are the same darn animal, wake up folks
Report Post »db321
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 8:35pmThanks Ron for pointing it out that Perry and Obama are the same – then let’s not have an election – let’s just have another 4 years of Obama.
I don’t see it – can I borrow your glasses.
Report Post »ccr
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 9:22pmThere are some obvious differences between Perry and Obama. But…….there are some similarities.
One of the biggest is the crony, “I’ll take care of ya” relationship between donors and the candidate. We’ve seen plenty of that with Obama. And…….if places like Fox and the Blaze would actually report some NEEDED TRUTH on Perry, others would know about it.
Shame on Beck’s support of Perry after slamming Obama so much.
Report Post »KrishnaDas
Posted on September 3, 2011 at 8:16amAnd if we get the status quo, nothing will change, the problems get worse, perhaps a bit slower than they would if Obama had won, but still worse. And in yet another four years, the so-called “conservative” who spent money like a drunken progressive will be blamed and the voters will mistakingly blame “conservative” policies and then we’ll get someone who will probably be even worse than Obama.
Report Post »ronpierce1
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 8:17pmyea but Glen said he had a come to jesus moment..and sarah says he’s a darn good fella you rascal, plus we seen him pray and hold a gun, so he must be the real deal…you forget he was a democrat and forced children to get shots that killed some of them, and walked away with money for the handy deed, and forget he backed climate change and health care and the nafta highway and, and , and ,a nd
Report Post »dontbotherme
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 8:10pmWe must not have a 3rd party candidate if we wish to win & get Obama out of office. We must back the candidate the majority choose. I think that will be Perry.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 9:01amWhat 3rd party candidate? Ron Paul is running as a Republican!
Report Post »The ONLY Republican that’s a true Constitutionalist with 30 years of voting record to prove it.
spadikam12
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 7:45pmWe are one have only one enemy Barak Husain Obama.
Report Post »Omnivore
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 8:18pmActually, Obama is just the current head of the beast, called statism. Cut off that head and two more grow in its place. I say you have to cut the floor out from under the beast by going after the premises, on principle.
Report Post »Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
Posted on September 2, 2011 at 7:40pmPerry is the ultimate RINO…
His record, not his rhetoric, is atrocious. Now that he‘s running for office he’s saying what he knows the right wants him to say. The fact is this guy is a NWO, Statist, pure and simple. Do your homework! He is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
We have a historic opportunity to get a real Constitutionalist in place… This is not the guy!
Report Post »