Baltimore Police Detain Hearing Impaired Man for Taking Photos at Rail Station
- Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:25am by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
When Christopher Fussell traveled from Oregon to the Northeast recently, he decided to document the trip via photos and video. He’s somewhat of a photography enthusiast, so it’s not surprising. Innocent enough, it would seem.
But while at a train station in Baltimore, transit police detained him for nearly an hour and told him it was illegal for him to take pictures of the transit system without prior authorization, even citing the Patriot Acts as justification for their position. And Fussel captured it all on video.
In the lengthy exchange, the officers can be heard stumbling through legal reasoning while trying to tell Fussell he can‘t photograph and he can’t record them without their permission. Fussell, however, stands his ground:
“It is my understanding that I am free to take pictures as long as it’s not for commercial purposes but for personal use,” Fussell said in the video.
“Not on state property, not without proper authorization,” an officer said.
Fussell: “From who?”
Officer: “Nobody’s allowed to take pictures.”
The exchange, which was made more difficult because Fussell is hearing impaired, is posted in two parts on YouTube:
According to Fussell’s video description:
MTA Police finally gave back my farecard and ordered me to “cease and desist,” but continued to surround and bother me until I boarded the next Penn Station train. They followed me to Penn Station and got Amtrak Police involved. I felt at that point I had no choice but to give Amtrak Police my ID so they could conduct a warrant check. If the MTA Police hadn’t followed me, Amtrak Police most likely would have not conducted this security check based on my experiences at various Amtrak stations between Washington DC and Boston. The Amtrak Police Officer was truthful about the fact that there was no prohibition against taking pictures of trains or train stations, so his honesty is what also compelled me to give my ID. He was, in my opinion, dragged into this fiasco because of MTA Police.
Fussell’s videos were posted to YouTube on May 11. Since then, the Baltimore MTA has admitted the the officers were in error. WJZ reports:
The MTA admits the officers were in error.
“They can most certainly take photos of our system,” Ralign Wells, the MTA Administrator, said.
In addition to being wrong about MTA and state policy, the officer incorrectly cites the Patriot Act.
[...]
The MTA acknowledges that additional training is in order.
“We’ll look at our training processes, we’ll look at whether any administrative situations need to occur with those officers,” Wells said
“This is not South Africa under apartheid and in this country, police do not have the right to walk up to you and demand you produce identification to them,” David Rocah of the ACLU told the station.




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (170)
NOBALONEY
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:38amThe officers acted properly.
Report Post »wither
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:48amThese officers, and those like them, don’t belong anywhere near a uniform.
Report Post »proliance
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 12:10pmThe officers don’t know the law.
1. Cop said photographer could not shoot his pictures without prior permission. Here’s the MTA policy: “A permit is not required for noncommercial, personal-use filming or photography by the general public that does not interfere with transit operations or safety.”
2. Cop said it was illegal to record them, claiming it was the same as wiretapping. Here’s what a Maryland judge had to say about it: “Those of us who are public officials and are entrusted with the power of the state are ultimately accountable to the public,” the judge wrote. “When we exercise that power in public fora, we should not expect our actions to be shielded from public observation.”
3. The officers unlawfully detained a person because of their own ignorance, and threatened to arrest him for not providing a physical ID. There is no law requiring anybody to carry identification.
Report Post »Texas Grasshopper
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 12:18pm@ baloney …read my first post please
Report Post »AwwwYeah
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 2:20pmFulla-Boloney,
Report Post »What part of “the MTA admits the officers were in error” don’t you understand?
proliance
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:16amPhotography is not a crime.
http://www.pixiq.com/contributors/248
This is a website I frequent that highlights the abuses by police against people who are legally taking pictures or shooting video. Cops are universally clueless despite their training.
Report Post »BetterDays
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:15amObviously it’s the trains fault! If we didn’t have trains, planes, boats, cars, buses, motorcycles, hot airballons, all manners of transport then we wouldn’t have this picture taking problem!
Report Post »And then there’s the cities, towns, Bergson, burgs, burgh, villes, issue as well!
Oh, forget about it just let the Goverment put TSA everywhere, NOT
publicuss
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:14am*This is not legal advice*
Remain calm, ask the officer, “Officer are you detaining me or am I free to go” If he wants to search or asks you to give him your cell phone, state “I do not consent to searches” then ask, “Officer are you detaining me or am I free to go?” Stay calm. Do not answer questions unless your lawyer is there to assist you and he won’t be. Do not consent. If the officers block your way, ask again in a louder voice-to draw attention to yourself and the situation, “OFFICER ARE YOU DETAINING ME OR AM I FREE TO GO”.
We do not have to produce ID, unless operating a motor vehicle and you do not have to give police your name in most states, unless they DETAIN you. If they detain you, pat you down looking for possible weapons and refuse to let you leave, state “I have nothing to volunteer to you officer, I want to speak to a lawyer”.
The fact that you are asking about being ‘detained’, refusing a ‘search’ and asking to speak to a ‘lawyer’, all trigger certain protections under the ‘law’.
Want to know more?
http://www.flexyourrights.org
Report Post »*This is not legal advice.
Nervous Investor
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:12amCould they have confused photography for pornography ?
Report Post »Mateytwo Barreett
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 12:58pmWhy, was his name , or did he resemble a weiner?
Report Post »TXBORN
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:11amI agree with TXGrasshopper. I think the cops were right in questioning him. The only thing this guy did wrong was not provide his ID when asked. The police would’ve probably ran his information, just in case something would’ve happened to the rail in the future, and let him go.
Report Post »proliance
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:29amThe cop didn’t know the law, the citizen did. He was required by law to give his name to the officer when questioned – which he did. This is basic constitutional law that the cop should have learned day 1 in the training academy.
“Show us your papers or we’ll take you downtown, take your fingerprints and ID you that way” are Gestapo tactics. I‘m surprised he didn’t get beat down for “failure to properly grovel.”
Report Post »TXBORN
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 4:29pmLook, the cop was doing his job, initially. He was contacting a person who was acting suspiciously. He was being vigilant, which is what we want our officers to do in situations like that. Laws are different state to state. In Texas, if an officer has legally detained you, you are required to ID yourself. If you don’t, it’s a violation of law. The question if this guy was legally detained is another matter. BUT, if I’m doing nothing wrong, and an officer asks for my ID, I’m just gonna give it to him. I‘m not giving out any info that’s not already in the state database. THEN, the officer should gotten his ID info and cut him loose.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:08amMany on the right want to put all cops on some kind of pedestal. A lot of cops are just bullies with badges.
Report Post »commonsenseguy
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:08amin Florida, four months ago,a woman was feeding birds in a park, she was feeding them sage, when police seen here with the bag, they assumed it was pot, they confiscated the bad,and the next day arrested her at her business, after a four months investigation, and after losing her business,home and car,the police finally got the test back on the bag, it was sage after all,she should have never been arrested in the first place.this is going to happen more and more,throw people in jail,let them prove they are innocent , not we are innocent until proven guilty, communism 101.
Report Post »kcr630
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:07amThis person should sue the MTA and the Baltimore police department for unlawful detention and harrassment. This crap has gone on long enough when law abiding citizens get hassled in this country but illegal aliens are not required to produce id. I refuse to live in a police state and we as American citizens need ot stand up and take our rights back.
Report Post »Texas Grasshopper
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 12:05pmdang ..did you a nail and the head ….you should see it down here in Texas ….dang that ID issues ticks me off…I have to provide all sorts of paperwork under force of Law but “ illegials ” do not obey laws of the land .grrrr
Report Post »tiredofprogressives
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:56amThe Middle East laughs everytime something like this occurs. WE Over React. It’s still time to be vigilant but this is insane. We act like beginners when it comes to this.
A plane flies around the Washington, DC airspace and immediately the sirens and alarms go off and the Capitol employees come running out of the building. This is embarrassing. Stop it.
Report Post »Evileye
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:56amI have taken picture of my travel all over the USA and Japan.
Report Post »I guess this ends my travel logs.
I am 80 years old and cannot belive what has happened to our freedom in this country.
Owned my first firearm at 10 years old. given to me by my grandfather on my ten birthday.
Told me if I ever pointed at anyone he would bust over my head.
I feared my father not the police.
Girl wore Cross on a chin around there neck. Nobody sent them home because of the separation of church and state.
You could start a business from scratch without 10 years of permit and law suet.
when unemployment got to high Eisenhower sent the illegal home (operation wet Back).
We had some bad thing like Segregation but we corrected them.
TexasCommonSense
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:59amI appreciate your years of knowledge and wisdom. Please keep it coming.
Report Post »satotbs
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:55amAhh, Google Earth?
Report Post »TexasCommonSense
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:13amGood point. Why bother taking your own pictures when Google does it for you and makes it available to anyone, everywhere in the world. Maybe these cops should be harassing Google instead.
Report Post »proliance
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:32amI agree. Nobody should ever leave their home without prior permission from the authorities. Get your paperwork in order or else suffer the consequences. And I wish cops would taser more people who have the gall to know the law better than they do.
Report Post »brothaslide
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:50amPeople have been taking pictures of trains for decades. Many of these folks are called “Rail Fans”. They like trains. I’m sorry but this is complete lack of judgement by the MTA Police. Plus, they violated his rights. It seems like the cop got ticked off because Fussel stood up to him.
Oh well :(
Report Post »SnowWolf
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:48amI put the blame on radical Islam…
Report Post »azsmitty
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:47amOnce again, those who are to enforce laws have no clue what the laws are. Freedom of speach, assembly, religon and to travel within the borders of the nation without papers is what distiquishes us from European countries and the rest of most of the world. We are not required to produce out passports when traveling within the country. Probable cause can warrent a stop and inquiry. If this person had been filming switching mechanisms or electrical service boxes, one could see why an officer might deem it neccessary to question their actions, but that clearly isn’t the case here. It is a fine line we tread in the age of terrorism, if we harp too much on lawenforcement regarding responding, if they are second guessed on every encounter they are involved in, they may deem it too much of a hassle and ignor it. That is what terrorists look for………..a ***** in the armor that they can exploit.
Report Post »commonsenseguy
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:45amhe should have gave them his i d , then told then to screw off, m t a , just goes to show you have the unions and the government use their powers to control people,and how really stupid they really are,none of them even knew the law, so lets intimate people until we get our way , the number one tactic of the left, these uneducated officers should have to go back through training again,and study the law. all of this could have been avoided, by both parties, but he did have the right to take pictures,but he should have gave him his i d,then told then to take a flying leap,and screw off. the officers should have known the laws.
Report Post »rienheart
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:43amPart of Obama’s Prvate Army, better funded and better equipped than our Military, but very much less educated about our Constitution. All by design, TSA will arrest you if you follow the Constitution and speak out against their agenda. Keep feeling our “junk” and eventually you might realize how perverted you really are, and the Agenda and People you follow blindly, have led you down a path to total Dictatorship, and you will eventually be in their crosshairs too. Read History of Communism/Fascism/Totalitarism (sic). It all ends the same. Death for millions. Including you who followed them blindly.
Report Post »kreese
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:54amYou may be right—I‘ve wondered why he wasn’t asked what he meant by his private army.
Report Post »Texas Grasshopper
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:42amTo the folks who sided with the Police ….It becomes obvious that he is not there to do bad things …they should have let him go on his way after a few minutes . here is why …..the whole point is to identify and prevent a incident right ….well that became clear after only a few minutes ….so them the objective of the Police NOW HAS CHANGED . It became a battle of wills …..I have to hand it to the photographer …he handled it better then me ..
Report Post »lketchum
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:00amExcellent analysis – I wish more people saw things with such clarity.
The police were correct to check him out, and the second he was shown to be zero threat, they should have apologized for the intrusion most sincerely and moved on. Any reasonable person would have thanked them with equal courtesy and respect and no issue would have arisen.
Instead, it became a test of wills – the state‘s versus the individual’s and in each such case, the individual is supposed to win – that is the essence of the natural rights guaranteed under our Constitutional Republic.
Again, excellent analysis!
Report Post »Texas Grasshopper
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:58amGuard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined… The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778
Report Post »Texas Grasshopper
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 12:01pmI have my moments *L* thanks ( actaully pretty well versed in managing these types of Officers )
Report Post »olddog
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:40amI really don‘t think I’d waste taxpayer time and money trying to train incompetence. Why not just hire people that know how to use reason. I guess that would have to start from the top..
Report Post »Nathan-H
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:37amI am glad the Police are doing there job. They didnt beat the guy up. He looked suspicious, make sense.
Report Post »Opinionmonger
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:15amRather stupid way to get your sit-pics for a terrorist act that way, don’t you think?
Report Post »Try google-maps satellite imagary , they are more detailed anyway and do sourround pictures to and give the exact GPS locations to boot.
That is a lot more useful than a consumer cam can ever give as an sit-oversight.
A well, only the stupid need to apply for those “goon jobs” I presume.
Showtime
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:38amIt’s not a crime to “look suspicious.“ There is a difference between ”looking suspicious” and engaging in a hobby one enjoys and being harassed by the MTA because they just don’t like what one is doing. The man broke no laws and knew he had broken no laws.
It pays to pull the shredded fragments of our Constitution out of the trash and piece them back together sometimes.
Report Post »Susan Harkins
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 12:33pmIf you are afraid and need a nanny, go back to your house and pay someone to take care of your pretty little self.
In the mean time, don’t try to sell the rest of us AMERICANS on a full-fledged “nanny/police state”.
Report Post »Zoe
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:34amThe hearing impaired man seemed to interact just fine with law enforcement. If he has nothing to hide & playing games with the cops, he is part of the problem.
Report Post »tomloy
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:33amPersonally, I’d fire these two officers. Just for a lack of common sense if not for being idiots.
Report Post »devilhasforktongue
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 4:03pmWhy because they stopped a white man who was impaired? But if they would have stopped an Middle Eastern then it would have been fine because they were more than likely terrorist? Go put your head in the toilet and flush…
Report Post »Vickie Dhaene
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:33amIs somebody going to tell me we have Not turned into a communist police state? We better figure a way to get our FREEDOMS back., or we are lost forever.
Report Post »devilhasforktongue
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 4:02pmIf we did turn into a communist police state then none of your comments would be getting posted and half of the bloggers would have disappeared by now…
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:33amSee how quickly all of this government intrusiveness and “over-kill” will get out of hand!
Report Post »vennoye
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 12:05pmThe old saying, “Give them an inch and they will take a mile” was not made up without an example!!
Report Post »hersey10
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:32amI understand the concern for people filming , I get it , use some discretion on who you interrogate based on the obvious threat . I applaud him for having the COURAGE to stand .
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:39amNext thing you know, you won’t be able to take photos of your children or your car or your friends or anything else. After all, there COULD BE something nefarious behind it….. Jeez. No wonder my husband left Maryland. He said the people in Baltimore city are affectionately known as Baltimorons. Now I can see why.
Report Post »SavingtheRepublic.com
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:44am^____^____^
Welcome to the Police State. So many are expecting some drastic event or actions they have seen in movies to take place in reality. It wont, the sci-fi world of ‘V for Vendetta’, ‘1984’ etc wont be introduced in some dramatic event; instead their fascist attributes are being rolled in subtly over a long period of time. Just as the communist plan is to take over slowly quietly, ease in so it becomes accepted as its just part of the daily routine.
Look at it from a kids perspective they dont know the world as we all do. We all remember the days when you went to the airport, walked through security in 2 secs. Lets not forget how we were once able to go to the gate without a ticket to greet arriving friends, family etc. They are now being conditioned for full body search.
The radicals know this, they know their old plans dont work so they must create laws and regs to herd us into conformity. So are you going to continue being sheep, or change the rules of the game and become the wolf?
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:45am@Hersey10
Indeed, it is good he had the courage to take a stand for his rights; the fact is we have yet one more example of hot headed security using the Patriot act and such to try and dominate those around them and we all need to stand for what is right and good and true. This kind of harrassments will just keep occuring with more frequency in the near future as the administration cranks up the pressure on us all.
Report Post »PrfctlyFrank
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:47amOK now lets think rationally here.. Another consideration in this incident is profiling, in which I firmly believe.. This guy was profiled.. So what? No harm, no foul, nothing to see, sorry about the delay but we do have to take precautions and as distasteful as this incident is it’s done and nobody got hurt.
Report Post »lovenfl3
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:54amDon’t forget how Obama trashed George Bush over the Patriot Act. So for sure Barack got rid of the bill…..right? Nope, he made it even more intrusive. How’s that hope and change working out for you libs? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXvykO3qVF4 Everything about the Obama family equals hypocrisy.
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:00amNazi Police State Thugs hate cameras.
The camera is a weapon. Use it.
Use it against the Police State Thugs. Get right up to them and video record their face and post it on YouTube. They hate it so much, it’s like showing a mirror to a Medusa, or exposing the vampire to sunlight.
It’s like shining sunlight on a Gremlin.
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:00amWhat BS! He can’t, but Google can. Tyranny.
Report Post »D0ntTread0nMe
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:02amHoly cow… this is the slippery slope we are going down. When Fake laws are put in an ordinary citizens face in order to scare him and make him, what? confess?? they looked bored and needed something to make their day more interesting. All it does is make me mad though.
Report Post »http://www.mythoughtsfromthemiddle.blogspot.com
TexasCommonSense
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:03amlovenfl3, let us not forget, it was Obama’s VP candidate who basically wrote the Patriot Act in the first place, in 1995.
Report Post »The Big Pickle
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:05amActually, the cops are well within their rights to ask for identification. What’s the big deal…just show them your identification and move on, you ignorant dunce!
Report Post »omgfolks
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:08amJust another example of abuse of power by the police department. He had no just cause to even apporach this man, yet he did anyway,(abuse). Demanding and ID from this citizen for no reason, (Abuse). Quoting The Patriat Act, (abuse) threatening to arrest, abuse. Police today are getting way too aggresive with their actions and nothing is being done, this cop is worried about his picture being taken in public. and what about the woman who was walking on the tracks while officer anit photo is harrassing this citizen.
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:11amI would understand the concern if her were wearing Middle-Eastern clothes or looked Middle-Eastern, but these knuckle-heads do not do that. Training IS indeed in order.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:25amThis isn’t the America of our fathers and mothers … this is now a police state .. I hope more people wake up to that fact.
2012 TEA!
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:27amKudos to this guy for remaining calm and knowing his rights. Most people would not handle the hassle and just stop and go on and let guys guys believe they are in the right to harrass people erroneously.
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:31amwhile stations are not immune, by any means, I suspect the easier target would be the thousands of miles of track that is completely unprotected. We need a technology that senses when track integrity is compromised. Perhaps sensors positioned along the track that sense changes in conductivity, or cameras that sense changes in high-res images, or drones that inspect track daily. I know electrical companies and gasline operators fly aircraft along their lines to look for ‘right-of-way’ infringements. Maybe us drones or blimps. I dunno – but I am sure we could do something more than we do now.
Arresting people for taking pictures is probably not going to be the answer, I suspect.
BTW: I’m not stirred either way by the fact the man was hearing impaired. He’s another guy. Could of happened to you or me if we snapped a pic of something or someone.
Report Post »proliance
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:36am@Bigpickle: Instead of calling people names, why don’t you spend that time looking up the law. You are required to give your info to the police when asked. Verbally giving that information to the police is perfectly acceptable. If he had been driving his car and and was pulled over for a traffic violation the he would have to show his driver’s license. Most of here were able to understand that he wasn’t in a car.
Report Post »MidWestMom
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:37amThese type incidents are becoming more and more frequent & will continue to. Unless things change, at some point these morons and the TSA etc will be given the authority to use “deadly force” if necessary for non-compliance….. remember, its for our own safety.
Then the choice will be between a government issued ear tag, like the good cattle they demand….. or shooting back.
Report Post »wither
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:46amFunny. I don’t see the point. Could you let the rest of us know why there would be a concern in a free country?
Report Post »AwwwYeah
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:55amThe bottom line is that, yes, the police have a job to do, and sometimes a difficult job, BUT they must do their job within the confines of existing laws.
Being a citizen and knowing and standing up for your rights is also a tough job sometimes. Especially, when you’re surrounded by 4 or 5 officers and they keep telling you things about the law that you know, or might only be half sure, aren’t true.
It takes responsibility by both parties to know and understand the rights of citizens. In this specific case, the cops were wrong. Unfortunately, that’s becoming a little too common in America.
Report Post »Kai Wan
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 12:04pmSo i see pickle is a bend over and just take it kinda of guy……. pathetic pos.
Report Post »Oldphoto678
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 12:28pm@PrfctlyFrank
So I guess in your mind it‘s ok to trample on someones constitutional rights if it’s just for a short time.
Report Post »Susan Harkins
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 12:30pmThe Big Pickle
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 11:05am
Actually, the cops are well within their rights to ask for identification. What’s the big deal…just show them your identification and move on, you ignorant dunce!
—–
Pickle is a little slow. Ok Pickle…let’s revisit the article again…
“This is not South Africa under apartheid and in this country, police do not have the right to walk up to you and demand you produce identification to them,” David Rocah of the ACLU told the station.
You sound as dense as those 80 IQ police officers. Do you get it NOW, Pickle?
Report Post »Susan Harkins
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 12:38pmPersonally, I liked his response to the officers’ statement about not being recorded without consent. The guy continues recording, and says that he will step away so that the officer will not get recorded. That put the officer in check for forcing himself upon the recording device, yet demanding not to be recorded at the same time. ROFL!
And then, the MTA acknowledges that additional training is in order: “We’ll look at our training processes, we’ll look at whether any administrative situations need to occur with those officers,” Wells said.
Hey Wells — give these bozo police officers of yours a crash course in THE CONSTITUTION while you are at it. Seems like the FLUNKED AMERICAN HISTORY & CIVICS in high school!
Report Post »politicaljules
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 1:28pmSimilar thing happened to me. In the Dallas Convention center I was taking pictures and security guards about 50 yards away were telling me to stop. It was crowded and hard to hear people from that far away especially when you are engrossed in taking pictures. They almost tackled me to repossess my camera. Of course I am a wimp and did not resist. I was shocked. I was even a paid convention goer and had my badge. They did not care.
Report Post »kennyg933
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 1:29pmGet used to it. As the pigs multiply, get better armaments to use against the people, and mobilze against the people after their daily roll call, this is going to be routine. In the end the people lose. We’ve already lost. And now that “Hope and Change’ re-upped the criminal fraud of the Patriot Act, there’s no limit to the police state. I say provok ethe cops to the point of creating an opportunity to expose their crimes of abuse of power and their tyranny. Photograph THEM-everywhere. Follow them to where they commit their crimes, their abuses of power, their misappropriations of your stolen tax money. If you see them having coffee out of their jurisdiction, photograph the car. Photograph the cop. Videotape the harassment you will get. They are no longer serving and protecting YOU, but the oligarcy to which you are subjugated. Give them no quarter. Get them fired, it you can. Complain to your alderperson, city council, etc. Befriend a good reporter and feed them your stories. Expose, expose expose. Stand tall for your freedom, atop the head of such swine, if that’s what it takes.
Report Post »TNT1
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 1:51pm@ pickle Then you shouldn’t have a problem with the Arizona law Right????
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 3:21pmDid you hear the officer say “Patriot Acts says…”? This is the kind of thing that results from un-Constitutional mandates by the government. Remember some of our so-called conservative members of Congress (West, Bachmann, & others) recently voted in favor of the Patriot Act. I’m a police officer and I think this is garbage. Unfortunately the transit officers are given orders based on the “Patriot Act” to investigate photographers of transit property so I can’t totally fault them but the whole thing stinks and is embarassing to watch from a law enforcement perspective. If you agree that this kind of violation of the Fourth Amendment is wrong, you should vote for Ron Paul.
Report Post »devilhasforktongue
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 4:00pmShut up Biohazard23 because if the guy was Middle Eastern everyone would want him jailed…
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 4:50pmHmm, no attacks against me for criticizing the Police State Thugs this time…
Perhaps people are finally waking up…or perhaps only the most stark infringement of our civil rights will stir people out of their propaganda-induced stupor…
Resist the Police State.
Abolish the TSA. Abolish the Police.
Report Post »GODSAMERICA
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 4:58pmAmen hersey10
I’m not real big on people suing other people but I think that this would a good one to sue on just to make these thugs think twice about harrassing people like that again.
Report Post »@ Coyote2
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 6:09pmWith the jews running everything it can only get worse. We ain’t seen notin yet!!!
Report Post »restorehope
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 10:49pmHad to laugh at the ACLU guy who insisted that this is not South Africa where they have the right to demand ID’s if they so desire. Who is he kidding? If the left isn’t stopped, that is precisely what will happen in America. They are groping our bodies in airports already. Other Gestapo tactics are sure to follow if this administration is not given the boot in 2012.
Report Post »