Politics

Barry Manilow Agrees With ‘Just About Everything’ Ron Paul Says

Barry Manilow Agrees With Just About Everything Ron Paul Says
Grammy award-winning musician Barry Manilow apparently agrees with “just about everything” GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul says and confirmed to the Daily Caller in an interview Thursday that he was a contributor to Paul’s last campaign for president.

“I like him. I like what he says, I do. I like what he says. I think he’s solid. I agree with just about everything he says. What can I tell you?” Manilow stated.

Watch the clip below:

Comments (140)

1 2 3
  • elphi43
    Posted on September 16, 2011 at 12:10am

    Barry, I think you understand.

    Report Post » elphi43  
  • spreadcommonsensenot pc
    Posted on September 16, 2011 at 12:03am

    Shoot—-he makes the music that the WHOLE world sings…………….yep

    Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 12:25am

      Yes ..and he should stick to music .. Barry is the COWARD that wouldn’t go on “The View” because of Elisabeth Hasselbeck!

      Report Post »  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 12:54am

      i agree too Barry. Now, PLEASE write and sing a song for him. let’s get Ron elected!

      Report Post »  
    • Detroit paperboy
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 2:47am

      Obammy , you came and u took without given
      But we sent u away obammmy.~~~~~~~~

      Report Post »  
    • noone222
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 3:53am

      I agree … the whole world should sing “RON PAUL” in 2012.

      [ CATB - you're a moron just like Elizabeth Hasselbeck - RINOs suck !]

      Scew em all – Vote Ron Paul – 2012

      Report Post » noone222  
    • blue_sky
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 4:40am

      Some people totally agree with Ron Paul.
      Some disagree with him on some issues – war, abortion, free-market, bail out, torture.

      Agree or disagree, you can TRUST Ron Paul that he will not change his position to please the establishment or special interests. Ron Paul is solid, not for sale.
      .
      For a politician that is unheard of. Vote for this man, he is the American people’s choice!

      Report Post »  
    • qpwillie
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 7:03am

      blue_sky,
      0bama also will not change his position. That’s why we are in this mess.

      Report Post » qpwillie  
    • cosette
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 7:41am

      During the 2008 election cycle this has- been contributed to the Mullah and Hillary. After the Mullah won, I remember seeing Manilo on some program lavishing him with praise and adulation (gag). He’s obviously a victim of political dyslexia.

      Report Post »  
    • ClassicalLiberal
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 8:54am

      That is good to hear.

      RP 2012

      Report Post » ClassicalLiberal  
    • S_Malc13
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 9:57am

      JB Kids, there IS a Ron Paul song!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiKh9Ko3mw4

      Report Post » S_Malc13  
    • ltb
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 10:51am

      How can you not be sure about Obamacare and want the CDC to receive funding for research that should be left to the private sector, then say you agree with almost everything Ron Paul says? That’s like saying, “I’m on the fence about socialism and I want the government to stay out of my life, but dogonit I agree with just about everything that Barak Obama says.”

      Report Post » ltb  
    • A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
      Posted on September 17, 2011 at 7:25am

      @blue_sky,

      “Some disagree with him on some issues – war, abortion, free-market, bail out, torture.”

      Ron Paul is not pro-abortion. Were he a governor, he would oppose abortion in his State because abortion is murder.

      Rather, Ron Paul‘s position is that laws concerning crime are not part of the federal government’s enumerated powers. Therefore, only States can set laws on abortion, or any other crime.

      See here:

      Thought Controllers Call Ron Paul “Extreme”
      (on the topic of Abortion)
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FFhSr1A1do#t=04m55s

      Report Post »  
  • blackeyerat
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 11:59pm

    now i have another reason why i like Barry Manilow

    Report Post » blackeyerat  
    • SHvnDave
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 1:02am

      Barry endorses Ron Paul …..while he is in Washington trying to get the government to spend hard earned taxpayer dollars on his favorite little project. I wonder if Ron Paul will be voting for that house bill?

      Report Post » SHvnDave  
  • The-Monk
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 11:56pm

    Barry who?

    Report Post » The-Monk  
    • mrfunn
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 7:27am

      Good question.

      How does a guy who has “been a big supporter over the years of U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer”, now say he “Agrees With ‘Just About Everything’ Ron Paul Says”???

      Manilow sparks political feud with TV show – Reuters Sep 17, 2007

      “Manilow has been a generous contributor to Democratic Party candidates, according to data compiled by the Federal Election Commission.

      This year, he contributed the maximum-allowable $2,300 each to the presidential campaigns of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joseph Biden, and John Edwards, as well as to Ron Paul, a maverick Texas Republican.

      He has also been a big supporter over the years of U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer, a California lawmaker on the left wing of the Democratic Party.”

      Report Post »  
    • Al Gored
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 8:21am

      From the same story:
      http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/09/17/us-manilow-idUSN1734188820070917

      ‘Pop singer Barry Manilow, a major Democratic fundraiser, said on Monday he has scrapped plans to appear on the television talk show “The View,” because he did not want to be interviewed by its conservative co-host.’

      Looks like Barry has gone through a fundamental transformation.

      There is hope that the other Barry will also go through a fundamental transformation to become a Republican. There is hope the Mooslems that want to convert us or kill us and take over the world will fundamentally transform to peace loving, civilized people that say, can’t we all just get along?

      Nope, no hope.

      Report Post »  
  • Mr. Oshawott
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 11:53pm

    I‘m satisfied that Barry Manilow is endorsing most of Ron Paul’s viewpoints. That said, I never base my vote on the suggestion of a celebrity. I came to my conclusion after reading Ron Paul’s “Liberty Defined” and watching a few YouTube videos featuring him.

    Report Post » Mr. Oshawott  
  • AZindependent
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 11:49pm

    Just another attempt by Glenn Beck and the Blaze to marginalize Ron Paul by headlining some has been singer/song writer’s two second comment about supporting Ron Paul. Why didn’t the headline read, “Manilow Begs Congress for more CDC Grant Money”? Why hasn‘t the blaze posted the Youtube video of Peter Schiff’s (a Ron Paul economic adviser and supporter) recent testimony to Congress on the Obama Jobs Act bill. If you have not seen it, take the time to watch it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BHLguFEN3M&list=FLDqTwQ_Aj90G1wgtmXVbQxA&index=1

    Report Post »  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 2:11am

      Great Link!

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
    • noone222
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 3:57am

      You have Beck pegged ! The way he thinks and acts we’ll either end up with Obummer or a RINO that the Republi-CONS are pushing like a deadly drug for DOPES !

      Report Post » noone222  
    • faithkills
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 12:11pm

      Sadly Beck is a progressive.

      He’s made the first step of understanding (and preaching) that progressives are on the left and the right.

      He hasn’t made the second step of understanding that he is one.

      I don‘t think it’s ill intentioned. He is just still mired in the progressive, anti-Constitution meme. We are all taught to ignore the Constitution where we don’t like it.

      Dems and GoP both love the Constitution, except where they want to ignore it. Beck is part of that, although I think he has potential to grow beyond it. He hasn’t as of yet.

      It;s interesting where Beck will not lie about Van Jones or Obama, he does lie about Dr Paul. Dr Paul is not anti-Israel. Dr Paul is pro-Isreal. He correctly notes we give four times as much money to Israels foes as to Israel. What is wrong with wanting to stop it all?

      Report Post » faithkills  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 12:46pm

      I post all the time that BECK is great, except that he:

      a) does not yet understand what a neoconservative is, or
      b) is one.

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • rubyghost0
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 4:28pm

      Glenn now boycotts Peter Schiff because he (P) told Glenn goldline is ripping off his customers and G got offended so now refuses to acknowledge his existence, yes, even if P is spouting truth. That’s the type of fella Glenn is.

      Report Post »  
    • AZindependent
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 7:01pm

      Ruby, I forgot that Glenn is offended by the truth about one of his sponsors. That is why The Blaze has ignored my request to post the Peter Schiff appearance before the Congressional committee. I hope you took the time to watch it, he is really quite good. It‘s too bad CT didn’t elect Schiff to be their Senator, oh well their bad. The federal government takes in about 2.4 trillion and is 15 trillion in debt, so at a blended interest rate of about 15% all their revenue would go to pay interest on the debt. This would leave ZERO money for anything else, no social security, no medicare, no defense spending, etc… We are so screwed, and most people don’t even know it. Ron Paul and Peter Schiff do, and I think Glenn Beck knows it, too.

      Report Post »  
    • UnreconstructedLibertarian
      Posted on September 17, 2011 at 10:05pm

      Ron Paul and Peter Schiff are two of the best truth-dealers out there. Sometimes I think Glenn hung around O’Reilly just long enough to contract infectious egomania. Egomaniacs don’t like competition.

      I personally believe the most dangerous association Glenn has, is with David Barton – the unapologetic Theocrat.

      I also believe the Beckistan regime is unabashedly anti-Ron Paul. I really don’t know why, when Glenn is on his game, both he and Ron are saying the same things. Same regarding Schiff’s economic analysis.

      I will also have to admit, the “Underwriter” concept is kinda ******* me off. I thought GBTV was to be funded by “the viewer” and beholden to nobody. So much for that.

      Report Post » UnreconstructedLibertarian  
    • UnreconstructedLibertarian
      Posted on September 17, 2011 at 11:05pm

      A good introduction to Peter Schiff – laying down some harsh truth to Congress.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BHLguFEN3M&feature=feedf

      Report Post » UnreconstructedLibertarian  
  • truthseekerusa
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 11:26pm

    Does anyone actually care what or who these celebrities support? Remember how many celebrities supported Obama and as as Herman Cain asks, “How do you like that now?”

    Report Post »  
    • young conservative
      Posted on September 15, 2011 at 11:28pm

      still, Ron Paul could use some media coverage lol!

      Report Post » young conservative  
    • Mimi24
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 12:12am

      I like Herman Cain very much. I truly wish that he had been elected rather than Obama. I don’t know how many great men and women will suffer for the Obama stain. Not fair but that’s how it works. I just don’t know how we got our first black president and our first female ( Michelle) president in the same election.

      Report Post »  
    • frosty7530
      Posted on September 24, 2011 at 10:55am

      I would not look up to an entertainer to inform me re politics. There are exceptions, like Reagan & Schwartznegger, from time to time. Many of these entertainers are not well educated or bright, we do get a Bob Dylan on rare occasion, but Mr. Dylan prefers to influence us solely by his music, he is not “out there” endorsing candidates like Manilow. Mick Jager attended London School of Economics, very bright man but does not impose his views on his fans. Sadly, Manilow has some of the most rabid fans of any pop star. They would follow him tot River Styx if he gave “the sign”. As a Jew I am very disgusted with his public endorsement of Ron Paul. I ask Jews who think Dr. Paul may be OK to look carefully at his history. Israel is not perfect, but I love my faith & my spiritual homeland. These are bad times for Jewish people. Manilow reminds me of some of the “Jews” in Wiemer Germany. I used to enjoy some of his songs, now he gives me the creeps. I seem to recall him, in one of his bios as describing himself as a “seeker”, kind of avoiding his Jewish background. He also has a grandmother, if I recall who is Irish Catholic, so perhaps his Jewish identity is not that strong. He is American & free to choose as he pleases. Yet this is a dark time for Israel, it was very insensitive of him to be so public of Dr. Paul. I am truthfully very shocked & repulsed by his endorsement of Paul. His music will never sound good to me again.

      Report Post »  
  • Mackerel
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 11:07pm

    I’m sure Ron Paul would rather have a stud like Richard Simmons speaking on his behalf rather than some wimp like Barry Manilow.

    Report Post » Mackerel  
    • Common.Cents
      Posted on September 15, 2011 at 11:36pm

      I like Manilow… Oh Mandy at the copacabana.

      Stilll… Who cares who he likes for president? I have my own brain, and common sense. I know who I like without someone telling me who to like.

      Report Post » Common.Cents  
  • YepImaConservative
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:57pm

    A young Congressman who had once been so anxious to be photographed with Ronald Reagan scampered like a Texas jackrabbit when the going got tough. In 1987, when Reagan truly needed his supporters to stand by him, Ron Paul suddenly disappeared from the man’s side. In fact, he resigned from the Republican Party and blamed Reagan for his disillusionment with the GOP. The sordid reality is that his loyalty to Ronald Reagan lasted only so long as it was politically expedient and his vaunted libertarian principles have proven to be remarkably elastic. In a letter that echoed the prevailing [Democrat talking points] of the day he wrote, “The chickens have yet to come home to roost, but they will, and America will suffer from a Reaganomics that is nothing but warmed-over Keynesianism.”

    Hmmmmm. I remember Rearend Jeremiah Wright saying something about… nah, can’t be….

    Libertarians/Ron Paul: Neo-liberals/Quasi Conservatives.

    Report Post » YepImaConservative  
    • Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
      Posted on September 15, 2011 at 11:17pm

      You’re a dolt!

      Report Post » Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool  
    • Mr. Oshawott
      Posted on September 15, 2011 at 11:40pm

      @YepImaConservative

      Based on that character-assassinating statement you just dished out, you may want to consider changing your username to “YepImaPROGRESSIVE.”

      Report Post » Mr. Oshawott  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 12:25am

      Or YEPIMANEOCONSERVATIVE.

      Look at his angry-warmonger-dude avatar that was conceived by a socialist artist who was commissioned by progressive Marxist politician !!!

      You really are an Intransigent, obstreperous moron, that incessantly bloviates incoherent, incongruous rhetoric. You should abrogate your avatar. A Ringling Bros. Barnum & Bailey Circus clown, best suits you.

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • mlcblog
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 1:04am

      Important points of fact that I had not known. Thank you. Not character assassination in my book.

      I liked the recent Mark Levin remarks to the putz Ron Paul explaining that we need to keep bases around the world as it is hard to administer democracy from our position of power and responsibility from Kansas. (My words, loose interpretation but true to the ideas being stated.) No we should not disband all our military abroad. That is stupid. This one thing alone shows me that I would never trust Ron Paul with the presidency because he has no idea who we really are. In fact, he strikes me as being not only antisemitic but sometimes, despite his seemingly strong positions on money and the Constitution, as being anti-American as well. Just my take.

      Report Post » mlcblog  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 1:54am

      @MCBLOG
      “I liked the recent Mark Levin remarks to the putz Ron Paul explaining that we need to keep bases around the world as it is hard to administer democracy from our position of power and responsibility from Kansas.”
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      Mark Levin is a brilliant, educated Neoconservative.

      Do you really hear yourself ???
      I wished Mark were here, so I could edify you both at the same time.

      MCBLOG, how do you feel about a worldwide Shari’a law?
      Probably as I do. We will have none of it !!! 0% tolerance, Correct ????
      You must understand that People are wired the same way no matter what color they are, where they come from, or what they believe !!! Have you agreed, or understood what I have told you so far ???
      OK…. here we go…..
      What in the #ell makes you think someone should have ANY tolerance of us spreading Democracy around the world ???
      You stated “administer democracy from our position of power and responsibility”.
      Where did we get such authority ???
      Mark Levin, the Brilliant Constitutional Attorney, Should know that the Constitution says our Military is for the common Defense, NOT OFFENSE !!!
      How would you like if China “Spread Communism”?

      Definition of NEOCONSERVATIVE
      1: a former liberal espousing political conservatism
      2: a conservative who advocates the assertive promotion of democracy and United States national interest in international affairs including through military means

      Tell Mark to come here

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 2:23am

      Keynesianism is liberalism. Its Gov’t spending. Some of You old farts (yep-im-an-idiot and irrationalboy) need education.

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 2:31am

      cont…

      Tell Mark to come here to continue his education !!!

      So you believe we can “administer democracy from our position of power and responsibility”
      But you are opposed if someone were to “administer Sharia Law from their position of power and responsibility”
      So we are weaker than we used to be, and are losing our “SUPERPOWER” status.
      So if China becomes more powerful soon. you will be OK with them to “administer communism from THEIR position of POWER and responsibility ? RIGHT ???
      ONE final point for you and the Constitutional genius, Mark.
      If you and Mark and ALL these other pernicious NEOCONSERVATIVES so much believe in
      “assertive promotion of democracy and United States national interest in international affairs including through military means”, then why in the hell don’t we invade Russia or China or any other “repressive” country ? Because we only PICK on WEAKER NATIONS ????
      You bet your @ss !!!!
      Class dismissed !!!!

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • noone222
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 4:13am

      RAY-GUN-ITES are simply duped morons that “imagine” themselves to be conservative … in truth they’re republi-conned into a coma that has them trying to decide whether they want their poop sandwich on white bread or rye-no !

      Last (s)-election Beck and his ilk got Obama elected because they’d spent years supporting and making excuses for “w” until voters had only Old (RYE_NO ) McCain or (White Bread) Barry to choose from. Yuk !

      Ron Paul can win if real conservatives quit being hypnotized by the spin-meisters and actually vote for him. (Even if ya have to write him in because the Re-Public-Cons are skeered to death of him).

      Screw em all – VOTE RON PAUL – 2012 – This ad paid for by Glenn the cry-baby Beck !!!

      Report Post » noone222  
    • YepImaConservative
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 6:15am

      >MLCBLOG. You’re welcome. You will notice a theme here with the unhinged Ron Paul supporters when you write anything negative about their feeble minded “dear leader.“ ”Dolt, moron, idiot” etc… lol. Boorish and childish name calling sprinkled with some Libertarian handbook spin from these 1/4 time Conservatives, 1/2 time Liberals, 1/4 time naive, all the time insulting, so-called seekers of liberty and freedom.

      I used to debate them, but don‘t waste my time anymore as they aren’t worth the effort IMO. When you’ve talked to one Ron Paul supporter, you’ve pretty much talked to them all. BORING.

      I like “your take” MLCBLOG

      Report Post » YepImaConservative  
    • YepImaConservative
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 6:26am

      Just before the Republican debate at the Reagan Library, Ron Paul released an attack ad targeting his fellow Texan and presidential aspirant Rick Perry. It shows a young Congressman Paul posing with Ronald Reagan in a series of photos and features a portentous voiceover claiming that, while Paul “stood with Reagan,” Perry was this and Perry was that. This ad is brazenly deceptive, but it does provide an edifying glimpse into the true character of Ron Paul posing as a man of principle fighting the good fight against the corrupt “prags” of the GOP establishment. It reveals that Ron Paul is a fraud of the first order.

      Report Post » YepImaConservative  
    • YepImaConservative
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 6:52am

      libertarianism is basically Marxism of the fringe Right. If Marxism is the delusion that one can run society purely on altruism and collectivism, then libertarianism is the mirror-image delusion that one can run it purely on selfishness and individualism. Society in fact requires both individualism and collectivism, both selfishness and altruism, to function. Like Marxism, libertarianism offers the fraudulent intellectual security of a complete “a priori” account of the political good without the effort of empirical investigation. Like Marxism, it aspires, overtly or covertly, to reduce social life to economics. And like Marxism, it has its historical myths and a genius for making its followers feel like an elect unbound by the moral rules of their society.

      Report Post » YepImaConservative  
    • qpwillie
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 7:28am

      Cause4Liberty,
      “Some of You old farts (yep-im-an-idiot and irrationalboy) need education.”
      Interesting – that’s exactly what Al Gore tells the young people.

      Report Post » qpwillie  
    • Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 11:42am

      YEPIMAFOOL

      You are stunningly ignorant! “Libertarianism is basically Marxism of the fringe Right” Please! Your complete misinterpretation of libertarianism is that you are mixing in Randian Objectivism’s view of selfishness. Rand was a Republican you tool!

      Libertarians are strict constitutionalists who believe in the primacy of individual freedoms… (Oh the horror!) You shouldn‘t opine on what you don’t understand, because it reveals your utter confusion and stupidity!

      Report Post » Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 4:17pm

      @Qp Willie. It’s funny because I recall al gore saying that too. But, maybe yepimanidiot should study facts instead of blazing made up opinions calling them facts. Maybe you should look into Keynesianism and correct me, where you think I’m wrong, u cant. Yepimanidiot’s last statement proves he is a nut job spewing lies and untrue misconceptions. It’s scary to think people like you will talk junk about al gore, which is completely justified, but yet you cheer on his campaign manager from the 80s. That is nafta hwy, executive order hpv, builerburg Rick perry, aka slick Rick. I guess hypocrisy runs deep. Why not vote for the only consistent American who has been a lifelong defender of liberty and the constitution as the founders intended? That candidate is the only choice, Ron Paul 2012!

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
    • YepImaConservative
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 6:06pm

      Libertarians in real life rarely live up to their own theory but tend to indulge in the pleasant parts while declining to live up to the difficult portions. They flout the drug laws but continue to collect government benefits they consider illegitimate. This is not just an accidental failing of libertarianism’s believers but an intrinsic temptation of the doctrine that sets it up to fail whenever tried, just like Marxism.

      Report Post » YepImaConservative  
    • Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 11:55pm

      YEPIMAFOOL

      Based on your inclination for stereotyping, sloppy thinking, and inherent bias, may I suggest that you join the left as I feel there penchant for ad hominem attacks would make a better home for you!

      Report Post » Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool  
    • faithkills
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 12:39pm

      He abandoned Reagan because Reagan abandoned the Constitution. Glad to know you stick to the man and not the principal.

      Reagan talked beautiful. Just like Obama. (well really much better than Obama but still) Just like Obama he did nothing to accomplish what his words said. He took the easy path of borrowing against future generations.

      I think Reagan meant well. But he was weak or misled. And Reagan didn’t end the USSR. Collectivism did. Just like it is ending the US. The USSR was terminal and nothing any US president could do could save it or kill it. Culturally they had already bought into collectivism as being the solution to collectivism. They had no one left to blame that the population would believe.

      This is why it is always claimed that the free market is to blame for everything in the US. Despite there is no free market in the US. They have to make it seems like collectivism is the alternative, when the truth is collectivism has been here for a century.

      Report Post » faithkills  
  • Rayblue
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:51pm

    I’m sold..
    Now what’s on Mott the Hooples mind ?

    Report Post » Rayblue  
    • mottdahoop
      Posted on September 15, 2011 at 11:53pm

      LOL! Their music sucks but I like the name! Okay, Barry, go write the songs. Ron Paul is nothing but an every four year distraction. He has as much of a chance of winning the the Republican nomination as I do. He and his little ropaulistinians are hilarious. But, it is getting old, adults need to be engaged in this election, not him and his little following of 14 year olds.

      Report Post »  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 3:58am

      @MOOTTHEDOPE

      You are an Idiot ! Moreover, you are not even mildly amusing !
      Who needs to be engaged in elections ? Neoconservatives ? Who is your pick for President ?
      You don’t even have the B@lls to pick one, and disclose it to me !!!
      I will actually expound on substantive issues, to come to a legitimate conjecture.
      I would not be Bloviating arcane rhetoric, as you do so well.
      I bet you really liked the Bushes. They are mendacious criminals that led our country into a long drawn-out war under the guise of “safety”. Same as any other Progressive Tyrant does, steals individual rights and liberty, to indemnify that you become a Factotum.
      This “little ropaulistinian” will be waiting for your profound, intellectual retort !!! lol

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
  • abbygirl1994
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:50pm

    I really don’t need anyone from Hollywood to try and sway me… I can remember years ago when you didn’t ask someone what party they followed.. it was nobody’s business.. Maybe that was something learned when Wilson was President, for fear of reprisal.. I am tired of the media.pushing whi they favor.. or like Oprah.. her shove of Obama was enough to turn her off completely!

    Report Post » abbygirl1994  
  • Welder
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:42pm

    Paul’s done, Obama’s done – get behind Romney \ Rubio or Perry \ Palin.

    Carry on.

    Report Post » Welder  
    • proantisocialist
      Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:46pm

      palin,paul,bachman

      Report Post » proantisocialist  
    • LibertariansUnite
      Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:50pm

      I like how the Anti Paul pundits on the blaze are rushing to make this “not important”.

      However if some arbitrary event like Muslim violence thousands of miles away from America occurs, Blazers have a kneejerk reaction that basically states we need to go to war with that country.

      Blazers make me facepalm.

      Report Post » LibertariansUnite  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on September 15, 2011 at 11:52pm

      LibertariansUnite
      Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:50pm
      I like how the Anti Paul pundits on the blaze are rushing to make this “not important”.

      So enlighten us dummies and tell us why this is important……..LOL

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • Mimi24
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 12:17am

      Or Rubio/Palin or Cain/Palin.

      Report Post »  
    • Mimi24
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 12:20am

      Not Perry ever. Al Gore had him first.

      Report Post »  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 12:30am

      RATIONAL MAN I was offer two free tickets to see Manilow when he was riding high. I will always remember the person face when I said thanks but no thanks. They couldn‘t understand how I couldn’t like Manilow. I feel the same about Paul………no thanks!

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 3:04am

      @RepubliCorp

      You crack me up!………

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 3:07am

      @RepubliCorp

      LibertariansUnite probably has the same look on his face too.

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • Trading_barracuda
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 11:21am

      Glenn Beck would rant against George Washington for counselling against waging war in far off countries. Probably because Glen Beck has never had the balls to personally wage war. He’s never had a reality check on the mass casualties that war produces.
      He’s a chicken hawk. If Glenn Beck is so in favor of waging war against Iran he should shut up, put his money where his mouth is. Pack up his family, and pay for his trip over to Iran and have at it. But he won’t. Because he‘s a chickenshit fake christian who wants to send other people’s children, spouses and parents to die while he sits on his ass and spouts off at people who like Ron Paul who have sacrificed, treasure, comfort, time with beloved family and even risked their lives for their principles.
      I challenge Glenn Beck to put up any Republican presidential candidate. Allow me to prove why they don’t measure up to Ron Paul. I challege him. There is not one in the pack who won’t inflict pain or shame on our wounded country.

      Report Post »  
  • ChiefGeorge
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:37pm

    Another bill, another cause celeb, another procurement of tax payer dollars, just trying to get more visability translates to get MORE $$$$. Agreeing with Paul will get you 000$$$, so I don’t know what to make of him….I guess one could say he is a stupid dual minded man who simply does not understand Washington.

    Report Post » ChiefGeorge  
  • dhuge67
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:33pm

    Now if only we knew who Wayne Newton supported…Lord, who cares? Lol

    Report Post »  
  • broker0101
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:33pm

    Here’s to you dozen or so tinfoil-hat idiots who reflexively reacted to this story with a full-throated “Paul/Manilow 2012!!!!” Battle Cry.

    Report Post » broker0101  
  • Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:22pm

    Excellent! And the Ron Paul Revolution keeps on growing!

    Report Post » Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool  
  • YepImaConservative
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:19pm

    Barry Manilow ~~ Crime Fighter!

    A residential and business district in Sydney Australia has been overrun by “hoons” — gangs of hooligans — who blast loud music, cruise the streets, and drive customers away with their rowdy behavior. Frustrated Australian officials have turned to the one man powerful enough to clean up the neighborhood: Barry Manilow.

    The hoons will soon find their revved-up car stereos overwhelmed by loudspeakers pumping the Manilow song catalog, a body of work that dominated the adult contemporary charts for years and includes “Brandy,“ ”Copacabana,“ and ”Looks Like We Made It.”

    Report Post » YepImaConservative  
  • I.Gaspar
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:17pm

    Is that his real face?
    Looks a lot like a Dick Tracy character.
    (Manilow, not Ron Paul)

    Report Post »  
  • ConservativeCharlie
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:16pm

    ? Its ok, Barry M represents alot of the electorate. People that are eating and breathing politics could do alot worse than Ron Paul. Least he is not like the other Entertainers and head over heals for Obama.
    Funny video for conservatives..
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-I4qwaskxg&feature=channel_video_title

    Report Post »  
  • Heitah
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:13pm

    Paul has more wisdom than all the other candidates combined. I hope everybody comes around to him. He’s a serious candidate and a serious force to wrecken with. The other candidates are too political and shifty.

    Report Post » Heitah  
    • Stoic one
      Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:19pm

      I agree, however his delivery leaves something to be desired.

      Report Post » Stoic one  
    • Ookspay
      Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:33pm

      Ron Paul has some excellent ideas. But his idealism and pure libertarian beliefs show a dangerous naivete.

      Report Post » Ookspay  
    • LibertariansUnite
      Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:48pm

      Individualism is dangerous.

      ?

      Report Post » LibertariansUnite  
    • Mr. Oshawott
      Posted on September 15, 2011 at 11:29pm

      @Ookspray

      Freedom and personal reponsibility…Dangerous? You got to be kidding, am I right?

      Report Post » Mr. Oshawott  
  • Angry Racist Hater
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:10pm

    Looks like we made it!

    Report Post » Angry Racist Hater  
  • BlahBlahBlah101
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:09pm

    When I go down the list of each candidate and their stances on issues (at least what most current stance is since most seem to change their minds with each audience) I agree with Ron on nearly everything too. Bachmann second – but I’m not convinced she means most of what she says.

    If you are not clear on Ron Pauls Foreign Policy (and that’s pretty much the issues I struggled with) read his book A Foreign Policy of Freedom, Peace, Commerce and Honest Friendship.

    Here is a nice wiki article on his positions but his books explain in so much more detail. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul

    Report Post »  
  • endgamer
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:03pm

    Barry Man-enuff finally gets it!

    Report Post » endgamer  
  • jose wasabi
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:01pm

    So do I and a lot of other American Patriots.

    Report Post » jose wasabi  
  • Angeld
    Posted on September 15, 2011 at 10:01pm

    If Ron Paul isn’t the Republican candidate, I sure hope Manilow puts his money towards any of the Rebublican candidates. Obama is out!

    Report Post »  
    • Mr. Oshawott
      Posted on September 16, 2011 at 12:10am

      @AngelD

      I obviously can’t speak for Barry, but if I were him, I would keep my money in my wallet if Ron Paul loses the presidential race. The candidates running against him are simply establishment RINOs that are conservative only when it’s convenient.

      Report Post » Mr. Oshawott  
1 2 3

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love