Beck Announces ‘We Are All Catholics Now’ Movement to Stand Up for Religious Freedom
- Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:12am by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
The controversy over the Obama administration’s contraception mandate is at a boiling point, as many Catholic leaders continue to view the president’s so-called “accommodation” as a failure to protect religious liberty.
Now, Glenn Beck is coming forward with a new movement called “We Are All Catholics Now.” The main goal of the initiative is to ask Americans to reach out to Congressional leaders (at the moment, Senators) to encourage the passage of legislation that would protect religious groups’ conscience rights.
Watch Beck discuss the effort on his radio show this morning:
The main push, Beck says, is to support the highway transportation bill, which will likely be voted upon this week. It will include an amendment – Blunt Conscience Protection Amendment – from Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) that would protect religious conscience rights. In the House, Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.) is working on companion legislation, though it may not be voted on for a few weeks.
Beck is encouraging individuals to get involved by calling their Senators and letting them know that “we are all Catholics now.” The issue at hand is not about contraception as it has been framed by many media outlets, he says. Instead, it is a religious freedom issue that hinges upon the separation of church and state’s mandate that the government not force churches to violate their values and principles.
Here are his directions for getting involved and making an impact:
Call the Capitol and speak with your Senator. The numbers are: 202.224.3121; 202.225.3121; the toll free numbers for the Capitol Switchboard include: 1-866-220-0044 1-877-851-6437, 1-800-833-6354, 1-888-355-3588, 1-866-808-0065, 1-877-762-8762, 1-800-862-5530.
Call the switchboard, ask to be connected to a Senator from your specific state (it will take two calls, one for each Senator).
Whoever answers:
1. Tell them that you want to tell the Senator to vote for the Blunt conscience protection amendment.
2. Ask them if they know how the Senator will vote on that amendment
3. Tell them you want to be contacted back about how he voted (be sure to ask for accountability — they hate it, but it makes them call you back).
4. When you call, be sure to tell them “We are all Catholics now”. This key phrase will let them know you are part of a larger, organized movement working in support of religious freedom.
You can read more about the movement at GlennBeck.com.
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 690 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 661 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 524 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 364 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 332 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 217 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 229 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order Read More- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 217 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (553)
don young
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:06amYou all don,t get it next the will come after your religion they are messing up the schools and military and you don,t think you are not next.
Report Post »SamIamTwo
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:27amMy wife’s grandfather who fought in WW1 knew about it when he was a mere teenager…he lived to be 98 and never cashed in his SS checks…NEVER. Always used his own hard earnings. When he passed we found tons of SS checks…
Draw the line in the sand and take a stand…the progressive republicans and dems need to be dethroned.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:35amThe teagenda is clear as a bell. Just look at the Personhood bills that they’re trying to pass state-wide, to date unsuccessfully, which could criminalize hormonal contraceptives. At least 50% of Republicans, 65% of Catholics, support the availability of family planning and contraceptives. The R-war on women’s rights will backfire. Happy 2012 :^)
Report Post »Steverino
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:46amTIFOSA-
Report Post »Please provide a link to this “personhood bill” you are referring to. I would appreciate it and I’m sure many others would too.
Concernd4USA
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:48am@tifosa I hope you realize this is not about contraception, almost all people are for contraception. More than half are against abortion. However this country is turning into europe rapidly where there is less religious influence. That is what this is about
Report Post »TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 12:01pm@Tifosa No it won’t. Dream on.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 12:01pmTifosa,
When confronted head on with a choice between their soul (religion) and their politics, people that believe in God will chose their soul. Libs don’t get it because their politics IS their religion.
Report Post »toto
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 12:12pmTIFOSA, I actually feel sorry for you, don’t know how someone could miss the tyranny of government control over society. On abortion, conservatives believe that unborn life is worthy of protection. I find it odd that liberals would be up in arms if women were forced to have abortions, and you can bet you would see the grissely human carcasses over and over. The truth is that it is a murderous horror that happens to the babies, not whether one should be allowed to choose it or not. The same truth is that life begins when it begins, at the beginning. It matters not what your opinion is.
Report Post »nichevo
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 12:43pmThis “war on religeous freedom” is a manufactured crock of BS to serve as an election year diversion for the party of no ideas. I’m a Catholic and I am free to vote for Obama in 2012!
Report Post »jzs
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 1:09pmYeah, we’re all Catholics now. And like real Catholics, the majority of us support of support religiously affiliated organizations having insurance that covers birth control.
AxelPhantom
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 1:17pmNichevo,
You are free also to call yourself a Catholic but when you reject the definition of the faith as defined by Dogma, as far as the Church is concerned you cease to be Catholic.
We have free will, always have, but there are also consequences to your choices. Pick one. You either support the evil in the ending of life (Politics/Obama), or you are a Catholic. You cannot have it both ways.
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 1:19pmI don’t know if this is what Tifosa was referring to but I did a Google search for “Personhood Bill” and I found this:
Anti-abortion “personhood” bill advances in Virginia
Virginia lawmakers took a step toward outlawing abortion on Tuesday by approving “personhood” legislation that grants individual rights to an embryo from the moment of conception.
The Republican-controlled House of Delegates voted 66-32 in favor of defining the word person under state law to include unborn children “from the moment of conception until birth at every stage of biological development.”
Virginia’s effort avoids involving a constitutional amendment like those states, instead seeking changes throughout the legal code, said Elizabeth Nash, public policy associate at the Washington-based Guttmacher Institute, which studies reproductive health issues.
But she said the intent is the same, with the measure ultimately aimed at banning abortion, contraception and infertility treatment.
“Should this bill become law, it could have a far-reaching impact on women’s access to health care,” Nash said. “No state, as yet, has adopted anything like this.”
You can read more here:
Report Post »http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/14/us-virginia-personhood-idUSTRE81D1ZG20120214
mkurbo
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 1:25pmBeck is wrong on this… Valarie Jarrett wants to divert public focus iaway from the economy and into social issues. Beck and most of the right are playing right into their strategy.
Report Post »tgthompson
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 1:59pmYou are not a practicing Catholic, thus you truly are’t a Catholic. You just like to make everyone think you are. But, you’re just another liberal trying to make this about contraception. This is not about contraception. Almost everyone is for contraception. The issue is not about contraception as it has been framed you liberals. It is just what Beck said, “it is a religious freedom issue that hinges upon the separation of church and state’s mandate that the government not force churches to violate their values and principles.” Go home Nichevo no one is listening to you.
If you voted for Obama in 2008 to prove you weren’t a racist, vote for somebody else in 2012 to prove you aren’t an idiot”
Report Post »jzs
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:03pmTIFOSA may have also been talking about the Mississippi personhood bill that failed.
Report Post »Wilma
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:10pmNichevo is not a real Catholic he/she is a Cafeteria Catholic. I am a practicing Catholic and support the Pope 100% on this. It is an attack on religion.
Report Post »mctoole
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:13pmTIFOSA – it has nothing to do with women’s rights. It’s about the government forcing someone to purchase something they do not want to purchase. Why do some people think they should get health care for free. If you want birth control go out and buy it yourself. Health insurance has turned into just another entitlement. That’s why the government should be out of the “charity” business.
Report Post »Lucy Larue
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:22pmDON YOUNG,
Report Post »What you are paralleling is the famous”First they came for the Jews…,but I was not Jewish.., so I did NOTHING. It ends with….,and then they came for me.
Merci for your post.
FaithFamilyandFriends
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:47pm“God who gave us life, Gave us Liberty” Let’s leave that fact alone. We’ve got enough lies taking over our country….
Report Post »http://whitepinepatriot.storenvy.com/products/133626-liberty
PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 3:27pmLet me guess Beck. Your saying that because your crazy wacked out Rick Santorum is Catholic. Catholic and Christians are not the same. So nice try.
Report Post »Ortho
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 3:28pm@TIFOSA…First we all know you are a troll and you have no interest in the truth. This may be fun and games for you because today it is about the teachings of the Catholic Church. What you fail to realize is tomorrow it may be a “forced allegiance “to an unknown entity. You see it isn’t about the particular issue as much as it is about “power” and your loss of rights. If they can force everyone to provide contraception I suppose they can also force everyone to use it. You are giving away your own rights when you agree with this. Just because the issue doesn’t affect you today, the next one may. Good Luck with that.
Report Post »May God Bless Our United States
zorro
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 3:49pmjzs
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 1:09pm
Yeah, we’re all Catholics now. And like real Catholics, the majority of us support of support religiously affiliated organizations having insurance that covers birth control.
=================================
JZS….we talked about this. Where is your proof? It’s actually quite the contrary. Most of us who work for religious institution DO NOT SUPPORT the government forcing them to buy anything. We may support the contraception itself but not the fact the government can make you do it. Stop spreading lies, please.
Report Post »Jeff65
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 3:50pmThe strange thing about the “personhood” bill is that an unborn child is already considered a life from conception when it comes to legal liability of a doctor harming the baby or in a car accident or if another person punches the women and the child dies.
It’s nice to live in a country with such huge contradictions as this. I feel civilized.
Report Post »downthewell
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 3:52pmLittle Glenneth, the drama queen, always looking to create a cause so he can use it to elevate himself and his crappy career. This is just another one of his bogus efforts to look noble and like some sort of crusader. What a joke.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 4:26pmZorro, “A majority of Catholic voters in the poll were at odds with the church’s official stance, agreeing with most other voters that religiously affiliated employers should offer health insurance that provides contraception.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/15/us/politics/poll-finds-support-for-contraception-policy-and-gay-couples.html?_r=1
Also, “Roughly 6-in-10 Catholics (58%) believe that employers should be required to provide their employees with health care plans that cover contraception.”
http://publicreligion.org/research/2012/02/january-tracking-poll-2012/
Report Post »essay
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 5:20pmTalk about can’t see the forest for the trees… Do you idiots not see that this doesn’t have ANYTHING to do with contraceptives or birth control or abortions being made available? It’s about your throwing your God given rights as individuals away with both hands!!! I am apalled at the stupidity of people who post their contraceptive beliefs as a response to this article. Go back to watching real housewives of somewhere and leave the thinking to the grownups!
Report Post »allamericanpatriot
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 5:52pmtalked to my missouri sen. office. claire mc caskill’s office was down right rude and tried to make this a contraception issue. they informed me that she was pro-choice. so asked them if they thought this was about contraception and they said yes! so i asked them if claire believed in freedom and they said of course she did. i asked if claire took an oath to defend and protect our freeedom. they said she did. they also tolded me she was catholic. so given that she took an oath to protect freedom and she is catholic..wouldn’t one “assume” she would vote yes? i asked them if they would have claire get back to me and they said she would not unless i wrote her a letter. asked them if they knew who paid their salaries. all in all claire will not it sounded like claire will choose to step on religion. also stated to her staff “we are all catholic now”. must keep up the “good” fight.
Report Post »ahberns
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 6:02pmThey will only come after the judao/christian ones. Either they are afraid of the moslims or they condone them. either way they won’t go after them
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 6:15pmLOL…war on women’s rights TIFOSA? I appreciate your reciting the Media Matters issued line sweetie but can’t you come up with something that has some believability? Let‘s try Obama’s war on the first amendment instead. What’s that blossom? You won’t discuss that? Well of course you won’t…that pesky constitution keeps getting in your way doesn’t it? Even your sock puppet Obama bemoans the restrictions the constitution places on him. Isnt’ this why you and the rest of your lefty friends are at war with the constitution tulip?
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 6:31pmJZS…I call you an idiot because you are one. You accuse others of regurgitating what their supposed mouthpieces give them yet you’re the biggest offender.
Report Post »Case in point:
Regarding your link to the Public Religion Research Institute which your keepers ordered you to use. Who are the Public Religion Research Institute? The Public Religion Research Institute spreads its hard left socialist views as the tired old liberal canard…social justice. The Chairman of the Board of the PRRI is Rabbi David Sapperstein, an OBAMA APPOINTEE to the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships who also serves on the board of People For The American Way, a GEORGE SOROS and TIDES FOUNDATION funded political action organization. PRRI’s surveys are regarded as heavily biased non-sense.
You’re an odious little troll JZS. You keep trying to present yourself as clever but you keep stumbling on your own idiocy. You‘re an idiot of the first order and an insult to one’s intelligence.
AvengerK
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 6:39pmLadies and Gentlemen….please disregard JZS’ link to the The Public Religion Research Institute “survey”. Even a quick research of the organization and you‘ll find it’s Chairman , Rabbi David Sapperstein is an OBAMA APPOINTEE who sat on Obama’s “faith based and neighborhood partnerships”. Sapperstein sits on the board of People for the American Way which is a political organization funded by lo and behold..GEORGE SOROS and his TIDES FOUNDATION. ALWAYS with JZS, you should never believe anything he presents. He will accuse you of reciting “right wing” mouthpiece lines while he himself offers nothing but left wing mouthpieces. He’s a lefty troll of the first order and cannot be trusted at all. Add to that, he‘s probably the biggest dullard you’ll ever encounter, the man is a complete idiot.
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 6:56pmtifosa you are so full of crap, I don’t know where to begin. Personhood only defines at which point a baby becomes a person with rights; we say at conception. Personhood is used to prevent so many aborted babies.
I don’t care if you use contraception, I don’t care if you use the morning after pill. We are trying to stop women from KILLING their babies. You can sugar-coat your reasons for condoning abortion all you want, but it does not change the FACT you are KILLING the baby. No woman has the right to do this any more than a man has the right to kill his wife who is pregnant.
Report Post »donbrending
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 8:44pmBy a margin of 66 percent to 26 percent the American people agree with Pres. Obama on this topic. You people on the far right are giving him 4 more years because just the few on the edge like you are an affront to most Americans. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:47pmThe Non-Catholics may be with Catholics Now But The Question Is How Many Real Catholics Are Now With The Catholics.
As was done with the Pro Life struggle, the Catholic Bishops were basically silent and neutral. Catholic Bishops were in the front of the Affirmative Action marches across the nation be could not be found at Pro-Life Marches. I hear and see the Catholic Bishops with the same reaction to the Obama abortion orders as was the reaction to Obama. The Catholic Church needs the Federal Government hand outs for Catholic hospitals, colleges, schools, and Catholic Charities.
Report Post »yiska8
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:51pmDevout Catholics do not use contraception anyway. They teach responsible family planning. Big difference. But, since most do not participate in pre-marital counseling or family planning education these days, I can clearly see how the left is using this issue to scream about women’s rights and entitlement to birth control. They want to use America’s ignorance about the Catholic beliefs and practices in order cloak and use the smoke and mirrors yet again, to deceive the fact that this issue is about chipping away against Catholic institutions and henceforth, religion, faith, and another Constitutional right. This isn’t about birth control. It’s about the United States government dictating to a specific religious organization, the Catholic Church. The whole reason people came here in the first place was because they chose to kneel before God freely and not before a King. You are either with us Catholics or or not people. Next they’ll come for the Baptists, Mormons, Lutherans, Methodists, Presbyterian or whatever part of the Christian faith you ascribe to. If they can tell the Catholic Church what to do, then what chance do the rest of you have? This President has proven himself Anti-Semitic, and in totality, Anti-Religion and Anti-Faith. Everyone cross themselves, my new Catholic brothers and sisters in faith. Welcome to the fight.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:56pmThey have trampled on the 4th amendment with the Patriot Act, the 5th amendment with NDAA, and they are looking towards the 2nd amendment with the help of the U.N. Check out every elected official, and every candidate for office, to see what their beliefs and record is on the 2nd amendment. If they are below an “A” rating according to Gun Owners of America, get rid of them.
http://gunowners.org/a112310.htm
Report Post »jhaydeng
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:20pmMy senator is Chuck Schumer. Do you think that he would sign on?
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:09pmmkurbo is spot on ya’ll.
Report Post »This is a big smokescreen and distraction from the real problems. Glenn has over-reacted as usual. The federal govt has been mandating all sorts of crazy things for a long time. If they can mandate mental health, acupuncture, etc then they can mandate contraception. Glenn has played right into gingrich/santorum ploy for more attention. The real issue is whether the federal government can mandate ANYTHING on your health insurance coverage. If only we had a candidate who would get rid of ALL healthcare mandates…Oh wait, we do but he is too ‘cooky’. If only people voted their conscience
VicksVaporub
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:42pmFirst we all had to be Mormons and now Catholics? Is Beck going to convert and molest kids too?
Report Post »midwesthippie
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 6:18am…it’s about the FEDGOV forcing you to buy something??? when has the FEDGOV not(!) forced us to buy something(?). it’s what the FEDGOV does best. did you want to buy drones to fly over America? did you want a $16,000,000,000,000.00 debt that your grandkids won’t be able to pay? did you want to buy MO’s lavish vacations? Boehner’s $9 cup of coffee? the religious right wing has a strange way of picking their battles…oh, you will be forced to buy many things.
Report Post »GlennsCokeBoner
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 8:53amSAMIAMTWO: So, not for nothing, and no disrespect to you Grandfather, a veteran, but he was either stupid or senile. He may have been opposed to SS, but that was still HIS money. What did it prove to anyone by LEAVING THAT MONEY WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT?!?!
Drawing a line in the sand?! Really, now? Let me ask you something . . . who are you supporting for the GOP nomination? One of the corporate Federal Fascists or Ron Paul?
Report Post »GlennsCokeBoner
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 9:04amDon Young:
You’re right, I don’t all get it . . . I don’t get at all what this article is supposed to be about. Glenn is urging support of the national transportation Bill because of some Amendment that supports what? religious conscience?! RUFKM?!?!
Ya know its funny that Glenn professes that “we are all Catholics now” . . . because if there is one thing I know about Catholics – having grown up in an Irish Catholic home – is that they are profound hypocrites.
Just like government . . .the more rules and standards you place on how one must conduct his or her life . . . the more likely that person is to violate or even rebel against those rules and standards.
Religion is unpopular BECAUSE of people like Glenn who want to legislate religious based moral codes into public law.
Religious freedom is religious freedom. If Christians and Muslims actually practiced what they preached and policed themselves sufficiently enough – no one would gives a rats ass whether or not knelt down at a pew in a cathedral or on a mat in a mosque.
But having religious freedom isn’t enough for you folks – you long ago hijacked the GOP and have attempted to convert you religious revelations into legislated laws.
You better wise up and change your tune before folks like me get really pissed and decide religious freedom means your Church paying its fair share of taxes.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 11:41amDONBRENDING…source for your numbers please.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 11:49amGLENNSCOKE….yes of course…let’s talk about the validity of religion or what the heck Glenn Beck is saying..anything but a president trampling on the first amendment right? This isnt’ about Catholics, this isnt‘ about women’s rights, this isn’t about “free” contraceptives. This is about a president and an adminiistration that is trampling all over the constitution and rather than mince words about Glenn Beck’s intentions, the validity of christianity or debate your peurile distractions I suggest you take a cold hard look at how statism is creeping up on us all. It’s no coincidence that the left has launched a propaganda assault on the constitution. It’s old, it’s outdated, it’s not pertinent to our times…ad nauseum. Heck..Obama’s bemoand the restrictions it places on him himself. It’s the only thing keeping leftists from taking and keeping power in this county and the left knows it. Meanwhile, buffoons like you want to debate the value of religion in this country. Make no mistake…this ALL about the constitution not contraceptives, women, cancer screenings or religion. Grow up kid.
Report Post »HAPPYRWE
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:41pmVote for Freedom and Vote to stop Socialism and Tyranny from completing the agenda
Vote for Ron Paul….the only man who is upholding and protecting our Constitution!
Report Post »Did not Beck call on listeners to vote for the Constitution? Read it people and learn
common sense and freedom. Vote to save the Constitution.
All candidates but Ron Paul vote for the bills that will enslave us.
What is the problem?
Research for yourselves! Question with Boldness!
Research Ron Paul on your own and listen to his words and see his voting record, pro-life,pro-commonsense, pro-America, pro-Israel, pro-Constitution, anti-Big Government Dictatorship (a King).
All other candidate are for BIG UN Government. Wake up voters!
“People’ can call Paul crazy all they want, the message is true and it is being hidden, twisted and manipulated by the progressive agenda.
Did not Beck say that both parties were the same, Progressive Party?
Now we go on to another UNdeclared war, soldiers die, more debt, loss of freedom…where does your candidate support the Constitution.
You listen to Beck yet you don’t follow his good advice?
Just his opinions?
Did he not say that progressives would take over any “religions” to fool the people.
A Christian talks, walks and votes……..don‘t just take a person’s word on it………..do the research for yourself!
Ron Paul 2012
If Liberty and the Constitution is crazy then call me crazy……….
new nostalgia
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 1:39pmYou have it correct. I am now a Catholic because I don’t approve of this action by Obama and his czars.
Report Post »HerrBeck
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 4:11pmAs a Catholic I would like to ask Herr Beck to stay away. Leave us alone, don’t mention us. Pretend we don’t exist. You left the faith to join your little cult. Worry about them. Go and hoard your food, weapons and gold, and please just leave us Christians alone.
Report Post »That the rest of you supposed Christians support this cultist is shameful.
HerrBeck
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 8:57pmWow. So many new Catholics now that the Cultist Glenn Beck has told you “we are all Catholic.”
Report Post »Well, time to get in line.
Here is a message from the Pope, the leader of the Catholic Church.
http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1004736.htm
Basically the Pope says healthcare is an inalienable right of every human, and it is the responsibility of the Governments of this planet to provide healthcare to all citizens.
So. Start backing that Universal Healthcare all of you new Catholics. Then we can get you caught up on making your communion and confirmation.
yiska8
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 9:27pm@Herrbeck
Report Post »Last time I checked, the whole point here is not contraception, but freedom of religion. Not very Christian of you for turning away Beck’s help. And freedom of religion is still a right. Glenn Beck can freely choose any religion he likes. Maybe someday he’ll rejoin the Catholic faith if, it’s still around. And the Pope is man of prayer for the world and all people, so naturally he would want no man or woman denied medical help. And in this country THAT DOESN”T HAPPEN. Anyone may walk into a hospital whether they are poor or wealthy, American or here illegally. Glenn called it on social justice within the church and though I knew this existed long before he brought it to light, I’m thankful he did so. It’s not going to matter whether you are Catholic or not when the poop starts to fly. Glenn has warned, educated, and warned again. And people like you still mock. May God be with you.
PA PATRIOT
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:01amI called Senator Casey’s Washington Office. The screener said he is not for the Contraceptive initiative, I said it is too late, He voted for the bill on December 24, 2009. he did not stand up then, I do not think he will stand up now. He must be voted out on Novmber 6, 2012.
Report Post »Ortho
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:20amMark Pryor is the last remaining Democratic Senator in Arkansas and he is totally worthless. I called and ask the questions above and his staff said he would not release a statement until after the vote. Really? He also does not allow comments to his Senatorial Face Book page, he just post his opinions about Bills allows about 3 people to comment and then it is shut off. I have written him, called him and he is worthless. He just announced he is running again for reelection. He needs to call Blanch Lincoln and ask her how her life is going. He must be defeated.
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:21ami also e-mailed my reps todd platts and toomey. i didn‘t bother with casey he’s too far in the tank for obama. and yes Casey must go with BO come november.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:27amHis father was schizophrenic on the issues too!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:31amI thought Beck said we are all Jews
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:33amI was thinking about the whole Progressive “Top down, bottom up, inside out thing” and it reminded me of another. When Jesus Christ returns in glory it will be Top down, bottom up, and the Luke-warm inside out. They are such copy-cats.
Report Post »PA PATRIOT
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:33amDuring my conversation with Senator Casey’s office, I also brought up that Casey voted with Nancy Pelosi and was immediately interrupted that he (Casey) did not side with her on this issue. I responded, “Ma’am, the way I look at it, Casey and Pelosi were in the same bed on December 24th, 2009. She was offended.
Report Post »FromLewes
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:34amCalled both my Delaware (D) senators. Neither office had any idea of what the Senator’s stand on the amendment was, but would get back to me. I told both offices this was not about contraception, but as a Catholic it was an assault on the First Amendment and they should be ashamed if they do not support the conscience clause.
Report Post »FRED BEAR
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:38amThe word Catholic means (( UNIVERSAL)) American values are also universal. …Just saying
Report Post »iupindiana
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:06amI just spoke to Casey office and he still hasn’t release his position. Useless.
Report Post »TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:48amWrote both my Senators and also Sen. McConnell. Heading was We are all Catholics now Push to Vote yes Highway Transportation Bill. The body of my letter began after the heading in which I wrote as a woman and Christian with a conscience I stand as one with Catholics, etc. Wow, how hard is that? Also I was thrilled to see Sen. Cornyn along with 42 other Senators (most I recognized as (R). but brief suggested bi partisan) has filed an Amicus Brief with SCOTUS regarding Health Care and reading some, skimming mostly I see both my Senators signed it. And it is wonderful although I didn’t fully read all of it. If you want to read it go to Sen. John Cornyn. Kaye Hutchinson had signed it. I am so proud of Texas. Thank you Glenn. Great idea. Anyone who suggests this is just a woman’s rights issue, get real.
Report Post »Lucy Larue
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:12pmAMEN! Casey is a prig! He is a wimp! He needs to be gone.
Report Post »Remember…,he voted FOR Omamacare!
Yeah he’s pro choice…,NOT!
He knew Obamacare promoted abortion. UGH!
What a PHONEY!
Lucy Larue
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 3:39pm@ VECHORIK,
Report Post »Oui…,it is called EUPHUISM. It is symbolic DOLT!
Eric_The_Red_State
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:53amYou are all going to sit around and do nothing except maybe post a note here and go back to whatever it was you were doing before.
Stop kidding yourself
The Welfare States of America are here to stay because YOU sat on your ass and did nothing.
Report Post »PA PATRIOT
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:04amYe of little faith.
Report Post »SamIamTwo
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:14amDid it days ago…but you knew that, eh? LOL
Report Post »Delta D-5-3
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:18am@PA PATRIOT…….you can say that again.
Report Post »ishka4me
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:24amI called and emailed my Senators and Congressman and was told with smug arrogance from their people that they are supporting womens’ rights. They could care less of religous freedom.
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:31americ…… we sat on our asses like you but not anymore.
Report Post »bosbes
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:44amThank you for your encouragement and your shining example. I am certain that you have done so much much more than we. You have haven’t you. Ah yes, I can see the huge difference you have made. Good for you.
Report Post »jmresler
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:11amEric, there is much truth in what you say. Now what would you recommend? What did you do?
Report Post »shogun459
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:19amWell they haven’t block a National election so in theory we can VOTE THEM OUT.
Report Post »If they do that we look to the Constitution.
They haven’t tried to disarm us yet either.
MYHEROISRON
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:49am@ERIC
I just contacted my reps, as I try to do at least once a week. So, what have you done for your country today besides sit on yer butt?
Report Post »4everconservative
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 12:10pmYou don’t speak for me. I called both loser my senators from Michigan, Stabenow and Levin. Stabenow’s person said he “didn’t know what her position was on the amendment, but would pass my comments on. I asked for accountability, meaning a call-back, and was informed that they “send a letter” with the answer. Levin’s office stated that he has not “made a public announcement” on his position, but they have had lots of calls about this, and would take my comments. I again asked for accountability, and was told it was a “comments only” line, and I would have to send a letter or email asking for the information. I work everyday to educate myself on what this government (and George Soros) is doing, and I spread that information wherever I can, getting people to wake up and do the same. Come November, we will see how much our efforts have gained us. But do NOT tell me that I am sitting on my ass – my life has been on hold the last three years while I try to save our republic one bit at a time. What are YOU doing?
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:50amI get your meaning, Beck, and I’m with you. But can’t we just say, “we’re all Americans now”, instead of Catholics? Gotta admit I’m not comfortable with that. I personally am not just sticking up for Catholics so much as America and freedom of religion and the Constitution.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:57amSo true.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:10amYou miss the point then….
Report Post »DeeDT
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:11amProblem with saying “We’re all Americans” is simply that folks from every political view use – and believe – that statement is true of them. So, in my mind, we are actually defining Constitutional values and support by using the suggested focused term.
Report Post »brknhrt
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:29amKaydee, you missed the point. I would never say I am a Catholic now any more than I would say I am a Mormon NOW. I stand for religious freedom. If Beck wants to call himself a Catholic, fine, but don’t include me.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:35amThe point is in reference to the “first they came for the….” saying. Nevemind trying to explaing some things to some people is futile
Report Post »rbcintexas
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:49amAll that Beck was saying is that although everything is directed at the Catholic Church, every religion is under attack at that the Church has taken the lead defending our Constitutional right to freedom of religion.
Report Post »marvel
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:52amDoesn’t bother me to say “I am Catholic”, meaning the religious attack on Catholics is an attack on my faith as well. I know who I am.
Report Post »randy
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:10amInstead of We’re all Catholics now, How about “I’m a Christian supporting Catholics”!
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:12amOne, (just one), of the problems I have with the, “we are all Catholics now” mantra is that Catholics overwhelmingly voted for Obama last time. I personally am not in that catagory that voted for Obama and now don’t like what he is doing to me. I am in the catagory of not voting for Obama and never liked what he has done or is doing. The focus is too centered on this one issue, in my mind, and not on the fact that Obama is trampling on the Constitution as a whole. This issue is just one stomp in the trampling process of the Constitution that Obama and the progressives are performing. I’ll stand with Catholics on this issue. But I can‘t ’identify‘ with them since I didn’t vote for Obama in the first place.
kaydeebeau is right about not being able to explain things to some people. Little did he know that he was posting about himself…………………………
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:42amAccording to Pew, 54% of Catholics voted for Obama in ‘08. Evangelicals, (the catagory I fall into), 26% voted for Obama. I can’t identify with the Catholics in as much as they got what they voted for.
http://www.pewforum.org/Politics-and-Elections/How-the-Faithful-Voted.aspx
A Majority of Catholics Got What They Voted For
http://godfatherpolitics.com/3679/a-majority-of-catholics-got-what-they-voted-for/
For Over 40 years you’ve been funding, via the Catholic Campaign for Human Development, community organizations with progressive political agendas that convinced you that your religious world and your public policy world were two separate entities. You wanted universal health care? Well, so did they. Never mind the pesky little business of abortion and family planning funding. But here it is, back at you!
Oh, wait. Not only have you been funding these guys to see that fellow progressive organizers like themselves got put into political office – think Obama – but you’ve been systematically reeducating your Catholic people to understand “social justice” in terms of precisely such organizing, with all the lovely compromises that entails. And now you’re surprised that it’s threatening your charitable activities?
Report Post »TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:59am@KayDeeBeau They do indeed miss the point. Ain’t that something?
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 12:46pm@TEXASGRANNY73
What is there about my quotes that you don’t understand?
“I personally am not just sticking up for Catholics…….”
“I’ll stand with Catholics on this issue. But I can‘t ’identify‘ with them since I didn’t vote for Obama in the first place.”
Let me guess. You are a bitter Catholic that voted for Obama and now want everyone to stand with you against him cause he is picking on you? Yes I stand with Catholics on THIS issue since it effects all of us and the foundation of America. But don’t call me a Catholic……I’m not!!
Read the article I linked above. I DO NOT stand with Catholics on supporting progressive agendas and “social justice”. The 54% of Catholic votes for Obama in ‘08 are coming back to bite them. Believe me,…..I GET IT!!……..Apearently better than you do…………….
Report Post »Guerrino_P
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 1:14pm@RATIONAL MAN
Report Post »Everyone should become Catholics because it is the only true form of Christianity. And remember, America is also a Catholic country. God Bless you all.
Babeuf
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 1:38pmGuerrino_P
That is your opinion and you are entitled to it! I disagree. However, Your remaining statement is historically inaccurate. This nation, its institutions and laws, was founded on Biblical principles basic to Christianity and to Judaism from which it flowed. No where does it state specifically “Catholic Country.”
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:14pmI hate this stinking website!!!
Report Post »This is the only website I’ve ever posted on that you cannot trust to post your comments when you click the post button. Amp up Blaze if you can’t handle the volume. I‘m sick of losing my well researched posts and have to let ridiculous statements stand unchallenged because I’m too angry to go back and re-do the post…………………………………..
Lucy Larue
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:30pmRATIONAL MAN,
Report Post »Dear GOD in heaven! What are you talking about?!
Do you not understand that “We’re All Catholics now” is just a rallying cry?
It does not turn you into a Catholic!
Stop OVERTHINKING! UGH!
Rational Man
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:43pm@Lucy Larue
Better to be an “overthinker” than a “non-thinker” like Catholics. Like Guerrino_P…………..
My original point was, PICK A BETTER “RALLYING CRY”!!
Don’t like my opinion, have a heart attack over it……I don’t care!
Report Post »goofball
zorro
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 4:09pmRational Man
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:14pm
I hate this stinking website!!!
This is the only website I’ve ever posted on that you cannot trust to post your comments when you click the post button. Amp up Blaze if you can’t handle the volume. I‘m sick of losing my well researched posts and have to let ridiculous statements stand unchallenged because I’m too angry to go back and re-do the post…………………………………..
===================================
LOL…“well researched”. You don’t even have the history right. You should go back and read the later works of Martin Luther. Most “Christians” are familiar with his early works but not his later works. When they become familiar with his later works, well, let’s just say they change their minds. These Catholics you hate so much are at the forefront of this fight. These Catholics you hate so much died so you would even have a Bible today.
Report Post »shogun459
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 5:27pmUh, they are coming for the Catholics,
Report Post »when they come for the Hindus we will all be Hindus,
when they come for Joe Sixpack that‘s who we’ll be.
COFemale
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 7:20pmkaydeebeau – I feel your pain. Some men just go through life clueless. You try to spell it out for them and they sit there and give you that dumb deer in the headlights look.
Rational Man – nobody is expecting you to say you are Catholic – HELLO
Report Post »You don’t have to even believe what they believe. Good think you didn’t name yourself Logical Man.
rose-ellen
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 7:50pmThe catholic church needs to recouple its religious mission with all its non for profit charitiable and higher educational instituions.Then it could avoid this cunnundrum.Every person hired should become a member of a religious order which would guarantee religious exemption status to that order.It would be part of the emplyment contract though members of any religion could become part of the order[hired].These instituions need to come back under the jurisdiction of the bishops and diosese even if it means less funding from the government.We can’t serve two masters and the church has tried to do that by separating the diosese from the instituions.
Report Post »Concernd4USA
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 6:32amIf his mantra was that we are sticking with catholics I would be ok with it But I will never identify with an organization that is as dangerous to religious freedom as Obama could ever be.According to wikipedia the Catholic church has killed 60 million people prior to the 20th century. Whenever this organization is in power it is as bad as radical Islam. It is as anti Jewish as well Beck should know this before he links his arms with them. If he did as much research on religion as he does on world events he would not be a Mormon and he would not link arms with Catholics. Read revelation 17 and 18. Our forefathers that were martyred are crying for revenge against this monster organization.
Report Post »I was Catholic but Revelation tells all Bible Believing Christians to come out of her lest you be a partaker of her judgement.
Stick to the news Mr Beck
midwesthippie
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 6:36am…why can’t we say “leave my America alone” and stand with Americans and the values in our constitution. why even bring religion into the fight? i’m supposed to fight for (intentional hyphen) catholic-American’s rights? why can‘t we unite against an unconstitutional FEDGOV that is trampling on ALL of America’s rights? unAmerican…unconstitutional…uncatholic???…no glenny…we are not all catholics but we are Americans…independent of ANY church.
Report Post »governmentCorruptionDestroysAmerica
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:47amI’ll stand with them for the sake of religious liberty. Perhaps they can stand with us and call for the repeal of Obamacare altogether for the sake of individual liberty. I hope to see some polls that will show that Catholics are actually turning away from Obama.
Report Post »istasko
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:09amYeah, good luck with that. If you dance with the devil…what the heck did we expect?? I tell you, I am so disillusioned toward my Catholic faith right now. The Catholic masses want their cake and then they want more cake, too.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:23amThere is some truth to the statement, “Catholics got what they deserved.” Catholics have long supported socialism/communism.
Report Post »janmil200
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:34amI agree completely and wrote a letter to my pastor telling him exactly THAT. We are expected to defend the Church, and I will, but I would expect that they would defend my freedoms as well by denouncing Obamacare. Not going to hold my breath.
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:44am@ the jerk……….. you are a jerk if you believe that catholics are for communism. we are not communist or socialist. we beleive that all people should help one another in Christ image.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:58am@cloudsofwar
Then why did Catholics vote overwhelmingly for Obama? Thus, we have the conundrum that istasko is facing above.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:52amYou make it sound like Catholics put Obama into office, here are the stats from the ’08 vote. Just so everyone can see the real stats
White evangelical Protestants under the age of 40; 33% of their votes, compared with 12% for Kerry four years earlier.
Minority Catholics 71%
Less observant Catholics 52%
Less Observant White mainline Protestants 47%
Less observant mainline white Evangelicals 38%
Other Minority Protestants voted for Obama 56%
Black Protestants voted for Obama 94%
White Mainline Protestants 47%
Observant white Catholics 41%
White observant Evangelical Protestants 20%
NONE of these numbers are good!
Report Post »VRW Conspirator
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 12:41pm@Jerk.. read the life history of Pope John Paul II – while in Poland under Nazi occupation. one of the three people credited with the destruction of the USSR (Reagan and Thatcher were the other two). Read what the Catholic Church did during WWII to protect art, history, literature, and Jews inside the Vatican. Even Hitler would not enter the Vatican grounds with force because he and his military KNEW the outcry even German’s would have against it. Did they make mistakes, did they do enough – those are other arguments to have but don’t you dare say they are communist or socialist.
Don’t mistake the TRUE form of Social Justice the RCC and most Christian churches believe in with the social justice the Progressives believe in and try to pervert the truth into with certain socialist priests and pastors. The Catholic Church and true Christian churches believe in the Body of Christ going out as INDIVIDUALS to help the poor and down trodden. Communist and Socialist believe the GOVERNMENT should take from certain people of means to help the poor and down trodden. NOT THE SAME!!
@Rational Man… good you went and finally got the TRUTH about how Catholics voted in 2008. 54% for Obama, 46% against! that is pretty darn near the same percentages the Nation voted for Obama, not overwhelming by ANY means. And you can’t just compare that to Evangelicals, do it to ALL Protestants 53% for Obama, 46% against
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1022/exit-poll-analysis-religion
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:02pm@VRW Conspirator
I compared Catholics to Evangelicals because I’m Evangelical. I don’t care what you are. My voting group had a far fewer number of fools that voted for Obama. My point is that 54% of Catholics are getting what they voted for. I can stand up for whats right on this religious freedom issue and stand with Catholics on that issue and a couple of others like abortion. But I cannot in good conscience stand with them AS a Catholic. Too much compromise with Catholics for me. They mostly appear to be fence sitters on issues that matter to me, and matter to God…………………
Report Post »zorro
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 3:58pm“They mostly appear to be fence sitters on issues that matter to me, and matter to God.”
Name one. Not one you THINK matters to God or one that matters to YOU. One that ACTUALLY matters to God and the church, as you call it, are sitting on the fence.
Report Post »Concernd4USA
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 6:49am@vrconspirator interesting that you believe that the vatican was “protecting” the Jewish artifacts. Of course they had to be sued decades later to retrieve those artifacts.Were they protecting the artifacts of the 60 million people that they killed in order to plunder their possessions. I was a catholic and a good one, but I read my Bible so maybe that makes me a bad one because catholics do not read the bible. Good thing to because their religion perverts everything in the book. Read revelation 17 and 18 where the church of Rome (Roman Catholic)is called the mother of all harlots. And the Martyrs are crying for revenge against her.
Report Post »If Beck’s mantra was that we are sticking with catholics through this I would be ok with it But I will never identify with an organization that is as dangerous to religious freedom as Obama could ever be.According to wikipedia the Catholic church has killed 60 million people prior to the 20th century. Whenever this organization is in power it is as bad as radical Islam. It is as anti Jewish as well Beck should know this before he links his arms with them. If he did as much research on religion as he does on world events he would not be a Mormon and he would not link arms with Catholics.
I was Catholic but Revelation tells all Bible Believing Christians to come out of her lest you be a partaker of her judgement. So what do you believe the Bible or your church because they do not agree with each other.
Stick to the news Mr Beck
edmundburk
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 6:27pm@CONCENED4US-You mean you took your facts about catholism from wikipeda, which allows ANYBODY post ANYTHING as your sorce of facts?! Read a book!!!
Report Post »DeeDT
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:47amUnited we stand! Supporting a cause is vital – but also knowing the details is imperative if we are to hold intelligent conversations with our neighbors.
Report Post »For those who want to know more – the text of the bill we are supporting is shown here. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s112-1467
“We are all Catholics now.”
edmundburk
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 6:53pm@CONCERNED4USA-at first I thought you were a misguided protestant, but now I see your a stinky little troll. I doubt you were a GOOD catholic, good catholics read their bible and they also know that the catholic church DID NOT kill 60 million people and they also don’t subscribe to evengelical protestant end time theories. If your a bitter ex-catholic it’s probley because you were too lazy to study
Report Post »your own religon, and by your previos postings I can tell you were. Stop blaming the catholic church for your short comings and quit posting your anti-catholic rantings!-EDMONDBURK ex-pentacostal and proud catholic.
Beeree
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:47amI thought we already had a Constitution to protect from this, what makes anybody think this would be effective? If it would happen to pass it wouldn’t be signed. If they were able to actually make it veto proof, it would immediately be challenged, go to the Supreme court eventually and would probably be struck down. After all how many people in Washington really care about Constitutionality?
Report Post »jens63
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:29amAt this point it is not likely to be struck down as it is also constituitional….
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:55am@jens63
Wrong!
Report Post »Thats the problem with Americans today. They have no idea what the Constitution really says, and what it doesn’t say. It doesn’t say government can interfere with religion or religious projects. Nor, does it say that government can force anyone or everyone to purchase anything they don‘t want as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone. The Constituition does not support federal mandates on individuals or groups or states.
YouAreMistakenSir
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 12:52pm“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” Since the mandate doesn’t only affect religion, and the issue is more directly about women’s health and only indirectly related to religion I find it unlikely that SCOTUS will throw out the law because of first amendment problems. Religion is not immune to the law. It’s got to follow the rules like everyone else. Simply because a law also to applies to a religion does not immediately mean its an issue of religious freedom.
Report Post »jens63
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 4:13pmI think my answer was perhaps convoluted, I meant that the supreme court as it currently stands would not strike down such a bill as the bill is reinforcing what is already constituitional.
Report Post »ahberns
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 8:21pmYouAreMistakenSir You are mistaken sir. You stopped short of the issue. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The operative phrase is ” prohibiting the free exercise thereof;” by forcing the church to include this coverage they essentially are prohibiting the free exercise of their doctrine.
This is the thrust of the entire argument/ It has absolutely nothing to do with birth control or abortion.
As to the argument about “We are all Catholics now” as a rallying cry, it is right up there with “Don’t tread on Me“ or ” Give me liberty or give me death” Needless to say no one wanted to be dead either.,
You people need to stop worrying about the semantics and start worrying about the problem or you will be so busy arguing about what to say Obama and company will have you in chains and you will still be debating about not being Catholic.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 5:15am@ahberns
Your so darn stupid that your trying to pick fights with people that are on your side. Do you really want to be a first class troll that bad? Or are you really just that stupid?
Report Post »MCLOVINIT
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:47amPolitical Prayer:
Report Post »“It is January 20th, 2013.
Rick Santorum is being sworn in as the new President of the United States.
I give thanks to you Almighty God, for your blessings! Thank you, Lord.”
I see it. I feel it. I believe it. It is so.
UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:24amI pray that every day!
Report Post »jens63
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:32amIn Virginia we only have Romney and Paul on the ballot for the gop primary.
Report Post »Write ins are not allowed in the primary, I am asking for all virginians to vote Paul
to keep Romney from getting extra delegates and Santorum will have some
ability to make a deal for more delegates if it is close….
momprayn
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:49amJEN — GREAT idea !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »jens63
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:00amSpread the word!
Report Post »Bro. Chuck
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:45amI pray that more people see this for what it is….
On the surface, it appears to be about “muscling” the religious institutions (and thereby the “followers”) into bowing to Obama and “his” governance…..
But actually?
I think this is more about shaking the foundations…..
think about this a moment….
if you take a weak element of the congregation…
say the women who “disobey” the pope and take birth control pills, or whatever…..
and make them ponder the “choice”….
do I want my “free” stuff?…
can the pope tell me what I can do with my body?
Is it about the “church” or is this between me and God?
we all know that a lot of folks that “profess” to be religious?
they will choose to hold on to their present mindset…
what they are “comfortable doing –
they are the ones that will “migrate” around until they can find a “congregation” that is accepting and willing to “welcome them in”…
So what happens to the mainstream religions when “mildly-commited” folks are put in the position to make that kind of decision….
do this the “church’s way” and stand firm against the government
or run to that government… because you are already in their hands, because you choose to disobey your religion’s teaching(s)
and do what YOU want….
Yes, i believe this is all about injecting the “virus” of discontent into the mainstream religions…
I pray that God opens the folks eyes so they don’t get sucked into the decep
Report Post »zorro
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 4:24pmAnd once again, putting Christians against each other. Catholics are leading the fight. That’s all Beck is saying. And yet there are all these anti-Catolic comments all over the place as if the Church were the enemy. Unfortunatly, most Christians (on both sides) are too stupid to see this. They’d rather fight amongst each other than join together as the Lord intended us to be.
Report Post »skipmontesjr
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:44amGlenn..I own one of the countries largest robocalling companies…We can have you record a message and send it out to Americans instructing them to press 1 Then once they press 1 it will drive the call to these numbers….Call me 800.308.6383..Michael
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:51amI hate you!
Report Post »booger71
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:27amDitto
Report Post »ahberns
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 8:37pmAre you guys nuts? This is one of the good guys. He has something to offer and you two are bad-mouthing him? Shame on you.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 5:11am@ahberns
Are you the one freak in the world that actually likes robo calls?….Good for you!
Report Post »The rest of the world hates them and won’t be inviting this guy over for barbeque no matter what his intentions are. Sorry!….Just goes with the territory…………..
booger71
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:43amThis mandate has nothing to do with religion Glenn, you are missing the big picture. Nobama is trying to give himself more power under the Constitution by declaring he can force a private company to give something away for free.
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:37amfirst the drug companies then the oil companies little hugo chavez. wait until gas hits 5 dollars a gallon. he’ll say he had to nationalize them for the people just like the drug companies. after all thats what obama care is nationalizing the providers and drug companies.
Report Post »Lucy Larue
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:44pmReally BOOGER71? Really?!
Report Post »The first tenet of Marxism…,first do away with their reigion.
BTW…,a really classy posting name you chose. You did. Tres degoutant.
momrules
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:43amNope, not a Catholic. I’m a Christian American who understands that our freedom is being stolen from us one step at a time by this administration.
But I will stand shoulder to shoulder with the Catholics and every other American who wants to fight tyranny.
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 1:48pmGreat Post! I feel the same way!
Report Post »palmtree
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:41amIt is about this damn president telling us what we have to do. All I have to is pay taxes and die. When does it state that since I am a catholic I should not have to what that moran Obama has to tell me what to do. Whst the hell. Hell no. Obama has over stepped his authority to tell us what to do. That is ********
Report Post »encinom
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:06amThis is a moot point, Beck is with holding the truth to get his handful of listeners worked up. Here is the fact, it was the law prior to Obama.
In December 2000, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled that companies that provided prescription drugs to their employees but didn’t provide birth control were in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prevents discrimination on the basis of sex. That opinion, which the George W. Bush administration did nothing to alter or withdraw when it took office the next month, is still in effect today—and because it relies on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, it applies to all employers with 15 or more employees. Employers that don‘t offer prescription coverage or don’t offer insurance at all are exempt, because they treat men and women equally—but under the EEOC’s interpretation of the law, you can’t offer other preventative care coverage without offering birth control coverage, too. http://motherjones.com/politics/2012/02/controversial-obama-birth-control-rule-already-law
Report Post »KAdams
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:15amConsidering that Plan B is now available OTC, where does it fall under the ‘Prescription Drug’ heading? Birth control also isn’t given via prescription. It’s given for FREE. So I guess it doesn’t count.
Report Post »PA PATRIOT
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:30am@ Encinom
(!) Withholding is one word.
(2) Mother Jones is a source of unabashed liberal infomation.
Wikipedia “With a paid circulation of 200,000, Mother Jones magazine is the most widely read liberal publication in the United States.
MORE GOOD NEWS FROM WIKIPEDIA
The magazine was named after Mary Harris Jones, called Mother Jones an Irish-American trade union activist, opponent of child labor, and self-described “hellraiser.” She was a part of the KNIGHTS OF LABOR, the INDUSTRIAL WORKERS OF THE WORLD, the SOCIAL DEMOCRAT PARTY, the SOCIALIST PARTY OF AMERICA The stated mission of Mother Jones is to produce revelatory journalism that in its power and reach informs and inspires a more just and democratic world.[8
Take your Mother Jones and shove it.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 12:18pm@PA PATRIOT
Doesn’t change the facts that were reported in Mother Jones, namely, 1) this was already the rule; 2) George Bush didn’t move the EEOC to reconsider its ruling and 3) that the EECO found that this policiy violated title VII and the 14th Amendments equal protection clause.
Argue against the source, I am not arguing their opinion, just the facts stated within. Here is the original EECO finding, the EECO makes no religious carve out. http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/decision-contraception.html
Report Post »SnowKalBebes
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 1:06pmPA Patriot bashing encicom for using a certain reference but uses wikipedia as a reference. The irony is amazing and sometimes Beck’s sheeple just make it too easy…
Report Post »Mr._Proud_Conservative
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 1:37pm@Encinom :
There is a difference between forcing healthcare insurance plans to have contraceptives included due to discrimination against women, and forcing Catholic institutions to provide healthcare, which must include contraceptives due to the ruling in the year 2000, to all their employees.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:02pmMr._Proud_Conservative
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 1:37pm
@Encinom :
There is a difference between forcing healthcare insurance plans to have contraceptives included due to discrimination against women, and forcing Catholic institutions to provide healthcare, which must include contraceptives due to the ruling in the year 2000, to all their employees.
Report Post »_____________________________
There is no difference, Catholic institutions since 200 were subject to the same EEOC ruling in addition to various State laws that require the same coverage. This whole issue is a non-issue being used by Beck and others to fund raise for the GOP.
Babeuf
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:02pmIn December 2000, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission made it clear that an employer’s failure to provide coverage of contraception, when it covers other prescription drugs and preventive care, is a violation of protections against sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act; those protections for employees’ benefits include no exemption for religious employers.
Report Post »CONTINUED
http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/insurance-coverage-for-contraception-state-laws.aspx
Mr._Proud_Conservative
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:19pm@Encinom :
You obviously misinterpreted my post so lets try again in the form of two questions.
First question, do you believe that the government should be able to force employers to have insurance plans that provide contraceptives if they provide other forms of preventive care?
Second question, do you believe that the government should be able to force institutions to provide health care to employees?
I await your response with bated breath.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:34pm@Mr._Proud_Conservative
I rather have single payer health care, but short of that, yes I agree with the EEOC, that hte failure to provide birth control was a violation of Title VII. As for your second question, I don’t care if the insttution is Catholic or not, at a certain size yes an employer must provide either health insurance coverage for their employees or face fines.
Report Post »Lucy Larue
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:38pm@ENCINOM,
Report Post »Why are you ALWAYS on the wrong side of everything?
You abet what is happening to our country.
Encinom…,you do comprendre that this is not about contraception….,but it is about freedom of religion.NON?
The first tenet of Marxism is…,first you attack their religion.
Is this what you want for our country?
Mr._Proud_Conservative
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:51pm@Encinom :
And that my friend is where we diverge. You believe the government has the right to force employers to offer benefits to its employees,I don’t. Now if you can find somewhere in the constitution where that is allowed maybe you can change my mind, until then not only is it morally wrong but legally.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 3:58pm@Mr._Proud_Conservative
Commerce Clause and necessary and proper clause.
Report Post »Mr._Proud_Conservative
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 4:17pmThe Commerce Clause “Article I, Section 8, Clause 3:[2]
[The Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes;”
As you can see the commerce clause with the necessary and proper clause indicates that the congress may regulate commerce, but that does not give it the authority to force a private entity(Me or anyone else) to engage in a contract with another private entity(the insurance providers or any other provider of goods). If what you say is true the government would have the right to force me to buy anything from pet rocks to hybrid cars.
I mean, if you can find me one instance in which these clauses were used this way then I’ll concede defeat.Do you really believe the founders would have want the federal government to have that much power? Do you believe they should?
Report Post »PA PATRIOT
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 4:44pm@SNOWKALBEBES
Report Post »Ironically, it is you who could not differentiate the difference
between a definition and a “Crock of $$$$”
encinom
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 5:05pm@Mr._Proud_Conservative
I know how you tea party types love to argue original intent, well the first Congress required all men of a certain age to own firearms or purchase them and mandated all seaman to purchase medical insurance and for all ship owners to provide it. http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=001/llsl001.db&recNum=257 and than expanded the mandate. http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=001/llsl001.db&recNum=728
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 7:45pmencinom – Did you even read the links you posted. No where did it require the seaman to buy insurance. I read that all ship captains/owners with ships over a certain size leaving the confines of the United States must provide and supply their ship with medical supplies. Thus the employer must provide medical help while at sea and not withhold the cost from the seaman wages. Also please point out on the where it said they must buy firearms and all the other crap you said.
Nice try!
Report Post »ahberns
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 8:48pmencinom What public school did you go to? This is NOT discrimminating against women.
It is enfringing on the church and religious rights. And THAT does not fall under the Civil Rights Act.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:21pm@Cofemale, I can not help it if you do not understand what you are reading.
Congress required the Ships masters to purchase “all such advice, medicine, or attendance of physicians, as any of the crew shall stand in need of in case of sickness.“ and further a fee charged to the seamen ”to provide for the temporary relief and maintenance of sick or disabled seamen, in the hospitals or other proper institutions now established” sounds alot like the 18th century verision of a health insurance mandate.
As for the mandate to buy weapons, men of military age were given six months to “provide himself with a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack, a pouch with a box therein to contain not less than twenty-four cartridges,” http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=001/llsl001.db&recNum=394.
@ahberns
Report Post »Learn to read, the EEOC itself issue the determination that the failure to provide coverage for birth control was a violation of Title VII. This is not a religous issue, despite what Beck and Fox News says, this is an issue of employment law.
hoosier
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:38amSenator Richard Lugar (RIndiana) will only respond with a written response. The person on the other end of the line was not a helpful happy camper.
Senator DAN COATS (RIndiana) was more than happy to comply, he is a co-author. We are proud of Senator DAN COATS (R-Indiana)!!!!!!!
Report Post »Sharon Rose
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:37amLugar is a RINO~ he must go~~
Report Post »c.rozycki
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:38amI’m an Evangelical Christian… not a Catholic. While I share the belief of Religious Freedom… my beliefs are far from the Catholic church… my beliefs are based on the Bible. Please Glenn, don’t try and state that every belief is the same… and that we must ban together… Christ wants us to unite… but He doesn’t want us to unite with a cult or false religion.
Report Post »Obama Snake Oil Co
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:48amAfter reading your post, I do not understand your goal. So I know of catholics and protestants. Its only my opinion, however, I note most protestants tell me to read the bible and most catholics tell me to live it. To say one is a cult…pretty sure Jesus has no problem with that. I think your knowledge of their teachings is reflected by your post. In this matter, its seems they are standing up for your rights while you choose to fluff it off. I guess I “am now Catholic too”.
Report Post »KAdams
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:23amToday’s institutions are the Laodecian church. None of them, Catholic included, can preach the Bible(At least, the non-copywritten one). The catholics don’t teach from the Bible if they can help it, since they have the Catechism. They are all 501c3 designates, and the Bible states “Be ye not unequally yoked with unbelievers”. With such designation, churches cannot preach things that may be construed as ‘hate speech’ i.e sodomy in the Bible, the Jews killing Christ, etc. Today’s churches only tell you what you want to hear.
Report Post »Romans
16:17-19 “Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them. For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple. For your obedience is come abroad unto all men. I am glad therefore on your behalf: but yet I would have you wise unto that which is good, and simple concerning evil.”
Itsjusttim
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:45amKAdams,
Report Post »Listen, Revelation is written as it is because in the end when they pull the churches down, guess what? They bring Jesus Christ right down to our level, and then they’ll have Hell to pay. And I think if you look around you will see the beginnings of strange things happening.
jens63
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:54amYou are missing the point, read Neimuller, whom Glenn keeps quoting trying to enlighten us…
Report Post »“First they came for the Communists but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists but I was not one of them, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews but I was not Jewish so I did not speak out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.”
Martin Niemoeller
KAdams
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:26am@Tim:
Report Post »Maybe I’m being unusually dense; I’ve read your statement over and over, but it doesn’t make sense. Can you elaborate?
VRW Conspirator
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 12:25pm@Obama… right there with you…and I actually am Catholic..
@C.Rozycki…you saying my faith and that of my whole family going back over a 1000′s years is a cult or fake and not based in the Bible…proves you know NOTHING about the Catholic Church. Every Sunday the Church has at least 3 different passages read from the Bible!! and then a preaching (homily) by the priest about the meaning of those passages.
Now while I have not attended a Catholic church regularly for the last 8 years, my family has been going to a non-denominational church because my wife was once like you, taught by her family and friends to be a religious bigot. The reason we picked the church we did was because 40% of the church were Catholics and the pastor, raised a Presbyterian -strict!!, was actually a man of God that grew to appreciate certain aspects of the Catholic Church.
And one more thing…if you go back to one of the modern “father” of the Protestant movement, John Wesley, and read his writings, he ALSO praised the Catholic Church and rebuked ALL those that tried to speak as you do, saying that he had NO problem with the Catholic Church even if he did disagree with them on some practices or rites they performed. Again…he had NO problem with their method of teaching as long as they believe in One God, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost and the risen Christ, which ALL real Catholics do, Nancy Pelosi isn’t a real Catholic.
Report Post »watashbuddyfriend
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:20pmAmend, C.rozycki.
Report Post »Copo
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 3:27pmIt’s okay, he’s a Mormon, he doesn’t understand the whole Word of God vs. Traditions of man feud. I myself am a recent convert to Evangelism from Catholicism so I have seen their teachings first hand and they really do ignore the Bible. They teach to do good works for salvation, rather than doing good works to shine a light in the world.
Report Post »edmundburk
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 7:07pmWhat do you think people were before the reformation?
Report Post »Truth Wins Every Time
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:36amThe main push, Beck says, is to support the highway transportation bill, which will likely be voted upon this week. It will include an amendment from Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) that would protect religious conscience rights.
————————————————————————————————–
First tell me what this bill is about. Won’t be good to vote yes to part of a bill that may be bad.
Report Post »KAdams
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:24amThe Trans-Texas Corridor?
Report Post »Zcat
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:35amI called my representative. I gave them all the infomation above on the amendment. I do feel like my congressman will vote for this, his office will send me an email or mail out Woodall response. We must stand together! Thanks Beck for the heads up and the information!
Report Post »paulusmaximus
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:32amSenate phones are already shut down try email
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:30amHave already contacted them here – e-mail them if you cannot get through on the switchboard. This needs to be spread as far and as fast as possible.
Report Post »KAdams
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:30amOn another note, who dressed Glenn in that picture, his blind mother?
Report Post »TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 12:25pmI do not know what your religion is or if you are educated or not as I skim the comments but I do know that you are MEAN. This is the MEANEST comment ever posted on the Blaze. You choose his mother as your target. Don’t you know about his mother? MEAN MEAN MEAN
Report Post »His_Way
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 2:35amKADAMS you’re contributions are overwhelming, ah not quiet.
“Everything be great, and everything be good
Report Post »If everybody gave, like everybody could”
coot
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:30amAll efforts to reverse this mandate a la dictator are commendable, but the real job is education coming from our priests and bishops in the pulpit. Many of my fellow Catholics have no idea why the Catholic Church condemns the use of artificial contraception. Why did so MOST people quit smoking? Education.
Report Post »RESEARCH THE LINK BETWEEN BREAST CANCER AND THE PILL!
Chet Hempstead
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 4:53pmEverybody knows that the Catholic Church condemns contraception. They just don’t care because it’s a stupid rule. Nobody sane is so religious that they would unnecessarily give up sex to avoid having more children than they can care for.
Report Post »KAdams
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:28amAnd, just who does ‘Beck’ think he is?
1 Timothy 4:1-2 “Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;”
First of all, Beck needs to get out of the faith propaganda business. Beck’s a Mormon, he uses Vick’s vapo-rub so he can actually cry on TV… You cannot serve both God and mammon, and Beck’s master is mammon. If he didn’t, he‘d offer his ’products’ for free. To be distributed amongst the saints.
Do you really think he cares about you all? The deception is great indeed. Don‘t buy into this wolf in sheep’s clothing. You don’t have to fall for this crap to be against the mandate. It has nothing to do with faith, and everything to do with the government mandating you to buy a product. Period. Like flood insurance. Another racket…
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:38amNow you should know, what if over time the general consensus has departed from the truth, and all Christians are practicing lies reinforced by rote? Then, the scripture of Timothy teaches people to be paranoid of any teachings which deviate from the norm. Therefore the scripture of Timothy which really isn’t, only serves as a stumbling block for the masses.
Report Post »legendarytwo
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:41amKADAMS- You’re such a peach. I’m sure sure your doing a lot more to save this country than Glenn. I don’t know how you even have time to let us idiots know how brilliant you are.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:50amIf you were a bad guy, and you knew of a coming prophecy which would affect you, wouldn’t you try to throw it off?
Report Post »Airgun
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:14amYou are a religious bigot, got it.
Report Post »KAdams
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:29amThe point isn‘t to turn the ’prophecy’, as you put it. The point is to warn. Besides, Tim, the Bible clearly states that broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there be that go thereat. I‘m aware that most won’t see the truth. It’s saddening, but I’m not God, to make people see.
@Airgun: Your own comment reflects back upon your own bigotry.
Report Post »KAdams
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:35am@Legendary: Was that meant as sarcasm? Are you belittling my intelligence on the basis that I have faith in God? I find it amusing that intelligent people can’t have faith. According to other ‘intelligent’ people, that is. Pardon, while I take a moment and reflect on such entertaining thoughts.
Report Post »KAdams
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:40am@Tim:
“If you were a bad guy, and you knew of a coming prophecy which would affect you, wouldn’t you try to throw it off?”
Satan already knows he’s doomed… he can‘t change what’s going to happen.
Report Post »sawbuck
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:46amKadams
GBTV (Full package value deal)……………………$9.99 month
GBTV (budget deal)…………………………………$4.99 month
Glenn Radio program…………………………………..…..free….!
Glenn beck (THE BLAZE)…………………………….…….free….!
His message “Uniting and Informing”……………………..free…..!
Allows anyone to comment….. …………………………..free…!
YOU.. “Claiming to be a Christian” by quoting Bible Scripture .
THEN…You start throwing stones ……………………………….!
Without pulling the log out of your own eye FIRST………………!
Priceless…….? Not Really……………………………………………!
I know ….There are citizens of this Once Great Nation…
Report Post »That hate seeing our country being destroyed ….!
And “they” are “Patriots”… but not Christian…..!
DO YOU..!
KAdams
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:31am@Sawbuck:
No, I don’t get the meaning of your post.
Oh, I get it… I think. Maybe? You‘re saying Glenn doesn’t work for mammon? You‘re saying Glenn isn’t deceiving the masses? What exactly are you trying to say?
Report Post »bullcrapbuster
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 12:06pm@Kadams…….You should take your meds…wait a while and then try to post something coherent. There may be a wolf in sheeps clothing in our midst but it ain’t Glenn.
Report Post »Lucy Larue
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 3:44pmKADAMS,
Report Post »Tres hilarious you are. …,tres hilarious!
Is KADAMS a psuedonym for David Brock?!
You post propaganda.
COFemale
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 7:49pmKAADAMS – SATAN is that you?
Report Post »edmundburk
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 7:36pmI don’t know why your bagging on beck, I believe Beck is honest and sincere. A lot of what he has predicted has come true. And if he was in for the money, he would’ve laid off george soros and obama
Report Post »when he was on FOR network. I ead your other posts you don’t like Beck,catholics, and Mormons is their anthing you evengelicals DO support?
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:25amI’m with you Beck… AND while we’re at… while we have their ear… let’s try to convince them to NOT vote for Obama this year!! And let’s get the Jews on board with that too! And the Ron Paul supporters! And….
Report Post »Critical Thinker
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 1:02pmIf you are serious about getting Ron Paul supporters on your side, you might want to re-think that screen name.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:24amUpon this Rock Jesus build his church, and the gates of hell will not prevail against it. And neither can people let them. As the Rock goes down, so do the branches.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:33amWho is the son of man people should be raising up? It isn’t Jesus because he has already risen.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:40amAnd it isn’t John because he is a stone that goes where he wants.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:47amThe Rock has to be raised, and all the branches will raise also.
Report Post »Lumbar Spine
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:22amHow can anyone who has religious beliefs contrary to Catholic teachings declare himself, even figuratively, a Catholic? Aren’t you, in effect, tacitly giving credence to all Catholic teachings…even those that may differ significantly from your religion?
Report Post »oldguy49
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:35amlumbar……did you ever hear……….. they came for the jews and i said nothing because i was not a jew
Report Post »2GodBeTheGlory
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 9:41amAlthough I am not Catholic and do not believe in all the things they do, I have endorsed and even participated in joint events with the Catholic church. I believe that some are my brothers and sisters in Christ and so my actions that I’m responsible to God for are to help the Bride of Christ.
Report Post »TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:54am@Lumbar No!
Report Post »dirtypolitics
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 1:21pmEver heard of figurative language?
Report Post »Lumbar Spine
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 2:09pmWhat if the government was imposing an offensive regulation against Muslim institutions, would Glenn and his devoted followers declare they were all Muslims? Ummmmm…I doubt that very seriously.
Report Post »2GodBeTheGlory
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 3:08pm@ LUMBAR SPINE
Muslim’s do not have the same core faith. Please move along – nothing for you to see here.
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 7:50pmGo hook up with Rational Man, he is more your speed.
Report Post »