Beck Responds to WaPo Story About Romney’s Alleged High School Bullying
- Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:03pm by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
Earlier today, The Blaze reported about John Lauber and his family’s startling response to allegations that GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney bullied him back in high school.
This morning, Glenn Beck and his radio team spoke out about the media’s handling of the situation, specifically when it comes to outlets’ consistent failures to properly vet President Barack Obama.
GlennBeck.com recaps Beck’s discussion about The Washington Post report that brought the allegations out to the forefront:
“You know, here’s the Washington Post vetting Mitt Romney in this way for a haircut, a haircut, 50 years ago. Almost 50 years ago, but they have absolutely zero interest, none whatsoever, in the chosen one’s past. Barack Obama has done and said ‑‑ I mean, the guy was mentored by a card‑carrying Communist,” Pat said.
Glenn added that in the sixties and seventies the words and insults that are now associated with “gay bashing” weren’t necessarily used that way then. Glenn said that he used to be called a “pansy” because he was terrible at sports, but neither he nor his friends associated the word with having sex with men or other homosexual behavior.
“It’s not what they meant. We didn’t think this way,” Glenn explained.
“The culture was completely different then,” Stu added.
“Is everybody in the Washington Post so secure in their high school career that there’s nothing they fear coming out?,” Beck asked.
Watch the segment, below:
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 692 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 662 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 524 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 364 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 336 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 223 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 234 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order Read More- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 223 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (130)
fastfacts1
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 6:05pmThere are a few things to the story that were missed:
1 – Romney has saved the lives of about a dozen people since then.
2 – The main stream media has started bombarding their networks with this crap story: http://www.thedailycandidate.com/video/2012/may/msm_romney_pranking.html
3 – The ‘victims’ family denounced this story.
4 – Obama was and is a bully
And so much more to come…
Report Post »From Virginia
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 6:52pmIt never happened.
A) The family don’t recall it.
B) The story changed and the WaPo lied about changing it.
C) The Daily Mail (UK) who ran with the story (they hate Romney) last night and had over 700 comments this morning COMPLETELY scrubbed the story by 10:00am (EST).
That’s all I need to know.
Report Post »VinnieSquawker
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 8:20amOne other thing that was missed…who gives a crapola?
Report Post »Soul Leister
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 9:38amMedia fixates on Romney highschool bullying story; IGNORES OBAMA FELONY POSSESSION/USE OF DRUGS FROM HIS BOOK.
Romney was a minor in highschool when the bullying supposedly happened.
OBAMA WAS AN ADULT WHEN HIS FELONY DRUG USE AND POSSESSION OCCURRED.
Makes talking heads in the media look like desperate political hacks doing whatever the DNC tells them too (or ignore whatever the DNC tells them too). CNN and MSBS are the worse offenders immedately followed by all the rest of the alphabet and paper harlots of babylon.
Report Post »Soul Leister
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 9:40amhey, vinnie… that’s what your momma said, but I couldn‘t understand ’er because she had a mouth full of my ….
Report Post »joyscar
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 5:57pmA quote from the original news story: “The incident was recalled similarly by five students, who gave their accounts independently of one another. Four of them — Friedemann, now a dentist; Phillip Maxwell, a lawyer; Thomas Buford, a retired prosecutor; and David Seed, a retired principal — spoke on the record. Another former student who witnessed the incident asked not to be identified.” These men who paticipated in this vicious act are incredulous that old Mitty couldn’t recall this. They ALL remember it and are remorseful for their actions. Mitt, conveniently, doesn’t “remember,” which I don’t believe! He’s a LIAR. Had he taken responsibility or showed any genuine kind of regret for having participated in this incident, it would have made the news story just look like a opportunistic chance to make Mitt look bad. The fact that he REFUSED to do this shows a severe lack of conscience and character. Romney is a disgenuine, phony, arrogant, pretentious jackass! He can’t express a cogent thought or platform fro the republican party. If he is the person who represent all of your views and values….then our country is doomed for failure.
Report Post »ktmrider1
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:55pmoh my god mitt romney was a bully back in 1965 when he was in middle school! well it‘s all over for his nomination isn’t it. left wing loons are so predictable and pathetic.
Report Post »texasbeta
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 11:52pmAwww….your Etch-A-Sketch candidate is also an arsehole. Like we didn’t know that already. How else is he going to get the vote of the rest of you arseholes. That’s the difference between the parties, not policy…it is morons and arseholes vs everyone else. BTW- You are the arseholes and idiots.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 1:38amI know the School well… and of the period he was there. It was the old-school School… of Uniforms and Conformity… with emphasis upon the Classics & Arts. For the Wealthy Class… it produced Fine Young People!
If you want to Cry about Bullies… go to the Armed Services!
Report Post »ktmrider1
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 9:57amI rest my case, pathetic
Report Post »ktmrider1
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 10:15amhey dic# wad take your head up your arse self and keep it on the huff and puff post
Report Post »Silversmith
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:54pmC’mon America, time to get in the game. The disparity of coverage here deserves an answer from MSM. Eventually, they won’t be able to lie effectively because we will stop listening.
Silversmith
Report Post »From Virginia
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 7:11pmWho is going to MAKE them answer for it? They have no viewers yet they keep plugging along. Someone is subsidizing them and it’s probably US without our consent.
Report Post »zoro51
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:54pmcrap happends I was bullied as well in grade school jr high n high school IT ended in college cause i STOOD UP n ended it there are SO MANY GAAY MORMONS its a laughting matter how they PRETEND we dont exist when in fact MEN AND WOMEN are FONDLED before marrige By SAME SEX temple persons.. Os dont give me this BS of GYAS n mormons dont do it I KNOW THEY DO IT.. bulliing most likelk HES done it.. one thing must be.. THE END OF IT NOW.. if hes said hes sorry he MAY not fully recall it BUT IT TOOK PLACE.. HE SAID HE WAS SORRY NOW MOVE ON
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 6:07pmhave you been drinking again – or just typing faster than you can think?
Report Post »snyggys
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 7:17pmYou have absolutely no Clue what you are saying. You are so ignorant and mock a religions sacred practices when you truly do have NO CLUE what you talk about. You are a disgusting and blatant liar and just because you say something does not make it so. But, I know the truth has no place in your world.
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 8:02pmEvery tub will stand on its own bottom. It is not about what everyone beside you does or does not do. It is about what you do to insure you are right in the eyes of God. No men are perfect, but some who want an upheavel in a society who has bent backwards to appease is not going to make the cut. There are limits to everything even to freedoms that are excessive. There has to be structure and guidelines and a basis or foundation upon which to make laws in order to sustain as much fairness as possible. These Truths in law must be above what man will have in order for them to be just. Men are just not capable of making just laws. The Spirit of God is in law when people ask his blessings over a country. That is why this country has prospered as much as it has. People are ruining it because they want to follow after hedonism more than follow after God. People are, by their own doing, dirtying up and twisting these laws to suit their agendas. This should not be, for it will not stand.
Report Post »Amica
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 2:05amWow…I would respond with a carefully and strongly worded post but I have no idea what you’re trying to say.
Report Post »goodpart1
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:43pmAmazing..Glenn Beck in his hunt on George Soros( which sounded alot like the universal Jew fear baiting) used a story out of context about Soros helping confiscate Jewsih property when he was just a child and hiding to save his life….but a story about Romney backed up by the people that were there is considered suspicious and shoulf be dismissed without merit….I personally feel that a story this old about school acts really are not that relevant..there are hundreds of examples why Romney is not worthy to be president that are more recent and timely
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:59pmYeah, we believe you. We don’t think you have any agenda and are only after the truth. We think you are an impartial judge, and here to get the truth out. Right.
Report Post »BehindBlueEyes
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 6:07pm@Goodpart1
“hundreds of examples why Romney is not worthy to be president”
Can you give us your top 5 reasons why Romney is not fit to be President?
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 6:47pmOh let me…
1. Supports NDAA
2. Supports Patriot Act
3. Gun Control
4. Vietnam Deferments
5. Keynesian Economics
Those are my top five.
Report Post »abbygirl1994
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 12:59amYou say all that and then say Romney has hundreds of examples.. but don’t even expound on them, which tells me you are a liberal left winger.. who opens mouth to accept foot! Romney is 100 x’s better than what we have in the White House right now! I am waiting for the hundreds of reasons you will put below my post.
Report Post »SwordAndShield_ofTruth
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 12:32pmGotta love it when they release the dogs of media matters into the comment section of the blaze. Makes for priceless entertainment when the average layman can chew them up and spit them out.
Nom nom nom!
Report Post »freedomisasfreedomdoes
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:40pmGood job uber lefties at bringing up a non-issue. So ridiculous. So stupid and insulting. Get a clue please stop insulting America.
Report Post »freedomisasfreedomdoes
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:40pmRidiculous. The man is way past high school. Hopefully, WE HAVE ALL grown-up past high school and put it behind us.
Report Post »Bill Rowland
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 7:42amIt’s amazing that this is getting so much publicity. This happened years ago but Sweet Old Barack and his minions are investigating (bullying) a Romney donor. Thats just the one we know about. Sweet Old Barack has Epic Holdup and his Department of (in) Justice investigating sheriffs, mayors and politicians who oppose them.
Sweet Old Barack has admitted to bullying a girl while he was in school and they ignore it.
Doesn’t it bother anyone that the Washington Post had this article ready to go as soon as Sweet Old Barack announced he was in favor of gay marraige? Anyone else thing there is colusion there?
WATCH THE OTHER HAND PEOPLE!!! What are Sweet Old Barack and his boys really up to while we are all worried about this BS??
OMG 2012
Report Post »Watermain
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:23pmPlease tell me that this does not surprise any of you. Obama’s people will do and say anything to get him re-elected. What the heck, they can always apologize later.
Report Post »doomytram
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:35pmNo surprise, it‘s just so pathetic on the part of the Obamunist’s and the disastrous Oblamer.
Report Post »From Virginia
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 6:57pmI blame the first people who opened up congressman Ryan’s SEALED divorce records to force him out of the race in Illinois.
THAT’S where it all started.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:14pmLOL, Beck didn‘t waste any time jumping on the Romney bandwagon even though he’s a super progressive. I didn’t believe the folks that said he was supporting, Bachman or Santorum as a ruse and he was really behind Romney all the way. I suppose I owe those folks an apology.
Report Post »QuranIsCorruptAndMuhammadPossessedBySatan
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:17pmWho is MORE progressive? Obama or Romney?
nuff said.
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:36pmWhich direction to both Romney and Obama take us?
I know, the bumper sticker needs to say “Romney, well at least he isn’t a communist.”
You think that kind of excitement will beat Obama? You are sadly mistaken. Fortunately there is still a better option.
http://www.fox19.com/story/18305604/reality-check-why-all-rnc-delegates-are-free-agents-and-unbound#.T6yV6OCBWuQ.facebook
Funny, you know the Blaze’s motto “the truth lives here” doesnt apply when it comes to a pro Ron Paul issue.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:55pmWho is MORE? progressive??? A progressive is a progressive, just one is a Dem progressive, the other is a Repub progressive. Neither have true conservative principles, just rhetoric. When are people going to wake up?
Does not matter, Paul is going to win the nomination. Rule 38 of the GOP handbook, that has been used in the last two elections, states that no delegates can be bound by any state, therefore, on the first round of votes, delegates can vote their conscience. There are more Paul supporters as delegates than anyone knows about. I would say that one third of supposed Romney delegates are Paul supporters and Paul is in a close second with delegates to this point. Add the Paul supporters that nobody knows about and we have a very interesting convention coming up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anWsU93fFsk&feature=youtu.be
Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 6:07pmMutiny, we posted close together, maybe people will actually click on the links and learn something about the primary elections. It amazes me how little most people know about how our election process works. This is why Paul is doing so well, his supporters not only have the loyalty and fortitude to work the process, but the knowledge also. I have watched some caucuses and am amazed at how Paul supporters use the rules against everyone in order to take over the caucuses, by the rules. It is amazing.
Go Ron Paul!
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 6:38pm@westcoast and mutiny –
Can you please explain to me why the Paul supporters are in favor of delegates voting for someone different than whom the voters sent them to vote for? (reading that back it sounds confusing, but I’m sure you get my point :)
What would you guys be saying if Ron Paul had won a primary and that State’s delegates all voted for Romney instead?
I posed this question below, but maybe you didn’t see it. I’m very curious to know the answer…
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 6:47pmP8riot
Report Post »Virgin Islands……look it up. A little homework goes along way.
justangry
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 7:10pm@Patriot, I see what you‘re saying and IF the media was fair to RP and if trucks with votes from Aimes didn’t get lost, and if Maine didn’t cancel caucuses in Februrary because of predicted 1-3 inches of snow, and if they didn’t close people out of special caucuses in NV, and if there wasn’t so many videos of establishment GOP folks trying to shut out Paul supporters, and if the GOP didn’t threaten to not seat delegates from NV, etc… I’d join in with you on petitioning the GOP to change it OWN rules. I just think RP has been given the shaft in more ways than one. How about O’Reilly telling his flock before the primaries that Paul would NEVER be the nominee? Finally, no one is stopping Romney‘s supporters from doing what Paul’s supporters are doing in these caucus states, are they? Just no one is really all that enthusiastic for him like they are for Dr. Paul. They might vote for him because he’s who they think will beat Obama, but they aren’t getting off the couch for him. So really it comes down to RP’s people being activists vs. Romney’s supporters being old and groomed by CFR/foreign owned Fox News. (their blackout is back firing) Don’t worry though, I‘m sure the establishment will pull some crap of it’s own to ensure their good little globalist is the nominee. The central bankers, military industrial complex and other elites are comfy, so they won’t jeopardize RP cutting their gravy train.
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 7:19pm@P8riot
Well, the RNC is a independent organization with their own rules. I think the better question is why is Mitt Romney unable to secure these delegates. He is so unorganized he doesnt know the process? Its it he has so little excitement with his campaign no one is bothering to do the leg work.
You realize that if Romney doesnt win on the first vote at the convention, Ron Paul will be the nominee. So if that happens, will you vote for Ron Paul?
Report Post »Pappypatriot
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 7:24pmGive me a break! Glenn actually never came out and endorsed anyone…In regards to this story He was pointing out the hypocricy of Obama and the LSM. He has said all along that with the choice between Obama and Romney Mitt would get 100% of his support as would anyone who cares about saving our country from a dictatorship.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 7:55pmOh Pappy… A dictatorship? You mean like where the people have no Constitutional rights? Where they can be sent away with no trial. Where they can be spied on without a warrant? Groped by government lackies? Stripped of their property? Not being able to assemble peacefully in protest? I suggest you take a harder look at your boy and the crappy laws he SAID he supports.
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 8:12pmSo in summary, you guys are saying that you don’t feel you had a fair shake during the campaign and primaries and will thus attempt to use rule technicalities to win rather than allow the voters decide. Right?
Sorry, but just because the delegates would no longer be bound in a second round does not make it ethical for them to say “screw you” to the voters from their state.
As for the Virgin Islands, yes, Ron Paul got 11 more votes than Romney, you can have all 6 delegates if you want and it still wouldn’t make a difference.
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 8:40pm@p8riot
Well what is funny is you didnt watch the clip. This bit of information came out because in 2008 a Romney supporter in Utah refused to vote for McCain. You bring up the 2nd ballot. No this applies to the first ballot.
You didnt answer my questions earlier. So why is Romney not getting these delegates? If Ron Paul wins will you support him or will you to quote Romney supporters “be voting for Obama”?
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 9:06pm@mutiny –
As for why and how many delegates are bound for Romney, I’ll do some research on that. I’m not to proud to say when I need to look into it more :) If you already know, then feel free to share – we’re on the same side here.
I’ll tell you this, whomever’s name is on the ballot opposite to Obama come November – I will vote for. If Ron Paul pulled off a miracle, I would vote for him over Obama because I believe he would be less destructive. Can you say the same regarding Romney? Yeah, yeah, I know you‘ll say he’s “Obama-lite” (even though that’s not remotely true) but you can‘t deny that he’s better than Obama.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 9:08pm@Patriot, Yes, I think the system should be changed. Not in the middle of the primary though. I don’t like electronic ballots. I think the media should be more honest. I’m not a huge fan of the super pacs. That being said, they are playing by the same rules. Ron Paul has NO advantage whatsoever, other than a platform that actually excites people. Everyone said during the primaries the caucuses were basically glorified straw polls. Furthermore, if we went solely by delegate count, people in states whose primaries are late can get completely shut out of the process. I agree the system stinks, but the people from the Paul camp are playing by the rules which is not the case with other campaigns and there’s plenty of video evidence of that. Besides, everyone says it isn’t going to work, and as we’ve discussed before, I don’t think our votes should be counted by a Soros connected company in Socialist Spain either.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 9:34pmHow is it Herr Doctor only seems to excite 10 – 15% of the voters in practically every primary – even when he is basically now going head to head with Romney?
One of the biggest problems Herr Doctor has are his supporters who are more like the OWSer anarchist branch….grow up
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 9:59pm@kay
Only 10 to 15 percent actually understand what is happening.
Only 10 to 15% understand if you nominate a guy saying “fiscal responsibility” yet he puts out a budget that doesnt cut current spending levels you are going to get hammered by Obama.
Maybe only 10 to 15% want freedom and rest have no problems with the government spying and tracking them. It could be that only 10 to 15% think our military is spread to thin and we need to quit being the global police force.
What I personally think it is though, is ignorance. People listen to Rush, Sean, Beck, and Bill and let them tell them who to vote for. They listen to FOX and do no research on their own because they really believe those men can do no wrong. Dont get me wrong I loved Glenn’s show on Fox. It woke me up to these things. After he left the show though he changed. I will be honest, I dont see how Bill is still on the air. I listen to Rush and Sean some but ever since Glenn’s Fox show I seen their biased.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 10:20pm@Kaydee, Ron Paul attracts a wide variety of people. Go to a Ron Paul rally before you start comparing us to the Occupy crowd. Here’s a good video of some of his supporters. When you see them turn their back to the Whitehouse and salute… they did that 1 second for every ACTIVE duty member who commited suicide since Obama took office. It lasted over 10 1/2 minutes. I care a great deal for those men. Do you?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XqNmEKoLUE
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwp&v=_i_moQMsM9I&NR=1
West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 2:09amP8triot, Watch the clips from JustAngry. I am a veteran for Ron Paul, I am 54 years old. I say this, if any person who has served in the military, took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, and votes for any progressive, who looks at the Constitution as a problem for their agenda, in my eyes has commited treason to the United States. Only you can decide which side of history, and that is what is being made right now, you are going to be on. Will you be on the side that blindly follows the special interests of the elite, or will you fight for freedom? We all know which has the bigger ideals that will be recorded in the history books. Wake up America, and see which side of hidstory you want to be on.
Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 2:39amP8triot, Here is an old clip, but still has the same meaning today as it did then: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OV8RSgCr2g
Our founders were wise men. They put a system in place that had the ability to sidestep tyranny if need be. The voting process is set up to allow the grassroots of freedom to prevail when the establishment will not listen to reason. In order to be free, you need the handfuls of people that have the fortitude to stand up to the special interests, the corrupt that would take everything and give back nothing in return, and ignore the ridicule from the masses that have fallen into the special interests rheroric.This handful of patriots will be the ones that save a nation as the rest sit idly by fearing the unknown.
The Revolutionary War was started from less than 20% of the people and became the biggest force for freedom the world has ever seen. We are repeating history, in some sense, that we are in a fight for our freedoms again, and it is going to take less than 20% of the people to do the right thing. Sad, since most really should know their history and be willing to join the fight. I will be on the right side of history. I will write Pauls name in if I have to.
Ron Paul 2012!!
Report Post »cykonas
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 6:50am@Kaydeebeau
Report Post »Your assertion that RP usually gets between 5% and 15% in most of the primaries is true. Remember, though, in many states if a voter is registered as anything except a Republican they can’t vote in the primary. In fairness I admit that I’ve followed and supported RP for a long time. I don’t know if the voting restrictions make enough of a difference to change the primary outcomes, but I do know they certainly are a factor in the lower percentage that RP generally garners. It‘s one of the reasons he generally does much better in straw polls where it’s less likely that a voter’s Party of registration is taken into account. Peace.
ConnConservative
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 10:33amJust angry- still don’t get it , do you? We are at the tipping point & if Obama gets elected its over, no return for generations, and you will be dead If and when the Republic EVER RETURNS!
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 11:31amNo you don’t get it. Yes we’re at a tipping point. The global elites are playing their end game because the gig is up. Romney is on the global elite team, with the media the banks, The Fed, Republicans, and Democrats, Obama, think tanks, Military Industrial Complex, etc. They’re trying to convince the sheep (sucessfully) that there is a difference between them, but there really isn’t on anything substancial. Romney is it because he fits into their plan. Obama / Romney… no difference, they will both surrender our sovereignty over to the UN.
Report Post »QuranIsCorruptAndMuhammadPossessedBySatan
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:14pmThe “story” of the supposed bullying by Romney is falling apart and the family of the guy says he never mentioned it, and if it had been that bad he would’ve told them. The guy would’ve know who Romney was before he died I think this story is made up….now…what about Obama’s OWN BOOK where he said he bullied the only black kid in his class.
Did he hate being black as a child? So he targeted the only black child in his class. Did he ever apologize to her…SINCE HE ADMITS IT.
Back in the day Obama must’ve hated being black because he targeted and bullied the only other black child in his class and he did that in front of white students who laughed…did Obama ever apologize? It was not that long ago.
Is she even real?
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:36pmActually according to other sources she may be real but her name was Joenetta or Joenella or something like that. She has said this never happened, that O was her knight in shining armor at school. The story in Os book is very similar to another story in one of Bill Ayers books.
Report Post »BIGWUN
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:00pmIt is a blessing that God always trips up would-be dictators by letting them convict and sentence themselves. The Mitt release was obviously timed to add credence to the “evolving” BO position on gay marriage.
Report Post »Here’s how God took care of things this time: Leftists always forget that Leftists always lie. For years, the gay community, as part of justifying forcing itself on America, has always stated that 10% of the US population is gay. So, BO couldn’t pass up a great voting bloc like that along with the concurrent Hollywood fund-raising benefits, could he?
Well, BO, you forgot that one key lie, which has been spread for so long. The gay portion of the US population is actually less than 1%. In great majority, the rest of the country is not gay and could care less if many of your buddies are, BO. All we have ever said is: Keep it to yourselves and don’t force it on our children by stridently attempting to legitimize it as a great way to live.
Punch the No Sale button, Mr Spokesperson/President of Evil, Inc. Have a nice retirement.
jimmyv777
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:57pmThis is how incredibly stupid liberals are and any reader of the Washington Post. This story is being covered by Fox too, It‘s so bizzare it’s almost like a cartoon but this is the kind of dumb a$$es you are dealing with when you engage with Dumb F liberals in any discussion! Liberalism is truly a mental disorder as Dr Savage says! I mean really, you go back 50 years and the only story you can find on Romney is this, yet Obama gets a free pass on everything! Its laughable the stupidity of liberals!
Report Post »RedDirtTexas
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:54pmThe alleged victim is conveniently dead and his sister and family say it never happened. Smoke, mirrors, bells, whistles, strobe lights, and LIES,LIES, and more LIES! These are the campaign tactics of the left. Divert attention from the fact that Obama is incompetent on the economy, energy, foreign policy, and leadership in general.
Report Post »Its Gonna Getcha
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:46pmIn Obama’s book he wrote (and says in the audio version) that he shoved a female, and all we hear from the mainstream news outlets are crickets.
Report Post »QuranIsCorruptAndMuhammadPossessedBySatan
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:16pm…and that other kid Obama “shoved” was the only other black child in his class.
Which shows that he was HATED being half black in his school days because that was the only other kid he BULLIED in class…and he did that in front of the white students to humiliate her.
..AND OBAMA ADMITS IT
Report Post »chubby
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:38pmI just hope I live long enough to be able to read the “real” Obama story. That is, of course, if there is anyone with balls enough to write it.
Report Post »MAX0O1
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 8:21pmAllllright!
Report Post »Leavon
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:32pmGlenn, I mean this in all sincerity. Get rid of your colorful side kicks, they are a distraction and really are very annoying. You can get your message out so much better without those two bufoons messing things up.
Report Post »dennisS
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:40pmPat and Stu are great! These two guys really make the show fun and interesting, their humor is fantastic and they make the show much better.
Report Post »SquidVetOhio
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:51pmPat and Stu is what makes Glenn listenable! Otherwise it’s like listening to Jimmy Swaggert.
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:32pmIf their readers weren’t so damn stupid and gullible a story like this would have no point in existing. But LEFTIST MEDIA knows how stupid their customers really are and this is just another way of helping The One hold onto his job. It’s pathetic, their readers are pathetic and the editors of WAPO are likewise, PATHETIC!
Report Post »IDONTTHINKSO
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:56pmI agree but, does it not seem strange that the liberal media counts on its followers to be idiots, but surely there has to be some out there that can see that the media is playing them for fools? That’s what makes me pull what little hair I have left, out!
Report Post »HKS
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:21pmObama is a loser, elected by losers. The American people need to wake up and quit letting losers elect the leaders of this country. America has great people but they are a little laze when it comes to selecting politicians. They simply tend to let someone else do it. Well now they are paying the price for that and if they don’t get on the stick their going to be sitting in the same position as the Germans wondering “what happened” Get off your butt and get rid of this riff raff.
Report Post »wbedding
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:20pmdistraction tactics 101 – Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals…
Report Post »EqualJustice
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:17pmI find it amazing that with ALL the time and digging invested by BO & CO, THIS is the best they could come up with? Romney seems a pretty safe bet to me. He should just IGNORE these stupid stories and just tell everyone they are lies or he can’t remember BACK that far. They lie SO much, no one pays attention to most of this crap anyway! Obama is the one who has QUITE the hidden (and not so hidden) disgraceful past! Romney is a SAINT next to BO and his crack cocaine, screwed up family and life and LIES.
Report Post »Mark0331
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:13pmYet Barry the commie coke head gets a free pass…..last time I checked, the economy is in shambles and millions of our friends and neighbors are out of work….Barry goes to this level in his campaign?..pathetic….Just like the Homosexual ‘agenda’, its a non-issue for sane people.
Report Post »mercenary4freedom
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 1:17amYou got that right 0331, these are all non issues, complete distractions from the real issues in which owebama has failed to and unable to fix. All he wants is a second shot at the checkbook so he can finish the fall of the republic.
He has NO successful track record so he resorts to stupid stuff. Stuff that his brain dead sheep will make a big issue out of, like the whores in the lame stream media.
Report Post »moussiagilda
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:12pmFake news.
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:12pmThis alleged bullying story has and will backfire on the left just like the gay marriage announcement… especially as more holes in the story are revealed.
Most recent poll: ROMNEY 50% OBAMA 43%…
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
Report Post »lisa2994
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:33pmIt will because it has been found to not be factual!
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:31pmhttp://www.fox19.com/story/18305604/reality-check-why-all-rnc-delegates-are-free-agents-and-unbound#.T6yV6OCBWuQ.facebook
This is a good story also.
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:43pmLeave it to old Mitt to say sorry for something he doesnt even remember. Freedom does have good news though.
http://www.fox19.com/story/18305604/reality-check-why-all-rnc-delegates-are-free-agents-and-unbound#.T6yV6OCBWuQ.facebook
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:59pm@MUTINY
Can you please explain to me why the Paul supporters are in favor of delegates voting for someone different than whom the voters sent them to vote for? (reading that back it sounds confusing, but I’m sure you get my point :)
What would you guys be saying if Ron Paul had won a primary and that State’s delegates all voted for Romney instead?
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 7:25pmSo if you are at a baseball game and its in the 6th inning and the score is 5-1 the game is over?
Look, Ron Paul supporters are following the rules they arent trying to cheat anyone like the Romney camp is doing. Here I will provide a link to you to show what the Romney camp is doing. I dont even blame Romney for this as these people I am sure were acting independent of Romney’s actual campaign.
http://www.infowars.com/romney-operatives-caught-handing-out-fake-ballots-in-nevada-and-maine-2/
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 7:28pmAnother funny tid bit about that poll of the people polled 40% think Obama is doing a good job on the economy. Ole Rasmussen must be scraping the bottom of the barrel to find these poll takers.
Report Post »dont_tax_me_bro
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:10pmBeck was a mormon religious bully. If you didnt agree with his far right apocalyptic view of the world you were called a satanist…LOL!
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:28pm- actually its quite the opposite –
I, as a “Mormon”, have been accused of wanting to have “orgies in heaven”, of being a “cultist”, a “follower of Satan”, a “blasphemer”, and lots of other fun names solely because of my faith. In fact, all of these insults have been made on this very website. Yeah, Mormons are the “religious bullies.” lol.
Report Post »FREDINOHIO
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:37pmHuh???
Report Post »SHOOTnCRASH
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:46pmI grew up in an area of California that had a lot of Mormons (Saratoga, Ca.) and you couldn’t be more wrong. Still to this day Ive never known a bunch of nicer, decent humans. The Mormon kids I grew up with would be the type that would confront a bully. When I think back those Mormon kids were by far the most respectful and helpful.
Report Post »Iron_Dawg
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:02pmMormons are bullies?!?!? Really?!?!? I don’t know about the Mormons you know, but none of the ones I know are bullies in any manner, shape, or form. I’m a Christian (non-denominational, but raised Catholic) and I have NEVER seen/heard a Mormon say anything that would put them in the category of “bully”… and I know quite a few Mormons (one of whom is the local Mormon Bishop).
So, @DONT_TAX_ME_BRO, could you please give me an example of how Glenn Beck was a “mormon religious bully”?
Report Post »marine249
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:06pm@ IRON
BRO just though it sounded good at the time.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:18pm@Patriot, You’re right, I’ve seen it too.
Report Post »EqualJustice
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:24pmI was on a cruise last year with a group of 200 Mormon singles age 21-30. They were awesome and I never had such a great cruise! REALLY GOOD LOOKING, healthy people with bodies to die for. :) They didn’t do drugs, drink or smoke, but they liked to party, dance and eat soft serve ice cream. haha It was so fun, I wish they could be on every cruise with us.
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 6:04pm@JUSTANGRY – Yup. But isn’t this thread a breath of fresh air?!
Thanks to all of you who have said such kind words!!
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 7:39pmI do a question for Mormons. What do you think your prophet was saying right here.
President and Prophet Gordon B. Hinkley of the LDS church. He stated on June 4, 1998, in a speech in Paris, France:
“The traditional Christ of whom they speak (meaning traditional Christian churches) is not the Christ of whom I speak. For the Christ of whom I speak as been revealed in this the Dispensation of the Fullness of Times. He together with His Father, appeared to the boy Joseph Smith in the year 1820, and when Joseph left the grove that day, he knew more of the matters of God than all the learned ministers of the gospel of the ages.” (Church News, June 20, 1998, p70)
Also P8riot you mentioned here people have said Mormons will have orgies in Heaven. Well is it true or untrue that the Mormon god has many wives in Heaven who gave him his “spirit children”. If so, he is practicing polygamy. It might not be an orgy but polygamy none the less. Since, Mormons believe they will be like their god and ruling over their own universe it would also take many wives to do that also. If these are true, does your wife know you will be taking other wives to populate your own planet?
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 8:42pm@MUTINY –
I must first ask you a question… seriously… was your previous moniker “Martinez____” (I can’t remember the number combination after the name)? I’m being completely serious in that question because Martinez asked me an identical question and also brought my wife into the conversation. Plus I looked after reading your post, and your current Moniker was created right about the same time that Martinez (also a Paul supporter and daily poster) suddenly disappeared. Please be honest, I’m just curious since I had so many conversations with him :)
Now, to answer your questions. Regarding what Gordon B. Hinkley stated – the website you cut and paste that from left out the end of his quote – it states:
“Am I Christian? Of course I am. I believe in Christ. I talk of Christ. I pray through Christ. I’m trying to follow Him and live His gospel in my life.”
This entire quote says nothing new. We, as members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believe that Joseph Smith was literally visited by our Heavenly Father and His Son, Jesus Christ and was thereafter directed on what to do to restore the Church of Jesus Christ back to its fullness. One of those restored doctrines was that we believe that God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost are three separate personages. Is that the traditional view of Christ today in other Christian churches? No, thus as he stated, we have a non-traditional understanding of Christ.
continued:
Report Post »….
….
P8riot
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 8:58pmcontinued:
As for your second question, that one is loaded with falsities. First, nowhere, absolutely nowhere in our scriptures does it state what you state regarding our Heavenly Father having multiple wives. You can look if you please, but you won’t find any. Now don’t go trying to use books that are not scripture to claim that such is our doctrine. Find me such a teaching in our canonized scriptures if you can. That has never been taught from a single pulpit in any of our churches.
As for your view that polygamy is synonymous with orgy… would you be so bold in the face of Abraham, Jacob, Moses, or any of the other biblical prophets who were polygamists? Would you say such things to the Lord himself, when he stated (through the Prophet Nathan) that he himself gave David multiple wives (and would have given him more if David so desired)? 2 Samuel 12:7-9.
Anyhow, this is a perfect example of people believing things that they get off of some anti-mormon website that takes our doctrines and twists them for shock value.
Do we believe families are eternal? Absolutely. I know that my wife will be with me after we die and our children will be my children for eternity. This is a beautiful truth that Satan wants to hide from the world.
Take care brother!
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 10:28pm@p8riot
I have answered that question before. I am the same person. I changed over because I like the idea of mutiny if the GOP tries to show another crappy candidate down our throats like McCain.
So the man says it isnt the same Christ. That goes to the exact thing I have brought up before, you are not worshiping the same Christ. You can say the name Jesus Christ over and over but they are not the same ones and your prophet just pointed that out. As many of you Mormons like to point out the word Christian came well after Jesus Christ. The point I have been trying to make is you can call yourself a Christian till you are blue in the face, it doesnt mean you will go to Heaven. You are sadly worshiping a false god created by Satan. As I have said many times, if you are correct, I go to heaven some lower tier with the Muslims and Scientologist. If evangelicals are correct you go to where the Muslims and Scientologists go, which is Hell. This is not worth gambling on.
Yes the reference to the wives may not be in your cannon but it was taught by your second prophet.
“When our father Adam came into the Garden of Eden, he came into it with a celestial body and brought Eve, one of his wives, with him… He [Adam!] is our Father and our god and the only God with whom we have to do.” Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, 1:50
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 10:53pm@p8riot
The problem with using Abraham, Moses, and others is they were sinners. The real hitch in the Mormon belief is as Brigham Young said you needed polygamy to even get to heaven. Those men were not in polygamy for religious reasons, they did it out of practicality. Rich men could provide so they of course had multiple wives.
I know these things are not in the cannon because people would reject them and not give Mormonism a shot if you laid out all of the stuff that is kind of out there. It is widely talked about how the LDS keeps things like this from the church even though the higher ups believe it. Lets not forget that polygamy was part of your faith and only because Utah wanted to become a state was it changed.
See I dont believe in a pope or prophet telling me what to think. I talk to God and I am guided by God through prayer. He made it that way so I didnt need a man(sinner) telling me what God thinks. Do Mormons not believe in prayer?
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 12:52pm@MUTINY – Honestly, you and I have never discussed how you (Mutiny) are the same person formerly known as Martinez… So thanks for clearing that up – that actually makes a lot of sense looking back at our past conversations.
Thus, I’ve given you so many biblical verses so many times in the past supporting our theology and you continue to reject the literal meaning of what they say… so I think we’re just going to have to agree to disagree. :-)
I am curious though, in your rebuttal to the biblical fact of sanctified plural marriage, you failed to address the one scripture I cited regarding the Prophet Nathan speaking directly for the Lord in telling David that the Lord himself GAVE David his multiple wives – and would have given him more if he wanted if he wouldn’t have murdered to take Bathsheba as a wife (2 Samuel 12:7-9). How do you explain that? You don’t believe the Lord was lying or was a “sinner” just as you claim Abraham, Jacob, and Moses were? Why then would the Lord himself reveal the law of how to care for plural wives (Exodus 21:10; see also Deuteronomy 21:15)? You can’t seriously doubt that plural marriage was at one time was ordained of God and practiced by his holiest of Prophets and Patriarchs. If you do, then you are not accepting the Bible to literal. Sorry, but you can‘t pick and choose which teachings you’ll accept to fit your theology.
continued:
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 12, 2012 at 1:12pmContinued:
You said: “See I dont believe in a pope or prophet telling me what to think. I talk to God and I am guided by God through prayer. He made it that way so I didnt need a man(sinner) telling me what God thinks. Do Mormons not believe in prayer?”
Brother, please listen to what you just said. Do you know that you‘re not the first to reject God’s living Prophet? Do you know that many of those who rejected God’s Prophets used the same excuse that you use – that they didn’t need or believe in Prophets, that they could figure it out on their own…
Please see the following for examples. It is always better to learn from others’ mistakes rather than your own.
1 Kgs. 19:10 (Rom. 11:3); 2 Kgs. 17:14; 2 Chr. 24:21; 2 Chr. 36:16; Isa. 30:10; Jer. 1:19; Jer. 11:19 (Jer. 18:18); Jer. 11:21; Jer. 12:6; Jer. 26:8; Jer. 37:15; Jer. 44:5; Ezek. 20:49; Matt. 5:12 (Luke 6:23); Matt. 10:41; Matt. 13:57 (Mark 6:4; Luke 4:24; John 4:44); Matt. 21:35; Matt. 23:31; Matt. 23:37 (Luke 13:34); Luke 11:50; Luke 13:33; Luke 16:31; Acts 7:52; 1 Thes. 2:15; Heb. 11:37; Rev. 16:6.
Of course, we all must receive personal revelations in our lives through prayer and the Comforter. However, from the beginning of time, it is irrefutable that the Lord used living Prophets to lead the Church (and the world) as a whole. Amos 3:7 – “Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.”
Have a great weekend!
…
Report Post »drbage
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:09pmThe story was not supposed to expose some hidden truth, but rather sling some mud. If it sticks, so be it; if it doesn’t “oh, well.” This is the same M.O. that Plouffe and Axelrod have been using since day one of the campaign.
Report Post »