Government

Bernanke Defends $600 Billion Shadow Stimulus

JEKYLL ISLAND, Ga. (AP) — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke defended the Fed’s new $600 billion program to aid the economy on Saturday, rejecting concerns that it will spur runaway inflation.

Critics, including some Fed officials, fear that all the money being injected into the economy could ignite inflation or speculative bubbles in the prices of bonds or commodities.

Speaking to a conference on the Georgia coast, Bernanke said the new program, announced Wednesday, won’t push inflation to “super ordinary” levels.

The Fed will buy $600 billion worth of government bonds in a bid to make loans cheaper and get Americans to spend more. Doing so would help the economy and prompt companies to boost hiring.

The economy hasn’t been growing fast enough to reduce unemployment, which has been stuck at a high of 9.6 percent for three straight months. The Fed worries that high unemployment, lackluster wage gains and still-weak home values will weigh on consumer spending, a major drive of overall economic activity.

Because companies are loath to raise retail prices in this climate, inflation has been running at very low levels. That gives the Fed leeway to launch the new aid program.

Earlier in the week, Bernanke expressed confidence that once the economy is on firm footing, the Fed will be able to smoothly soak up all that money without harming the economy and unleashing inflation.

___

AP Economics Writer Jeannine Aversa in Washington contributed to this report.

Comments (21)

  • hempstead1944
    Posted on November 8, 2010 at 7:59am

    The money changers are still in the temple…..don’t look for anything different …..

    Report Post »  
  • Tony Nagy
    Posted on November 8, 2010 at 5:59am

    I’m in hospital for 3 days, only to find they are still digging the hole deeper for you guys?…. WTF?…. Spooooooky Dude, enough already…. BOZ MEG!!!

    Report Post » Col. HawK  
  • Sledgehammer
    Posted on November 7, 2010 at 7:39pm

    Him and the yard gnome, are two guys I’d love to question with a baseball bat! I want to know where every penny went to, and why?

    Report Post » Sledgehammer  
    • OneRepublic4us
      Posted on November 7, 2010 at 9:04pm

      So you want to know where every penny went to. Gee, if only the constitution granted us that right. OH! Wait! It does! I think we should all call for an accounting of our money!

      Report Post » OneRepublic4us  
  • justice
    Posted on November 7, 2010 at 6:14pm

    do they actually think we buy this crap. they want to put more money in their pockets at or expense. they are actually the smart ones , because til lately we let them get by with it. but now we are awake.

    Report Post »  
  • adifftake
    Posted on November 7, 2010 at 6:09pm

    Ben you should seriously consider sueing your economics schools and profs. Either you are a monumental idiot or you are a very dangerous communist.
    Tell you what Benny. Let’s you and me play a game of monopoly. Right at the end, right before you deal me the crushing blow, I will excuse myself and return with a wad of money from another monopoly game.
    Will you allow me to continue to play, or will you complain it’s not right for me to inject more money?

    Report Post »  
  • SilentReader
    Posted on November 7, 2010 at 5:12pm

    Bernanke is a traitor. He is doing precisely what he said he would never do!

    Report Post » SilentReader  
  • AmericanLass
    Posted on November 7, 2010 at 5:02pm

    The comment about spooky dude is correct.

    Report Post » AmericanLass  
  • tobywil2
    Posted on November 7, 2010 at 5:02pm

    INFLATION – STEALTH TAXATION

    The tyrants (Wannabe Peers) would have you believe that taxes are only increased when the legislature passes a law increasing or creating a new tax. Actually, the tax on the economy is increased whenever the government spends money. The Wannabe Peers use the confusion over the relationship between wealth and the medium of exchange (money) to perpetuate this myth. Money, (paper money) has no intrinsic value. The dollar’s value is determined by the quantity of wealth the market is willing to exchange for the dollar.

    The figure at the end of this article is a simplified representation of the relationship between the medium of exchange (dollar) and wealth. It shows that the value of the dollar is equal to the “nation’s wealth” divided by the quantity of dollars and credit in circulation. The economy is a complicated and somewhat sluggish entity. The economy can sometimes take years to respond to changes in increases in the quantity of dollars in circulation (especially when the process is complicated by government borrowing and innovation or increased productivity). However, when large increases in the medium of exchange or reductions in the wealth available in the market occur quickly, the response can be both rapid and catastrophic. This type of event can occur when the government prints large quantities of money to purchase wealth and remove that wealth from the market place or natural disasters occur, which destroy wealth. An example would be the hyper-inflation experienced by Germany in the early 1930s.

    The value of the dollar can also be affected by factors other than the quantity of dollars in circulation. Innovation, which reduces the labor or material content of wealth, can increase the value of the dollar when the quantity of dollars in circulation remains constant. Conversely, government rules and regulations that increase the labor and all material content of wealth without a corresponding increase in value can reduce the value of the dollar even though the quantity of dollars in circulation remains constant.

    Inflation is not a recent phenomenon. “Pieces of silver,” the medium of exchange of the Roman Empire, started out as almost pure silver. When the Roman Empire fell, the “pieces of silver” were almost pure copper. During the 19th Century the inflation rate in the United States was 12% for the entire Century. In 1800, $0.89 had the purchasing power of $1.00 in 1900, a change of about 12% in 100 years. From 1900 to 2007 the inflation rate was about 25 to 1, a change of 2500% in 107 years. A Google search lists over 20 pages of “inflation calculators.” Three of the most popular inflation calculators list the inflation rate of between 24.6 and27.71 from 1900 and 2007. In other words, one 1900 dollar had the purchasing power of twenty-five 2007 dollars.

    What happened? In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s four factors emerged that caused inflation to increase. These are:

    • Creation of the “Fourth Branch of Government,” the bureaucracy
    • Enacting and enforcing the Sherman Antitrust Act.
    • Creation of the Federal Reserve and elimination of “hard” money
    • Enacting the income tax
    • Wars

    How did these factors cause such erosion in the value of the dollar? Chapter 9 of “21st Century Common Sense” explains in simple terms how these factors produced inflation of the dollar and aided the “Wannabe Peers” in usurping our freedom. http://commonsense21c.com/

    Report Post » tobywil2  
    • OneRepublic4us
      Posted on November 7, 2010 at 9:00pm

      I have to admit I saw Glenn Beck explain this and I went shopping for dried milk, rice and other provisions. It’s easily explained as a backdoor tax.

      Report Post » OneRepublic4us  
  • Juan Gault
    Posted on November 7, 2010 at 4:00pm

    Less government spending, reduce existing taxes. That is the time tested solution. easy,as most solutions are.

    Report Post »  
    • OneRepublic4us
      Posted on November 7, 2010 at 8:58pm

      YES! I thought I was the first one to think of it but I guess we’re both smarter than the communists!

      Report Post » OneRepublic4us  
  • Spokavriel
    Posted on November 7, 2010 at 3:03pm

    So to improve the economy they want to make more bubbles to float the egg shells people are already walking on. Yeah that won’t increase uncertainty which is the #1 thing crippling our economy at the moment.

    Report Post » Spokavriel  
  • kathleenhenthorn
    Posted on November 7, 2010 at 2:43pm

    Oh Bullcrap!!!

    Report Post »  
    • HKS
      Posted on November 7, 2010 at 3:01pm

      A…spooky………..dude………..made………..me……………do………….it…………….aaaaaaa.

      Report Post » HKS  
    • Spokavriel
      Posted on November 7, 2010 at 3:05pm

      You mean you don‘t believe an economy that isn’t producing anything to spend the money on can absorb more currency than it would take to buy everything people already were not buying? Get outta here ;)

      Report Post » Spokavriel  
    • Juan Gault
      Posted on November 7, 2010 at 3:57pm

      Ben is pushing on da string. didn‘t work QE 1 and won’t on QE2.

      Report Post »  
    • uncleherbert
      Posted on November 7, 2010 at 4:00pm

      bernacky has no brains!!!!

      Report Post » uncleherbert  
    • grandmaof5
      Posted on November 7, 2010 at 7:04pm

      Nothing he has done so far has worked so I don’t know how he expects anyone to believe this will. When did they say he would be out of a job? Soon, I hope, and hopefully someone who knows what they are doing waltz’ in and saves the day.

      Report Post »  
    • snowleopard3200 {mix art}
      Posted on November 7, 2010 at 8:02pm

      @Kathleenhenthorn

      Agreed with your post 100%

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • ru12
      Posted on November 8, 2010 at 5:44am

      Call it like you SMELL it!
      I still think a PAYROLL TAX HOLIDAY would work wonders. Everyone would have a little extra money to spend on everyday things instead of gobs of money somehow getting “INVESTED” into the commodities market, thereby pushing up the price of all our essentials. IDIOTS! Think of how many small businesses might have made it with just a few thousand dollars extra each month had they had that tax holiday. And, thus, how many little jobs would have been saved…and how much of our unemployment funds would have been saved, and how much in food stamps and so on….

      Report Post »  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In