Bestiality Advocate in Canada Charged With…Well, You Guessed It
- Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:49am by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
Brian Cutteridge, 38, has made his thoughts on bestiality well known. He’s a fan of it, to say the least. And now he’s set to go on trial in Canada for practicing it.
The British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals says it obtained video of Cutteridge engaging in sex acts with his dog. That video has now led to charges.
Brian Cutteridge, 38. (Facebook via CBC News)
“The B.C. SPCA first started investigating this case back in 2010 when we received some information that this individual was sexually interacting with his dogs, which is illegal in Canada,” SPCA spokesperson Marcie Moriarty told CBC News.
Cutteridge has been an outspoken advocate of the practice. For example, he once wrote a paper called, “For the Love of Dog: On the Legal Prohibition of Zoophilia in Canada and the United States.”
“Laws proscribing zoophilia are unjust inasmuch as this consideration of why is given paramount legal weight,” he writes. “They seek to punish those who engage in sexual contact with animals for their own sexual gratification, ignoring the fact that animals are regularly subjected to sexual interference for commercial purposes through such procedures as manual and electronic semen collection and artificial insemination (AI).”
He also argues that such acts are part of a longstanding history, and that prohibiting them violates basic human rights.
“He feels very strongly that that should be something that’s legal,” Moriarty said. “He feels those relationship with his dogs are equivalent to a marriage-type relationship and that’s not the case in Canada, thank goodness, and it can impact the welfare of the animals.”
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 694 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 662 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 524 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 364 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 341 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 231 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 238 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order Read More- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 231 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (403)
vaman
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:11amOh yeah, to make some fantasy connection to gay marriage! No doubt many of the blaze readers will make this utterly stupid connection.
Report Post »littlefish
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:23amSeems YOU were the FIRST !!! . .. .
Me thinks thou protests too much . . . . . .
Report Post »inblack
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:26amThere is only one connection between this and gay sex.
People considered both deviant sexual behavior.
Well then there is gay bestiality – but that is not really a connection as much as both at the same time.
Anyway, what was your point?
Report Post »Justus39
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:26amHow could you not make such a connection you idiot.
Report Post »Balthazor
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:27amYeah, just like it was utterly stupid to say that legalized abortion would one day open the door to legalized infanticide. But look, now we have so-called “ethicists” arguing for exactly that. So I‘m sure you’re right, there’s NO chance that legalized gay marriage could EVER be used to argue for legalized bestiality. Just utterly stupid to even think that.
Report Post »Shenandoahvalleypatriot
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:28amWhen the definition of marriage has changed from One Man and One Woman to Man and Man or Woman and Woman it won‘t be long until some nut says it’s unconstitutional to deny them marrying his dog. After all there is no longer an accepted definition of marriage.
There is one aspect of life that liberals will never understand and that is Human Nature!
Report Post »VicksVaporub
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:32amAs long as they weren‘t using birth control it’s ok by Santorum.
Report Post »Epic Fail
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:48amSo he wants to marry his dog? Is that next after gay marriage is allowed? There I did it….
Report Post »Joe Schmuck
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:16amMany of the points I’ve heard to justify differences in lifestyle, can very well be used to justify druggies and alcoholic’s as well as bestiality, pedophiles’, wife beaters, serial killers, and so on.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:19amShenandoahvalleypatriot
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:28am
When the definition of marriage has changed from One Man and One Woman to Man and Man or Woman and Woman it won‘t be long until some nut says it’s unconstitutional to deny them marrying his dog. After all there is no longer an accepted definition of marriage.
There is one aspect of life that liberals will never understand and that is Human Nature!
_____________________
Of course bigots like you and Little Rick Santorum, forget one word. CONSENTING, the issue is why the hell should bigots like yourself and other Christian Conservatives have a say in defining the relationship between two CONSENTING adults.
ambwoster
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:20amWow you have some animals in your closet and thank dirtbag for putting Canada on the world stage for yet another embarassment.
Report Post »weneedrubio
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:21amNot that there’s anything wrong with that…
Report Post »Listen_then_think
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:31amHah! Face vaman!
Report Post »You got owned by your stupid remark, way to not think it through.
Ruler4You
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:38amYou have to know that this battle “IS” coming to the U.S. thanks to the GLBT lobby. After all, they just made it legal in the military last year.
Report Post »Listen_then_think
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:43am@encinom
Report Post »Because it is wrong, unnatural, disgusting, wrong, dirty (how AIDS started with monkeys) and wrong. Funny how things (encinom, the dregs of civilization) without values or morals think everything is OK. Its how every empire falls.
The Jewish Avenger
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:44amHmm… Instantly on the defensive assuming that we would corelate it to homosexuality. Gee this never crossed my mind. In fact it at first glance doesnt seem to correlate
OH WAIT! One of the most common arguments is that animals have gay sex all the time…
oh now! I see! Thank you so much! I NEVER would have put the two together but you have shown me the path… thanks so much.
That being said (no offense to homosexuals), is castration a punishment in Canada? This is sick on so many levels…
But gee to stretch out like that and reverse-psychology us to consider homosexuality and beastiality as the same thing…. truly remarkable.
(Again, no offense to homosexuals, but if were you I’d be pissed at this guy)
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:52amEncinom must hear his dog saying, “YES YES YES Do me now.”
Report Post »Joe Schmuck
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:55amOne problem with consenting adults deciding anything pertaining to our society is, you end up pushing their ideology down the throats of school kids.
For that matter, 2 consenting adults could agree to rob a bank.
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:07amOur dear leader does it all the time and I don’t mean Barney.
Report Post »robert
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:09am“WatchBestiality Advocate in Canada Charged With…Well, You Guessed It”
Such an outrage to little animals. This disgustingly evil creep should be executed.
The only reason he would ever suggest such a thing is because homosexuals have had some succes at promoting their perversions.
Bestiality and homsexuality are both mental disorders that can be cured.
It’s disgusting both types of evil people prefer to continue on with their sick lifestyle.
Report Post »jado1981
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:12amWell, SURELY, he was just born this way… it’s not like someone would actually CHOOSE to do this. Isn’t that the same argument that some homosexual people use.
I used this same example with one of my friends who is gay. He said, “come on, that’s completely insane. Nobody could make that argument.” And to that, I told him it was only a matter of time. Sadly.
Report Post »D-Fence
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:14amHow F’d up is this guy? Unbelieveable.
Report Post »Espada
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:19am“Of course bigots like you and Little Rick Santorum, forget one word. CONSENTING, the issue is why the hell should bigots like yourself and other Christian Conservatives have a say in defining the relationship between two CONSENTING adults.”
- ENCINOM
***********************
How can you be REALLY sure the dog consents, every time ?
Report Post »SweetDoug
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:22amThis, in years from now, will be looked back upon as the opening stage of the Overton Window on this subject.
Canada is a social democracy, in a pluralistic society, governed by a constitutional democracy.
Not many Canadians know this. Or understand it, in the sense of how it governs, and influences the shaping of our society.
We are/have devolved into a morally relativistic society.
There is no reason to deny anyone who wishes to have sex with an animal, this “right”, in a pluralistic society, because, as a short definition would suffice, “Anything goes.”
“Who are you to judge!?”
The Canadian constitution, under section 27, which many Canadians do not know of, but shake their heads at the judgements that come down from upon high, are predicated up this:
“ This Charter shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the preservation and enhancement of the multicultural heritage of Canadians. ”
So if I can own a dog, why can’t I eat it? It’s my dog.
So really, if you subscribe, to a (I dare say, Libertarian mindset?!) to a pluralistic society, how can this not happen?
Dogs have no rights. They are animals. Not people. We eat dogs. We just don’t understand why. Ours is not to judge. We can’t be culturally imperialistic. Therefore, we should allow this.
This is how the logic will ultimately, prevail.
God, I hope I’m wrong.
God help Canada.
•∆•
Report Post »V-V
Joe Schmuck
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:22amHe’s barking up the wrong tree ….
Report Post »RonmeyPaulBotsrOdd
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:55amWould be completely acceptable if it were a muslim doing it…whether it be lack of prosecution due to fear or religious protections (what is not protected via Sharia outside of being a non-muslim?). Lets not forget the two words that should justify this for everyone that supports gay marriage (how do you define marriage with bisexuality involved??) – SLIPPERY SLOPE
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:10pmand as soon as gays can get full rights to get married (changing the actual definition of the word marriage) the next step will be lowering the age of consent, so gay men can start getting access to younger and younger boys, then it will be the bestiality laws and other such perverse sickness.
What say you ENCINOM? Pass on some huministic filth to good old Ranger Dan.
Report Post »terriergal
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:12pmI guess we have a troll.
Report Post »joelack55
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:13pmlets see. bestiality and homosexuality are both legal in the armed forces. they kind of go arm in arm
Report Post »SLARTIBARTFAST
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:44pmMaybe he‘s just a dog born in a man’s body. Hmmm………..This sounds kinda’ familiar, don’t it?
Report Post »horvath
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:48pmObviously this dog is a gay slut…
Report Post »StanO360
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:26pmThey are completely related! Both are unnatural, both deviant, there may be a “propensity” for both. Don’t argue a homosexual gene, that is not logical, as it would be self eliminating from the population.
Both propose an elimination of ancient proscriptions that have been established for the health and well being of families and societies. Not the same, but the same logic.
Report Post »Steven63
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:50pmOf course there is a connection. Anytime you tear down the boundaries that society was built upon the inevitable question becomes “so where do we draw the line?”
So, where do we draw the line? If it’s okay for a man to lay down with a man, why the heck isn’t it okay for a man to lay down with whatever else is out there? And who the hell are you to say it isn’t okay?
Are you a bigot?
Do you have a phobia?
Why are you so limited in your ability to deal with the broader society?
Shouldn’t you be tolerant, just like heterosexuals were told to be?
Report Post »000degrees
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:13pmencinom, did the dog consent???
Report Post »Zer0
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:27pmReal classy Blaze, real classy. Why is this story being covered on this site? There is no other news worthy of coverage? Why is a Canadian sexual deviant being given this attention? What about the Unions’ plan to attempt to skew the GOP primary by voting for “Slick” Rick Santorum to sabotage Romeny on Super Tuesday? Is this an attempt at Lulz?
This should be a tremendous embarrassment for your staff and sponsors for posting this story.
Report Post »Crush_Liberalism
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:37pmWho the heck made THAT comparison? Well, besides YOU, that is?
Report Post »Seat-pounders agreeing to pound each otherss seat exclusively, and calling that “marriage” is an entirely different that some sicko who wants to pound his dog….two completely different things….but hey, for the record – YOU made that comparison!
Susie
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:38pmVANMAN said, “Oh yeah, to make some fantasy connection to gay marriage! ”
Report Post »Well VAMAN – Homosexuals have succeeded in destroying marriage in Canada.
So I guess, if the show fits……….
airportengineer
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:51pmOnly 1 word sums up that post…..WHAT????
Second thought, Moron Liberal!
Report Post »Bible Quotin' Science Fearin' Conservative American
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:57pmIs that a dog or is it Michelle Bachman?
WatchingThePuppetShow
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:01pmYeah there’s no correlation between homosexuality and Bestiality. Let’s see, do either procreate the human race…hummm, nope. IF it was ‘natural’ mankind would have been a blip on the timeline of life. Don‘t think that the gay ’rights‘ movement hasn’t forcibly pushed open the pandora’s box of this issue. Next grown men or women for that much will claim that they have the ‘right’ to marry a 7 year old because they are ‘in love’.
It‘s funny how the gay rights movement has constantly pandered it’s lie to the public and just like any lie repeated enough over time becomes truth in the eyes of the sheeple. So we sit back an accept it.
Report Post »RebelYell1862
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:07pmLike a man poking another man up the ass is “NORMAL.”
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:14pmVAMAN….what’s the difference? The dog and the man love each other…why deny them their “rights”? Isn’t that the same thing homosexuals are saying? Let’s get the NAMBLA crowd in on this too….they purport the same thing. Why are you denying them their rights to be together? Rights..rights…rights. Everybody’s got “rights” in liberalville. You awful, backward thinking, cruel, uncaring, unconstiutional person VAMAN. Denying two beings their “right” to be together how could you?
Report Post »robert
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:16pmEncicom:
“……the issue is why the hell should bigots like yourself and other Christian Conservatives have a say in defining the relationship between two CONSENTING adults.”
Because two sick people content to practice perversions doesn’t make the abnormal act acceptable, because it is still a disgusting perversion against the laws of nature. Homosexuals have mental illnesses that compel them to participate in vile practices, just one step lower…but not by much…..than bestiality.
And as for as your excuse based on the term “consenting adults,” that phrase can also be an excuse in arguing for bestiality, because the little animal can certainly be consenting, by being trained that way, as disgusting as it is.
Bestiality is no less than a crime against defenseless little animals and the perp should be executed.
Human perverts should be given the option of undergoing intense psychotherapy or placed in a homosexual colony on an island somewhere, as lepers once were, because both diseases are detrimental to mankind and should be isolated.
Lepers at least have just one disease to pass along that could infect the general population, but homosexuals have unusually high incidents of Aids, Syphillis, gonorhrea, Pap V viruses in addition to susceptibility to many others. Since they use parts of the body that are not meant for sex, they have high incidents of anal cancer as well, many of them having to be treated from the public dole.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:19pmHmmmm..“impact the wellfare of the animals” is being invoked as a reason to deny Cutteridge his perverse pleasure. Well…..over 55% of new cases each year of HIV in the U.S. are attributed to homosexual males. This is an over representation of 2,750%. Clearly and without a shred of doubt male homosexual sex practices “impact the welfare of human beings”. So why aren’t we as caring and prohibitive about that as we are about bestiality? Anyone? Beuller?
Report Post »RebelYell1862
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:29pm@vaman Yeah, like two men screwing and getting married is “normal”. You’re as sick as this perv.
Report Post »robert
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:33pmJewishavenger:
“But gee to stretch out like that and reverse-psychology us to consider homosexuality and beastiality as the same thing…. truly remarkable.”
Nobody claimed the two perversions were the same thing only that both WERE sick perversions, which they are.
The argument is that acceptance of homosexual marriage is a lead in to other forms of unnatural bondings of which bestiality is one. It‘s an argument that has been presented many times and the intellectual argument can’t be dismissed as haveing no basis in similarity.
The poster above is right. If same sex marriage gets a firmer hold in this country there will be further attempts to legalize other forms of bondings, one of which is polygomy, in addition to many others including beastiality. If the definition of marriage is defined as a legal bonding between entities I seriously doubt that the legal systen can deny other unions.
And so far as animals engaging in homosexuality goes, if you intended that to be serious, there is no such thing. The instinct for procreation is even stronger in animals than it is in humans. I’ve never seen two male birds building a nest together.
Report Post »Jacque
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:38pmSounds like you have issues about that, not us! Look in the mirror! Take personal reponsibility for your own issues, oh wait libs don’t need personal reposibility they are owned by the government.
Slavery is still slavery whether your owned by a man or a government.
Report Post »roach
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:43pmThere is obviously a very real connection. Where does it stop. Maybe we need to take a look at child molesters and give them rights to marry 12 year olds as well.
These people are sick in the head, and need to be treated as such.
Report Post »cosette
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:15pm@ Bible quotin…. That’s it? That‘s all ya’ got? Lame.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:58pmvaman
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:11am
Oh yeah, to make some fantasy connection to gay marriage! No doubt many of the blaze readers will make this utterly stupid connection.
************************************************************************************************
Nothing stupid about it! It’s merely an observation of the “snowball” effect, or “downward spiral” in morality. As soon as one sexual perversion is “normalized”, then the rest of the perverts want in on the action. Since the “snowball” started rolling faster with the election of the first “No Child Left Behind, Affirmative Action” president, we have even seen pedophiles try to legitimize their horrifying perversion. So, yea, I see the connection. And it’s not “stupid”. It is blindness not to see the connection!…………………..
Report Post »Smokey_Bojangles
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 6:28pmHe was Born that Way.You folks are being Bigoted Zoophiliaphobes. He Deserves his own show just like Ellen,Rosie and Anderson Cooper.
Report Post »ModerationIsBest
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 6:51pm@ROBERT
One could argue believing in a God is a mental disorder.
Report Post »robert
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:47pmModerationIsBest
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 6:51pm
@ROBERT
“One could argue believing in a God is a mental disorder.”
I’m not sure what your point is there. Anybody can argue for or against anything. But unless the point being contended has some basis in logic and facts it amounts to no more than nonsense.
There is no parallel between an addiction to vices and perversions and believing in a supreme being or higher power. You might have an argument if you argued that religious fanaticism, carried to the extreme as is typical of Muslim jihadists, can also be a mental disorder.
But making an intellectual choice regarding spirituality is hardly on a par with habits that are emotionally based and induced habitually to the point they represent known pathologies.
Homosexuals pull every trick they can think of out of the hat to try to flim flam people into accepting what they do as being in the mainstream. They’re curable. I don‘t see why they just don’t undergo pschiatric therapy.
People will give lip service to get along, but no one really is accepting of homosexuals, and no amount of nonsensical spin to try to persuade people otherwise is going to work.
And their attempts to change thinking is a wasted effort, because I firnly believe this country is headed for breakup, after and during this worsening economic situation. When it does, all things PC will evaporate overnight.
Report Post »ModerationIsBest
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:11pm@ROBERT
What do you think of a little kid when they claim they can see, talk to and hear an imaginary friend?
Do you think there is actually someone there?
Report Post »robert
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 10:44pmModerationIsBest
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:11pm
@ROBERT
“What do you think of a little kid when they claim they can see, talk to and hear an imaginary friend?
Do you think there is actually someone there?”
It’s not clear what parallel you might be trying to draw, but if it is my reference to hypnotized subjects being able to recall conversations and environment descriptions before and after birth, your “imaginary friend” point doesn’t prove anything.
The hypnotized subjects I was referring to were not taken at their word. People in the field investigated certain cases and found them to be true by talking to the parents of the subject and other witnesses. If you do a bit of research on age regression in hypnosis you‘ll find it’s quite common.
“Imaginary friends” isn’t a parallel to the instances I gave.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:10amAbomitable – hope he rots in jail.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:46amSnow, did you by any chance mean “0bominable?”
Report Post »Crush_Liberalism
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:42pmWhat is an Abominiate? LOL..just kidding. I hate mistypes!
Report Post »vaman
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:09amI wonder why the blaze ran with this article???
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:18am.
So we could make crude jokes about this dude……….
Gives a whole new meaning to “Here Boy! Come, Sit Goooooooood Dooooogggyyy…..
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:29amBaddoggy! ROFLMAO….
Report Post »Epic Fail
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:50amRoll over doggie. Gooooood dogieeeeee….
Report Post »SoupSandwich
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:36amBeck bought lots of stock in peanut butter. You didn’t? Go smooth, chunky will give you rashes.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:57am.
Report Post »Soup,
I hate to ask, but how do you know Chuncky will give you a rash?……….
libtardian-refugee
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:23amReminds me of an old ACDC song, “Givin”the Dog a Bone”
Report Post »crackerone
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:15pmBark once for faster, twice for slower!
Report Post »formidable_foe
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:00pmReading this article was kind of rough… really ruff…. ruff, ruff…. LOL.
Report Post »YUCON
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:28pmIt gives a new meaning to doggy style
Report Post »ROMANS 10-9
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:08am…
Shame on that Dog for not Biting him!
Report Post »ambwoster
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:21amYeah what a slut
Report Post »ROMANS 10-9
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:07am.
YES!
Judge this man
…guilty!
Report Post »inblack
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:27amHe admits it, so you do not need to judge him guilty.
Report Post »noland
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:07amsounds just like an obamanation voter, he can always move to washington, sick deminted progressive Bastard!
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:06am.
I wonder if they got stuck butt to butt?……..
I’ll never think of “Puppy Love” the same from now on………….
Report Post »Tom K
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:00pm@SPANKDAMONKEY: “ Stuck butt to butt ” Now that is soooo sick and funny at the same time. A guy in North Florida was doing the neighbor’s horses and he is so far under the jail that no one can find him.
Report Post »ROMANS 10-9
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:05am…
One Human Man + One Human Woman = Holy Marriage
Anything else is Sin!
Report Post »Jase
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:56pmThen Barack’s a sinner ’cause he married a horse.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:15pmZira is a horse?
Report Post »GBTVFan_Non_American_Overseas
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:53pmI thought he was married to a cow, or a moose….this is so confusing!!!
Report Post »dj109
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 6:38pmIn a liberal’s world, anything goes… Nothing’s taboo.
Report Post »FightThePower
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:04amfirst gay marriage, then animals. Remember, he was just born that way.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:44amYeah, like Lady Gaga
Report Post »love the kids
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:03amIf he wants to marry the dog, and the dog is O.K. with it, should we judge this man?
Report Post »inblack
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:30amI’m having a hard time determining if the dog can consent to this behavior.
And before you tell me the dog is happy, remember many child molestation victims are happy as well.
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:53amUh, there are folks who HAVE married their dogs. Case in point:
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2010-12-02/news/27083045_1_pet-dog-wedding-honey
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:44ambiohazard23
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:53am
Uh, there are folks who HAVE married their dogs. Case in point:
——————————————————————————-
Yeah, but!….If the marriage wasn’t consecrated the dog could seek an annulment!….
…Damn, I’m bored…
Report Post »Norm D. Plume
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:15pmRemember this, when judging whether or not the dog can consent:
Dogs have teeth. If the dog wasn’t consenting, he would make his case plain.
Report Post »benahan davids
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:03amI just threw up in my mouth. wow. cant believe that people are into this. weird and just horribly gross.
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:03amHey, MOD, here is today’s example of how morality continues to disgustingly decline in a secular world. Welcome to the future you advocate. You’re gonna miss us Christians some day.
Oh and check out another fine atheist article on Ted Turner on Drudge. He coulda been a prez contender. lol
Are you catching a daily theme? A world without God is one frightening and sick place.
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:01amHey, CoPats! Sent you an email a couple of days ago. What’s up? BTW, I wouldn’t let this guy anywhere near my 2 dogs!
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:29amHey Girl! How the heck are ya? Just got your mail and sent one back. Missed ya around here! Glad to hear the little man is here and healthy!
Gotta run for now. Catch ya later, gator!
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:31amAnd right there with ya, Girl, ’bout not letting this guy near my dog! Sick, sick, sick!
Report Post »SoundStride
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:03amSounds like hes a secret Muslim http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKEBcb3mRHQ
Report Post »AJAYW
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:16amThe great religion of obama
Report Post »morerightrudder
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:46amBad dog! No bisquit!
Report Post »love the kids
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:01amToo bad he wasn’t in the US Military or his actions would have been legal!!!
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:54amAnother DEMOCRAT Barry voter heard from.
Report Post »terriergal
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:16pmNO, actually they are trying to make it legal in the military. This is not a comment on the honor of our veterans but a comment on the encroachment of liberalism.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:00amWell…If you see nothing wrong with sexual relations and/or marriage with your own gender, changing your own sex, or teaching my children that these things are normal and acceptable…then why not? I mean, if the dog is enjoying it…Just another sexual perversion, where do you draw the line?
Report Post »old white guy
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:59amand the world continues it’s downward spiral.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:58am.
Is the dog ok?…..
It must be a tiny lil’pecker…..
Report Post »SoupSandwich
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:34amWere they specific on the roles? Couldn’t watch… could be he was taking from the dog?
Report Post »morerightrudder
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:48amMaybe Oral.
Report Post »jakartaman
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:57amI am not going to touch this with a 10′ pole
and no I did not watch the video
evil!!
Report Post »Speak without Fear
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:56amSICK-O!
Mentally deranged liberal.
I hope and pray that he is kept far away from animals….children……
Report Post »Jenny Lind
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:56am???????????What I needed first thing in the morning-please Blaze, enough with this kind of trash, it’s disgusting, and has no place where decent people try to come to get real news , not the Inquirer. This isn’t right, please re-think putting stuff like this on the Blaze. Worse than the Huffington Post.
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:12amJust had that very discussion, JENNY. We want to preserve ourselves from this perversity and keep our minds pure! The problem is……that is EXACTLY how so much slipped in to become legal in this country. Christians didn’t want to know about it and now it advanced such that it is shoved in our face daily.
I truly wish we didn’t but, sadly, we have to be aware of this perversity to defeat it.
Report Post »medic506
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:55amTwo guys were walking down the street and saw a male dog licking his jewels. One of the guys said “I wish I could do that”. The other one said “Me too, but I“m afraid he would bite me”.
Report Post »objectivetruth
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:31amThanks I about died laughing at your joke.Good twisted humor.I know others probaly think we are sick laughing at this but c’mon just how many people actually do this type of perverted stuff.Gives whole meaning to fido scratching as itch though.Or the expression of shake a leg.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:37amGood twisted humor.I know others probaly think we are sick laughing at this but c’mon just how many people actually do this type of perverted stuff.
————————————————————–
Ever been to New Zealand?
Baaaa…..
Report Post »SoupSandwich
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:55amA PSA letting all Cannucks in on the law would be usefull. They need to know or it will be Lebanon after ramadan and skittish barnyard critters everywhere.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:53amThat’s one sick puppy.
Report Post »HADEN0UGH
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:52amBet his parents are proud.
Report Post »blanco5
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:52amThis is one of those times I believe that the dog does need to have rights!
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:01amHow do you know the dog doesn’t enjoy it? Did you ask him? Maybe the dog can testify or press charges…
Report Post »inblack
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:32am@TROLLTRAINER
Is that your approach with child molestation as well.
Well if the child enjoyed it, it’s fine to molest and corrupt them… No!
Dog like children cannot consent to an act they cannot understand, so you need to find a new excuse for approving of this behavior.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:38aminblack, it was sarcasm…I am sorry you took it wrong.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:39amRon Paul would pass the buck and say that this is a State‘s rights issue here in the good ’ol U.S. of A.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:03amIn this case Ron Paul would be correct too. No need for the Federal government to waste time legislating laws or drawing up an Animal Bill of Rights…If this is a problem in any particular state…or city for that matter…then let them deal with it.
Something else to think about: Animal “rights” can fast become a slippery slope. I do not think anyone in their right mind, let alone a Christian, would condone this kind of behavior, however, in court animals are treated as property and we should have the right to do with our property as we see fit. Animal abuse is a fine line, and there is a need to protect animals from it, but again, it can become a slippery slope. What is abuse in one person’s eyes is acceptable in another.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:23amSo if a state wanted to endorse polygamy, Ron Paul would be in favor of that? What about Necrophelia? PEDOPHELIA? Oh, that’s right…. you have to have voluntary and consensual agreements between all parties, lol. Ron Paul believes that homosexuals should be allowed to marry, in states that recognize that, but also believes it to be wrong.
He has a record of supporting each state’s right to define marriage for itself… opposing attempts to overturn state anti-sodomy laws on one hand and to implement a federal constitutional amendment protecting marriage on the other. He also stated that there should be no limits in a “free society” and ALL voluntary agreements would be okay in the marital realm… 2 people, 7 people… 10… 15 plus their talking dogs which the 9th court in California said is okay as long as they nod their heads in agreement? Then all the legal chaos associated with this mess…
Ron Paul and his states rights double talk… same as his earmark double talk.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:50amI am of Libertarian opinion on this for the most part. You cannot legislate morality. If you need to create a law against every possible immoral act you can think of I am 100% certain that sooner or later someone will come along and do something you could have never imagined…
If it is a problem in certain localities, such as polygamy in Utah was, then it should be the local government that steps in to outlaw it…under consensus of the majority…
To do anything else is endorsing big government and the nanny state.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:22pmAthough we as conservatives “might” have a tiny bit of libertarian thought process… this is what I as a conservative truly believe regarding libertarianism.
For a conservative, there can never be a libertarian option because the conservative understands the social contract. He learned this in fourth grade when he figured out his obnoxious behavior annoys others, and if he shoots off his mouth, he might get beaten up.
The conservative understands the relationship between rights and responsibility, liberty and license. He recognizes that individual behavior is not always a private matter. Sometimes it’s between you and society, you and your neighbor, you and the vulnerable. Sometimes your behavior is, in fact, somebody else’s business.
The conservative understands that laws have the power to order behavior and encourage civilized society. The libertarian loses sleep, believing that legal restrictions and social norms exist just to oppress him. He could not be more wrong. No one is thinking of him at all.
With all the libertarian emphasis on personal liberty, there is remarkably little attention paid to personal obligation. In fact, the notion of obligation itself is almost anathema: No one should be forced to do anything.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:32pmTime_2_End…,
I do not disagree! Everyone doing his own thing is anarchy. Nothing is absolute. It is all a fine balance between protecting the rights of others yet maintaining the freedom to live your life as you see fit.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:42pmTRAINER. The libertarian belief that it is always unconstitutional for the federal government to interfere in a state matter would effectively vacate the basic civil rights the constitution was created to protect. For example, Ron Paul insists he is pro-life, but who would kick the abortion issue back to the individual states and let them decide which babies, in which states, will be allowed to live. So much for liberty right?
We as conservatives have a deep longing to live a noble life, but do not wish to live just for ourselves.
Report Post »Liberty is more than the freedom to do as one chooses. It is the freedom and the choice to do as one should.
West Coast Patriot
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:30pmTime_2, You again continue to show how truly ignorant you are. You are wrong with everything you ever say. Libertarians do believe that with individual liberty comes great individual responsibility. We do not push our views onto others. We also believe in strong punishment of those that harm others because of their actions. You always throw lies out like they are nothing as you are a liar. Paul does not believe in the things you say. Under your philosophy, we should get rid of all the states powers and have all the laws written and enforced by the federal government. That would be socialism. I am sorry that you have a hard time understanding true freedom and continue to call for socialism. Are you sure you are not an Obama supporter? Come out of the closet.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 6:31amLEFTCOAST.
Libertarianism has its basis in anarchism, as put forth by Murray Rothbard. Rothbard learned laissez-faire capitalism at Ayn Rand’s knee (Objectivism), then proceeded to steel those ideas and corrupt them, which led to modern day libertarianism, a polyglot of conflicting ideas, without a consistent moral foundation.
Report Post »