Politics

‘Betrayal’: New Paul Ad Savages Santorum

Ron Paul’s campaign is out with a new attack ad, this time setting its sights on surging rival Rick Santorum.

Titled “Betrayal,” the one-minute spot paints the former Pennsylvania senator as “the worst in Washington,” hitting him for voting to raise the debt ceiling and accusing him of taking money from lobbyists and siding with union bosses over workers.

The ad will air South Carolina starting Monday, one week out from the state’s primary.

As Politico noted, this is the first time the Texas congressman has gone after Santorum in a TV ad. It strongly resembles the anti-Newt Gingrich spot the Paul campaign ran in Iowa, which helped bring the former House Speaker’s numbers down before the caucuses, and could potentially have a similar effect on Santorum.

Just days out from the New Hampshire primary, a poll released Friday had Mitt Romney in first place at 40 percent among likely Republican voters in the state, Paul in second place at 17 percent and Santorum third with 11 percent.

Comments (485)

1 2 3 ... 7
  • heavyduty
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:27pm

    Give Ron Paul a couple of weeks and he will deny he ever endorsed this ad. Just like he did with all those antisemitic letters with his name on them. If you can’t run a news letter and take responsibility for it. Then how can we let him take the responsibility of running a complex nation as ours?

    Report Post »  
    • thriceconcussed
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:33pm

      You old status-quo shills are on your way out.

      Report Post »  
    • junior1971
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:35pm

      Regardless of whether one will vote for Ron Paul( or any other candidate for that matter), the information presented is most likely true. Along with all the info that we gather on all the others. Looks like were screwd.

      Report Post » junior1971  
    • mrsalvage2
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:36pm

      Status Quo Establishment Progressives

      Report Post » mrsalvage2  
    • A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:37pm

      @heavyduty,

      “If you can’t run a news letter and take responsibility for it. Then how can we let him take the responsibility of running a complex nation as ours?”

      Here’s a little more perspective on the newsletters.

      See here.

      Reality Check: Fair Coverage Ot The story behind the Ron Paul newsletters
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0hpiwfM2qo

      Report Post »  
    • CptStubbing
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:44pm

      Do you mean the newsletters written by James B. Powell?

      Report Post »  
    • Pigpen
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:46pm

      A DOCTORS LABOR IS NOT MY RIGHT is on the ball! You really have some great references! However, I remember someone ELSE who was called RACIST, BIGOTED, ****-PHOBIC, and ANTI-SEMITIC… Who was that? Oh, that’s right! The press called GLENN BECK all of those things!

      Report Post » Pigpen  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:46pm

      The worst that I’ve heard about Santorum is still not as bad as the worst about Paul.
      Between the two, I pick Santorum.

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • CptStubbing
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:48pm

      So, Ron Paul let some newsletters get through that had some inflammatory statements on them. Barack Obama has an AG that allowed Fast and Furious to happen. Ron Paul’s slight mismanagement may have hurt some people’s feelings, Barack Obama’s incompetence got American citizens killed.

      As Herman Cain would say; Apples and Oranges people, Apples and Oranges.

      Report Post »  
    • Pigpen
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:02pm

      RATIONAL MAN posted: “The worst that I’ve heard about Santorum is still not as bad as the worst about Paul.”

      Well, the worst I have heard about Rick Santorum is that he has thrown in with those same religious BIGOTS who savaged JFK for being Catholic when he ran for President. So Rick Santorum, who is a Roman Catholic, has thrown in with those Evangelicals who want to prevent the Mormon Romney from becoming President. Hmmmm Maybe Rick the “Jesus” candidate Santorum is proving that he is willing to do ANYTHING it takes to get the nomination? Not the integrity we were hoping for in a candidate for 2012.

      When did Catholics become Christians to the Evangelicals anyway? And don’t try to play us by saying that Evangelicals were ALWAYS supportive of Catholics. Too many of us Blazers are history buffs to be manipulated by that kind of nonsense.

      Report Post » Pigpen  
    • Pigpen
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:25pm

      RATIONAL MAN posted: “Your an idiot that can’t be educated and I see no need to defend myself against your bogus ranting.”

      Don’t call me names. I have not said anything disparaging about you. If your intent is to “educate” us Blazers, then maybe you should answer my questions to you. Like, what have you heard about Dr. Paul that compares to Rick Santorum’s low political manuevering by looking for support at any personal cost including this lame attempt of his to paint himself as the “anyone but Romney” candidate?

      Report Post » Pigpen  
    • Babeuf
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:29pm

      Riligious Bigots??? Well isn’t that the pot calling the kettle black :-)
      Paul’s brand of libertarianism is shared with the frequently overlapping John Birch Society, Constitution Party and Conservative Caucus (both founded by Howard Phillips), and the American branch of the Austrian School of Economics – the Ludwig von Mises Institute. Like Paul, these groups are located on the ultra-conservative end of the political spectrum. Their distinguishing feature is a brand of libertarianism in which the federal government is to be dramatically reduced in favor of “states’ rights” and, as described by the Constitution Party, local application of “jurisprudence based on biblical foundations.” This is theocratic libertarianism, the type of libertarian “freedom” promoted by Christian Reconstructionist Rousas J. Rushdoony. Theocratic libertarianism may sound like an oxymoron, but it appeals to a segment of the American population that could never embrace Ayn Rand’s atheistic Objectivism. It draws heavily from those in the South who still harbor anti-federal government animosity left over from the Civil War and Cold War warriors who sanctified capitalism as the godly alternative to atheistic communism. Read More, it gets better….
      http://www.talk2action.org/story/2012/1/4/234938/0298/Front_Page/Waiting_for_the_Day_When_We_Can_Say_We_re_All_Austrians_Ron_Paul_s_Brand_of_Libertarianism

      Report Post » Babeuf  
    • Pigpen
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:53pm

      RATIONAL MAN posted “Your post tells the story. Your[sic] a lunatic making stuff up…”

      BABEUF, was RATIONAL MAN referencing YOU in his above post?

      Report Post » Pigpen  
    • Shasta
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:54pm

      So suddenly, when discussing Ron’s awful newsletters, CptStubbing switches the Ron Paul attacks from republicans to Obummer. We should be focusing on Obummer all the time anyway, instead of the paulies attacks on everyone else

      Report Post » Shasta  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:09pm

      How about getting the best nominee first — THEN bashing Obama.

      Report Post »  
    • sawbuck
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:18pm

      I don’t know why Ron Paul or his supporters would want to go down this road of finger pointing.
      If he starts pointing fingers at Rick Santorum …
      Ron Paul …will find fingers pointing back at him .…

      How can Ron Paul with good conscience , work with the likes of that dirt-bag
      Barney Frank-n-thief…?

      Especially when Ron Paul knew/talked about the housing crisis / bubble about to burst
      and Barney Frank denying there was even a problem..?
      Yet Ron Paul “Knowing all this” ..still decides to team up with him.

      Just the fact that he teamed up with Barney Frank’s Defense Plan and
      legislation on legalizing marijuana ….
      Makes me wonder what he’s doing on the Republican ticket …

      In fact teaming up with Barney Frank ..
      He might as well make a deal with the devil..!

      It Makes me wonder about Ron Paul proclaiming to be a Christian….
      Like Obama……proclaims to be a Christian.
      Just another false prophet…!

      Report Post » sawbuck  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:35pm

      I’m a Recovering NeoCon and I approve this message.

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:23pm

      Ron Paul Letter to the GOP
      “I want to totally disassociate myself from the policies that have given us unprecedented deficits, massive monetary inflation, indiscriminate military spending, an irrational and unconstitutional foreign policy, zooming foreign aid, the exaltation of international banking, and the attack on our personal liberties and privacy,” he wrote in a letter offering advice to the Republican party: not a letter about the Obama administration — a letter about the Reagan administration. So this BS is nothing new from Dr. Kook. He would have kept the Soviet Union in place. He is as bright as a 15 watt light-bulb

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • MS Patriot
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:31pm

      It’s easy to attempt to lump Santorum in with the rest of the progressives. What most people don’t realize is he got caught up in the old school business as usually during his first experience into politics in Washington, D.C. Almost every House member and Senator who is newly elected falls into the trap of the compromise game played by the progressives. It has been difficult, but the TEA party has done a great job of identifying those candidates that can go to Washington and put their feet down against the pork spending and compromising of the progressive establishment.
      Romney is a new school progressive. Who will be easily defeated by Obama once the media begins it’s attacks on his religion.
      Gingrich is an old school progressive. He has enough baggage and reminds too many people of an old racist.
      Paul is an old school liberal, that calls himself a libertarian. He has dangerous international policies, dangerous domestic ideas about legalizing drugs and will be attacked as a racist by the mainstream media if nominated.
      Santorum has a chance to step in and defend all religions and particularly Christianity, which has been taken out of our schools and government at an alarming rate, even though those are the morals, ethics and values used to establish this great nation.

      The socialist have worked hard since WWII to remove our Christian-Judeo values from our country in order to defeat America. Without those values re established in our country our freedom is doom

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:38pm

      @rationalman “I want to totally disassociate myself from the POLICIES that have given us unprecedented deficits, massive monetary inflation, indiscriminate military spending, an irrational and unconstitutional foreign policy, zooming foreign aid, the exaltation of international banking, and the attack on our personal liberties and privacy,” Sounds like the TEA party. What is wrong with that?

      @heavyduty Here’s some proof that he did not write them.

      Reality Check: The name of a ‘Mystery Writer’ of one of Ron Paul‘s ’Racist’ newsletters:

      http://www.fox19.com/story/16458700/reality-check-the-name-of-a-mystery-writer-of-one-of-ron-pauls-racist-newsletters

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:40pm

      @heavyduty Here‘s Paul’s response in an interview: (Go to the 5:30 mark) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLonnC_ZWQ0

      - Interviewer: But you made money off of them?
      - Paul: I was still practicing medicine. That‘s probably why I wasn’t a very good publisher because I had to make a living.
      - Interviewer: But there are reports that you made a million dollars off of them in 1993.
      - Paul: I’d like to see that money.
      - Interviewer: But would you give it back?
      - Paul: To whom?
      - Interviewer: But if you made money off of them and you disavowed them.
      - Paul: Really?
      - Interview: Well, to charity.
      - Paul: That’s nonsense.
      - Interviewer: If you made money off of them and you disavowed it.
      - Paul: You know, I didn’t write them. I don’t endorse those views. And I’ve explained it many times.
      - Interviewer: So you read them but never did anything about them?
      - Paul: I never read that stuff. I probably became aware of it ten years after it was written. And it’s been going on twenty years that people have pestered me about this. And CNN does every single time… I didn’t write them. I didn’t read at the time. And I disavow them.
      - Interviewer: But you made money off of them.
      - Paul: If you know I made money off of them then you know more about my finances than I do… It was published for ten years. So if that was ONE PERCENT of all the newsletters, I MADE MONEY TALKING ABOUT GOLD STOCKS. I think you’re really confused on that.

      Report Post »  
    • chewfatlip
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 11:13pm

      Before you know it, Paul will blame Bush for it.

      Report Post »  
    • Patrick Henry II
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 11:48pm

      Some of the Paulies are a disgrace to Ron Paul. Some think Ron Paul is the only person who can save America. Ron Paul would be the first to dissagree with that because it is stupid and if true hopeless.
      Reality: Ron Paul is just another politician that at least makes an attempt and the bare minimum value and that is to use the Constitution and Voters as the authority. Several do not.

      Ron Paul is also amonng 3 wo do not want to allow the 2 greates weapons against America to exist. THat being man made global warming, and thetax code. Only Ron Paul, Rick Perry, and Rick Santorum want to put and end to both of those weapons the enemy has against us. Mitt Romney actually wants to keep in play both of these weapons agains America.

      Report Post » Patrick Henry II  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on January 8, 2012 at 7:23am

      MS PATRIOT, very true. Is Santorum the perfect candidate? No, but you will never find one, but Santorum is a more viable candidate than Mitt Romney or Ron Paul and probably Gingrich. Santorum has more integrity than the rest of the field, and is not necessarily a big spender, and in fact helped navigate the welfare reform bill through the Senate in 1996, which significantly reduced welfare benefits, and welfare eligibility – definitely a good thing. Just be cause he voted for increasing the national debt does not make him an unacceptable candidate. The economy was not quite as visibly in deep trouble, and there is little doubt that Santorum is not aware of our present dire straits, and more than others, he has the integrity to make the right decisions. He has no doubt learned more than likely learned from his past mistakes. You can not pin the label flip flopper on him. He is as pro life as one can be, and when you really get down to the nitty gritty, there is no middle ground in that arena. in addition, you will not see Santorum sell out Israel.

      Report Post »  
    • dutchy
      Posted on January 8, 2012 at 11:20am

      Santorum is my choice!

      Report Post »  
    • Jefferson
      Posted on January 8, 2012 at 8:23pm

      Picture of Ron Paul and Rand when he was little.
      http://i.imgur.com/2JMhp.jpg

      I’m so proud to support this man. I hope that America wakes up in time to realize what is going on.
      Here is one of my brothers, telling it like it is.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0LxI7_v9vA&feature=youtu.be

      Report Post »  
    • Byzantine_Catholic
      Posted on January 8, 2012 at 9:12pm

      “One of the criticisms I make is to what I refer to as more of a Libertarian-ish right. They have this idea that people should be left alone, be able to do whatever they want to do, government should keep our taxes down and keep our regulations low, that we shouldn’t get involved in the bedroom, we shouldn’t get involved in cultural issues. That is not how traditional conservatives view the world.” — Rick Santorum

      Report Post » Byzantine_Catholic  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 9, 2012 at 9:11am

      “The public mind is not owned by us. It is owned and managed by the state itself and for a precise purpose: to perpetuate the idea that we have all chosen the regime that rules us. That is why there is so little difference between the political parties. As Higgs puts it, the U.S. has “two revolving factions of a one-party state farcically masquerade as authentic alternatives, the one specializing in crushing economic freedom and the other concentrating on crushing every other form of freedom.”
      Robert Higgs’ amazing work “Against Leviathan”

      Report Post »  
    • Ryan Helms
      Posted on January 9, 2012 at 12:00pm

      You are the reason these idiots return to office and we will never have good change. Go back in your hole good ol’ boy!

      Report Post »  
    • Texas Chris
      Posted on January 9, 2012 at 1:47pm

      So it’s “anyone but Obama… except Paul.”

      Why are people so afraid to be free? Allegory of the cave, anyone?

      Report Post »  
  • joan k
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:25pm

    Vote RON PAUL the REAL Anti-Establishment Candidate who the progressives on the Republican side are doing all they can to take them down.

    Report Post » joan k  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:38pm

      Progressives on BOTH sides are trying to take Ron Paul down because they fear the CONSTITUTION!

      Report Post »  
    • Mr. Oshawott
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:17pm

      That has got to be the BEST Ron Paul ad that I have ever seen. With Rick Santorum’s lengthy history of corruption and his seriously atrocious voting record out for everyone to see, it won‘t be too long before Rick’s campaign ends up crashing and burning. Out of all the presidential candidates running, only Ron Paul has maintained a voting record that has aligned with the Constitution during his three decades in Congress. Ron Paul 2012.

      Report Post » Mr. Oshawott  
    • ShyLow
      Posted on January 8, 2012 at 10:54pm

      Slick Rick on the Tea Party.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3TVoVqvt74

      Report Post » ShyLow  
  • Vechorik
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:22pm

    Honesty and Compassion
    http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-washington-dc/checkmate-video

    The post someone made beneath the video:
    “Robert J. Fürterer · Subscribe
    I never forget about this awesome doctor in 1984 during I was senior in high school when my ex-wife was junior that hospital would not take new patient w medicaid so he was told about us so he was willing to take it, delivered my daughter and pick the tab and told us to stay in school and finish in which we did. I got award and scholar from him during my graduation day. I went to college w the scholar of my major as electronic technology level 1 and 2. I thanked him for taking care of problem. He s my man w/ my heart. Go Dr. Ron Paul 2012 Go:)”

    Report Post »  
    • WD0331
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:26pm

      Ron Paul 2012!

      Report Post » WD0331  
    • rolle
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:43pm

      I have heard many stories just like yours. Dr. Paul used to give free medical care to the needy. It is really unfortunate that the media puts so much effort in trying to disgrace such a great man.

      Report Post »  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:49pm

      People do good things everyday.Should they be president? Should they get the front page in the newspaper? Maybe but they don’t. It is called being human. And Paul isn’t alone on an island by himself when it comes to being kind.

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 9, 2012 at 9:14am

      REPUBLICORP didn’t view the video — It was (supposedly racist) Ron Paul giving free medical service to an inter-racial couple in the early 70′s in TX and the black man saying how kind and honest Ron Paul is.

      Report Post »  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:22pm

    Yea we know Ron, everyone’s a commie except you.

    Report Post » Gonzo  
    • Pigpen
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:38pm

      Yeah, we know GONZO. There is no such thing as commies in America. If you believe that commies exist in the US Government then you are a “nut” who believes in Bigfoot, UFOs, the Loch Ness monster, and probably believes that the US President’s middle name is “Hussein” …oh, hey, wait a second…

      Report Post » Pigpen  
    • justangry
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:06pm

      @Gonzo So you’re disputing the add? I‘ll listen if something if there’s something in there you believe is inaccurate.

      Report Post » justangry  
    • ScratInTheHat
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:05pm

      I can’t believe that Blaze is letting their comments get filled up with this RP crap. I like RP’s views but this stuff is turning me off. This video is completely misleading! Go after Romney you morons! He is the biggest danger to the GOP right now!

      Report Post » ScratInTheHat  
    • ScratInTheHat
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:08pm

      @JUSTANGRY Santorum is getting a bad rap on many of these votes. That right to work bill was never going to make it it didn’t have the votes. That is why the cloture vote had only 38 of the 53 GOP senators voting for cloture. They had just won the senate and only had 53 GOP including those RINOs they always have up north. They shelved that right to work bill because it would have been filibustered from then until they got a 60 vote majority. It was a waste of time.

      Report Post » ScratInTheHat  
    • justangry
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:34pm

      @scratinthehat Fair enough.

      Report Post » justangry  
  • NOBALONEY
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:20pm

    zzzzzzzzz

    Report Post » NOBALONEY  
  • hauschild
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:19pm

    The thing you have to keep in mind about Santorum – as nice as he appears to be – is that he is a career politician. And, we all ought to be well versed on the damage and destruction career politicians have wreaked on this country.

    Look, I have no horse in this race – I think all our candidates are basically crap. I’m simply not willing to grasp at straws to out a Marxist. When did we become such candy asses when it comes to politics? Where’s the fight to get the “real” candidates into the race? We all desperately want change, and then all get real quiet when those left standing are all career politicians, and we take our medicine. Good Lord, you talk about obtuse – it’s astounding.

    Newsflash – Obama is an absolute joke, and the next person to succeed him might not be much better. Oh, on the surface he’ll appear to be vastly different. However, there will be no change in 2012. Bank on it.

    Report Post »  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:57pm

      hauschild
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:19pm
      The thing you have to keep in mind about Santorum – as nice as he appears to be – is that he is a career politician. And, we all ought to be well versed on the damage and destruction career politicians have wreaked on this country.
      **********************************************************************************************************

      So Paul‘s 11 terms in 23yrs doesn’t make him a “career politician? Your so full of it!
      And Paul is not even a very sucessful one either.

      Paul, who has served 11 terms in three different stages dating back to 1976, didn’t get a single law passed until 2009, when he authored a bill that allowed for the sale of a customs house in Galveston, Texas. Failure is often the norm in Congress, where only 4 percent of proposed bills get a President’s signature, but Paul’s approach to lawmaking is particularly suited to not getting things done.

      Of the 620 bills sponsored by Ron Paul during his long career in the House of Representatives, only four have ever made it to a vote on the House floor and only one of those became an actual law. An analysis by The Washington Post shows that Paul’s success rate of 0.2 percent falls far below that of most legislators, as Paul has chosen to stand up for his personal crusades, rather that build coalitions for more popular, but less ambitious, proposals.
      http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/12/ron-pauls-long-record-glorious-failures-congress

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:04pm

      website cutoff my link, try this one…………….

      http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/12/ron-pauls-long-record-glorious-failures-congress/46661/

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • hauschild
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:04pm

      Check out this phrase from my initial post …

      “Look, I have no horse in this race”

      Report Post »  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:11pm

      @hauschild

      I apologize. I read the first paragraph in your post and went into react mode. After I posted I read the rest. Sorry! I have been scolding Paulistinians so much lately that I got carried away.

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:28pm

      @Rational Man,

      “Paul, who has served 11 terms in three different stages dating back to 1976, didn’t get a single law passed until 2009 …”

      I’ll say it again: Ron Paul’s vote has exactly the same weight as everyone else in Congress.

      The fact that most of Congress ignored our Constitution doesn’t make Ron Paul the failure.

      Your argument, here, is therefore moot.

      Report Post »  
    • Doctor Nordo
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:35pm

      “Paul’s success rate of 0.2 percent falls far below that of most legislators, as Paul has chosen to stand up for his personal crusades, rather that build coalitions for more popular, but less ambitious, proposals.”

      In my opinion that is exactly why Paul should NOT be labeled as a career politician. He easily could have have advanced his career by going along with the establishment, but instead he was willing to risk stagnating his career by no compromising on his beliefs.

      As far as I see it, a career politician will do and say anything to get re-elected. This simply cannot be used to describe Dr. Paul.

      Report Post » Doctor Nordo  
    • Babeuf
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:49pm

      “I’ll say it again: Ron Paul’s vote has exactly the same weight as everyone else in Congress.”

      You are right, Ron Paul took an oath to execute his duties as a member of the House of Representatives, yet he failed to show up to vote against the NDAA, a bill he supposedly opposes. He didn’t bother to take a few hours out of his day to vote against something he considers dangerous to American rights and freedom. Instead, he decided to ignore his congressional responsibilities in order to remain on the campaign trail. You’d think a self-proclaimed libertarian would do his job when bills as important as the NDAA come up?

      FINAL VOTE RESULTS

      http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2011/roll932.xml

      Report Post » Babeuf  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:51pm

      @Doctor Nordo

      Sure! Redefine everything to try to shine a good light on Paul while you bash others for the same thing. How Paulistinian of you…………………

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • KidCharlemagne
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:19pm

      Rational Man
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:57pm

      but Paul’s approach to lawmaking is particularly suited to not getting things done.
      =======================================

      That’s wonderful though!:

      “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.
      -James Madison, Federalist #45, January 26, 1788″

      Only liberals like Rational Man want more federal laws passed…..

      Report Post »  
    • spankadonkey
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:45pm

      DOCDO – That is about the most laughable rationalization for FRAUD Paul’s failed political career I have ever seen one of you Paulbutz . Paul is simply a FRAUD. He complains and complains but has never taken any action to accomplish anything. Yet you twist his failure into something remarkable. Your post was good for the laugh of the day. Ron FRAUD Paul – what a guy.

      Report Post »  
    • spankadonkey
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:49pm

      DOCDO – Yep Paul does not pander to get re-elected. He buys his re-elections with pork. Ron FRAUD Paul – what a guy.

      Report Post »  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:00pm

      While Ron Paul was not busy being a Career Politician, he was sloughing off becoming a
      Doctor of Medicine getting his degree from Duke University’s School of Medicine, then doing his
      medical internship at the Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, after that he
      served as a flight surgeon in the United States Air Force and then
      in the United States Air National Guard. In his spare time he became a
      obstetrics and gynecology, and then began his own private practice delivering over 4000 babies.

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
    • Doctor Nordo
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 11:20pm

      RATIONALMAN (ironic name, it seems)

      What part of “IN MY OPINION” don’t you understand? That’s not redefining anything. I’m simply stating my opinion.

      Moron.

      Report Post » Doctor Nordo  
    • doyley64
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 11:48pm

      @Rational Man

      so you think that a politician is successful by how many laws he gets past?
      I have always thought the more laws that politicians pass are just more of my Freedoms and liberties they are taking away. Your way of thinking is just, uhh Irrational!

      Maybe you should change your screen name to Irrational Man.

      Report Post »  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on January 8, 2012 at 2:18am

      @doyley64

      So how do YOU rationalize your statement, “I have always thought the more laws that politicians pass are just more of my Freedoms and liberties they are taking away.”, when Paul tried to get congress to pay attention to the 620 bills he authored???

      “Your way of thinking is just, uhh Irrational!”………………………

      ROTFL………………..

      Report Post » Rational Man  
  • Vechorik
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:19pm

    Vote for Ron Paul if you care about the 2nd amendment and want to keep your guns!

    2012 Presidential Candidates – Gun Owners Of America
    http://gunowners.org/2012presidential.htm

    Ron Paul A+
    Rick Santorum B-
    Newt Gingrich C
    Mitt Romney D-

    Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:20pm

      Instead of coming clean and answering his National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Survey . . .

      . . . Rick Santorum is attacking Ron Paul, who answered his survey 100% in favor of our Second Amendment rights and has a stellar pro-gun record in the House, unlike Mr. Santorum.

      Please call Rick Santorum and let him know that you expect him to apologize for his past votes in support of gun control and promise to never do it again by returning his National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Survey — at once.

      Make your call right now:

      His Iowa office: 515-421-7224
      His South Carolina office: 855-206-7425
      His New Hampshire office: 603-518-5199

      Report Post »  
    • Babeuf
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:17pm

      Gingrich has an A rating with the NRA and unequivocally supports gun rights and has a long track record to prove it. He has spoken at the NRA to members about protecting responsible gun owner’s rights and gave a brief history of exactly why gun rights are so essential.

      http://youtu.be/_aMNzrPovu8

      Report Post » Babeuf  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:28pm

      The NRA is NOT a conservative group! Didn’t you know that? If you’re a member of the NRA, get out quick!

      Google NRA is NOT conservative and check out this one

      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2740941/posts

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:31pm

      BTW AARP is not conservative either. If you’re a true conservative, you’d get out and join one of the conservative alternatives that offers the same benefits, insurance plans, etc.

      Report Post »  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:08pm

      Vechorik
      True Conservatives already know this.

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
  • TRONINTHEMORNING
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:18pm

    Yeeeeeeep, Doc Paul is up to the old nasty ad game again. He won’t be the nominee. But Santorum had better get it together quick if he is to beat the flip-flopping flip-flopper, Romney. Anything can happen and I can’t wait for the debate tonite!

    Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:26pm

      What about the media’s nasty game of trying to wipe out Dr. Paul?

      I hope Americans will research truth and not just believe whatever the media tosses at them.

      Report Post »  
    • WD0331
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:29pm

      If the truth, in your mind is “nasty” then I guess you and your show are completely full of manure!

      Report Post » WD0331  
    • TRONINTHEMORNING
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:34pm

      Now come on, my show is music, memories, conservative opinion and awesome guests like INGRAHAM, DAVID LIMBAUGH, MALKIN, CHRIS WALLACE, even GERALDO! LEVIN joins me later this month with his book “AMERITOPIA”….Don’t miss it! Oh, and we adore the Constitution and support our troops. I welcome you all! Even Ron Paul!

      Report Post »  
    • hauschild
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:39pm

      Romney is going to be the nominee. Deep down inside, we all know it and sadly, I think the majority always wanted it because we’re running scared and not thinking clearly.

      Report Post »  
    • escape_from_socialism
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:56pm

      Yeah, what about all this self proclaimed conservatives, smashing Ron Paul every time they on radio. I’m talking about Glenn with his two punks, Rush, Sean, Mark Levin, Savage, even today Monica Crowly.
      I say good. Fight back.
      And one more thing, Santorum and Romney with out Ron Paul supporters are UNELECTABLE !!!

      Report Post »  
    • TRONINTHEMORNING
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:41pm

      Ok, all the candidates are wealthy, all are limelight seekers, and all must not mind too terribly much; getting the heck beat out of ‘em. So, we gotta pick the one who is closest to our views and seemingly best to get the ‘obama’ out of our system. Who can reverse course; who will reverse course? That’s a core checklist for me.

      Report Post »  
  • oddball130
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:18pm

    Ron Paul people sure are similar to the far left Progressive fanatics.

    Report Post » oddball130  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:34pm

      Like how?

      Report Post »  
    • mrsalvage2
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:37pm

      ODBALL is an Alinskyite

      Report Post » mrsalvage2  
    • oddball130
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:59pm

      Well, simply put, if they disagree with you they dont debate it, they attack you. Mind you , I am painting with a some what broad brush. I agree with alot of his Constitutional views, but his foreign policy views are naive.

      Report Post » oddball130  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:22pm

      Naive in what way?

      Saving money?
      Saving lives?
      Bringing troops home?
      Closing the borders?
      Cutting foreign aid to ALL — THEN deciding what’s done
      Supporting Israel as one of America’s best friends (but not however Beck wants — but has never said)
      on and on…..

      Report Post »  
    • Roaran
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:26pm

      There’s people like that everywhere.

      By the way, If you agree with his views on the constitution, how can you support views that are unconstitutional!?

      We can go to war with Iran if you people really want to. Just declare it. The problem is, the declaration will be, “We went to war with Iran so we could stop them from getting nuclear weapon, then we are going to implant democracy, then we are going to operate a police state and keep the people safe for 10+ years.”

      That is how absurd the Progressive right foreign policy is.

      Report Post »  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:21pm

      Vechorik
      Oddball is a typical Paul hater. He tells everyone that Paulists are nasty name callers and never debate the issues. You have to be kidding me. Oddball only know what Rush, Sean, “nnelG” and little mark tells him When called out on what issuses he had nothing to say. We a the few here that do debate the issues, just look at all the homework the Paulist do. We have debunked all the Anti-Paul stories here. I have personally emailed “The ezalB” about stories being miss reported, to no avail. This is one the reason Paulist are hated so, we do our homework, know the issues, and can defend our views (which in it’s self is kinda cheating, defending Liberty and Freedom is really quite easy) and we believe in our Candidate.

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
  • bpodlesnik
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:18pm

    Why he realesed a comercial attacking Santurom, instead of lets say, Barrack Obama who is President of The U.S.A, and far more corrupt then Rick, is way beyond me. This whole attacking other people in the GOP is really getting old, and uneffective.

    Report Post » bpodlesnik  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:21pm

      uh ….. like because someone must win the NOMINATION first? …. Duh

      Report Post »  
    • A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:34pm

      You mean something like this?

      Ron Paul explains his opposition to the NDAA 12/19/11
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8bbuMQLlqs

      Report Post »  
    • justangry
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:29pm

      Thanks for the link, Doc. This legislation, the lack of any real media coverage and the overwhelming bipartisan support for it, was the last straw for me. If any of the other candidates would come out against it, I’d consider voting for the lesser to two evils again, but I’ve had enough. I really wish they’d listen, but no one will openly support it and their candidates won’t repudiate it. They simply move on and ignore it as if it doesn’t exist. I don’t know what makes me angrier their apathy towards it, or their deflection tactics of calling us crazy.

      Report Post » justangry  
  • Pigpen
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:12pm

    Rick Santorum conspired with the Iowa Republican Evangelicals to “Beat Romney” to insure that only a “Christian” is nominated. Well, when did Catholics become “Christians” in the Evangelical playbook? Yes, Rick Santorum is a Roman Catholic and he CONSPIRED with the same Evangelicals who promoted the hopeless Huckabee only, ONLY to beat the “non-Christian” Romney! Any of you history buffs out there remember how JFK was treated by the Evangelical Community? But Ron Paul is called “dirty” by the MORMON Glenn Beck’s website? WTF?

    Report Post » Pigpen  
  • mathews2113
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:12pm

    find a better candidate and all vote for him. ron paul is no leader. if he was a leader he would have more people on his side other then those paul bots followers.

    Report Post » mathews2113  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:14pm

      Watch the primaries and you’ll see plenty of Ron Paul supporters.
      I’m 60 — a supporter — and resent the slur “Paubot” thank you very much.

      Report Post »  
    • NHwinter
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:17pm

      I‘m so sick of Paul’s nasty, nasty attacks. Hes a strange little man and I hope he gets clobbered. Paul has a lot of things in his closet that make me question who he really is.

      Report Post » NHwinter  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:22pm

      Like this?

      Ron Paul, the most conservative since 1937!

      http://www.voteview.com/is_john_kerry_a_liberal.htm

      Report Post »  
    • mrsalvage2
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:46pm

      Leadership is not counted by numbers.

      8made it on to the Ark.

      1/3rd followed Moses into the Dessert.

      Democracies all fail because of insane majorities, which is why America was a Republic once upon a time long ago.

      2% rose up against the King of England to found America, 4435 were killed.

      75% of the Human Population has an IQ od 100 or less.

      Recent Fox news Articel about a FL Professors qestion to his trudents showed 80% expect the Federal Government to take care of them and assure their success. Only 10% wanted the governemtn out of their way to be free.

      The Majority cried out CRUCIFY HIM! CRUCIFY HIM! on Good Friday Morning.

      Get REAL!

      Report Post » mrsalvage2  
    • CatB
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:23pm

      @NHWINTER .. I agree and the attacks by his supporters are in most cases personal and vile. I don’t understand how they think they will convince anyone that Paul is “the one” with such an attitude. Have you watched Paul when other people are talking during the debates? .. he makes faces and has a nasty little attitude the whole time.

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:17pm

      Paul came in third in Iowa, losing just by 3%. He is in second place now in NH, with 24%. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/5/santorum-gets-big-bounce-new-hampshire/ And is within top three in SC. Why in the world would any candidate drop out if they’re in those rankings? Now, Newt was nowhere near the votes as the top three in Iowa. Santorum is way behind in NH. I think it’s the MSM who is spreading these lies about Paul being non-electable. Let’s face it. Any candidate up there has a legitimate shot at beating Obama.

      I’ll do my best to nominate the most Constitutional and small Government candidate up there. The one other thing to consider is that Paul, along with Romney, are the only ones who’s support has not spiked up or down. Paul has a steady support, and is slowly but surely rising. IMO, it might come down to Paul and Romney.

      Watch the MSM in action. They’re liars: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHMJ2J8Ra3U

      According to exit polling Ron Paul was…

      #1 with independents
      #1 with strong conservatives
      #2 with evangelicals

      Report Post »  
  • Vechorik
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:11pm

    Polls show that Santorum is seeing a last-minute surge in Iowa, but pro-lifers and pro-Christian groups are seeing red.

    According to press reports, critics of Santorum have been handing out flyers and putting them on cars outside of Santorum events claiming that the former Pennsylvania Senator is a “Pro-Life Fraud.“ The organization publishing the flyers identifies itself as ”Iowans for Life.”

    A devout Catholic, Santorum has been a consistent advocate for pro-life issues, but in key political moves that could have benefited his own career, Santorum backed pro-abortion candidates.

    The pro-life flyer notes that Santorum has “a long and storied history of campaigning for radical pro-abortion candidates,” mentioning Santorum’s strong endorsement for former New Jersey governor Christine Todd Whitman and former fellow Pennsylvania senator Arlen Specter.

    Report Post »  
    • NHwinter
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:21pm

      Even the Catholic Church says if you can’t find a perfect candidate, vote for one who has the most positive attributes. I’m sure Santorum was doing exactly that. We have got to stop finding fault with everyone of these candidates. Any one of them would be better than Obama, except Paul. Paul is blind to the reality that America actually has foreigh enemies.

      Report Post » NHwinter  
    • hauschild
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:54pm

      @NHwinter

      Why is the buzz phrase now that we can’t be picky about who we support? If I had a dime for every lame brain that’s stated that, I’d have some serious coin.

      I don’t want to know that “my side” is not being picky the next POTUS. Yeah, I’m a real stickler when it comes to the leader of the free world.

      Let‘s not regurgitate talking points from RINO’s.

      Report Post »  
    • A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:21pm

      @NHwinter,

      “Paul is blind to the reality that America actually has foreigh enemies.”

      No, he is NOT blind to that reality.

      See here.

      Ron Paul Predicted 9/11 a Decade Ago!!!!!!!!!!!!
      http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hJTisovvjc

      And here.

      Ron Paul on “Letters of Marque and Reprisal”
      http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSP9NteApqI

      And here.

      How Ron Paul Would Defend America
      http ://video.foxbusiness.com/v/1341058115001/

      And here.

      SA@The DC – Ron Paul’s Reaganesque Foreign Policy
      http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjwaExW6-Fg

      Report Post »  
  • EqualJustice
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:10pm

    Ron Paul playing LIBERAL politics? hahahaha He and Huntsman are so out of this race.

    Report Post » EqualJustice  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:16pm

      What are you talking about?
      Ron Paul is the most conservative candidate in the race!
      He’s the most conservative representative since 1937! Why didn’t you know that?

      “Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected
      once its realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.” – Ron Paul

      His crystal ball is always very accurate!
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

      Report Post »  
    • pamela kay
      Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:48am

      Paul scares the heck out of me. I pray that he does not get the nomination. I am 61 and he does not impress me in the least and I believe he is far to weak on foreign policy and his 9/11 comments really ticked me off. He is like Mr. Rogers with a split personality.

      Report Post » pamela kay  
  • Vechorik
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:09pm

    Rick Santorum has family values except when it is a family he is friends with and is trying to protect from a scandal. He unethically protected a fellow Senator who cheated on his wife.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7N6Gd…ayer_embedded#!

    —————-
    Early in the George W. Bush administration, along with Dick Armey, Tom DeLay, and Grover Norquist, Santorum was at the center of the Republicans’ tactic of pressuring lobbying firms to hire only Republicans. At regularly scheduled once-weekly meetings held since Republicans took Congress and in 1994, Santorum and other leading Republicans were provided with a list of job openings at lobbying companies, and literally told the lobbyists who to hire — always well-connected Republicans. It was called the “K Street Project” because most lobbying firms have offices on Washington’s K Street, but the system backfired when the lobbyists’ “freeze-out” of Democrats became so successful that all the legislators on the take from crooked lobbyist Jack Abramoff were Republicans. When the arrangement was first reported in 2006, Santorum denied it was true and claimed to not even know Abramoff. When it was proven that Abramoff had been involved, Santorum announced that the “K Street” meetings had been ended. Months later it was reported that the meetings between lobbyists and Republicans were still being held at the same time, place, and day, once weekly. In 2006, the non-partisan Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Wa

    Report Post »  
  • JustPeachy
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:09pm

    Just the same old same old: politics as usual.

    Told ya Ron Paul is “just another politician.”

    Of COURSE he “approves this message.”

    Just another politician.

    SIGH.

    I‘m hoping Santorum doesn’t resort to such tactics, but I’m not holding my breath. . . Gingrich is attacking Romney. . Paul is attacking Santorum. . . and the games continue.

    While America burns to the ground.

    Shame on them ALL.

    Report Post » JustPeachy  
  • Vechorik
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:08pm

    Why Rick Santorum’s Pennsylvania Residency Scam and School Tuition Fraud Still Matters – And Why He Can’t Be the Nominee Because of It

    http://hillbuzz.org/why-rick-santorums-pennsylvania-residency-scam-and-school-tuition-fraud-still-matters-and-why-he-cant-be-the-nominee-because-of-it-95754

    Report Post »  
  • Vechorik
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:07pm

    Rick Santorum–attention to his tenure in Congress, including ethics questions that dogged him about a preferred mortgage he received from a bank run by campaign donors, and federal funds that went to a real estate developer who backed his charity.

    One of the top donors to Santorum’s charity was also the beneficiary of an $8 million Santorum-sponsored federal earmark, according to published reports. Melanie Sloan, a former federal prosecutor who filed an ethics complaint against Santorum in 2006 on behalf of a watchdog group, said her organization’s website received a tidal wave of visitors in the past 24 hours, and in an interview she said she believes people will discover that the GOP presidential contender is “hardly the moral paragon he purports to be.”

    http://news.yahoo.com/santorum-surge…152702229.html

    Report Post »  
    • NHwinter
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:29pm

      Oh my gosh, enough! All candidates have a list of undesirable things they have done, including your beloved Paul. Quite taking up so much space with your laundry lists.

      Report Post » NHwinter  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:59pm

      Well some said the ad wasn’t true — just giving background info.

      Report Post »  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on January 8, 2012 at 9:21am

      VECHORIK, your website post for Santorum’s mortgage problem is inaccurate, but the other posts are accurate and true. Santorum had more than one opportunity to admit and/or correct his fraud on Pennsylvania taxpayers , and instead of admitting and fessing up, he lied about it and got caught again. Along with his miserable non-conservative voting record, it definitely appears he is not Presidential timber, whether you are trying to turn the country around or not. He will be eaten alive by the lame stream media and deservedly so.

      Still don’t have a viable candidate, as Ron Paul still has some significant issues, many of which come from his foreign policy and his stance towards Israel.

      We still may need someone else to reconsider and jump in – Sarah Palin would be a definite posibility. She has the integrity, is not a Washington insider, and is not afraid to buck the system nor the elitists, one world government types. Nor does she have issues or baggage.

      Ps. She could eat Obama’s lunch in a debate, along with his breakfast and dinner.

      Report Post »  
  • msbs05
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:07pm

    Paul made calls & ran ads saying Santorum was pro-choice and not conservative in Iowa. It didn’t hurt Santorum there, because the attacks are absurd. I doubt anyone in SC will be listening to Paul’s lies either. Really sad. Make points on issues, but dont make up stuff against a fellow republican just to win. It shows lack of character.

    Report Post »  
    • TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:45pm

      Ron Paul is “disgusting.” I agree with Santorum.

      Report Post » TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12  
    • CatB
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:50pm

      I agree!

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:10pm

      “disgusting” is nothing but a personal attack — how about some facts?

      I can say Santorum is disgusting. What does that prove? Nothing.

      Report Post »  
    • NotAsheeple
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:10pm

      Made things up…..You don’t like the TRUTH… Vote for a Elite/Party/Progressive then. Santorum is another Lying Slick Willie

      Report Post » NotAsheeple  
  • Vechorik
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:06pm

    Perry’s ad against Santorum

    “unelectable”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt6XCZz2X1Y

    Report Post »  
  • circleDwagons
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:04pm

    Great ad. Mr.Paul!!! if it’s the Truth it is not an attack. Let the Truth set you free.

    Report Post » circleDwagons  
  • V-MAN MACE
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:04pm

    Ron Paul has the best, most hard hitting and accurate ads.

    Ron Paul 2012.

    Report Post » V-MAN MACE  
  • TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:02pm

    Who is the most negative candidate in the 2012 election race for Republicans? Ron Paul is the dirtiest and most negative campaigner in the 2012 Republican race for president.

    Ron Paul has gone negative since day one. He has lied. He has smeared. He has distorted. Ron Paul has so much dirt in his past, he’s hoping the dirt he throws will distract everyone from his dirt.

    Report Post » TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:03pm

      What did Ron Paul lie about?

      Nothing I saw.

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:05pm

      Catchy screen name you chose. You don’t have an agenda, do you?

      Report Post »  
    • V-MAN MACE
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:05pm

      How much dirt does Ron Paul have in his past?

      Please don’t mention anything from anonymous callers, anonymous newsletters, anonymous nothing.

      I want something tangible.

      Anything?

      Report Post » V-MAN MACE  
    • circleDwagons
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:06pm

      what lies? stating facts lies? Where/ what is santories plan to cut government?

      Report Post » circleDwagons  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:06pm

      Rick Santorum: Top-tier on Most Corrupt Member of Congress list 2 years running

      http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-washington-dc/rick-santorum-top-tier-on-most-corrupt-member-of-congress-list-2-years-running

      Report Post »  
    • mrsalvage2
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:35pm

      HEY! Bring on the Dirt!

      We have handled all of the fabrications and machinations. Does anyone have any actual dirt?

      No. All they can do is close each of their interviews with the same questions about a 3rd party Run or the newsletter Articles and primers that he did not write.

      Now they want to pin him in as a Dove on Iran, which we are not lilly-white on, but everyone else seeks to use violence to control the wife after we already broke her cheek.

      Yeah, right.

      Get real!

      Report Post » mrsalvage2  
    • TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:41pm

      I remember just before the debate at the Reagan Library when the Paul campaign released a negative smear ad about Rick Perry blah-blah-blah. The ad showed Paul as a young Congressman Paul who “stood with Ronald Reagan” and this booming voice over… Blah-blah-blah. That was the start of the newest Ron Paul Revolution of BS and partial truth smear. Don’t waste my time with your Ron Paul spin.

      Paul “stood with Reagan”… what a crock of crap.

      Report Post » TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12  
    • escape_from_socialism
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:15pm

      TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
      you must be so happy with status quo, because either Santorum or Romney will stud up to UN, FED and rest of the globalists. Read some more, so maybe you will learn, people who stud up to the The Bank usually had “call” on them. Jackson, Lincoln, JFK.

      Report Post »  
    • TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:34pm

      @SOCIALISM. I‘ve been reading since the late 1950’s. How about you? I‘ve probably been voting longer than you’ve been alive and actually saw John F. Kennedy on his campaign trail. Most of you Paul followers are newbies to a lot of things, not just politics.

      Report Post » TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12  
    • V-MAN MACE
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:43pm

      This is coming from the attention-seeker who named himself “Time to end the Paul Campaign in 12”.

      Do you think you have an ounce of objectivity that anyone needs to care about? Stop deluding yourself. All of that haranguing and juvenile ad hominem attacks on Ron Paul and his supporters aren’t convincing anyone, what it’s doing is making you look like a desperate, frothing-at-the-mouth fool.

      What you’re more likely to cause is the opposite outcome of what you are trying to affect, people are likely to rebel against your heavyhandedness and manic-like pressure and vote for Ron Paul just to make you burst a blood vessel.

      Who are you voting for?

      Report Post » V-MAN MACE  
    • Fella
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:11pm

      No specifics. No facts. Just a bunch of worthless anecdotes from a guy that proports to be ~65 running around message boards spamming childish insults and slander. Ha! I love the comment section at theblaze!

      Report Post »  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:43pm

      Why is TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12 talking about JFK? I remember him as a Democrat. I thought there was something fishy about this guy. I Think he is from the left!

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
  • Maxim Crux
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:01pm

    Powerful add, but I doubt if it reflects hardly a fraction of the truth

    Report Post »  
  • Steelhead
    Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:00pm

    yee haw , republicans playing politics. lol

    Report Post » Steelhead  
1 2 3 ... 7

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love