Bill O‘Reilly Blasts Ron Paul’s Stance on Iran: ‘His Foreign Policy Disqualifies Him’
- Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:18am by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
There’s no doubt that Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul has his fans — and his foes.
It is the Texas congressman’s stances on international affairs and national security that often create angst or support (depending on individual opinions on the matter) among members of the electorate.
Paul‘s foreign policy views have led Fox News host Bill O’Reilly to claim that the presidential contender isn’t qualified to assume the American presidency. This morning, O‘Reilly appeared on NBC’s Today Show to chat about his new book “Killing Lincoln” and to share his take on the GOP field. When asked to comment on Paul, he held little back.
(Related: Rush Limbaugh Blasts Ron Paul for His Stance on Iran)
“His foreign policy disqualifies him in my eyes as an American — not as a journalist,” O’Reilly said. “I don’t think we need another Neville Chamberlain with Iran. So, he wants to be friends with Iran, that’s swell.”
Watch O’Reilly discuss Paul, among other candidates, below (his comments on Paul are at 4:19):
Arthur Neville Chamberlain, of course, was the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1937 until 1940. He was known for his appeasement in addressing foreign policy issues. BBC offers up a little of the history behind Champerlain’s appeasement:
Like many in Britain who had lived through World War One, Chamberlain was determined to avert another war. His policy of appeasement towards Adolf Hitler culminated in the Munich Agreement in which Britain and France accepted that the Czech region of the Sudetenland should be ceded to Germany.
Chamberlain left Munich believing that by appeasing Hitler he had assured ‘peace for our time’. However, in March 1939 Hitler annexed the rest of the Czech lands of Bohemia and Moravia, with Slovakia becoming a puppet state of Germany. Five months later in September 1939 Hitler’s forces invaded Poland. Chamberlain responded with a British declaration of war on Germany.
The comparison, though uttered with an appropriate tone and delivery, is certainly not a compliment.
(H/T: Mediaite)
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 694 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 662 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 525 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 364 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 348 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 232 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 242 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order Read More- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 232 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (491)
Clara88
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:57amNewt collapses in Iowa..Ron Paul out in front….according to poll
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/12/gingrich-collapses-iowa-ron-paul-surges-front/46360/
Report Post »AhLeahIris
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:03pmAnd so it begins: The Establishment will now crucify Ron Paul: http://wp.me/p1HGwx-1Kz
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:04pmWhen I see America crumbling because of finances and unconstitutional laws, Israel and Iran doesn’t even come to mind. America collapsing like the Soviet Union collapsed DOES!
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:11pmBlazers, THIS is Ron Paul explaining EXACTLY why economies crash!
Ron Paul’s Texas Straight Talk 12/19/11: European Bailout Will Make Crisis Far Worse
http://www.dailypaul.com/194353/ron-pauls-texas-straight-talk-12-19-11-european-bailout-will-make-crisis-far-worse
Ron Paul:
Report Post »“Until the correction takes place, there can be no recovery.”
Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:13pmExcellent article:
“U.S. leaders in both parties are proving themselves impotent and/or unwilling to stop the destruction of the U.S. economy they have engineered through their policies, they are likewise unable and/or unwilling — with the exception of Dr. Paul and a few others — to see that another set of failed policies, those in the foreign-policy realm, are leading to a greatly expanded war with Islam that will accelerate the collapse of the U.S. economy.”
On America’s horizon — A far larger war with the Muslim world
Report Post »http://non-intervention.com/1007/on-americas-horizon-a-far-larger-war-with-the-muslim-world/
Delta D-5-3
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:14pmRon Paul‘s foreign policy of appeasement towards Iran can very well be compared to the appeasement of Hitler by Arthur Neville Chamberlain who was the Prime Minister of Britain in the late 30’s. ABSOLUTELY, O’Reilly has it right there. I love MOST of what Paul stands for and that’s SMALL GOVERNMENT. But man, his views of the world, especially Iran and the Middle East in general should scare the hell out of every American. And that‘s why he’ll NEVER be President of the United States of America…………..
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:15pmI wish O’Reilly would let Dr. Paul speak (instead of interrupting and bullying) I’d like to hear them discuss this:
The CIA was responsible for creating Al Qaeda:
Al Qaeda was created by the CIA, in their offices in Washington D.C., According to Richard Clark in his most recent book. It was created for Saudi Arabia to bankroll Osama bin Laden, through the House of Saud, “in the Afghan war against the Soviet Union during the 1980′s and Riyadh and Washington together contributed an estimated $3.5 billion to the mujahideen.”
“In late 2003, U.S. News & World Report conducted an exhaustive study titled. ‘The Saudi Connection.’ Its findings included the following.”
“The evidence was indisputable: Saudi Arabia, America‘s longtime ally and the world’s largest oil producer, had somehow become, as a senior Treasury Department official put it, ‘the epicenter’ of terrorist financing’.
http://www.rense.com/general61/myths.htm
Let us not forget that it was Israel, which in fact created Hamas. According to Zeev Sternell, historian at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, “Israel thought that it was a smart ploy to push the Islamists against the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO)”.
http://globalresearch….
It’s really a tangled web we have woven for ourselves. And as long as we remain on their soil and dropping bombs on their civilians, we are providing all the motivation that is necessary for more Muslims to become radicalized. It
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:16pmIt just so happens that the message of Bachmann/Santorum/Romney/Gingrich have hit upon as the ticket to the White House is genocide.
Of course they don’t call it that. But if you posit that the fundamental beliefs of a billion people are fatal to your own culture, nation, and the lives of your children, what you are really saying is that they must be exterminated. And that is what most presidential candidates are saying. Muslims want to destroy us so we must destroy them. The demagogues may or may not actually believe what they are saying. I suspect they don’t believe much of anything. But it doesn’t matter because America is lining up to take part in the slaughter.
This is why the coming economic collapse is good news! They won’t have any money with which to wage their holy war of world destruction.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:19pmIf a person THINKS their neighbor wants to kill them — then they kill the neighbor FIRST — Who goes to jail?
Report Post »Warrior4Zion
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:19pmBill is right. We need a President that will protect Israel above all. We can’t allow another Holocaust. The Jews are God’s chosen people and America has got to bless Israel or we will fall. There’s no cost or sacrifice to great for our number one ally Israel. Fox News, Glenn Beck and talk radio are about the only Media out there today that truly understands our bond with Israel and the Jews.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:20pmEach star on this map represents a US military base. Iran is threatening the US?
I’d say the US is threatening Iran (and has been since the 1950s)
And you STILL don’t feel safe? Jeeeshhh — what does it take?
http://www.bluerepublican.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/US-bases-in-Middle-East.jpg
Report Post »chewfatlip
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:25pmOh jeez, now it’s another 4 years of barry.
Report Post »TheJoseyWhales
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:26pmReally Bill? Paul is disqualified because of his stance on Iran? Paul doesn’t want to be friends with Iran, he doesn’t want another war based on the same kinda intel that Bush had about Iraq and the“WMD”!
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:30pmA baseball team that never gets to bat can’t win no matter how well they play.
Report Post »No one wants to show predatory powers how well they can “take it.”
The Vietnam war could have been over before it started – with a week of demonstrated air power if someone other than Lyndon Johnson was President.
Paul said paraphrasing, “If we have to have a war, get to it, win, and bring the troops back home.”
There is another view that I have not seen Paul express. The reason we are in wars – in almost every case I can think of, is because the predators think we will not fight. The wars that happen are because they push too far and miscalculate what they can “get away with.” There were no wars beginning when either Eisenhower or Reagan were President because the predators KNEW we would respond.
If we minded our own business, as Dr. Paul suggests, and if we responded vigorously to a threat to our safety, we would be safer than we are now.
I think Bill O. has not thought this through.
Delta D-5-3
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:32pmVechorik your view on Iran matches Pauls. You obviously will NEVER see the threat that Iran poses, or are you typing from Iran and are hoping for a Paul win?? Thought so……….
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:33pmGlenn Beck agrees with O‘Reilly on Ron Paul’s foreign policy being “dangerous”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mj_H5di12wM#t=78s
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:33pmWarmonger O‘Reilly doesn’t determine who is disqualified for me. Not agreeing with neocon foreign policy doesn’t disqualify anyone, it actually elevates them.
Now a vote for the unconstitutional Patriot Act Extension disqualifies Michelle Bachmann from posing as a Tea Party member, but that’s just my opinion.
Bill O‘Reilly’s neoconservatism disqualifies him from judging Ron Paul’s electability. O‘Reilly praises Obama for continuing Bush’ Preemptive War Strategy under the weak veneer of Humanitarian Aid, then commences to carry his water and lambast anyone who doesn’t toe the neocon/liberal line.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:34pmPlease Name ONE ‘real world’ accomplishment that the last TWO presidents had? WtF did Bush Jr. ever do!? WtF did Obama ever do!? Nothing! Ron Paul HAS been warning since 1971. He HAS been voting NO to EVERY unconstitutional measure that congress has tried to pass. He fought to get an audit of the FED, and accomplished a partial audit.
Gringch – Chicken Hawk – studied in France to avoid the draft
Romney – Chicken Hawk – studied in Paris, lived like a king with maids and bulters, avoided the draft
Bachman – Chicken Hawk – was an adolescent – IRS TAX Lawyer – God knows we dont need Another lawyer in the WH.
Santorum – Chicken Hawk – was a kid as well – Lawyer that never served in the military, but promotes WAR.
PAUL – was DRAFTED and instead JOINED – buck private or officer? He served 5 years as flight surgeon officer in the Air Force – Delievered over 4000+ babies in the ‘private sector’ – tiredlessly fights to have sound money (gold standard) – Oathkeeper – consistent. Has LED the way on the discussion about the Federal Reserve. Has LED the way of the real TEA Party. He believes in God, the Constitution, NON-INTERVENTIONISM, and the free markets.
You people are putting, War with Iran in the name of ‘protecting’ Israel, before saving your own Country. I support Israel by restoring their soverignty and decisions. Will Israel be left high and dry when we collapse? What will you progressives do then? Is that your pla
Report Post »Mike N
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:37pmRon Paul is fit for a Cabinet position charged with castration or elimination of the Federal Reserve, but he woefully unqualified to be President.
Report Post »heavyduty
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:40pmI don’t know the straw poll I seen had Ron Paul dead last. So take it for what‘s it’s worth. People will decide who gets the nod.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:49pmCurious, I took a look at our enemies’ casualties since WWII. I just did web searches, so I‘m sure the numbers aren’t accurate, but it should be sufficient…
Vietnam – 1,100,000
Korean War – 132,000
Grenada – 78
Dessert Storm – 35,000
Aphganistan – 73,500
Iraq war – 654,965
Total – 2, 351,043 estimated enemy and civilian casualties. North Korean casualties weren’t available, nor the reprecussions in Cambodia and Laos.
Ron Paul is the only candidate who listens when our troops say, “They’re tired of this BS and want to come home” We’ve kicked enough butt for a while. I think we can take a break and fix ourselves.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:53pm*I support Israel’s soverignty and decisions. We MUST EMPOWER Israel to breathe/move on its own.*
I got an IDEA. Why dont you people who cling to this, Iran-Israel, issue just move to Israel? Do you want to protect them to the point where we collapse our own country!? Please move your as$ over there, become a citizen, join their Military, and defend them. Netanyahu said Israel “Does Not” need American help for defense. That Israel could handle a conflict on its own. Dont believe me?
Report Post »Watch 4 yourself: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-hypbVzYj8
This_Individual
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:54pmThey’re scared. Twisting Ron Paul’s words to mean isolationism is just straight out fear of individual citizens getting rid of the socialist disease which is becomming more obvious in both parties.
Report Post »Treaty
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:02pmPeople are asleep. According to a recent poll 50% of the American electorate can’t even name one Republican running for President. There are tons of Republicans, even here on the Blaze, that have no clue about what’s really going on. They just hate Obama. GinGrinch and Romney are a joke. Ron Paul is the right choice to get us back on the path our forefathers intended.
Report Post »texasfireguy
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:03pm@Justangry; So you are blaming every civillian casualty on us? Thats ridiculous, the vast majority of the “civillian” casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan are cause by AQ; IED’s, homicide bombers, etc. The reemainder of the “civillians” killed by US forces in both conflicts, are mostly insurgents in civillian clothes, an get counted by the liberal meida and other idiots as “civillians”.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:03pmO’Reilly said “Fox News prefers Rasmussen polls”
This site “Real Clear Politics” shows all polls.
Take a look at Dr. Paul’s current standing in Iowa.
You’ll see why Fox “prefers Rasmussen polls.’
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/ia/iowa_republican_presidential_primary-1588.html
Report Post »dimitrisokolov
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:08pmRon Paul’s foreign policy is the only one that makes sense. The constant meddling in the affairs of other countries and playing world policeman is exactly why we got 9/11. The US overthrew the democratically elected president of Iran in 1953 and installed the Shah to help us oppose the USSR. The Shah was horrendous and lead to the Islamic Revolution in 1979. The US supported Saddam. The US armed and supported the Taliban. The US supports the corrupt Saudis. The US supported Mubarak. The US is now assassinating Iranian scientists and sending in spy drones. If China or Russia was bombing the US and killing civilians and occupying the USA, how do you think Americans would react? We would fight tooth and nail to expel the invaders. According to US foreign policy, other countries are just supposed to get invaded & bombed and be happy we are liberating them. US foreign policy is bankrupting the country and only making more enemies. We have to stop the madness. The neocons are pushing for another war with Iran. How is Iran threatening the US? The US has invaded Iraq & Afghanistan, both Iran’s neighbors and has Iran surrounded. Look at this map of US bases in the region. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439×2456137 Who is threatening who? Republicans need to support Ron Paul’s foreign policy, instead of constant meddling and war.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:08pmReal Clear Politics has a sliding graph that can see candidates movements at a glance.
Try it — it’s eye-opening.
As voters get more information on Dr. Paul, he climbs! Currently leading.
Just as when the voters get more information about Gingrich, he falls.
Play with the chart/with the cursor/showing date FUN!
Report Post »http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/ia/iowa_republican_presidential_primary-1588.html
Ruler4You
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:13pmI don’t care what Ron Pauls reason is, in this case, I agree with O’Reilly.
Iran, technically, is at war with the U.S. already. Economic warfare is usually a function of traditional militaristic “kill and break” warfare.
In this case the LAST thing Iran wants is to have is the U.S. bombing infrastructure it requires to complete its nuclear ambitions. Thus, a “soft” war of economics is in full swing.
You don‘t think Iran’s “exercise” to close the straights of Hormuz is a purely academic drill, do you?
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:13pmBill O’Reilly more and more with each passing day exposes himself for the leftist moron that he is. So by all means O’Reilly, keep running your hog jowls and real Constitutional Patriots will rise up and turn the socialist Murdochs channel off.
First, arguing with Glenn Beck on history is laughable. Arguing that Gingrich is a conservative when anyone with a single brain cell knows that he’s the most progressive/communist candidate who claims to be a Republican.
Here‘s your word of the day O’Reilly, and you should take it to heart. IRRELEVANCE
Report Post »robbyjo
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:19pmI think that Ron Paul will start picking up steam in the next two month’s. If this story is all they have to discredit the Man. Well they better start packing because there in for a bumpy ride!!
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:21pmBill O is a joke and anyone listening to Bill O should be ashamed of themselves. Bill on a book tour on NBC, imagine that. Bill couldn’t even get his facts straight in his book, let alone on TV…
Bill O should have said he is for war with Iran. Billy is beating the drum for war like all progressives do as seen in Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Iran. Oddly, they never beat the drum to stop the war on our border with Mexico…
War equals more spending which equals more taxes. I wish some one would ask Billy O if Iran wanted to nuke us so bad why haven’t they bought one from the Russians and done so especially if both hate us….He wouldn‘t be able to answer because he wouldn’t be able to promote fear for war….
I will be voting Ron Paul in 2012…
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:24pm@ Ruler4You
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:13pm
I don’t care what Ron Pauls reason is, in this case, I agree with O’Reilly.
Iran, technically, is at war with the U.S. already. Economic warfare is usually a function of traditional militaristic “kill and break” warfare.
In this case the LAST thing Iran wants is to have is the U.S. bombing infrastructure it requires to complete its nuclear ambitions. Thus, a “soft” war of economics is in full swing.
You don‘t think Iran’s “exercise” to close the straights of Hormuz is a purely academic drill, do you?
——————————————————————————————————————————————–
Who gives a rats ass if Iran closes the Straight or Hormuz? And how do you come to the conclusion that we are “technically” or otherwise at war with Iran?
The ONLY reason Iran is acting the way they are is because the United States has tied Israel’s hands. Get out of Israel’s way and they would solve the Iranian and Palestinian problem in a matter of days.
Non interventionism is the ONLY path that makes sense for America. It also happens to be the only position that’s Constitutional.
Out of NATO
Out of the UN
Out of American Military Police actions
Close down every foreign military base
Stand on a foreign policy that actually makes Constitutional sense, and away from the war mongering idea’s of conquest that does nothing but harm Americ
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:26pm@ Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:21pm
Bill O is a joke and anyone listening to Bill O should be ashamed of themselves. Bill on a book tour on NBC, imagine that. Bill couldn’t even get his facts straight in his book, let alone on TV…
Bill O should have said he is for war with Iran. Billy is beating the drum for war like all progressives do as seen in Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Iran. Oddly, they never beat the drum to stop the war on our border with Mexico…
War equals more spending which equals more taxes. I wish some one would ask Billy O if Iran wanted to nuke us so bad why haven’t they bought one from the Russians and done so especially if both hate us….He wouldn‘t be able to answer because he wouldn’t be able to promote fear for war….
I will be voting Ron Paul in 2012…
Report Post »————————————————————–
Quoted for truth!
justangry
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:41pmI didn’t blame anyone.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:45pm**To Anyone who will actually Watch**
While Americans Shopped, The Constitution was shredded.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCRAEqzZhWI
Report Post »richard the lion-hearted
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:49pmAll of you who are Christians, those of you who believe that this is the beginning of the end times and follow the Holy Bible’s prophecies about the last days (original translation KJV, my source), take heed. .Zechariah 14:1-2
1) Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee.
2) For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city.
In my limited capacity to understand God’s will I approach the issue with common sense based on the real facts presented before me in this present time. The United (strike that, DIVIDED) States of America as an ally to Israel presently will accomplish the prophecy either by someone like Obama who says one thing and does the opposite, alienating and straining Israeli ties while propping up muslim nations and bowing to them and the U.N., at the same time putting down the America, or by someone like Ron Paul who will sever all ties with Israel as a kind of Battle cry for his ‘Independant’ stance. What voters with independant leanings fail to see as well is that Israel IS our ally now, here in real time. We have many years of diplomatic relations to help each other stay on top of being a beacon of freedom and democracy against tyranny and dictatorships the world over and undoing something overnight is nev
Report Post »escape_from_socialism
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:55pmO’Reilly lost his credibility long, long time ago. Now Rush on radio is pushing Bush. Thanks, but no thanks.
I’m voting for constitution. Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:03pmA simple picture clearly shows who the Progressives are and who stand with the Constitution. Intervention is Progressive as the Constitution is built upon Non-Intervention.
Total==============================================Anarchy
Gov ^
Constitution
^ ^
Intervention No-Intervention
Foreign Aid No foreign Aid
Domestic Welfare Self Reliance
World Government No World Government
Progressives Agenda
Fiscal policy-Government intervening in Fisical Domestic policy (welfare, central planning)
Foreign Policy-Government intervening in sovereign nation affairs and either backing dictators thru financial $’s or thru military action to implement such dictators we will then back with $’s.
Foreign Aid-Government worldly redistribution of wealth, bribery for dictators to do as we say.
World Gover
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:11pmIt appears by all accounts that the propaganda which has been spewed by the Media and in particularly FOX News, Glenn Beck, and the so called Conservative talk radio faction for the past 20 years is beginning to lose its effect upon the average American. I believe that the average American is beginning to see this interventionist policy coming from both sides of the aisle whether it’s in the case of Kosovo, Somalia, Iraq, Libya Iran, etc.. are all big diversionary schemes.
Oh how our Conservative friends railed against Bill Clinton over the Wars in Kosovo and Somalia.. They said we were not the Global Police force and that the Wars were unconstitutional but after Bush and crew deceived everyone through their trumped up intelligence and non-stop War propaganda from FOX News they were itching for a War in Iraq. An easy War. Where only the bad guys died and we would be greeted as Liberators is what the administration told us right?
Now after 100s of thousands of dead civilians across the Middle East, a world set on edge, Americans hated intensely from capital to capital across the Globe for our meddling and interventionist policies, 1.5 Trillion of our Treasure wasted, 10s of thousands of dead and maimed US soldiers our Neo-Cons don’t seem to hold as much sway do they? Only fools and naives fail to see the folly of their ways.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:12pm@richard the lion-hearted…. So your saying Christians, like myself, are against God because we want to vote for Ron Paul???? Please get it through your thick skull that NOT ALL relations with Israel will be cut. Only the foreign Aid aka ‘Money for being our friends.’ Dr. Paul NEVER, i repeat NEVER, said stop trading with Israel NOR did he say we wouldnt be their ally anymore. Your PARANOIA is completely farce. Its people like you whom think they should ‘dictate’ to Israel like youre God. FYI, youre not God and youre NOT Israel’s little dictator. EMPOWER them to make their own choices. Unshackle our Creators nation.
Report Post »smackdown33
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:14pmLet‘s remember who Bill O’Reilly really is, the man who gave us false information about Iraq as he propagandized America to go to war with Iraq. No different from the New York Times. Now, this contributor to the Jewish World Review has the balls to criticize anyone about foreign policy?
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:16pmCarol Paul “They do such terrible things…….truth will prevail.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=VT2dlXikuCY#t=27s
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:17pmO’ really and the progressives are walking on the fightin side of me….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VLhH2wCtAQ
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:22pmContinued from above
World Government-League of Nations (Wislon), United Nations based in New York.
Now look at Santorum, Bachmann, Newt, or Mitt as they all support parts of this progressive agenda whether they have the honesty to admit it or not.
Notice everything Progressives support is LEFT of the Constitution. Don’t be a LEFTY and vote Ron Paul!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:22pmLove the Merle Haggard …..
Here’s a Johnny Cash one I love!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pP3jCx6EdMI
Radio stations need to play these during the elections season!
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:31pm@vechorik… Totally Awesome! I <3 Merle Haggard and Johnny cash! and i couldnt agree with you more!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:32pmThis isn’t a well-known artist, but he wrote a Tea Party song that’s wonderful:
“Don’t call me us names” J. D. Flud
http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=9fGpysnPuaM
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:39pmHere’s another good song: “Landslide”
Hey, this blog is turning out to be fun!
Landslide http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DB3byb_G_JY
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:46pmTwo thumbs up for “Dont call us no names!”
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:57pmJust remember, if you support war with Iran, you are standing with John McCain and Lindsey Graham, both known Progressives and both sponsored the Defense Authorization Bill which allows the President to deem anyone a terrorist and hold them without trial forever. The same two who also supported Intervention in Libya and thought Obama didn’t go far enough in Libya.
When you find yourself aligned with known progressives you had better check the view you are holding and supporting cause something ain’t right. Progressives rarely if ever hold a Constitutional view as they are against the Constitution.
Something to be honest with yourself about.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 3:17pmOkie from Muskogee: Do you realize that we (mostly you and others) are educating Americans on these issues real time right before our very eyes. People are being informed and they are waking up by the droves. I believe that the average American is sick of the Neo-Con’s policies.
It just amazes me how people are going around the Media now to get their news.. That’s why I fear the so called “kill switch” in the cyber security bill. If they don’t shut down this internet and various blogs they will eventually lose power in America.
I certainly appreciate your persistence and others on this site.. I know that I’ve pretty much ruined my witness because of my view of the Jews but in the end what matters is getting the truth out. Although this is certainly not a reflection of America, we now routinely see Paul supporters out numbering others on the Blaze 5-10 to 1. They certainly can no longer say that we are the fringe. I for one voted for Huckabee during the last election and reluctantly McCain after he chose Palin. I did‘t even consider Paul during the last election but this time around he’s the only one that I will consider.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 4:00pm@Tech
Not to speak is to speak and I didn’t speak for a long time so I have a bunch to make up for.
Your witness is not ruined at all. Just remember presentation is everything.
What bothers me is so many run around saying “TEA” and then support candidates that will spend and tax them into oblivion. That is absolutely insane. I am an active TEA Party member and the TEA group I associate with believe the TEA movement has been hijacked.
TEA could never support Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, or Bachmann as they all are for foreign aid (world redistribution of wealth, spending) and intervention (military spending) which results in higher taxes on US citizens. No honest sane TEA Party member could support any of those. It is directly opposite of what TEA means!
So the TEA Party will decide if they are still a movement or just an insane thought in this next election. If we nominate another spend happy candidate, the TEA Party is officially hijacked and should be deemed insane.
Keep getting the word out about Ron Paul. We are the ones the NDAA bill was passed to silence. The ones standing for the Constituion are the ones they call terrorists. Terrorists to their world society.
Stay safe!
Report Post »Sagat
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 4:10pmAny noeconservative that supports provoking war with Iran is out of his mind. What do they possibly expect to happen that would be a benefit for America? Iran is a nation that is over TWICE THE SIZE OF TEXAS and it’s the 20th largest economy in the world (by purchasing power parity). A war with Iran would cripple our economy because it would disrupt the oil flow out of the Persian Gulf. Many nations, including Russia and China, have vital strategic and economic interests in Iran. We very well could provoke a large scale regional war.
Though we could win a war with Iran, why would it even be worth the costs, especially if we initiate it? We’d create enemies with 75 million Iranians, not to mention many others in the region. It would encourage more radicalism and the costs in blood and treasure would be tremendous. And for what? Because we think they might possibly create a nuclear weapon even though we have no definite proof that they have the capabilities or the goals of doing so? Who in their right mind thinks that’s a good idea?
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 4:12pmDelta, you just do not understand Pauls policy because you are listening to cronicapitalists like Bill O’Reilly. Instead of just giving the order himself to go to war, he would go to Congress, get a declaration of war, and with that he would go in with all our might, get the job done quickly and get out as fast as we went in with no nation builsing. He is not weak on this as the establishment says. If we continue to spend the money we do right now overseas, our economy WILL crash for sure and then what good are we to anyone? Please stop listening to all thes establishment shills.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 4:25pmHere is what O’Reilly is really like people. I know this is a while back, but people like him do not ever change. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbMoWt7i7Jc&feature=related
Now that is the type of person I want to listen to, not.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 4:26pm@richard the lion-hearted,
“The United (strike that, DIVIDED) States of America as an ally to Israel presently will accomplish the prophecy either by someone like Obama who says one thing and does the opposite, alienating and straining Israeli ties while propping up muslim nations and bowing to them and the U.N., at the same time putting down the America, or by someone like Ron Paul who will sever all ties with Israel as a kind of Battle cry for his ‘Independant’ stance.”
A Ron Paul presidency would actually be better for Israel, because we have been tying the hands of Israel for a long time. Our so-called “support” for Israel means that they have made themselves beholden to the US.
See here.
Open Letter to the Republican Jewish Coalition on Ron Paul
http://lewrockwell.com/block/block186.html
Also, consider that we are a republic, which means weren’t set up to have a national identity, but rather many localized republican governments.
See here.
Federalist Papers #10
http://constitution.org/fed/federa10.htm
“The influence of factious leaders may kindle a flame within their particular States, but will be unable to spread a general conflagration through the other States. A religious sect may degenerate into a political faction in a part of the Confederacy; but the variety of sects dispersed over the entire face of it must secure the national councils against any danger from that source.”
Report Post »Truthbeliever2
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 4:50pmI am not one of Ron Paul’s followers, but it is obvious that to anyone who pays attention that Ron Paul will never get a fair shake with any ANY media outlets. I have never seen a media personality give this guy a place to speak without demonizing him and his views. Demonizing to the point that he cant even get a word in edgewise. Bill O’reilly is not “looking out for you” He has an obvious vendetta against Ron Paul. Even Glenn cant see the good Ron Paul has to offer. When I see all the media treating one person this way it makes me think Ron Paul is the man for me. In my opinion, if the corrupt media outlets that spew pc lies and propaganda all day long dislike Ron Paul; he must be a pretty good guy. I’m leaning more and more towards Ron Paul every day.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 5:05pmWho really takes advice from O’Reilly? Since when is he the one that appoints a president.
Report Post »jackeric61
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 5:28pmI thought most of the people on the blaze had a good memory. I guess I was wrong. Remember Iraq and the wmds, nothing there. Remember North Korea building nukes? Still nothing there. Remember Egypt and their oppressive ruler? How’s that going? Please people use that brain God gave and use it, the threat from Iran is not there and even if it was do you think that other countries around them starting with Israel won’t stop it for their own protection? These morons in washington are nothing but warmongers and have no problem exterminating innocent people that have no choice about the actions of their gov’t. Ron Paul is our only hope for pease and prosperity
Report Post »TeaParty_RonPaul_R3VOLUTION
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 5:39pmRon Paul is the reason my whole family is going to vote for him. So are my friends family and he is a veteran!
btw, Bill is not a journalist.
Report Post »black9897
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 6:13pmshut up Billy boy.
Report Post »Anamah
Posted on December 20, 2011 at 3:19amI find Ron Paul is no better than an useful idiot; and he is a very dangerous guy.
Report Post »KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:21amAnd anyone insane enough to even think about going to war for no good reason when you are already $15+ Trillion in debt should be automatically disqualified too!
Dr. Ron Paul already predicted it last week. Since the corrupt media and establishment is seeing that the American people aren’t as dumb as we look to just fall head over heels to choose their pre chosen candidates Gettinrich and Romney the RINO they tried to black Dr. Paul but since they can’t you are going to start seeing a lot of media coverage of Dr. Paul, all negative and all trying to attack him. I and everyone I know are more than ready for the primary elections to vote for Dr. Paul because although he is not perfect he is light years ahead of the rest and is the only one serious about fighting for our freedom, liberty, and fiscal sanity in this country!
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:22pmRed State claims that Ron Paul is a 9/11 TRUTHER
http://www.redstate.com/
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 20, 2011 at 2:05pmClara, If you really listen to what Paul is saying, you would not throw out that he is a truther. He is talking about inept government officials that dropped the ball in their investigations of terrorist activities. He said there could be a cover up of the inept officials in order to not embarras the FBI when they had intel of the terrorists learning how to fly a plane and not needing to know how to land. If the FBI had that info, it should have been a red flag and maybe 9/11 could have been averted. The media also bashes Paul because the establishment is afraid of losing their hold. Jon Stewart said it best. Look at this Blaze article: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/jon-stewart-rips-media-for-ignoring-ron-paul/
Report Post »Now quit listening to the establishment media. Ron Paul 2012.
Clara88
Posted on December 20, 2011 at 2:30pmRed State happens to be a CONSERVATIVE BLOG!!!!
)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Veterans are supporting a VETERAN….Gov Rick Perry
Report Post »Our military deserves a Commander In Chief they can be PROUD of and RESPECT
GOD BLESS OUR BRAVE MILITARY AND OUR BELOVED BRAVE VETERANS
http://www.rickperry.org/veterans/
AND..he doesn’t golf…he likes guns *SMILE*
GOD BLESS THE 2ND AMENDMENT
jonnydoe
Posted on December 20, 2011 at 2:42pmNothing new. I think being in total disagreement with pinhead o’reilly is a good thing.
Did anyone really think for a minute he would support anyone outside of the Establishment?
Report Post »Puh-leeze.
Vechorik
Posted on December 20, 2011 at 4:25pmNew poll (Gingrich can’t beat Obama)
Registered voters:
Obama 52%, Romney 45%
Obama 52%, Paul 45%
All voters:
Obama 53%, Romney 43%
Obama 54%, Paul 43%
PDF: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2011/im…/20/rel20c.pdf
Report Post »W_Hart
Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:56pmOhReally is just another guy, [within a whole industry] who’s gonna lose a lot of income when Ron Paul is elected. What the blazes will he write all of those books about? What’s he gonna talk about to justify an hour of your prime time? OhReally has been making a fortune off of bad presidents, and bad policy for a loooong time. What makes people think that doesn’t effect his POV? He’s a sellout, and a traitor in my book.
Report Post »blondenblueeyed
Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:17pmRon Paul went OFF the deep end during the last debate. His foreign policy is a DISASTER. Besides I can’t get over the fact Ron Paul and Barney Frank sponsored a bill to legalize marijuana. Ron Paul will NOT be our next president. I hate to burst your bubble but he’s just not electable.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 12:11amAhLeahIris
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:03pm
And so it begins: The Establishment will now crucify Ron Paul
=============================================
Good! He needs to be sent home to retire anyway.
Report Post »Ron Paul was never going to be president so I say it’s time to pack his bags and call-off the clown act.
thepatriotdave
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 12:16amchewfatlip
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:25pm
Oh jeez, now it’s another 4 years of barry.
===============================
Yep! If the lefts plan to use Ron Paul as a wedge between those of us on the right is successful, we will have another 4 more of Obama the worst president in history. And we can blame the Paulbots on both sides.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 12:19amDelta D-5-3
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:32pm
Vechorik your view on Iran matches Pauls. You obviously will NEVER see the threat that Iran poses, or are you typing from Iran and are hoping for a Paul win??
==========================================
My thoughts also. The Paulbots are going to end up losing a chance to beat Obama. Which may be what 2/3rds of his supporters wanted in the first place.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 12:22amHey cause4liberty…
In 35 years of being a politician Ron Paul has never accomplished anything. Zilch, Zero, Nada!
He’s all talk and NO walk.
Report Post »Dcjones
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:57amYou should look at this video on Ron Pauls foreign policy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8NhRPo0WAo
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:13pmExcellent video.
It’s called “You Like Ron Paul, Except on Foreign Policy”, by the way.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:18pmIran and Syria have a defensive pact, and are a strong ally of Russia and China. A war with Iran opens up the real possibility of them getting involved, which then opens up the real possiblity of World War 3.
I laugh at O‘Reilly saying Ron Paul’s foreign policy is dangerous the same way I laughed at Bachmann when she sayed Ron Pauls non-interventionist policy is dangerous,– while she is proposing an attack on Iran which as said above could quickly turn into a World War. NATO/the West against Russia/China!
I think the Bachmann/Santorum/Romney/Gingrich proposals are dangerous!
Report Post »Rightallalong
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:35pmBILLO’s comments on the Oath to the Constitution and the apporval for the government to confiscate people means to defend themselves during Katrina disqualify him from being a Patriot – so all that leave is PINHEAD
Watch these videos and if it does not make you sick then you have a strong stomach or a dismissive attitude towards our rights!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jozdTBBS5Y
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICoiFBWGX4M
Treaty
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:12pmWake up fellow Republicans! Don’t let the MSM or RINOs wear you down. Gingrinch and Romney are the WRONG choice! We need to distance ourselves from them. Look at Ron Paul with an open mind – don’t let Bill persuade you. Is war with Iran what we want? No! Protect Israel yes. But no more stupid wars!
Report Post »texasfireguy
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:17pmOur best hope V is that both Syria and Iran collapse from within, as Syria looks like it is doing. I heard somewere (cant remember who) that if one of the two falls, the other will go soon after. They are both huge sponsors of terror (Hezbollah and Hamas are the most visible) and if they collapse, maybe some of the problems there might get better. We can only pray.
Report Post »There is no easy answer to either country, but Iran with nukes is a very bad thing. If you think for one second that they wouldnt try to slip one of those into our country to attack “The Great Satan”, you are delusional. They are hellbent on war with the US and our support of Israel makes no difference to them. Prey the “Arab Spring” makes it to Damascus and Tehran, and soon.
DrFrost
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:34pm@Vechorik
You’re analogy about thinking your neighbor is going to kill you so you kill him first is a little misleading so I thought I would modify it to see if I could make it more accurate.
In this new improved analogy (NIA), the neighbor (Iran) has personally threatened you, thrown bombs over the fence, payed the local gang members to attack you, called the media and anyone else who would listen to tell them that he’s going to go get the biggest rifle he can and use it against you. No one would sell him an actual gun but he‘s admitted to buying all the right parts and tells everyone he’s working tirelessly to finish building it so he can use it and wipe you off the face of the planet. He‘s also a religious fanatic and believes that by destroying you he’ll somehow be ushering in a world wide utopia. And none of these facts are really in question, with mountains of evidence for each (as if evidence were needed when the neighbor gleefully admits to all of it).
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 3:11pmWhat About the IRAN-CONTRA scandal? Didnt we sell missiles to IRAN with proceeds going to the contras? We’ve gone from illegally selling arms to Iran (O. North aka E. HOLDER) to wanting a war with IRAN? Why was saddam our ally, then our enemy? Why did we fund/train Osama and the muhajadeen? Why do the corrupt politicians make enormous profits from the Military and prison industrial complex???
Report Post »SEPARATENOW
Posted on December 20, 2011 at 4:45pm@Vechorik
Report Post »So if/when Iran nukes Israel, what do we do then?
libertyforall26
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:56amRon Paul’s foreign policy of endeavoring to have peaceful relations will all nations, going to war only when war is declared by Congress, and using diplomacy to avert military conflict is SCARY! I **** my pants!
Report Post »Timothy_Reid
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:03pmGood point, that would be like actually following the US Constitution……..can’t have that…..(oh scary)
Report Post »ConservativeCharlie
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:06pmRon Paul would be the best thing in the last 100 years for this country. Dont worry war mongerers we will still go to war if we need to.. but it will be congress that sends us there and not a dictator. Video of Ron Paul supporter being water boarded. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02Pv1KQGNU0
Report Post »Nanner-SW
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:07pmHow bout we do things the constitutional way? Stay out of foreign affairs unless asked for or unless Congress acts. If they don’t then do nothing, no aid, no sanctions, no feet on the ground. If war is declared, carpet bomb all political and military centers, after all you only put feet on the ground if you want to protect something (people, land, resources). Rather than believe that the foreign policy of nothing or everything, war or no war, is weak and gives benefit to our enemies, lets consider a reality where congress actually does its job and declares war when a country posses a real direct threat and won’t back down even when addressed through peaceful, democratic means. Let’s pretend for just three days the United States was allowed to go ALL OUT on our enemies. The following morning the only issue would be who gets the, now slightly damaged and unclaimed, territory and resources. Under this potential the policy goes from not being unpopular for being weak and catering to our enemies, to being brutal, bloody, and against the moral sensibilities of our population today.
Report Post »merr2254
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:11pmWell, how about this: clean yourself up, put on your big boy pants and deal with it. People may be listening to Ron Paul but they surely are not HEARING him! They twist his words to mean other than what he says. He is a constitutionalist and that is the only way we are going to ever get out of this mess we are in.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:16pmYep. Lots of supposed “small government” folks actually aren’t, they are just giddy about international military adventurism (as was Wilson) and love nothing more than running around dictating to people at barrel point how to live. It is and has always been a fully anti-American expression in my view. If you cannot abide by the Constitution regarding war, then don’t expect the Left to respect the Constitution when you find yourself under assault from them.
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:34pmDrill Here – then we do not need the middle east, and OPEC will not control our economy.
Report Post »Open up shale oil and work with Canada on the oil sands.
Attack our enemies with extreme prejudice – if they attack our vital interests.
Iran will develop a nuke unless we attack them. They need the weapon so we don’t attack them. Its a Circular arguement.
We have two choices; we can attack them, or we can let them have the bomb. If we know where their nuke sites are, we can destroy them remotely, but they will respond in ways that will hurt us – we would need to invade.
They will not use the bomb. If they do, even Russia will be against them – and their sand will turn to glass. China has its own problems with Muslims; they will not like a Muslim nation using a nuke.
Pakistan, and North Korea have Nukes; why have they not attacked us – they don’t like us any more that Iran does.
Paul’s view is, apparently, don‘t threaten them and don’t allow them to hurt us. If that is his position, I agree.
mmcdonald628
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:54amYes, it’s always 1939…
People who are comparing the situation in Iran to Nazi Germany are clueless, as are the people comparing Ron Paul to Neville Chamberlin. Appeasement is not the same policy as non-interventionism. Not even close. And Iran is no where near the power that Germany was.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:23pmO‘Reilly would have been more honest if he compared the progressive Republicans’ votes on the antiPatriot Act and the NDAA to HITLER. It’s exactly what Hitler did in Germany to “control the people.”
“One of the most traumatic events in German history occurred soon after Hitler took office. On February 27, 1933, in what easily could be termed the 9/11 terrorist attack of that time, German terrorists fire-bombed the German parliament building. It shouldn’t surprise anyone that Adolf Hitler, one of the strongest political leaders in history, would declare war on terrorism and ask the German parliament (the Reichstag) to give him temporary emergency powers to fight the terrorists. Passionately claiming that such powers were necessary to protect the freedom and well-being of the German people, Hitler persuaded the German legislators to give him the emergency powers he needed to confront the terrorist crisis. What became known as the Enabling Act allowed Hitler to suspend civil liberties “temporarily,” that is, until the crisis had passed. Not surprisingly, however, the threat of terrorism never subsided and Hitler’s “temporary” emergency powers, which were periodically renewed by the Reichstag, were still in effect when he took his own life some 12 years later.”
Report Post »http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0703a.asp
tzion
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:27pmBefore Hitler, Germany wasn’t powerful either. Money was so cheap it cost more to print it than it was actually worth. Hitler got powerful because no one bothered to stop him when they had the chance. And as for Paul not being an appeaser, by saying that we’ve brought the dislike of the Arabs upon ourselves is essentially the same thing. He thinks that if we leave everyone will like us. Should we bring our troops home? Perhaps. But if we do we shouldn’t turn our backs. Ron Paul doesn’t think a nuclear Iran is a threat. It’s not about whether we should attack them or not, it’s about whether we should consider them dangerous.
Report Post »Timothy_Reid
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:53amIt’s funny how most Paul haters can bag on his foreign policy (and even then they have no idea what they’re talking about, but they can quote the conservative talking heads just as well as the liberals can theirs) but fail to bag on the five or six other bad policies or flip flopping of whatever candidate they favor. These people simply take their talking points from the conservative side instead of the liberal side, they still do no real research on their own.
Report Post »PatriotNAmerica
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:02pmSo true. They are never forced to answer the question of how they would go about prohibiting Iran from attaining a Nuke. Never forced to answer how many men women and children would you sacrifise in order to ensure that it does’t happen. How much more treasure would you waste in the Middle East even though we are so in debt… etc. It’s all a big joke for the Neo-Cons. They just want to keep rattling their sabers.
Report Post »JoeInAlbany
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:05pmIt’s funny how the Paul lovers call anyone who disagrees with their candidate a “Paul Hater”.
Report Post »Timothy_Reid
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:13pm@joe as opposed to what…..Paul great guy, but not my candidate ers, or Paul don’t like his foreign policy ers? Sorry just call me politically incorrect, now would you like to disagree with the actual post instead of just how your feelings got hurt cause you got cawwed a name? I’m sowwy…..
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:36pmPaul is going to lose for three simple reasons. First, his policies and priorities aren’t shared by most other people. His economic policies to a certain degree resonate with Republican voters. If we were just electing a president based on economics, We (I) would give him a slight chance. But we’re not. A presidential campaign is about emotions concerning a lot of different things. If Paul ends up being seen as a serious candidate (which I don’t believe will happen except in Iowa), he will be pummeled with his previous stances on military policy, foreign policy and social issues all… leftist and Liberal. His views are wayyy far out of step with Republican primary voters. That in itself will be enough to kill his chances of winning.
Second, the media (like O’Reilly… very large audience btw) doesn’t believe that Paul has a chance, so he’s not going to get especially favorable coverage. Nothing about him plays into any of the sort of story lines that media like to tell, but they WILL hone in on the goofy and let’s face it… dangerous parts of the Paul nutty idea assembly plant.
Third, even if one could get past the fact that Paul’s positions radically diverging from those of Republican primary voters and even if Paul could convince the media to treat him as one of the top candidates, there’s one issue that will destroy him… his position regarding the war on drugs plain and simple.
Get over it, that’s the way it is… tough cookies.
Report Post »Timothy_Reid
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:01pm@yepimaconservative So are you not voting for him because you think he can‘t win or because you don’t agree with where he stands?
Report Post »texasfireguy
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:11pmA vote for Paul is a vote for Obama. Period. If he runs as a third candidate, Obama wins and we have 4 more years of that crap. we will be bending over and grabbing our ankles for the Unions, Acorn (whatever its called now), the Occupiers, etc, etc, etc. I‘m not saying I’m against Paul, I do like some of what he says. I just dont believe he can get elected (either as a Republican or as an Independent) and I think ANY of the republican candidates (and I’m not really crazy about any of them) would be better than Obumbler, the Marxist America Hater in Chief.
Report Post »dimitrisokolov
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:14pm@YEPIMACONSERVATIVE – so following the Constitution, auditing the Fed, not meddling in the affairs of other countries and having a balanced budget are “radical” ideas? Ron Paul’s ideas are just common sense. The rest of the Republican party has gone insane and the inmates are running the asylum. If Ron Paul is not the nominee, then I will vote for Obama again to teach the GOP a lesson. Let Obama run the country into the ground. The GOP doesn’t deserve to win with this crop of candidates. The GOP’s choice of McCain as their nominee is what got Obama elected in the first place. The GOP is still clueless. The Tea Party needs to grow a pair and split off into a third party.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:20pm> TIMOTHY. I was trying to be nice in my posting regarding Paul this time around, but if you’re going to put me on the spot like that I have to answer honestly.
Paul is a fuggin’ nut, a crank and a gadfy… IMO. His past and present leftist views are dubious and dangerous to say the least. His associates (those closest to him like Lew Rockwell) add to that dangerousness and those that attach their vision of America to his (his vast array of supporters including Neo-nazis, other Un American and leftist groups etc) are the dung heap of America and need to be marginalized. That is all.
TY for asking. I will not be voting for Paul.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:35pmYepImAConservative is a known Progressive and was exposed on the blaze as such. Yep is for government INTERVENING in business affairs so much the government tells you what to serve, when to serve it, how to serve it, and every aspect of operating your business.
Yep is also for war against any nation who does not do as the USA says to do which is also Progressive.
Don’t bother wasting your time with this fake conservative.
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:57pm@ okie I‘ve read many of yep’s comments and where as they are a bit lengthy, I don’t quite see it that way. When he(as I do) share his view of ron he is immediately misquoted or words added to his thoughts. It’s amazing how paul supporters turn psyhic when the holy one is called to task. Stop assuming you know every view one holds because you feel the need to protect ole ron.
Now go back to enjoying you medicinal marijuana.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:03pm> DIMITRI.
“If Ron Paul is not the nominee, then I will vote for Obama [again] to teach the GOP a lesson.”
The rest of what you say falls on blind eyes, and deaf ears. Seen and and heard all the Paul infomercial BS before.
Fuggin’ Traitors and cowards.
Obama/Paul
Report Post »2012
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:17pm@JL Gunner
I honestly couldn‘t care less what you think as I’ve held the conversations with Yeppie the progressive and those are his own words. He believes Government should regulate business and tell business what to serve, when to serve it, how to serve it, and where to serve it.
Yep the Progressive only posts negatives about Ron Paul. 95% of his posts regardless of the topic is a negative about Ron Paul. Yeppie is an antagonizer and likes to start trouble. DIVISION, another sign of a progressive.
I have no need to protect Ron. I do have the responsibility to tell the truth and I hope one day you learn to do so as well.
It’s amazing how non Ron Paul supporters turn to psychotic zombies and try to lie about his views, where they align with the Constitution, and falsely label him.
If you are a progressive too JL Gunner, have the honor and integrity to say so and quit being a coward calling yourself a conservative. You and Obama keep the same policy, Intervention. How is that conservative?
Now go kicks rocks you LEFTY…..
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:30pm> JL. “Medicinal Marijuana!” LMAO. You know what? Sounds obout RIGHT! LOL.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:45pm> LMAO @OPIE….. AGAIN.
Actually what you wrote are not my words, they are yours. But you go with that okay? Yes, I am for health and safety standards.
As far as me, a well rounded Conservative antagonising a bunch of Thrifty-Liberals? You betcha’ as Sarah Palin would say. Makes my day. I’m guilty. My antagonizing however speaks the truth about Ron Paul. If you can’t handle that, I suggest you put me back on “ignore” lol. But I know you’ll still be reading as you want to learn ALL that you can about Ron Paul to make an intelligent decision in the nomination process right?
Report Post »Timothy_Reid
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 3:00pm@yep so it’s because of what he stands for then, correct?
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 3:09pm@YepImAProgressive
Actually they are your words. Would you like me to post the link to you saying those words from our previous conversation? You probably also think Government should ban salt and sugar too, huh? You are a big government guy, we all know it.
I will correct everyone of your posts. You cannot debate because you know you are wrong and as you stated, you are just looking to stir up trouble and division. To do so you knowingly post false information, insult, and name call. There is never ever any substance in your post, just crap, like you….
A person who feeds off of negativity has problems. Mental problems. Something you might want to get checked out.
You and John McCain are one in the same….
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 3:20pmYep and JL Gunner are most like Liberals…..
Intervention by Government whether intervening in Domestic issues or foreign Nations is to the LEFT of the Constitution. It’s MORE Government.
Yep and JL Gunner want MORE Government!!! They are LEFTIES!
Total==============================================Anarchy
Gov ^
Constitution
^ ^
Intervention No-Intervention
Foreign Aid No foreign Aid
Domestic Welfare Self Reliance
World Government No World Government
Yeppie is a proven LEFTY!!! Yeppie the LEFTY wants MORE Government like Obama, Bush, and McCain!!! Yeppie is a LEFTY!!!
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:04pmYEPIMATROLL
Report Post »Is paid by the gov to spread confusion and misinformation, follow ALL his posts, he NEVER has real facts and only gives the talking points given out by the MIC and the corrupt progressives, for example 9 out of ten posts will hit the propaganda words against Dr Ron Paul (crazy, nut, unelectable, old) watch him he never deviates even when confronted with facts and truth…he is a paid gov troll.
West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:54amHey Yep, Nice to see that you are still trying to convince people that Progressivism is the way to go. But, OMG, new poll showing Paul ahead, Fox News (your favorite news orginazation) freaking out and not knowing what to say but , Paul is a kook, this is scary, OMG!! Paul money bomb over $4,000,000.00!! The people are taking off their blinders and seeing the truth. Your beliefs are not what the majority of Americans believe anymore. People are waking up to media hacks like O’Reilly constantly. I mean the man needs to be in anger management classes. See here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbMoWt7i7Jc&feature=related
Report Post »One more thing there Yep, you just show your ignorance on subjects continually and ignorance is not a virtue. Paul’s stance on the war on drugs is: “The war on drugs is a failure. We spend billions of dollars on this supposed war and still every person who wants to buy drugs can do so. It is not in the Constitution that the Federal government has the authority to do this. Ths is an issue that should be directed to the states.” What he is saying is the Constitution does not give the Fed gov the power to make laws concerning drugs (socialism). The states can do this and if a person does not like the laws of their state, they can move to another, or if the majority of the residents of the state want to change the laws, thaey can by voting in candidates that will do what they want. Easier to do at the state level than the Fed level. Makes sense, huh? If not to y
TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:52amI assume you Paulbots all heard Ron baby tell Jay Leno “Michele Bachman hates Muslums.”
A non-true statement and very reckless of the good doctor. Shame.
Report Post »Timothy_Reid
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:56amYes tron, that applies to this situation, way to go……Do you have any other brilliant statements to make?
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:59amit was hilarious and honest.
your girl is a xenophobe, just accept it and move on.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:11pmIf Iran hates Jews, why haven’t they killed the ones living in Iran?
25,000 Jews live in Iran. It’s the largest Jewish population in the Middle East outside of Israel. Iranian Jews are not persecuted or abused by the state, in fact, they are protected under Iran’s constitution. They are free to practice their religion and to vote in elections. They are not stopped and searched at checkpoints, they are not brutalized by an occupying army, and they are not herded into a densely-populated penal colony (Gaza) where they are deprived of the basic means of survival. Iranian Jews live in dignity and enjoy the benefits of citizenship.
Ahmadinejad is demonized in the western media. He is called an anti-Semite and the “new Hitler”. But if those claims are true, then why did the majority of Iran’s Jews vote for Ahmadinejad in recent presidential elections?
He never said that he wanted to “wipe Israel off the map”. That’s another fiction.
“This myth has been endlessly recycled since a translating error was made of a speech Ahmadinejad delivered nearly two years ago. Farsi experts have verified that the Iranian president, far from threatening to destroy Israel, was quoting from an earlier speech by the late Ayatollah Khomeini in which he reassured supporters of the Palestinians that “the Zionist regime in Jerusalem” would “vanish from the page of time.”
He was not threatening to exterminate Jews or even Israel. He was comparing Israel’s occupati
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:14pmMany my friend, many. Wise up and run from Paul.
Report Post »Timothy_Reid
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:22pm@tron such as…..
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:25pmTRONINTHEMORNING, it’s people like you (biased) that don’t deserve a microphone.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:50pmIf you get your own mic maybe you can spread your bias…
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:50pmAre US and Israel trying to create the justification for another war? Is that why the media credits Ahmadinejad with saying things that he never really said. He never said that he wanted to “wipe Israel off the map”. That’s another fiction. Author Jonathan Cook explains what the Iranian president really said:
“This myth has been endlessly recycled since a translating error was made of a speech Ahmadinejad delivered nearly two years ago. Farsi experts have verified that the Iranian president, far from threatening to destroy Israel, was quoting from an earlier speech by the late Ayatollah Khomeini in which he reassured supporters of the Palestinians that “the Zionist regime in Jerusalem” would “vanish from the page of time.”
He was not threatening to exterminate Jews or even Israel. He was comparing Israel’s occupation of the Palestinians with other illegitimate systems of rule whose time had passed, including the Shahs who once ruled Iran, apartheid South Africa and the Soviet empire. Nonetheless, this erroneous translation has survived and prospered because Israel and its supporters have exploited it for their own crude propaganda purposes.”
Could it be that most of what we know about Ahmadinejad is propaganda?
Timothy_Reid
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:03pm@tron At least you’re admitting to being biased instead of looking at things rationally, I can at least give you a little respect for the honesty of that. Otherwise I’m still waiting for your brilliant statements….
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:05pmTRONINTHEMORNING bias isn’t as bad as the name-calling. How about facts, instead of attacks?
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 4:15pm@tron
Report Post »If you dont like the truth then you should be talking about Bachmann Lying at the last debate. The truth never crossed her lips. Did you not see what happen to Perry, Cain, and Trump when they messed with the Dr.? Bachmann is way out of her league here. Bachmann is just graping at straws, she doesn’t even have a staff in NH anymore.
KidCharlemagne
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:52amO’Reilly is paralyzed from the neck up…
Iran doesn’t even have to fire a shot:
http://www.usdebtclock.org
All they have to do is to entice us into bankrupting ourselves:
“Bin Laden: Goal is to bankrupt U.S.
November 01, 2004
“We are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah,” bin Laden said in the transcript.
He said the mujahedeen fighters did the same thing to the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the 1980s, “using guerrilla warfare and the war of attrition to fight tyrannical superpowers.”
“We, alongside the mujahedeen, bled Russia for 10 years until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in defeat,” bin Laden said.
He also said al Qaeda has found it “easy for us to provoke and bait this administration.”
Report Post »http://articles.cnn.com/2004-11-01/world/binladen.tape_1_al-jazeera-qaeda-bin?_s=PM:WORLD
texasfireguy
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:20pmI think the Soviet Union spending money trying to match the US had more to do with their collapse than Ban Lauden and his ilk did.
Report Post »Fella
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:49amBill O banging his war drum like a monkey. Invading Iran is starting to sound more like a campaign promise that the neocons and progressives just want to hear. “C’mon Paul, say something hawkish to feed this bloodlust”
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:59amIt would be the ultimate collective slap to the face of Dick Morris, Bill O Reilly, Limbaugh, Chris Wallace, George Stephanopolous if Ron Paul wins both Iowa and NH — 2 wins to start would be unforgettable.
Why didn’t the Blaze post the article about Ron Paul predicted to win Iowa and place at least 2nd in New Hampshire? Now THAT’s news!
Report Post »M13
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:00pmSo Iran Hasn’t been beating the war drum for 30 years? What are all those IEDs that have been killing Americans, Do you believe that it’s Americas fault that Iran does that or that we deserved to be attacked ?
Report Post »Fella
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:20pm@M13, All that drum beating and you can‘t tell me why they haven’t done anything yet?
Check this map and ask yourself why they might want a nuclear deterrent.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7165/6488093197_cd253f990b_z.jpg
I don’t have time to go over the history of Iran with you, but you may want to give it a look-see. Some interesting things occured in the 80′s you might find relevant. Lol Please stop viewing this situation in a vacuum and you might gain the ability to put this situation in the proper perspective.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:29pm..more like the US beating the war drum for 58 years!
History of US intervention in Iran:
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fy3KDYE5KQE
Love_John_Galt
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:56pm@M13 – IEDs wouldn‘t be killing Americans if we weren’t in their country. Unless you know of IEDs in the USA, I don‘t think that’s a viable reason.
Report Post »libertyforall26
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:47amRon Paul has brass balls, and knows that we are the strongest military on earth, that we can wipe the entire country off the map if we wanted to, and therefore, he does fear Iran the way the chickenhawks do. Bill O’really compares Ron Paul to Chamberlain, but fails to mention one country Iran has invaded in the last 100 years, so the comparison is unfair.
Report Post »Ron Paul seeks to have peaceful relations with all nations, wtf is so scary about that? He also recognizes that diplomacy is what averted a nuclear exchange during the Cuban Missile crisis. M’Fers like Bill Oreilly would have preffered the bomb to diplomacy. No talking to the “enemy”, can’t have that. What WOULD YOU PREFER?
Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:51amFox said from the beginning — It’s Romney.
They have been doing everything on earth to make sure that’s true.
Look what they did to Mr. Cain as an example!
I think Fox would even be happier with Newt!
Sad, sad, sad media manipulation of facts for the people. No better than the left bias.
I find myself watching CNN more and more. THEY seem to be “fair and balanced” to me.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:56amEVERY SINGLE ONE of us, Bill O’Reilly and every candidate on the Republican ticket would to have peaceful relations with all nations, The difference in us and Ron Paul (and his cult following) is that the rest of us live in the real world.
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:11pmBill is just like the rest of the “presstitutes.“ He claims to be ”for the folks” when in actuality he is for whoever his bosses tell him he is for.
Here is the bottom line.
RON PAUL HAS RECEIVED MORE DONATIONS FROM ACTIVE DUTY MILITARY THAN ALL OF THE OTHER REPUBLICANS COMBINED, AND EVEN MORE THAN OHMAMMA.
The military knows MORE about bad foreign policy than much of the “keyboard warriors” here, and they also that Ron Paul (being a fellow veteran) will use them judiciously and wisely according to the Constitution to which THEY ALL SWORE AN OATH TO.
Is Iran going to develop some sort of “special nuke” that spares the Palestinians? If Iran hates Jews so much, then why do they have over 25,000 still living in their country? Their history dates back 2500 years with Persia.
Don’t believe the hysteria.
Amhandinejad was talking about the Govt. of Israel, not the people. The people are NOT the “regime.”
Iran is part of the Non Proliferation Treaty.
Report Post »Is Israel? No.
They have NEVER been accountable for their nuke program that they‘ve had since the late 50’s in Dimona.
Israel is estimated to have over 300 nukes WITH delivery systems. They are MASTER weapons and defense technology makers.(many times improving on OUR equipment)
They are not some poor dry strip of land that is defenseless. They are 10 years advanced militarily than anyone in the neighborhood.
Listen to the military
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=I8NhRPo0WAo#!
libertylion
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:26pm@ qpwillie
I live in the real world and am a huge supporter of RP.
I guess you think that TSA keeps you safe at the airport also or that Homeland Security is really protecting you? They are both govt facades to keep you living in fear. A US high school student could figure out many soft targets across the states and do considerable damage to the population. You just keep on eating from the talking heads trough.
Why would you think spreading our military across the globe keeps you safe? What a pile of horse manure.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:34pmQPWILLIE, why are you so afraid of Iran?
Report Post »Have you seen this?
Map of Iran and US military bases:
http://www.bluerepublican.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/US-bases-in-Middle-East.jpg
lylejk
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:47amI haven’t been watching much of Bill of late, but I have to agree that Ron Paul’s assessment of Iran is wrong. Not going to point fingers of blame as to why Iran is as it is, but it is, and now it needs to be addressed. Iran is more then on it‘s way to acquiring nukes and that’s unacceptable period. This and has stance that is not very pro-Israel prevents me from supporting Ron in the primaries, but if it was only between Paul and Gingrich, I would vote Paul. Still, come on Ron. I have a hard time believing that you wouldn’t do anything to stop Iran from getting a nuke. :)
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:53amMaybe Dr. Paul would do something LEGAL to stop it. He surely won’t break the law. Dr. Paul supports “letters of marquee and reprisal” which is sorta like “put a bounty on them.” It’s how Bin Laden was killed “legally” without declaring war on a country — targets individuals.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:41pmI haven‘t been watching O’Reilly much lately either. I always switch the channel to Fox BUSINESS news and watch Judge Napolitano on “Freedom Watch” He has the news of the day and show how Congress is constantly shredding the constitution. Love that show!
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 10:59pmTROLLINTHEMORNING is a paid SPOOK to disseminate false and misleading info on the blaze.
Report Post »blue_sky
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:43am.
Neo-con O‘Reilly is soooooo 90’s. Young generation knows better what is good for their future
Money bomb at RonPaul2012 is over $4,000,000.00. Do your part!
.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:46amI saw that….WOW! Don’t think his followers are listening to Bill…
http://www.dailypaul.com/192852/friday-ron-paul-tea-party-moneybomb-december-16-2011
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:48amGive the money back; Paul is unelectable.
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:48amhttp://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/12/gingrich-collapses-iowa-ron-paul-surges-front/46360/#.Tu9TVFQZbI0.facebook
ron paul is winning iowa. the neocons lose this one…
Report Post »jimroc
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:54amA dark cloud is gathering.
Report Post »We must consolidate together inside our borders.
Ron Paul must be our leader.
How was the kool-aid Bill.
PatriotNAmerica
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:59amDoesn’t Oreilly work for Rupert Murdoch and Israeli citizen? Does that disqualify Bill from having an unbiased opinion on Iran? lol
The Neo-Cons policy of endless War for the Military Industrial Complex and the state of Israel are fast approaching an end. Americans are beginning to get wise to the propaganda of the Media, the see the innumerable inconsistencies, and besides all of that America is in debt up to its eyeballs! There’s no more money to waste on policing the Globe for special interests!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:12pmYes, MURDOCH!
The people must be kept in a state of fear and their anger focused on some “out” group or they will start to object to having their fortunes, freedoms, and children taken from them. So the new boogyman is Islamo-fascism. And just like the Chinese, the Russians, the Nazis, the Hun, they are threatening to take over the world and destroy our way of life. They are threatening from without so we must go around the world fighting them, and they are (insidiously) threatening from within so we must suspend our liberties to fight them here.
The techniques of manipulation have only gotten better over the decades. They use lies spread through the internet. They use television. But mostly they rely on the demagogue. The susceptibility of the human mind to manipulation through the emotions has led to the manipulation specialist. Men like Newt Gingrich, Golem-like in their utter corruption from the quest for power, try to stimulate pride by invoking love of the homeland, stimulate fear with the specter of being invaded, focus hatred on an “out” group, and voila! You have a mob ready for blood.
Bachmann/Sanrotum/Romney and Gingrich play the same game — fooling Americans.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 4:36pm@tron
Report Post »Wrong again, Its Cain who should be giving the money back.
OBAMA IS A FOUL EVIL TRAITOR
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:42amHow long are we going to take CRAP from Iran??? .. BOMB THEM INTO THE STONE AGE! NUKE IRAN NOW!!! .. MAKE THOSE RAG HEADED FILTH ONE BIG SHEET OF GLASS!!! .. DO IT NOW!
Report Post »blue_sky
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:47am.
Pentagon and trade unions at Lockheed Martin, Boeing and General Dynamics do not want you to know that majority of Israelis themselves (represented in their Congress by thirteen political parties) DO NOT want war with Iran.
Also majority of Americans do not want $10 gas at the pump, $300/mo electric bill and 15% inflation just to feed Pentagon, lobbyists and war hungry idiots.
.
Report Post »OBAMA IS A FOUL EVIL TRAITOR
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:01pm@Blue_Sky
You and your Gay friends (and Obama) will ALWAYS be ‘Appeasers’ and supporters of Evil. You live in a ‘Blue_Sky’ dream land of Transsexuals and Bestiality!
Report Post »BoomSlander
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:41amPropaganda scares the masses.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:38amIm not a Paul supporter, but the time to stop Iran is now or even under Bush….. We have got to get out of these foriegn adventures, we are broke, and getting broker by the day !!!! Let Israel handle this, and let the world know we will back em up, i am very pro military, but at what point do we stop policing the world, or at least get paid to do so, i am way more concerned about our southern border and the national security implications down there , than i am about Iran…… If we dont get our domestic policy in order, we wont even have a. Foriegn policy to worry about, we are BANKRUPT, does nobody get that ???? No money, no foriegn policy….
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:43amO‘Reilly is just upset that Ron Paul is leading the polls to win Iowa and O’Reilly bet Stossel that Dr. Paul wouldn’t win, not even one state.
I think O‘Reilly’s pride hurts him more than the $1,000 he has to pay Stossel!
Funny, O’Reilly never says “exactly what” about Dr. Paul’s foreign policy bothers him. He sure talks a lot about other subjects. Why not that one?
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:37amTrue.
Report Post »streetfighter
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:33amWould someone please put forth a realistic policy regarding Iran. What would Bill do? All I see is the pounding of chests and no action by anyone. Cowards. Ron Paul at least speaks the truth.
Report Post »By the way Ron Paul just took the lead in Iowa!
Libertarian
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:38amBill O”Reilly is a progressive.
I haven’t watched that man for years, except when Glenn Beck does him a favor and puts him on his show.
Let the people decide who they want to represent them. Not some pundit that wants to maintain the status quo.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:45am@Libertarian
“Bill O”Reilly is a progressive.”
ROTFL!! Who, that we’ve all heard of is not a “progressive”? Of course I mean who besides Ron Paul.
Report Post »Libertarian
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:54am@qpwillie,
Here is the difference, wanting states to decide social issues is not a “progressive” point of view, its a constitutional one.
See people like yourself want to control morality at the federal level, but scream about federal usurpation when it is a health care mandate.
I guarantee you are inconsistent when it comes to the constitution. Care to take that challenge?
Care to take that challenge?
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:04pm@Libertarian
Don’t worry about it. I knew you couldn’t name one.
Report Post »Dustoff
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:15pmRon Paul at least speaks the truth.
**************************************************
Like the “truth” on PORK spending?
Report Post »RP sure loves that pork, which we all pay for.
Libertarian
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:20pm@qpwillie,
Of course I can‘t name why Bill O’Reilly verbatim, is a progressive, because I stopped watching him 3-4 years ago. I can‘t say that he hasn’t had a “Mit Romney revival” in his big government leanings, he may be a changed man.
However, I stopped watching him because he was a big government progressive with conservative social values, much like Gingrich and Mit Romney. He was/is a Bill Kristol/Bill Bennett neo-con. It would be disingenuous to give you an example of a person I watched 3-4 years ago. I am certain I stopped watching him because he was to progressive for me.
That is all =)
Report Post »Rightallalong
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:46pmBILLO’s is disqualified for not supporting the constitution
Watch these videos and if it does not make you sick then you have a strong stomach or a dismissive attitude towards our rights!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jozdTBBS5Y
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICoiFBWGX4M
qpwillie
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:19pm@Libertarian
Report Post »You can’t even understand my question. I asked “Who, that we’ve all heard of is not a “progressive”? Of course I mean who besides Ron Paul.”
and you addressed a completely different question.
c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 4:05pm@willie
Report Post »Rand Paul, Justin Amash, and Gary Johnson of the top of my head.
West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 20, 2011 at 1:26amQP, The people are waking up, when are you? Paul money bomb (donations from average Americans, not big corporations) over $4,000,000.00!! Paul in the top of the latest poll; Paul 23%, Romney 20%, Gingrich 14%! Why are you so against getting back to Constitutional principles? Are you afraid of the sacrifice that you will have to make in order for your children to continue to experience Liberty? It will take sacrifice, but i am willing to do so. If we elect another Progressive and the economy crashes, which will cause our government to fall, what will happen to our way of life? Do you even understand the consequences of that? I am thinking you have not given it much thought. That is being ignorant to the facts and ignorance is not a virtue. Ron Paul 2012.
Report Post »KickinBack
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:28amRon Paul = UNELECTABLE
I like his libertarian views (some, not all) but as a realist, you have to remember that it is the independents who swing elections, and Paul’s views are just too drastic.
Report Post »Like the old adage about losing weight…”You didn’t gain it all overnight, you sure is hell aren’t going to lose it overnight..”
Baddoggy
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:35amThe Constitution is too drastic? Wow.
Report Post »bbyrdhouse
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:42amHe is only “UNELECTABLE” if folks like you do not vote for him.
He is very ELECTABLE if people would realize that the most serious issue we face at current is NOT Iran, but our Constitution.
Lets get the most serious thing fixed first and then we can vote in somebody that will nuke Iran …
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:46amKickingbac, Dr. Paul is leading the polls in Iowa and second in New Hampshire.
Report Post »It‘s a bit early to say he’s unelectable, isn’t it?
You’re just parroting Fox News (which is owned by the biggest war-machine-pushing guy on earth, Rupert Murdoch)
blue_sky
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:51amI like when people who cherry pick the Constitution to fit their agenda and do not mind communist China paying for our troops clothes, food & weapons call Ron Paul crazy or unelectable. New generation of young Americans look with contempt on these old school neo-cons and cannot wait to see them wither away.
Report Post »KickinBack
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:05pmApparently you Paulbots only “cherry-pic” what you want to read in my post. If Paul won the republican nomination, I’d vote for him. But not because I’m voting FOR Paul, as much as I’m voting AGAINST Obama.
However, if your dear leader does not get the nom, then God help us all if your sad devotion to this ancient religion decides to run as an independent, as there will be no more Constitution.
Report Post »Libertarian
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:29pm@KickinBack,
This has been a tough question for me because president’s in their 2nd term are disastrous. So do I hold my nose and vote for “anybody but Obama”? Right now, no.
It is frustrating watching people like yourself come around so slowly for the constitution, watching people like you deprogram yourselves from the press created idea of “electability”. Even liberals understand that a community organizer from one of the most corrupt states in the union with a history of socialist/communist connections could get elected to the highest office in the land.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:04pm@Libertarian – We don’t have to hold our nose – If RP isn’t on the ballot – write his name in. It’s time we stop letting the machine (and the media) force our hand.
I will not vote for a Progressive Republican just to keep a Progressive Democrat from winning – they are one in the same.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 20, 2011 at 1:48amKickinback, When you say these tyoe of things, you sound just like a Progressive and the people that are waking up will not listen to you anymoere, especially when we Paul supperters reply with truths. Paul is electable, it shows in the recent polls, in his newest money bomb at over 4 Million dollars (donations from average Americans with approx 60-70% veterans (like myself) and active duty military. My only fear is that when Paul gets the nomination, he will be at risk of assassination from the FED and other big money people. I pray for his safety continually. This is a real fear as the establishment wants the people that you want in order to continue business as usual. Do not continue to be fooled.
Report Post »jakartaman
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:28amYes Bill we know all about tinfoil head!
Report Post »Maxim Crux
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:27amWhat qualifies Oreilly to have an opinion show called the Factor? Anyone that slanders the word FACT should not be permitted to have a show with false opinion. Oreilly never said that about OBAMA and look how far his foreign policy and his unqualification has taken the world. Personally I do not agree with Ron Paul on Iran, but since Iran already has nukes from the good job the Clinton, Bush and Obama, I do not see how his policy is much different other he his not saying one thing and doing another.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:35amHe was given a degree from the same mill that gave Obama one?
Report Post »SheriS
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:52amPerhaps toning down your words would serve you well! I do watch Bill’s shows and often disagree with him, but listening to his words gives you the chance to realize what you believe. I do not like Ron Paul, I will not vote for him as he is in the same class as Gingrich—-both have ideas that will make them unelectable—as a Conservative, Gingrich is definitely not of the conservative side, and has stated he is a “Wilsonian Progressive”—he is the last person I want running for President for that statement alone! Then you have the angry old man, Paul, who is a Libertarian and is not electable even tho he does stand for the Constitution, but he too is unelectable because he comes across as the angry old man with a few screws that have loosened!
Report Post »Libertarian
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:07pm@Sheris,
“Paul, who is a Libertarian and is not electable even tho he does stand for the Constitution”
_______________
Ya that constitution thingy is a crazy idea. We need a smoother talker like Stalin or Lenin, forget values or the conditioned idea of “electability” by a bought press.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:22pmMillions of Americans love that “crazy old man” and I can’t wait for the pretenders to drop out of the presidential race.
When you have a choice of progressive, flipper Mitt Romney and the Constitutionalist, Ron Paul or progressive Obama — Which do you choose? THAT’s the question.
When it gets down to Dr. Paul vs Obama — all the polls say Dr. Paul wins.
Report Post »That’s my dream for America — to save us financially and stop the new world order in its tracks!
JLGunner
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:27amRon Paul is an isolationist. He thinks it’s ok for Iran to have a nuke. Iran openly says that they want to “drive Israel into the sea on there way to destroy America”. I can only take these folks at their word. I don‘t need a pacifist in office when we can’t even stop the cultural jihad on my country under barack and his socialistic administration.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:34amSo you are for Nation building when we are flat broke? Good for you. You pay the 1.3 Trillion dollars then. You go mourn at the graves of 6000 servicemen who lost their lives to spread a TEMPORARY freedom in Iraq and Afganistan. Believe me, those countries will be in Civil war very soon. We are broke, why do you insist on perpetual wars and being the world police. Bring our troops home and then if anyone screws with us, bomb them out of existense. Simple.
Why do you insist that Israel cannot handle Iran all by itself? I stand with Israel, but standing with Israel means getting out of their way and let them take care of business.
Ron Paul is the only hope we have to turn back to the Constitution. No other candidate even comes close.
Report Post »PMAGONY
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:42am“Isolationist”? You obviously do not even bother to educate yourself, you just take what the media pumps out and assimilate it as truth. Ron Paul is a non-interventionist. Go do some due diligence before you continue to make yourself sound like an idiot.
Report Post »randy
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:46am@BADDPUPPY
Most of the US is not in favor of nation building when it comes to these islamic radicals…..
I believe most of us prefer, send the bombers in, turn iran into a parking lot and come home.
So no, I to am not in favor of nation building.
Ron Paul is an Idiot
Report Post »abandonship
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:47amRon Paul is not an Isolationist, he is a non-interventionist! Learn the difference before you start attacking him! Sure would be nice for people to know the facts before they fall hook, line, and sinker for the propaganda machine!!
Report Post »droc24
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:49amRon Paul has never said he wants Iran to have a nuclear weapon. In fact, he has stated just the opposite. What he says is by what right, of Natural Law or international Law, or any law you may choose, do we as the United States have the right or authority to tell them they cannot have one. Who died and made the U.S. the final arbiter of what a sovereign nation can do? What has our foreign policy taught Iran? North Korea has a nuke and we kiss their ass, Iraq didn’t and we went in and killed Saddam. Iran is only acted in a manner consistent with our foreign policy.
For a little historical context go back and look at the 1953 Iranian coup d’état where the CIA overthrew Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh so we could secure oil rights from the Shah. Maybe they are tired of us messing in their affairs. I can explain it to you but I can’t make you understand it.
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:58amWow, did you really read all that in my comment? Ok, i’ll try to keep this as short as possible. I know from history that you do not have a long term war in the middle east. The tribes will nickel and dime you to death. We should have gone over there done our business and left. I’m sick of rebuilding countries. We absolutely agree, there will be temporary peace with the tribes but they will revert back to the only thing they know and understand. It’s ignorant to think you will “teach” them democracy. My focus is the big picture and Israel being one of our greatest allies, we need to stand with them (that doesnt mean prop them up them or fight in their stead) as Iran does its sabre rattling. I hope that clears things up for you but I really have no Idea where you got all that off my last comment.
I laugh because your rant was caused by my identifying Ron as weak on national defence.
JLGunner
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:26pm@ randy careful, you’ve just unleashed the ron paul hounds…lol
Report Post »Libertarian
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:36pm@JLGunner,
Is China, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Germany, Chile, Canada, Mexico etc… all isolationists????
They certainly haven’t built 1/100th of the military bases on foreign soil than then we have! Our foreign policy is NOT typical, we are untypical. We have an aggressive dictatorial offense. That is fact.
Please define “isolationist foreign policy” so we can understand your definition.
Report Post »Libertarian
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:41pm@JLGunner,
Basically, what you are saying is 98% of the countries in this world are “isolationists” – our building of 1,077 bases worldwide is how other “governments should act”.
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:09pm@ lib How many of those countries have defended liberty? Believe me, I’m not thrilled with my tax dollars being shipped abroad. I’m even more pissed when Hillary Clinton says that our country will be defending the rights of the LBGT movement abroad as well. Hey how about this one; There are many homeless Americans due to the extreme weather this past season and our politicians raise money not to help these folks but to further their careers. I hope barack can sleep well in Hawaii knowing there are displaced families all over the counrty. That $4million would go a long way to make a families Christmas or holiday just a little better.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:36pm@JL Gunner
“How many of those countries have defended liberty?”
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
You think we went to war in the last 60 years to defend liberty?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Did you know Israel wants the USA to mind her own business? Israel believes in Self Reliance and Independence so leave Israel alone and don’t make Israel your scapegoat to go to war with Iran.
You cannot say what Ron Paul is weak on in foreign policy because Ron Paul is not weak on foreign policy at all. Ron is Constitutional.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:57pm> JL. Nowwwww look at what you’ve gone and done! Lol. Stay strong brother, don’t let the Thrifty-Libs try to overwhelm you. It’s good that you take the offense in making a case against Paul, ’cause sometimes the best defense is a good offense. Ha!
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 3:16pmYep and JL Gunner are most like Liberals…..
Intervention by Government whether intervening in Domestic issues or foreign Nations is to the LEFT of the Constitution. It’s MORE Government.
Yep and JL Gunner want MORE Government!!! They are LEFTIES!
Total==============================================Anarchy
Report Post »Gov ^
Constitution
^ ^
Intervention No-Intervention
Foreign Aid No foreign Aid
Domestic Welfare Self Reliance
World Government No World Government
Libertarian
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 3:50pm@YepImaConservative.
You can’t answer my questions either aye.
@JLGunner,
Are you proposing a world war against countries that have a theocratic, socialist or communist economic/political system in place? You seriously can’t be endorsing a war campaign against nearly every country in Africa, South America, Europe and Asia!
Is Russia acceptable liberty? Is Venezuela acceptable? Should we invade these countries? You rationalizing the irrational my friend.
God bless
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 20, 2011 at 1:38amJL, I could give a rats as* if Iran wants to be a democracy or not. We are a Republic not a democracy. Iran does not have the technology to do anything but make idle threats to everyone in the world. So what if they developed a nuke? Isreal has over 300, we have thousands. Iran has no standing army, air force or navy. What in the h e double hockey sticks can they really do? Get real. Iran taking on Isreal or the U.S. would be like a junior varsity high school football team taking on a couple of pro football teams. They would be stomped. If we continue on the path we are on, I guarantee you it will lead to all out nuclear war between the U.S., Russia and China.
Report Post »NoRoomForSocialismHere
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:23amHello Bill, you finally get something right for a change
Report Post »joe conservative
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:27amWhile Bill makes some valid points, I’d still take Ron Paul over what we have now. Everyone needs to keep in mind that any of the GOP candidates are better than the current President.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdTJR_OYnNg
lukerw
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:32am@JOE…
Report Post »Is that not like saying… my Career Goal to work in a Fast Food Place… and settle for whatever?
TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:35amYes, JOE; that is true. But I hope to get someone a bit more grounded than Ron baby.
Report Post »Timothy_Reid
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:48am@tron Such as……
Report Post »Jenny Lind
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:22amSorry, Paul fans, while I often disagree with O’Reilly, he is right on the money here.
Report Post »TheFastestCamper
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:53amLearn to think for yourself rather than let neocon progressives like Bill O’Reilly tell you what to think.
Even if you disagree with Ron Paul on Iran he is right on every AMERICAN issue. Iran is Israel’s issue and they pose a threat to Israel NOT America. Paul will restore the Constitution and restore OUR great country. He will get this economy back on track and give YOUR children a chance to be successful again. Not voting for him because of his stance on Iran is essentially putting Israel’s best interests above Americas.
Iran can’t touch us. If they ever got the means and Congress ACTUALLY declared war, they could be ‘wiped off the map’ in minutes.
Report Post »amtsoundsmith
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 3:54pmIt’s funny how “TheFastestCamper” instantly attacks you for have a different view on Ron’s stance. Ron Paul 101- Never, Ever, EVER, say you don’t agree with Ron! Come on Jenny! Think like them or you’re just a mindless robot following orders from the neocons!
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:20amI don’t always agreee with TED BAXTER, but he’s right on this one! Paul is misguided to say the least in this matter.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 1:32pmWell, TRONINTHEMORNING, how many times to you have to post the same sentiments in one article? Can’t think of anything original — like maybe some opposing viewpoints stated as facts?
Report Post »southernloyalty
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 4:50pmCome on, how many of ya’ll are willing to DIE, or send your children to DIE for Israel? I mean come on, why don‘t we just start another war which will be longer and tougher than the other 3 or 4 we’re already in. I mean we’re only financially BANKRUPT as a nation so yeah lets go fight another war on behalf of a country that does NOTHING for us. Let Israel fight its own battles. Orielly is a complete fool. Is he going to fight, is his children going to fight in a new war? Easy for him to say huh.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:20amThe man from Libtardia that thinks he is a Conservative? You mean that guy? Sorry Bill, you are a complete and utter fool.
Report Post »You will not be happy when Ron paul is your President I suppose…
JLGunner
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:29amI could never depend on Ron because he thinks its ok for Iran to have a nuke.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:37amYou dont think Israel can handle Iran? Wake up man. Israel can bomb them into the stone age before it’s ever developed. We dont need to do a thing about Iran. Israel is MORE than capable of doing what needs to be done. I stand with Israel. that means getting out of her way.
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:11pm@ pmag where did you see my support of these other nations having a bomb? I read my comment twice and , nope, not in there. You guys have got to calm down when someone doesn’t support your beloved ron paul. By the way, the bazooka remark was quite the stretch. Isreal is an ally. I didn’t need barack announcing to the world that “America believes Israel should pull it’s borders back to their pre 1968 exsistence”. I’m America and that was an irresposibly ignorant remark.
Relax, your guy is weak on national defence, bottom line.
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 12:23pmok, lets put it this way , ron paul is a non-interventionist….and he’s weak on national defence, hows that?
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:46pm@JL Gunner
“ok, lets put it this way , ron paul is a non-interventionist….and he’s weak on national defence, hows that?”
Wrong. State what he is weak on. You cannot because he is not.
Non-Intervention is not weak, it’s secure.
Overreaction and aggression as seen in Intervention is what is weak as such policy is irresponsible and irrational.
Good try but failure again JL Gunner.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 2:53pmCongratulations on a statement without name-calling.
Now — defense?
Are we safe with the border wide open?
Why didn’t Bush II close the border?
Why didn’t Obama close the border?
They BOTH want global government, that’s why!
Recognizing “progressive Republicans” is key to saving America.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 5:09pmThere are tons of enemies around Israel that has Nukes.. whats your point? Iran is by far no threat. There one of the weak. Even if they had one, there still no threat, because they know Israel will wipe them off the map before they do. Its common sense. You must not know that we send more foreign aid to Israels enemies. If your not for Paul’s foreign policy, than you want WWIII. PERIOD!
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 11:20amSo tell us something we don’t already know, Bill…………………
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 4:37pmWould love to see Sean Hannity face.
Report Post »Drudge Report
Paul leads in Iowa
December 18, 2011
Newt Gingrich’s campaign is rapidly imploding, and Ron Paul has now taken the lead in Iowa. He’s at 23% to 20% for Mitt Romney, 14% for Gingrich, 10% each for Rick Santorum, Michele Bachmann, and Rick Perry, 4% for Jon Huntsman, and 2% for Gary Johnson.
endgamer
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 7:33pmGotta love it! and the neocon warmongers for profit are having a fit!
Report Post »