Birther? Potential 2012 Contender Donald Trump Doubts Obama’s Citizenship
- Posted on March 17, 2011 at 10:57am by
Emily Esfahani Smith
- Print »
- Email »
Donald Trump, certified birther?
In a wide ranging interview on today’s Good Morning America, the real estate mogul raised some doubts about the president’s citizenship.
“Everybody that even gives a hint of being a birther … even a little bit of a hint, like, gee, you know, maybe, just maybe this much of a chance, they label them as an idiot. Let me tell you, I’m a really smart guy,” he said in the interview, which took place aboard his private plane, Trump Force One.
“I was a really good student at the best school in the country. The reason I have a little doubt, just a little, is because he grew up and nobody knew him.”
Trump went on to say, “When you interview people, if I ever got the nomination, if I ever decide to run, you may go back and interview people from my kindergarten. They’ll remember me. Nobody ever comes forward. Nobody knows who he is until later in his life. It’s very strange. The whole thing is very strange.”
Trump was equally forthcoming when he spoke about his fellow Republicans.
On Palin–she’s “an amazing woman,” and qualified to run for president:
She was the governor of a great state. She did fine as the governor. I think personally she made a tragic mistake when she left early … She did a good job as governor…And she’s a tough cookie. I think she’s more qualified than Barack Obama was when he became president.
On Boehner–man up!
I don’t like the crying…I do not like it. I don’t understand it. I really like him as a person. I think the crying is an emotional thing that frankly, probably makes him a very nice man. But you know, I don’t like to see it in a leader.
On Santorum–you’re a loser, dude.
He lost his Senate race. How do you lose a Senate race and then all of a sudden show up and start running for president? You know, he’s a nice guy … but I don’t think he has a chance.
So how seriously is Trump considering a 2012 presidential run of his own? Very seriously. Trump said that he is willing to put up $500-$600 million of his own money to fund his own campaign, provided that he is doing well. ”Part of the beauty of me,” he explained with a straight face, “is that I’m very rich.”
Trump also said that if he didn’t secure the Republican nomination, that he may consider running as an independent candidate.
Trumps plans to make a final decision “sometime prior to June” on whether he plans to run.




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (554)
Harvickfan29
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:17amI think Trump could get us out of a lot of the big messes we are in and put the United States back at the top in the world, and he wont apologize to other countries for us doing the things that we have done that made us the best country in the world unlike a certain idiot in the white house right now does.
Report Post »powhatan
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:17amTo be honest, none of us really know the truth here…Obama’s history is a mystery…very poor vetting process
Report Post »Uncle Crusty
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:17amtell it like it is Donald, but hey I want to know where u stand on a few things FIRST!
guns (2nd amendment) and abortion and entitlements…give me the right answers there and maybe you get a vote from me??
Report Post »FrankSpeak
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:16amMost likely won’t win, but he’ll be good to bring more non-political people into the conservative cause.
Report Post »stifroc
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:16amWith the election of P. BO all arguments and concerns about a person’s “qualifications” to run for president went right out the window.
All you need to know to be president is marketing.
Report Post »All you need to do once you get to the Oval Office is blame your predecessor and party.
TSUNAMI-22
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:16amI don‘t care for Trump’s personality, but his business acumen is in the right place. This doesn’t mean I will vote for him for president. I think the more pressing issue is with Islamic extremism and in this area I feel someone like Alan West would be more suited. If we can’t find a leader to squash this warped theology, there will be NO USA for someone like Trump to be successful within.
As far as the birther mentality goes, I think the BIGGEST proponent of it is due to Obama himself. He’s taken active steps to keep things perpetual. Obama could put the birther idea to rest permanently if he wanted to……….but evidently he is reluctant to expose himself.
Personally, I’d like to see a West / Bachman ticket.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 3:32pmOne thing that always gets me when talking about candidates is the comment “I won’t vote for him/her.” Really? Maybe in the primaries, sure. By all means, vote for who you think will be the best. But what about the general election? It will be somebody against Obama. What will you do? Vote Obama? Personally, I will vote the somebody ticket, I do not care if it is McCain or Romney. Hell, at this point I would vote for Hillary Clinton if she turned Republican and won the primary…I guess your only choice is not to vote, and I suppose that decision depends on how bad you want Obama out! :-)
Report Post »downbad
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 4:54pmTsunami, with islam extremism people often point to “they hate our freedom” as the cause and suicide bombs as the effect. They’ve got the effect right, but they fail to listen to the terrorists words when it comes to the cause. If you listen, it is almost always because of our military presence in the region. How would you feel with a foreign country in yours? Don’t get me wrong, i support our troops fully, but you have to ask the question why are we there? I used to be 100% for the war but have since educated myself. We can all agree that we need to be energy independant and that we are over there protecting the west’s oil interest. By drilling here, we can do both and not give the terrorists a reason to hate us. They are a very angry minority that the rest of the muslims gravitate to because they see the west proping up dictators that oppress them.
Troll, if we get McCain2 i will vote for Obama, because we will deserve what ever we get and he will bring it sooner. Just look at how many people have awakened after his 1st term, that wouldn’t have happend with McCain.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 5:15pmDownbad, I do agree 100% with that! McCain would have been infinity worse because it would have been progressive business as usual. Everyone would have slept through it as we have the last 2 decades. Romney is just as bad…
But I cannot let Obama have another term. His plans would come to fruition. We need to disrupt this administration no matter what the cost. If we do not…This country is finished…
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 2:44am@ DOWNBAD
The reasons terrorist hate doesn’t concern me. Those people have been troublemakers for the better part of recorded history. I’m tired of the “Muslim this”, and “Muslim that”…..and the reason they hate us is because……..
As far as I’m concerned they can all be exterminated, either by their own actions or the actions of others defending themselves.
They will always have an axe to grind. I often think how different their countries might look if they exerted as much energy trying to create something instead of always trying to blow something up in the name of Mohammed.
Report Post »wildjoker5
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:16amTrump is more of a leader than Obama. Can‘t wait to see more picks of Obama’s next coming vacation and the world burns.
Trump will not be obligated to any special interest group or Unions. He would probably take responsibility for the US and run it like a business to start making it some revinue. And if you think Trump is arrogant, you haven’t been watching Obama. I have yet to see Obamas eyes when he gives a speach, he has his nose so far to the sky, the telepromters must be on the celing.
Report Post »G.W. Dobbs
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:15amTrump is a GREAT MAN and has the Force of Character that will make him an out standing President. It is now TIME, Mr. Trump. Thank you for loving our Country and wanting to RESTORE it. I am praying that God guides you and protects you and shows you His Favor.
Report Post »bobodu
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:26amSo…you don’t think people were praying to the same God that Obama would get elected?
Report Post »Funny how the truth works, ain’t it Kiddo?
fatjack
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 3:16pmHow can anyone get all giddied up with The Donald while body slamming Newt past? The Donald has had (owned) how many slims? Oh my bad, I guess prenuptial agreements is the difference.
Report Post »brado9505
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 7:04pmI hope he runs. He’s the best out there.
Report Post »STF1961
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:14amLet Mr Trump put his money behind an ALAN WEST/SARAH PALIN Ticket… Yaaaa that’s the ticket! : )
Report Post »NickDeringer
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:14amTrump is working hard to get Professor O’Barry re-elected. If Trump goes third party start booking O‘Barry’s victory party.
Report Post »selfgov1st
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 2:12pmIt is the best chance Obama has for re-election.
Report Post »novelator
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 8:51amOh, please, just keep repeating the propaganda: no third party. You‘re both making Soros’s heart sing: Can’t win; hand Obama the election; blah, blah, blah. Oh, no, we the People have no choices but Republican or Democrat; oh, no, we the People could never elect an independent; oh, no, the Republican party can’t beat the Whigs (ah, but they did, didn’t they, way back when). Take a look at your history. Americans can damn well do anything they please, as long as they remember that they can. It‘s doubting Thomas’s like you two that keep returning Soros’s hand-picked candidates to Congress and the White House while keeping that old Nazi-sympathizer laughing at us all.
Grow a pair, a spine, and take a good look at your government. Take a good look at both parties and tell me, how are they all that different? One seems to be a bit slower about pushing the Progressive agenda than the other one, but that’s it, that’s the only difference.
Man, if we don’t all wake up here and soon, we’ll see our kids into slavery, just because we forgot who we are and what we’re capable of doing, when the going gets tough.
Good thing our Forefathers didn’t fall for the Tory propaganda, huh?
Report Post »rodamaa
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:13amObama/Biden! Are you kidding
Report Post »stifroc
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:12amHe brings valid points.
Report Post »He asks some interesting questions.
I like that. Now lets see if the media can paint him as a blithering idiot for asking such questions or if they look the other way and ignore him.
clemV
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:12amOne of the main reasons I stopped watching Beck was because of his stance on the birther issue and more importantly,possibly, the birthers themselves.
Beck doesn’t sway from the Official Story on ANYTHING. As far as Trump is concerned; he’s another loser wannabe politician looking for power and money. Same old elites vying for the same old power. Nothing new here..
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:21amHow would you know if Beck never swayed from the official story on anything. You just admitted you stopped watching him.
BTW, you’re wrong in your first assertion.
Report Post »clemV
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:34amI watched religiously for 3+ years, starting way back on when he was on CNN. It took me 3 years to come to this conclusion after watching nothing but Beck and Fox for my news.
When I started doing my own research on 911 and came to my own serious conclusions; Beck decides to go on the air against ‘truthers’. He had on a couple of ‘experts’ back in the day and just rail-roaded them, wasn’t fair.
He did the same with the ‘birther’ thing; as he is doing now through this propaganda machine called ‘the blaze’. There‘s more than enough evidence to suggest there’s a cover up of the birther issue.
How about his stance on Debra Medina – the one true Libertarian candidate for the TX governorship last go around? Completely railroaded. If you’re not from TX, you may not know who I’m talking about.
How about his stance on Ron Paul? The one true libertarian LEADER who can really turn this country around with common sense laws, fiscal spending and keeping our own military fingers to ourselves.
Beck doesn’t support true freedom, he railroads it. He has an agenda just like every single other media outlet on cable.
We may agree to disagree now, but in due time with your own honest questions I think you may see it my way (after a few YEARS) of watching..
Sicerely,
FormerBeckite
Report Post »sophiepuggle
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 2:15pmNo one spends almost $2 million to prevent the release of a birth certificate. Not only has he not produced it but he also has not produced medical records or college transcripts. Nothing to hide? These actions make people wonder- no matter how absurd
Report Post »selfgov1st
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 2:23pmCLEMV, do you only watch shows when you agree with them 100% of the time? I’ve disagreed with several things that Glenn Beck has said, both on TV and on the radio, but I don’t watch him because I agree with him. I watch because he has a somewhat fresh perspective and stimulates me to think critically.
Is he stubborn because he hasn’t come around to your point of view?
Report Post »exdem
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 3:48pm@CLEMV
Report Post »Doesnt Trump already have power and money?? I see him as a capitalist who would run the country like a business and would stand strong against our enemies. No apologies from Trump to Arab nations either. He has lived through the ridiculous regulations our gov imposes on business and will hopefully get rid of some of them.
The thing that really bothers me is his donations to Rahm Emanuel who is as corupt as Obamao. But listening to his views on matters concerning our country is like conservative porn to me. Can’t get enough!
He makes no bones on his feelings towards Hussein Obama and the direction he would take us in. If no one else like Cain or West, Rubio or Palin run and Trump does- I will vote for him. My dog could do a better job than Obama.
Lucy Larue
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 3:52pmCLEMV,
SELFGOV1ST said it best in his reply to you.
He does have a different perspective.
Look at all the trouble Beck and his staff face EVERY DAY because they try to get to the TRUTH of what they DO decide to tackle. Can you imagine what would happen if Beck’s show went all crazy over the birth certificate?!
I’ve heard Beck say a number of times that this Republic faces bigger issues, and it does.
Report Post »Tackling the birth certificate and other unreleased records would only ADD to the nation’s woes right now.
There are others working on records issue.
downbad
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 4:23pmCLEMV, i’m a former Beckite aswell (same timeframe). I couldn’t agree with you more. Once people actually do as Beck says and “do their own research” they’ll come to the same conclusion. He’s mostly right on fiscal issues, but with military and birther(read personal records) he has and agenda. Vote for a true conservative who’s past ACTIONS and WORDS back him up RON PAUL 2012.
Report Post »downbad
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 4:41pmEXDEM, from your name I gather that you voted for Obama last go around. How did his words and what he said hold up? Yet, now you put the same trust into Trumps words. He’s of the same cloth as the rest of the “elites” in washington. Please people, lets not make the same mistakes that we have for the past 30 years.
Report Post »exdem
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 4:51pm@DOWNBAD
Report Post »I did not vote for Obama. His Joe the plumber comment made the hair stand up on the back of my neck. He is a progressive which is why I left the dems behind. I was a blue dog democrat now registered as an independant and voting repub. I voted for McCain because he had Palin on the ticket and I loved what she had to say.
anamandy
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:21amClem, maybe you didn’t watch the video but Trump did say he was willing to use 600 mil of his own money to run. So where did you get the idea that this multi-billionaire wants to become president to make money?
Report Post »Cabo King
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:11amhe wouldnt make a good president, but he has forgotten ore than baracus obamacus ever has known
Report Post »saneasylum
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:10amHe‘s as qualified as O’Bama to be president, pretty sad……….
Report Post »BabkaKing
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 9:16pmComparing Obama‘s leadership to Trump’s success is a joke! Trump will eat him for lunch based on the facts.
Report Post »bandi9
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:10ami am more impressed every time i see an interview of him. starting to get on the Trump bandwagon, or at least following behind it for now.
Report Post »clemV
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:18amKeep hopping on the bandwagons that are given to you to choose from. I‘m sure you’ll end up with liberty in at least one of those wagons.
Get real people; all the options we have to vote for are engineered by the same progressives we all dislike so much.
They’re all cut from the same cloth. When are we going to take a page from the rest of the world and throw ALL OF THESE BUMS OUT? McCain, Palin, Bachmann, pfffftttt…. there’s no REAL choice anymore.
Report Post »ProgressiveLiberalMarine
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:25amIt’s funny, I agree that all of the names you mentioned aren’t real choices… mostly because they would all be terrible.
Report Post »selfgov1st
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 1:51pmI am unimpressed by words. Barack Obama’s words were actually quite nice during the election, but he hasn’t governed by them. Look at Trumps history…his record. What do his actions say he really believes? Does he always tell the truth (would give his words some meaning)? Who has he donated money to? That means a lot more than knowing the right things to say in interviews.
Report Post »selfgov1st
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 2:04pmI agree with what I hope is your main point CLEMV, but I believe you take it too far. Yes, we cannot trust people like Romney and McCain as they will say anything to satisfy conservatives and win elections, while at the same time governing to the left (McCain/Feingold, Romneycare etc).
However, there are also true conservatives in Washington. The difficulty is discerning who is who. I believe one of the best indicators of a true conservative is the level of vitriol thrown at them by the left and the the standoffish (and sometimes even negative) relationship with the “Republican” establishment. People like Bachman, Demint, Palin, Paul are not popular on the Left or in the Republican establishment (even though they are popular amonst the general population)…which makes me think they are some of the few who actually believe what they say. Combine the attacks made agains them with their records and I believe there are some who we can safely elect as conservatives. Now, how do we make sure one of these few is our Republican nominee?
Report Post »Amazingoly
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:10amWe do too, Donald!
Report Post »150 million 2012 voters
REETZBEE
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:09amI’d rather have Trump than Obama and his Czars any day.
Report Post »ChristAllen
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 6:41pmThe first President who appointed ‘czars’ was Ronald Reagan. It‘s just a term meaning that they’re in charge of drafting bits of policy under the direction of the president. That word has been demonized to a ridiculous extent.
Besides, if you were really anti-communist, you’d be all for Czars.
Report Post »mattwakulik
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:09amthese people need to stop this birther crap! there is nothing anyone can do even if this crazy conspiracy is true! let it go. it just makes you look crazy and does not benefit you at all.
Report Post »clemV
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:19amJust like our Founding Fathers couldn’t do anything about being taxed without representation… right…
Report Post »G.W. Dobbs
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:22amI will NOT let the “birther thing go”. This is a CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION which WILL be addressed sooner or later. It MUST be. All the information we have, including Obama’s OWN words “I was born in Kenya” makes CITIZENSHIP of PRESIDENCY of paramont importance. WHY did the Congress let it get this far? MONEY, as always and to hell with te Constitution, huh, Biden?
Report Post »ProgressiveLiberalMarine
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:24amBirther- Theory
Tax without Rep- Truth
Yep, exactly the same.
Report Post »Lucy Larue
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:25amMATTWAKULUK,
Report Post »Who are “These People”?
Trump is correct. Anyone with common sense would wonder why a sitting President would spend millions to keep his records sealed. It’s not just the birth certificate. The “Birther” term was born in lefty land to divert.
Am I a “BIRTHER”? No…,no more than Donald Trump.
chickenlittle
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:29amIt may be a conspiracy, but it ain’t crazy. There’s just something way off when the first Executive Order by our new president is to block any access to his private records. If someone applied to a job with the kind of background Obama provides, they wouldn’t get clearance to the mailroom.
Report Post »jeffile
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:33amThe issue of Obama’s birth should have been settled long ago. McCain ran into the same problem as he was born in the Panama Canal Zone and it was quickly resolved. The evidence is underwhelming of Obama’s US citizenship and should be immediately resolved. It‘s too bad so many people are trying to prove they aren’t racist by voting for a black man.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:40amI don’t think people should NOT talk about the birth certificate out of fear for how it will be viewed. The Republicans spend too much time worrying about how the left (therefore the media) will view them as it is. They can’t even put their foot down on spending for fear of a government shutdown and how they will be viewed if it happens. Question with boldness and dont worry what your enemies say, they are going to hate you no matter what you say anyway.
Report Post »chickenlittle
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:46am@Jeffile… I agree, it should have been put to rest a long time ago… so why wasn’t it? As you say, McCain’s was resolved… but only because he released all his records. Obama has gone to great lengths NOT to. Have the governor of HI hold up a piece of paper (the same one as is issued for foreign born “citizens” by the way) and then legally shut him down? Obama seems to scoff at a lot of “laws” in this country… he has also been caught not living up to his “promises”… in an issue as big as this, I would tend to believe there’s a lot of fire behind all this smoke.
Report Post »FGWinFLA
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:47amI fully do not understand. There is QUESTION as to this man’s (obummer) nationality, religion & ethics. Why is there not an inquiry of some sort by congress, the people or even some news program (geraldo comes to mind…). It’s a REQUIREMENT to be president & he has NOT complied. Somebody help me out. I really don’t understand. Hell, I‘d lead the inquiry if they’d let me.
Report Post »Just a little concern from yer ‘ol uncle Frank…
Deanna in Missouri
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:55amJust let it go? Boy I guess you give up easy. I want to know and I cannot believe no one is doing something about it. Why won’t he show it?
Report Post »lillianrose
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 12:15pm@G.W. Dobbs- he also let it slip- his muslim faith.
Report Post »blackcatrun
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 12:19pmMaybe someone wants to explian why he had a legal name change to Barrack obama from barry sorento? It’s not like that name change is a deep dark secret. In fact thats really easy to find out about. I want to know why they would fake a birth record in a newspaper when it’s commen knowlage that the guy had a name change. It all is kinda odd.
Report Post »LoneStarGigger
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:25pmIt’s hard to just “let it go” when his own WIFE said Kenya was Barrack’s “home country”…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLzJz2A2N1c
Then the Freudian slip with Stephanopolous…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKGdkqfBICw
Report Post »novelator
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 8:29amI wouldn’t let the “birther” thing go. The biggest indication of how much of our Congress Soros now owns lies in the fact that no one in Congress, no one among the latest crop of Republican saviors even, is asking that the so-called “leader” of the “free” world produce his records.
Both parties in Congress have been and are letting Obama skate on this issue, something even the Progressive McCain wasn’t allowed. Soros and his gang of global progressive thugs must own most of our Congress or have just frightened them to death. Either way, we the People lose.
And that doesn’t begin to address impeachable offenses, or treasonous behavior. I wonder how many members of Congress are complicit in that.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:09amDonnie …….
Report Post »Have a question for ya.
If you are going to run as a Conservative / Republican / Tea Party candidate can’t wait for you to throw your wig into the ring. ,If you are going to be a Good Ol Boy Republican, stay home, create jobs, create golf courses, do another show.
selfgov1st
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 1:44pmI don’t care what he runs as, I care how he governs. Anybody can say anything when running for office…doesn’t mean anything nowadays.
Report Post »bullcrapbuster
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 8:03pmTrump is wishy washy. He would infuriate the conservatives. Anti traditional marriage,don’t givbea crap on abortion,suck up to anyone to further his personal agenda. A potential perverbial political prostitute. Too much bullcrap on Trump. Folks in love with themselves have very little competition. Trump as president would be a victory for the left.
Report Post »mrsmileyface
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:08amLets wait and see if hes serious. Hopefully he wont choose a running mate like Stockdale.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:07amTrump would be far superior to Obama, at least he’s actually a producer and job creator.
Report Post »Downside: I would like a president that didn’t star on a reality TV show.
Upside: Hottest first lady of all time.
TERMLIMITSNOW
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:40amHotter than Jackie O? I guess they are two different kinds of hot. Jackie was classy hot, Mrs T is plastic hot.
Report Post »wildjoker5
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:48amAnd a good looking first daughter. Hopefully we wouldn’t have to worry about what kind of dog he would get.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 1:07pmBlackieO
Report Post »:-) that’s pretty funny.
selfgov1st
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 1:46pmeighty percent of the country would be better than Obama, but I don’t think that should be our measuring stick for Repubilican nominees.
exdem
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 3:01pm@Gonzo
Report Post »My Blackie O comment was deleted but yours is there. Was with the Blaze lately???
glennrocks
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:07amI really like the things Trump is saying. Is he the one that could save us? He is for capitalism. He is well known. But is he just a distraction? I don’t know , what do you guys think? Anybody is better than what we have now.
Report Post »sissykatz
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:39amWell I had never considered it much until now. He is a wonderful business man,doesn’t mind hurting anyone feeling so we would not have to worry about him being pc, I don’t think he would run but once, I know he would not be afraid of foreign affairs, he deals with most of them anyway, We would not have to worry about him being obligated to anyone and doing favors for them.He knows how to make decisions and doesn’t have to research it for months as does Obammy,we would always know what he is thinking because he will tell us.He certainly believes in capitalism,he is a conservative, would do whatever for small businesses, He would not even have to use Airforce one,he has his own.He does know how to wheel and deal and barter. One thing he said I was impressed with was if he went to war he would have the country we were fighting in to pay for it with oil or money so it would not be our burden. He is very arrogant but we are certainly used to that and he has more of a reason to be than Obama because he has accomplished something.I keep putting more and more things in the plus column for him.
Report Post »selfgov1st
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 12:57pmFirst, I don’t trust Donald Trump as a conservative. I believe he is an opportunist, especially when you consider his political donations. I don’t think a true conservative or libertarian could stomach donating money to liberal progressives such as Rahm Emmanuel. I’m afraid he could easily be a Nixon…conservative in lip service, but someone who increased the size of government the most of any Republican President that I can think of. We need a true conservative running as the Republican Nominee.
Also, I’ve heard several people say they like the idea of Trump because he will run the USA as a business. That sounds great, but that’s not the role of the US government. The role of the US government is to protect the constitution. Businesses don’t have individual liberty. As an employee, I do what my boss tells me. In reality, the last thing we want is our President treating the USA as if he is the CEO of a business. IF, people mean that he will de-regulate the economy, promote free market policies, lower tax burdens, reduce expenditures, etc. because he knows that the USA needs a balanced budget and businesses need freedom to thrive, then I’m all for that, but we need to better define what we mean when we say he would run the country as a business.
Thirdly, his running as a third party candidate would be a disasterous decision and is more evidence that he’s not a true conservative, but an opportunist. He knows he would never win as a third party candidate. Running as a 3rd party candidate would possibly help his ego and fame (personal gain/opportunist), but could only result in the re-election of Barack Obama (terrible for the country and conservative values), just as Perot paved the way for two terms of Bill Clinton. If he really believed in conservative values, I don’t believe he would even consider a 3rd party run.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 3:19pmWow! Just wow to sissykatz and selfgov1st!
You two have perfectly described both sides of the argument with Trump! I agree with both of you, and I am leaning towards endorsing Trump. Is he a teaparty ideal candidate? Nope. Is he a RINO? I dont think so because I dont think he is “political.” I think he is self-serving, but I also believe he has the country’s best interest at heart here. He certainly is not running (if he runs, but I am pretty certain he will) for money or power. I think the potential is there for him to be a Nixon, to expand the government, to be the worst thing possible…But that potential is there with anyone, we cannot know what anyone will do once in power…I tend to believe Trump is more for a smaller, streamlined, efficient government. I do not trust Trump as far as I can spit, he is a business man and again, he is self-serving. But the only (potential) candidates I would trust are Palin and Huckabee simply because they are Christians and will not knowingly lie. But maybe it is naive to want the ideal tea party type in office. Maybe we need someone who knows how to wield and use power, how to play the DC game, how to deal with other countries…I cannot think of anyone more suited in this aspect than Trump…
I am cautious…I want to hear more of what he has to say…But I think I would overlook my “ideals” in favor of someone who can get elected and who can make a difference.
Report Post »OneBuckeye
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 3:58pmWho better to tell Obama, your fired!
As far as Obama, Born in Hawaii? Maybe, but the real question is why does he keep the birth certificate a secret? It could be he doesn’t want anyone to see the section on race! Did his mother check the Caucasian box?
If she did, then he is not the first black president….now that would hurt!
Report Post »downbad
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 4:04pmDonald Trump’s agent is Rahm Emanuels brother. He donated to Rahms campaign because he was doing a “favor” for his agent not because he believed in his political views. Is this someone you want to be our president?(more of the same shxt) He has also gone bankrupt numerous times, but was “too big to fail” because the banks that lent him the money would go under too. So, they lent him more money! Is this someone you want to be our president?(more of the same shxt) If Trump were president, I can garauntee he would make legislation benefiting his business cronies at the expense of the people. Is this someone you want to be our president?(more of the same shxt) I think you get my drift… Vote Ron Paul 2012, if you think you don’t agree with him on the issues, I beg you to atleast let him describe them from his own mouth and not the media spin. He may just change your mind or reinforce your own beliefs.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 4:18pmRon Paul is at the top of my list…I actually prefer Palin…But neither have a hope in hell of winning. Like it or not it will be the independents that carry the next election.
Report Post »downbad
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 4:27pmTrollTrainer, its that exact mindset that has derailed this country. What makes you think Paul has no chance in hell of winning, because the media says so? They constantly try to diminish our numbers, but they are there.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 4:39pmdownbad, read my post further down on page 1 where I reply to the comment “I wouldn’t vote for him…”
It is like this my friend, I will vote in my state’s primary and I will vote my conscience. I will take stock of the candidates running and I will vote for the one I think is best. I am not making any decisions right this minute, but as I said, Palin is top of the list and I like Ron Paul. I also like Huckabee, in fact, on the political compass he falls closest to my personal ideals. I will listen to Trump, research his record, and make my decision about him apart from the media and forum noise.
But that is the primaries.
In the general election I am voting Republican. I am always open to a respectable democratic candidate (for any office) but I have yet to find one. :-) What other choice is there? 3rd party candidate? Forget it. If Trump runs 3rd party and Romney is the Republican candidate then I vote Romney, even though I hate him. If Palin is the Republican candidate then I enthusiastically vote Palin and pray like hell….If Paul is the Republican candidate then I am happy to vote for him. This is just life. Derailed the country? Save it friend…There is a such thing as reality…
Report Post »downbad
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 4:56pmI guess sacrificing your personal beliefs and values is something you can do, not me.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 5:04pmWho said anything about sacrificing personal beliefs and values? I take it you are a libertarian? I am a closet libertarian myself, libertarians are mostly right on the issues…Except maybe abortion. The government does have the right to make murder illegal…But anyway, I respect libertarian ideals. The only problem with libertarians is they are rather naive about how the real world works. There are wolves and the sheep do need protected from them…
All that aside, the only compromise I make is by not throwing my vote away needlessly. If you are as far right as I am you will never see a candidate you like in office. Everything is a compromise. It will always be the less of two evils. Just the way it is. I am too old to be sanctimonious about this, my life goes on the same no matter who is in office. They take more and more freedoms away and we learn to get by without them. Work hard, pay the taxes, pray to God, and do the best we can. That is all any of us can really do.
Just vote.
Report Post »downbad
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 5:12pm“I vote Romney, even though I hate him.”
There ya go. By the way, im 22 so I guess I have a longer life to fight for than you.
Report Post »downbad
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 5:22pmOne more thing (dont think i’m attacking you personally, only trying to make a point) for someone who doesnt believe in abortion, you sure dont care much for your progeny’s future if you are willing to sacrifice their freedoms. You said they slowly take away our freedoms and we should just adjust and live with it.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 5:35pmdownbad writes:
“One more thing (dont think i’m attacking you personally, only trying to make a point) for someone who doesnt believe in abortion, you sure dont care much for your progeny’s future if you are willing to sacrifice their freedoms. You said they slowly take away our freedoms and we should just adjust and live with it.”
——————————————————————
Woah Hoss, you go WAY too far! You have absolutely NO right to say that. I understand you are idealistic, but surely you realize that in the case of Romney running as the Republican candidate against Trump as a third party…Trump stands no chance, he only serves to split the vote. In fact, I could make the case that it would by YOU who is throwing away your children’s future by not doing EVERYTHING in your power to get Obama out!
I will not take your comment personally, I really do understand where you are coming from…Believe it or not…I just wish you would go back and read the things I have written a little more carefully. You are trying to make me the enemy when I am not.
Report Post »novelator
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 7:37amSelfgov1st–I wouldn’t be so quick to discount a third party candidate. Please show me what the latest crop of Republican saviors have done in the two and a half months since they’ve taken office. From where I sit, a third party is looking real good to me right now. And I am so not alone in this.
Here’s something to chew on: How would you defuse, demoralize and destroy a Tea Party? If I owned just enough Republicans in Congress, I’d make sure they tarnished the image of Conservative or Tea Party candidates by wholly disappointing their supporters over the next couple of legislative sessions. And all the while I’d keep my propaganda subtly focused on this: no third party. A third party can’t win; a third party will just get Obama re-elected; blah, blah, blah. I’d make sure between my ownership of Congress and my subtle propaganda of no third party that the People felt they had no choices left but to vote for my hand-picked candidates, like an Obama, a Romney or a McCain.
More elections are stolen by limiting the choice of candidates than any fraudulent registration of the dead (which is the cover crime for the bigger crime, by the way). Oh, I could do so much if I owned a few Republicans, like Boehner, and I had the money of a Soros. I could own this country.
As for Trump, I would cast a vote for him before I will ever cast a vote for a Progressive like Romney or Obama.
When the only difference between members of two political parties is the letter after their last name, you don’t have a two-party system. So, in calling for a third party, I’m really advocating a return to a true two-party system, not this RINO and DEM Progressive dog and pony show that passes for political theater in this country these days.
No wonder Soros laughs at us all–we apparently can‘t tell a RINO from a DEM and we apparently don’t know that just because the propaganda says we have no choices doesn‘t mean we don’t have any choices. We all have to grow a pair or a spine or maybe both and admit that both so-called parties in this country are owned by interests that would love to see that threat known as the Tea Party dead in the water so they can continue play-acting on the political stage while destroying it behind the scenes.
Yeah, I’d take a Trump over any other candidate right now. You bet.
Report Post »Oil_Robb
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 7:39amTrump is dumber than dirt…..he made a comment that he was going to tell the Arabs to lower the price of oil….I do like the fact that Independants will be swayed over and that he has a large audience and is not afraid to put his foot in his mouth saying what GOP want to say and would be precieved as not PC
Report Post »vernius
Posted on March 19, 2011 at 1:57amI agree with SISSYKATZ. I’ve always been fascinated with Trump. He is arrogant…but he’s successful enough to not be judged too harshly. What ticks most of us off…is the arrogance of Obummer who is a well spoken fraud in a nice suit….along with his progressives, who truly DO live in a bubble. They don’t know…or perhaps just don’t care, what real down to earth people feel and think, or how they really live day to day. They did however, get a taste of that in the last election. I am a proud member of a Tea Party, and until I knew Obummer was running for the presidency, I never investigated any politician…protested at any gathering or joined a political movement. I’d bet the vast majority of members across this country were in the same boat. I had learned all about Obummer’s upbringing and his “mysterious” background, his communist and socialist friends, and his questionable rise to fame, long before the election that made him president. It was so very frustrating to see how the media and the American people ignored all that information. Now they’ve found out a lot of that info, and regret their decision. That is why we’re reading this blog and commenting here. Regardless of our political leanings…we’re all interested in our own personal beliefs and hope for his ouster or, God forbid, his reelection. Yeah….regarding Trump….I agree with SISSYKATZ.
Report Post »The Wizard
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 4:49pmTrump tells it like it is; a trait that has been absent in Washington since Reagan. I‘m not sayin he’s Reagan, but he understands the problem and knows what the solution is. Let’s give him a chance; at least he’s not a Muslim Cronie. Let him speak, compare him to others like Allen West and Tim Pawlenty etc…
Report Post »One thing for sure; Romney with Romney-Care, Huckabee and the other False-Conservatives are “old meat” RINOS and will not be able to, or willing to do what is necessary
bobodu
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:06amPalin/Trump !!!
That the best you got???? LOL LOL LOL
Whew…..
Report Post »chickenbig
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 11:45pm@bobodu;
Report Post »Hey Bobdoodoo;
You laugh at Palin & Trump ? You are probably one of the many jackasses that put the current POTUS in office…And you laugh, you have nerve.
ProgressiveLiberalMarine
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:05amDid an amazing job as governor! Before quitting to make money on the book circuit and make a reality show. Maybe if she went on a channel regularly other than Fox News and released statements on a website other than Twitter she might be taken more seriously.
Oh, and many voters would vote based on looks.
ProgressiveLiberalMarine
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:07amMy bad, she only uses Twitter to link to the statements she posts… on Facebook.
Report Post »Rearden Steel
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:09amHow many people vote based on the color of someone’s skin?
bandi9
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:11ami would imagine the marine corps is ashamed of you, and would enjoy beating you with a sock full of soap
ProgressiveLiberalMarine
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:12amNot saying it’s right, but it happens.
Report Post »ProgressiveLiberalMarine
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:15amNope, because the Marines I know don‘t care about my beliefs as long as I don’t try and push them on my co-workers. In fact, I have good debates with many of them all the time.
Report Post »bobodu
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:22amThe real question would be “How many people vote for anything but another Bush?”.
Report Post »I just don’t know why you never are able to ask that? I listen to conservative talk for hours every day and no one has ever asked that question…they always play the race card. Beck included.
jeffile
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:24amHow many people vote based on the color of someone’s skin?
Obviously, based upon the last presidential election, many do.
Report Post »wildjoker5
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:24am@Rearden Steel
About 12% of the vote for Obama was 99% racially motivated. And still, there is about 90% approval among that 12% demographic.
Report Post »wildjoker5
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:29am@bobodu
Report Post »They bring it up when there is a true question about it like 90% of Blacks still approve what Obama is doing while 40% of everone else approves. Seems pretty racial to me. More so than the way liberals try to claim Scott Walker is Racist or destroying civil rights in WI. Have you seen the protesters? They are 98% white, if he is only hurting the minorities, where are they? Fabricated race card pull from liberals like Jackson, or factual, numbers driven race card?
ProgressiveLiberalMarine
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:33am@WILDJOKER
I voted for him, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that I would give him an approval.
Report Post »NUTHRDUMBCONSERVATIVE
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:37amWow hate is a powerful emotion and liberals live on it. The question is between Palin and Trump which one do you hate more? Non-Ivy League educated, self-confident, self-sufficient and successful governor or over confident, extremely successful business mogul? Unfortunately, hate gets less votes than hope.
By the way, ProgressiveLiberalMarine, if you’re the one are you the guy Murtha was talking about?
On Trump, this is another example of him opening his mouth on something he should leave alone. I keep waiting for someone to turn the birther charge the right way: It is no surprise that a single communist America hating mother would not make sure that when she ran home to mommy to have her baby
ProgressiveLiberalMarine
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:46amI would like to think I don’t “Live on hate”. I don’t hate Palin, Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, or any of that crowd… I just really don’t like them.
Report Post »exdem
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:47am@PROGLIEMORON
Report Post »BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
I love that Sarah gets under your skin!!!
You progressive morons crack me up. You put up all these people to demonize in hopes it distracts focus from the fact that Hussein is the worst President ever. Let’s see … we have had Sarah of course, Chamber of Commerce,Evil banks, corrupt Wall Street, greedy corporations, Rebuplicans, TEA Party, Beck, Boehner, Bachmann, Walker and now its the KOCH brothers. You are so laughable!!
wildjoker5
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:51am@ProgressiveLiberalMarine
Now did I say EVERYONE that voted for him still give him approval?
Report Post »ProgressiveLiberalMarine
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:51amOur Koch Brothers is your Soros. It’s pretty much the exact same think.
If 1/2 term Gov. Palin got under my skin I would be pissed whenever I saw her, I don’t get pissed, I mostly just laugh.
Report Post »exdem
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:54amOh he’s a troll!! And scum for pretending to be a marine. He says he wouldnt push his beliefs on his co workers and yet spends alot of time trying to do just that on the Blaze.
Report Post »What Marine calls his fellow marines his co workers?
Hes a media matters plant.
ProgressiveLiberalMarine
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:59am@JOKER
No, and I wasn’t trying to imply that you were saying that.
Report Post »ProgressiveLiberalMarine
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 12:03pmAgain, I am a Marine and have been for over three years and I said co-workers because I would be wrong to say fellow Marines because I work with many civilians as well as Marines.
I’m not trying to push my views on you, I’m mostly commenting.
Report Post »exdem
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 12:20pmPROSTATELICMORON
Report Post »Difference between Soros and Koch Brothers.
Soros= collaspes economies, buys media to create propaganda
Koch- owns corporations that provide jobs and services
mill
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 12:36pmTOO TRUE!! Millions of uninformed twits voted for obama because of the color of his skin. not his qualifications, background etc…THE COLOR OF HIS FREAKIN SKIN..totally disgusting. AND the sad part is they will do it again in 2012
BetterDays
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 12:52pmPROGRESSIVELIBERALMARINE:
More than likely MERCHANT MARINE than a beach grinder!
If you don’t like the Obamanation vote him out, but then whom would you vote for Marx, Alyanski, Trotski, or someone else who will promise you everything and in the end pick up his BRASS over your cold stiffining corpse?
You defend the indefensible
Report Post »Your hand out for the unobtainable
Your methods despicable and destainable
Your ends containable
UTOPIA DOES NOT EXIST, DUE TO HUMANITY!
progressiveslayer
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 3:10pmDonald Trump creates wealth for many people,your boy destroys wealth for many people,that’s the biggest difference between the two.
Report Post »flagbearer
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 3:12pm@ProgressiveLiberalMarine
“Our Koch Brothers is your Soros. It’s pretty much the exact same think.”
No, they’re far from being the same. The Koch Brothers aren’t trying to bring down America.
Report Post »nptden
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 3:49pmObama is a fraud…No birth certificate…Mommy and Daddy were Communist Revolutionaries. No college record…but yet attended hot beds of liberalism and communism…Had not real political record aside from Community Organizing which he learned from communists. And both he and Hillary Clinton were looking at Sol Alinsky as a mentor, who was a Communist. DUH….what does that say?
Report Post »SavingtheRepublic.com
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 3:49pmTrump, birthers, everyone is wrong on this and “barking up the wrong tree. BHO’s actions are that of someone hiding something that is for sure but what? Its not where he was born folks its more than likely his true LEGAL identity!
We know his mother sent him back to the US to live with his grandparents, after her marriage to Soetoro failed, but if his name was legally changed to Barry Soetoro did his grandparents even think to LEGALLY CHANGE HIS NAME back to BHO when he moved back to Hawaii? Is it safe to assume that his grandparents, heck any of our families, would overlook the name change since it happened overseas and just start calling our kid the name that we have always known them by after a failed marriage!? Safe to assume we all could agree that 40 yrs ago it was the last thing on anyones mind. Oddly, sites like Snopes and FactCheck never deny such an assumption within the birther argument and in debunking of the birther theory sites like these even support the theory being presented here!
If Barack Obama’s LEGAL name is Barry Soetoro and thats the name on his drivers license, medical, educational, financial records etc, the name he has signed his name to be, he is in fact committing identity fraud every single time he has signed his name Barack Hussein Obama II! The Presidency would be void, every single bill signed into law by BHO VOID, spending/deficit etc all under him void and would throw the US into chaos.
Report Post »avenger
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 4:02pmdonald is a brown streak on the shorts of commerce….he has no impact on you, unless you were dumb enough to buy one of his failures..
Report Post »ritamweep
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 4:21pm‘Oh, and many voters would vote based on looks.’ Regarding Palin, I think most progressive women would vote against her based on looks. They do not seem to handle a good looking conservative woman very well.
Report Post »WhiteTeaParty
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 4:32pmWhat an idiot, I hope he does run so he can lose all that money.
When will these idiots ever learn, when you spend a lot of your own money the candidate never wins.
Report Post »Reagan Knight
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 4:52pmthe other news venues are not gonna give Sarah a fair playin’ field,come on,i expect more from a marine.Oh,“progressive liberal”thats right.
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 5:05pmwildjoker5
Report Post »“About 12% of the vote for Obama was 99% racially motivated.” So what? Do you think that none of the vote against him was racially motivated? I know you would like to, because everyone who opposes Obama’s policies based on political principles hates to admit that they are standing shoulder to shoulder with bigots who are just looking for some other reason to dislike him so they don’t have to admit to themselves that they are bigots. But the fact is you are standing shoulder to shoulder with bigots in denial. It’s always a mistake to assume that people who agree with you have to be better or smarter than people who disagree with you.
bullcrapbuster
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 5:39pmI have thought it through thoroughly an I believe at this time that Palin would make the best candidate and President. I could write a small book on all the reasons that I believe the above. A few reasons:The left is terrified of her, (see her as their greatest threat) she is a solid conservative, she draws huge crowds, she comes across as “one of us”,during a campaign she would easily dispell the lies from the left and expose their viciousness, she is as tough or tougher than the “iron lady” Maggi Thacher, she has sound principles and stands by them,she does not back down, she is very intelligent and America needs her now. etc.etc. etc.
Report Post »Winghunter
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 5:53pmYour entire drivel is “bad”. Palin had to deal with a dozen frivilous lawsuits brought by your like-minded treasonous scum as she was facing bankruptcy before she even left office.
You can ignore the truth, traitor, loyal Americans will always be here to shove your face back in it.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 6:52pm@ progressiveliberalmarine,your name gives me the impression you’re confused.here’s my reasoning,progressives are enemies of the constitution,there against little things like property rights,second amendment free speech unless it’s their speech.They want to tell us what to eat what to drive,in general they just want to control us as much as they can.So how can you be a progressive and defend the constitution at the same time?
So let’s hear it
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 7:06pmonce again…beautiful analysis WHITE…I hear ya man. What your sayin’ is that they should be more like George right? set up a bunch of conservative “groups” that by stealth subvert the left in all sorts of ways right? huh huh? Oh yeah right shhhhh. Did I say that too loud. Sorry WHITE. Well, maybe no one will get it. Keep postin’ I am learning so much. :)
Report Post »nptden
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 7:16pmDonald, go for it. I remember playing four wall handball with you in the Downtown Athletic Club. You were always a sore loser….Go for the birther issue, and pursue why we can‘t get records of Obama’s school career. Another thing Donald. I had hard times and was on the streets. Guys down the Village in Washington Sq Park and Tomkins Park remember the Great One in his drug days. And Donald you got the bucks to figure how he went on a tour of Pakistan and other Muslim countries…Let’s show this dude for REALLY who he is. Give me a call I need a job. Love to help you.
Report Post »TheBlazeReader
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 8:57pm@ PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL MARINE
Report Post »^Low Lifes ^Bad ^Kicks the first 2′s A**
TheBlazeReader
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 8:59pmI’m scanning for Communist! (Look at my image)
Report Post »Rumsfeld
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 9:36pmYour no marine, trollplant
Report Post »conservativeone
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 10:41pmYou’re a Victim Of Typical Biased News …
Liberals Apes were filing lawsuits on Sarah Palin. They even filed one against her for allowing Greta to wear a jacket that had the make of a snowmobile on it, and claimed she was advertising the make when Governor.
Being that she was a “Government Official” the State of Alaska had to foot the bill for the legal fees for these lawsuits. Even though EVERY LAWSUIT was dismissed, it was still costing the Tax Payers of Alaska Millions.
Sarah Palin knew these personal attacks would not stop and decided to step down. Thus saving the Alaskan Tax Payers from having to waste money.
It’s called character … It’s called integrity … You Liberals politicize it because it makes you feel better. Her state knows the truth and still adores her.
Tell Me Genius … What were Obama’s qualifications ??? He was a “No Show Senator”. Voting “Present” more than any other Senator. Even though he was being paid to make decisions.
How about stabbing Senator Alice Palmer (his so-called mentor) in the back to steal away her senate seat ??? How about running unopposed because he had smeared everyone that challenged him ???
Report Post »Obama never ran a State, Never Balanced a Budget, and Never Owned a Business (Unless Of Course You Count His Selling Marijuana In College)
Rowgue
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:09pmActually she quit because democrats had filed a whole slew of frivilous lawsuits that they fully intended to drag out in the courts for years draining the taxpayers of Alaska dry. I’m sure it would have been more honorable for her to do like the creten former governers of Illinois and use millions of taxpayer dollars on their defense and end up convicted and in prison anyway.
As soon as she resigned all the lawsuits were dropped. Proving undoubtedly that they were all baseless and only intended to be distractions and a smear campaign.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on March 17, 2011 at 11:55pmIt’s really simple. The birth certificate Obama produced is fake. Even though the State of Hawaii said it’s legitimate, it’s not. Even though Republican Governor said the birth certificate was legitimate, it is not. Even though there were birth announcements from Hawaii newspaper of his birth, they are simply wrong. Any and all evidence that Obama was born in this country is false. That’s a given.
So what else does President Obama have to offer? Nothing. Enuf said.
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 12:16amYour wrong JZS, by far, I wasn’t one of these birther people, but there has been a lot of work put into trying to get hi real birth certificate and nothing.
I am not saying the man wasn’t born here, cause I don’t know that. However, I Will say , some thing is very Fishy. I have a feeling they are hiding something. The more research done of the guy, turns out nothing. He did the same for his entry into the Senate. I don’t know , even you JZS, who seems fairly smart, would look over the facts and say the same.
restorehope
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 12:39amSo Trump expresses some doubt about Obama’s birth in Hawaii. So what’s wrong with that? It has become a federal offense to question whether Obama is being wholly truthful about the subject. This reaction is encouraged and promoted by progressives. They even made up a new term “birthers” to demean anyone who has questions about the subject. If Obama cannot even once publicly state his place of birth (and leaves others to do it), then it is only natural that the question remains on the table. Trump is an astute businessman and realist who needs proof – substantiated proof – before he will commit to a fact or statement. When you want to know something, go to the source. In this case, the source is unwilling to allay suspicions….and that is very unsettling to people who just want the truth.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 2:59amREARDEN STEEL 90% of blacks
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 3:12amJZS Why doesn’t he open all his records and put this to rest? Including his school records. The smartest Nobel winning man/god on earth shouldn’t have a problem with this ……..unless you have something to hide. JZS=Duh he is hiding Why?
Report Post »Oil_Robb
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 7:04amAnd Hilary was supoerted because she was smart? and The big eared one was suported because he is half white?
Report Post »Nancy in NC
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 7:49amYou, like the President, took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution. Since progressives (how ironic the name) are open in their derision of the Constitution, you are disingeneous.
Report Post »GorBud
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 12:54pmThe idea of birthers misses the mark. Obama will NOT release his long form birth record because in the box for religion was entered Muslim since his mother practiced no religion but the father was born a Muslim. It is a religion you can’t quit or change. Campaign staff probably wanted that hidden in 2007 since it may have sunk him in the race. Now they are too deep into the cover-up. According to his writings and interviews he seems to NEVER had a normal or even a conservative friend, mentor or professor. He was always, as he says, was attracted to the radicals and Marxists professors and students. His is singular view of the country and mainstream Americans. His screed about clinging to guns and religion is right out of the liberal/progressive dismissive handbook of what anyone who is not them must in fact be. Stop in any small town diner and talk politics. There many interesting and well informed people spread across the country, both right and left. Big cities tend to be echo chambers of someone‘s else’s recycled liberal ideas. Very little independent thoughts and ideas. Political correctness rules the day and is ingrained from childhood. I truly doubt Obama has ever examined his ideas and political views with an independent eye or a balanced view from the many intellectual writings, by Independents and Conservatives.
Report Post »Liberty7
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 2:53pmThe reason Palin left office early was due to the Democrats using Alaskan ethics laws to harrass her while she was trying to serve the state. In Alaska, government employees have to pay for their own legal counsel if they have ethics violations brought up against them. Palin was having so many ethics charges brought up against her (one charge was so frivilous–she was brought up on ethics charges for wearing a jacket with the manufacturer’s emblem on the front while doing state business as the governor) that it was taking too much time to defend and she couldn’t effectively perform her duties as Governor; not to mention the huge financial cost to her family. Now she is called a quitter and ridiculed by the likes of you Donald for doing the right thing for the people of Alaska. Donald, I don’t recall you offerring to pay her legal bills, but then again, maybe I am wrong. And in response to you running as a third party candidate……..go ahead if you want The Big Zero to be president until Jan. 20, 2017.
Report Post »Kalish
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 7:58pmProgressiveLiberalMarine said :
Nope, because the Marines I know don‘t care about my beliefs as long as I don’t try and push them on my co-workers. In fact, I have good debates with many of them all the time.
Tell us, how do you debate people without truth, facts, or a defense ?
Report Post »idiots4obamaCom
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 8:03pmVisit IDIOTS4OBAMA COM to see how dumb progressives are and what they support.
Report Post »rdk
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 10:13pmKeep in mind that the legal bills for attorneys kept mounting as the Democrat Machine tried to destroy her. By resigning she was free to both earn money and reply to attacks and removed herself from attacks on Alaska. She made a wise but unconventional move; if she had toughed it out, there was a good chance she would be financially ruined.
Report Post »phlint69
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 10:44pmSomeone please tell me how we can have a president that has been in office over 2 LONG years and still AFTER his election his school records, his high school records, his college records, HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE,and other background information are still restricted from public view AFTER his election. How on gods green earth could anyone get elected without disclosing all this BEFOREHAND. Under normal circumstances any one vieing for the presidency and refusing to disclose this information would IMMEDIATELY be tossed aside . WHAT HAVE WE COME TO.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »truemedia
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 11:52pmAt least she showed up and casted important votes not like NOBAMA who didn’t vote on anything…
truemedia
Posted on March 18, 2011 at 11:54pmfrankly Martin Luther King would be ashamed of Obama for he (king) dies for the right to be judged by the CONTENT OF HIS CHARACTER…Something Obama lacks!
Report Post »*************************
Posted on March 19, 2011 at 1:06amAmerica is closing in on Barack Hussein Obama, AKA Barry Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro, illegal alien Kenyan … and all the socialist horses and all the commie men … will fall with him. :)
“I must of killed more men than Cecil B. De Mille.” -town drunk Jim, Blazing Saddles
Report Post »The Watchman
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 4:18pmObama is not a USA “natural born” citizen and for the life of me, I don’t understand why no one in a position to do something about this hasn’t done anything. The Constitution states that the President must be a “natural born” citizen of the USA. Although the Constitution doesn’t define a “natural born” citizen common law and many court cases, including 4 different US Supreme Court rulings has. They define a “natural born” citizen as one who’s both parents are citizens of the USA. Obama’s father was never a USA citizen; therefore, Obama is not a “natural born” citizen and is not legally our President.
Report Post »The Wizard
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 4:43pmTo PROGRESSIVELIBERALMARINE, Isn’t that like PROLIFEABORTIONDOCTOR. Get lost and say hi to Soros or media matters for us. People need to recognize plants who come on claiming to be an ExDemocrat or Liberal Marine, I USED TO LIKE BECK etc.. then try to take control of debate by stimulating everyone to talk about you. Get lost
Semper Fi to all the true Marines
Report Post »